Citing the recent move by Radiohead to take their music directly to the fans (Radiohead was previously an EMI "act"), Billboard reports that Hands "proposed labels act more like venture capitalists" taking both profits and losses from artists recording and touring -- in direct opposition to the standard model of paying artists up front for album production. If that becomes operating procedure, EMI's move in April to discontinue use of Digital Rights Management technology could soon by overshadowed by more "pioneering" and inventive ideas, hopefully designed to give fans better access to the music they crave.
While it is not surprising that the new executives in charge of EMI would shake up the tired model, it is quite telling that a leaked memo as revealing as this could only come in the wake of Radiohead's move for their new album In Rainbows. It seems all too apparent that the record labels needed a very stable artist to make the first move toward a more fan-based market, as opposed to any label risking a move away from the tried and failing model that Hands' cites. EMI is apparently the first label to embrace these new ideas, as was indicated by the DRM move, but hopefully the bigger companies will follow suit in due time. How long can they sit on their "hands?"
What Happened When Alex Kenjeev Paid His Student Loan in Cash
What's a Realistic Retirement Age?
In a pop-music landscape dominated by the likes of Justin Timberlake and Fergie, it's becoming harder for music-industry veterans to compete. Rod Stewart, once a controversial Lothario with his threatening sexuality and ribald lyrics, has metamorphosized into a Scottish Tony Bennett, releasing his interpretation of old standards (and enjoying very respectable sales from the effort).
It's stunning: 

