An era of greed that began with the election of Ronald Reagan has come to an abrupt end. That means that the seething emotions of greed and envy that come along with bonus time at investment banks will have fewer dollars attached to them. And talent will flow to government and academia rather than Wall Street. This could be good for the U.S.

Some of those masters of the universe in the investment banking industry have seen the value of their stock tumble (and many of them are going without bonuses this year). Here are some of the "casualties":

John Thain may look like superman, but he's only human. According to my brother William D. Cohan's article in Fortune, Thain contributed mightily to his efforts to get himself fired following the takeover of Merill Lynch by Bank Of America (NYSE: BAC). Now Thain is trying to salvage his reputation by offering to repay Bank of America for the $1.2 million he spent to decorate his office.

Thain's career suicide involved five key steps:

• Thain tossed out his Merrill deputies Greg Fleming and Robert McCann;
• He was late to disclose some $15.31 billion in trading losses that may have derailed the deal if they had been disclosed earlier;
• He took a year-end vacation at Vail and signed up for this week's Davos fest (against his boss, Ken Lewis's advice);
• He paid $4 billion in bonuses to Merrill workers before the deal closed -- although Bank of America knew about them so Thain should not get all the blame for these;
• He spent $1.2 million to redecorate his office.

Now Thain is going to try to partially reverse the damage from the last item in his career suicide process.

Former Merrill Lynch CEO John Thain has resigned from his post at Bank of America (NYSE: BAC), not long after the consummation of a merger that threatens that company's very survival.

"Ken Lewis flew to New York today to talk to John" and "they mutually agreed that his situation was not working and he resigned," Bank of America spokesman Robert Stickler told The New York Times.

Ken Lewis was upset with Mr. Thain partly because the merger was a disaster and partly because he realized that Thain did not have a strong grasp of the company's operations. Worse, Thain had made earlier than planned bonus payments to Merrill Lynch employees shortly before the deal was done.

And all of this came before the news of Thain's wasteful spending on interior decor was made public.

There is one silver lining though. Bank of America's spokesman was honest enough to say that "things were not working out" instead of hiding behind the usual "He resigned to spend more time with his family and charitable endeavors."

Score one for transparency.

The Daily Beast (where I also write a column) columnist and CNBC reporter Charlie Gasparino reports that Merrill Lynch CEO John Thain spent $1.22 million to redecorate his office last year while the company slashed jobs and fought for its survival.

Citing documents obtained by the site, Gasparino reports that the company spent $800,000 "to hire famed celebrity designer Michael Smith, who is currently redesigning the White House for the Obama family for just $100,000."

I was going to make a reference to former Tyco CEO Dennis Kozlowski and the $6,000 shower curtain, but one of Gasparino's sources beat me to it. Thain's version of an emperor's office includes:

• Area Rug: $87,784
• Pair of chairs: $28,091
• Pendant Light Fixture: $19,751

Now, $1.22 million is not a material amount of money given the scope of Merrill's problems, but it is indicative of how out of touch and arrogant John Thain was and presumably is. The fact he spent $230,000 in one year on a single driver will also do little to muster political support for additional bailout initiatives, and gives a huge amount of ammunition to the "Tell Wall Street to go to hell" crowd.

Not a good move, Mr. Thain, not a good move. If he has any class he'll offer to reimburse the company for those expenses, but I doubt that he will. Even if he does, it's too late.

That's right folks -- you're not the one who bought Merrill Lynch without doing any due diligence. But that doesn't mean you're not paying for it. Bank of America (NYSE: BAC) CEO Ken Lewis is the one who skipped that due diligence and now he's shocked to discover that Merrill Lynch is full of toxic waste. So he threatened to back away from the deal and guess who is stepping up? You are.

How much are you going to fork over so Ken Lewis can have his Merrill Lynch? You'll pay $20 billion for a capital injection and cover $100 billion in potential losses. To be more specific, a deal for the U.S. to invest $20 billion in Bank of America and to divide $118 billion in losses between Bank of America and the government is imminent. Bank of America would be responsible for the first $10 billion; the government would take on the next $10 billion in losses and then the government would absorb 90 percent of the next $98 billion. If this deal closes, the government will own $45 billion worth of Bank of America.

I find it interesting that $120 billion can go out of the taxpayer's pocket and into a bank's with the snap of a finger. By contrast, when the automobile industry wanted 10% of that amount we were involved in weeks of political wrangling, which ultimately resulted in a failed bill in Congress. And once again, it was us taxpayers who ended up forking over the money to bail out these big companies with their multimillion dollar management.

Peter Cohan is President of Peter S. Cohan & Associates. He also teaches management at Babson College. Portfolio published his eighth book, You Can't Order Change: Lessons From Jim McNerney's Turnaround at Boeing on December 26, 2008. He has no financial interest in the securities mentioned.

According to a Dow Jones report this morning, Citigroup (NYSE: C) has decided to cancel the Christmas party planned for its fixed-income staff in London. The soirée was supposed to be held this Thursday, December 11, but the financial firm apparently decided it was inappropriate to celebrate, considering the 52,000 job cuts it recently announced. The party's cancellation comes shortly after Citi scrapped a holiday celebration for its London equities division, which would have been held December 3.

Today's news from Citigroup is simply the most prominent report among a growing trend this year for U.S. corporations. In my own neighborhood, I can name more than a few companies who've axed their own Christmas plans in deference to the sorry state of the U.S. economy, as well as the continually growing unemployment rolls. It may be the holiday season, but it's harder than ever to find members of the working class who feel like celebrating.

If there's a silver lining to the anti-holiday mood, it's probably the growing trend toward prudent sacrifice among major corporations. Yesterday, we learned that executives at Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS) and Merrill Lynch (NYSE: MER) will forgo bonuses -- and regular pay, in some instances -- along with many of their peers at other investment banks. Is it the least these guys could do? Maybe. But, as any addict can tell you, the first step toward recovery is admitting you have a problem. Now that top executives are starting to shoulder some of the blame, Wall Street could finally be ready for rehab.

Elizabeth Harrow is an analyst and financial writer in the research department at Schaeffer's Investment Research. She is featured in the video series Schaeffer's Daily Q&A on SchaeffersResearch.com.

On Monday morning, Doug McIntyre posted that former Merrill Lynch CEO John Thain was demanding a $10 million bonus for his work there. But now CNBC is reporting that Thain won't be getting any bonus at all.

So far, details are not forthcoming but Charlie Gasparino, CNBC's On Air Edtior, reported that Thain, along with several other executives, will forgo bonuses this year. The Wall Street Journal is also reporting that according to people familiar with the matter, Thain, Merrill President Gregory Fleming and wealth management chief Robert McCann asked the board's compensation committee not to pay them for their work in 2008. So did two other Merrill executives.

Thain is being unfairly punished because the problems at Merrill happened under his predecessor Stan O'Neal. O'Neal walked away from the mountain of toxic waste he created with $161 million. He's the one who should be forking over a chunk of his compensation due to the problems he caused. To make Thain pay the price is unfair -- but politically expedient.

[Update: Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS) CEO John Mack would not get a bonus for a second straight year. The bank also announced compensation changes that should link pay and performance better.]

Peter Cohan is president of Peter S. Cohan & Associates. Portfolio will publish his book about Boeing, You Can't Order Change: Lessons from Jim McNerney's Turnaround at Boeing, on December 26, 2008. He has no financial interest in the securities mentioned.

Dell, Inc. (NASDAQ: DELL) won't see growth or gain market share in the next few quarters, according the brokerage house Merrill Lynch. So much so that the broker cut its rating on the PC maker to Neutral, citing the company's lack of catalyst to change anything about its bleak future as the business and consumer sectors continue to pull back their money.

But Dell wasn't the only one whacked. Merrill indicated that the market for PCs would be deteriorating through 2010, with a 2% free fall in 2009, contrasting against its earlier call of a 12% spike next year. In other words, it has no idea how the PC market is going to shake out. Might as well flip a coin.

Declining European and U.S. sales forecasts in the PC market are now showing up in the Asia Pacific and emerging markets as well. Although Merrill did say that expectations for growth in the newer netbook category would help offset softness in overall sales, I'm skeptical.

These newer netbooks are under-powered and are hard to type on (try one), even though the valiant attempt by PC makers to create a new category -- something that will sell -- is admirable. There will be a niche market for these devices (many of which cost as much as an on-sale full-size notebook), but that's it. If there's a bright future for these things plus any kind of profit margin that's respectable, I don't see it. That is, unless buyers like under-powered old hardware running old software with less features. But hey, it's small!

Around the world, governments are flooding the market with new currency in order to stem the tide of bank collapses and slippery stock market slopes. They are taking over financial institutions, absorbing debt, lowering interest rates, nationalizing some private companies, investing in others, and rebating taxes through stimulus packages to increase liquidity and spending.

So far all we can say is that the world is still open for business, but it is a different world. Even gold and oil are down significantly.

In concert with world markets, the stocks in my daring (maybe fool hardy) story I posted a few months ago Serious Money: Tempting fate with 10 financials -- buying into a pool of financial stocks at a time when the "hate 'em" factor was at a peak, or so I thought -- are down even more. I think I am turning into the web's leading glutton for punishment by posting such stories. However, while my stock ideas have taken a beating now and then, I hope my integrity has remained intact.

I took some major lumps during the collapse of Washington Mutual (NYSE: WM) as I candidly posted, Chasing Value: Not -- WaMu one week later - ouch!, and I lost some money also.

Nine of the ten financial stocks I wrote about are down or out at this point. When I last reported, the portfolio was losing 4.8%, and now it is losing 47% to date, not counting dividends. Only MBIA Inc. (NYSE: MBI) is up and there are question marks about this company too.

Merrill Lynch (NYSE: MER) CEO John Thain told Bloomberg that thousands of the company's employees will lose their jobs as part of the deal to be acquired by Bank of America (NYSE: BAC).

Information technology, operations and corporate functions will be the hardest hit, with commodities and fixed income unaffected. Merrill has already cut more than 5,000 positions over the past year and a half. Merrill currently has about 60,000 workers.

"We haven't mapped it out in terms of actual number of people, but we are committed to saving $7 billion across the combined platforms, and that will be a challenge,'' Thain said. "Between our two companies it will be clearly thousands of jobs.'

Given that Bank of America is paying about $28 billion for Merrill -- the closing price depends on where shares of Bank America close when the deal is finalized -- saving $7 billion per year will create substantial value: and possibly silence the huge number of critics who fear that Bank of America is overpaying given the valuations the market is currently applying to so many other banks.

But the huge job cuts signal that Bank of America is planning to integrate a good chunk of Merrill's operations, and that a post-merger Merrill Lynch will look very different from the company that has been built over the past 90-plus years.

Oil prices are significantly down from the summer high of $147 per barrel. Wednesday October 1, New York's main contract, light sweet crude for November delivery, lost $2.11 to close at 98.53 dollars a barrel.

Now Merrill Lynch (NYSE: MER) is slashing its outlook for oil prices. Not only do their analysts believe that oil will drop below $90 a barrel next year, but they add that there is a possibility it may drop below $50. Demand is shrinking and it's hard to call a bottom.

Given all the turmoil in the financial markets this year and with a looming "consumer credit bubble" being discussed in most business publications, it would be very advisable to use any savings from lower oil prices to pay down credit card debt.

Almost two months have passed since I posted Serious Money: Tempting fate with 10 financials - the results of buying into the following pool of financial stocks at a time when the "hate 'em" factor was at a peak, or so I thought. Now things are even worse, much worse, and a new market bottom was reached only last week.

Trying to predict where this market will go is not possible, but there are many ways to play it. I chose to buy into a pool of financial stocks, believing the survivors would post gains that would overshadow the losers.

When I last updated this story, the pool of stocks was up 26%. Things have gotten worse, but the group is still up 13.89% plus the dividends. This is better than any of the indices, although it is much more speculative.

There was plenty of big news since the last report. While Lehman Brothers Holdings (OTC: LEHMQ) went bankrupt, MBIA Inc (NYSE: MBI) made up for it by more than doubling. Meanwhile, Merrill Lynch (NYSE: MER) is in survival mode supported by a Bank of America (NYSE: BAC) buyout offer. Seven stocks are up, two are down and one is gone (returns from July 29 prices):

Late Sunday night it was reported by the Associated Press that the Federal Reserve announced it had approved the request of the two investment banks, Goldman Sachs Group (NYSE: GS) and Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS), to become commercial banks and to take deposits, bolstering the resources of both institutions.

Since Bear Stearns was acquired in a fire sale by J P.Morgan Chase (NYSE: JPM) in March both firms have been under increased pressure to show their financial strength, but the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers Holdings (NYSE: LEH) and the buyout of Merrill Lynch (NYSE: MER) by Bank of America (NYSE: BAC) last weekend have changed the playing field too much.

So what does this mean in short? It means the investment banks wanted the comfort and security of mama bear. They wanted the protection of the Federal Reserve, along with the ability to borrow from it at the discount window, and in a worst case scenario, to be bailed out like everyone else.

The Fed, from its perspective, knows this to be true and understands that if the investment banks -- now commercial banks -- can increase their reserves, then maybe a bailout will not be required, which is better for everyone. Along with this change will come additional requirements and regulation.

Sheldon Liber is the CEO of a small private investment company and the principal for design and research at an architecture & planning firm. He writes the columns Chasing Value and Serious Money. DISCLOSURE: I owned BSC and now own shares in its acquirer JPM.

The general consensus seems to be that, given the developments in the financial sector over the past few days, Merrill Lynch (NYSE: MER) shareholders did reasonably well in the deal that will make the company part of Bank of America (NYSE: BAC).

But where there's a will there's a way and where there's a $50 billion deal, there are lawyers looking for their cut. Reuters reports that a shareholder has filed a a lawsuit against Merrill with the New York Supreme Court, alleging that the deal is "wrong, unfair and harmful to Merrill public stockholders."

Murray, Frank & Sailer is representing that shareholder, while Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz has said it will also file a lawsuit on behalf of investors against both Merrill and Bank of America. The lawsuit states that the company's executives "are in possession of nonpublic information concerning the financial condition of prospects of Merrill . . . which they have not disclosed to Merrill public stockholders." The suit also alleges that Merril's executives and directors "have clear and material conflicts of interest and are acting to better their own interests at the expense of Merrill public shareholders."

The New York Times reports that following its acquisition of Countrywide and Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. (NYSE: MER), Bank of America (NYSE: BAC) may well be the dominant U.S. bank. Will that make it too big to fail in the years ahead? Or is it likely that when the economy recovers, it will have the strongest operation in place to grab a big share of that growth.

Its recent purchases indeed give Bank of America a strong market position in many segments of the financial services market. "Overnight, the shotgun merger will transform Bank of America into the nation's largest player in wealth management. It already holds the biggest branch network and is the largest issuer of credit cards, home equity loans and auto loans. In January, it paid $4 billion for Countrywide Financial, the troubled lender that was the nation's largest mortgage lending and payment collection operation," writes the New York Times.

With big acquisitions can come big risks. For example, Merrill still has plenty of problems with "$40 billion of real estate mortgage investments and $17 billion in commercial buildings," according to the Times. As I posted, Merrill had $40 a share worth of salable assets and Bank of America's $29 a share price effectively valued its liabilities at $11 a share. I admire the strategic boldness of Bank of America buying up market leaders at what may look in the future to be distressed prices.

But it remains to be seen whether those distressed prices were in fact too high because the liabilities Bank of America bought may turn out to be bigger than it gambled. If not, and if the economy recovers, Bank of America would be a screaming buy.

Peter Cohan is President of Peter S. Cohan & Associates. He also teaches management at Babson College and edits The Cohan Letter. He has no financial interest in the securities mentioned.