<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Pigs and panties: Russian banks stuck with unexpected collateral]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/27/pigs-and-panties-russian-banks-stuck-with-unexpected-collateral/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/27/pigs-and-panties-russian-banks-stuck-with-unexpected-collateral/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/27/pigs-and-panties-russian-banks-stuck-with-unexpected-collateral/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/russia/" rel="tag">Russia</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/10/blackpig004.jpg" alt="" />What happens when a bank has to accept the collateral posted for loans? Well, in Russia, it's like the punchline to a bad Yakov Smirnoff joke. "In Russia, when a bank takes collateral, it has to set up a pigpen!" </p>
<p>Well, this is exactly what happened to Alexander Lebedev's OAO National Reserve Bank. It <a target="_blank" href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&amp;sid=aTYX6OihzZhw">wound up with 40,450 of them</a>. As Russian banks are coping with the financial crisis, they are finding themselves with a variety of hard goods that they never expected to receive. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/27/pigs-and-panties-russian-banks-stuck-with-unexpected-collateral/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Pigs and panties: Russian banks stuck with unexpected collateral</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/27/pigs-and-panties-russian-banks-stuck-with-unexpected-collateral/">Pigs and panties: Russian banks stuck with unexpected collateral</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/27/pigs-and-panties-russian-banks-stuck-with-unexpected-collateral/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19210445/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/27/pigs-and-panties-russian-banks-stuck-with-unexpected-collateral/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>collateral</category><category>credit crisis</category><category>credit crunch</category><category>inthenews</category><category>lingerie</category><category>moodys</category><category>pigs</category><category>s and p</category><category>standard and poors</category><category>standard poors</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Limited Brands cuts staff to focus on lingerie and beauty]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/22/limited-brands-cuts-staff-to-focus-on-lingerie-and-beauty/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/22/limited-brands-cuts-staff-to-focus-on-lingerie-and-beauty/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/22/limited-brands-cuts-staff-to-focus-on-lingerie-and-beauty/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/from-the-boards/" rel="tag">From the Boards</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ltd/" rel="tag">Limited Brands (LTD)</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/06/vs062207.png" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />In an effort to create a more streamlined business model, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/limited-brands-inc/ltd/nys">Limited Brands Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/limited-brands-inc/ltd/nys">LTD</a>) announced today that it will cut <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/limited-brands-cuts-corporate-staff/20070622105609990001?cid=403">roughly 10% of its corporate staff</a>. This move comes as the company is reducing its exposure in apparel sales to focus on two areas where it sees the brightest future: lingerie and beauty products.<br /><br />In addition to operating Express and Limited Stores, Limited Brands also operates Victoria's Secret and Bath &amp; Body Works, and that is where they see the company moving in the future. According to Les Wexner, the company's chairman and chief executive, the company is looking to "streamline the company, enhance productivity and efficiency, and focus resources on the most promising growth opportunities".<br /><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/22/limited-brands-cuts-staff-to-focus-on-lingerie-and-beauty/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Limited Brands cuts staff to focus on lingerie and beauty</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/22/limited-brands-cuts-staff-to-focus-on-lingerie-and-beauty/">Limited Brands cuts staff to focus on lingerie and beauty</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 22 Jun 2007 19:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/limited-brands-cuts-corporate-staff/20070622105609990001?cid=403>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/22/limited-brands-cuts-staff-to-focus-on-lingerie-and-beauty/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/924588/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/22/limited-brands-cuts-staff-to-focus-on-lingerie-and-beauty/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Express</category><category>Limited Brand</category><category>Limited Stores</category><category>LimitedBrand</category><category>LimitedStores</category><category>lingerie</category><category>LTD</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 19:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Express Stores, Limited not as sexy as Victoria's Secret ... and soap]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/15/express-stores-limited-not-as-sexy-as-victorias-secret-and/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/15/express-stores-limited-not-as-sexy-as-victorias-secret-and/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/15/express-stores-limited-not-as-sexy-as-victorias-secret-and/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/privateequity/" rel="tag">Private Equity</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ltd/" rel="tag">Limited Brands (LTD)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/05/victorias_secret_sexy.jpg" alt="victoria's secret is just way more sexy" />Mega-trendy retailer <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/limited-brands-inc/ltd/nys">Limited Brands</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/limited-brands-inc/ltd/nys">LTD</a>) announced the <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/limited-brands-to-sell-express/20070515152909990001?cid=403">sale today of its Express Stores unit</a> to <a href="http://www.bloggingbuyouts.com">private equity</a> firm <a href="http://www.bloggingbuyouts.com/golden-gate-capital/">Golden Gate Capital</a>, and in the same breath said it was evaluating the options for its Limited Stores segment -- the brand the company derives its name from. Despite the surface inscrutability of this decision (why sell the company's titular brands, the ones that are growing in gross profit while the company's other units are slipping bigtime?), it's one that analysts have been predicting for a while given that CEO Leslie Wexner has been hyping his Victoria's Secret unit as a "megabrand" upon which Limited's future prospects would hinge. Both Victoria's Secret and soap-and-lotion retailer Bath &amp; Body Works, he insists, depend on products whose sales are more predictable than those of clothing.<br /><br />While that's certainly true, it's also true that the profit margins for the cheap, trendy clothing sold by the company's Express and Limited stores are growing while the rest of the company's brands are falling. Today the company announced that it is <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/limited-slashes-1q-year-view/n20070515163509990004">revising its outlook for Q1 2007 downward significantly</a> due to poorer-than-expected sales and merchandise margins at Victoria's Secret. After slashing the outlook from 25-28 cents a share to 12-14 cents a share, the stock was down significantly, $1.23 or 4.5% to $26.18, although after-market trading shows some nice recovery.<br /><br />Perhaps the prediction isn't so easy, but the fact remains that the profit margins and same-store sales growth is a lot better on lemongrass- and magnolia-scented lotion than tank tops and skinny jeans. While Victoria's Secret and Bath &amp; Body Works regularly record operating profit in the 20-30% range, a good quarter for Express and Limited stores hovers between 5% and 6%. Lingerie is sexy, and soap is way, way sexier -- and Limited Brands has picked this clean, sweet-smelling horse to ride for now.<br /><br />As of February 3, 2007, Limited had 658 Express stores and 260 Limited stores; 1,326 stores in the Victoria's Secret unit (which includes the La Senza brand); and 1,546 Bath &amp; Body Works stores.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/15/express-stores-limited-not-as-sexy-as-victorias-secret-and/">Express Stores, Limited not as sexy as Victoria's Secret ... and soap</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 15 May 2007 17:08:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/15/express-stores-limited-not-as-sexy-as-victorias-secret-and/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/896877/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/15/express-stores-limited-not-as-sexy-as-victorias-secret-and/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bath and body works</category><category>bath body works</category><category>BathAndBodyWorks</category><category>BathBodyWorks</category><category>express</category><category>express stores</category><category>ExpressStores</category><category>golden gate</category><category>golden gate capital</category><category>GoldenGate</category><category>GoldenGateCapital</category><category>limited</category><category>limited brands</category><category>limited express</category><category>limited stores</category><category>LimitedBrands</category><category>LimitedExpress</category><category>LimitedStores</category><category>lingerie</category><category>ltd</category><category>private equity</category><category>PrivateEquity</category><category>secret</category><category>sex</category><category>sexy</category><category>victoria</category><category>victoria's secret</category><category>Victoria'sSecret</category><category>vs</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 17:08:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Can coffee get any hotter? Seattle spins "sexpresso"]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/22/can-coffee-get-any-hotter-seattle-spins-sexpresso/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/22/can-coffee-get-any-hotter-seattle-spins-sexpresso/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/22/can-coffee-get-any-hotter-seattle-spins-sexpresso/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sbux/" rel="tag">Starbucks (SBUX)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/01/lacey_bra_240.jpg" />In an area where good coffee is ubiquitous, how does one business stand apart from another? A diverse selection of low-fat bran muffins? Not for me. Free Norah Jones CD samplers? Nope. Sheer, baby-doll negligees with thigh-high boots? Sold.<br /><br />According to <em>The Seattle Times</em>, along the cluttered roadsides of Seattle's commuter towns, drive-through espresso bars are going to creative lengths to attract business, well, male business at least. These caffeinated joints feature <a href="http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2003535398_coffeegirls22e.html">"bodacious" baristas</a> offering not just double macchiatos with almond biscotti, but "flirty service and revealing outfits" (including lingerie and "fetish" ensembles) at establishments with names such as Moka Girls, Bikini Espresso and Natt&eacute; Latt&eacute;. <br /><br />While drive-throughs have long been part of Starbucks Corp (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/starbucks-corporation/sbux/nas">SBUX</a>)'s business, many independent espresso stands popped up after the state's smoking ban went into effect a year ago. Says Lori Bowden, owner of Tukwila, Washington's Cowgirls Espresso stand, owners of bars, casinos and convenience-stores at that time began renting parking lot spots to espresso stands. And while the debate rages over who started the whole Red Light District element, no one argues that the Git-R-Done nation -- who might never have entered a Starbucks -- are now frequenting their establishments many times a day.<br /><br />Offended local businesses have set up surveillance but no laws have been broken, as private parts -- including buttocks -- are always covered. Says Bowden, in spite of customer requests "there will be no 'Thong Thursdays.'"<br /><br /><em>B. Brandon Barker is the author of <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Operation-EMU-B-Brandon-Barker/dp/0977376338/?tag2=wwwwiselephac-20">Operation EMU</a></em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/22/can-coffee-get-any-hotter-seattle-spins-sexpresso/">Can coffee get any hotter? Seattle spins "sexpresso"</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 22 Jan 2007 20:07:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/22/can-coffee-get-any-hotter-seattle-spins-sexpresso/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/740523/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/22/can-coffee-get-any-hotter-seattle-spins-sexpresso/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>barista</category><category>bodacious baristas</category><category>BodaciousBaristas</category><category>coffee</category><category>drive through</category><category>drive thru</category><category>drive-through</category><category>DriveThrough</category><category>DriveThru</category><category>espresso</category><category>espresso stands</category><category>EspressoStands</category><category>lingerie</category><category>negligee</category><category>sbux</category><category>sex</category><category>sexy</category><category>sexy coffee</category><category>SexyCoffee</category><category>starbucks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brandon Barker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 20:07:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Julie Roehm too 'sexy' for Wal-Mart; proves Bentonville still honors Sam's values]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/08/julie-roehm-too-sexy-for-wal-mart-proves-bentonville-still-ho/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/08/julie-roehm-too-sexy-for-wal-mart-proves-bentonville-still-ho/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/08/julie-roehm-too-sexy-for-wal-mart-proves-bentonville-still-ho/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="julie roehm"  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/12/julie_roehm_elsa_getty_20061208_240.jpg" />Julie Roehm contradicted everything that Sam Walton ever held dear, and her hiring a year ago had many Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (NYSE:WMT) observers scratching their heads. Famous for her racy, attention-getting antics -- like her "<a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/advertising/2003-12-09-lingerie_x.htm">Lingerie Bowl</a>" in which models clad in underthings played 'football' -- Roehm never seemed the right sort for Wal-Mart. She was fast cars, sex and rock-and-roll to Wal-Mart's Buicks, family values and Barry Manilow. In fact, her transformation of the shareholder meeting from boring to off-Broadway was a spectacle to behold (and, it seems, had old-line Wal-Mart executives "groaning," <a href="http://articles.news.aol.com/business/_a/wal-mart-fires-marketing-star-and-ad/20061208091409990010">according to the <em>New York Times</em></a>.<br /><br /><strong>[Recent Julie Roehm news:</strong><br /><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/27/wal-mart-should-bring-julie-roehm-back/">Wal-Mart should bring Julie Roehm back</a> -- May 27, 2007<br /><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/25/julie-roehm-strikes-back-claims-lee-scott-violated-ethics/">Julie Roehm claims Lee Scott violated ethics</a> -- May 25, 2007<br /><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/29/julie-roehm-says-wal-mart-charges-invalid-one-for-the-obvious/">Julie Roehm says Wal-Mart charges invalid</a> -- March 29, 2007<br /><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/20/wal-marts-breakup-with-former-executives-turn-ugly/">Wal-Mart countersues Julie Roehm</a> -- March 20, 2007<strong>]</strong><br /><br />Now she's <a href="http://wmt.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/06/wal-marts-advertising-chief-leaves-company/">been ousted</a>, amid allegations of an inappropriate relationship with a subordinate, and the advertising agency she chose -- DraftFCB of Chicago -- is <a href="http://wmt.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/08/wal-mart-dismisses-ad-firm-that-it-just-hired-recently/">unceremoniously dismissed</a> before it even began work on the huge account.<br /><br />How was this ever supposed to work? I have to ask. Wal-Mart executives, even Sam himself, were always told to sleep two to a room while travelling on business, and select the cheapest available lodging. The company has strict "fraternization" rules so that any relationship between colleagues is inappropriate. [While it's not said outright in anything I've read, it seems that Julie Roehm has been <em>read-between-the-lines </em>accused of sleeping with Sean Womack, a member of the marketing staff at a lower rank than Roehm. It doesn't shock <em>me</em>. People who work together sleep together, it's happened everywhere <em>I've</em> ever collected a paycheck.]<br /><br />Wal-Mart is <em>so </em><strong>not </strong>Julie Roehm.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/08/julie-roehm-too-sexy-for-wal-mart-proves-bentonville-still-ho/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Julie Roehm too 'sexy' for Wal-Mart; proves Bentonville still honors Sam's values</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/08/julie-roehm-too-sexy-for-wal-mart-proves-bentonville-still-ho/">Julie Roehm too 'sexy' for Wal-Mart; proves Bentonville still honors Sam's values</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 08 Dec 2006 16:43:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/08/julie-roehm-too-sexy-for-wal-mart-proves-bentonville-still-ho/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/715441/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/08/julie-roehm-too-sexy-for-wal-mart-proves-bentonville-still-ho/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aston-martin</category><category>chicago</category><category>draft</category><category>draft fcb</category><category>DraftFcb</category><category>howard draft</category><category>HowardDraft</category><category>julie roehm</category><category>JulieRoehm</category><category>lingerie</category><category>racy</category><category>roehm</category><category>sex</category><category>sexy</category><category>wal-mart</category><category>wmt</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 16:43:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
