<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[SEC wants to make mutual funds easier to understand]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/11/sec-wants-to-make-funds-easier-to-understand/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/11/sec-wants-to-make-funds-easier-to-understand/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/11/sec-wants-to-make-funds-easier-to-understand/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/funds/" rel="tag">Mutual Funds</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a></p><p>SEC Chairman Chris Cox called on the mutual fund industry to join him in the "<a href="http://www.thestreet.com/funds/mutualfundinvesting/10356189.html">war on complexity</a>." Cox discussed the difficulties that investors have in comparing mutual funds using the <a href="http://sec.gov/edgar/searchedgar/webusers.htm">SEC's Edgar Database</a>. He also called for more disclosures about 401(k) fees and performance, saying that "We will continue to purge all the legalese and convert it to plain English. But getting rid of the gobbledygook is no easy task. But we want to give every investor the info to achieve sound investment decisions."</p>
<p>I'm highly skeptical about the odds of mutual funds making it easier for investors to compare expenses and performance because, if they did, most people wouldn't buy most mutual funds. If people had a solid understanding of mutual funds and the factors impacting their performance, pretty much everyone would buy the lowest cost index fund they could find. Needless to say, that wouldn't be good news for most investment management companies.</p>
<p>However, instead of complex disclosures and spreadsheets that 99% of individual investors really don't care about, I have a plan. Every mailing/advertisement/prospectus discussing a mutual fund should be required to contain a red piece of paper with the following:<br /><br /><strong>DEAR INVESTOR:</strong></p>
<p><strong>Most likely, the mutual fund that is soliciting your business brags about its track record and its management team's expertise. As an investor, there's something you need to know: None of that matters.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Past performance, Ivy League credentials, and colorful promotional literature have very little impact on a fund's future performance. Here's what matters: The expense ratio. By keeping your costs as low as possible, you will beat more than 80% of actively managed funds.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Investment legends including Warren Buffett, John Bogle, and Burton Malkiel (to say nothing of Ben Stein and Suze Orman) have all said that most investors should stick with passively managed, low-cost index mutual funds. If the fund being advertised here does not fit that description, we strongly advise you to toss the mailing into your recycling bin.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Best of luck in your pursuit of wealth.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Your Friends at the Securities and Exchange Commission</strong></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/11/sec-wants-to-make-funds-easier-to-understand/">SEC wants to make mutual funds easier to understand</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 11 May 2007 17:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.thestreet.com/funds/mutualfundinvesting/10356189.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/11/sec-wants-to-make-funds-easier-to-understand/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/894544/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/11/sec-wants-to-make-funds-easier-to-understand/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>actively managed funds</category><category>Chris Cox</category><category>ChrisCox</category><category>comparing mutual funds</category><category>disclosures</category><category>Edgar database</category><category>expense ratio</category><category>index funds</category><category>legalese</category><category>mutual fund management</category><category>mutual fund managers</category><category>Mutual Funds</category><category>MutualFunds</category><category>passively managed funds</category><category>past performance</category><category>SEC</category><category>war on complexity</category><category>WarOnComplexity</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 17:30:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
