<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Under the radar: Higher U.S. vehicle mpg standards -- better late than never]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/26/under-the-radar-higher-u-s-vehicle-mpg-standards-better-late/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/26/under-the-radar-higher-u-s-vehicle-mpg-standards-better-late/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/26/under-the-radar-higher-u-s-vehicle-mpg-standards-better-late/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a></p><p><strong>Under the radar:</strong> Some trends are obvious enough and visible to all investors. Others are more subtle, but are just as potent, and these often slip "under the radar."</p>
<p><strong>Case in point:</strong> the Obama administration's <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog_post/Fromperiltoprogress/">new, higher, fuel-efficiency requirement for vehicles</a>. Basically, by 2016 it will cut auto emissions by one-third while increasing the average fuel economy requirement to 39 miles per gallon for cars and 30 miles per gallon for light trucks.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/26/under-the-radar-higher-u-s-vehicle-mpg-standards-better-late/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Under the radar: Higher U.S. vehicle mpg standards -- better late than never</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/26/under-the-radar-higher-u-s-vehicle-mpg-standards-better-late/">Under the radar: Higher U.S. vehicle mpg standards -- better late than never</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 26 May 2009 18:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/26/under-the-radar-higher-u-s-vehicle-mpg-standards-better-late/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19048428/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/26/under-the-radar-higher-u-s-vehicle-mpg-standards-better-late/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cars</category><category>corporate average fuel economy</category><category>light trucks</category><category>miles per gallon</category><category>mpg</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 18:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[To gain traction in pickup market, GM goes hybrid]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/03/to-gain-traction-in-pickup-market-gm-goes-hybrid/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/03/to-gain-traction-in-pickup-market-gm-goes-hybrid/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/03/to-gain-traction-in-pickup-market-gm-goes-hybrid/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a></p><p>Pickups and SUVs are among the most profitable vehicles that Detroit sells. They are built on truck platforms and carry relatively high margins.</p>
<p>The problem with pickup sales recently is that high gas prices hurt sales of cars and trucks that use a lot of gas. Sales of most light trucks fell over 15% last year, and the Big Three have not found a solution.</p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">General Motors</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys">GM</a>) thinks it may have found a way around the fuel issue -- hybrid pickups. It will offer a new Sierra, one of its larger light trucks, powered by the new technology. "GM says the 2009 GMC Sierra hybrid gets a 25 percent improvement in fuel economy <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/gm-unveils-hybrid-pickups/n20080203003409990001">without compromising performance</a>," according to the Associated Press.</p>
<p>If the new truck sells well, GM may be able to step ahead of its rivals with a solution to get consumers back into the SUV market. For its profitability that would be a big deal.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/03/to-gain-traction-in-pickup-market-gm-goes-hybrid/">To gain traction in pickup market, GM goes hybrid</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 03 Feb 2008 10:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/03/to-gain-traction-in-pickup-market-gm-goes-hybrid/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1105133/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/03/to-gain-traction-in-pickup-market-gm-goes-hybrid/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>General Motors</category><category>GM</category><category>hybrid pickups</category><category>hybrid SUVs</category><category>Hybrids</category><category>inthenews</category><category>light trucks</category><category>pickups</category><category>Sierra</category><category>Sierra hybrid</category><category>SUVs</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 10:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[GM's re-focus continues: sells mid-size truck unit]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/20/gm-s-re-focus-continues-sells-mid-size-truck-unit/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/20/gm-s-re-focus-continues-sells-mid-size-truck-unit/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/20/gm-s-re-focus-continues-sells-mid-size-truck-unit/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a></p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">General Motors</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-motors-corporation/gm/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">GM</a>) <a href="http://media.gm.com/servlet/GatewayServlet?target=http://image.emerald.gm.com/gmnews/viewmonthlyreleasedetail.do?domain=589&amp;docid=42159">said</a> Thursday it will sell its mid-size truck unit, which <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;sid=aVKQRydmMpXo&amp;refer=news">built about 40,800 vehicles</a> in 2006, to Navistar International. Financial terms were not disclosed.<br /><br />GM's shares fell 20 cents to $26.46 in Thursday midday trading. <br /><br /><a href="http://media.gm.com/servlet/GatewayServlet?target=http://image.emerald.gm.com/gmnews/viewmonthlyreleasedetail.do?domain=589&amp;docid=42159">GM said</a> the agreement constitutes another step in the company's plan to focus on designing, manufacturing and selling cars and light trucks around the world. GM added that the deal would leverage Navistar's strengths in commercial trucks and engines, enhance its economies of scale and lower costs.<br /> <strong><br />Good decision</strong><br /> <br /> Analyst C. Leonard Bauer, formerly of Prudential, said he likes the sound of the Navistar deal. <br /> <br /> "This will enable GM to allocate more resources on its core: cars and light trucks," Bauer said. "I like the sale to Navistar in that it gets GM out of a space that did not represent a big gainer. GM has seen the future, and for them it's not in manufacturing mid-size trucks."<strong><br /></strong><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/20/gm-s-re-focus-continues-sells-mid-size-truck-unit/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>GM's re-focus continues: sells mid-size truck unit</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/20/gm-s-re-focus-continues-sells-mid-size-truck-unit/">GM's re-focus continues: sells mid-size truck unit</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 20 Dec 2007 13:19:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;sid=aVKQRydmMpXo&amp;refer=news>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/20/gm-s-re-focus-continues-sells-mid-size-truck-unit/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1067768/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/20/gm-s-re-focus-continues-sells-mid-size-truck-unit/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>auto sector</category><category>auto stocks</category><category>cars</category><category>diesel prices</category><category>gasoline prices</category><category>General Motors</category><category>GM</category><category>inthenews</category><category>light trucks</category><category>LightTrucks</category><category>medium trucks</category><category>mid-size trucks</category><category>mpg</category><category>Navistar</category><category>SUVs</category><category>trucks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 13:19:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bush, Congress still seen backing revised energy bill]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/04/bush-congress-still-seen-backing-revised-energy-bill/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/04/bush-congress-still-seen-backing-revised-energy-bill/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/04/bush-congress-still-seen-backing-revised-energy-bill/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tm/" rel="tag">Toyota Motor Corp. (TM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p>The odds of a 2007 Energy Bill passing the Democratic Party-led U.S. Congress, with President Bush's blessing, "Are still likely," according to a Washington-based, public policy lobbyist with knowledge of the matter.<br /><br />"The bill will need a few revisions, but I'd say it's a 70/30 go, in favor of the bill being signed by the president," the lobbyist told Bloggingstocks Tuesday, on condition he not be identified by name.<br /><br />The lobbyist, who represents primarily Democratic Party-based constituencies, said the the bill's renewable energy component and potential tax increases remain the hangups in the bill.<br /><br /> <strong>Modification likely</strong><br /><br />"More than likely President Bush will get the renewable energy component modified, but the Democrats may gain extra footing with better solar/wind energy credits," he said.<br /><br />The bill current would require utilities to generate more power from renewable energy. Lawmakers from the Southeast U.S. have said they're concerned that utilities in their states will not be able to meet the requirement, <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119674224083012902.html?mod=googlenews_wsj">due to a lack of wind power,</a><em> The Wall Street Journal</em> reported.<br />
<p class="MsoNormal"><!--[endif]--><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--> <!--[endif]--><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--> <!--[endif]--><o:p></o:p></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/04/bush-congress-still-seen-backing-revised-energy-bill/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bush, Congress still seen backing revised energy bill</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/04/bush-congress-still-seen-backing-revised-energy-bill/">Bush, Congress still seen backing revised energy bill</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 04 Dec 2007 17:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/04/bush-congress-still-seen-backing-revised-energy-bill/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1054686/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/04/bush-congress-still-seen-backing-revised-energy-bill/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2008 presidential election</category><category>biofuels</category><category>Bush</category><category>CAFE</category><category>cars</category><category>Chrysler</category><category>Congress</category><category>Democrats</category><category>electricity</category><category>energy bill</category><category>environment</category><category>F</category><category>Ford</category><category>gas tax</category><category>General Motors</category><category>GM</category><category>inthenews</category><category>light trucks</category><category>mpg</category><category>natural gas</category><category>President Bush</category><category>presidential election</category><category>renewable energy</category><category>Republicans</category><category>solar energy</category><category>SUVs</category><category>U.S. Congress</category><category>utilities</category><category>voters</category><category>wind power</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 17:01:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Democratic-led Congress seen hiking mpg standards]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/20/democratic-led-congress-seen-hiking-mpg-standards/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/20/democratic-led-congress-seen-hiking-mpg-standards/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/20/democratic-led-congress-seen-hiking-mpg-standards/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p>With the U.S. Federal Appeals Court of San Francisco's ruling that threw out proposed fuel economy standards, look for a renewed effort by the current U.S. Congress to pass new, tougher standards, possibly by year's end, a source familiar with various lobbying groups told Bloggingstocks. <br /><br />Based in Washington and familiar with Democratic Party and energy-issue constituencies, the source told Bloggingstocks that some legislation, albeit minor, was now likely. <br /><br />"Don't expect miracles, but the public sentiment and Congressional support appears to be there for a modest increase in <a href="http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/Corporate+Average+Fuel+Economy">CAFE</a> [<a href="http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/Corporate+Average+Fuel+Economy">Corporate Average Fuel Economy</a>] standard," he said, speaking on condition that he not be identified by name. He added that to-date the Bush Administration has resisted raising the CAFE; if the administration does so again, it's unclear whether Congress would have the votes to override the veto.<br /><br /><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/20/democratic-led-congress-seen-hiking-mpg-standards/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Democratic-led Congress seen hiking mpg standards</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/20/democratic-led-congress-seen-hiking-mpg-standards/">Democratic-led Congress seen hiking mpg standards</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 20 Nov 2007 16:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/20/democratic-led-congress-seen-hiking-mpg-standards/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1044055/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/20/democratic-led-congress-seen-hiking-mpg-standards/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>autos</category><category>CAFE</category><category>cars</category><category>Chrylser</category><category>corporate average fuel economy</category><category>diesel</category><category>diesel prices</category><category>F</category><category>Ford</category><category>fuel economy</category><category>gasoline prices</category><category>General Motors</category><category>GM</category><category>light trucks</category><category>MPG</category><category>sport utility vehicles</category><category>SUVs</category><category>vehicles</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 16:50:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
