<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Supreme Court pushes back on mutual fund issue]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/03/supreme-court-pushes-back-on-mutual-fund-issue/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/03/supreme-court-pushes-back-on-mutual-fund-issue/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/03/supreme-court-pushes-back-on-mutual-fund-issue/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/funds/" rel="tag">Mutual Funds</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a></p><p><a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/perfi/funds/2009-11-02-mutual-funds-supreme-court-_N.htm" target="_blank"><img border="0" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/oakmark-sm.jpg" width="220" height="196" alt="" />Investors are calling for an inquiry</a> into mutual fund fees, but the Supreme Court is reminding them that it isn't beholden to public opinion. The mutual fund industry is being accused of charging "excessive" fees, which could be particularly harsh on individual investors who use these tools as their primary way to access the market. Currently, the mutual fund industry has more than $10 trillion in assets under management, some of it through retirement and 529 college savings plans. </p>
<p>The Court doesn't seem inclined to step into the fray, saying that regulatory agencies are better equipped to address the situation. Chief Justice John Roberts, for example, said during arguments that "It makes a lot more sense to have the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/SEC/">SEC</a> regulate rates than to have courts do it, doesn't it?"</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/03/supreme-court-pushes-back-on-mutual-fund-issue/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Supreme Court pushes back on mutual fund issue</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/03/supreme-court-pushes-back-on-mutual-fund-issue/">Supreme Court pushes back on mutual fund issue</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 03 Nov 2009 10:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.usatoday.com/money/perfi/funds/2009-11-02-mutual-funds-supreme-court-_N.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/03/supreme-court-pushes-back-on-mutual-fund-issue/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19219989/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/03/supreme-court-pushes-back-on-mutual-fund-issue/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>antonin scalia</category><category>AntoninScalia</category><category>chief justice</category><category>ChiefJustice</category><category>fees</category><category>inthenews</category><category>john roberts</category><category>JohnRoberts</category><category>mutual fund</category><category>MutualFund</category><category>oakmark fund</category><category>OakmarkFund</category><category>sec</category><category>securities and exchange commission</category><category>SecuritiesAndExchangeCommission</category><category>stephen breyer</category><category>StephenBreyer</category><category>supreme court</category><category>SupremeCourt</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 10:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Eight ways to define the recession]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/12/eight-ways-to-define-the-recession/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/12/eight-ways-to-define-the-recession/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/12/eight-ways-to-define-the-recession/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/receessionpicutre.jpg" alt="" />We've watched <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/stockmarket/">stock market</a> numbers bounce around for two years. <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Unemployment/">Unemployment</a> stats have served as unpleasant reminders that, for some, leading indicators haven't translated to reality. We look for so many ways to understand the brutal economic environment with which we've had to contend, and <a target="_blank" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33266915/ns/business-stocks_and_economy/">all the choices can make your head spin</a>. So, let's make it simple. Here are eight ways to tack a label onto the financial world in which we live. </p>
<p><strong>1. Lost market value</strong><br />Total stock market losses from October 2007's top to March 2009's bottom: $11.2 trillion<br />Total gains in the stock market since the bottom: $4.6 trillion<br />Lost ground: $6.6 trillion</p>
<p><strong>2. Bad days<br /></strong>Percentage of the 10 worst days in history for the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/DowJonesIndustrialAverage/">Dow Jones Industrial Average</a> that happened in 2008, by point drops: 60%<br />Percentage of the 10 worst days in history for the DJIA that happened in 2008, by percentage drops: 30%</p>
<p><strong>3. Mutual funds<br /></strong>Value of <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/mutualfund/">mutual fund</a> assets at the end of 2007: $6.5 trillion<br />... and a year later: $3.7 million<br />Lost value: $2.8 trillion</p>
<p>But, it got a little better at the end of August 2009: $4.5 trillion (value of assets)</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/12/eight-ways-to-define-the-recession/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Eight ways to define the recession</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/12/eight-ways-to-define-the-recession/">Eight ways to define the recession</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33266915/ns/business-stocks_and_economy/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/12/eight-ways-to-define-the-recession/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19192550/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/12/eight-ways-to-define-the-recession/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>djia</category><category>dow jones industrial average</category><category>DowJonesIndustrialAverage</category><category>economic crisis</category><category>EconomicCrisis</category><category>financial crisis</category><category>FinancialCrisis</category><category>gold</category><category>home sales</category><category>HomeSales</category><category>inthenews</category><category>mutual fund</category><category>mutual funds</category><category>MutualFund</category><category>MutualFunds</category><category>recession</category><category>retail</category><category>retail sales</category><category>RetailSales</category><category>stock market</category><category>StockMarket</category><category>unemployed</category><category>unemployment</category><category>unemployment rate</category><category>UnemploymentRate</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Way Off Wall Street: The public responds to the Madoff scandal]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/06/way-off-wall-street-the-public-responds-to-the-madoff-scandal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/06/way-off-wall-street-the-public-responds-to-the-madoff-scandal/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/06/way-off-wall-street-the-public-responds-to-the-madoff-scandal/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/funds/" rel="tag">Mutual Funds</a></p><img hspace="4" border="0" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/07/blogginggary.jpg" alt="G.E.Sattler" /><em>Welcome to Way Off Wall Street, a column dedicated to providing Main Street opinions on topics of interest to investors. Each installment highlights the views of Americans who are far removed from the canyons of Wall Street -- and who often see things more clearly as a result.</em><br /><br />After reading nearly 400 publicly posted reader comments regarding the Bernard Madoff Ponzi scandal, I believe that I may have a good feel for the grass roots mood on the subject. In a nutshell, the average American internet crawler is thoroughly disgusted with our financial system and its regulatory agencies. They are fed up, strung out and unequivocally irate. As for Bernard Madoff himself, the overwhelming assertion is that he should be strung up immediately. That sentiment is not meant in a figurative sense either. People want Bernard Madoff publicly hanged, and they want it done with much fanfare in a place such as New York City's Central Park. Yes, this sounds rather coarse. Perhaps it's even uncivilized, but as the internet is my witness, this is what people are saying.<br /><br />Very few of the comments I have read indicate a feeling that Madoff's investors simply got what they deserved. I did, however, read many statements regarding the fact that high level greed obviously forced many large eggs into one very questionable basket. I myself have not much pity for those investors who lost "everything" to Madoff's twisted dealings. It is my opinion that if investors don't have the sense to diversify, and thereby somewhat protect themselves, they are not very deserving of much wealth. Even my own paltry savings reside in no less than five separate accounts, however paltry.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/06/way-off-wall-street-the-public-responds-to-the-madoff-scandal/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Way Off Wall Street: The public responds to the Madoff scandal</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/06/way-off-wall-street-the-public-responds-to-the-madoff-scandal/">Way Off Wall Street: The public responds to the Madoff scandal</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 06 Jan 2009 19:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/bbdp/madoff-reveals-assets-to-regulators/290508#Comments>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/06/way-off-wall-street-the-public-responds-to-the-madoff-scandal/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1416548/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/06/way-off-wall-street-the-public-responds-to-the-madoff-scandal/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>assets</category><category>Bernard Madoff</category><category>BernardMadoff</category><category>crime</category><category>madoff</category><category>mutual fund</category><category>MutualFund</category><category>Ponzi</category><category>punishment</category><category>SEC</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 19:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Piggybacking the pros: CGM Focus Fund]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/13/piggybacking-the-pros-cgm-focus-fund/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/13/piggybacking-the-pros-cgm-focus-fund/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/13/piggybacking-the-pros-cgm-focus-fund/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/funds/" rel="tag">Mutual Funds</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/x/" rel="tag">U.S. Steel (X)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pot/" rel="tag">Potash Corp. of Saskatchewan (POT)</a></p><p>This market is tough. Pros and novices alike are having a tough time. Particularly in a down market, a market commentators like to call a ""stock picker's market," I find it illustrative to dig deeper into the holdings of those special professional money managers that have found a way to make a go of it.</p>
<p>Take the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cgm-focus-fund/cgmfx/nmf">CGM Focus</a> (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cgm-focus-fund/cgmfx/nmf">CGMFX</a>) fund. This fund consistently shows up at the top of 1-year, 3-year, and multi-year best performers. CGM Focus has returned on average 37% per year for the past five years. While this is absolutely no guarantee that it will continue to perform like this, fund manager Chuck Heebner seems to have the special sauce -- at least for now.</p>
<p>So, what has been so successful for the fund?</p>
<p>Commodity picks like fertilizer plays <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/potash-corporation-of-saskatchewan-inc/pot/nys">Potash</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/potash-corporation-of-saskatchewan-inc/pot/nys">POT</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mosaic-company-the/mos/nys">Mosaic</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mosaic-company-the/mos/nys">MOS</a>) have been big positions and have been big winners. Steel plays like <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/united-states-steel-corporation/x/nys">US Steel</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/united-states-steel-corporation/x/nys">X</a>) have performed very nicely for CGM as well.</p>
<p>Looking at what worked is somewhat like looking into a rear-view mirror. These gains were in the past. What's Heebner and team buying now?</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/13/piggybacking-the-pros-cgm-focus-fund/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Piggybacking the pros: CGM Focus Fund</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/13/piggybacking-the-pros-cgm-focus-fund/">Piggybacking the pros: CGM Focus Fund</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 13 Apr 2008 16:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/13/piggybacking-the-pros-cgm-focus-fund/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1165845/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/04/13/piggybacking-the-pros-cgm-focus-fund/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cgm focus</category><category>cgmfx</category><category>Chuck Heebner</category><category>HES</category><category>Hess</category><category>MEMC</category><category>MOS</category><category>Mosaic</category><category>mutual fund</category><category>POT</category><category>Potash</category><category>RIG</category><category>Transocean</category><category>US Steel</category><category>WFR</category><category>X</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zack Miller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 16:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Mutual funds cry foul over new ETF product]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/19/mutual-funds-cry-foul-over-new-etf-product/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/19/mutual-funds-cry-foul-over-new-etf-product/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/19/mutual-funds-cry-foul-over-new-etf-product/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/indices/" rel="tag">Indices</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a></p>When the entire mutual fund industry is up in arms about a new form of ETF, should investors take note? You bet they should.
<p>There's an <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/65151-etns-thrive-despite-mutual-fund-tantrums?source=feed">interesting article</a> over on SeekingAlpha by <a href="http://www.hardassetsinvestor.com">HardAssetsInvestor.</a> The article focuses on the Exchange Traded Note product, something I've written about previously. The ETN is similar to an ETF in that it's a fund that trades like a stock. Unlike ETFs though, the ETN is not backed by the underlying assets. Rather, it's a zero-coupon note (essentially, a bond) that's backed by its underwriters. So, it throws an added layer of default risk into the whole investment game. </p>
<p>Where things get even more interesting is the tax treatment of the ETN product. Says HardAssetInvestor's Brad Zigler, "No tax consequence befalls the noteholder until the security is liquidated or matures. Taxes during the holding period? Zip. Nada. Bupkis. That beats the heck out of the tax treatment of mutual funds, too, which distribute income and capital gains." Unlike ETFs investing in commodities which are treated with a complicated tax structure on the futures the funds invest in, ETNs don't pass these taxes through to investors.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/19/mutual-funds-cry-foul-over-new-etf-product/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Mutual funds cry foul over new ETF product</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/19/mutual-funds-cry-foul-over-new-etf-product/">Mutual funds cry foul over new ETF product</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 19 Feb 2008 16:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/19/mutual-funds-cry-foul-over-new-etf-product/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1118952/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/19/mutual-funds-cry-foul-over-new-etf-product/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>djp</category><category>etf</category><category>etn</category><category>gsp</category><category>inthenews</category><category>mutual fund</category><category>MutualFund</category><category>rji</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zack Miller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 16:35:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Barron's says growth funds are back]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/03/barrons-says-growth-funds-are-back/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/03/barrons-says-growth-funds-are-back/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/03/barrons-says-growth-funds-are-back/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/funds/" rel="tag">Mutual Funds</a></p><p>In today's Barron's, investors will find <a href="http://online.barrons.com/public/article/SB120191118710736901.html?mod=9_0031_b_this_weeks_magazine_main">the annual Lipper/<em>Barron's</em> Fund Families Survey</a>. This survey, a pretty comprehensive look at performance of mutual fund families across different asset classes and investment strategies.</p>
<p>This year take-aways:<br /></p>
<ul>
    <li>Growth worked: Those funds that performed best definitely had a bias towards growth. </li>
    <li>International exposure: Funds that bought stocks with substantial foreign operations fared better. </li>
    <li>Avoiding pitfalls: Underexposure to potential "minefields like major banks, housing companies, and retailers" helped boost performance. </li>
    <li>High grade: Those funds that owned highest-quality bonds performed best. </li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/waddell-and-reed-financial-inc/wdr/nys">Waddell &amp; Reed</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/waddell-and-reed-financial-inc/wdr/nys">WDR</a>) placed first in 2007 betting on companies participating in "major infrastructure plays throughout the world," like <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/fluor-corporation/flr/nys">Fluor Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/fluor-corporation/flr/nys">FLR</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/deere-and-company/de/nys">Deere &amp; Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/deere-and-company/de/nys">DE</a>). Check out the Waddell &amp; Reed Dividend Income Fund (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wdvax/nmf">WDVAX</a>).</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/03/barrons-says-growth-funds-are-back/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Barron's says growth funds are back</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/03/barrons-says-growth-funds-are-back/">Barron's says growth funds are back</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 03 Feb 2008 17:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/03/barrons-says-growth-funds-are-back/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1105196/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/03/barrons-says-growth-funds-are-back/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>barrons</category><category>eaton vance</category><category>ev</category><category>inthenews</category><category>janus</category><category>jns</category><category>mutual fund</category><category>waddell and reed</category><category>wdr</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zack Miller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 17:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Look in the Heartland for value (HRSVX)]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/25/look-in-the-heartland-for-value-hrsvx/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/25/look-in-the-heartland-for-value-hrsvx/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/25/look-in-the-heartland-for-value-hrsvx/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/interviews/" rel="tag">Interviews</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/funds/" rel="tag">Mutual Funds</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/kss/" rel="tag">Kohl's Corp (KSS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a></p>MarketWatch was running a <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/story.aspx?guid=%7B3A8C2407%2D33A0%2D40FC%2DB087%2D8B3DFD3C1C3E%7D&amp;siteid=rss">interview today with Will Nasgovitz</a>, co-manager of the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/heartland-select-value-fund/hrsvx/nmf">Heartland Select Value Fund</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/heartland-select-value-fund/hrsvx/nmf">HRSVX</a>). The $332 billion fund has absolutely trounced the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/spdr-trust-series-1/spy/ase">S&amp;P 500</a> (AMEX: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/spdr-trust-series-1/spy/ase">SPY</a>) since 2000. Even with an extremely rocky 2007, the fund is up over 100% since 2000, where the S&amp;P is actually (ugh) in the red for the same time period.<br /><br />The secret sauce?<br /><br />MarketWatch quotes manager Nasgovitz as saying that the team running Select Value has a background covering small- and micro-cap stocks, which don't get as much analyst research coverage, that they apply when delving into larger companies.<br /><br />What's Nasgovitz buying of late?<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/25/look-in-the-heartland-for-value-hrsvx/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Look in the Heartland for value (HRSVX)</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/25/look-in-the-heartland-for-value-hrsvx/">Look in the Heartland for value (HRSVX)</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 25 Jan 2008 16:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/25/look-in-the-heartland-for-value-hrsvx/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1096479/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/25/look-in-the-heartland-for-value-hrsvx/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>interview</category><category>kohl's</category><category>KSS</category><category>legg mason</category><category>LeggMason</category><category>LM</category><category>mutual fund</category><category>MutualFund</category><category>SPY</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zack Miller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 16:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Mutual fund investors getting more help from the SEC?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/16/mutual-fund-investors-getting-more-help-from-the-sec/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/16/mutual-fund-investors-getting-more-help-from-the-sec/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/16/mutual-fund-investors-getting-more-help-from-the-sec/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/press-releases/" rel="tag">Press Releases</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/funds/" rel="tag">Mutual Funds</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a></p>Today's Wall Street Journal <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119518445190995437.html?mod=googlenews_wsj">reports</a> that The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) voted unanimously to consider changes to help investors compare choices in the nearly $12 trillion mutual-fund industry through use of summary information. Here's <a href="http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2007/2007-234.htm">a link to the actual press release </a>from the SEC itself.<br /><br />Though not a binding vote (passage of the changes would require a second SEC vote), the proposed changes sound like a relatively good thing for investors. Investors looking at mutual fund investments would have more "plain-English" sales and disclosure literature to access. In addition to a full-blown prospectus that each mutual fund publishes, a greater use would be made of summary information through a variety of channels, including greater use of the Internet.<br /><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/16/mutual-fund-investors-getting-more-help-from-the-sec/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Mutual fund investors getting more help from the SEC?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/16/mutual-fund-investors-getting-more-help-from-the-sec/">Mutual fund investors getting more help from the SEC?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 16 Nov 2007 11:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119518445190995437.html?mod=googlenews_wsj>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/16/mutual-fund-investors-getting-more-help-from-the-sec/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1041490/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/16/mutual-fund-investors-getting-more-help-from-the-sec/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>adviser</category><category>disclosure</category><category>investing</category><category>mutual fund</category><category>MutualFund</category><category>SEC</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zack Miller]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 11:35:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Option update 6-21-07: Oakley volatility &amp; volume elevated prior to anticipated LUX deal]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/21/option-update-6-21-07-oakley-volatility-and-volume-elevated-prior/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/21/option-update-6-21-07-oakley-volatility-and-volume-elevated-prior/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/21/option-update-6-21-07-oakley-volatility-and-volume-elevated-prior/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/press-releases/" rel="tag">Press Releases</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/lux/" rel="tag">Luxottica Group ADS (LUX)</a></p><p><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/oakley-inc/oo/nys"><img align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/06/flywall_final_logo_mini.gif" alt="www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL " />Oakley</a></strong> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/oakley-inc/oo/nys">OO</a>) volatility and volume elevated prior to anticipated LUX deal. Luxottica Group SpA (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/luxottica-group-s-p-a/lux/nys">LUX</a>), the world's largest manufacturer of eyewear, agreed to buy OO for $2.03 billion. I reported uncharacteristic OO activity on 5/31/07 and 6/6/07. OO option volume was heavy on 6/20/07. OO July option implied volatility of 43 was above its 26-week average of 35 according to Track Data, suggesting larger price fluctuations.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/morningstar-inc/morn/nas">Morningstar</a></strong> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/morningstar-inc/morn/nas">MORN</a>) option implied volatility Stable. MORN, a provider of independent investment research, closed at $47.57. MORN's 2007 Morningstar Investment Conference will feature leading mutual fund managers and industry leaders-discussing current topics and industry issues beginning June 27th in Chicago. MORN over all option implied volatility of 30 is near its 26-week average according to Track Data, suggesting standard deviation price risks.</p>
<p><em>Daily Option Update is provided by Stock Options Specialist Paul Foster of theflyonthewall.com.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/21/option-update-6-21-07-oakley-volatility-and-volume-elevated-prior/">Option update 6-21-07: Oakley volatility &amp; volume elevated prior to anticipated LUX deal</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 21 Jun 2007 09:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/21/option-update-6-21-07-oakley-volatility-and-volume-elevated-prior/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/923158/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/21/option-update-6-21-07-oakley-volatility-and-volume-elevated-prior/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2007 Morningstar Investment Conference</category><category>2007MorningstarInvestmentConference</category><category>eyewear,</category><category>independent investment research</category><category>IndependentInvestmentResearch</category><category>lux</category><category>luxottica</category><category>Luxottica Group SpA</category><category>LuxotticaGroupSpa</category><category>morn</category><category>morningstar</category><category>mutual fund</category><category>MutualFund</category><category>Oakley</category><category>oo</category><category>option implied volatility</category><category>OptionImpliedVolatility</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Foster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 09:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Six dumb investing moves NOT to make at year-end]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/23/six-dumb-investing-moves-not-to-make-at-year-end/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/23/six-dumb-investing-moves-not-to-make-at-year-end/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/23/six-dumb-investing-moves-not-to-make-at-year-end/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ibm/" rel="tag">International Business Machines (IBM)</a></p><p><img id="vimage_1" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/11/invest-150-073106.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />There's nothing like a quiet Thanksgiving Day to do some investment planning. Lots of cooking and cleaning and tense family conversations to avoid. Better to lock yourself in your home office and do some tinkering with your portfolio.</p>
<p>Or maybe not. For many, inertia often proves in hindsight to be the smartest investment move. </p>
<p>Really! Think about it -- how many times have you sold out of a stock at the bottom, only to watch it recover the next year? I've owned USG Corp. (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/usg-corporation/usg/nys">NYSE: USG</a>) and International Business Machines Corp. (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/international-business-machines-corporation/ibm/nys">NYSE: IBM</a>) for decades and <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/26/about-the-stock-bloggers-amey-stone/">I know of what I speak (er, write)</a>.</p>
<p>So before you start trading this holiday, take care to avoid these six stupid year-end investing moves:</p>
<p><strong>1. Selling a great stock too early</strong> just to take some profits that you will soon blow on holiday spending. Check out the three-year chart for Apple Computer, Inc. (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-computer-inc/aapl/nas?freq=1&amp;dr=60&amp;daysb4=0">NASDAQ:AAPL</a>) for some discouragement. The stock has had the steepest of slides, but imagine if you'd held on for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-computer-inc/aapl/nas/charts?dr=60&amp;symbs=&amp;ag=&amp;index=&amp;te=mountain&amp;se=default&amp;vl=on&amp;ss=on&amp;hs=on&amp;vs=on&amp;sym=AAPL&amp;exch=USA&amp;state=1&amp;settings=1&amp;vl1=on&amp;ss1=on&amp;dv1=off&amp;hs1=on&amp;vs1=on&amp;scs=0&amp;daysb4=0&amp;fromdate=&amp;todate=&amp;freq=1&amp;timeframe=20">the past five years</a>?</p>
<p><strong>2. Holding onto a terrible stock because you hope it will come back</strong> and forgoing the opportunity to take a tax loss. If you are going to make an investing move for tax reasons, 'tis the season to sell losers. Look over your portfolio for real dogs. Try to be as dispassionate as possible. If you have a sizable loss and don't see a catalyst in the next few months that could drive the stock higher, sell now and reap the tax benefit. You can always buy it back -- but be sure to wait at least 30 days so you don't run afoul of the "<a href="http://www.fool.com/taxes/2000/taxes001006.htm">wash sale</a>" rule.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/23/six-dumb-investing-moves-not-to-make-at-year-end/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Six dumb investing moves NOT to make at year-end</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/23/six-dumb-investing-moves-not-to-make-at-year-end/">Six dumb investing moves NOT to make at year-end</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 23 Nov 2006 12:25:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/23/six-dumb-investing-moves-not-to-make-at-year-end/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/703892/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/23/six-dumb-investing-moves-not-to-make-at-year-end/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>mutual fund</category><category>MutualFund</category><category>stock</category><category>tax loss</category><category>TaxLoss</category><category>wash sale</category><category>WashSale</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Amey Stone]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 12:25:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is Google a mutual fund?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/24/is-google-a-mutual-fund/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/24/is-google-a-mutual-fund/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/24/is-google-a-mutual-fund/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a></p><p><a title="Photo Sharing" href="http://www.taulli.com"><img height="99" alt="google" hspace="4" src="http://static.flickr.com/91/223872631_e6d020429b_m.jpg" width="240" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com">Google</a> has close to $10 billion in cash. Even though it is significantly upping its capital investments (such as in data centers), the company is likely to post $1 billion in free cash flow this year.</p>
<p>However, Google is now confronting an obscure Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) rule; that is, if securities make up more than 40% of assets, then a company must essentially become a mutual fund. This would be a headache (for example, a mutual fund cannot issue stock options). Consequently, Google's high-paid lawyers are trying to find creative ways of obtaining an exemption. In fact, years ago, <a href="http://www.microsoft.com">Microsoft</a> and<a href="http://www.yahoo.com"> Yahoo!</a> were able to get exemptions.</p>
<p>But the $10 billion cash hoard raises some interesting issues. First of all, Google is getting low returns on the $10 billion - which have been roughly 4% this year.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/24/is-google-a-mutual-fund/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Is Google a mutual fund?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/24/is-google-a-mutual-fund/">Is Google a mutual fund?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 24 Aug 2006 15:41:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/24/is-google-a-mutual-fund/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/658732/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/24/is-google-a-mutual-fund/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Google</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>Mutual Fund</category><category>MutualFund</category><category>Yahoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 15:41:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Blogging Stocks interview: Six defensive picks]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/31/blogging-stocks-interview-six-defensive-picks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/31/blogging-stocks-interview-six-defensive-picks/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/31/blogging-stocks-interview-six-defensive-picks/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/conventions-and-conferences/" rel="tag">Conventions and Conferences</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/live-coverage/" rel="tag">Live Coverage</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pep/" rel="tag">PepsiCo (PEP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deo/" rel="tag">Diageo plc (DEO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cl/" rel="tag">Colgate-Palmolive (CL)</a></p><p>I met recently in New York with the managers of the Quaker Capital Opportunity Fund (QUKTX). The large-cap fund hasn't hit it out of the park the past few years -- its returns are flat so far in 2006 and the fund slightly underperformed the S&amp;P 500 in 2004 and 2005, gaining 16.3% and 9.2% respectively, according to Morningstar.</p>
<p>But fund managers <a href="http://www.knottcapital.com/cms/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=37&amp;Itemid=93">Michael Barron and Charlie Knott</a> have had the fund positioned defensively, given their concerns about the slowing economy and rising interest rates. </p>
<p>I asked them which stocks they like the best right now and was impressed with their picks. The list is made up of solid companies in the food, beverage, consumer staples and drug sectors. A couple are foreign-based firms, which could help cushion them from U.S. turmoil. If, like Barron and Knott, you want to stay in the market but your main goal is preserving your capital, these are six stocks to consider:</p>
<p><strong>PepsiCo Inc</strong>. (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/usw/quotes/quotesandnews?sym=pep&amp;exch=NYS">NYSE: PEP</a>). Recent earnings news has been good and the stock has climbed from $58 to $63.50 in the past three months.</p>
<p><strong>Colgate-Palmolive</strong> (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/usw/quotes/quotesandnews?sym=cl&amp;exch=NYS">NYSE: CL</a>). The stock is up nicely this year, but fell a couple of dollars recently as second-quarter earnings dropped from a year ago due to restructuring charges. Sounds like a near-term opportunity.</p>
<p><strong>Staples Inc</strong>. (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/usw/quotes/quotesandnews?sym=cl&amp;exch=NYS">NASDAQ: SPLS</a>). This stock hit hard times in May, but analysts are positive on it.</p>
<p><strong>Diageo PLC ADS</strong> (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/usw/quotes/quotesandnews?sym=deo&amp;exch=NYS">NYSE: DEO</a>). This liquor maker has done decently all year, but had a nice pop in just the past week. </p>
<p><strong>Sanofi-Aventis ADS</strong> (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/usw/quotes/quotesandnews?sym=sny&amp;exch=NYS">NYSE: SNY</a>). This large drug company has been very volatile this year (this is the riskiest of the bunch, I'd say). But its treatment to battle obesity has huge promise. It reports earnings on Aug. 2 and analysts expect it to earn 78 cents a share.</p>
<p><strong>Cephalon Inc</strong>. (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/usw/quotes/quotesandnews?sym=ceph&amp;exch=NAS">NASDAQ: CEPH</a>). Another biotech, this one has drugs for sleep disorders, cancer and pain. It's down year-to-date, but up nicely since late June.</p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;" class="MsoNormal"><font size="3" face="Times New Roman"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/26/about-the-stock-bloggers-amey-stone/"><em>Amey Stone</em></a><em> is a senior editor at </em><a href="http://money.aol.com/"><em><stockticker>AOL</stockticker> Money &amp; Finance</em></a><em> and longtime financial writer in <state>
<place>New York</place>
</state>.</em></font></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/31/blogging-stocks-interview-six-defensive-picks/">Blogging Stocks interview: Six defensive picks</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 31 Jul 2006 14:36:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/31/blogging-stocks-interview-six-defensive-picks/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/648866/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/31/blogging-stocks-interview-six-defensive-picks/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Cephalon</category><category>Colgate-Palmolive</category><category>Diageo</category><category>Knott Capital</category><category>KnottCapital</category><category>mutual fund</category><category>MutualFund</category><category>Pepsi</category><category>Quaker Capital</category><category>QuakerCapital</category><category>Sanofi</category><category>Staples</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Amey Stone]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 14:36:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
