<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Household Wealth Falls by $1.5 Trillion in Q2]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/21/household-wealth-falls-in-q2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/21/household-wealth-falls-in-q2/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/21/household-wealth-falls-in-q2/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p>The Federal Reserve has posted some data that shows the extent of economic decline in the second quarter. Here are some key numbers, as reported by <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE68G3NT20100917">Reuters</a>.</p>
<ul>
    <li>Household wealth fell by $1.5 trillion in the second quarter to $53.5 trillion. This sharply lower than the $64.2 trillion at the end of 2007.</li>
    <li>Stock losses amounted to $14.9 trillion, a drop of $1.95 trillion.</li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/21/household-wealth-falls-in-q2/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Household Wealth Falls by $1.5 Trillion in Q2</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/21/household-wealth-falls-in-q2/">Household Wealth Falls by $1.5 Trillion in Q2</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 21 Sep 2010 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/21/household-wealth-falls-in-q2/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19642344/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/09/21/household-wealth-falls-in-q2/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>consumer debt</category><category>Federal Reserve</category><category>household wealth</category><category>inthenews</category><category>mortgage debt</category><category>poverty</category><category>recession</category><category>stimulus</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Worst 10-year performers: MBIA takes a triple-A nosedive on risky mortgage debt]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/01/worst-10-year-performers-mbia-inc-takes-a-triple-a-nosedive-on/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/01/worst-10-year-performers-mbia-inc-takes-a-triple-a-nosedive-on/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/01/worst-10-year-performers-mbia-inc-takes-a-triple-a-nosedive-on/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mbi/" rel="tag">MBIA Inc (MBI)</a></p><p><em><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/07/worst-stocks-mbia-200-cs071808.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" />In this series, we take a look at the 25 stocks on the S&amp;P 500 Index (SPX) that have turned in the worst performance during the past decade -- what went wrong, and what happens next. (<a href="http://money.aol.com/investing/25-worst-performing-stocks-of-the-past-decade">See all 25</a>).<br /></em></p>
<p>While financial-services firms have been dragged down as a group for more than a year, few have flamed out with the spectacular ferocity of municipal bond insurer <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mbia-inc/mbi/nys">MBIA Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mbia-inc/mbi/nys">MBI</a>). In fact, among equities listed on the S&amp;P 500 during the past decade, only one stock has suffered a more severe plunge in share price.</p>
<p><strong>What went wrong?</strong> At no. 2 on our list of SPX slackers, MBI lost 91% of its value during the decade that ended June 30, 2008. The stock peaked at $76.02 in January 2007, which marked the last in a series of higher highs for the formerly uptrending security.</p>
<p>MBIA's troubles first started in January 2007, though its issues at the time would pale in comparison with later challenges. Then, the company agreed to pay $75 million to settle civil securities-fraud charges by federal and New York State authorities. MBIA was accused of making secret side deals with reinsurance companies to avoid stating a $170-million loss in 1998. As part of the settlement, MBIA said it would restate earnings from 1998 through 2004 and improve its business and accounting procedures.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/01/worst-10-year-performers-mbia-inc-takes-a-triple-a-nosedive-on/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Worst 10-year performers: MBIA takes a triple-A nosedive on risky mortgage debt</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/01/worst-10-year-performers-mbia-inc-takes-a-triple-a-nosedive-on/">Worst 10-year performers: MBIA takes a triple-A nosedive on risky mortgage debt</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 01 Aug 2008 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/01/worst-10-year-performers-mbia-inc-takes-a-triple-a-nosedive-on/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1262935/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/01/worst-10-year-performers-mbia-inc-takes-a-triple-a-nosedive-on/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bond insurer</category><category>MBI</category><category>MBIA Inc.</category><category>MbiaInc.</category><category>Moodys ratings</category><category>mortgage debt</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
