<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Big Screen TV or Health Care Insurance?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/08/big-screen-tv-or-health-care-insurance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/08/big-screen-tv-or-health-care-insurance/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/08/big-screen-tv-or-health-care-insurance/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/presidential-elections/" rel="tag">Presidential Elections</a></p><p>Health care is a very serious matter, and polling indicates that Americans consider it of the utmost importance, rating it right after the economy in general, and above the Iraq war and homeland security.</p>
<p>It is strange to me then that<em> 'television,'</em> while not showing up in national polls, ranks higher then health care as a priority when it comes to household spending. If you believe the numbers in the news, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Television_in_the_United_States">99% of households</a> own televisions but only <a href="http://health.usnews.com/usnews/health/healthday/070828/record-number-of-americans-lack-health-insurance.htm">84% have health insurance</a> in any form.</p>
<p>Certainly cost and availability are the screaming issues of the day. However, value judgments also play a roll and I believe that whatever solutions are proposed, individual choice and responsibility should remain of paramount importance and that maintaining competition in the market place remain a principal goal.</p>
<p><em></em></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/08/big-screen-tv-or-health-care-insurance/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Big Screen TV or Health Care Insurance?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/08/big-screen-tv-or-health-care-insurance/">Big Screen TV or Health Care Insurance?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 08 Feb 2008 16:32:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/08/big-screen-tv-or-health-care-insurance/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1107755/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/08/big-screen-tv-or-health-care-insurance/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Defense spending</category><category>DefenseSpending</category><category>financial priorities</category><category>FinancialPriorities</category><category>Health Care</category><category>HealthCare</category><category>Liber</category><category>national health care</category><category>NationalHealthCare</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 16:32:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The UAW as GM's health care plan provider?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/18/the-uaw-as-gms-health-care-plan-provider/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/18/the-uaw-as-gms-health-care-plan-provider/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/18/the-uaw-as-gms-health-care-plan-provider/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/general-motors-gm-logo.jpg" alt="" />As a nation, we seem to be evolving toward consensus that saddling employers with the responsibility of arranging and paying for health care is an inefficient system. Such a system demands companies develop expertise that has no relationship to their core business. <br /><br />This begs the question -- if not these corporations, then who? According to the <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/autos/content/sep2007/bw20070917_722671.htm?chan=rss_topStories_ssi_5">GM-United Auto Workers negotiations</a>, the answer could be, the unions that represent GM employees. Is this a good solution for the workers, the corporations, investors, and/or the country? My impressions to date are no, yes, yes, and no. <br /><br />If I were a UAW retiree, I'd be very nervous about the likelihood that the UAW bean counters could do a better job than GM in allocating the right amount of money to cover future health benefits. Certainly, GM is going to sharpen its pencil in an attempt to fund this as leanly as possible, and even at that, the pot will no doubt stretch the corporation's wallet.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/18/the-uaw-as-gms-health-care-plan-provider/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The UAW as GM's health care plan provider?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/18/the-uaw-as-gms-health-care-plan-provider/">The UAW as GM's health care plan provider?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 18 Sep 2007 15:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.businessweek.com/autos/content/sep2007/bw20070917_722671.htm?chan=rss_topStories_ssi_5>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/18/the-uaw-as-gms-health-care-plan-provider/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/992477/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/18/the-uaw-as-gms-health-care-plan-provider/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>auto workers union</category><category>AutoWorkersUnion</category><category>car industry</category><category>CarIndustry</category><category>f</category><category>featured</category><category>ford</category><category>general motors</category><category>GeneralMotors</category><category>gm</category><category>health care</category><category>HealthCare</category><category>national health care</category><category>NationalHealthCare</category><category>unions</category><category>united auto workers</category><category>UnitedAutoWorkers</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Barlow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 15:15:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
