<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Tell-Tale Stat: Fed Paid $78.4 Billion to U.S. Treasury in 2010]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/21/tell-tale-stat-fed-paid-78-4-billion-to-u-s-treasury-in-2010/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/21/tell-tale-stat-fed-paid-78-4-billion-to-u-s-treasury-in-2010/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/21/tell-tale-stat-fed-paid-78-4-billion-to-u-s-treasury-in-2010/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/100dollar.jpg" alt="" />One economic data point that sort of slipped under the radar recently concerned the U.S. Federal Reserve's <a href="http:// http://federalreserve.gov/newsevents/press/other/20110110a.htm">$78.4 billion payment</a> to the U.S. Treasury in 2010, up about 65% from $47.4 billion in 2009.</p>
<p>And the reason for the revenue surge? Experienced investors or others who have reviewed <a href="http:// http://federalreserve.gov/newsevents/press/other/20110110a.htm">the Fed's report</a> will realize that much of it stems from income from the Fed's purchase of mortgage securities and Treasury securities in connection with the quantitative easing, part 2 program, or QE2. </p>
<p>Under QE2, the Fed will purchase up to $600 billion in assets from November 2010 to June 2011 -- this coming after the Fed purchased $1.7 trillion in assets through March 2010.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/21/tell-tale-stat-fed-paid-78-4-billion-to-u-s-treasury-in-2010/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Tell-Tale Stat: Fed Paid $78.4 Billion to U.S. Treasury in 2010</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/21/tell-tale-stat-fed-paid-78-4-billion-to-u-s-treasury-in-2010/">Tell-Tale Stat: Fed Paid $78.4 Billion to U.S. Treasury in 2010</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 21 Jan 2011 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/21/tell-tale-stat-fed-paid-78-4-billion-to-u-s-treasury-in-2010/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19810493/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/01/21/tell-tale-stat-fed-paid-78-4-billion-to-u-s-treasury-in-2010/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bernanke</category><category>featured</category><category>Federal Reserve</category><category>inthenews</category><category>monetary policy</category><category>QE2</category><category>quantitative easing</category><category>US Treasury</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Martin Wolf: To Cut Debt We Must Borrow More]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/29/martin-wolf-to-cut-debt-we-must-borrow-more/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/29/martin-wolf-to-cut-debt-we-must-borrow-more/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/29/martin-wolf-to-cut-debt-we-must-borrow-more/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="money" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/04/1-money.jpg" /><em>Financial Times</em> columnist and economist <a href="http://blogs.ft.com/martin-wolf-exchange/2010/09/26/we-can-only-cut-debt-by-borrowing/">Martin Wolf</a> forwards the paradoxical, but nevertheless economically valid theory that "we can only cut debt by borrowing more."</p>
<p>Economic conservatives, including supply-side economics advocates and Tea Party backers, will no-doubt look aghast at the above, but investors should keep in mind that most of the conservative camp has shown concern primarily for: 1) cutting taxes and 2) cutting government spending -- not for the plight of the more than 15 million Americans without work. Now, if in the process of cutting taxes and spending U.S. unemployment goes to 15% or 20% -- which would likely be the consequence of spending cuts that reduce already low aggregate demand further -- so be it. In other words, if the free market says unemployment should be that high, then unemployment will rise. Just cut taxes and cut spending.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/29/martin-wolf-to-cut-debt-we-must-borrow-more/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Martin Wolf: To Cut Debt We Must Borrow More</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/29/martin-wolf-to-cut-debt-we-must-borrow-more/">Martin Wolf: To Cut Debt We Must Borrow More</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 29 Sep 2010 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/29/martin-wolf-to-cut-debt-we-must-borrow-more/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19652231/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/29/martin-wolf-to-cut-debt-we-must-borrow-more/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>debt</category><category>featured</category><category>fiscal policy</category><category>GDP</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Martin Wolf</category><category>monetary policy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Fed Decision: Not the Time to Take Chances!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/23/the-fed-decision-not-the-time-to-take-chances/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/23/the-fed-decision-not-the-time-to-take-chances/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/23/the-fed-decision-not-the-time-to-take-chances/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sec-filings/" rel="tag">SEC Filings</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/fedres-logo.jpg" />The Federal Reserve Open Market Committee (FOMC) issued its statement indicating again that interest rates will remain low for an extended period of time. Thomas Hoenig dissented against the FOMC statement and wants a much tighter monetary policy. He still remains the only voice against the statement but is said to favor a change in language, not an immediate rise in interest rates.</p>
<p>The FOMC mentioned continued economic improvement but indicated that it was a mixed picture with high unemployment and depressed housing. With unemployment expected to remain elevated for the foreseeable future and little inflationary pressure from the CPI thus far, it is in no rush to tighten.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/23/the-fed-decision-not-the-time-to-take-chances/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The Fed Decision: Not the Time to Take Chances!</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/23/the-fed-decision-not-the-time-to-take-chances/">The Fed Decision: Not the Time to Take Chances!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 23 Jun 2010 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/23/the-fed-decision-not-the-time-to-take-chances/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19528395/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/23/the-fed-decision-not-the-time-to-take-chances/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>federal reserve</category><category>fomc</category><category>inthenews</category><category>monetary policy</category><category>thomas hoenig</category><category>ThomasHoenig</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas S. Roberts]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ray of Light: China Quickly Returns to Robust GDP Growth]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/21/ray-of-light-china-quickly-returns-to-robust-gdp-growth/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/21/ray-of-light-china-quickly-returns-to-robust-gdp-growth/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/21/ray-of-light-china-quickly-returns-to-robust-gdp-growth/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/08/chineseflag.jpg" alt="" />A good news data point for investors: China's economy grew at a 10.7% rate in Q4 -- a pace that pushed 2009 GDP to an impressive 8.7% pace, China's Xinhua News Agency <a href="http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/business/2010-01/21/c_13145167.htm">reported Thursday,</a> citing National Bureau of Statistics data.<br /> <br /> "The accelerating GDP growth in the fourth quarter was due to a low basis of the same period in 2008, when the quarterly GDP expanded 6.8% from a year earlier, also indicating that the country's economy is on a strong rebound," said Zhuang Jian, senior economist for the Asian Development Bank, <a href="http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/business/2010-01/21/c_13145167.htm">Xinhua reported. <br /> </a><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/21/ray-of-light-china-quickly-returns-to-robust-gdp-growth/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ray of Light: China Quickly Returns to Robust GDP Growth</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/21/ray-of-light-china-quickly-returns-to-robust-gdp-growth/">Ray of Light: China Quickly Returns to Robust GDP Growth</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 21 Jan 2010 16:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/21/ray-of-light-china-quickly-returns-to-robust-gdp-growth/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19326475/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/21/ray-of-light-china-quickly-returns-to-robust-gdp-growth/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>china</category><category>monetary policy</category><category>MonetaryPolicy</category><category>stimulus</category><category>world growth</category><category>WorldGrowth</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 16:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Inflation Surges on Wealth Destruction in North Korea]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/07/inflation-surges-on-wealth-destruction-in-north-korea/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/07/inflation-surges-on-wealth-destruction-in-north-korea/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/07/inflation-surges-on-wealth-destruction-in-north-korea/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/currency/" rel="tag">Currency</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/nk-banknote.jpg" />Even though the regime has loosened some of the restrictions on currency exchange, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34743025/ns/world_news-washington_post/">inflation is still skyrocketing in North Korea</a>. The government recently announced that it was moving to a new <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/currency/">currency</a>, and that the swap would involve a limit on how much could be traded. As a result, personal wealth was being consciously constrained, which led to the open questioning of the regime, defiance and rioting in some cases, and even a rare instance of flexibility among Kim Jong Il's subordinate decision makers.</p>
<p>Reports from inside the isolated communist state suggest that food shortages and price inflation have resulted from the new monetary policy, exacerbating a difficult situation with which the country already had to cope.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/07/inflation-surges-on-wealth-destruction-in-north-korea/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Inflation Surges on Wealth Destruction in North Korea</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/07/inflation-surges-on-wealth-destruction-in-north-korea/">Inflation Surges on Wealth Destruction in North Korea</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 07 Jan 2010 12:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/07/inflation-surges-on-wealth-destruction-in-north-korea/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19306757/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/07/inflation-surges-on-wealth-destruction-in-north-korea/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>communism</category><category>communist bloc</category><category>communist party</category><category>Communists</category><category>currency</category><category>currency exchange</category><category>currency markets</category><category>currency rates</category><category>dprk</category><category>inthenews</category><category>kim jong il</category><category>monetary</category><category>monetary policy</category><category>north korea</category><category>north korea uncovered</category><category>north korean</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 12:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[New North Korean monetary policy leaves two dead, markets in uproar]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/09/new-north-korean-monetary-policy-leaves-two-dead-markets-in-upr/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/09/new-north-korean-monetary-policy-leaves-two-dead-markets-in-upr/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/09/new-north-korean-monetary-policy-leaves-two-dead-markets-in-upr/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/russia/" rel="tag">Russia</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/north-korea-flag.jpg" alt="" />The timing couldn't have been worse. Just as a U.S. envoy arrived in <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/NorthKorea/">North Korea</a> to meet with the reclusive regime's officials, <a target="_blank" href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB126029137357982133.html">protests and violence are reported to have erupted</a>. The country is reacting to a new currency issue that is being used to seize most of the citizens' money and savings.</p>
<p>On November 30, 2009, the regime announced that it would issue new currency and cap the amount that could be exchanged at the equivalent of $40. This effectively rendered the money held privately worthless.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/09/new-north-korean-monetary-policy-leaves-two-dead-markets-in-upr/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>New North Korean monetary policy leaves two dead, markets in uproar</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/09/new-north-korean-monetary-policy-leaves-two-dead-markets-in-upr/">New North Korean monetary policy leaves two dead, markets in uproar</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 09 Dec 2009 12:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/09/new-north-korean-monetary-policy-leaves-two-dead-markets-in-upr/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19271109/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/09/new-north-korean-monetary-policy-leaves-two-dead-markets-in-upr/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>capitalism</category><category>communism</category><category>Communists</category><category>dprk</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Kim Il Sung</category><category>kim jong il</category><category>monetary</category><category>monetary policy</category><category>north korea</category><category>Pyongyang</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 12:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Fed decision: almost exactly as expected!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/the-fed-decision-almost-exactly-as-expected/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/the-fed-decision-almost-exactly-as-expected/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/the-fed-decision-almost-exactly-as-expected/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mandftoday/" rel="tag">Money and Finance Today</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/04/fedlogo.jpg" alt="" />The Federal Reserve Open Market Committee (FOMC) issued its statement almost exactly as expected. The language on interest rates is remaining low for an extended period of time remained largely unchanged, and the decision was unanimous.</p>
<p>As I have mentioned earlier, the Fed continues to avoid any potential language which could disrupt the financial markets. Any potentially controversial ideas seem to be reserved for speeches by the Chairman and other government officials.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/the-fed-decision-almost-exactly-as-expected/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The Fed decision: almost exactly as expected!</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/the-fed-decision-almost-exactly-as-expected/">The Fed decision: almost exactly as expected!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 04 Nov 2009 15:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/the-fed-decision-almost-exactly-as-expected/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19223452/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/the-fed-decision-almost-exactly-as-expected/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bernanke</category><category>featured</category><category>federal reserve</category><category>FederalReserve</category><category>monetary policy</category><category>MonetaryPolicy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas S. Roberts]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 15:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Fed's quantitative easing timetable is the big $2 trillion question]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/feds-quantitative-easing-timetable-is-the-big-2-trillion-ques/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/feds-quantitative-easing-timetable-is-the-big-2-trillion-ques/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/feds-quantitative-easing-timetable-is-the-big-2-trillion-ques/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/fedbuidling.jpg" alt="" />MarketWatch Chief Economist <a href="http:// http://www.marketwatch.com/story/fed-must-walk-the-line-when-tightening-2009-10-20">Irwin Kellner</a> sometimes boldly goes where no man has gone before, to cite an old Star Trek phrase, and this week he evaluates the U.S. Federal Reserve's dilemma. <br /><br />And what a dilemma it is: regarding quantitative easing policy, if the Fed withdraws its record cash injections too soon, it could trigger a double-dip recession, Kellner said. Conversely, if the Fed withdraws funds too late, inflation could re-heat. As part of its quantitative easing policy, the <a href="http://federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/bst_recenttrends.htm">Fed's balance sheet</a> has swelled to more than $2 trillion from about $869 billion in 2007.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/feds-quantitative-easing-timetable-is-the-big-2-trillion-ques/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Fed's quantitative easing timetable is the big $2 trillion question</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/feds-quantitative-easing-timetable-is-the-big-2-trillion-ques/">Fed's quantitative easing timetable is the big $2 trillion question</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 20 Oct 2009 16:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/feds-quantitative-easing-timetable-is-the-big-2-trillion-ques/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19202758/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/feds-quantitative-easing-timetable-is-the-big-2-trillion-ques/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bernanke</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Irwin Kellner</category><category>monetary policy</category><category>quantitative easing</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 16:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The case for a weaker dollar]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/04/the-case-for-a-weaker-dollar/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/04/the-case-for-a-weaker-dollar/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/04/the-case-for-a-weaker-dollar/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/09/benjamin-franklin.jpg" />Why would the government want a weak dollar? To get some perspective on the dilemma facing the Fed, let's go back to the Clinton years. During the 1990s, we had a booming economy. That booming economy fostered a strong dollar policy (i.e., strong economy equals a strong dollar).</p>
<p>Now the tables are turned and we are in the worst recession since the 1930s. We are mired in debt and our unemployment keeps rising. The housing market, while improving somewhat, is still in shambles. Banks are short of money to lend, keeping a lid on expansion, and on and on. So then we have the reverse of the 1990s.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/04/the-case-for-a-weaker-dollar/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The case for a weaker dollar</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/04/the-case-for-a-weaker-dollar/">The case for a weaker dollar</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 04 Oct 2009 15:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/04/the-case-for-a-weaker-dollar/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19183538/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/04/the-case-for-a-weaker-dollar/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bill Gross</category><category>inthenews</category><category>monetary policy</category><category>recession</category><category>U.S. dollar</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 15:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Global economy will contract in 2009 for first time since World War II, World Bank says]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/09/global-economy-will-contract-in-2009-for-first-time-since-world/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/09/global-economy-will-contract-in-2009-for-first-time-since-world/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/09/global-economy-will-contract-in-2009-for-first-time-since-world/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/08/globe.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />Investors received yet another indicator Monday that this is not your father's recession. <br /><br />The global economy will likely contract in 2009 for the first time since World War II -- including a decline in trade - - the World Bank announced in its <a href="http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/NEWS/0,,contentMDK:22093316~menuPK:34463~pagePK:34370~piPK:34424~theSitePK:4607,00.html">most recent report. </a><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/09/global-economy-will-contract-in-2009-for-first-time-since-world/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Global economy will contract in 2009 for first time since World War II, World Bank says</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/09/global-economy-will-contract-in-2009-for-first-time-since-world/">Global economy will contract in 2009 for first time since World War II, World Bank says</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 09 Mar 2009 11:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/09/global-economy-will-contract-in-2009-for-first-time-since-world/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1482157/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/09/global-economy-will-contract-in-2009-for-first-time-since-world/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>credit markets</category><category>emerging markets</category><category>featured</category><category>fiscal policy</category><category>FiscalPolicy</category><category>gdp</category><category>global economy</category><category>globalization</category><category>monetary policy</category><category>MonetaryPolicy</category><category>trade</category><category>World Bank</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 11:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Where does the U.S. economy go from here?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/where-does-the-u-s-economy-go-from-here/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/where-does-the-u-s-economy-go-from-here/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/where-does-the-u-s-economy-go-from-here/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/question-mark01.jpg" />The U.S.'s first fiscal stimulus package 'of size' since the recession's start has passed - - albeit in a modified form that decreased spending by about $140 billion over the original outline.<br /><br />Further, the young <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/">President Barack Obama,</a> like the young President John F. Kennedy, has learned that presidential honeymoons can be short inside the beltway, particularly if you have to trade policy to obtain votes both inside your party and among the loyal opposition.<br /><br />Meanwhile, investors and the financial community more broader await the specifics pertaining to Obama administration's revised plan to <a href="http://www.ustreas.gov/news/index1.html">stabilize the banking system,</a> with <a href="http://stockcharts.com/charts/gallery.html?$INDU">the declining Dow</a> discounting that even a successful plan will require months of systemic adjustment, and, of course, more public funds.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/where-does-the-u-s-economy-go-from-here/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Where does the U.S. economy go from here?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/where-does-the-u-s-economy-go-from-here/">Where does the U.S. economy go from here?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 12 Feb 2009 14:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/where-does-the-u-s-economy-go-from-here/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1458393/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/12/where-does-the-u-s-economy-go-from-here/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Congress</category><category>Democrats</category><category>fiscal policy</category><category>gdp</category><category>monetary policy</category><category>Obama administration</category><category>Republicans</category><category>U.S. economy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 14:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Davos Recap: With castigation stage over, collaboration begins]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/02/davos-recap-with-castigation-stage-over-collaboration-begins/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/02/davos-recap-with-castigation-stage-over-collaboration-begins/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/02/davos-recap-with-castigation-stage-over-collaboration-begins/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/01/davos.jpg" />The nutshell on the <a href="http://www.weforum.org/en/index.htm">2009 World Economic Forum</a> held in Davos? It was a conference where nearly everyone agreed that the financial crisis started in and is primarily the result of U.S. policy errors, but agreed on little else after that. <br /><br />Further, the Davos gathering produced almost no new insights regarding the nature of the crisis beyond what is already known: that excessive leverage throughout the system, arcane and in some cases Frankenstein-like derivatives, inadequate national-level financial regulation, and the collapse of demand, set in motion first the U.S. recession, then the credit crunch, then the global recession.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/02/davos-recap-with-castigation-stage-over-collaboration-begins/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Davos Recap: With castigation stage over, collaboration begins</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/02/davos-recap-with-castigation-stage-over-collaboration-begins/">Davos Recap: With castigation stage over, collaboration begins</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 02 Feb 2009 18:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/02/davos-recap-with-castigation-stage-over-collaboration-begins/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1447761/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/02/davos-recap-with-castigation-stage-over-collaboration-begins/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>banking sector</category><category>Brazil</category><category>China</category><category>Davos</category><category>E.U.</category><category>fiscal policy</category><category>gdp</category><category>Japan</category><category>Mexico</category><category>monetary policy</category><category>Russia</category><category>U.S. economy</category><category>World Economic Forum</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 18:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[With rates near zero, investors will be focusing on the Fed's statement]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/27/with-rates-near-zero-investors-will-be-focusing-on-the-feds-st/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/27/with-rates-near-zero-investors-will-be-focusing-on-the-feds-st/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/27/with-rates-near-zero-investors-will-be-focusing-on-the-feds-st/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/04/fedlogo.jpg" alt="" />With its benchmark and new, short-term interest rate already in its 0-0.25% target range, investors are expected to concentrate on the U.S. Federal Reserve's statement and any information (or clues) it may provide about both the U.S. economy and the central bank's quantitative easing policy.<br /><br />Further, Fed officials are also considering a revision of the central bank's forecasts so that they include periods beyond three years, <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&amp;sid=aRPr8jPVFcpY">Boomberg News reported Tuesday</a>. The Fed will release its statement Wednesday at 2:15 p.m. ET.<br /><br />Economist Peter Dawson told BloggingStocks he, and probably many other economists, will be looking for any Fed commentary / analysis of its <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/05/federal-reserve-starts-buying-mortgage-backed-securities/">quantitative easing strategy</a>.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/27/with-rates-near-zero-investors-will-be-focusing-on-the-feds-st/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>With rates near zero, investors will be focusing on the Fed's statement</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/27/with-rates-near-zero-investors-will-be-focusing-on-the-feds-st/">With rates near zero, investors will be focusing on the Fed's statement</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 27 Jan 2009 18:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/27/with-rates-near-zero-investors-will-be-focusing-on-the-feds-st/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1442541/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/27/with-rates-near-zero-investors-will-be-focusing-on-the-feds-st/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bank sector</category><category>Bernanke</category><category>credit markets</category><category>deflation</category><category>featured</category><category>Fed</category><category>federal reserve</category><category>FederalReserve</category><category>inflation</category><category>monetary policy</category><category>quantitative easing</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 18:31:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[What happens if the U.S. enters a 'giddy growth' period?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/23/what-happens-if-the-u-s-enters-a-giddy-growth-period/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/23/what-happens-if-the-u-s-enters-a-giddy-growth-period/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/23/what-happens-if-the-u-s-enters-a-giddy-growth-period/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p>Readers of this space know that a preferred tactic, stemming from <a href="http://www.apsanet.org/">the graduate school years</a> and schmoozing with economists and policy wonks is to 'take the other side in an argument' or 'argue the alternate point-of-view.' <br /><br />Well, one argument forwarded by economic conservatives, market absolutists and others is that the proposed <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/bbdp/obama-details-three-part-recovery-plan/316186">fiscal stimulus package</a> will be 'inflationary' and that it 'won't stimulate the economy.'<br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Arguing to the contrary...</span><br /><br />Economist Peter Dawson took up the above argument, but only because BloggingStocks required him to do so (Ah, the power of the press!).<br /><br />"A stimulus package that's both inflationary and that won't stimulate the economy," Dawson said. "Hmm? The logic is a little curious here, because inflation implies that there's demand and economic growth, and a failure to stimulate the economy implies there's very little demand and hence very little or no economic growth. The conclusions contradict, so what do the economic conservatives say the stimulus is going create, demand or no demand? I'll leave it for them to clarify their argument." <br /><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/23/what-happens-if-the-u-s-enters-a-giddy-growth-period/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>What happens if the U.S. enters a 'giddy growth' period?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/23/what-happens-if-the-u-s-enters-a-giddy-growth-period/">What happens if the U.S. enters a 'giddy growth' period?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 23 Jan 2009 17:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/23/what-happens-if-the-u-s-enters-a-giddy-growth-period/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1439062/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/23/what-happens-if-the-u-s-enters-a-giddy-growth-period/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cpi</category><category>fiscal policy</category><category>fiscal stimulus package</category><category>gdp</category><category>inflation</category><category>monetary policy</category><category>U.S. economy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 17:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Trichet's (belated) two-step: ECB cuts key interest rate to record low 2% ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/15/trichets-belated-two-step-ecb-cuts-key-interest-rate-to-reco/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/15/trichets-belated-two-step-ecb-cuts-key-interest-rate-to-reco/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/15/trichets-belated-two-step-ecb-cuts-key-interest-rate-to-reco/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/jean-trichet.jpg" />The impossible has happened. The Chicago Cubs won the National League pennant? <br /><br />No, ECB President Jean-Claude Trichet is now in accommodation mode. <br /><br />Trichet, a legendary inflation hawk, presided over the European Central Bank as it <a href="http://www.ecb.int/home/html/index.en.html">cut its benchmark interest</a> rate by 50 basis points to 2% Thursday. <br /><br />It was fourth consecutive monthly interest rate cut for the ECB and it matches the record low interest rate reached during the 2003-2005 period. However, Trichet, at the ECB's regular post-meeting news conference, indicated monetary policy makers will avoid a cut in interest rates at its next meeting in February, <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aPg1bknCZKLM&amp;refer=home">Bloomberg News reported Thursday.</a><br /><br />Economist David H. Wang said there's a bright side and a downside to the ECB's most-recent action, and he isn't so sure the bank is done cutting rates, even with a prospective February pause.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/15/trichets-belated-two-step-ecb-cuts-key-interest-rate-to-reco/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Trichet's (belated) two-step: ECB cuts key interest rate to record low 2% </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/15/trichets-belated-two-step-ecb-cuts-key-interest-rate-to-reco/">Trichet's (belated) two-step: ECB cuts key interest rate to record low 2% </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 15 Jan 2009 12:02:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/15/trichets-belated-two-step-ecb-cuts-key-interest-rate-to-reco/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1430409/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/15/trichets-belated-two-step-ecb-cuts-key-interest-rate-to-reco/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ECB</category><category>euro zone</category><category>European Central Bank</category><category>gdp</category><category>Germany</category><category>interest rates</category><category>inthenews</category><category>monetary policy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 12:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Martin Wolf: U.S. fiscal stimulus is a necessary task, but not the only one]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/14/martin-wolf-u-s-fiscal-stimulus-is-a-necessary-task-but-not-t/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/14/martin-wolf-u-s-fiscal-stimulus-is-a-necessary-task-but-not-t/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/14/martin-wolf-u-s-fiscal-stimulus-is-a-necessary-task-but-not-t/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p>Can the U.S. government run $1 trillion budget deficits for two, three years? Indeed it can, <em>Financial Times</em> columnist <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/d7ff9856-e191-11dd-afa0-0000779fd2ac.html">Martin Wolf argues,</a> and the deficits can even be higher, for a while. After that, there's more work ahead. <br /><br />The specter of $1 trillion budget deficits may be vociferously opposed by Republicans and other economic conservatives, but Wolf, in so many words, says what other choice does the United States have? What would be the alternative? Simultaneously raising taxes now to lower the deficit? Hardly prudent. Doing nothing? Another dreadful idea. So, it's prime the pump, or sit there at the well and await nothing.<br /><br /><strong>Up ahead: two bigger tasks</strong><br /><br />What's more, <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/d7ff9856-e191-11dd-afa0-0000779fd2ac.html">Wolf sees</a> two additional tasks (structural changes) that are just as important to the goal of U.S. economic recovery -- but that may be even harder to implement: removing toxic assets from the banking system and reducing the U.S.'s structural current account deficit (the trade deficit). <br /><br />The first is the forced write-off of bad assets, fiscal recapitalization of the banks, or debt-for-equity tactic, and it should be done comprehensively and quickly. Slow, gradual bad-debt reduction is not the correct policy, Wolf argues, as it would delay the economic recovery.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/14/martin-wolf-u-s-fiscal-stimulus-is-a-necessary-task-but-not-t/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Martin Wolf: U.S. fiscal stimulus is a necessary task, but not the only one</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/14/martin-wolf-u-s-fiscal-stimulus-is-a-necessary-task-but-not-t/">Martin Wolf: U.S. fiscal stimulus is a necessary task, but not the only one</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/14/martin-wolf-u-s-fiscal-stimulus-is-a-necessary-task-but-not-t/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1429638/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/14/martin-wolf-u-s-fiscal-stimulus-is-a-necessary-task-but-not-t/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bank sector</category><category>Fed</category><category>fiscal policy</category><category>fiscal stimulus package</category><category>gdp</category><category>imports</category><category>Martin Wolf</category><category>monetary policy</category><category>quantitative easing</category><category>toxic assets</category><category>trade</category><category>trade deficit</category><category>U.S. economy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bernanke: Stimulus not enough without more for banks]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/13/bernanke-stimulus-not-enough-without-more-for-banks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/13/bernanke-stimulus-not-enough-without-more-for-banks/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/13/bernanke-stimulus-not-enough-without-more-for-banks/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/01/bernanke-4.jpg" alt="" />Two internationally known economists converged Tuesday on a common point regarding the link between stimulus and the U.S. economy's recovery -- but from different vantage points. <br /><br />U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, <a href="http://federalreserve.gov/newsevents/speech/bernanke20090113a.htm">in a speech</a> before the London School of Economics, said fiscal stimulus won't be enough to create a lasting recovery, unless it is accompanied by strong measures to stabilize the financial system. <br /><br />Meanwhile, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys"><span style="font-style: italic;">New York Times</span></a> economist <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/12/opinion/12krugman.html?_r=1">Paul Krugman </a>underscored the need for both a large fiscal stimulus capable of providing an immediate boost to the economy and providing stimulus 18 and 24 months out. <br /><br />In a <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/">CNBC interview</a> Tuesday, Krugman underscored the need for a large fiscal stimulus -- a critical mass of fiscal stimulus, if you will -- to counteract the massive amount of stimulus taken out of the economy from declines in consumer spending, business investment, home price depreciation, constrained credit by banks, and stock market declines.<br /><br />Krugman added that the $700-850 billion proposed fiscal stimulus package is too small. Earlier, in his column in <span style="font-style: italic;">The Times</span>, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/12/opinion/12krugman.html?_r=1">Krugman said</a> both shovel-ready and longer-term infrastructure projects were required to keep a lid on rising unemployment for the next two years.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/13/bernanke-stimulus-not-enough-without-more-for-banks/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bernanke: Stimulus not enough without more for banks</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/13/bernanke-stimulus-not-enough-without-more-for-banks/">Bernanke: Stimulus not enough without more for banks</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://federalreserve.gov/newsevents/speech/bernanke20090113a.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/13/bernanke-stimulus-not-enough-without-more-for-banks/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1428248/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/13/bernanke-stimulus-not-enough-without-more-for-banks/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bernanke</category><category>Fed</category><category>fiscal stimulus</category><category>fiscal stimulus package</category><category>gdp</category><category>monetary policy</category><category>quantitative easing</category><category>TARP</category><category>U.S. economy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Happy Birthday euro! Currency turns age 10 January 1]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/01/happy-birthday-euro-currency-turns-age-10-january-1/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/01/happy-birthday-euro-currency-turns-age-10-january-1/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/01/happy-birthday-euro-currency-turns-age-10-january-1/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/04/happy_birthday_45.jpg" />In most locales around the world, the New Year is a cause for a celebration. <br /><br />But how about a new year celebration combined with the birthday party? Talk about a celebration. <br /><br />When the new year dawns, Europeans will be doing just that - - at least Europeans in the euro zone: that's because the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euro">euro</a> currency turns age 10 on January 1, 2009. <br /><br /><span style="font-weight: bold;">Euro has strengthened Europe</span><br /><br />When launched January 1, 1999, 11 nations comprised the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euro_zone">euro zone:</a> Austria, Belgium, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Portugal, and Spain. Later, Cyprus, Greece, Malta, and Slovenia joined, and Slovakia will become a member on January 1, 2009 to bring euro zone membership to 16. <br /><br />Further, while some critics still denounce the euro as 'paving the way for end of Europe's broad social safety net' the euro currency has basically achieved its goals, with enormous benefits for Europe's citizens and visitors, so says economist Peter Dawson. The euro <a href="http://www.forex.com">traded at $1.3890</a> Wednesday morning.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/01/happy-birthday-euro-currency-turns-age-10-january-1/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Happy Birthday euro! Currency turns age 10 January 1</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/01/happy-birthday-euro-currency-turns-age-10-january-1/">Happy Birthday euro! Currency turns age 10 January 1</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 01 Jan 2009 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/01/happy-birthday-euro-currency-turns-age-10-january-1/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1415604/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/01/happy-birthday-euro-currency-turns-age-10-january-1/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dollar</category><category>ECB</category><category>euro</category><category>euro zone</category><category>Europe</category><category>European Central Bank</category><category>gdp</category><category>monetary policy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[How much money can the Fed create? ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/23/how-much-money-can-the-fed-create/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/23/how-much-money-can-the-fed-create/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/23/how-much-money-can-the-fed-create/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p>The U.S. Federal Reserve is reaching into its <a href="http://federalreserve.gov/newsevents/press/monetary/20081216b.htm">'new tool box'</a> to use quantitative easing to help jump-start the U.S. economy from it worst recession in decades, and it begs the question: is there a limit to amount of money the Fed can create? <br /><br />"That depends," economist David H. Wang told BloggingStocks. "There are very few case studies for quantitative easing, and there is not a consensus on what is the maximum amount of money available." <br /><br /><strong>Money: it makes the world go round</strong><br /><br />Quantitative easing involves increasing funds in the financial system after the Fed loses the ability to lower the cost of money from an interest rate standpoint. Basically, the Fed adds cash by purchasing Treasuries, agency debt, and if the need arises, other asset-backed securities, hoping that some of that money will be lent or otherwise deployed in commercial operations. <br /><br />The Fed's balance sheet has surged to $2.3 trillion from about $924 million in September, when the first wave of the financial crisis began to freeze credit markets and decimate stock markets around the world.<br /><br />Moreover, the Fed's balance sheet is likely to increase as other interventions become necessary to stabilize the financial system. For example, the Fed is on the hook for up to another $240-$265 billion as a result of the rescue of financial services giant <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">Citigroup</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/citigroup-incorporated/c/nys">C</a>). <br /><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/23/how-much-money-can-the-fed-create/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>How much money can the Fed create? </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/23/how-much-money-can-the-fed-create/">How much money can the Fed create? </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 23 Dec 2008 09:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/23/how-much-money-can-the-fed-create/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1409717/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/23/how-much-money-can-the-fed-create/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economy</category><category>Fed</category><category>inflation</category><category>interest rates</category><category>inthenews</category><category>monetary policy</category><category>money supply</category><category>quantitative easing</category><category>The Fed</category><category>TheFed</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 09:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Stabilized credit markets could hit more bumps in road in 2009, economist says]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/19/stabilized-credit-markets-could-hit-more-bumps-in-road-in-2009/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/19/stabilized-credit-markets-could-hit-more-bumps-in-road-in-2009/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/19/stabilized-credit-markets-could-hit-more-bumps-in-road-in-2009/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p>Global credit markets have recovered and stabilized following a brush with a global financial meltdown in September, but those markets have not normalized and a tough stretch of road remains ahead, so says an economist. <br /><br />"We are on 'a great, long, slow journey' to use a Chinese saying," economist David H. Wang told BloggingStocks. "We have to be prepared for more bumps in the road ahead in 2009. We must be both proactive and also take corrective action in the credit markets."<br /><br />Short-term interests have fallen considerably in the past three months, with the London rate for three-month loans in dollars (LIBOR) declining Friday to 1.50% from 4.82% earlier this fall, <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/markets/rates/keyrates.html">Bloomberg News reported,</a> primarily on the strength of $8.4 trillion in liquidity-oriented interventions by the U.S. Federal Reserve and the other, major central banks. <br /><br />The LIBOR is particularly important because it determines rates for $360 trillion of financial products worldwide, from home loans to derivatives. <br /><br /><strong>Central banks: on the watch for credit stress signs<br /><br /></strong>What could represent one of those 'bumps,' i.e. a re-igniting of short-term rates, in Wang's view? Another wave of home mortgage foreclosures, which would lead to another batch of toxic-bonds, write-offs, and financial institution stress, he said. The aforementioned "underscores the urgency of the Obama Administration and Congress passing a major home mortgage refinance plan for preventable foreclosures," Wang said. "If we stem the rise in mortgage foreclosures, we will make progress on the road leading to economic recovery."<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/19/stabilized-credit-markets-could-hit-more-bumps-in-road-in-2009/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Stabilized credit markets could hit more bumps in road in 2009, economist says</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/19/stabilized-credit-markets-could-hit-more-bumps-in-road-in-2009/">Stabilized credit markets could hit more bumps in road in 2009, economist says</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 19 Dec 2008 15:51:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/19/stabilized-credit-markets-could-hit-more-bumps-in-road-in-2009/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1406825/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/19/stabilized-credit-markets-could-hit-more-bumps-in-road-in-2009/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bond market</category><category>credit markets</category><category>interest rates</category><category>inthenews</category><category>LIBOR</category><category>monetary policy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 15:51:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
