<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Tyson Foods: Is a Bottom in Place at $15?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/10/tyson-foods-is-a-bottom-in-place-at-15/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/10/tyson-foods-is-a-bottom-in-place-at-15/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/10/tyson-foods-is-a-bottom-in-place-at-15/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tsn/" rel="tag">Tyson Foods'A' (TSN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/08/tyson-logo.jpg" alt="" />Food producer Tyson Foods (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/tyson-foods-inc/tsn/nys">TSN</a>), first discussed here <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/tyson-foods-meandering-into-the-new-year/#continued">on May 11, 2009</a>, at a price of $12.35, finally appears to have found some traction, and I obviously still like the shares at this stage.</p>
<p>The shares of Tyson downtrended <a href="http://clearstation.etrade.com/cgi-bin/details?Symbol=tsn&amp;Refer=http://clearstation.etrade.com/cgi-bin/details%3fSymbol%3dmbi">in bear-hug fashion</a> for much of 2010, walking down to about $15 from $20. However, since then the shares found support at $15 and have since popped back up above $17, including a nice move above the key, 50-day moving average.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/10/tyson-foods-is-a-bottom-in-place-at-15/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Tyson Foods: Is a Bottom in Place at $15?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/10/tyson-foods-is-a-bottom-in-place-at-15/">Tyson Foods: Is a Bottom in Place at $15?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 10 Dec 2010 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/10/tyson-foods-is-a-bottom-in-place-at-15/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19756034/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/10/tyson-foods-is-a-bottom-in-place-at-15/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>chicken</category><category>emerging markets</category><category>featured</category><category>meat</category><category>protein</category><category>TSN</category><category>tyson foods</category><category>Tyson revenue</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Tyson Foods Stock Sells on Q3 News]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/09/tyson-foods-sold-on-q3-news/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/09/tyson-foods-sold-on-q3-news/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/09/tyson-foods-sold-on-q3-news/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tsn/" rel="tag">Tyson Foods'A' (TSN)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/08/tyson-logo.jpg"  alt="Tyson TSN logo" />Poor Tyson Foods (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/tyson-foods-inc/tsn/nys">TSN</a>). When I <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/10/tyson-foods-drops-on-q2-data/">last wrote</a> about the company back in May, I found that its shares were under pressure after a quarterly report was issued. Today, the same thing has occurred: investors were getting rid of the stock upon a fresh round of earnings data. My condolences to those who own this name in their portfolio. <br />
<br />
The results weren't as bad as the selling would make it seem. For the <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/company-news/tyson-foods-reports-quarterly-earnings-of-65-cents-per-share/19585986/">fiscal third quarter</a>, the business made 65 cents per share versus 35 cents per share in the year-ago period. According to <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6781SA20100809">Reuters</a>, adjusted profit of 67 cents per share beat projections by nine pennies. The actual <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/rtn/pr/tyson-reports-third-quarter-and-nine-months-results/rfid356067367/?channel=pf">press release</a> shows an expansion in operating cash flow: $1.1 billion was booked this time around over the last three quarters; $684 million was recorded in the comparable frame.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/09/tyson-foods-sold-on-q3-news/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Tyson Foods Stock Sells on Q3 News</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/09/tyson-foods-sold-on-q3-news/">Tyson Foods Stock Sells on Q3 News</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 09 Aug 2010 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/company-news/tyson-foods-reports-quarterly-earnings-of-65-cents-per-share/19585986/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/09/tyson-foods-sold-on-q3-news/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19586814/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/09/tyson-foods-sold-on-q3-news/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>farming</category><category>inthenews</category><category>meat</category><category>poultry</category><category>TSN</category><category>tyson foods</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Wet harvest causes grain prices to rise 7.7%. Should we buy our Wheaties now?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/02/wet-harvest-casuses-grain-prices-to-rise-7-7-should-we-buy-our/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/02/wet-harvest-casuses-grain-prices-to-rise-7-7-should-we-buy-our/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/02/wet-harvest-casuses-grain-prices-to-rise-7-7-should-we-buy-our/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/agriculture/" rel="tag">Agriculture</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/11/farm_wheat.jpg" width="220" height="252" alt="" />We've had wet weather in the Midwest <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D9BLKMNG0.htm">during the harvest season</a>, resulting in higher grain prices.</p>
<p>The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) issued a report on wholesale crop prices paid to farmers. Let's look at some prices:</p>
<ul>
    <li>Corn rose 29 cents per bushel to $3.54 </li>
    <li>Wheat jumped 8 cents per bushel to $4.56 </li>
    <li>Soybeans dropped 1 cent per bushel to $9.74 </li>
    <li>Wholesale milk prices jumped 7.1% in October to $1.19 per gallon. Milk prices, however are down 22% from last year. </li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/02/wet-harvest-casuses-grain-prices-to-rise-7-7-should-we-buy-our/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Wet harvest causes grain prices to rise 7.7%. Should we buy our Wheaties now?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/02/wet-harvest-casuses-grain-prices-to-rise-7-7-should-we-buy-our/">Wet harvest causes grain prices to rise 7.7%. Should we buy our Wheaties now?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 02 Nov 2009 18:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D9BLKMNG0.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/02/wet-harvest-casuses-grain-prices-to-rise-7-7-should-we-buy-our/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19217660/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/02/wet-harvest-casuses-grain-prices-to-rise-7-7-should-we-buy-our/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>food</category><category>grain prices</category><category>GrainPrices</category><category>harvest</category><category>inthenews</category><category>meat</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 18:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Makeover needed: McDonald's]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/25/makeover-needed-mcdonalds/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/25/makeover-needed-mcdonalds/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/25/makeover-needed-mcdonalds/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mcd/" rel="tag">McDonald's (MCD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/agriculture/" rel="tag">Agriculture</a></p><p><em><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/10/makeover-17-200cm101608.jpg" alt="" />This post is part of a feature on companies and products that our bloggers think are in need of a makeover.</em> <a target="_blank" href="http://www.walletpop.com/specials/makeovers-needed"><em>See all 26</em></a><em>.</em></p>
<p>McDonald's has been hit by one serious critique after another of food safety and nutrition. The company has gone from being a family chain to something only those desperate to save time or money want. There have been half-hearted efforts to modernize, but what McDonald's really needs is a complete menu makeover.</p>
<p>I'm not talking about changing away from hamburgers in all their infinite variety, either. But over the last couple decades the eating public has gotten a lot more picky and worried about getting fat or sick from mad cow disease or some contaminant.</p>
<p>There have been many serious critiques of their impact on worldwide nutrition. Eric Schlosser described in <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Fast-Food-Nation-Eric-Schlosser/dp/0060838582/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1224271177&amp;sr=8-1"><em>Fast Food Nation</em></a> how mega-producer McDonald's uses butchering assembly lines. In an era of food safety concern, "a single fast-food hamburger now contains meat from dozens or even hundreds of different cattle." Morgan Spurlock examined in the movie <em>Supersize Me</em> and a <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Dont-Eat-This-Book-Supersizing/dp/0425210235/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1224271542&amp;sr=1-4">related book</a> what happens when an individual -- or a whole country -- eats too much McDonald's.</p>
<p>Of course, McDonald's is facing pressure from the other side, too. We want cheap food. Especially in a recession, people love the dollar menu. But McDonald's has just got to improve the food.<br /></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/25/makeover-needed-mcdonalds/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Makeover needed: McDonald's</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/25/makeover-needed-mcdonalds/">Makeover needed: McDonald's</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 25 Oct 2008 13:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/25/makeover-needed-mcdonalds/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1345711/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/25/makeover-needed-mcdonalds/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>fast</category><category>fast food nation</category><category>food</category><category>food safety</category><category>hamburger</category><category>makeover</category><category>mcdonalds</category><category>meat</category><category>schlosser</category><category>spurl</category><category>spurlock</category><category>supersize</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Carol Vinzant]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 13:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Looking for a way to play China? Check out Potash]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/23/looking-for-a-way-to-play-china-check-out-potash/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/23/looking-for-a-way-to-play-china-check-out-potash/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/23/looking-for-a-way-to-play-china-check-out-potash/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/india/" rel="tag">India</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/russia/" rel="tag">Russia</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/eastern-europe/" rel="tag">Eastern Europe</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pot/" rel="tag">Potash Corp. of Saskatchewan (POT)</a></p><p>While investors still hunger to capitalize on the double-digit growth in China, as well as strong growth in emerging markets like India, Russia, and other Eastern European countries, many have turned somewhat gun-shy when it comes to investing directly in those countries firms. With many speculating that we will see the market bubble pop in China, and the boomerang effect that will have for all emerging markets, the question becomes, how to still profit form the growth without getting caught up in the stock market bubble. The answer is look at fertilizers, notably <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/potash-corporation-of-saskatchewan-inc/pot/nys">Potash Corp. of Saskatchewan</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/potash-corporation-of-saskatchewan-inc/pot/nys">POT</a>). The Canadian company is the world's largest that specializes in potash, a form of potassium carbonate, as well as nitrogen and phosphate.</p>
<p>With <a href="http://israelnewsletter.com/blog/">emerging</a> economies booming, citizens have exited the cycle of poverty and joined the middle class. As such, with much more disposable income, they have changed their <a href="http://israelnewsletter.com/israeli-stocks-trading-in-the-us/">standard of living</a> and are consuming much more meat than anytime previously. This means that as more and more cattle are raised, more and more feed is needed to feed the animals, which means more fertilizer is needed to help grow the feed. </p>
<p>Potash stock has grown faster than a weed this year. Even so, with fertilizer prices continuing to move higher, plus the boost in the U.S. as farmers have changed over their crops to grow ethanol, Potash is poised to keep growing well into 2008.</p>
<p><em>Aaron Katsman is the lead Portfolio Manager and Managing Director of America Israel Investment Associates, LLC. and Senior Editor of </em><a href="http://www.israelnewsletter.com/"><em>IsraelNewsletter.com</em></a><em>. Disclosure: Writer has no position in any stock mentioned as of 12/20/07.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/23/looking-for-a-way-to-play-china-check-out-potash/">Looking for a way to play China? Check out Potash</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 23 Dec 2007 11:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/23/looking-for-a-way-to-play-china-check-out-potash/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1069487/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/23/looking-for-a-way-to-play-china-check-out-potash/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>China</category><category>emerging markets</category><category>ethanol</category><category>fertilizer</category><category>meat</category><category>POT</category><category>Potash</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron Katsman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 11:10:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
