litigation posts
FeedPosted Dec 30th 2009 12:40PM by Mark Fightmaster (RSS feed)
Filed under: Broadcom Corp'A' (BRCM)
Tech firm Broadcom (BRCM) announced that it has agreed in principle to settle a pending class action litigation against the company and some of its current and former officers. The litigation surrounded the company's historical stock-option accounting practices, and was settled for $160.5 million in cash.
The legal action was on behalf of persons and entities that bought or acquired shares of BRCM between July 21, 2005 and July 13, 2006. The $160.5 million cash payment will result in the release and dismissal (with prejudice) of the claims against both the company and its officers and directors. In December 2006, BRCM was singled out as a company participating in backdating of stock options, an illegal practice.
Continue reading Broadcom Settles Stock-Option Dispute
Posted Nov 13th 2009 6:20PM by Tom Johansmeyer (RSS feed)
Filed under: Scandals
Normal tech support phone call: "Press 1 for help with e-mail. Press 2 to have your password reset."
Madoff tech support phone call: "Hello, how can I help you dummy up some trading records today?"
The investigation of Bernie Madoff's fraudulent financial empire is leading to more arrests. Jerome O'Hara and George Perez, both computer programmers employed by the Ponzi schemer, were arrested by the FBI on Friday morning. The charges include conspiracy for falsifying books and records. They are accused of doing the deed for the boss and accepting hush money -- in the form of 25% raises and net bonuses of $60,000 -- to keep the scam afloat.
Continue reading Two more arrests in Madoff saga
Posted Oct 21st 2009 4:40PM by Tom Johansmeyer (RSS feed)
Filed under: Law, Scandals
All it takes is a little patience. F. Scott Yeager, a former Enron executive, got some good news from the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans, which ruled that it wouldn't revisit his case. So, he no longer has criminal charges related to financial fraud hanging over him. Yeager has been acquitted on all counts. This follows a June ruling by the Supreme Court, which tossed a previous 5th Circuit Court ruling that could have resulted in a new trial.
The ruling said, "Today, ... it is clear under our initial ... analysis the jury made a finding in acquitting Yeager that precludes prosecution on insider trading and money laundering." Samuel Buffone, who was one of Yeager's attorneys, stated that his client shouldn't have been indicted to begin with and didn't do anything wrong. It has taken them seven years to get to this point.
Yeager landed in hot water because he sold stock in Enron for more than $54 million before it began the plunge that would ultimately end with its bankruptcy in 2001. He faced 125 counts, was acquitted of five (four for wire fraud and one for conspiracy to commit wire and securities fraud) and wound up with a hung jury for the remaining 120, which included insider trading and money laundering. He was later indicted again on 13 counts of insider trading and money laundering.
Continue reading Former Enron exec set free
Posted Sep 28th 2009 10:00AM by Tom Johansmeyer (RSS feed)
Filed under: Scandals
Even with the ringleader in jail, the pursuit of Bernie Madoff doesn't seem to be finished. Sunday night, the trustee who's winding down the Madoff company said on 60 Minutes that Madoff's two sons (Mark and Andrew), brother (Peter) and niece (Shana) will be slapped with a $198 million suit. They are alleged to have known about the Ponzi scheme, according to the trustee, Irving Picard and his chief counsel, David Sheehan.
Sheehan and Picard are also working under the assumption that there is still some money hidden, quite a lot of it, in fact. Picard told the show, "We'd assume it's millions and millions of dollars." Yet, this probably wouldn't help with the task in front of them.
Continue reading Madoff family to be sued for $198 million
Posted Sep 20th 2009 3:10PM by Tom Johansmeyer (RSS feed)
Filed under: Law, Abercrombie and Fitch (ANF)
Abercrombie & Fitch (NYSE: ANF) is being sued by a Muslim teenager who wanted to work at an Abercrombie Kids store in Oklahoma's Woodland Hills Mall. When she applied in June 2008, Samantha Elauf was told that the hijab she wears is inconsistent with Abercrombie's "Look Policy." So, the 17-year-old took her concerns to U.S. District Court on Wednesday, where a lawsuit was filed by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
A spokeswoman for the retailer wouldn't comment on the lawsuit but did indicate that the store has a strong policy around equal employment opportunity and that it accommodates religious practices "when possible."
Continue reading Muslim teen sues Abercrombie over its 'Look Policy'
Posted Aug 31st 2009 2:20PM by Tom Johansmeyer (RSS feed)
Filed under: Employees, Economic Data, Recession
Across the country, college classes are starting. In each of these classrooms, students are struggling with calculus, trudging through Candide, and wondering just what the hell they're going to do with their degrees upon graduation. The last of these is characteristic of every college student, especially those of us, with the foresight fortitude recklessness zeal to major in liberal arts fields (in my case, Philosophy).
The anxiety is a bit higher this year, given a high rate of unemployment, the likelihood of a "jobless recovery" and the fact that it could take years for destroyed value to be recovered.
Continue reading 2.9 million college kids unsure of career plans
Posted Feb 4th 2009 2:30PM by Mark Fightmaster (RSS feed)
Filed under: Citigroup Inc. (C)

Seriously, doesn't
Citigroup (NYSE:
C) have bigger fish to fry? Yesterday, the company released plans for using $36.5 billion of the $45 billion it received from the government - a majority of which will go to residential mortgage lending. This is a good thing, especially in light of questions surfacing about the company's $400 million sponsorship of the New York Mets' new digs (will they or won't they sponsor the stadium ... sure looks like they will).
Continue reading Citigroup suing a pawnshop ... seriously
Posted Dec 15th 2008 11:50AM by Tom Taulli (RSS feed)
Filed under: Law, Private Equity
It's been the key question for Huntsman Corporation (NYSE: HUN): Deal or no deal?
Now we know. This week, the company reached an agreement with its private equity sponsor, Apollo Management, to end its $6.5 billion buyout transaction.
For the past six months, the parties have been embroiled in heated litigation with Huntsman getting the edge as the Delaware court ruled that Apollo had to use best efforts to close the deal . As a result, Apollo's settlement is not cheap. The fees come to about $1 billion.
Although, it's a good deal for both parties. Apollo could have lost even more money if the merger agreement had been enforced. As seen with the collapse of the BCE (NYSE: BCE) deal, there is no appetite for multi-billion-dollar deals. And since Huntsman is in a highly cyclical business – specialty chemicals -- it would have likely made it difficult to justify a buyout.
The dispute is far from over, though. Huntsman is still pursuing a lawsuit with its bankers -- Credit Suisse and Deutsche Bank -- on the deal. In other words, Huntsman may even snag even more money from the broken deal.
Still, Wall Street isn't too thrilled. In today's session, Huntsman's shares are down 44% to $3.27 by midday trading.
Tom Taulli is the author of various books, including The Complete M&A Handbook
and The Streetsmart Guide to Short Selling: Techniques the Pros Use to Profit in Any Market
. He is also the founder of BizEquity, a valuation website.
Posted Oct 6th 2008 8:58AM by Zac Bissonnette (RSS feed)
Filed under: Law, Bank of America (BAC)

Given the continued deterioration in the financial markets and mortgage industry, it seems likely that
Bank of America (NYSE:
BAC) badly overpaid for Countrywide Financial -- if the company's equity was worth anything at all.
This latest bit of news won't help. Attorneys general offices in California and Illinois have
negotiated a settlement with the lender that will require Countrywide to modify terms on tens of thousands of loans. The settlement will offer strapped California borrowers $3.5 billion in relief, and if all 50 states sign on the total price could soar as high as $8.7 billion, according to the Illinois Attorney General's office. So far, Arizona, Connecticut, Florida, Iowa, Michigan, North Carolina, Ohio, Texas and Washington have joined Illinois and California in the deal.
In a statement, California Attorney General Jerry Brown Jr. said that "Countrywide's lending practices turned the American dream into a nightmare for tens of thousands of families by putting them into loans they couldn't understand and ultimately couldn't afford."
Of course, Bank of America knew going into the deal that it would have billions in litigation expenses to deal with but the downward spiraling of the economy has given CEO Ken Lewis a lot less margin for error. There are still shareholder class-action lawsuits and piles of consumer litigation to be sorted through, and, at a minimum, he has to be wishing he'd saved his ammunition to acquire cheaper assets in the midst of the carnage.
Long-term, it seems doubtful to me that the Countrywide Financial brand has any value at all. Why would anyone go to the poster child for the biggest real estate meltdown in history for a loan?
Posted May 28th 2008 6:00PM by Gary Sattler (RSS feed)
Filed under: Competitive Strategy, Marketing and Advertising, Limited Brands (LTD), Small Business

If the current rash of courtroom events surrounding Victoria's Secret is what CEO Sharen Turney had in mind when she indicated that
the company might have become "too sexy", I think there may be trouble in store for that flagship name of
Limited Brands Inc. (NYSE:
LTD). I don't know about you, but I find courtroom litigation anything but sexy. Unless of course, we're talking about the assistant district attorneys they cast for Law and Order.
First, Victoria's Secret pulled an 'Atomic Wedgie" on Kentucky couple, Victor and Cathy Moseley, by gaining a court order to block the couple from using a truncated version of The Victoria's Secret name. It's no big deal really because it was fairly obvious that the names "Victor's Secret" and "Victor's Little Secret" were pretty flagrant abuses of a trademarked name which deserves secure protection. The one little triumph which came out of that decade-long legal tussle was that the court determined that plaintiffs in trademark infringement cases do not need to show that the infringement actually cost them money, as revealed in a decidedly not sexy
Associated Press news blurb.Next, we find out that Juicy Couture has grabbed Victoria's Secret by the seat of the pants, regarding
alleged product marketing infringement. It seems that Juicy thinks that Vicky has infringed on various aspects of packaging, color schemes and logo placement, as explained by blogger
Bruce Watson. Personally, I haven't analyzed the claimed offenses. I'll leave that to the courts. I do however find the whole thing to be a bit blown out of proportion -- and very un-sexy.
Continue reading Victoria's Secret trips over 'sexy'
Posted May 9th 2008 9:52AM by Eliza Popescu (RSS feed)
Filed under: Earnings Reports, Deals, Marketing and Advertising, , Economic Data

Shares of radio broadcaster
Clear Channel Communications Inc. (NYSE:
CCU) were slightly up in early trading after the company posted
higher first-quarter profit boosted in part by gains in its outdoor advertising unit. Though, the company was not able to beat analysts' predictions as the weak economy put pressure on the overall advertising market.
Clear Channel Communications announced that its quarterly profit surged to $799.7 million, or $1.61 per share. The income figures were definitely something to cheer about. During its first quarter last year, the company had net income of $102.2 million or 21 cents per share. Excluding one-time items, earnings for the quarter would have been $0.19 per share. Analysts' forecast (which typically exclude one-time items) was for $0.21 per share, according to Thomson Reuters.
The media and advertising display company also said that quarterly revenue rose 3.9% to
$1.56 billion, compared with $1.51 billion reported in the same period a year ago, helped by favorable foreign exchange rates; excluding the effect of the week dollar, revenue rose only 1%. Analysts had been expecting to see
slower sales of $1.53 billion.
Continue reading Clear Channel (CCU) first-quarter profit soars but misses estimates
Next Page >