<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Playboy's economic indicator: The Playmate Index]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/18/in-search-of-an-economic-indicator-the-playmate-index/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/18/in-search-of-an-economic-indicator-the-playmate-index/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/18/in-search-of-an-economic-indicator-the-playmate-index/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/11/playboy_cover.jpg" />Recently, various writers have been <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/19/weekinreview/19lewin.html">alluding</a> to Terry Pettijohn's now-mythical survey of the relationship between <em>Playboy </em>Playmates and the economy. Pettijohn's argument is that, as times get tougher, male concepts of beauty shift toward more mature, stable-looking women who are older, taller, and less curvy. Conversely, in boom times, the woman of choice would be shorter, younger, and more hourglass-shaped.<br /><br />While my knowledge of <em>Playboy </em>Playmates was once disturbingly encyclopedic, I have to admit that I have been out of the game for quite some time now. That said, I'd have to question Professor Pettijohn's methodology, if only for the fact that the <em>Playboy </em>ideal has shown far less fluctuation over the years than society at large. To put it bluntly, many of the heroin addict-thin models that grace the pages of women's fashion magazines would never be allowed within arm's length of a <em>Playboy </em>pictorial. Like the <a href="http://www.daleassociation.com/images/Rockettes.jpg">Rockettes</a>, Playmates have traditionally remained within a comfortably healthy median, neither ballerina scrawny nor fully zaftig.<br /><br />Now, arguably, there could be some comparisons drawn between economic boom/bust cycles and the shapes of women's bodies. Certainly, the androgynous flapper look of the 1920's, the Twiggy look of the 1960's, and the starvation victim/heroin addict look of the late 1990's/early 2000's are somewhat comparable. Similarly, the hourglass 1940's, 1950's, and 1980's have similar style cues. While it would be silly to take these comparisons to extremes, fashion goes in cycles, and those cycles overlap somewhat with the economy. However, this is far from a direct confluence; the 1930's look, for example, was still boyish, and our current ultra-thin look has been developing for quite some time.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/18/in-search-of-an-economic-indicator-the-playmate-index/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Playboy's economic indicator: The Playmate Index</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/18/in-search-of-an-economic-indicator-the-playmate-index/">Playboy's economic indicator: The Playmate Index</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 18 Nov 2008 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/18/in-search-of-an-economic-indicator-the-playmate-index/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1375865/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/18/in-search-of-an-economic-indicator-the-playmate-index/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economic indicators</category><category>EconomicIndicators</category><category>featured</category><category>kate moss</category><category>KateMoss</category><category>playboy</category><category>playmates</category><category>Rockettes</category><category>Terry Pettijohn</category><category>TerryPettijohn</category><category>twiggy</category><category>Venus of Willendorf</category><category>VenusOfWillendorf</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Watson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Spokesperson fiasco #2: Kate Moss and the fashion world]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/22/spokesperson-fiascos-2-kate-moss-and-the-fashion-world/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/22/spokesperson-fiascos-2-kate-moss-and-the-fashion-world/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/22/spokesperson-fiascos-2-kate-moss-and-the-fashion-world/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right"  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/07/fiascos-moss-200-cs071708.jpg" alt="" /><em>This post is part of a series on celebrity spokespeople who ended up doing serious harm to the brands they were hired to promote, or vice versa. See how we rank t<a href="http://money.aol.com/special/top-celebrity-spokesperson-fiascos">he 20 top spokesperson fiasco</a>s.</em></p>
<p>The clich&eacute; of the pencil-thin model is made corporeal in the body of supermodel Kate Moss, the waif that launched a thousand brands. Among those brands tying their fortune to her size 0 sails were H&amp;M (STO:HMB), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/burberry-grp-ord-0-05p/brby/ise">Burberry </a>(LON:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/burberry-grp-ord-0-05p/brby/ise">BRBY</a>) and Chanel.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, they made the same mistake many baseball owners did -- failing to ask just how their star could maintain such a remarkable body. <a href="http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2005/10/17/8358063/index.htm">The answer for Moss, apparently, was toot.</a> When she was photographed in 2005 by London's Daily Mail <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kate_Moss">using cocaine at a Babyshambles recording session</a>, the fashion industry recoiled in faux revulsion. </p>
<p>Leading the retreat were the brands to whom she had lent her good name, the same H&amp;M, Burberry and Chanel. Each invoked the morals clause to terminate her contract, making that a multi-million dollar line of coke. </p>
<p>So that was the end of Moss, right? Think again. In the fashion world, morals transgressions are so, like, yesterday. Within a year, <a href="http://www.contactmusic.com/new/xmlfeed.nsf/mndwebpages/moss%20to%20earn%20double%20despite%20cocaine%20scandal_26_02_2006">Moss had signed new contracts with Calvin Klein and other top fashions brands</a>. Brendan Behan, who said there is no such thing as bad publicity (except your own obituary) knew what he was talking about, at least in the fashion world.</p>
<p><em><a href="http://money.aol.com/special/top-celebrity-spokesperson-fiascos">Read the entire series</a></em></p>
<p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/22/spokesperson-fiascos-2-kate-moss-and-the-fashion-world/#poll16852">View Poll</a></p><br /><br /></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/22/spokesperson-fiascos-2-kate-moss-and-the-fashion-world/">Spokesperson fiasco #2: Kate Moss and the fashion world</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 22 Jul 2008 07:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/22/spokesperson-fiascos-2-kate-moss-and-the-fashion-world/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1255315/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/22/spokesperson-fiascos-2-kate-moss-and-the-fashion-world/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>burberry</category><category>chanel</category><category>fashion</category><category>hm</category><category>kate moss</category><category>KateMoss</category><category>spokesperson fiascos</category><category>SpokespersonFiascos</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Barlow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 07:00:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
