<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Option update: VRSN, IBM, MSFT volatility levels]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/21/option-update-vrsn-ibm-msft-volatility-levels/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/21/option-update-vrsn-ibm-msft-volatility-levels/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/21/option-update-vrsn-ibm-msft-volatility-levels/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ibm/" rel="tag">International Business Machines (IBM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a></p><p><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source="><img align="right" alt="" src="http://www.bloggingbuyouts.com/media/2007/08/flywall_final_logo_mini.gif" /></a><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/verisign-inc/vrsn/nas">VeriSign</a></strong> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/verisign-inc/vrsn/nas">VRSN</a>) option implied volatility flat at 36. <br />VRSN provides intelligent infrastructure services for the internet and telecommunications networks. VRSN will report its EPS on 11/1/07 and has an analyst day on 11/14. VRSN closed at $29.80. VRSN over all option implied volatility of 36 is near its 26-week average according to Track Data, suggesting non-directional risks.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/international-business-machines-corporation/ibm/nys">IBM</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/international-business-machines-corporation/ibm/nys">IBM</a>) implied volatility of 29 above 26-week average of 20. <br />IBM closed at $109.22. IBM over all option implied volatility of 29 is above its 26-week avearge of 20 according to Track Data, suggesting larger price risks.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a></strong> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) implied volatility of 28 above 26-week average of 22. <br />MSFT closed at $28.27. MSFT over all option implied volatility of 29 is above its 26-week average of 22 according to Track Data, suggesting larger risk.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/vix/nas">Volatility Index S&amp;P 500 Options</a></strong>-<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/vix/nas">VIX </a>at 26.32; 10-day moving average is 26.98.</p>
<p><br /><em>Daily options Update is provided by Stock Specialist Paul Foster of theflyonthewall.com</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/21/option-update-vrsn-ibm-msft-volatility-levels/">Option update: VRSN, IBM, MSFT volatility levels</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 21 Aug 2007 09:57:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/21/option-update-vrsn-ibm-msft-volatility-levels/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/970177/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/21/option-update-vrsn-ibm-msft-volatility-levels/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ibm</category><category>implied volatility</category><category>ImpliedVolatility</category><category>internet</category><category>microsoft</category><category>movement</category><category>msft</category><category>option implied volatility flat</category><category>OptionImpliedVolatilityFlat</category><category>telecommunications networks</category><category>TelecommunicationsNetworks</category><category>VeriSign</category><category>vrsn</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Foster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 09:57:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft down 11%, should Wall Street analysts be fired?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/28/microsoft-down-11-should-wall-street-analysts-be-fired/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/28/microsoft-down-11-should-wall-street-analysts-be-fired/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/28/microsoft-down-11-should-wall-street-analysts-be-fired/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a></p>As of 1:42 this afternoon, MSFT is down 11% - that's a whopping <em>$31 billion in market capitalization in one day</em>- <a href="http://finance.aol.com/usw/quotes/quotesandnews?sym=MSFT&amp;exch=NAS">to $24.24</a>. One of the <ahref="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/27/liveblogging-microsoft-fiscal-third-quarter-results-one-big-pen/#c1444022">commenters</a>to <ahref="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/27/liveblogging-microsoft-fiscal-third-quarter-results-one-big-pen/">mypost last night</a> suggests that "we all just get out of all stocks and then "all stupid analysts can befired and work in the fields with the Mexican farm workers, because that's what they deserve !!"<br /><br />Whilethat makes me laugh uproariously with my buddies at the coffee shop, I really don't blame the analysts here. It's notlike Microsoft has really given them precise figures to consider. And, in my opinion (and I'd argue, the opinion ofthose analysts, themselves), MSFT management strategies are murky at best. The Goldman Sachs analyst in last night'searnings call said it best, "It sounds like you're building a Google or Yahoo! inside the company." They'respending a few billion dollars more than expected (and, more than last year) on "cost of sales" and they'retelling us that all that money is being spent on increased Xbox 360 costs. <em>I don't think so</em>. And neither doesWall Street.<br /><br />Chris Liddell isn't going to tell us what's really going on, and my guess is that Softie isbuilding, deliberately and at great developer expense, proprietary software to do what all their competitors are doing.They've already spent a ton on their own ad serving platform - is that only the tip of the iceberg? The answer, I think,is yes. What do you think should be done about the 11% drop in market cap? And are you considering this a buyingopportunity? Or are you run, running as fast as you can?<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/28/microsoft-down-11-should-wall-street-analysts-be-fired/">Microsoft down 11%, should Wall Street analysts be fired?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 28 Apr 2006 13:36:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/28/microsoft-down-11-should-wall-street-analysts-be-fired/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/612960/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/28/microsoft-down-11-should-wall-street-analysts-be-fired/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>11%</category><category>analysts</category><category>expenses</category><category>market cap</category><category>MarketCap</category><category>microsoft</category><category>microsoft down</category><category>MicrosoftDown</category><category>movement</category><category>msft</category><category>mst</category><category>softie</category><category>wall street</category><category>wall street analyst</category><category>wall street analysts</category><category>WallStreet</category><category>WallStreetAnalyst</category><category>WallStreetAnalysts</category><category>xbox 360</category><category>Xbox360</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 13:36:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
