<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Apple hit hard on AT&amp;T's iPhone numbers. Was it unwarranted?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/25/apple-hit-hard-on-atandts-iphone-numbers-was-it-unwarranted/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/25/apple-hit-hard-on-atandts-iphone-numbers-was-it-unwarranted/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/25/apple-hit-hard-on-atandts-iphone-numbers-was-it-unwarranted/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/launches/" rel="tag">Launches</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/t/" rel="tag">AT and T (T)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/iphone/" rel="tag">iPhone</a></p><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/07/aol-fly-logo.gif" alt="" /></a>Shares of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Apple Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">AAPL</a>) sank in late-day trading Tuesday after <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/atand-38-t-inc/t/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">AT&amp;T</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/atand-38-t-inc/t/nys?tabs=quotesandnews"> T</a>) said the early surge of iPhone buying wasn't as big as projected. AT&amp;T reported that 146,000 iPhone owners activated its service in the first 36 hours of the phone's debut. While that would be a huge success for any other consumer-electronic product, it was considered a flop by some. Besides, the much-touted iPhone isn't "any other consumer-electronic product." A number of analysts expected AT&amp;T to report activating as many as 500,000-700,000 iPhones for the quarter. "It was a disappointment," a Piper Jaffray analyst <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/technology/2007-07-24-apple-iphone_N.htm">told <em>USA Today.</em></a><em> </em><br /><br />The news sent shares of Apple down nearly $9, to $134 yesterday, while AT&amp;T dropped $0.35 to $39.68. Both companies are up notably today.<br /><br />Richard Linder, AT&amp;T's Chief Financial Officer told the <em>New York Times</em> that <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/25/technology/25phone.html?_r=1&amp;ref=business&amp;oref=slogin">demand for the iPhone </a>at AT&amp;T stores had outstripped supply in two days and that the launch "couldn't have gone better." Richard Doherty, an analyst at Envisoneering Group, considered the iPhone sales a success. He told <em><a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/technology/2007-07-24-apple-iphone_N.htm?csp=34">USA Today</a></em> that "no consumer electronic product at that price point has ever sold 146,000 units in two days."<br /><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/25/apple-hit-hard-on-atandts-iphone-numbers-was-it-unwarranted/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Apple hit hard on AT&amp;T's iPhone numbers. Was it unwarranted?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/25/apple-hit-hard-on-atandts-iphone-numbers-was-it-unwarranted/">Apple hit hard on AT&amp;T's iPhone numbers. Was it unwarranted?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 25 Jul 2007 16:05:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/25/apple-hit-hard-on-atandts-iphone-numbers-was-it-unwarranted/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/949122/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/25/apple-hit-hard-on-atandts-iphone-numbers-was-it-unwarranted/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aapl</category><category>activate</category><category>Apple</category><category>at and t</category><category>AtAndT</category><category>iphone</category><category>linder</category><category>phone</category><category>t</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Shult]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 16:05:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
