<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Yahoo! Lays Off 600 Employees]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/14/yahoo-lays-off-600-employees/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/14/yahoo-lays-off-600-employees/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/14/yahoo-lays-off-600-employees/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/05/yahoo-1274221362.jpg"  alt="Yahoo! (YHOO)" />For a lot of Yahoo! Inc. (<a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) employees, the holiday season is going to be less cheerful than expected as the company announced today that it was <a href="http://www.aolnews.com/story/yahoo-hands-out-600-layoff-notices-for/1461832/">laying off around 600 employees</a>.<br />
<br />
The most recent layoffs are not that big or a surprise, as analysts have been speculating for the past few weeks that the company would reduce it payroll before the end of the year in hopes of breaking its recent financial woes.<br />
<br />
Yahoo! is headquartered in California, a state that is already dealing with very high unemployment. These layoffs are going to add to California's current 12.4% unemployment rate, which is sharply higher than the national average of 9.8%.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/14/yahoo-lays-off-600-employees/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Yahoo! Lays Off 600 Employees</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/14/yahoo-lays-off-600-employees/">Yahoo! Lays Off 600 Employees</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 14 Dec 2010 18:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/14/yahoo-lays-off-600-employees/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19760845/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/14/yahoo-lays-off-600-employees/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AOL</category><category>Bing</category><category>Carol Bartz</category><category>employees</category><category>featured</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>layoffs</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>search engine</category><category>Yahoo</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 18:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[ADP's Private Employment Report: Useful for Investors?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/06/adps-private-employment-report-useful-for-investors/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/06/adps-private-employment-report-useful-for-investors/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/06/adps-private-employment-report-useful-for-investors/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="ADP logo"  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/adp-logo-240.jpg" />Automatic Data Processing's (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/automatic-data-processing-inc/adp/nas">ADP</a>) September private sector employment report -- which came in at a worse-than-expected loss of <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/a-cruel-september-for-private-sector-jobs-with-39-000-cut/19662817/">39,000 jobs</a> -- is not a data point that investors should ignore. That said, investors need to retain a proper perspective regarding the metric. </p>
<p>Institutional investors, public policy makers, and economists monitor the ADP report primarily because it's the last, monthly, national job tally before the U.S. Department of Labor's monthly, non-farm, payroll report -- the nation's best and most comprehensive survey of labor market conditions, called the <a href="http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.toc.htm">Employment Situation</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/06/adps-private-employment-report-useful-for-investors/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>ADP's Private Employment Report: Useful for Investors?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/06/adps-private-employment-report-useful-for-investors/">ADP's Private Employment Report: Useful for Investors?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 06 Oct 2010 18:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/06/adps-private-employment-report-useful-for-investors/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19663724/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/06/adps-private-employment-report-useful-for-investors/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>adp</category><category>jobs</category><category>layoffs</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 18:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Consol Energy to Close Mine]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/01/consol-energy-to-close-mine/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/01/consol-energy-to-close-mine/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/01/consol-energy-to-close-mine/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/10/consol-energy.jpg" alt="Consol Energy (CNX) logo" />Friday morning, Consol Energy (<a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/consol-energy-incorporated/cnx/nys">CNX</a>) announced that it will <a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/rtn/pr/consol-energy-to-close-mine-84/rfid372724319/?channel=pf">close its Mine 84</a> near Washington, Penn. The closure will cost roughly 60 employees their jobs.</p>
<p>The employees who lose their jobs will have the choice of taking a position with another Consol operation. The company will conduct the layoffs for 14 days, starting at 12:01 AM on December 1 -- talk about your happy holiday season. The good news is that these workers will be able to look for alternative work before the layoffs take place.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/01/consol-energy-to-close-mine/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Consol Energy to Close Mine</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/01/consol-energy-to-close-mine/">Consol Energy to Close Mine</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 01 Oct 2010 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/01/consol-energy-to-close-mine/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19657009/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/01/consol-energy-to-close-mine/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CNX</category><category>Consol Energy</category><category>inthenews</category><category>job losses</category><category>layoffs</category><category>mining</category><category>technical analysis</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Whitney: Wall Street to Cut 80,000 Jobs]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/08/whitney-wall-street-to-cut-80-000-jobs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/08/whitney-wall-street-to-cut-80-000-jobs/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/08/whitney-wall-street-to-cut-80-000-jobs/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/nyse-flag-240.jpg" alt="Wall Street" />Meredith Whitney, of the Meredith Whitney Group, told Bloomberg News that she expects that securities firms around the world will <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/print/2010-09-07/wall-street-firms-will-cut-up-to-80-000-jobs-over-18-months-whitney-says.html">cut 80,000 jobs</a>. This would be about 10% from current levels. The cuts would begin after 2010 compensation payments.</p>
<p>Since the crash, Wall Street firms have been undergoing structural changes. The first wave saw cuts of 330,000 jobs around the world. Some firms have hired some personnel back; however, these small hires do not come close to the jobs lost.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/08/whitney-wall-street-to-cut-80-000-jobs/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Whitney: Wall Street to Cut 80,000 Jobs</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/08/whitney-wall-street-to-cut-80-000-jobs/">Whitney: Wall Street to Cut 80,000 Jobs</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 08 Sep 2010 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/08/whitney-wall-street-to-cut-80-000-jobs/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19625070/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/08/whitney-wall-street-to-cut-80-000-jobs/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><category>layoffs</category><category>Meredith Whitney</category><category>Wall Street</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[McDonald's May Fire Ronald McDonald]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/05/mcdonalds-may-fire-ronald-mcdonald/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/05/mcdonalds-may-fire-ronald-mcdonald/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/05/mcdonalds-may-fire-ronald-mcdonald/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mcd/" rel="tag">McDonald's (MCD)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/a-rod-ronald-mcdonald.jpg" alt="" />Ronald McDonald debuted in 1963 with TV personality Willard Scott donning the clown costume for the first time in an ad spot for McDonald's (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/mcdonald-s-corporation/mcd/nys">MCD</a>). But if some health advocates have their way, the fiery-haired clown's days are numbered.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/lifestyle/health/2010/04/01/2010-04-01_polls_got_beef_with_ronald.html" target="_blank">Corporate Accountability International</a> is calling McDonald's mascot a "deep-fried Joe Camel for the 21st Century" and is sponsoring "Retire Ronald" events at several locations around the country. The group claims that Ronald McDonald is a spokesperson for childhood obesity, and they want him cut from the payroll pronto.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/05/mcdonalds-may-fire-ronald-mcdonald/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>McDonald's May Fire Ronald McDonald</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/05/mcdonalds-may-fire-ronald-mcdonald/">McDonald's May Fire Ronald McDonald</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 05 Apr 2010 08:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/05/mcdonalds-may-fire-ronald-mcdonald/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19424533/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/05/mcdonalds-may-fire-ronald-mcdonald/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>childhood obesity</category><category>fast food</category><category>featured</category><category>health</category><category>layoffs</category><category>MCD</category><category>mcdonalds</category><category>michelle obama</category><category>obese kids</category><category>obesity</category><category>ronald mcdonald</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Reeves]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 08:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Winter Weather May Skew February Jobs Report Data]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/04/winter-weather-may-skew-february-jobs-report-data/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/04/winter-weather-may-skew-february-jobs-report-data/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/04/winter-weather-may-skew-february-jobs-report-data/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/melly-shoveling.jpg" />To say the Friday's February monthly jobs report from the U.S. Labor Department is a data point of consequence is an understatement. <br /> <br /> Given the depth and length of the U.S. recession -- one that has seen more than 8.4 million jobs lost and the unemployment rate rise to 9.7% -- each monthly data point is a tell-tale stat, as it speaks directly to how well U.S. policy makers are addressing the nation's No. 1 economic problem: job creation.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/04/winter-weather-may-skew-february-jobs-report-data/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Winter Weather May Skew February Jobs Report Data</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/04/winter-weather-may-skew-february-jobs-report-data/">Winter Weather May Skew February Jobs Report Data</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 04 Mar 2010 16:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/04/winter-weather-may-skew-february-jobs-report-data/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19383536/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/04/winter-weather-may-skew-february-jobs-report-data/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>jobs</category><category>layoffs</category><category>unemployment rate</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 16:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[December Layoffs Lowest in a Year]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/06/december-layoffs-lowest-in-a-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/06/december-layoffs-lowest-in-a-year/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/06/december-layoffs-lowest-in-a-year/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/03/wantadspic.jpg" />The job market looked grim at the beginning of 2009, but as we crossed into 2010, there seems to be a glimmer of hope. We still aren't seeing jobs added yet, but at least the cuts are headed in the right direction. Last month, according to <a href="http://www.challengergray.com" target="_blank">Challenger, Gray &amp; Christmas</a>, announced layoffs fell 10% to 45,094. This is the lowest level seen since December 2007, exactly two years earlier, when there were only 44,416 job cuts. The most recent tally is also off 10% from November's 50,349, making it the fifth month in a row that layoffs have decreased. Since July, the stat has fallen 14% a month, on average.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/06/december-layoffs-lowest-in-a-year/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>December Layoffs Lowest in a Year</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/06/december-layoffs-lowest-in-a-year/">December Layoffs Lowest in a Year</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 06 Jan 2010 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/06/december-layoffs-lowest-in-a-year/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19304909/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/06/december-layoffs-lowest-in-a-year/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>auto industry</category><category>Challenger Gray Christmas</category><category>featured</category><category>job market</category><category>job market results</category><category>layoffs</category><category>retail</category><category>retail sector</category><category>retailers</category><category>unemployed</category><category>unemployment</category><category>unemployment rate</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Layoffs slowing down, but that doesn't mean hiring]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/02/layoffs-slowing-down-but-that-doesnt-mean-hiring/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/02/layoffs-slowing-down-but-that-doesnt-mean-hiring/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/02/layoffs-slowing-down-but-that-doesnt-mean-hiring/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><p><img height="145" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/layoffs.jpg" width="200" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Planned job cuts fell to 50,349 in November, the lowest level in nearly two years. The 9.6% decline from October, according to <a href="http://www.challengergray.com" target="_blank">Challenger, Gray &amp; Christmas</a>, is the fourth month in a row in which layoffs fell. Also, from November 2008 to November 2009, planned reductions plunged 72% from 181,671. November was the worst month of 2008.</p>
<p>Challenger, Gray &amp; Christmas sees companies slowing down the axe-swinging, a trend that has continued through the back half of 2009. Since July 1, 2009, employers have cut an average of 69,252 jobs each month. Through the end of June, the average was 149,446. The aggressive layoff pace in the first two quarters of 2009 have pushed this year's total ahead of 2008, with the year-to-date planned reduction total reaching 1,242,936 last month. That beats the 2008 full-year total of 1,223,993 and tops the November 2008 amount of 1,057,645 by 17.5%.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/02/layoffs-slowing-down-but-that-doesnt-mean-hiring/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Layoffs slowing down, but that doesn't mean hiring</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/02/layoffs-slowing-down-but-that-doesnt-mean-hiring/">Layoffs slowing down, but that doesn't mean hiring</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 02 Dec 2009 09:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/02/layoffs-slowing-down-but-that-doesnt-mean-hiring/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19261425/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/02/layoffs-slowing-down-but-that-doesnt-mean-hiring/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Challenger Gray Christmas</category><category>ChallengerGrayChristmas</category><category>inthenews</category><category>job cuts</category><category>JobCuts</category><category>layoff</category><category>layoffs</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 09:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[NYT News Service migrates after cut]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/nyt-news-service-migrates-after-cuts/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/nyt-news-service-migrates-after-cuts/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/nyt-news-service-migrates-after-cuts/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/07/nyt-new-york-times-logo.jpg" alt="" />This winter, a bit more of <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/NewYork/">New York</a> is headed to <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Florida/">Florida</a>. <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Layoffs/">Layoffs</a> for 2010 have already been announced for the New York Times Company(<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/13/business/media/13times.html?_r=1&amp;ref=media" target="_blank">NYT</a>). The New York Times News Service will lose 25 editorial positions next year and shift the service's editing to one of the parent company's Florida <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/newspapers/">newspapers</a>. At present, the news service has 30 editorial jobs. Some of the layoffs will occur in February, and the others will happen in May.</p>
<p>These layoffs are not included in the planned slashing of 100 jobs in the flagship newspaper's newsroom -- a workforce reduction of 8% that should take hold by the end of the year. The NY Times is also ceasing pension contributions for nonunion employees.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/nyt-news-service-migrates-after-cuts/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>NYT News Service migrates after cut</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/nyt-news-service-migrates-after-cuts/">NYT News Service migrates after cut</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/nyt-news-service-migrates-after-cuts/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19236718/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/nyt-news-service-migrates-after-cuts/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>gainesville</category><category>inthenews</category><category>layoffs</category><category>new york times</category><category>new york times co.</category><category>new york times company</category><category>newspaper industry</category><category>newspaper stocks</category><category>NewspaperIndustry</category><category>newspapers</category><category>NewspaperStocks</category><category>NewYorkTimes</category><category>NewYorkTimesCo.</category><category>NewYorkTimesCompany</category><category>nyt</category><category>nytimes</category><category>unions</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Layoffs slowing down, but upturn isn't coming yet]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/07/layoffs-slowing-down-but-upturn-isn-t-coming-yet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/07/layoffs-slowing-down-but-upturn-isn-t-coming-yet/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/07/layoffs-slowing-down-but-upturn-isn-t-coming-yet/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img width="200" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="145" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/layoffs.jpg" /></p>
<div> </div>
<p>Employers are planning to cut fewer jobs for the third month in a row, according to a new report that   <span style="float: left; margin-right: 10px; margin-top: 7px;"><script> digg_url = 'http://digg.com/business_finance/Layoffs_slowing_down_but_upturn_isn_t_coming_yet'; </script> <script src=" http://digg.com/api/diggthis.js"></script></span>  <a href="http://www.challengergray.com/" target="_blank">Challenger, Gray &amp; Christmas</a> has supplied to <em>BloggingStocks</em>. </p>
<p>The executive outplacement firm says that the number of planned reductions fell 16% in October to 55,679 positions -- from 66,404 in September. Last month's level was the lowest seen since March 2008, when 53,579 layoffs were planned. And, it's 51% lower than October 2008's 112,884 result. Planned staff reductions have fallen in eight of the past 10 months.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/07/layoffs-slowing-down-but-upturn-isn-t-coming-yet/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Layoffs slowing down, but upturn isn't coming yet</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/07/layoffs-slowing-down-but-upturn-isn-t-coming-yet/">Layoffs slowing down, but upturn isn't coming yet</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 07 Nov 2009 14:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/07/layoffs-slowing-down-but-upturn-isn-t-coming-yet/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19227245/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/07/layoffs-slowing-down-but-upturn-isn-t-coming-yet/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>auto industry</category><category>auto sector</category><category>challenger gray christmas</category><category>downsizing</category><category>job creation</category><category>job cuts</category><category>jobless recovery</category><category>layoffs</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 14:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Employee productivity up close to 10%]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/employee-productivity-up-close-to-10/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/employee-productivity-up-close-to-10/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/employee-productivity-up-close-to-10/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/unemploymentpicture.jpg" />Work smarter not harder. Do more with less. Increase your output. Become more productive. </p>
<p>You've heard all this before, right? What it all means is that <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/layoffs/">layoffs</a> are coming, and the survivors are going to have to take on a hell of a lot more work, with no increase in support, resources or compensation. As cuts come, the survivors fight to survive, and succeeding means that a new benchmark is set. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33651961/ns/business-stocks_and_economy/">If you can survive without the help you used to have, it's easier to defer hiring for a while</a>. </p>
<br />
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/employee-productivity-up-close-to-10/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Employee productivity up close to 10%</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/employee-productivity-up-close-to-10/">Employee productivity up close to 10%</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33651961/ns/business-stocks_and_economy/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/employee-productivity-up-close-to-10/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19226210/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/employee-productivity-up-close-to-10/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>department of labor</category><category>DepartmentOfLabor</category><category>economy</category><category>featured</category><category>layoffs</category><category>productivity</category><category>recession</category><category>unemployment</category><category>unemployment rate</category><category>UnemploymentRate</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Time and WSJ to lay off more]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/time-and-wsj-to-lay-off-more/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/time-and-wsj-to-lay-off-more/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/time-and-wsj-to-lay-off-more/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/wall_street_journal_240.jpg" alt="" />The mayhem in the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/media/">media</a> industry continues. The <a href="http://www.wsj.com" target="_blank">Wall Street Journal</a>, a <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas" target="_blank">News Corp</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas" target="_blank">NWS</a>) property, is <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/fishbowlny/the_revolving_door/more_business_journalism_layoffs_wall_street_journal_closes_boston_office_141650.asp" target="_blank">closing its Boston bureau and sending nine employees into the wind</a>. The newswire and <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com" target="_blank">MarketWatch</a> operations are going to stay open in <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Boston/">Boston</a>, however, with no headcount impact. </p>
<p>The Journal doesn't have any plans to close other offices, according to a memo by managing editor Robert Thomson: "there are no plans, nascent or otherwise, to close any other U.S. or international bureau." The <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/WSJ/">WSJ</a> will still support an "investigative function" in Boston, but the New York-based Money and Investing team will cover Boston's <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/mutualfund/">mutual fund</a> industry, which boasts such heavy hitters as <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Fidelity/">Fidelity</a>. </p>
<p>At the same time, magazine company <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/TimeInc/">Time Inc</a>., owned by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys" target="_blank">Time Warner</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys" target="_blank">TWX</a>) is looking to cut $100 million in expenses, and <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/layoffs/">layoffs</a> will undoubtedly figure into the equation. The company that owns <a href="http://www.time.com" target="_blank">Time</a>, <a href="http://www.fortune.com" target="_blank">Fortune</a>, <a href="http://www.people.com" target="_blank">People</a> and <a href="http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/" target="_blank">Sports Illustrated</a> - and falls under the same umbrella as <a href="http://www.aol.com" target="_blank">AOL</a>, which owns <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com" target="_blank">BloggingStocks</a> - is feeling the squeeze of a media recession that's even worse than the regular recession we've all been battling for what feels like decades. </p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/time-and-wsj-to-lay-off-more/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Time and WSJ to lay off more</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/time-and-wsj-to-lay-off-more/">Time and WSJ to lay off more</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/time-and-wsj-to-lay-off-more/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19216496/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/time-and-wsj-to-lay-off-more/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aol</category><category>boston</category><category>boston globe</category><category>boston.com</category><category>BostonGlobe</category><category>conde nast</category><category>CondeNast</category><category>cost cutting</category><category>CostCutting</category><category>fortune</category><category>graydon carter</category><category>GraydonCarter</category><category>inthenews</category><category>layoff</category><category>layoffs</category><category>magazine</category><category>magazines</category><category>marketwatch</category><category>mckinsey</category><category>mckinseyco.</category><category>MutualFunds</category><category>new york</category><category>new york times</category><category>new york times co.</category><category>news corp</category><category>news corpb nws</category><category>news corporation</category><category>NewsCorp</category><category>NewsCorporation</category><category>NewYorkTimes</category><category>nyt</category><category>nytimes</category><category>PeopleMagazine</category><category>SportsIllustrated</category><category>time</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeInc</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>twx</category><category>VanityFair</category><category>wsj</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Unemployment up in 23 states, 15 set records ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/22/unemployment-up-in-23-states-15-set-records/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/22/unemployment-up-in-23-states-15-set-records/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/22/unemployment-up-in-23-states-15-set-records/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/10/rsz_unemploy_ap.jpg" alt="" />The <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/unemploymentrate/">unemployment rate</a> increased in 23 states in September, with 43 reporting job losses for the month (though not at an accelerating rate). This does signal that we're (hopefully) in the early stages of an economic recovery ... <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33413805/ns/business-stocks_and_economy/" target="_blank">though this can also mean that some job seekers have just given up</a> (and are no longer counted). </p>
<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Layoffs/">Layoffs</a> have slowed down a bit, but companies aren't crazy about taking on new bodies. So far, 600,000 people have dropped out of the hunt. Unemployment now sits at 9.8%.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/22/unemployment-up-in-23-states-15-set-records/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Unemployment up in 23 states, 15 set records </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/22/unemployment-up-in-23-states-15-set-records/">Unemployment up in 23 states, 15 set records </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 22 Oct 2009 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/22/unemployment-up-in-23-states-15-set-records/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19205364/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/22/unemployment-up-in-23-states-15-set-records/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><category>jobless</category><category>jobless claims</category><category>jobless rate</category><category>layoff</category><category>layoffs</category><category>manufacturing</category><category>manufacturing jobs</category><category>midwest</category><category>unemployed</category><category>unemployment</category><category>unemployment rate</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Yahoo profit triples year-over-year]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/21/yahoo-profit-triples-year-over-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/21/yahoo-profit-triples-year-over-year/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/21/yahoo-profit-triples-year-over-year/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/yhoo-yahoo!-logo.jpg" />The number two search engine in the United States turned in a fantastic third quarter, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/yahoo-preview-will-stock-see-a-bid-after-q3-report/">far ahead of expectations</a>. Cost-cutting, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/layoffs/">layoffs</a> and business divestitures led to a surge in <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo</a>'s (NASDAQ: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) profits and a <a target="_blank" href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=azVdW1WN4goY">4.8% increase in share price in extended trading on Tuesday evening</a>. Net income more than tripled to $186.1 million (13 cents per share) from the third quarter of 2008's result of $54.3 million (4 cents a share). Sales (exclusive of fees passed to partner sites) reached $1.13 billion, slightly above the $1.12 billion expected by analysts, according to a Bloomberg survey. <br />
<br />
With the advertising market in rough shape and competition from <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) continually rising, Yahoo refocused on its core properties: the home page, messaging and mobile services. The company trimmed what it didn't need, which is why it was able to boost its earnings even with a decline in revenue. Increased ad revenue from auto manufacturers, travel companies and consumer product manufacturers also helped.<br />
<br />
Yahoo's chief financial officer, Timothy Morse, says that the company's markets are "starting to stabilize." Of course, Yahoo itself must be doing something right: its share price is up 41% this year.</p>
<p><br />
 </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/21/yahoo-profit-triples-year-over-year/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Yahoo profit triples year-over-year</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/21/yahoo-profit-triples-year-over-year/">Yahoo profit triples year-over-year</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 21 Oct 2009 08:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=azVdW1WN4goY>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/21/yahoo-profit-triples-year-over-year/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19203400/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/21/yahoo-profit-triples-year-over-year/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>advertising</category><category>featured</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>layoffs</category><category>microsoft</category><category>msft</category><category>online ad</category><category>online ad sales</category><category>online ads</category><category>online advertising</category><category>OnlineAds</category><category>OnlineAdSales</category><category>OnlineAdvertising</category><category>search</category><category>search engine</category><category>search engines</category><category>SearchEngine</category><category>SearchEngines</category><category>yahoo</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 08:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Fewer job cuts in September, is relief coming?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/01/fewer-job-cuts-in-september-is-relief-coming/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/01/fewer-job-cuts-in-september-is-relief-coming/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/01/fewer-job-cuts-in-september-is-relief-coming/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/indices/" rel="tag">Indices</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/03/wantadspic.jpg" alt="" />Layoff announcements hit their lowest level since March 2008 last month, signaling market stabilization. Global outplacement consulting firm <a target="_blank" href="http://www.challengergray.com/">Challenger, Gray &amp; Christmas Inc.</a> put the number of cuts at 66,404 for September, a 13% decline from July's 76,456. Year-over-year, the number of layoffs announced is down 30%, and September was the fourth month in a row in which job cuts fell relative to the same month a year earlier. </p>
<p>Planned job cuts reached 240,233 for the third quarter of 2009, according to Challenger, its lowest level since the first quarter of 2008, when there were 200,656 planned layoffs. For the third quarter of this year, job cuts fell 24.5% from the previous quarter's 318,165, and it's off 16.3% from 287,142 in the third quarter of 2009. At the beginning of 2009, the planned layoff rate reached a seven-year high of 578,510. Since then, the planned layoff rate fell 58.5%.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/01/fewer-job-cuts-in-september-is-relief-coming/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Fewer job cuts in September, is relief coming?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/01/fewer-job-cuts-in-september-is-relief-coming/">Fewer job cuts in September, is relief coming?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 01 Oct 2009 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/01/fewer-job-cuts-in-september-is-relief-coming/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19180598/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/01/fewer-job-cuts-in-september-is-relief-coming/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>auto</category><category>auto industry</category><category>automotive</category><category>automotive industry</category><category>challenger</category><category>challenger gray christmas</category><category>government jobs</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jobless claims</category><category>jobless rate</category><category>layoffs</category><category>retail industry</category><category>retail jobs</category><category>retailers</category><category>unemployed</category><category>unemployment rates</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Unemployment numbers signal need for new growth sectors]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/08/unemployment-numbers-signal-need-for-new-growth-sectors/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/08/unemployment-numbers-signal-need-for-new-growth-sectors/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/08/unemployment-numbers-signal-need-for-new-growth-sectors/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/04/labor.jpg" width="160" height="160" />The dominant theme in August's job report from the <a href="http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm">U.S. Department of Labor</a>? August was another month of broad-based job losses, but the pace of job cutbacks is lessening.</p>
<p>As has been the case since the recession started in December 2007, construction (65,000 job cuts), manufacturing (63,000), financial services (28,000), and wholesale trade (17,000), again registered large job losses, while health care was one of few gainers, adding 28,000 jobs.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/08/unemployment-numbers-signal-need-for-new-growth-sectors/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Unemployment numbers signal need for new growth sectors</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/08/unemployment-numbers-signal-need-for-new-growth-sectors/">Unemployment numbers signal need for new growth sectors</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 08 Sep 2009 11:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/08/unemployment-numbers-signal-need-for-new-growth-sectors/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19153407/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/08/unemployment-numbers-signal-need-for-new-growth-sectors/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><category>jobs</category><category>layoffs</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 11:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Job cuts continue to be a drag on economic recovery]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/02/job-cuts-continue-to-be-a-drag-on-economic-recovery/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/02/job-cuts-continue-to-be-a-drag-on-economic-recovery/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/02/job-cuts-continue-to-be-a-drag-on-economic-recovery/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/layoffs.jpg" width="220" height="160" alt="" />As we saw this morning, companies <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/02/job-cuts-slow-in-august-more-not-so-bad-news/">cut 298,000 jobs in August</a>, according to ADP. The forecast was for 250,000 jobs lost. The report also revised last month's decline to 360,000.</p>
<p>Well, the Labor Department's report is due out in two days, and it <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=a4yuz57GLJQA">may show a loss of 225,000 jobs</a>, according to a Bloomberg News survey.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/02/job-cuts-continue-to-be-a-drag-on-economic-recovery/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Job cuts continue to be a drag on economic recovery</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/02/job-cuts-continue-to-be-a-drag-on-economic-recovery/">Job cuts continue to be a drag on economic recovery</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 02 Sep 2009 15:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/02/job-cuts-continue-to-be-a-drag-on-economic-recovery/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19148442/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/02/job-cuts-continue-to-be-a-drag-on-economic-recovery/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ADP</category><category>consumer spending</category><category>economic recovery</category><category>inthenews</category><category>job cuts</category><category>Labor Department</category><category>layoffs</category><category>recession</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 15:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Nonfarm payroll data released tomorrow -- traders brace themselves]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/06/non-farm-payroll-data-released-tomorrow-traders-brace-themsel/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/06/non-farm-payroll-data-released-tomorrow-traders-brace-themsel/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/06/non-farm-payroll-data-released-tomorrow-traders-brace-themsel/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/unemploymentpicture.jpg" />It looks like tomorrow could very well become yet another 'brace yourself Friday' or another edition of "As The U.S. Economy Turns."</p>
<p>Still, hopefully it won't become another "down goes the Dow" day, although analysts and economists certainly haven't ruled the latter out. </p>
<p>The reason? The July 2009 jobs report, to be released by the U.S. Labor Department Friday at 8:30 a.m. EDT. Economists <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/markets/ecalendar/index.html">surveyed by Bloomberg News</a> expect the report to show that the nation lost 300,000 jobs in July, with the unemployment rate rising to 9.7% from 9.5% in June.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/06/non-farm-payroll-data-released-tomorrow-traders-brace-themsel/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Nonfarm payroll data released tomorrow -- traders brace themselves</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/06/non-farm-payroll-data-released-tomorrow-traders-brace-themsel/">Nonfarm payroll data released tomorrow -- traders brace themselves</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 06 Aug 2009 19:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/06/non-farm-payroll-data-released-tomorrow-traders-brace-themsel/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19121742/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/06/non-farm-payroll-data-released-tomorrow-traders-brace-themsel/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><category>job growth</category><category>jobs</category><category>layoffs</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 19:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apartment vacancies spiked in Q2 in U.S.]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/08/apartment-vacancies-spiked-in-q2-in-u-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/08/apartment-vacancies-spiked-in-q2-in-u-s/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/08/apartment-vacancies-spiked-in-q2-in-u-s/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/09/newyork_empire.jpg" alt="" /><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Apartment/">Apartment</a> vacancies in the United States hit their <a target="_blank" href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601213&amp;sid=a5YNzreTGxLw">highest level in 22 years in the second quarter of 2009</a>. Job losses are to blame, according to <a target="_blank" href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601213&amp;sid=a5YNzreTGxLw">Bloomberg</a>, as tenant demand falls when people don't have any income. Vacancies rose to 7.5% from 6.1% year-over-year, according to Reis Inc. But this still doesn't reach the 1987 level of 7.6%. In June, the U.S. unemployment rate hit a 26-year high, with payrolls dropping faster than expectations.</p>
<p>Conventional wisdom has it that potential homebuyers turn into renters when the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/jobmarket/">job market</a> softens. The rental pool is shrinking, however, leading to the high rate of apartment vacancies as landlords struggle to fill units. Asking rents for apartments fell 0.6% last quarter (for the second in a row), according to Reis, the largest fall since the company started to track this measure in 1999. Overall, asking rents (including other types of residences) were off 0.7% year-over-year, down to an average of $1,040 a month.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/08/apartment-vacancies-spiked-in-q2-in-u-s/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Apartment vacancies spiked in Q2 in U.S.</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/08/apartment-vacancies-spiked-in-q2-in-u-s/">Apartment vacancies spiked in Q2 in U.S.</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 08 Jul 2009 14:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601213&amp;sid=a5YNzreTGxLw>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/08/apartment-vacancies-spiked-in-q2-in-u-s/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19090242/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/08/apartment-vacancies-spiked-in-q2-in-u-s/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apartments</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>job market</category><category>JobMarket</category><category>layoffs</category><category>new york city</category><category>NewYorkCity</category><category>real estate</category><category>RealEstate</category><category>recession</category><category>rental market</category><category>RentalMarket</category><category>rentals</category><category>vacancies</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 14:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[News Corp.'s MySpace has cooled its heels, begins layoffs]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/18/news-corp-s-myspace-has-cooled-its-heels-begins-layoffs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/18/news-corp-s-myspace-has-cooled-its-heels-begins-layoffs/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/18/news-corp-s-myspace-has-cooled-its-heels-begins-layoffs/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a></p><p><img border="0" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/06/ms.jpg" />When <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas">News Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas">NWS</a>) bought MySpace.com for over $500 million back in 2005, some said it was the way Rupert Murdoch would charge into the digital media audience business in a big way. While that was true at the time, the digital world and its audience can become fickle and change rapidly as new web-based properties develop. It's pretty obvious by now that <a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-ct-myspace17-2009jun17,0,6726077.story">Facebook has leaped past MySpace</a> and is "the place" to be when it comes to social networking interaction (although Twitter is garnering all the buzz presently).</p>
<p>Why Did MySpace lose its way? MySpace evolved to become a portal, offering music downloads and other goodies, while Facebook kept its social networking status as a place where friends and associates could virtually connect. And there you have it -- MySpace didn't evolve as trends were created and rapidly changed.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/18/news-corp-s-myspace-has-cooled-its-heels-begins-layoffs/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>News Corp.'s MySpace has cooled its heels, begins layoffs</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/18/news-corp-s-myspace-has-cooled-its-heels-begins-layoffs/">News Corp.'s MySpace has cooled its heels, begins layoffs</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-ct-myspace17-2009jun17,0,6726077.story>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/18/news-corp-s-myspace-has-cooled-its-heels-begins-layoffs/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19069695/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/18/news-corp-s-myspace-has-cooled-its-heels-begins-layoffs/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Debra Aho Williamson</category><category>Facebook</category><category>layoffs</category><category>MySpace</category><category>News Corp.</category><category>NewsCorp.</category><category>Owen Van Natta</category><category>Rupert Murdoch</category><category>social networks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:30:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
