<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Starbucks (SBUX) catering to kids?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/12/starbucks-sbux-catering-to-kids/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/12/starbucks-sbux-catering-to-kids/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/12/starbucks-sbux-catering-to-kids/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sbux/" rel="tag">Starbucks (SBUX)</a></p><div align="center"><em><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/everett_with_icedcoffee_240.jpg" />"Duh, [this Italian roast] might stunt my growth. I wanna be 5'10" like Cindy Crawford." </em><em><font size="-1"> -- Alicia Silverstone as Cher Horowitz, </font></em><font size="-1">Clueless <em>(1995) <br /><br /></em></font>
<div align="left">The world's medical experts have never really suggested that coffee, with its high caffeine levels and its tendency to be laced with sugar and fatty milk products, is a good beverage for the still-growing population. But kids today <em>are </em>a growing consumer sect, so what's a java-centric shop like <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/starbucks-corporation/sbux/nas">Starbucks</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/starbucks-corporation/sbux/nas">SBUX</a>) to do? <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20608492/">Consider offering "alternative beverages" to the under-13 bunch</a>. <br /><br />A recent <em>MSNBC </em>article notes that while Starbucks has traditionally maintained that it doesn't market its products to children, some locations are revising their stance. Brandon Borman, a spokesman for the Seattle-based firm, told <em>MSNBC </em>that while there will not be specific campaigns aimed at children, there are talks about adding child-friendly beverages to the existing menus. "We need to be realistic about who comes into our stores," Bormon noted, "we want to make sure that we have products that are appropriate to that age group."<br /><div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/photos/starbucks-doesnt-market-to-kids-yes-it-does/">Starbucks doesn't market to kids? Yes it does!</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/photos/starbucks-doesnt-market-to-kids-yes-it-does/397595/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/everett_yogurt_starbucks_thumbnail.jpg" alt="Starbucks is kid-friendly because Mamas Need Coffee" title="Starbucks is kid-friendly because Mamas Need Coffee" /></a><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/photos/starbucks-doesnt-market-to-kids-yes-it-does/397589/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/truman_with_frappucino_thumbnail.jpg" alt="Frappuccinos appeal to even the youngest kids" title="Frappuccinos appeal to even the youngest kids" /></a><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/photos/starbucks-doesnt-market-to-kids-yes-it-does/397142/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/everett_with_icedcoffee_thumbnail.jpg" alt="Children: They're at Starbucks already" title="Children: They're at Starbucks already" /></a><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/photos/starbucks-doesnt-market-to-kids-yes-it-does/397268/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/starbucks_dan_zanes_thumbnail.jpg" alt="Dan Zanes is just the latest in a string of kid-friendly CDs on sale at Starbucks" title="Dan Zanes is just the latest in a string of kid-friendly CDs on sale at Starbucks" /></a><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/photos/starbucks-doesnt-market-to-kids-yes-it-does/397275/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/vanilla_cream_frappuccino_thumbnail.jpg" alt="Vanilla Cream Frappuccino seems obviously focused at children" title="Vanilla Cream Frappuccino seems obviously focused at children" /></a></div> </div>
</div><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/12/starbucks-sbux-catering-to-kids/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Starbucks (SBUX) catering to kids?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/12/starbucks-sbux-catering-to-kids/">Starbucks (SBUX) catering to kids?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 12 Sep 2007 09:23:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20608492/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/12/starbucks-sbux-catering-to-kids/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/986626/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/12/starbucks-sbux-catering-to-kids/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>frappucino</category><category>inthenews</category><category>latte</category><category>SBUX</category><category>starbucks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Beth Gaston Moon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 09:23:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[2% milk to make Starbucks customers skinnier (shhh!) in U.S., Canada]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/01/2-milk-to-make-starbucks-customers-skinnier-shhh-in-u-s-ca/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/01/2-milk-to-make-starbucks-customers-skinnier-shhh-in-u-s-ca/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/01/2-milk-to-make-starbucks-customers-skinnier-shhh-in-u-s-ca/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sbux/" rel="tag">Starbucks (SBUX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/02/starbucks_with_knitting.jpg" />Like your latte skinny? You may not even know it, but <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/starbucks-corporation/sbux/nas">Starbucks</a> Corporation (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/starbucks-corporation/sbux/nas">SBUX</a>) will soon replace the whole milk it pours into your coffee drinks by default <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/starbucks-switches-to-2-percent/n20070531170009990019">with 2% low-fat milk</a> in stores throughout the U.S. and Canada. Here in Oregon, where Starbucks had been testing the concept, I've been getting (ahem) skinnier for months already, and to be honest, I haven't noticed the difference in taste at all (when I'm in the mood for milk fat, I'll order a 'breve,' made with half-and-half instead of regular milk -- but I'm pregnant so you'll just have to indulge me and excuse my occasional luxury).<br /><br />Starbucks is banking that customers won't notice the difference, and if they do, they'll thank the beverage giant for the savings in calories and fat. It's somewhat ironic, as although Starbucks has been conducting a health campaign of sorts these past several months; switching to <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/02/starbucks-removes-trans-fats-effective-now-wait-starbucks-had/">trans-fat-free pastries</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/16/hormone-free-milk-starbucks-continues-play-to-consumers-health/">hormone-free milk</a>, and offering a "light" version of the chain's popular Frappuccinos; Starbucks' beverages and treats are famous for being, often, higher in both fat and calories than many competing options (just check out <a href="http://www.thatsfit.com/category/how-many-calories/">That's Fit's "How Many Calories?"</a> feature -- which often <a href="http://www.thatsfit.com/2006/11/11/how-many-calories-in-a-starbucks-eggnog-latte/">features Starbucks drinks</a>). Even switching to 2% milk won't (for instance) negate the considerable caloric surge of three pumps of sweetened syrup -- the default for a grande beverage.<br /><br />I think the switch is a smart one, both for the bottom line and the size of the average customer's bottom. It doesn't make sense to pour whole milk by default if most customers are used to drinking 2% in their homes (which seems to be the case). However, if I were consulting Starbucks on the overall health profile of its beverages, I'd suggest a switch to far less syrup in each beverage -- all that sugar has got to be worse for us than a little milk fat. What would you change about Starbucks' beverages if you were on the product development team?
<p> </p>
<p><script type="text/javascript"> digg_url = 'http://digg.com/business_finance/Starbucks_and_2_milk_Will_it_make_me_skinnier'; </script> <script src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.js" type="text/javascript"></script></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/01/2-milk-to-make-starbucks-customers-skinnier-shhh-in-u-s-ca/">2% milk to make Starbucks customers skinnier (shhh!) in U.S., Canada</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 01 Jun 2007 15:41:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/starbucks-switches-to-2-percent/n20070531170009990019>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/01/2-milk-to-make-starbucks-customers-skinnier-shhh-in-u-s-ca/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/908747/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/01/2-milk-to-make-starbucks-customers-skinnier-shhh-in-u-s-ca/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2% milk</category><category>2%Milk</category><category>coffee</category><category>healthy</category><category>latte</category><category>low-fat milk</category><category>Low-fatMilk</category><category>milk</category><category>nonfat milk</category><category>NonfatMilk</category><category>sbux</category><category>skim milk</category><category>SkimMilk</category><category>starbucks</category><category>starbucks latte</category><category>starbucks milk</category><category>StarbucksLatte</category><category>StarbucksMilk</category><category>whole milk</category><category>WholeMilk</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 15:41:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Starbucks, please don't take away my gingerbread latte in January!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/28/starbucks-please-dont-take-away-my-gingerbread-latte-in-januar/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/28/starbucks-please-dont-take-away-my-gingerbread-latte-in-januar/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/28/starbucks-please-dont-take-away-my-gingerbread-latte-in-januar/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sbux/" rel="tag">Starbucks (SBUX)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="peppermint mocha at starbucks" id="vimage_1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/11/starbucks_holiday_coffee.jpg" />I remember the first time I tasted a gingerbread latte. It was the winter of 2000, and Starbucks Corporation (NASDAQ:SBUX) had just opened a new outlet a block away from my suburban condo. I hated the suburbs! But I loved those gingerbread lattes, they made me feel like home for the holidays. And let's face it: ginger and spice are delicious. I could eat them year-round.<br /><br />But, alas, in January the gingerbread latte disappeared, preceded by the eggnog latte and closely followed by the peppermint mocha. Every season we await their return, their appearance on the specials board a better harbinger of the season than the weather, or the opening of the "Christmas" display at your local grocery store. And every season we mourn their passing.<br /><br />While I'm not about to suggest Starbucks move the eggnog latte to its permanent menu, serving it alongside tangerine Frappuccinos this summer, I think the company would receive dividends in customer goodwill and extra sales if it extended the holiday beverage season through at least March. Let's put it this way: I love the peppermint mochas so much I'll go to Starbucks to buy them, even though I like the service and the coffee at my neighborhood alternative indy coffee shop better.<br /><br />And I still love them in March. Surprisingly enough, my tastes don't change between December 26th and February 15th! And I'm not the only one. <a href="http://www.quicksilverweb.net/sbucks/sbcharts.htm">According to Starbucks Drinks Simplified</a>, the eggnog latte is so popular "People start asking about it in September, but on average these aren't sold until mid-November sometime."<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/28/starbucks-please-dont-take-away-my-gingerbread-latte-in-januar/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Starbucks, please don't take away my gingerbread latte in January!</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/28/starbucks-please-dont-take-away-my-gingerbread-latte-in-januar/">Starbucks, please don't take away my gingerbread latte in January!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 28 Nov 2006 16:23:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/28/starbucks-please-dont-take-away-my-gingerbread-latte-in-januar/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/709059/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/28/starbucks-please-dont-take-away-my-gingerbread-latte-in-januar/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>christmas</category><category>coffee</category><category>eggnog</category><category>eggnog latte</category><category>EggnogLatte</category><category>gingerbread</category><category>gingerbread latte</category><category>GingerbreadLatte</category><category>holiday</category><category>holiday beverages</category><category>holiday drinks</category><category>holiday lattes</category><category>holiday specials</category><category>HolidayBeverages</category><category>HolidayDrinks</category><category>HolidayLattes</category><category>HolidaySpecials</category><category>latte</category><category>peppermint mocha</category><category>PeppermintMocha</category><category>sbux</category><category>special lattes</category><category>SpecialLattes</category><category>specials</category><category>starbucks</category><category>starbucks christmas</category><category>starbucks holiday</category><category>starbucks mocha</category><category>StarbucksChristmas</category><category>StarbucksHoliday</category><category>StarbucksMocha</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 16:23:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Coca-Cola (KO) to challenge Starbucks (SBUX)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/07/coca-cola-ko-to-challenge-starbucks-sbux/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/07/coca-cola-ko-to-challenge-starbucks-sbux/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/07/coca-cola-ko-to-challenge-starbucks-sbux/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/press-releases/" rel="tag">Press Releases</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/launches/" rel="tag">Launches</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sbux/" rel="tag">Starbucks (SBUX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ko/" rel="tag">Coca-Cola (KO)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" id="vimage_1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/09/far-coast.jpg" />Here's something to read while sipping your morning coffee! Coca-Cola simply refuses to be KO'd. The company got a bit of good press recently when an Indian newspaper <a href="http://www.hindustantimes.com/news/181_1786253,001302440000.htm">reported pesticide levels in Pepsi</a> products three times over the limit, while Coca-Cola passed the tests. I'm still dizzy from wondering why pesticides were found in the first place! This may be the nail in the coffin for some faithful consumers out there.<br /><br />But, maybe Coca-Cola doesn't want you drinking carbonated beverages anymore. <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/01/coke-moves-into-trendy-coffee-market/">As my colleague Michael Canfield covered Sept 1</a>, as baby boomers move towards healthier choices, Coca-Cola is eying Starbuck's lucrative territory. Coca-Cola is going premium with high-end retail outlets offering a variety of freshly brewed espressos, chai teas, cappuccinos and lattes. A recent press release announced the launching of the "<em>Far Coast</em>" brand to fill this niche market. After all, if you're willing to hand over $4, $5 to buy a plastic cup (my theory), why not hand it over to Coca-Cola? Are the coffees really that different?<br /><br />Coca-Cola chose the multicultural city of Toronto, Canada (where I currently live) to be the launching pad for its "concept store" on Bloor Street yesterday. In a country fanatical about its Tim Horton's coffee, the premium market place has seen much competition. Starbucks has been able to carve out a very respectable market share. Therefore, Far Coast will have to do some serious catching up! Coca-Cola revealed that more stores will be opening soon in Oslo and Singapore (coincidently my birth country!).<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/07/coca-cola-ko-to-challenge-starbucks-sbux/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Coca-Cola (KO) to challenge Starbucks (SBUX)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/07/coca-cola-ko-to-challenge-starbucks-sbux/">Coca-Cola (KO) to challenge Starbucks (SBUX)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 07 Sep 2006 07:42:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/01/coke-moves-into-trendy-coffee-market/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/07/coca-cola-ko-to-challenge-starbucks-sbux/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/664927/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/07/coca-cola-ko-to-challenge-starbucks-sbux/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Coffee</category><category>coke</category><category>KO</category><category>latte</category><category>sbux</category><category>Starbucks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Vince Chan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 07:42:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Economy squeezes rich: Starbucks, Whole Foods falter, Burger King benefits?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/08/economy-squeezes-rich-starbucks-whole-foods-falter-burger-kin/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/08/economy-squeezes-rich-starbucks-whole-foods-falter-burger-kin/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/08/economy-squeezes-rich-starbucks-whole-foods-falter-burger-kin/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sbux/" rel="tag">Starbucks (SBUX)</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?t=3m&amp;s=SBUX&amp;l=on&amp;z=m&amp;q=l&amp;c=wfmi,pfcb,wsm&amp;c=%5eGSPC"><img id="vimage_1" alt="starbucks, williams-sonoma, pf changs and whole foods vs. s&amp;p" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/08/sbux_vs_sp.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" /></a>Writing for <em>Slate</em> magazine, Daniel Gross has a history of making sweeping generalizations based on the fortunes of the latte. <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2147256/?nav=ais">This week, he's analyzing</a> the same <a href="http://sbux.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/03/starbucks-releases-3q-earnings/">reports</a> <a href="http://sbux.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/05/starbucks-same-store-sales-my-own-theory-is-quality/">we</a> <a href="http://sbux.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/04/starbucks-share-price-plunge-is-its-business-maturing/">agonized</a> <a href="http://sbux.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/04/why-i-invested-in-starbucks/">over</a> last week: that Starbucks same-store sales were falling, because (<a href="http://sbux.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/04/starbucks-cfo-complains-the-street-over-emphasis-service-slowdow/">Howard Schulz said</a>) customers were tired of waiting in line for frappuccinos. Gross' theory is an interesting one, and he has <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?t=3m&amp;s=SBUX&amp;l=on&amp;z=m&amp;q=l&amp;c=wfmi,pfcb,wsm&amp;c=%5eGSPC">charts to back it up</a>: he says that Starbucks, like Whole Foods, P.F. Chang's, and Williams-Sonoma, are going through a trough thanks to the decline in the "ability and willingness" of high-income consumers to pay top dollar for a venti coconut latte; organic, farm-raised salmon; $8 lettuce wraps; and an Emile Henry pie plate in a different color for every holiday meal.</p>
<p><a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?t=3m&amp;s=SBUX&amp;l=on&amp;z=m&amp;q=l&amp;c=wfmi%2Cwsm%2Cbkc%2Cdg&amp;c=%5EGSPC"><img id="vimage_3" alt="starbucks, dollar general, williams sonoma, burger king, whole foods" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/08/sbux_vs_bkc.jpg?1155061531216" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" /></a>Instead, he says, these consumers are trading down to Burger King (and, one would imagine, Dunkin Donuts for coffee; Trader Joe's for slabs of frozen salmon; and Dollar General for 2/$1 pie plates). Of course, I can make charts, too, and <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?t=3m&amp;s=SBUX&amp;l=on&amp;z=m&amp;q=l&amp;c=wfmi%2Cwsm%2Cbkc%2Cdg&amp;c=%5EGSPC">when I add DG (Dollar General) and BKC (Burger King) to the mix</a>, I discover that their boats are falling with the same tide that's bringing down the luxe choices. It's harder to sell things to the poor, too!</p>
<p>Gross' theory is this: "the cost of living well is rising more rapidly than the overall cost of living." My theory is more like, "people are getting cheaper, and that goes for all of y'all."</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/08/economy-squeezes-rich-starbucks-whole-foods-falter-burger-kin/">Economy squeezes rich: Starbucks, Whole Foods falter, Burger King benefits?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 08 Aug 2006 14:22:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.slate.com/id/2147256/?nav=ais>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/08/economy-squeezes-rich-starbucks-whole-foods-falter-burger-kin/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/652231/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/08/economy-squeezes-rich-starbucks-whole-foods-falter-burger-kin/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bkg</category><category>burger king</category><category>BurgerKing</category><category>economic</category><category>economic effect</category><category>EconomicEffect</category><category>economy</category><category>latte</category><category>rich</category><category>starbucks</category><category>wealthy</category><category>wfmi</category><category>whole foods</category><category>WholeFoods</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 14:22:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Starbucks and bovine growth hormone]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/10/starbucks-and-bovine-growth-hormone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/10/starbucks-and-bovine-growth-hormone/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/10/starbucks-and-bovine-growth-hormone/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/press-releases/" rel="tag">Press Releases</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sbux/" rel="tag">Starbucks (SBUX)</a></p><img id="vimage_1" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/07/starbucksbw.gif" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />An organization called The Organic Consumers Association (OCA) issued a <a title="Starbucks Still Serving Up Coffee Drinks Laced with Monsanto's Bovine Growth Hormone (press release)" href="http://www.newstarget.com/019488.html">press release</a> last week objecting that the Starbucks Corporation [<a title="SBUX: Starbucks Corp Quote, News &amp; Summary - AOL Money &amp; Finance" href="http://aolsvc.pf.aol.com/usw/quotes/quotesandnews?sym=SBUX&amp;exch=">SBUX</a>] is still serving milk containing Bovine Growth Hormone (rBGH --<em>a.k.a.</em> <a title="Bovine somatotropin - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RBGH">Bovine somatotropin</a>), despite what OCA claims is a five-year old commitment by the coffee company to offer alternatives to consumers. The OCA now believes that earlier promise was a "ploy" by the corporation to grab a feel-good headline. <br /><br />The same press release also says Starbucks <em>does</em> offer alternatives upon request but makes no effort to inform customers or employees of the choice. Not sure I follow that, what do the employees think that rBGH free organic milk is for, if they in fact have it on hand? This is same hormone that folks like <a title="FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE" href="http://www.newswire1.net/NW2006/C_BJS_VT/benjerry/">Ben &amp; Jerry's</a> (scroll down to the bottom of the link) won't allow to touch their own fat and sugar-laden treats and is said to cause udder-inflamation in dairy cows and leaves antibiotic residue in the milk that is then consumed by humans. <br /><br />There are so many health alerts issued, studies done, boycotts called for, on a seemingly increasing variety of issues every day, that I cannot see this one as a major factor for investors. Featuring "organic milk" on the menu board, however, couldn't hurt. Who doesn't like choice? I like to believe I do, at least. That's assuming I can <span style="FONT-STYLE: italic">find</span> the new choice among the several hundred possible drink combinations already on offer.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/10/starbucks-and-bovine-growth-hormone/">Starbucks and bovine growth hormone</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 10 Jul 2006 11:41:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.newstarget.com/019488.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/10/starbucks-and-bovine-growth-hormone/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/639924/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/10/starbucks-and-bovine-growth-hormone/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bovine Grown Hormone</category><category>BovineGrownHormone</category><category>Coffee</category><category>Coffee drinks</category><category>CoffeeDrinks</category><category>latte</category><category>SBUX</category><category>Starbucks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Canfield]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 11:41:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
