<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[JockStocks: Will steroids ever drive fans away from baseball?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/31/jockstocks-will-steroids-ever-drive-fans-away-from-baseball/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/31/jockstocks-will-steroids-ever-drive-fans-away-from-baseball/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/31/jockstocks-will-steroids-ever-drive-fans-away-from-baseball/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/business-of-sports/" rel="tag">Business of Sports</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/03/nystadium220.jpg" alt="" />It's like clockwork, seriously ... recently, every year around the Baseball Hall of Fame inductions there is news that A) Bud Selig is or isn't considering lifting the lifetime ban against Pete Rose and B) names from the list of players who tested positive in 2003 are leaked. </p>
<p>As for option A, Pete belongs in the Hall of Fame -- but not in baseball. I mean seriously, he has the most memorabilia in the Hall of Fame, so induction is theoretically academic. Enough of that though, I want to take a look at the steroid list and the potential economic impact on baseball.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/31/jockstocks-will-steroids-ever-drive-fans-away-from-baseball/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>JockStocks: Will steroids ever drive fans away from baseball?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/31/jockstocks-will-steroids-ever-drive-fans-away-from-baseball/">JockStocks: Will steroids ever drive fans away from baseball?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 31 Jul 2009 12:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/31/jockstocks-will-steroids-ever-drive-fans-away-from-baseball/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19115458/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/31/jockstocks-will-steroids-ever-drive-fans-away-from-baseball/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>baseball</category><category>Boston Red Sox</category><category>David Ortiz</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Jose Canseco</category><category>major league baseball</category><category>Manny Ramirez</category><category>New York Yankees</category><category>steroids</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 12:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why isn't anyone watching baseball?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/26/why-isnt-anyone-watching-baseball/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/26/why-isnt-anyone-watching-baseball/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/26/why-isnt-anyone-watching-baseball/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/business-of-sports/" rel="tag">Business of Sports</a></p><p><img  alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/05/kevindooley.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />The 2008 Major League Baseball World Series achieved the event's lowest television ratings in history, and the league is off to a similarly lousy start to the 2009 season. </p>
<p>Ratings for Fox Saturday Baseball have slipped 9% since last season and 23% since 2000. <em>The Wall Street Journal</em> <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124329732181152867.html#mod=todays_us_personal_journal">reports</a> (subscription required) that Fox executives will be meeting with MLB Commissioner Bud Selig next week to try to come up with ways to boost ratings. </p>
<p>Executives are not panicking yet -- the real test will be the All-Star Game and the Playoffs, which account for 90% of the revenue under licensing deals.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/26/why-isnt-anyone-watching-baseball/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Why isn't anyone watching baseball?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/26/why-isnt-anyone-watching-baseball/">Why isn't anyone watching baseball?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 26 May 2009 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124329732181152867.html#mod=todays_us_personal_journal>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/26/why-isnt-anyone-watching-baseball/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1562709/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/26/why-isnt-anyone-watching-baseball/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>Major League Baseball</category><category>MajorLeagueBaseball</category><category>MLB</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[JockStocks: Saving money at a baseball game]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/22/jockstocks-saving-money-at-a-baseball-game/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/22/jockstocks-saving-money-at-a-baseball-game/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/22/jockstocks-saving-money-at-a-baseball-game/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/business-of-sports/" rel="tag">Business of Sports</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/05/kevindooley.jpg" />As of last Sunday, Major League Baseball's regular-season attendance is down nearly 4.5% this year -- including both New York clubs, <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/sportsNews/idUSTRE54K5X420090521">according to Reuters</a>. </p>
<p>Why is the inclusion of the New York Yankees and Mets important? Because the two teams opened brand new palaces this year, both of which are smaller than the parks they played in a year ago. <br /><br />Before the season, baseball officials predicted that attendance could drop as much as 10% from last year's 78.6 million -- with league revenue coming in flat compared to last year's record $6.5 billion. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/22/jockstocks-saving-money-at-a-baseball-game/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>JockStocks: Saving money at a baseball game</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/22/jockstocks-saving-money-at-a-baseball-game/">JockStocks: Saving money at a baseball game</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 22 May 2009 13:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/22/jockstocks-saving-money-at-a-baseball-game/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1553829/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/22/jockstocks-saving-money-at-a-baseball-game/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>baseball bargains</category><category>bud selig</category><category>Cincinnati Reds</category><category>family budget</category><category>family fun</category><category>featured</category><category>Major League Baseball</category><category>New York Mets</category><category>New York Yankees</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 13:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Texas Rangers owner in a world of financial trouble]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/10/texas-rangers-owner-in-a-world-of-financial-trouble/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/10/texas-rangers-owner-in-a-world-of-financial-trouble/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/10/texas-rangers-owner-in-a-world-of-financial-trouble/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/business-of-sports/" rel="tag">Business of Sports</a></p><p><img hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/03/nystadium220.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />Tom Hicks, the owner of the Texas Rangers baseball team and the Dallas Stars NHL franchise, has defaulted on a $525 million loan related to the teams.</p>
<p>Hicks has downplayed the importance of the default, saying that it's just a bargaining tactic to bring the lenders back to the bargaining table to negotiate better terms. But industry experts tell The Associated Press that that's unlikely to be the full extent of it. A default on a loan is usually <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jbvPOao_ZgiGKhJrr8K1eRp3De1QD982V2V01">a sign of serious financial problems</a>, but analysts think that Hicks has enough equity in his teams to maintain control -- even if he does end up selling minority stakes to outside investors.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/10/texas-rangers-owner-in-a-world-of-financial-trouble/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Texas Rangers owner in a world of financial trouble</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/10/texas-rangers-owner-in-a-world-of-financial-trouble/">Texas Rangers owner in a world of financial trouble</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 10 May 2009 15:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/10/texas-rangers-owner-in-a-world-of-financial-trouble/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1541496/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/10/texas-rangers-owner-in-a-world-of-financial-trouble/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Buster Olney</category><category>Major League Baseball</category><category>MLB</category><category>Tom Hicks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 15:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Yankees cut ticket prices from outrageous to 'merely' absurd]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/30/yankees-cut-ticket-prices-from-outrageous-to-merely-absurd/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/30/yankees-cut-ticket-prices-from-outrageous-to-merely-absurd/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/30/yankees-cut-ticket-prices-from-outrageous-to-merely-absurd/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/business-of-sports/" rel="tag">Business of Sports</a></p>New York Yankee executives apparently read BloggingStocks. A day or so after posting on the American League baseball franchise's <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/28/yankees-overestimate-demand-for-pricey-seats/">truly-stratospheric plus-$2,000 ticket prices </a>(and empty seats) at the new Yankee Stadium, the Yankees announced a ticket price cut. <br /><br />The Yankees <a href="http://newyork.yankees.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20090428&amp;content_id=4463658&amp;vkey=news_nyy&amp;fext=.jsp&amp;c_id=nyy">cut prices on most premium seats,</a> including a 50% cut in the top Legend Suite seats, to $1,250 from $2,500. Season ticket and partial ticket plan holders who purchased tickets at the previous price will receive additional, complimentary tickets as compensation or a credit.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/30/yankees-cut-ticket-prices-from-outrageous-to-merely-absurd/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Yankees cut ticket prices from outrageous to 'merely' absurd</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/30/yankees-cut-ticket-prices-from-outrageous-to-merely-absurd/">Yankees cut ticket prices from outrageous to 'merely' absurd</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 30 Apr 2009 17:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/30/yankees-cut-ticket-prices-from-outrageous-to-merely-absurd/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1533076/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/30/yankees-cut-ticket-prices-from-outrageous-to-merely-absurd/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>baseball</category><category>Major League Baseball</category><category>MLB</category><category>New York Yankees</category><category>ticket prices</category><category>tickets</category><category>Yankee Stadium</category><category>Yankees</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 17:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Yankees overestimate demand for pricey seats]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/28/yankees-overestimate-demand-for-pricey-seats/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/28/yankees-overestimate-demand-for-pricey-seats/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/28/yankees-overestimate-demand-for-pricey-seats/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/business-of-sports/" rel="tag">Business of Sports</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/04/yankee1.jpg" alt="" />It's a sign of the times: the New York Yankees, who just opened a cathedral of baseball, the $1.5 billion <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yankee_Stadium">new Yankee Stadium,</a> have underestimated the impact of the U.S. recession on sports/entertainment/leisure spending. <br /><br />About 1,800 high-priced seats -- with prices up to <span style="font-style: italic;">$2,625 for each</span> <span style="font-style: italic;">game</span> -- have not sold. Imagine that. The Yankees began the inaugural season at their new home in the Bronx, located across the street from <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yankee_Stadium_(1923)">The House That Ruth Built</a>, by increasing ticket prices anywhere from 5 to 50% per seat.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/28/yankees-overestimate-demand-for-pricey-seats/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Yankees overestimate demand for pricey seats</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/28/yankees-overestimate-demand-for-pricey-seats/">Yankees overestimate demand for pricey seats</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 28 Apr 2009 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/28/yankees-overestimate-demand-for-pricey-seats/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1529710/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/28/yankees-overestimate-demand-for-pricey-seats/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>baseball</category><category>Major League Baseball</category><category>MLB</category><category>New Yankee Stadium</category><category>tickets</category><category>Yankee Stadium</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Part shrine, part palace -- New Yankee Stadium opens Thursday]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/01/part-shrine-part-palace-new-yankee-stadium-opens-thursday/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/01/part-shrine-part-palace-new-yankee-stadium-opens-thursday/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/01/part-shrine-part-palace-new-yankee-stadium-opens-thursday/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/business-of-sports/" rel="tag">Business of Sports</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/04/jeffpearce.jpg" alt="" />The <a href="http://www.yankees.com">New York Yankees,</a> the greatest and most storied professional, sports franchise in human history, open the <a href="http://newyork.yankees.mlb.com/nyy/ballpark/index.jsp">New Yankee Stadium</a> in two days. <br /><br />Actually, the first, regular season home game isn't until April 16, but the ballclub will open the doors to their new palace on Thursday at 1:30 p.m. for a paid-attendance, afternoon workout and two exhibition games Friday night and Saturday afternoon, before starting the regular season on the road next week. <br /><strong><br /></strong><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/01/part-shrine-part-palace-new-yankee-stadium-opens-thursday/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Part shrine, part palace -- New Yankee Stadium opens Thursday</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/01/part-shrine-part-palace-new-yankee-stadium-opens-thursday/">Part shrine, part palace -- New Yankee Stadium opens Thursday</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 01 Apr 2009 15:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/01/part-shrine-part-palace-new-yankee-stadium-opens-thursday/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1504214/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/01/part-shrine-part-palace-new-yankee-stadium-opens-thursday/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>baseball</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Major League Baseball</category><category>New Yankee Stadium</category><category>New York Yankees</category><category>ticket prices</category><category>tickets</category><category>Yankee Stadium</category><category>Yankees</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 15:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[A salary cap in baseball?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/20/a-salary-cap-in-baseball/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/20/a-salary-cap-in-baseball/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/20/a-salary-cap-in-baseball/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/baseballpic.jpg" alt="" />Let's take a trip to the "yeah right" files with this entry. Boston Red Sox owner John Henry has again picked up the torch crying for a salary cap yet again. Pot, this is the kettle. The Red Sox payroll is the fourth-highest in Major League Baseball at $133,390,035. Henry's problem is that he was outspent by his arch rival: the New York Yankees. In fact, Henry said that the Yankees spent like Congress.<br /><br />For history's sake, Henry presented a salary cap five years ago (which was sour grapes in the wake of losing A-Roid to the Yankees) -- obviously this proposal never took hold. I just find it humorous that the owner of the Red Sox is calling for a salary cap. This is a team that is spending a veritable ton of money, and is succeeding. Let's take a look at the Pittsburgh Pirates, the Cincinnati Reds, the Oakland A's. All of these teams are considered "small market" teams. One would think that one of their owners would be yelling for a cap -- and that isn't the case.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/20/a-salary-cap-in-baseball/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>A salary cap in baseball?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/20/a-salary-cap-in-baseball/">A salary cap in baseball?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 20 Feb 2009 16:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/20/a-salary-cap-in-baseball/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1464947/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/20/a-salary-cap-in-baseball/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Boston Red Sox</category><category>BostonRedSox</category><category>business of sports</category><category>BusinessOfSports</category><category>major league baseball</category><category>MajorLeagueBaseball</category><category>New York Yankees</category><category>NewYorkYankees</category><category>sports</category><category>sports business</category><category>SportsBusiness</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 16:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[MLB teams up with the NHL to sell online video package]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/09/major-league-baseball-teams-up-with-the-national-hockey-league/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/09/major-league-baseball-teams-up-with-the-national-hockey-league/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/09/major-league-baseball-teams-up-with-the-national-hockey-league/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/sidney-crosby.jpg" alt="" />No, we aren't talking about a great deal of cross promotion between my Cincinnati Reds and my Columbus Blue Jackets or anything (although the thought of my right-handed doppelganger, <a href="http://www.baseballmusings.com/archives/AaronHarang2226011_Reds_v_Giants.jpg">Aaron Harang</a> on skates should intimidate even the toughest hockey player), but Major League Baseball Advanced Media (MLBAM) and the National Hockey League (NHL) are teaming up. <br /><br />The two are going to start co-selling an online video package where out-of-market game subscriptions for both leagues will be marketed in tandem. According to <a href="http://www.sportsbusinessjournal.com/article/61479"><em>The Sports Business Journal</em></a> (SBJ), this deal "marks a rare level of cooperation between sports entities with limited common ownership."<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/09/major-league-baseball-teams-up-with-the-national-hockey-league/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>MLB teams up with the NHL to sell online video package</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/09/major-league-baseball-teams-up-with-the-national-hockey-league/">MLB teams up with the NHL to sell online video package</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 09 Feb 2009 15:39:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/09/major-league-baseball-teams-up-with-the-national-hockey-league/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1454790/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/09/major-league-baseball-teams-up-with-the-national-hockey-league/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>business</category><category>business partnership</category><category>BusinessPartnership</category><category>major league baseball</category><category>MajorLeagueBaseball</category><category>national hockey league</category><category>NationalHockeyLeague</category><category>television</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 15:39:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Citigroup-NY Mets deal is nuts]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/the-citigroup-ny-mets-deal-is-nuts/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/the-citigroup-ny-mets-deal-is-nuts/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/the-citigroup-ny-mets-deal-is-nuts/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/another_citigroup_logo.jpg" />The New York Mets, whose September collapses have delighted us Philadelphia Phillies fans, have screwed up even bigger with their $400 million stadium naming rights deal with<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys"> Citigroup Inc. </a>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C)</a>.<br /><br />Baseball's premier choke artists are now <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/money/2009/02/03/2009-02-03_report_citigroup_eyeing_bailout_from_nam.html">denying an earlier report</a> that the troubled New York-based bank was trying to back out of its commitment to the team. <a href="http://www.newsday.com/business/ny-spciti036022315feb03,0,749462.story">New York Newsday</a> is quoting a team official "We're committed to our agreement with Citi, and Citi has indicated it is committed to users." He went on to defend Citi, saying that the bank "needs to advertise."<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/the-citigroup-ny-mets-deal-is-nuts/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The Citigroup-NY Mets deal is nuts</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/the-citigroup-ny-mets-deal-is-nuts/">The Citigroup-NY Mets deal is nuts</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 03 Feb 2009 12:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nydailynews.com/money/2009/02/03/2009-02-03_report_citigroup_eyeing_bailout_from_nam.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/the-citigroup-ny-mets-deal-is-nuts/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1448853/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/the-citigroup-ny-mets-deal-is-nuts/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>baseball</category><category>c</category><category>featured</category><category>jerry manuel</category><category>JerryManuel</category><category>major league baseball</category><category>MajorLeagueBaseball</category><category>NY Mets</category><category>NyMets</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 12:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Citi should have canceled Mets stadium naming deal six months ago]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/citi-should-have-canceled-400-million-mets-stadium-naming-deal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/citi-should-have-canceled-400-million-mets-stadium-naming-deal/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/citi-should-have-canceled-400-million-mets-stadium-naming-deal/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/business-of-sports/" rel="tag">Business of Sports</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/02/citigrouppic.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Last July I <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/20/will-citi-fall-victim-to-the-stadium-naming-curse/">suggested</a> that <strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">Citigroup</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C</a>) should cancel its $400 million deal to put its name on the new New York Mets stadium. Although previous CEO Chuck Prince inked the 20-year deal, I called for it to be canceled after Citi posted $17 billion in losses for the first half of 2008. Not surprisingly, it took more than my blog post to push Citi to cancel the $400 million deal.</p>
<p>After getting $45 billion in government bailout cash and another $305 billion in loan guarantees; and canceling the delivery of a $50 million corporate jet, it comes as no surprise that Citi is beginning to realize that times have changed. But as I suggested last July, there is a rich history of companies naming stadiums after themselves and soon ceasing to exist. For instance, there used to be a stadium in Houston named after a little energy trading firm you may have heard of -- Enron.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/citi-should-have-canceled-400-million-mets-stadium-naming-deal/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Citi should have canceled Mets stadium naming deal six months ago</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/citi-should-have-canceled-400-million-mets-stadium-naming-deal/">Citi should have canceled Mets stadium naming deal six months ago</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 03 Feb 2009 09:03:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://uk.reuters.com/article/usTopNews/idUKTRE51213720090203>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/citi-should-have-canceled-400-million-mets-stadium-naming-deal/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1448606/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/03/citi-should-have-canceled-400-million-mets-stadium-naming-deal/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>advertising</category><category>c</category><category>citigroup</category><category>featured</category><category>major league baseball</category><category>MajorLeagueBaseball</category><category>mets</category><category>naming rights</category><category>NamingRights</category><category>New Yotk Mets</category><category>NewYotkMets</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 09:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Chicago ObamaSox?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/27/the-chicago-obamasox/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/27/the-chicago-obamasox/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/27/the-chicago-obamasox/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/business-of-sports/" rel="tag">Business of Sports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt=""  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/01/obamabaseball.jpg" />Gotta love it when the worlds of sports and politics combine ... I mean at least our founding fathers had enough sense to try and separate church and state, right? Perhaps this news isn't that big of a deal, but I thought it funny that we now have the Chicago White Sox releasing a special Barack Obama hat.<br /><br />That's right, the Chicago White Sox are fashioning a new hat based on their top fan in chief, President Obama. The Sox (not to be confused with the Sawx, don't bother me Boston fans) are going to release two special edition hats with Obama tributes on the back and the side of the cap.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/27/the-chicago-obamasox/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The Chicago ObamaSox?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/27/the-chicago-obamasox/">The Chicago ObamaSox?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 27 Jan 2009 16:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.sportsbusinessjournal.com/article/61341>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/27/the-chicago-obamasox/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1442436/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/27/the-chicago-obamasox/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>chicago white sox</category><category>ChicagoWhiteSox</category><category>featured</category><category>major league baseball</category><category>MajorLeagueBaseball</category><category>merchandising</category><category>obama</category><category>president obama</category><category>PresidentObama</category><category>white sox</category><category>WhiteSox</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 16:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Not so fast Under Armour, you're being sued by the Chicago Cubs]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/26/not-so-fast-under-armour-youre-being-sued-by-the-chicago-cubs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/26/not-so-fast-under-armour-youre-being-sued-by-the-chicago-cubs/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/26/not-so-fast-under-armour-youre-being-sued-by-the-chicago-cubs/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ua/" rel="tag">Under Armour'A' (UA)</a></p><img align="right" alt="" src="http://chicago.cubs.mlb.com/images/2007/02/15/QJq2yf5W.jpg" />Perhaps this is a post-season tilt that the Cubbies may actually be able to win. Sorry Chicago, but this blogger is a dyed-in-the-wool Cincinnati Reds fan ... and I love to take cheap shots at the competition whenever I can. <br /><br />You see, the Cubs are suing <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ua/nys">Under Armour, Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ua/nys">UA</a>) for breach of contract (check out <a href="http://www.sportsonesource.com">SportsOneSource Media</a> for the heads up). The UA logo is emblazoned on the left-center and right-center field doors embedded in the iconic ivy walls of Wrigley Field. <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/26/not-so-fast-under-armour-youre-being-sued-by-the-chicago-cubs/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Not so fast Under Armour, you're being sued by the Chicago Cubs</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/26/not-so-fast-under-armour-youre-being-sued-by-the-chicago-cubs/">Not so fast Under Armour, you're being sued by the Chicago Cubs</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/26/not-so-fast-under-armour-youre-being-sued-by-the-chicago-cubs/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1440348/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/26/not-so-fast-under-armour-youre-being-sued-by-the-chicago-cubs/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>business of sports</category><category>BusinessOfSports</category><category>Chicago Cubs</category><category>ChicagoCubs</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>Major League Baseball</category><category>MajorLeagueBaseball</category><category>sponsorship</category><category>ua</category><category>Under Armour</category><category>UnderArmour</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Tough timing for baseball's free agents]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/11/tough-timing-for-baseballs-free-agents/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/11/tough-timing-for-baseballs-free-agents/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/11/tough-timing-for-baseballs-free-agents/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/business-of-sports/" rel="tag">Business of Sports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img height="224" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/01/logo.gif" width="230" align="right" vspace="4" />It's a tough job market for everyone. In addition to all the investment bankers facing smaller bonuses, there's another group of people deserving of our sympathy: professional baseball players.</p>
<p>The sagging economy has Major League Baseball teams feeling a little bit cautious as far as free agent signings and on top of that, there is somewhat of a glut of players on the market. Experts are forecasting a drop in ticket sales, but baseball may prove to be somewhat recession proof because the deals with television networks that make up a large portion of revenue are long-term guaranteed contracts: Even if advertising revenue declines, that won't effect the league or its teams directly.</p>
<p>ESPN analyst Buster Olney <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/print/bwdaily/dnflash/content/jan2009/db2009019_042316.htm">tells <em>BusinessWeek</em></a> that the Boston Red Sox are "absolutely loaded" and well-poised to take advantage of the weak economy to score some good bargains on free agents.</p>
<p>The Red Sox are a great example of well-managed company. By not bowing to the pressure to overspend in good times (letting pricey free agents like Pedro Martinez and Johnny Damon walk), they have left themselves in a strong financial position that allows them to be take advantage of weakness and get more bang for their free agent buck when times are rough.</p>
<p>It's a shame more public companies aren't managed that way.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/11/tough-timing-for-baseballs-free-agents/">Tough timing for baseball's free agents</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 11 Jan 2009 16:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/11/tough-timing-for-baseballs-free-agents/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1425821/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/11/tough-timing-for-baseballs-free-agents/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Baseball</category><category>Major League Baseball</category><category>MLB</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 16:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Scott Boras on why Major League Baseball is better without a Salary Cap]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/02/scott-boras-on-why-major-league-baseball-is-better-without-a-sal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/02/scott-boras-on-why-major-league-baseball-is-better-without-a-sal/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/02/scott-boras-on-why-major-league-baseball-is-better-without-a-sal/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/business-of-sports/" rel="tag">Business of Sports</a></p><img hspace="4" height="140" width="232" vspace="4" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/01/mlb_logo.bmp.jpg" />After the New York Yankees signed the three biggest free agents on the market, Milwaukee Brewers owner Mark Attanasio <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/25/does-major-league-baseball-need-a-salary-cap/">sent an email</a> to Bloomberg calling for a salary cap: "At the rate the Yankees are going, I'm not sure anyone can compete with them. Frankly, the sport might need a salary cap." He added that "I paid $220 million for my team; now they get three players for $420 million."<br /><br />Under a salary cap system, teams would be limited as far as how much they can spend on player salaries each year -- the idea is to allow smaller-market teams to be competitive.<br /><br />But in an <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/28450814">interview with CNBC</a>, Scott Boras -- the controversial super-agent who represents Mark Teixeira, Manny Ramirez and many others -- explained why he doesn't think baseball should have a salary cap. Of course it's a pretty self-serving argument but here's what he said:<em> </em>"I'm not sure what a salary cap does other than it prevents choices."<br /><br />Of course Scott Boras could sell a champion sailor to a guy in the desert, but he actually might be onto something with this one: The free agent frenzy of out of control spending adds a "Hot Stove" season to baseball that others sports lack. And for all the talk about big budget teams killing competitiveness, the two teams that made it to the World Series ranked 13th and 29th (second to last) on the list of <a href="http://www.sportsline.com/mlb/salaries">teams with the biggest budgets.</a><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/02/scott-boras-on-why-major-league-baseball-is-better-without-a-sal/">Scott Boras on why Major League Baseball is better without a Salary Cap</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 02 Jan 2009 09:27:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.cnbc.com/id/28450814>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/02/scott-boras-on-why-major-league-baseball-is-better-without-a-sal/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1416220/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/02/scott-boras-on-why-major-league-baseball-is-better-without-a-sal/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Baseball</category><category>featured</category><category>Major League Baseball</category><category>MajorLeagueBaseball</category><category>Milwaukee Brewers</category><category>MilwaukeeBrewers</category><category>MLB</category><category>New York Yankees</category><category>NewYorkYankees</category><category>Salary Cap</category><category>SalaryCap</category><category>Scott Boras</category><category>ScottBoras</category><category>World series</category><category>WorldSeries</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 09:27:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Does Major League Baseball need a salary cap?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/25/does-major-league-baseball-need-a-salary-cap/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/25/does-major-league-baseball-need-a-salary-cap/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/25/does-major-league-baseball-need-a-salary-cap/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/business-of-sports/" rel="tag">Business of Sports</a></p><img height="162" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/mlb_logo.bmp.jpg" width="268" align="right" vspace="4" />With the signings of C.C. Sabathia, A.J. Burnett and Mark Teixeira, The New York Yankees have signed the three biggest contracts of the off-season.<br /><br />That spending spree is raising concerns about competitive balance in baseball, and Milwaukee Brewers owner Mark Attanasio is none too pleased. In an <a href="http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20081223&amp;content_id=3727641&amp;vkey=hotstove2008&amp;fext=.jsp">email to Bloomberg</a>, he wrote that "At the rate the Yankees are going, I'm not sure anyone can compete with them. Frankly, the sport might need a salary cap."<br /><br />In a phone interview with Bloomberg, he added that "I paid $220 million for my team; now they get three players for $420 million." Brewers assistant general manager Gord Ash had some fighting words for the Yankees: "This is very reminiscent of what they have tried before. It didn't work then, and I'm not sure it's going to work now."<br /><br />Whether baseball will ever end up with a salary cap is an open question. Under the current system, teams that spend huge sums of money on players are required to pay a "luxury tax" to the league, but that seems to do little to dissuade these signings.<br /><br />For the sport as a business, a salary cap seems to be the way to go. This arms race hurts profitability for all teams, and it certainly seems to be having a negative impact on team values. According to Forbes, the average National Football League team, which operates under a salary cap with non-guaranteed contracts, is worth $1.04 billion. In baseball, only the Yankees are valued at more than $1 billion, and the league average is just $472 million.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/25/does-major-league-baseball-need-a-salary-cap/">Does Major League Baseball need a salary cap?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 25 Dec 2008 16:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20081223&amp;content_id=3727641&amp;vkey=hotstove2008&amp;fext=.jsp>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/25/does-major-league-baseball-need-a-salary-cap/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1410831/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/25/does-major-league-baseball-need-a-salary-cap/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Brewers</category><category>Major League Baseball</category><category>MajorLeagueBaseball</category><category>MLB</category><category>Salary Cap</category><category>SalaryCap</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2008 16:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Let Mark Cuban buy the Chicago Cubs!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/03/let-mark-cuban-buy-the-chicago-cubs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/03/let-mark-cuban-buy-the-chicago-cubs/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/03/let-mark-cuban-buy-the-chicago-cubs/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/business-of-sports/" rel="tag">Business of Sports</a></p><p><img height="160" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/08/chicago_cubs_logo.png" width="160" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" />Sam Zell is looking to unload the Chicago Cubs baseball franchise that came with his ill-timed $8.2 billion acquisition of Tribune Media Co., and the most aggressive suitor appears to be dot-com billionaire Mark Cuban. <em>The New York Times</em> reports that he <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/03/sports/baseball/03cubs.html?ref=business&amp;pagewanted=all">offered $1.3 billion for the the team</a>, Wrigley Field, and the team's stake in Comcast SportsNet Chicago.</p>
<p>But of course, Cuban, who has accumulated $1.7 million in fines during his tenure as owner of the Dallas Mavericks, is not without his critics, to say the least. He's too arrogant, too brash, and not gentlemanly enough, they say. He had trouble cracking into the old boy's network of the NBA, and Major League Baseball is said to be even more reluctant to change.</p>
<p>But if Cuban is the high bidder -- and the league will let him in -- it'll be a great day for the Cubs and for baseball. The team hasn't won a World Series since 1908 but, given Cuban's deep pockets and superhuman competitive drive, the Cubs would likely get the extra boost they need to finally win one. Plus, Cubs and Cuban have the same first three letters, so it's pretty much meant to be.</p>
<p>Baseball has dealt with a lot of scandal lately involving performance-enhancing drugs, and it's about time we added a passionate renegade to the current regime of old bureaucrats. And yes, I'm talking to you Ted Lerner.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/03/let-mark-cuban-buy-the-chicago-cubs/">Let Mark Cuban buy the Chicago Cubs!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 03 Aug 2008 15:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/03/sports/baseball/03cubs.html?ref=business&amp;pagewanted=all>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/03/let-mark-cuban-buy-the-chicago-cubs/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1273851/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/03/let-mark-cuban-buy-the-chicago-cubs/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Baseball</category><category>Chicago Cubs</category><category>Comcast SportsNet Chicago</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Major League Baseball</category><category>Mark Cuban</category><category>Sam Zell</category><category>Ted Lerner</category><category>Tribune Media</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 15:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[It's all disgusting: C, CFC, MBIA, MER &amp; Roger Clemens]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/15/its-all-disgusting-c-cfc-mbia-mer-and-roger-clemens/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/15/its-all-disgusting-c-cfc-mbia-mer-and-roger-clemens/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/15/its-all-disgusting-c-cfc-mbia-mer-and-roger-clemens/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mer/" rel="tag">Merrill Lynch (MER)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cfc/" rel="tag">Countrywide Financial (CFC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bsc/" rel="tag">Bear Stearns Cos (BSC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mbi/" rel="tag">MBIA Inc (MBI)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="Roger Clemens"  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/roger-clemens.jpg" />Are you disgusted yet? This week <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/m-b-i-a-inc/mbi/nys">MBIA</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/m-b-i-a-inc/mbi/nys">MBI</a>) testified -- no they lobbied, hmm, actually they complained -- well the truth is they <em>whined </em>to Congress that short-seller William Ackman had trashed its reputation, and its stock for personal gain -- gee, no kidding -- but the big problem is he seems to have been correct to a major extent. For more on this see <a title="View MBIA asks Congress to fight its battles with Ackman on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/14/mbia-asks-congress-to-fight-its-battles-with-ackman/" target="_blank">MBIA asks Congress to fight its battles with Ackman</a> by Peter Cohan or <a title="View MBIA plays the spooky short-seller card on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/13/mbia-plays-the-spooky-short-seller-card/" target="_blank">MBIA plays the spooky short-seller card</a> by Zac Bissonnette.</p>
<p>I own MBIA shares and recently "adventured" into more, but it was not based on management crying foul and everything being just fine. I did it because I think the company will work through the mess over time and that it is oversold now based on fear. MBIA needs to focus on cleaning up its exposure to risk and underwriting standards and stop looking for scapegoats.</p>
<p>Others are in the same boat. There are times the squirming around the truth is painful to watch. This week we watched a baseball pitching icon, Roger Clemens, remind us once again of the first rule of holes: "If you're in one, stop digging." I'm afraid this truism that I often refer to will continue to be a recurring theme in my stories every so often, because some folks just don't get it.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/15/its-all-disgusting-c-cfc-mbia-mer-and-roger-clemens/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>It's all disgusting: C, CFC, MBIA, MER &amp; Roger Clemens</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/15/its-all-disgusting-c-cfc-mbia-mer-and-roger-clemens/">It's all disgusting: C, CFC, MBIA, MER &amp; Roger Clemens</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 15 Feb 2008 20:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/15/its-all-disgusting-c-cfc-mbia-mer-and-roger-clemens/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1108729/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/15/its-all-disgusting-c-cfc-mbia-mer-and-roger-clemens/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bear Stearns</category><category>BearStearns</category><category>BSC</category><category>C</category><category>CFC</category><category>Clemens</category><category>Countrywide Financial</category><category>CountrywideFinancial</category><category>featured</category><category>Liber</category><category>Major League Baseball</category><category>MajorLeagueBaseball</category><category>MBI</category><category>MBIA</category><category>MER</category><category>Merrill Lynch</category><category>MerrillLynch</category><category>Roger Clemens</category><category>RogerClemens</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 20:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Will the World Series be a home run for Rupert Murdoch?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/01/will-the-world-series-be-a-homerun-for-rupert-murdoch/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/01/will-the-world-series-be-a-homerun-for-rupert-murdoch/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/01/will-the-world-series-be-a-homerun-for-rupert-murdoch/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/business-of-sports/" rel="tag">Business of Sports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/rupert-murdoch-nws.jpg" alt="" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">News Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">NWS</a>) Chief Executive Rupert Murdoch is probably too busy plotting world domination to spend much time worrying about something trivial like baseball -- until now.</p>
<p>America's pastime is about to start post-season play, most of which will be televised on the company's Fox television network. Already, there was one huge surprise as the Philadelphia Phillies overtook the New York Mets to win the National League East. But this isn't the type of surprise that the media mogul probably likes because a team from a smaller media market beat one from a larger one.</p>
<p>Remember that last year's series between the St. Louis Cardinals and Detroit Tigers had <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15475631/">record-low television ratings</a>. Advertisers pay a premium price for television spots on the World Series because of the huge audience it attracts. Fox probably has guaranteed that the commercials will be seen by a set amount of viewers and must refund money to advertisers if these targets aren't hit.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/01/will-the-world-series-be-a-homerun-for-rupert-murdoch/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Will the World Series be a home run for Rupert Murdoch?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/01/will-the-world-series-be-a-homerun-for-rupert-murdoch/">Will the World Series be a home run for Rupert Murdoch?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 01 Oct 2007 11:55:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15475631/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/01/will-the-world-series-be-a-homerun-for-rupert-murdoch/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1002301/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/01/will-the-world-series-be-a-homerun-for-rupert-murdoch/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>arizona diamondbacks</category><category>ArizonaDiamondbacks</category><category>colorado rockies</category><category>ColoradoRockies</category><category>featured</category><category>fox</category><category>fox sports</category><category>FoxSports</category><category>major league baseball</category><category>MajorLeagueBaseball</category><category>new york mets</category><category>new york yankees</category><category>NewYorkMets</category><category>NewYorkYankees</category><category>nws</category><category>philadelphia phillies</category><category>PhiladelphiaPhillies</category><category>rupert murdoch</category><category>RupertMurdoch</category><category>television ratings</category><category>TelevisionRatings</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 11:55:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Taking a $752,467 stand: Bonds' ball to be branded]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/26/taking-a-752-467-stand-bonds-ball-to-be-branded/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/26/taking-a-752-467-stand-bonds-ball-to-be-branded/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/26/taking-a-752-467-stand-bonds-ball-to-be-branded/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/business-of-sports/" rel="tag">Business of Sports</a></p><img width="180" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="255" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/bonds.jpg" alt="" />During the past week or so, fashion designer Marc Ecko has been <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/19/what-to-do-with-the-barry-bonds-home-run-ball/">tabulating votes</a> to decide what to do with Barry Bonds' 756th home-run ball. The three choices offered in an online poll were: Bestow It, Brand It, Banish It. <br /><br />The fans <a target="_blank" href="http://www.vote756.com/marcecko/">have spoken</a>, and <a target="_blank" href="http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2007/baseball/mlb/09/26/bc.bbn.bonds.756ball.ap/">door-number-2 was selected</a>; the ball -- bought by Ecko for $752,467 -- will be marked with an asterisk before being handed over to the Baseball Hall of Fame in Cooperstown, NY. According to the site Ecko set up for the express purpose of voting, 34% favored giving the ball, unblemished, to the Hall of Fame. 19% of voters wanted the ball banished, and 47% preferred branding it. The asterisk merely serves as a permanent reminder that Hank Aaron's record was toppled by someone facing allegations of steroid use. Bonds has repeatedly denied knowingly taking any performance-enhancing drugs. <br /><br />Ecko and Hall of Fame president Dale Petroskey both appeared on NBC's <em>Today </em>show to discuss the matter. Petroskey noted that, regardless of the asterisk, "We're happy to get [the ball] ... we're a nonprofit history museum, so this ball wouldn't be coming to Cooperstown without Marc Ecko buying it from the fan who caught it." <br /><br />Bonds, naturally, had a <a target="_blank" href="http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/09/19/SP6JS8JMH.DTL">compelling opinion</a> on the matter, telling <em>The San Francisco Chronicle</em>, "[Marc Ecko's] stupid. He's an idiot ... What he's doing is stupid." <br /><br /><em>Beth Gaston Moon is an analyst at <a href="http://www.schaeffersresearch.com/">Schaeffer's Investment Research</a></em>.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/26/taking-a-752-467-stand-bonds-ball-to-be-branded/">Taking a $752,467 stand: Bonds' ball to be branded</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 26 Sep 2007 16:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2007/baseball/mlb/09/26/bc.bbn.bonds.756ball.ap/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/26/taking-a-752-467-stand-bonds-ball-to-be-branded/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/993640/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/26/taking-a-752-467-stand-bonds-ball-to-be-branded/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>756</category><category>756*</category><category>Barry Bonds</category><category>BarryBonds</category><category>baseball</category><category>Baseball hall of fame</category><category>BaseballHallOfFame</category><category>Cooperstown</category><category>Hank Aaron</category><category>HankAaron</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Major League Baseball</category><category>MajorLeagueBaseball</category><category>Marc Ecko</category><category>MarcEcko</category><category>MLB</category><category>San Francisco Giants</category><category>SanFranciscoGiants</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Beth Gaston Moon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 16:20:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
