<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA['Indiana Jones' rises to the top while 'Prince Caspian' continues to disappoint]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/26/indiana-jones-rises-to-the-top-while-prince-caspian-continue/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/26/indiana-jones-rises-to-the-top-while-prince-caspian-continue/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/26/indiana-jones-rises-to-the-top-while-prince-caspian-continue/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="middle" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/indiana_jones_crystal_skull.jpg" /><br />The box-office results are in, and I don't think there's any surprise concerning which film took the top honors this Memorial Day. <em>Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull</em>, distributed by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">Viacom </a>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/viacom-inc-new/via/nys">VIA</a>), took in $126 million over the four-day weekend at domestic theaters, according to <a href="http://boxofficemojo.com/weekend/chart/?view=&amp;yr=2008&amp;wknd=21a&amp;p=">Boxofficemojo</a>. Taking into account Thursday showings<em>, Skull</em> has so far grossed about $151 million. These aren't record numbers as far as I know, but they certainly were high enough to displace <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">Disney</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>) <em>Prince Caspian </em>flick from the number-one position. The movie captured about $28.6 million at the multiplexes, good for second place; up to now, the <em>Narnia </em>sequel has a total tally of around $96 million.</p>
<p>Which is completely unacceptable to Disney shareholders (I'm one of the disappointed, and I <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/19/is-disneys-narnia-fantasy-dead/">wrote</a> about my disappointment last week). Consider that the Memorial Day weekend is done, and that this is the second weekend for the project. To not crack $100 million domestically for a movie brand that was supposed to be strong considering the business that the first<em> Narnia</em> did back in winter 2005 should be troubling to Bob Iger.</p>
<p>At least<em> Iron Man</em> is around to cheer me up. The <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/marvel-entertainment-inc/mvl/nys">Marvel</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/marvel-entertainment-inc/mvl/nys">MVL</a>) masterpiece is still in the top five at number three and has now enjoyed a $257 million take. I own shares in Marvel, so I'm glad the picture is offering some balance to Disney's relative flop. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">News Corp.</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">NWS</a><em>) What Happens in Vegas</em> and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a><em>) Speed Racer</em> took up fourth and fifth place, respectively. I suppose I shouldn't complain; Time Warner shareholders must put up with the fact that<em> Speed Racer</em> hasn't even cracked $40 million yet. Maybe that's the true bomb of the summer. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/26/indiana-jones-rises-to-the-top-while-prince-caspian-continue/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>'Indiana Jones' rises to the top while 'Prince Caspian' continues to disappoint</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/26/indiana-jones-rises-to-the-top-while-prince-caspian-continue/">'Indiana Jones' rises to the top while 'Prince Caspian' continues to disappoint</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 26 May 2008 14:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/19/is-disneys-narnia-fantasy-dead/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/26/indiana-jones-rises-to-the-top-while-prince-caspian-continue/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1205630/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/26/indiana-jones-rises-to-the-top-while-prince-caspian-continue/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BobIger</category><category>DIS</category><category>Disney</category><category>Iron Man</category><category>IronMan</category><category>Marvel</category><category>MVL</category><category>Narnia</category><category>NWS</category><category>SpeedRacer</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TWX</category><category>VIA</category><category>Viacom</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 14:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Disney looks to C.S. Lewis for continued box office boost]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/30/disney-looks-to-c-s-lewis-for-continued-box-office-boost/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/30/disney-looks-to-c-s-lewis-for-continued-box-office-boost/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/30/disney-looks-to-c-s-lewis-for-continued-box-office-boost/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a></p><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/07/fly-logo-(aol).gif" alt="" /></a>At Comic-Con this year, the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">Walt Disney Company</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>) announced its commitment to make <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/07/28/comic-con-breaking-news-disney-commits-to-make-all-narnia-fil/"></a><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2007/07/28/comic-con-breaking-news-disney-commits-to-make-all-narnia-fil/">all </a>seven of the Chronicles of Narnia books into feature films, releasing one a year starting in May '08 with Prince Caspian. This decision follows the success of the adaptation of the first book -- The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe -- which grossed almost $300 million.<br /><br />This decision is not surprising, following the conclusion of Disney's Pirates of the Caribbean trilogy, which has no immediate plans to continue. Disney is predictably looking for its next goldmine franchise, and what better to use than a seven book series which already had a successful start?<br /><br />The only question is whether the quality of production will suffer in the sequels from such an ambitious filming schedule, and after Disney pulled off the Pirates trilogy with such dazzling effects, I doubt that will be a concern -- although the quality of the Pirates scripts did fade down the stretch. At least with these movies, the writers will have a classic source to guide them.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/30/disney-looks-to-c-s-lewis-for-continued-box-office-boost/">Disney looks to C.S. Lewis for continued box office boost</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 30 Jul 2007 15:56:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/30/disney-looks-to-c-s-lewis-for-continued-box-office-boost/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/953651/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/07/30/disney-looks-to-c-s-lewis-for-continued-box-office-boost/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>book</category><category>chronicles of narnia</category><category>ChroniclesOfNarnia</category><category>cs lewis</category><category>CsLewis</category><category>dis</category><category>disney</category><category>film</category><category>movie</category><category>narnia</category><category>pirates of the caribbean</category><category>PiratesOfTheCaribbean</category><category>prince caspian</category><category>PrinceCaspian</category><category>the lion the witch and the wardrobe</category><category>TheLionTheWitchAndTheWardrobe</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Buscemi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 15:56:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Evan Almighty's arc just sank]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/25/evan-almightys-arc-just-sank/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/25/evan-almightys-arc-just-sank/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/25/evan-almightys-arc-just-sank/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/via/" rel="tag">Viacom (VIA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sne/" rel="tag">Sony Corp ADR (SNE)</a></p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/23/what-happens-if-universal-pictures-evan-almighty-flops/"><img align="right" style="width: 183px; height: 123px;" alt="" src="http://www.tublogdecine.es/wp-content/themes/Cinestar2/img/almighty.bmp" />I recently blogged</a> about my concerns if <span style="font-style: italic;">Evan Almighty</span> flopped this weekend.<br /><br />I, as well as many others, would classify the $32.1 million opening weekend of <span style="font-style: italic;">Evan as </span>a flop. <a style="font-style: italic;" href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118270646516746291.html?mod=home_whats_news_us">Peter Sanders of the WSJ </a>believes that <span style="font-style: italic;">Evan Almighty</span> was the first "major pothole" in Hollywood's sequel-filled summer. He also put <span style="font-style: italic;">Evan </span>in the same category as <span style="font-style: italic;">Spider-Man 3, Shrek the Third and Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End</span>, by saying May's blockbuster "threequels" were all expected to fall short of their previous domestic sales numbers. <br /><br />Could that be true? <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118270646516746291.html?mod=home_whats_news_us">Looking at the numbers,</a> Sanders has a good argument. That's only if you thought sequels should outperform the original. Other than <span style="font-style: italic;">Shrek II,</span> most of the recent sequels made less than its predecessors. Even the Harry Potter franchise couldn't make a sequel that outperformed the $317.5 million earned from <span style="font-style: italic;">Sorcerer's Stone</span>.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/25/evan-almightys-arc-just-sank/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Evan Almighty's arc just sank</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/25/evan-almightys-arc-just-sank/">Evan Almighty's arc just sank</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 25 Jun 2007 19:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/25/evan-almightys-arc-just-sank/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/926349/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/25/evan-almightys-arc-just-sank/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bourne</category><category>bruce almighty</category><category>BruceAlmighty</category><category>carell</category><category>dis</category><category>disney</category><category>evan almighty</category><category>EvanAlmighty</category><category>ge</category><category>general electric</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>harry potter</category><category>HarryPotter</category><category>hollywood</category><category>hot rod</category><category>HotRod</category><category>lasseter</category><category>mummy</category><category>narnia</category><category>paramount</category><category>pirates</category><category>pixar</category><category>sequel</category><category>shadyac</category><category>shrek</category><category>sisterhood</category><category>sne</category><category>sony</category><category>sorcerer's stone</category><category>Sorcerer'sStone</category><category>spider man</category><category>SpiderMan</category><category>steve jobs</category><category>SteveJobs</category><category>superbad</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TWX</category><category>universal pictures</category><category>UniversalPictures</category><category>VIA</category><category>viacom</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Shult]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 19:50:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
