<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Tin Prices Soar to Over $20,000 per Ton]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/06/tin-prices-soar-to-over-20-000-per-ton/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/06/tin-prices-soar-to-over-20-000-per-ton/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/06/tin-prices-soar-to-over-20-000-per-ton/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/india/" rel="tag">India</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/japan/" rel="tag">Japan</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/03/benketaro-copper-mine.jpg" />Why has the price of tin jumped in recent weeks? The economic rebound in Japan and parts of Europe has spurred increased demand for the commodity. Tin is used for soldering, especially in electronics. Inventories are down 50%.</p>
<p>The increased demand has come with falling production, especially in Indonesia, the world's largest producer. Tin prices have risen 30% in two months. On the London Metals Exchange (LME), <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/b50298d0-a0b7-11df-badd-00144feabdc0.html">tin traded as high as $20,750 per ton</a>. This is the highest level since August 2008.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/06/tin-prices-soar-to-over-20-000-per-ton/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Tin Prices Soar to Over $20,000 per Ton</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/06/tin-prices-soar-to-over-20-000-per-ton/">Tin Prices Soar to Over $20,000 per Ton</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 06 Aug 2010 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/b50298d0-a0b7-11df-badd-00144feabdc0.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/06/tin-prices-soar-to-over-20-000-per-ton/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19583163/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/06/tin-prices-soar-to-over-20-000-per-ton/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>copper</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>lead</category><category>nickel</category><category>tin</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Chinese Buying Spurs Copper Rally to a 16-Month High]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/06/chinese-buying-spurs-copper-rally-to-a-16-month-high/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/06/chinese-buying-spurs-copper-rally-to-a-16-month-high/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/06/chinese-buying-spurs-copper-rally-to-a-16-month-high/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/from-the-boards/" rel="tag">From the Boards</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a></p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704842604574642012312132706.html?mod=WSJ_hps_sections_markets"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/copper_wire_dall.jpg" /></a><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704842604574642012312132706.html?mod=WSJ_hps_sections_markets">Chinese buying drove copper prices to a 16-month high</a>. Three-month copper traded at $7,618 per metric ton, up $133.
<p>Here's an interesting dynamic. Copper prices in Shanghai were higher than those on the LME. This allows traders to import copper at a profit. This helps to explain why there was such strong buying on the LME. </p>
<p>Copper was able to ignore the settlement of a strike at a Chilean copper mine.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/06/chinese-buying-spurs-copper-rally-to-a-16-month-high/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Chinese Buying Spurs Copper Rally to a 16-Month High</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/06/chinese-buying-spurs-copper-rally-to-a-16-month-high/">Chinese Buying Spurs Copper Rally to a 16-Month High</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 06 Jan 2010 16:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704842604574642012312132706.html?mod=WSJ_hps_sections_markets>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/06/chinese-buying-spurs-copper-rally-to-a-16-month-high/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19305204/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/06/chinese-buying-spurs-copper-rally-to-a-16-month-high/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>base metals prices</category><category>commodities</category><category>copper</category><category>copper prices</category><category>CopperPrices</category><category>inthenews</category><category>lead</category><category>zinc</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 16:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Guerilla consumer groups testing toys for lead in stores]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/16/guerilla-consumer-groups-testing-toys-for-lead-in-stores/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/16/guerilla-consumer-groups-testing-toys-for-lead-in-stores/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/16/guerilla-consumer-groups-testing-toys-for-lead-in-stores/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p>Worried about the honesty and effectiveness of the toy-screening conducted by major toy manufacturers and retailers? <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122938878154208997.html">Zap 'em yourself with a Niton X-ray fluorescence analyzer</a>, or XRF gun. That's what many consumer groups, including the Center for Environmental Health and HealthyToys.org, do in the continuing struggle to keep dangerous toys off retailer's shelves. The handheld guns go for $25,000 and emit mini x-rays which strike the toy; the "elements in that sample emit return rays with frequencies that indicate which elements are present and in what amounts."<br /><br />Retailers and manufacturers are not pleased, contending that such guerilla testing is a poor manner of assessing a toy's safety. But the XRF gun is what the CPSC itself uses to test toys, which consumer groups point to as evidence that the technology is appropriate. (The CPSC goes on to send toys that read hot to a third-party laboratory for verification.) And anyway: this manner of testing actually uncovers toys which are toxic, much better than the CPSC's old strategy: go to stores, and look for the ones with bright colors (more likely to be tainted with lead). A comparison of the two strategies showed the XRF gun screening to have a far higher discovery rate, though of course many items that had high readings on the XRF gun were shown to be safe after further lab testing.<br /><br />But who wants consumer advocacy groups out looking for bad toys? Certainly not the toy companies, who can only stand to be hurt by the increased scrutiny and "fear-mongering." In a column published earlier today I wrote about my <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/16/mama-on-the-street-mattel-vs-the-little-guy-in-toy-toxins/">concern over the fate of small toymakers</a> given the impending effective date of the CPSIA. I can't exactly shed big tears, then, for the bigger manufacturers and importers who might be hurt by the discovery of toxins (even if the alarm bells ring a bit too loudly and too soon). The two manners of dealing with the toxic toy issue -- attacking it in the streets with ray guns, or clamping a shackle of expensive testing around each toy before it hits the market -- both seem wrong-headed, one too reactive, the other too proactive. Isn't there a better middle ground?<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/16/guerilla-consumer-groups-testing-toys-for-lead-in-stores/">Guerilla consumer groups testing toys for lead in stores</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 16 Dec 2008 16:02:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/16/guerilla-consumer-groups-testing-toys-for-lead-in-stores/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1403265/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/16/guerilla-consumer-groups-testing-toys-for-lead-in-stores/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cpsc</category><category>lead</category><category>lead paint</category><category>LeadPaint</category><category>recalls</category><category>toy</category><category>xrf</category><category>xrf gun</category><category>XrfGun</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 16:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Kmart pulls lead-free items that contain lead]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/17/kmart-pulls-lead-free-items-that-contain-lead/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/17/kmart-pulls-lead-free-items-that-contain-lead/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/17/kmart-pulls-lead-free-items-that-contain-lead/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a></p><p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/17/business/17lead.html?ref=business">According to the <em>New York Times</em></a>, "Kmart said yesterday that it would remove all jewelry advertised as 'lead free' from its shelves after workers at lead monitoring programs who tested the pieces found that some actually contained high concentrations of the metal."</p>
<p>One charm labeled lead-free was 52% lead. What is interesting here is that it raises questions about how much responsibility companies have about products that they source from third-party manufacturers.</p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lululemon-athletica-inc/lulu/nas">Lululemon Athletica Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/lululemon-athletica-inc/lulu/nas">LULU</a>) ended up embroiled in a minor scandal after a <em>New York Times</em> piece found that products the company was selling (the material in question was manufactured by a third party) --  labeled as containing seaweed -- <a href="http://today.reuters.com/news/articleinvesting.aspx?type=comktNews&amp;rpc=33&amp;storyid=2007-11-14T212640Z_01_N14162053_RTRIDST_0_LULULEMON-STOCK-UPDATE-3.XML">actually contained no seaweed</a>. While it sent the stock down as much as 9%, the share price ended up closing higher on the day of the story. Lululemon has since put out a press release refuting the <em>New York Times</em> claim, saying that its products actually do contain what they say they contain.</p>
<p>The legal issues could be murky. But these companies know that consumers aren't going to want to shop at stores in which products are labeled in a misleading way, and so they're taking steps to evaluate manufacturers' claims -- before the <em>New York Times</em> does.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/17/kmart-pulls-lead-free-items-that-contain-lead/">Kmart pulls lead-free items that contain lead</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 17 Nov 2007 12:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/17/kmart-pulls-lead-free-items-that-contain-lead/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1042381/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/17/kmart-pulls-lead-free-items-that-contain-lead/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><category>Kmart</category><category>lead</category><category>Lulu</category><category>Lululemon</category><category>Lululemon Athletica</category><category>product labels</category><category>third-party manufacturers</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 12:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Lead, toys, and irony: Amazon.com pulls Fisher Price toy medical kit]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/06/lead-toys-and-irony-amazon-com-pulls-fisher-price-toy-medical/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/06/lead-toys-and-irony-amazon-com-pulls-fisher-price-toy-medical/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/06/lead-toys-and-irony-amazon-com-pulls-fisher-price-toy-medical/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amzn/" rel="tag">Amazon.com (AMZN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mat/" rel="tag">Mattel, Inc (MAT)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/recall_blood_pressure.jpg" />Is it time to start selling your <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mattel-inc/mat/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Mattel, Inc.,</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mattel-inc/mat/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">MAT</a>) stock? In Yet Another incidence of Fisher Price toys being tainted (figuratively and literally) with lead, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas">Amazon.com</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas">AMZN</a>) <a href="http://consumerist.com/consumer/lead-contamination/amazon-pulls-fisher+price-medical-kit-after-cr-lead-report-319460.php">has pulled the Fisher Price Medical Kit</a> from its web site after a <em>Consumer Reports</em> article that questioned the lead content in the kit's toy blood pressure cuff. Mattel has insisted that children can play doctor safely because the toy "meets the requirements set forth in the federal regulations and international consumer product safety standards, including the existing standards for lead content." Note Mattel did not claim that the toy was free from lead.<br /><br />As I've mentioned before, these toy recalls have lead (har!) me to the conclusion that <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/05/mattels-third-toy-recall-parents-response-ho-hum-could-barbie/">it's just not worth buying plastic toys for my children any more</a>. I've been flipping through the <a href="http://www.novanatural.com/">Nova Natural</a> catalog to plan for holiday buying and regularly carting off boxes of my boys' plastic toys to Goodwill.<br /><br />Judging by the excitement over <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/01/wal-mart-launches-secret-early-black-friday-website/">leaked Black Friday ads</a>, it seems as if I'm a rarity. This news does bring out a couple of questions, however:<br />
<ul>
    <li>Will we soon start seeing vigilante recalls like this one from Amazon.com as retailers work to minimize their risk in toy recalls?</li>
    <li>Does it cost enough to effect a recall that it might make sense to anger a major supplier like Mattel?</li>
    <li>Isn't this recall just a little bit too ironic? <em>My</em> blood pressure is rising, too!</li>
</ul>
Answers would be appreciated; though of course my biggest question will remain unanswered for some time, ergo, <em>how long will consumers continue to put up with unsafe products</em>?<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/06/lead-toys-and-irony-amazon-com-pulls-fisher-price-toy-medical/">Lead, toys, and irony: Amazon.com pulls Fisher Price toy medical kit</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 06 Nov 2007 17:55:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://consumerist.com/consumer/lead-contamination/amazon-pulls-fisher+price-medical-kit-after-cr-lead-report-319460.php>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/06/lead-toys-and-irony-amazon-com-pulls-fisher-price-toy-medical/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1032169/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/06/lead-toys-and-irony-amazon-com-pulls-fisher-price-toy-medical/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>amazon.com</category><category>amzn</category><category>blood-pressure-cuff</category><category>featured</category><category>fisher-price</category><category>fisherprice</category><category>lead</category><category>lead-paint</category><category>mat</category><category>mattel</category><category>medical-kit</category><category>medicalkit</category><category>recall</category><category>recalls</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 17:55:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is there lead in your lipstick?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/15/is-there-lead-in-your-lipstick/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/15/is-there-lead-in-your-lipstick/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/15/is-there-lead-in-your-lipstick/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pg/" rel="tag">Procter and Gamble (PG)</a></p><p>Lead scares have moved from toys to lipstick. If you use L'Oreal or Cover Girl lipstick you could be exposing yourself to lead levels the Food and Drug Administration does not allow in candy, according to a study by the <a href="http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/10/14/bloomberg/bxlipstick.php">Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (CSC).</a> L'Oreal is based in Paris and Cover Girl lipsticks are marketed by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-procter-and-gamble-company/pg/nys">Proctor &amp; Gamble</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-procter-and-gamble-company/pg/nys">PG</a>).</p>
<p>The Campaign for Safe Cosmetics said 20 of 33 brand name lipsticks had detectable levels of lead. The FDA is now conducting its own tests, but the agency spokesperson told <em>Bloomberg News</em> that it has not found dangerous levels previously. </p>
<p>CSC said they found lead levels ranging from 0.03 part per million to 0.65 part per million, which Harvard environmental epidemiology professor Joel Schwartz told <em>Bloomberg</em> can have the potential to increase risks of health hazards. Long term exposure to lead can result in higher blood pressure, kidney damage and loss of mental function.</p>
<p>In fact, CSC found that one-third of the lipsticks tested had lead levels that exceed the FDA's 0.1 per million limit for lead in candy. The products with levels exceeding 0.1 part per million included L'Oreal's Colour Riche True Red, Cover Girl's Incredifull Lipcolor Maximum Red and Maybelline's Moisture Extreme Cocoa Plum.</p>
<p>CSC wants cosmetics companies to test their products for lead. They also asked companies to require suppliers to guarantee that raw materials are lead-free. Neither seem to be outrageous requests.</p>
<p>How much of an impact will this have on P&amp;G stock? Don't expect to see much yet, but if the FDA confirms CSC findings, P&amp;G's stock will take a hit.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/15/is-there-lead-in-your-lipstick/">Is there lead in your lipstick?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 15 Oct 2007 10:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/10/14/bloomberg/bxlipstick.php>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/15/is-there-lead-in-your-lipstick/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1013239/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/15/is-there-lead-in-your-lipstick/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Cover Girl</category><category>CoverGirl</category><category>L'Oreal</category><category>lead</category><category>llipstick</category><category>Maybelline</category><category>pg</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lita Epstein]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 10:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Recalled Mattel (MAT) toys found to have 180 times the lead limit]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/19/recalled-mattel-mat-toys-found-to-have-180-times-the-lead-limi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/19/recalled-mattel-mat-toys-found-to-have-180-times-the-lead-limi/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/19/recalled-mattel-mat-toys-found-to-have-180-times-the-lead-limi/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mat/" rel="tag">Mattel, Inc (MAT)</a></p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/tupwanders/105679974/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/105679974_bfdd7b86cd_m.jpg" alt="" /></a>The headaches for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mattel-inc/mat/nys">Mattel, Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mattel-inc/mat/nys">MAT</a>) just keep on adding up, as the company's toys from this summer's recall have now been found to contain <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/mattel-toys-lead-180-times-the-limit/20070919063109990001">180 times the amount of lead allowed by law</a>. In addition, some jewelry sold by Oriental Trading Co. was found to have an ingredient mix that was 100% lead. That's positively alarming. 180 times the legal limit? Did Mattel's Chinese toy contractors dip all the toys in pure lead or something?<br /><br />For China, this is not good news, although the brunt of the negativity will be taken in by Mattel. After so many product and food recalls from China in the last year, it's hard to imagine that exports from that country won't be under the heaviest scrutiny by a congressional subcommittee. If you're a parent and your confidence in the quality of those Barbie toys (and others) has not been shattered by all this, I'd love to hear your comments below.<br /><br /><br /><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/19/recalled-mattel-mat-toys-found-to-have-180-times-the-lead-limi/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Recalled Mattel (MAT) toys found to have 180 times the lead limit</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/19/recalled-mattel-mat-toys-found-to-have-180-times-the-lead-limi/">Recalled Mattel (MAT) toys found to have 180 times the lead limit</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 19 Sep 2007 10:47:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/mattel-toys-lead-180-times-the-limit/20070919063109990001>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/19/recalled-mattel-mat-toys-found-to-have-180-times-the-lead-limi/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/993143/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/19/recalled-mattel-mat-toys-found-to-have-180-times-the-lead-limi/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>China</category><category>imports</category><category>inthenews</category><category>lead</category><category>limit</category><category>MAT</category><category>Mattel</category><category>recall</category><category>toys lead</category><category>ToysLead</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 10:47:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Mattel's third toy recall: Parents response ho-hum, could Barbie survive?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/05/mattels-third-toy-recall-parents-response-ho-hum-could-barbie/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/05/mattels-third-toy-recall-parents-response-ho-hum-could-barbie/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/05/mattels-third-toy-recall-parents-response-ho-hum-could-barbie/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mat/" rel="tag">Mattel, Inc (MAT)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/k9343_bongo.jpg" alt="" />After <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mattel-inc/mat/nys">Mattel</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mattel-inc/mat/nys">MAT</a>) announced its <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/02/total-recall-fisher-price-to-recall-one-million-toys-made-in-ch/">first huge lead-based paint recall</a> spanning dozens of <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/photos/mattel-toy-recall/">my children's favorite toys</a>, from Diego to Elmo (how <em>could </em>you?), my initial response was something along the lines of: no more Chinese toys, ever! After <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/14/mattel-mat-looking-into-the-latest-recall/">the second recall</a>, largely focused on Polly Pocket dolls (I have boys but still, Polly Pocket is hard to resist) and choking hazards, I went even further and darkly considered removing the plastics from my family's consumption altogether -- <a href="http://urbanmamas.typepad.com//urbanmamas/2007/08/mattel-recall-r.html">more than one friend made that decision</a>, too, putting plastic toys and Tupperware in garbage bags and <a href="http://angrychicken.typepad.com/angry_chicken/2007/08/major-improveme.html">divesting entirely</a>.<br /><br />Late last night, Mattel announced <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/04/flash-mattel-to-recall-more-chinese-toys/">yet another recall</a>, this one not quite so big as the others and focused largely on small parts of Barbie accessories -- the dog from the Barbie Dream Puppy House; the cat from the Barbie Dream Kitty Condo; the dog and dinner plates from the table and chairs kitchen playset -- as well as a few toddler toys, two GeoTrax trains and the lid from a bongo drum in a <span style="font-style: italic;">Big, Big World</span> playset. And I? Had almost no reaction. I didn't frantically root through my children's toy boxes, searching for toxic toys. I didn't email all my friends, using a subject line with several exclamation points. I didn't call my pediatrician's office to schedule a blood lead test (ok, so I've already done that). Mattel, I've decided, isn't the bad guy here; nor am I quite as angry at China (even though I'll admit to a greatly heightened blood pressure when I heard that a Chinese government official objected to lead limits in children's jewelry).<br /><br />The thing is, while I've decided to severely limit my consumption of plastic children's toys, this isn't about<em> them</em> anymore.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/05/mattels-third-toy-recall-parents-response-ho-hum-could-barbie/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Mattel's third toy recall: Parents response ho-hum, could Barbie survive?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/05/mattels-third-toy-recall-parents-response-ho-hum-could-barbie/">Mattel's third toy recall: Parents response ho-hum, could Barbie survive?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 05 Sep 2007 13:07:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/05/mattels-third-toy-recall-parents-response-ho-hum-could-barbie/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/981690/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/05/mattels-third-toy-recall-parents-response-ho-hum-could-barbie/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>barbie</category><category>barbie recall</category><category>BarbieRecall</category><category>china</category><category>china recall</category><category>ChinaRecall</category><category>lead</category><category>lead recall</category><category>lead-based pain</category><category>Lead-basedPain</category><category>LeadRecall</category><category>mattel</category><category>mattel recall</category><category>Mattel toy recall</category><category>MattelRecall</category><category>MattelToyRecall</category><category>recall</category><category>toy recall</category><category>ToyRecall</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 13:07:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[An expert's view of the lead-in-toys scandal]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/15/an-experts-view-of-the-lead-in-toys-scandal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/15/an-experts-view-of-the-lead-in-toys-scandal/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/15/an-experts-view-of-the-lead-in-toys-scandal/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hd/" rel="tag">Home Depot (HD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/interviews/" rel="tag">Interviews</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/leadtoy07.jpg" alt="" />In an effort to better understand the lead-in-toys scandal, I had a chance today to talk to an industry expert on the topic. Dr. Marcia Stone holds a Ph.D. in Organic Chemistry and is Founder/President of <a href="http://www.leadcheck.com/index.shtml">Hybrivet Systems</a>, a manufacturer of lead-testing equipment for industry and home use. She has worked in the lead testing field for 15 years.</p>
<p>I asked Dr, Stone why manufacturers would use lead paint? She explained that "Lead in paint provides a hard, glossy, pretty finish, the reason it was once used extensively in expensive housing. Leaded paint is also easy to work with and inexpensive."</p>
<p>What lead-containing products have you found on American shelves that consumers should be concerned about?<br />"The scandal over lead in children's jewelry is not over; we continue to find these products for sale," said Stone. She told me manufacturers will use a core of lead in cheap jewelry and cover it with nickel plating or paint, or use a solder containing lead in its construction. Children often chew on their jewelry, and as little as three milligrams of lead, about the size of three grains of sugar, can kill a child. Since lead has a sweet taste, the propensity for children to ingest it is even greater.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/15/an-experts-view-of-the-lead-in-toys-scandal/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>An expert's view of the lead-in-toys scandal</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/15/an-experts-view-of-the-lead-in-toys-scandal/">An expert's view of the lead-in-toys scandal</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 15 Aug 2007 18:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/15/an-experts-view-of-the-lead-in-toys-scandal/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/965887/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/15/an-experts-view-of-the-lead-in-toys-scandal/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION</category><category>CPSC</category><category>DR. MARCIA STONE</category><category>EPA</category><category>HD</category><category>HOME DEPOT</category><category>HYBRIVET SYSTEMS</category><category>lEAD</category><category>LEAD IMPORTS</category><category>LEAD IN PAINT</category><category>LEAD IN TOYS</category><category>LEAD POISONING</category><category>LEAD REGULATIONS</category><category>MAT</category><category>Mattel</category><category>Mattel toy recall</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Barlow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 18:01:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Go bearish on Mattel (MAT) after expanded recall]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/14/go-bearish-on-mattel-mat-after-expanded-recall/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/14/go-bearish-on-mattel-mat-after-expanded-recall/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/14/go-bearish-on-mattel-mat-after-expanded-recall/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mat/" rel="tag">Mattel, Inc (MAT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a></p><a target="_blank" href="http://www.shareholder.com/mattel/default.cfm"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/mat-logo.jpg" /></a><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mattel-inc/mat/nys">Mattel Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mattel-inc/mat/nys">MAT</a>) opened at $22.60. So far today the stock has hit a low of $22.10 and a high of $23.14. As of 10:40, MAT is trading at $22.73, down 0.84 (-3.6%).<br /><br />After hitting a one year high of 29.71 in April, the stock has been sliding over the past few months. Shares are dipping more still today after the toymaker <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/mattel-recalling-more-chinese-made-toys/n20070814102209990006">announced that it is recalling an additional 8.8 million Chinese-made toys on lead paint concerns</a>. With trouble like this and <a href="http://mat.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/14/mattel-the-china-recall-gets-worse/">potentially more on the way</a>, its hard to imagine this stock going up by too much over the next few months. Technical indicators for MAT are bearish and steady, while <a target="_blank" href="http://www.iotogo.com/spoutlookonline">S&amp;P</a> gives the stock a neutral 3 STARS (out of 5) hold rating.<br /><br />For a bearish hedged play on this stock, I would consider a January <a target="_blank" href="http://www.iotogo.com/HSCS">bear-call credit spread</a> above the $30 range. A bear-call credit spread is an options position that combines the purchase and sale of call options to hedge risk and leverage returns. For this particular trade, we will make a 4.2% return in just 5 months as long as MAT is below $30 at January expiration. MAT would have to rise by 31% before we would start to lose money. Learn more about trades like this one <a target="_blank" href="http://www.iotogo.com/HSCS">here</a>.<br /><br /><br /><a target="_blank" title="View Mattel dogged by China problem on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/02/mattel-dogged-by-china-problem/"></a><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/14/go-bearish-on-mattel-mat-after-expanded-recall/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Go bearish on Mattel (MAT) after expanded recall</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/14/go-bearish-on-mattel-mat-after-expanded-recall/">Go bearish on Mattel (MAT) after expanded recall</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 14 Aug 2007 11:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/14/go-bearish-on-mattel-mat-after-expanded-recall/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/964914/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/14/go-bearish-on-mattel-mat-after-expanded-recall/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>China</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Investors Observer</category><category>InvestorsObserver</category><category>lead</category><category>MAT</category><category>Mattel</category><category>Mattel toy recall</category><category>MattelToyRecall</category><category>options</category><category>recall</category><category>toys</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brent Archer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 11:15:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
