<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Media World: Use of anonymous sources on Microsoft-Yahoo! deal got out of hand]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/05/media-world-use-of-anonymous-sources-on-microsoft-yahoo-deal-go/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/05/media-world-use-of-anonymous-sources-on-microsoft-yahoo-deal-go/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/05/media-world-use-of-anonymous-sources-on-microsoft-yahoo-deal-go/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/highfive.jpg" />When it comes to big merger news, investors let the media get away with making sleazy deals with sources in exchange for access. The case of the aborted <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corp. </a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) -- <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) deal is no different.<br /><br />Investors would be nauseated by the amount of butts that get kissed behind the scenes during these drawn-out sagas. Reporters suck up to companies, public relations people and investment bankers and vice versa. I saw some of this first hand when I worked for Bloomberg and would write about deals from time to time.<br /><br /> Since the number of people who actually know anything about an acquisition is fairly small, members of the media contort themselves into rhetorical knots to protect the identities of the people who are spilling the beans. That's why these types of stories are filled with phrases that no one would ever utter in daily conversation such as a "person familiar with the situation" or a "person familiar with (insert executive's or company's name) thinking"or my personal favorite "a person close to the company."<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/05/media-world-use-of-anonymous-sources-on-microsoft-yahoo-deal-go/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Media World: Use of anonymous sources on Microsoft-Yahoo! deal got out of hand</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/05/media-world-use-of-anonymous-sources-on-microsoft-yahoo-deal-go/">Media World: Use of anonymous sources on Microsoft-Yahoo! deal got out of hand</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 05 May 2008 13:24:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/05/technology/05subyahoo-web.html?_r=1&amp;oref=slogin>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/05/media-world-use-of-anonymous-sources-on-microsoft-yahoo-deal-go/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1186696/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/05/media-world-use-of-anonymous-sources-on-microsoft-yahoo-deal-go/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>Jerry Yang</category><category>media</category><category>media criticism</category><category>MediaCriticism</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>Yahoo</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 13:24:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Media World: Why <i>Forbes</i> needs a geography lesson]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/03/media-world-forbes-learns-a-hard-geography-lesson/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/03/media-world-forbes-learns-a-hard-geography-lesson/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/03/media-world-forbes-learns-a-hard-geography-lesson/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mandftoday/" rel="tag">Money and Finance Today</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><em>Forbes </em>magazine needs a good map or two.</p>
<p>The business magazine's article <a href="http://www.forbes.com/2007/07/20/weather-storms-us-biz-cx_tvr_0720weather.html?partner=aol">"America's Wildest Weather Cities" </a>lists two places that don't exist. Blue Hill, Mass, dubbed the windiest city, is incorrectly described as a Boston suburb. Actually, there is a place called Blue Hill, The Blue Hill Reservation, a 7,000-acre state park<a href="http://www.mass.gov/dcr/parks/metroboston/blue.htm"> that seems lovely</a>. The Web site lists its address in Milton, Mass. There is no town named Blue Hill in the Boston area, according to the Greater Boston Convention and Vistors Bureau.</p>
<p>More embarrassing is the description of Springfield, Mississippi. I could find no town by that name in Mississippi although there is a Springfield Plantation near Natchez which reviewers on <a href="http://travel.yahoo.com/p-reviews-2990738-prod-travelguide-action-read-ratings_and_reviews-i;_ylt=AnTFvauEtOVr7kDZJpbSpykMSGoL">Yahoo Travel</a> seemed to like. Even odder, though, was that <em>Forbes </em>describes Springfield as "a slightly elevated city in the Ozarks at 1,266 feet." As this <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:OzarkRelief.jpg">helpful map</a> on Wikipedia shows, the Ozarks don't go into Mississippi. Interestingly, there is a city in Missouri named Springfield that happens to be located at an elevation of 1,266 feet and is known as <a href="http://www.legendsofamerica.com/MO-Springfield.html">Queen of the Ozarks</a>. Perhaps, <em>Forbes </em>was thinking of that Springfield or the one where the Simpsons reside.</p>
<p>Though I hate to spoil today's company holiday at <em>Forbes</em>, there is a bigger issue at stake here. In today's age of instant communication, readers need to be more skeptical now than they ever have been. Wrong information can be spread with an alarming speed. </p>
<p>Should <em>Forbes </em>have caught these errors before the story was published? Of course. But the news gathering and writing process isn't fool proof. Mistakes, though unfortunate, are unavoidable. No one is perfect.</p>
<p>But what separates journalists from people who just post stuff is how they deal with errors when they are pointed out. I've contacted the reporter who wrote the story and will let you know if I get a response.</p>
<p><strong>Update</strong>: Forbes has corrected the errors.</p>
<p><br /></p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/03/media-world-forbes-learns-a-hard-geography-lesson/">Media World: Why <i>Forbes</i> needs a geography lesson</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 03 Aug 2007 14:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/forbes/general/extreme-weather-cities>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/03/media-world-forbes-learns-a-hard-geography-lesson/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/957144/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/03/media-world-forbes-learns-a-hard-geography-lesson/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Blue Hill Reservation</category><category>BlueHillReservation</category><category>Boston</category><category>forbes</category><category>forbes magazine</category><category>ForbesMagazine</category><category>media criticism</category><category>media world</category><category>MediaCriticism</category><category>MediaWorld</category><category>mississippi</category><category>missouri</category><category>Natchez</category><category>Springfield, Missouri</category><category>Springfield,Missouri</category><category>weather</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 14:45:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
