<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Schlumberger (SLB): A 'Great Opportunity']]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/31/schlumberger-slb-a-great-opportunity/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/31/schlumberger-slb-a-great-opportunity/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/31/schlumberger-slb-a-great-opportunity/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newsletters/" rel="tag">Newsletters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/slb/" rel="tag">Schlumberger Limited (SLB)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/slb-logo-240.jpg"  alt="Schlumberger (SLB) logo" />"Schlumberger Limited (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/schlumberger-limited/slb/nys">SLB</a>) is the world's leading oil services company, assisting in exploration, production and most other oil services; its operations include being a leader in applying proprietary technologies to extract hard-to-extract oil and gas," says <a href="http://shortsidetrader.investorplace.com/password/index.php?plocation=%2F">Michael Shulman</a>.</p>
<p>The editor of <a href="http://shortsidetrader.investorplace.com/password/index.php?plocation=%2F">The Short-Side Trader</a> suggests, "Let's ask ourselves the following question: Over the next year is the there going to be more, less or an equal demand for oil? The answer is clearly more demand.</p>
<p>"Another question: Over the next year is there going to be more, less or an equal supply of oil?</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/31/schlumberger-slb-a-great-opportunity/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Schlumberger (SLB): A 'Great Opportunity'</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/31/schlumberger-slb-a-great-opportunity/">Schlumberger (SLB): A 'Great Opportunity'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 31 Mar 2011 12:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/31/schlumberger-slb-a-great-opportunity/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19897745/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/31/schlumberger-slb-a-great-opportunity/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>energy stocks</category><category>featured</category><category>michael shulman</category><category>oil drilling</category><category>oil services</category><category>oil stocks</category><category>short-side trader</category><category>StevenHalpern</category><category>thestockadvisors.com</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Halpern]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 12:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Deadbeat Stock #6: Amgen (AMGN)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/21/deadbeat-stock-6-amgen-amgn/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/21/deadbeat-stock-6-amgen-amgn/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/21/deadbeat-stock-6-amgen-amgn/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amgn/" rel="tag">Amgen Inc (AMGN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-sell/" rel="tag">Stocks to Sell</a></p><p><img hspace="4" height="213" border="0" align="right" width="160" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/03/amgen.jpg" alt="Deadbeat stock #6 -- Amgen (AMGN)" />A lot of investors think <strong>Amgen </strong>(<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/amgen-inc/amgn/nas">AMGN</a>)<strong> </strong>is a great next-generation biotech company. Wrong. Amgen was a decent last-generation biotech company.</p>
<p>It's terribly managed outfit living on EPO drugs for dialysis and oncology patients. True, it has a billion dollar (actually more) drug, Neupogen, but it could be subject to generic competition in the United States from TEVA within two years.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/21/deadbeat-stock-6-amgen-amgn/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Deadbeat Stock #6: Amgen (AMGN)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/21/deadbeat-stock-6-amgen-amgn/">Deadbeat Stock #6: Amgen (AMGN)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 21 Mar 2010 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/21/deadbeat-stock-6-amgen-amgn/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19406545/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/21/deadbeat-stock-6-amgen-amgn/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Amgen</category><category>AMGN</category><category>Michael Shulman</category><category>pharma stocks</category><category>stocks to sell</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Shulman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Deadbeat Stock #5: Merck (MRK)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/21/deadbeat-stock-5-merck-mrk/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/21/deadbeat-stock-5-merck-mrk/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/21/deadbeat-stock-5-merck-mrk/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mrk/" rel="tag">Merck and Co (MRK)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-sell/" rel="tag">Stocks to Sell</a></p><p><img hspace="4" height="213" border="0" align="right" width="160" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/03/merck.jpg" alt="Deadbeat stock #5 -- Merck (MRK)" />This declining company lost patent protection for its statin, Zocor. It has replaced some of these sales with three new drugs, but, in reality, they cannot make up for the lost revenue from Zocor.</p>
<p><strong>Merck</strong>'s<strong> </strong>(<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/merck-and-co-inc-new/mrk/nys">MRK</a>) revenues are stagnant and the company has a very weak pipeline. Even if health care reform adds more patients, it will also bring increased pressure to cut prices.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/21/deadbeat-stock-5-merck-mrk/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Deadbeat Stock #5: Merck (MRK)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/21/deadbeat-stock-5-merck-mrk/">Deadbeat Stock #5: Merck (MRK)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 21 Mar 2010 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/21/deadbeat-stock-5-merck-mrk/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19406551/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/21/deadbeat-stock-5-merck-mrk/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Merck</category><category>Michael Shulman</category><category>MRK</category><category>pharma stocks</category><category>stocks to sell</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Shulman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Deadbeat Stock #4: Pfizer (PFE)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/21/deadbeat-stock-4-pfizer-pfe/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/21/deadbeat-stock-4-pfizer-pfe/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/21/deadbeat-stock-4-pfizer-pfe/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pfe/" rel="tag">Pfizer (PFE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-sell/" rel="tag">Stocks to Sell</a></p><p><strong><img hspace="4" height="213" border="0" align="right" width="160" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/03/pfizer.jpg" alt="Deadbeat stock #4 -- Pfizer (PFE)" />Pfizer </strong>(<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/pfizer-inc/pfe/nys">PFE</a>) was the darling of the 1990s. Well, so was Bill Clinton, and like Clinton, the company pops up now and again in the news, but none of it really matters.</p>
<p>Pfizer's premier product, Lipitor, comes off patent this year and will get hit by generic competition in 2011. This drug has $11 billion in sales, which will shrink to $4 billion or less, and with that could go $5 billion or so in profits.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/21/deadbeat-stock-4-pfizer-pfe/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Deadbeat Stock #4: Pfizer (PFE)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/21/deadbeat-stock-4-pfizer-pfe/">Deadbeat Stock #4: Pfizer (PFE)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 21 Mar 2010 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/21/deadbeat-stock-4-pfizer-pfe/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19406555/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/21/deadbeat-stock-4-pfizer-pfe/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Michael Shulman</category><category>PFE</category><category>Pfizer</category><category>pharma stocks</category><category>stocks to sell</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Shulman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Deadbeat Stock #3: Brunswick (BC)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/20/deadbeat-stock-3-brunswick-corp-bc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/20/deadbeat-stock-3-brunswick-corp-bc/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/20/deadbeat-stock-3-brunswick-corp-bc/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-sell/" rel="tag">Stocks to Sell</a></p><p><img hspace="4" height="213" border="0" align="right" width="160" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/03/brunswick.jpg" alt="Deadbeat stock #3 -- Brunswick Corp. (BC)" />A well-managed company that may be worth buying someday, currently <strong>Brunswick's </strong>(<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/brunswick-corporation/bc/nys">BC</a>) profits rely too heavily on making and selling boats.</p>
<p>Who needs a boat? You may want one, but you certainly don't need one. And when you find the cash (since there's no credit available) to buy one, you can get a used one; they are falling off the dry docks.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/20/deadbeat-stock-3-brunswick-corp-bc/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Deadbeat Stock #3: Brunswick (BC)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/20/deadbeat-stock-3-brunswick-corp-bc/">Deadbeat Stock #3: Brunswick (BC)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 20 Mar 2010 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/20/deadbeat-stock-3-brunswick-corp-bc/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19406559/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/20/deadbeat-stock-3-brunswick-corp-bc/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BC</category><category>Brunswick Corp.</category><category>Michael Shulman</category><category>stocks to sell</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Shulman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Deadbeat Stock #2: Palm (PALM)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/20/deadbeat-stock-2-palm-palm/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/20/deadbeat-stock-2-palm-palm/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/20/deadbeat-stock-2-palm-palm/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/palm/" rel="tag">Palm Inc (PALM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-sell/" rel="tag">Stocks to Sell</a></p><p><img hspace="4" height="213" border="0" align="right" width="160" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/03/palm.jpg" alt="Deadbeat stock #2 -- Palm (PALM)" />Would anyone care if <strong>Palm </strong>(<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/palm-inc-new/palm/nas">PALM</a>) went away -- other than its employees and shareholders?</p>
<p>This company is seeing sales decline, and its new best hope, the Pre, is competing against the iPhone, BlackBerry and Droid.</p>
<p>That means a company with little cash and a market cap under a  billion dollars is fighting, with an inferior and overpriced product,  against the combined strength of Apple (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>),  Research In Motion (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/research-in-motion-limited/rimm/nas">RIMM</a>)  and Google (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>).  End of discussion.</p>
<p><em>At the time of this writing, the author  did not own shares of PALM.</em></p>
<p><strong>Next: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/20/deadbeat-stock-3-brunswick-corp-bc/">Deadbeat  Stock #3: Brunswick (BC)</a></strong></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/20/deadbeat-stock-2-palm-palm/">Deadbeat Stock #2: Palm (PALM)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 20 Mar 2010 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/20/deadbeat-stock-2-palm-palm/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19406565/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/20/deadbeat-stock-2-palm-palm/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Michael Shulman</category><category>PALM</category><category>stocks to sell</category><category>tech stocks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Shulman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Deadbeat Stock #1: Harley-Davidson (HOG)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/20/deadbeat-stock-1-harley-davidson-hog/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/20/deadbeat-stock-1-harley-davidson-hog/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/20/deadbeat-stock-1-harley-davidson-hog/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hog/" rel="tag">Harley-Davidson (HOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-sell/" rel="tag">Stocks to Sell</a></p><p><strong><img hspace="4" height="213" border="0" align="right" width="160" vspace="4" alt="Deadbeat stock #1 -- Harley-Davidson (HOG)" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/03/harley.jpg" />Harley-Davidson </strong>(<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/harley-davidson-inc/hog/nys">HOG</a>) shot up recently on <a target="_blank" href="http://www.optionszone.com/market-commentary/options-activity/2010/03/harley-davidson-hog-options-active-on-buyout-rumors.html?cp=bloggingstocks&amp;cc=synd&amp;cs=optionszone">takeover rumors</a>, but in my opinion, they're just that -- rumors.</p>
<p>Who needs a high-end motorcycle during the Great Recession? Or its aftermath? And who needs the stock of a company with more than $4 billion in long-term debt, huge unpaid pension obligations, lousy cash flow to service its debt, and that is still in search of a partner to take customer loans off its hands.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/20/deadbeat-stock-1-harley-davidson-hog/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Deadbeat Stock #1: Harley-Davidson (HOG)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/20/deadbeat-stock-1-harley-davidson-hog/">Deadbeat Stock #1: Harley-Davidson (HOG)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 20 Mar 2010 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/20/deadbeat-stock-1-harley-davidson-hog/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19406569/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/20/deadbeat-stock-1-harley-davidson-hog/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Harley-Davidson</category><category>HOG</category><category>Michael Shulman</category><category>stocks to sell</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Shulman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Six Deadbeat Stocks to Clean Out of Your Portfolio]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/20/6-deadbeat-stocks-to-clean-out-of-your-portfolio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/20/6-deadbeat-stocks-to-clean-out-of-your-portfolio/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/20/6-deadbeat-stocks-to-clean-out-of-your-portfolio/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pfe/" rel="tag">Pfizer (PFE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mrk/" rel="tag">Merck and Co (MRK)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/palm/" rel="tag">Palm Inc (PALM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amgn/" rel="tag">Amgen Inc (AMGN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hog/" rel="tag">Harley-Davidson (HOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-sell/" rel="tag">Stocks to Sell</a></p><p><img hspace="4" height="213" border="0" align="right" width="160" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/03/dollar_bills.jpg" alt="6 deadbeat stocks to clean out of your portfolio" />Spring is finally here, which means it's time to break out the broom and dustpan for some spring cleaning.</p>
<p>But your home isn't the only thing that requires constant maintenance -- your portfolio does too.</p>
<p>And what better time than spring to get a fresh start by cleaning out the stocks that are sitting around collecting dust rather than making you money?</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/20/6-deadbeat-stocks-to-clean-out-of-your-portfolio/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Six Deadbeat Stocks to Clean Out of Your Portfolio</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/20/6-deadbeat-stocks-to-clean-out-of-your-portfolio/">Six Deadbeat Stocks to Clean Out of Your Portfolio</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 20 Mar 2010 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/20/6-deadbeat-stocks-to-clean-out-of-your-portfolio/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19406574/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/20/6-deadbeat-stocks-to-clean-out-of-your-portfolio/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Amgen</category><category>AMGN</category><category>BC</category><category>Brunswick Corp.</category><category>featured</category><category>Harley-Davidson</category><category>HOG</category><category>Merck</category><category>Michael Shulman</category><category>MRK</category><category>PALM</category><category>PFE</category><category>Pfizer</category><category>pharma stocks</category><category>stocks to sell</category><category>tech stocks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Shulman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reason #5 to Short the U.S.: The Market Is Overvalued]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/31/reason-5-to-short-the-u-s-the-market-is-overvalued/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/31/reason-5-to-short-the-u-s-the-market-is-overvalued/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/31/reason-5-to-short-the-u-s-the-market-is-overvalued/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a></p><p><img hspace="4" height="213" width="160" vspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/down-chart.jpg" alt="Reason #5 to short the U.S. -- The market is overvalued" />The market is wildly overvalued given the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.optionszone.com/trading-ideas/gallery/recession-in-2010.html?cp=bloggingstocks&amp;cc=synd&amp;cs=optionszone">trajectory of the economy</a> and is being driven by traders.</p>
<p>The trade of the day continues to be dollar/commodities/China, but more and more, individual stocks are being rewarded or whacked based on fundamentals, a good thing for stock pickers, but a bad thing for the vast majority of money managers who know little more than the movement of the indices.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/31/reason-5-to-short-the-u-s-the-market-is-overvalued/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Reason #5 to Short the U.S.: The Market Is Overvalued</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/31/reason-5-to-short-the-u-s-the-market-is-overvalued/">Reason #5 to Short the U.S.: The Market Is Overvalued</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 31 Jan 2010 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/31/reason-5-to-short-the-u-s-the-market-is-overvalued/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19338071/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/31/reason-5-to-short-the-u-s-the-market-is-overvalued/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>michael shulman</category><category>shorting the u.s.</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Shulman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reason #4 to Short the U.S.: The Banks]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/31/reason-4-to-short-the-u-s-the-banks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/31/reason-4-to-short-the-u-s-the-banks/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/31/reason-4-to-short-the-u-s-the-banks/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ms/" rel="tag">Morgan Stanley (MS)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" height="213" width="160" vspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="Reason #4 to short the U.S. -- The banks" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/american-bank.jpg" />Banks are the kink between the financial markets and the Main Street economy. They are also the lubricant -- when they are lending -- of a growing economy.</p>
<p>Using time-honored but now discarded accounting standards, U.S. banks, as a group, are insolvent. They are hoarding cash because deep in the recesses of little offices, they know they will be exposed as insolvent if they have to dump toxic assets on the market. They are also looking at reduced activity due to the economy and new taxes and regulations, and therefore lower profits. And when the Fed raises interest rates, their spreads will contract, also hitting profits.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/31/reason-4-to-short-the-u-s-the-banks/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Reason #4 to Short the U.S.: The Banks</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/31/reason-4-to-short-the-u-s-the-banks/">Reason #4 to Short the U.S.: The Banks</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 31 Jan 2010 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/31/reason-4-to-short-the-u-s-the-banks/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19338076/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/31/reason-4-to-short-the-u-s-the-banks/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Financial Select Sector SPDR</category><category>Goldman Sachs</category><category>GS</category><category>Michael Shulman</category><category>Morgan Stanley</category><category>MS</category><category>shorting the u.s.</category><category>XLF</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Shulman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reason #3 to Short the U.S.: The 'New Frugal']]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/31/reason-3-to-short-the-u-s-the-new-frugal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/31/reason-3-to-short-the-u-s-the-new-frugal/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/31/reason-3-to-short-the-u-s-the-new-frugal/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a></p><p><img hspace="4" height="213" width="160" vspace="4" border="0" align="right" new="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/money-squeeze.jpg" alt="Reason #3 to short the U.S. -- The " />With reduced national income due to unemployment, reduced spending power due to tightened credit, reduced wealth due to falling home and stock market values and reduced confidence due to all of the above, we are seeing consumers take on new attitudes toward spending.</p>
<p>This "New Frugal" will not be a fad that passes quickly. U.S. consumers will continue to keep their purse strings tightened.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/31/reason-3-to-short-the-u-s-the-new-frugal/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Reason #3 to Short the U.S.: The 'New Frugal'</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/31/reason-3-to-short-the-u-s-the-new-frugal/">Reason #3 to Short the U.S.: The 'New Frugal'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 31 Jan 2010 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/31/reason-3-to-short-the-u-s-the-new-frugal/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19338080/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/31/reason-3-to-short-the-u-s-the-new-frugal/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>allbut</category><category>M</category><category>Macys</category><category>michael shulman</category><category>new frugal</category><category>Saks</category><category>shorting the u.s.</category><category>SKS</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Shulman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reason #2 to Short the U.S.: The Housing Market Isn't Recovering]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/30/reason-2-to-short-the-u-s-the-housing-market-isnt-recoveri/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/30/reason-2-to-short-the-u-s-the-housing-market-isnt-recoveri/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/30/reason-2-to-short-the-u-s-the-housing-market-isnt-recoveri/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a></p><p><img hspace="4" height="213" width="160" vspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="Reason #2 to short the U.S. -- The housing market isn't recovering" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/foreclosed.jpg" />The optimism on Wall Street about housing is surreal given all the public data on housing values, mortgage defaults, foreclosures and new home starts.</p>
<p>Housing prices are going to fall nationally for another couple of years as foreclosures hit 6-7 million in the next 30 months, and the 600,00 to 800,000 homes foreclosed but not yet listed are added to housing inventory. The headwinds created by this will last until foreclosures peak and those homes hit the market in late 2011 to mid-2012. Foreclosures will not hit historical norms until a year or two from that peak.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/30/reason-2-to-short-the-u-s-the-housing-market-isnt-recoveri/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Reason #2 to Short the U.S.: The Housing Market Isn't Recovering</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/30/reason-2-to-short-the-u-s-the-housing-market-isnt-recoveri/">Reason #2 to Short the U.S.: The Housing Market Isn't Recovering</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 30 Jan 2010 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/30/reason-2-to-short-the-u-s-the-housing-market-isnt-recoveri/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19338083/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/30/reason-2-to-short-the-u-s-the-housing-market-isnt-recoveri/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>homebuilder etfs</category><category>michael shulman</category><category>shorting the u.s.</category><category>SPDR SP Homebuilders</category><category>XHB</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Shulman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reason #1 to Short the U.S.: Public Debt]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/30/reason-1-to-short-the-u-s-public-debt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/30/reason-1-to-short-the-u-s-public-debt/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/30/reason-1-to-short-the-u-s-public-debt/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ETF-Investing/" rel="tag">ETF Investing</a></p><p><img hspace="4" height="213" width="160" vspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/uncle-sam-broke.jpg" alt="Reason #1 to short the U.S. -- Public debt" />Large and rapidly growing deficits and public debt at the federal and state level will eventually lead to a rise in interest rates and to the crowding out of other spending as governments service debt. This will likely start near the end of this year or early in 2011.</p>
<p>And please don't blame the Democrats, the party of fiscal rectitude. The Republicans doubled the debt while they controlled the White House and Congress, financing a war off balance sheet, led by a cheerleader in chief who told people to go shopping rather than tighten their belts after 9/11. And historically, red-staters spend more on their key constituents than the Dems, so if they grab power, nothing will change.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/30/reason-1-to-short-the-u-s-public-debt/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Reason #1 to Short the U.S.: Public Debt</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/30/reason-1-to-short-the-u-s-public-debt/">Reason #1 to Short the U.S.: Public Debt</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 30 Jan 2010 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/30/reason-1-to-short-the-u-s-public-debt/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19338087/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/30/reason-1-to-short-the-u-s-public-debt/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>michael shulman</category><category>ProShares UltraShort Lehman 20  Year Treasury</category><category>shorting the u.s.</category><category>tbt</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Shulman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Five Reasons to Short the U.S.]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/30/5-reasons-to-short-the-u-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/30/5-reasons-to-short-the-u-s/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/30/5-reasons-to-short-the-u-s/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ms/" rel="tag">Morgan Stanley (MS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ETF-Investing/" rel="tag">ETF Investing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a></p><p><img hspace="4" height="213" width="160" vspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="5 reasons to short the U.S." src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/american-dollar.jpg" />I love my country: the chaos, the hurly-burly of democracy, the hard work of quiet people and the great, big heart as shown by our private donations to Haiti at a time of near 20% unemployment and underemployment. We forgive wayward politicians and athletes, let our children make more decisions than virtually any people on Earth and we stand for something -- a true city on a hill. But right now, that city is in political chaos ... and pretty broke.</p>
<p>Although, I don't like to say it, it is time to short the United States.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/30/5-reasons-to-short-the-u-s/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Five Reasons to Short the U.S.</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/30/5-reasons-to-short-the-u-s/">Five Reasons to Short the U.S.</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 30 Jan 2010 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/30/5-reasons-to-short-the-u-s/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19338095/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/30/5-reasons-to-short-the-u-s/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>Financial Select Sector SPDR</category><category>Goldman sachs</category><category>gs</category><category>m</category><category>macys</category><category>michael shulman</category><category>morgan stanely</category><category>ms</category><category>new frugal</category><category>ProShares UltraShort Lehman 20  Year Treasury</category><category>saks</category><category>shorting the u.s.</category><category>sks</category><category>SPDR SP Homebuilders</category><category>xhb</category><category>xlf</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Shulman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Lie #11: The Palm Pre Is the Ultimate iPhone Killer]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/27/lie-11-the-palm-pre-is-the-ultimate-iphone-killer/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/27/lie-11-the-palm-pre-is-the-ultimate-iphone-killer/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/27/lie-11-the-palm-pre-is-the-ultimate-iphone-killer/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/palm/" rel="tag">Palm Inc (PALM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/smartphones/" rel="tag">Smartphones</a></p><p><img border="0" hspace="4" alt="Lie #11 -- The Palm Pre is the ultimate iPhone killer" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/palmpre.jpg" width="160" height="213" />This little gem was perpetuated by tech guru and investor Roger McNamee. Of course, he is a member of the Palm (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/palm-inc-new/palm/nas">PALM</a>) board of directors, and his firm is an investor in the company. </p>
<p>Did I mention that PALM shot up after his comment, before the mediocre and overpriced Pre hit the market? The company then issued shares a few days later? You and I would go to jail for doing this.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/27/lie-11-the-palm-pre-is-the-ultimate-iphone-killer/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Lie #11: The Palm Pre Is the Ultimate iPhone Killer</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/27/lie-11-the-palm-pre-is-the-ultimate-iphone-killer/">Lie #11: The Palm Pre Is the Ultimate iPhone Killer</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 27 Dec 2009 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/27/lie-11-the-palm-pre-is-the-ultimate-iphone-killer/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19292229/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/27/lie-11-the-palm-pre-is-the-ultimate-iphone-killer/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>Apple iPhone</category><category>Michael Shulman</category><category>PALM</category><category>Palm Pre</category><category>Roger McNamee</category><category>smart phone stock</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Shulman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Lie #10: China Experienced Double-Digit Growth in 2009]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/27/lie-10-china-experienced-double-digit-growth-in-2009/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/27/lie-10-china-experienced-double-digit-growth-in-2009/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/27/lie-10-china-experienced-double-digit-growth-in-2009/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a></p><p><img border="0" hspace="4" alt="Lie #10 -- China experienced double-digit growth in 2009" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/chinaflag.jpg" width="160" height="213" />If you think China saw double-digit growth this year, you may also believe swine flu is spread via flying pigs. </p>
<p>The London-based Lombard Group, using energy data from the International Energy Agency -- which we can assume is a bit more accurate than the nonsense printed by the Chinese government -- shows GDP growth may have been just 2% in the first quarter rather than the reported 6.1%. And even that growth is being held up by government stimulus and state banks lending money to anyone and everyone to build capacity no one needs or to invest in Chinese equities no one can fairly value since Chinese accounting is as good as Chinese government data. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/27/lie-10-china-experienced-double-digit-growth-in-2009/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Lie #10: China Experienced Double-Digit Growth in 2009</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/27/lie-10-china-experienced-double-digit-growth-in-2009/">Lie #10: China Experienced Double-Digit Growth in 2009</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 27 Dec 2009 16:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/27/lie-10-china-experienced-double-digit-growth-in-2009/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19292239/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/27/lie-10-china-experienced-double-digit-growth-in-2009/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>China</category><category>GDP growth</category><category>International Energy Agency</category><category>Lombard Group</category><category>Michael Shulman</category><category>wall street lies</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Shulman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 16:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Lie #9: The U.S. Dollar Is Dead]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/27/lie-9-the-u-s-dollar-is-dead/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/27/lie-9-the-u-s-dollar-is-dead/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/27/lie-9-the-u-s-dollar-is-dead/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img border="0" hspace="4" alt="Lie #9 -- The U.S. dollar is dead" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/cumpleddollar.jpg" width="160" height="213" />Monetary neurotics, led by the polite, appealing and economically brain-damaged Ron Paul, believe the U.S. dollar is dead because of our growing debt and the Fed running the printing presses, which must lead to inflation, which, in turn, will kill the dollar. Recent falls in the dollar seem to confirm this, uh, shibboleth (look it up again) of the monetary right. </p>
<p>In actuality, though, the dollar is no weaker than it was a few years ago. And it is the only currency in the world for the foreseeable -- and I mean long-term foreseeable -- future that can serve as a reserve currency due not just to our economic and political power, but our political system. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/27/lie-9-the-u-s-dollar-is-dead/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Lie #9: The U.S. Dollar Is Dead</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/27/lie-9-the-u-s-dollar-is-dead/">Lie #9: The U.S. Dollar Is Dead</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 27 Dec 2009 14:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/27/lie-9-the-u-s-dollar-is-dead/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19292244/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/27/lie-9-the-u-s-dollar-is-dead/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Michael Shulman</category><category>reserve currency</category><category>Ron Paul</category><category>U.S. dollar</category><category>wall street lies</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Shulman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 14:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Lie #8: The Fed Only Buys AAA-Rated Bonds and Securities]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/27/lie-8-the-fed-only-buys-aaa-rated-bonds-and-securities/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/27/lie-8-the-fed-only-buys-aaa-rated-bonds-and-securities/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/27/lie-8-the-fed-only-buys-aaa-rated-bonds-and-securities/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hog/" rel="tag">Harley-Davidson (HOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a></p><p><img border="0" hspace="4" alt="Lie #8 -- The Fed only buys AAA-rated bonds and securities" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/certificate.jpg" width="160" height="213" />This is a cornerstone of the Fed, a true shibboleth (Google that one). But one of the first set of bonds the Fed bought under the TALF program were bonds backed by motorcycle loans made by Harley-Davidson (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/harley-davidson-inc/hog/nys">HOG</a>) to its customers.</p>
<p>The Fed program was designed to provide loans and capital to businesses that were shut out of frozen credit markets, which is a good thing. But loans to Harley made to boost the sale of motorcycles to people who could not get loans elsewhere? </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/27/lie-8-the-fed-only-buys-aaa-rated-bonds-and-securities/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Lie #8: The Fed Only Buys AAA-Rated Bonds and Securities</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/27/lie-8-the-fed-only-buys-aaa-rated-bonds-and-securities/">Lie #8: The Fed Only Buys AAA-Rated Bonds and Securities</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 27 Dec 2009 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/27/lie-8-the-fed-only-buys-aaa-rated-bonds-and-securities/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19292249/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/27/lie-8-the-fed-only-buys-aaa-rated-bonds-and-securities/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bernanke</category><category>fed</category><category>Harley-Davidson</category><category>HOG</category><category>Michael Shulman</category><category>TALF</category><category>wall street lies</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Shulman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Lie #7: Consumer Spending Is Returning to Normal]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/27/lie-7-consumer-spending-is-returning-to-normal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/27/lie-7-consumer-spending-is-returning-to-normal/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/27/lie-7-consumer-spending-is-returning-to-normal/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/black-friday/" rel="tag">Black Friday</a></p><p><img border="0" hspace="4" alt="Lie #7 -- Consumer spending is returning to normal" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/shoppingbags.jpg" width="160" height="213" />With 70% of the GDP driven by consumer spending, Wall Street wants to believe this lie so badly that it has convinced itself it's true. Even worse-than-expected Black Friday sales haven't forced the Street to give up this inane hope.</p>
<p>Real consumer wealth is down more than 40% in the past two years; credit is contracting and unemployment is rising. That is not exactly the recipe for increased consumer spending.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/27/lie-7-consumer-spending-is-returning-to-normal/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Lie #7: Consumer Spending Is Returning to Normal</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/27/lie-7-consumer-spending-is-returning-to-normal/">Lie #7: Consumer Spending Is Returning to Normal</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 27 Dec 2009 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/27/lie-7-consumer-spending-is-returning-to-normal/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19292259/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/27/lie-7-consumer-spending-is-returning-to-normal/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Black Friday</category><category>consumer spending</category><category>michael shulman</category><category>wall street lies</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Shulman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Lie #6: The Credit Crunch Is Easing]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/27/lie-6-the-credit-crunch-is-easing/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/27/lie-6-the-credit-crunch-is-easing/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/27/lie-6-the-credit-crunch-is-easing/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img border="0" hspace="4" alt="Lie #6 -- The credit crunch is easing" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/debtweight.jpg" width="160" height="213" />The headline consensus on Wall Street is that the banks are stable and no markets are melting down. In short, things are returning to normal.</p>
<p>But we've seen a $1.5 trillion reduction in consumer credit during the past 18 months, and another $1 trillion (at least) is likely to be pulled back in the coming year, according to uber-analyst Meredith Whitney -- someone I wouldn't bet against. And almost no one is getting a home equity line.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/27/lie-6-the-credit-crunch-is-easing/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Lie #6: The Credit Crunch Is Easing</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/27/lie-6-the-credit-crunch-is-easing/">Lie #6: The Credit Crunch Is Easing</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 27 Dec 2009 08:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/27/lie-6-the-credit-crunch-is-easing/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19292265/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/27/lie-6-the-credit-crunch-is-easing/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>credit crunch</category><category>Meredith Whitney</category><category>Michael Shulman</category><category>wall street lies</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Shulman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 08:00:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
