Many economists, analysts, traders and others agree it's way too soon to assess the impact of this latest, mortgage-related jolt on the stock and bond markets, and on the U.S. and global economies.

There are too many moving parts, and too many unknowns to form meaningful, enduring conclusions. The reason? The financial world order we see today may not, in fact, be the financial world order we see tomorrow. The Dow was down about 256 points to 11,165 early Monday afternoon.

But there is one conclusion U.S. investors / citizens can form regarding the U.S. economy, so says an economist: expanding credit and rising home prices, in and of themselves, are not engines of economic growth.

Now, everyone's recognizing 'the obvious'

"We have now entered the age of recognizing the obvious," economist Richard Felson said. "Almost everyone knew that the booming housing market would slow down as soon as all potential buyers had been tapped and as the American economy slowed. But few foresaw the impact the slowdown would have on mortgage bonds, their owners, and the financial system. We now have to rebuild the American credit market, and global credit market, as well, to a degree. It will be a major task."

The primary source of all the above, in Felson's interpretation? Structural problems in the U.S. economy, primarily a lack of jobs, or low job growth, he said.

"For the better part of four years, America went blithely along, confident that the fundamentals of the [U.S.] economy were sound. Yet all the while, job growth and its companion, rising median wages, were inadequate. But they were ignored because corporate earnings were up and home values were rising. But it was a building constructed on quicksand," Felson said. "The boom was not sustainable. The [U.S.] economy did not have growth engines in place for sustainable growth. "

One issue likely to influence voters' choice for U.S. president in November is the U.S. economy.

The Iraq War/War on Terror, and other issues, such as health care concerns, are likely to be factors as well, but look for concern about the economy to be paramount. Of course, political science teaches us that party identification and voters' attitude toward each candidate will also help determine the vote for president.

(In a nutshell, the political science theory that best predicts vote is PI + ATC + MSI = Vote. Or, Party Identification + Attitude Toward the Candidate + Most Salient Issues = Vote. But more on that, some other time.)

Further, regarding the U.S. economy, there's been considerable coverage regarding its health -- sometimes too much -- but not as much clarity. So, without further ado, some "givens" or clarity about the U.S. economy.

• U.S. GDP: The U.S. economy is experiencing anemic growth, but technically, it is not in a recession. Unemployment is trending up -- now at 6.1% -- put is still relatively low, compared to unemployment levels in previous economic slowdowns. [Note: The above is not to slight anyone who has lost his/her job; each job lost is a serious problem/concern for the person involved.]
• Median income: The median U.S. family income is down. In 2006 the median U.S. family income, adjusted for inflation, was $58,407, according to the most recent U.S. Census Bureau data, down from $59,398 in 2000. Since the economic slowdown started in October 2007, it's possible, but not likely, that median family income rose in 2008, but more than likely it fell. Moreover, it probably fell during that time period, for most families.

With oil at $135 a barrel - up 463% since January 2001, Washington wrings its hands and says there's nothing it can do to lower the price. I think that's nonsense. There are two things that Washington can do today to get the price down: raise interest rates and close the swaps loophole.

What is the role of speculators in the price of oil and other commodities and what should be done to get those prices down? Some argue that oil prices are set by supply and demand. But if that were true, oil would drop because global demand is forecast to grow 1.2 million bbl/day -- and demand in the U.S. is down 300,000 barrels a day -- while global supply is expected to rise 2 million bbl/day.

Perhaps sixty percent of trading volume in oil is due to speculators -- these traders bet on a declining dollar and a rising price of oil. Raising interest rates would help lower the value of the dollar which has lost 70% of its value relative to the Euro since January 2001. Our Fed Funds rate fell from 5.25% to 2% since last August whereas in Europe, their rate is 4% and expected to rise. This difference makes Euros a more attractive currency for investors. So if the U.S. raises interest rates, people will start to buy dollars instead.