In December, 2002, ten of the most prominent brokerage firms in the country agreed to a massive settlement. The charges involved well-documented claims that analyst reports issued by these firms were deceptive. The firms sold out their retail clients to curry favor with their underwriting clients.
The industry unleashed a massive PR campaign. It convinced you that it saw the error of its ways. They had "reformed." You could trust them again with your hard earned assets.
And you did. Money flowed back in the coffers of these firms and others.
Bloomberg News reports that two more big banks -- JPMorgan Chase (NYSE: JPM) and Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS) have made offers of $7 billion to 30,000 holders of Auction Rate Securities (ARS) -- those long-term securities whose yields reset in weekly auctions until the auctions failed this February. JPMorgan and Morgan Stanley also agreed to $60 million worth of fines. This brings to five the number of large firms that have settled so far. The Wall Street Journal reports that of the big firms that have yet to settle, Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS) is proving to be among the most unhelpful to its clients.
Meanwhile, the Wall Street Journal's James Stewart, who first got me writing about the ARS catastrophe, has finally broken his silence. And he seems to think that the ARS mess is much worse than he originally thought back in February. Stewart was shocked that brokers were unloading this toxic waste on customers so they could get it off of their books and out of the accounts of their executives. Stewart's reaction struck me as surprisingly naive -- particularly considering his long track record of reporting on Wall Street misdeeds.
Nevertheless, the problems with the frozen ARS continue to stress out investors who fell victim to Wall Street's chicanery. Among the top 10 municipal ARS issuers, the following have yet to offer any restitution to ARS holders (the value of their 2007 ARS issuance is in parentheses):
CNNMoney notes that Morgan Stanley said it would offer to repurchase all ARS "held by individuals, charities and small and medium-sized business with accounts of $10 million or less at the bank." Morgan Stanley will begin to start buying back $4.5 billion worth of ARS on September 30th and will "make its best effort to provide liquidity solutions" for institutional investors by the end of 2009. But New York attorney general Andrew Cuomo is not satisfied with Morgan Stanley's proposal.
Meanwhile, the list of big ARS issuers that have not settled grows shorter. Here are six holdouts (with their 2007 municipal ARS issuance in parentheses):
The Wall Street Journal reports that the $330 billion auction rate securities (ARS) scandal, which since February has frozen the funds of investors who thought they were getting a low risk place to park their cash, has finally generated its first criminal probe. The charge is that two Credit Suisse brokers lied "to investors about how they placed their money into short-term securities."
I have been following the ARS scandal since February when I first became aware of the situation. Since then, my post has generated 5,036 comments from people whose money has been frozen thanks to the collapse of the weekly auctions that were intended to set the yields on these municipal bonds. These commenters are trying to team up to figure out how best to get back their money.
The Journal reports that the Justice Department's U.S. attorney's office for New York's Eastern District, represents the first known criminal matter stemming from the crumbling ARS market. Up until then, the lawsuits were of a civil nature -- seeking class-action status and more than 80 individual arbitration claims. But a criminal probe based on lying could result in cash damages and jail terms for these brokers.
Six months of 2008 are now behind us and the stock market has not been a friendly place to most investors. Stability that was once found in household names that were industry giants is gone, and they have now been brought to their knees.
Many of them were the stocks we might have looked to in the past for stability, so you can be sure I put forward my five candidates with a little trepidation, but forward I go anyway. First a little review is in order.
Citigroup Inc. (NYSE: C) dropped from around $53 per share last year to around $30 in January and we can buy it today for around $17. Even at that price Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS) has downgraded it to a sell and thinks there is more bad news to come. Citigroup was the largest bank in the world. Not any more.
General Motors (NYSE: GM) was the largest car maker in the world. That was before the stock tumbled from $43 to its current $11 range. A crushing blow to long time investors hoping that someone in the company could stop the ship from sinking.
The Wall Street Journal's "The Game" column speculates that one of the results of the Bear Stearns crash could be the push of investment banks and commercial ones closer together, which could result in better handling of volatility with more stability. Some observers think Merrill Lynch & Co (NYSE: MER), Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS) or The Goldman Sachs Group Inc (NYSE: GS) could go that route by buying a commercial bank. Any move would force them to adhere to better reserve ratios, affect short term bank funding, and shrink balance sheets.
The Wall Street Journal reported that Google Inc (NASDAQ: GOOG) will soon make available a new service that measure hits on the Internet with the intent of helping advertisers decide where to buy ads online and would directly compete with comScore Inc (NASDAQ: SCOR) and Nielsen Online. Ad executives said Google's method could make targeting markets more efficient.
A Manhattan judge dismissed four claims made by American International Group Inc (NYSE: AIG) in its fight to regain control of a block of its shares held by Starr International, a company that once founded a lucrative compensation plan for AIG executives. AIG believes the shares held by Starr should continue to be used to fund employee compensation, the Financial Times reported.
WEB SITES:
According to Scorpio Partnership, Bloomberg reported that UBS AG (NYSE: UBS) and Merrill Lynch had slower growth in assets under management last year due to losses connected to the U.S. subprime crisis.
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS) F2Q08 Earnings Conference Call June 18, 2008 11:00 AM ET
Management Summary
Operator Welcome to the Morgan Stanley conference call. The following is a live broadcast by Morgan Stanley and is provided as a courtesy. Please note that this call is being broadcast on the internet through the company's website at www.morganstanley.com. A replay of the call and the webcast will be available through the company's website, and by phone, through July 18th, 2008.
This presentation may contain forward-looking statements. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which: speak only as of the date on which they are made; which reflect management's current estimates, projections, expectations or beliefs; and which are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially.
JPMorgan Chase (NYSE: JPM) shares are falling today after competitor Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS) reported its second-quarter profit sunk 61 percent to $1.01 billion, or 95 cents per share, after paying preferred dividends. MS beat analysts' estimates of a 92 cent per-share profit, but only after raising $1.4 billion through asset sales, which could be a bad sign for the financial sector and JPM. If you think this stock won't be rising too far in the coming months, then it could be a good time to look at a bearish hedged play on JPM.
After hitting a one-year high of $50.99 last June, the stock hit a one-year low of $36.01 in March. This morning, JPM opened at $38.53. So far today the stock has hit a low of $37.93 and a high of $38.70. As of 11:45, JPM is trading at $38.80, down $0.24. The chart for JPM looks bearish and steady, while S&P gives the stock its highest 5 STARS (out of 5) strong buy rating.
For a bearish hedged play on this stock, I would consider a September bear-call credit spread above the $50 range. A bear-call credit spread is an options position that combines the purchase and sale of call options to hedge risk in case the stock doesn't do what you think but still leverage nice returns. For this particular trade, we will make a 4.2% return in three months as long as JPM is below $50 at September expiration. JPM would have to rise by more than 30% before we would start to lose money. Learn more about this type of trade here.
Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS) reported earnings today, and while revenue and profit were -- not surprisingly -- down from a year ago period (but higher compared to the previous quarter), it actually had profits to speak of, $2.09 billion of them to be exact. Indeed, Goldman did it again, surpassing Wall Street expectations for a profit of $3.42 per share on $8.74 billion of revenue with a profit of $4.58 per share and revenue of $9.42 billion.
It would be only natural to ask how Goldman made $2 billion while Lehman lost $2.8 billion. The answers are many, not the least of which is size: Goldman is the world's biggest securities firm, Lehman Brothers (NYSE: LEH) is the smallest among the four Wall Street investment banks. Other factors could include better hedging, financial decision making, diversification, management and strength of balance sheet.
To get a feel of the differences in numbers, Goldman currently holds about $14 billion of leveraged loans, down from $52 billion at their height less than a year ago in August. Residential mortgages, which include the subprime loans, have fallen to about $15 billion on Goldman's balance sheet from $19 billion last quarter. Lehman Brothers' portfolio of mortgages, including commercial loans, stood at $60.8 billion. It also has about $18 billion of leveraged-buyout loans. It is no wonder CEO Fuld took ten minutes at the beginning of the conference call to take responsibility.
Editor's Note: In Toddo's honor, this post comes from Ag and Energy specialist Ryan Krueger. Please see more at www.minyanville.com.
In the first six months of 2008, the United States Oil Fund (AMEX: USO) has seen short interest rise 140%, or two times the total float. For its part, the Powershares DB Commodity Index (AMEX: DBC) has watched its short interest climb more than 500% this year. According to Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS), the average short interest among exchange-traded funds (ETF) in the U.S. is 10%.
I'll alert Minyanville.com readers when Congressional hearings are scheduled to address this other form of speculation, which includes windfall losses.
As for the market, it would seem the largest institutions are equally hopeful -- for the sake of their relative performance -- that this simply can't be: According to some reports I've seen, they're roughly 500 basis points underweight energy.
I'd imagine both will continue to be long shaking heads.
While Lehman Brothers (NYSE: LEH) reported dire preliminary Q2 results last week and is scheduled to release full results this morning, Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS) and Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS) are also scheduled to report quarterly results this week. Will the news continue to be dire, or will there be some glimmer of hope the numbers?
Goldman Sachs is expected by analysts surveyed by Thomson Financial to report second-quarter earnings of $3.41 per share, down 30.8% from the same period of last year, but up 5.6% from the previous quarter. The company has provided positive surprises recently -- by as much as 40.8%.
New York-based Goldman Sachs is one of the largest investment banking and asset management firms on the NYSE, a global leader in mergers and acquisitions advice and securities underwriting. In the past year, the company's revenues were $87.9 billion and its net income totaled $11.6 billion. Its long-term EPS growth forecast is 13.3%, which is better than the financial sector average. The consensus recommendation of analysts remains to hold Goldman Sachs.
Shares are down 17.1% since the beginning of the year, and down 23.7% from a year ago. GS trades at a P/E ratio of 8.37. Shares closed Friday at $11.54.
Sure, there are several earnings reports coming that are going to shake, rattle, and roll, the market this week, including Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS) and Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS), but what about those all important economic releases? Last week, the consumer price index was revealed for May and showed a monthly increase of .6% as energy was HOT once again, and the overall transportation costs rose the most since November 2007. Core inflation was up only .2% and investors liked the number as it calls for the continuation of a "Fed-Pause," which helped the dollar move up for the week.
New Residential Construction (permits) popped last month on an unexpected increase of the multi-family housing starts. Think about it for a minute and you will quickly realize that as families are losing their homes due to the deteriorating economic conditions, they still need live somewhere. So, the increase of 326,000 permits for multi-family housing makes perfect sense. But, don't be fooled by the fact that these are still mixed into the totals and have skewed the overall stats upwards.
Still, the reports have shown difficult conditions as the total starts have hit lows last seen in 1991. Before that, the lows of this level were seen in 1974. Economists over at Economy.com are looking for housing starts to drop again in May down to 985 million. Since the economy has become the real story (aside from the oil horror show), housing is vitally important, as it is really a proxy for the financial fortitude of the average family. Realize that if they are not buying homes, it is because they don't have the funds, cannot get credit and do not have confidence in their financial future.
Bloomberg News reports that 10 of the biggest names in investment banking are blocking investors from getting their hands on their share of the $330 billion Auction Rate Securities (ARS) that they were told was as safe as a money market fund.
I first posted about this back in February and now it has 4,325 comments from people trying to get at their money. Bloomberg quotes one victim of frozen ARS syndrome: Franklin Biddar, a 65-year old real estate investor who can't get his $100,000. "I can't do anything," said Biddar, who was so eager to unlock his money that he was willing to accept 11 percent less than what he paid for the securities. "Bank of America (NYSE: BAC) got me into these securities that are supposed to be as safe as a money market, and now they won't get me out."
Here's a list of the banks involved in this money blocking operation and the volume of municipal ARSs they issued between 2001 and 2007:
.jpg)
In December, 2002, ten of the most prominent brokerage firms in the country agreed to a massive settlement. The charges involved well-documented claims that analyst reports issued by these firms were deceptive. The firms sold out their retail clients to curry favor with their underwriting clients.
Six months of 2008 are now behind us and the stock market has not been a friendly place to most investors. Stability that was once found in household names that were industry giants is gone, and they have now been brought to their knees. .gif){kind=logo}
Goldman Sachs
Editor's Note: In Toddo's honor, this post comes from Ag and Energy specialist Ryan Krueger. Please see more at 
Goldman Sachs is expected by analysts surveyed by Thomson Financial to report second-quarter earnings of $3.41 per share, down 30.8% from the same period of last year, but up 5.6% from the previous quarter. The company has provided 
Closing Bell: Dow stages comeback as bulls battle bears
Investor confidence in global growth continues to decline
Can Jerry Seinfeld improve Microsoft's brand equity?
