<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Oil and Natural Gas: The Anomaly Continues]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/01/oil-and-natural-gas-the-anomaly-continues/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/01/oil-and-natural-gas-the-anomaly-continues/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/01/oil-and-natural-gas-the-anomaly-continues/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p><img border="1" align="right" vspace="4" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/oilprices.jpg"  alt="" />If, as an investor, you're surprised by the ongoing anomaly in the oil/natural gas relationship, you're not the only one. <br />
<br />
The background: Oil historically trades at about 8 times the price of natural gas. Currently it's trading at <a href="http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=$NATGAS">25.8 times</a> natural gas. About three months ago, the ratio was 20.<br />
<br />
In late Tuesday afternoon trading, oil (West Texas Intermediate) was up $3.60 to <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/light-sweet-crude-oil-futures-apr-2011-composite/%252fcl/j11/nym">$100.578 per barrel</a>, while natural gas was down 16 cents to $3.88 per million British thermal units (MMBtu).<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/01/oil-and-natural-gas-the-anomaly-continues/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Oil and Natural Gas: The Anomaly Continues</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/01/oil-and-natural-gas-the-anomaly-continues/">Oil and Natural Gas: The Anomaly Continues</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 01 Mar 2011 18:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/01/oil-and-natural-gas-the-anomaly-continues/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19864034/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/01/oil-and-natural-gas-the-anomaly-continues/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>natural gas</category><category>natural gas prices</category><category>oil prices</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 18:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Natural Gas Use Likely to Double]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/02/natural-gas-use-to-double/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/02/natural-gas-use-to-double/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/02/natural-gas-use-to-double/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/03/naturalgasvalve-1267720115.jpg" alt="natural gas" />A new study conducted by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology states that <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/25/business/energy-environment/25natgas.html?ref=business&amp;pagewanted=print">natural gas usage will double</a> in the next several decades, from the present 20% to 40%.</p>
<p>Why natural gas? First off, we have plenty of it. Globally, we have a century and half of recoverable natural gas. In the Unites States, the amount of recoverable gas is equal to 92 times consumption.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/02/natural-gas-use-to-double/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Natural Gas Use Likely to Double</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/02/natural-gas-use-to-double/">Natural Gas Use Likely to Double</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 02 Jul 2010 09:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/02/natural-gas-use-to-double/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19531615/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/07/02/natural-gas-use-to-double/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>carbon emissions</category><category>featured</category><category>fracking</category><category>inthenews</category><category>MIT</category><category>natural gas</category><category>natural gas prices</category><category>natural gas use to double</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 09:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Energy Department Admits Numbers on Natural Gas Production Are Wrong]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/05/energy-department-admits-numbers-on-natural-gas-production-are-w/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/05/energy-department-admits-numbers-on-natural-gas-production-are-w/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/05/energy-department-admits-numbers-on-natural-gas-production-are-w/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a></p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/04/gaspipeline.jpg" /> <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303912104575163891292354932.html?mod=WSJ_hps_LEFTWhatsNews">The Energy Department</a> said that its statistics on natural gas production are wrong.
<p>The Energy Information Administration, the statistical arm of the Energy Department, regularly issues its 914 report which is used by the industry and analysis as guide for everything from making capital investments to predicting future natural gas prices and stock recommendations.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/05/energy-department-admits-numbers-on-natural-gas-production-are-w/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Energy Department Admits Numbers on Natural Gas Production Are Wrong</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/05/energy-department-admits-numbers-on-natural-gas-production-are-w/">Energy Department Admits Numbers on Natural Gas Production Are Wrong</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 05 Apr 2010 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303912104575163891292354932.html?mod=WSJ_hps_LEFTWhatsNews>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/05/energy-department-admits-numbers-on-natural-gas-production-are-w/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19425996/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/05/energy-department-admits-numbers-on-natural-gas-production-are-w/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>eia</category><category>inthenews</category><category>natural gas prices</category><category>NaturalGasPrices</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Large Price Gap Between Oil and Natural Gas Persists]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/19/large-price-gap-between-oil-and-natural-gas-persists/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/19/large-price-gap-between-oil-and-natural-gas-persists/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/19/large-price-gap-between-oil-and-natural-gas-persists/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/gasoline-2.jpg" />Something's got to give regarding oil and natural gas prices: the gap between the two is too large -- oil is currently 15.7 times the price of natural gas, when the historical average <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&amp;sid=a6O1M1NvtQ3U">is about 8.4</a> over the past decade. <br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.nymex.com">Oil</a> traded Friday afternoon up 62 cents to $79.68 per barrel, while <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/markets/commodities/cfutures.html">natural gas</a> is down 11 cents to $5.06 per million BTUs (MMBtu).<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/19/large-price-gap-between-oil-and-natural-gas-persists/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Large Price Gap Between Oil and Natural Gas Persists</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/19/large-price-gap-between-oil-and-natural-gas-persists/">Large Price Gap Between Oil and Natural Gas Persists</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 19 Feb 2010 17:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/19/large-price-gap-between-oil-and-natural-gas-persists/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19365816/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/19/large-price-gap-between-oil-and-natural-gas-persists/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><category>natural gas</category><category>natural gas prices</category><category>oil prices</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Oil and natural gas: The tango continues]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/oil-and-natural-gas-the-tango-continues/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/oil-and-natural-gas-the-tango-continues/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/oil-and-natural-gas-the-tango-continues/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/07/rsz_refinery.jpg" alt="" />Something's got to give regarding the price disparity between oil and natural gas.</p>
<p>Natural gas, although off its lows for the year, is still cheap at about $4.85 per million Btus (MMBtu), largely due to record stock piles, as a result of the U.S. recession and probable increased reserves in the years ahead, stemming from shale gas.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/oil-and-natural-gas-the-tango-continues/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Oil and natural gas: The tango continues</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/oil-and-natural-gas-the-tango-continues/">Oil and natural gas: The tango continues</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/oil-and-natural-gas-the-tango-continues/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19201571/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/oil-and-natural-gas-the-tango-continues/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>natural gas prices</category><category>oil prices</category><category>shale gas</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[While oil flies high at $72, natural gas hits a 7-year low]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/20/while-oil-flies-high-at-72-natural-gas-hits-a-7-year-low/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/20/while-oil-flies-high-at-72-natural-gas-hits-a-7-year-low/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/20/while-oil-flies-high-at-72-natural-gas-hits-a-7-year-low/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/03/indigoprime.jpg" alt="" />Go figure the energy markets. Oil, which despite the U.S.'s worst recession in more than a generation, never really approached its <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Oil_Prices_1861_2007.svg">150-year real average</a> of $25-30, is trading around $72 per barrel. <br /><br />Meanwhile, a prime competitor, natural gas, hit a 7-year low Thursday, falling through the psychologically-significant <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&amp;sid=a.WiI3FN2ePo">$3 per million BTUs (MMBtu) level</a> on rising supplies and low demand from industry and power plants.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/20/while-oil-flies-high-at-72-natural-gas-hits-a-7-year-low/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>While oil flies high at $72, natural gas hits a 7-year low</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/20/while-oil-flies-high-at-72-natural-gas-hits-a-7-year-low/">While oil flies high at $72, natural gas hits a 7-year low</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 20 Aug 2009 17:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/20/while-oil-flies-high-at-72-natural-gas-hits-a-7-year-low/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19135753/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/20/while-oil-flies-high-at-72-natural-gas-hits-a-7-year-low/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>natural gas</category><category>natural gas prices</category><category>oil prices</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 17:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Traders anticipate a bull move in natural gas]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/20/traders-anticipate-a-bull-move-in-natural-gas/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/20/traders-anticipate-a-bull-move-in-natural-gas/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/20/traders-anticipate-a-bull-move-in-natural-gas/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/02/thermostat-temperature-honeywell-325472-l.jpg" width="220" height="160" />Last year when crude oil prices rose to $147.00 per barrel, many homeowners and businesses converted from oil to natural gas.</p>
<p>On Wednesday, U.S. <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/e8a82d0e-8cee-11de-a540-00144feabdc0.html">gas futures fell</a> to $3.049 per mBtu, the lowest in seven years, as the market remains oversupplied.</p>
<p>Now enters a large unknown hedge fund that spent millions buying $10.00 January and February call options. The options give buyers the right to purchase natural gas at $10.00 per million BTUs.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/20/traders-anticipate-a-bull-move-in-natural-gas/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Traders anticipate a bull move in natural gas</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/20/traders-anticipate-a-bull-move-in-natural-gas/">Traders anticipate a bull move in natural gas</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 20 Aug 2009 12:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/20/traders-anticipate-a-bull-move-in-natural-gas/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19135146/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/20/traders-anticipate-a-bull-move-in-natural-gas/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>futures</category><category>inthenews</category><category>natural gas prices</category><category>oil prices</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 12:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[In France, nuclear power has never gone out of style]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/23/in-france-nuclear-power-has-never-gone-out-of-style/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/23/in-france-nuclear-power-has-never-gone-out-of-style/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/23/in-france-nuclear-power-has-never-gone-out-of-style/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a></p><p><img height="160" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/nuclear.jpg" width="220" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" /> The United States is a nation whose electric power generation system and grid is becoming increasing inadequate, even as the nation grapples with another energy problem -- the $4 per gallon gasoline era. </p>
<p>Moreover, an economic slowdown and a relatively mild summer have to-date reduced the typical electric load electric power generation plants would face, but that respite will end when the U.S. economy starts to expand at a healthy rate again. And when it does, electric power demand will increase.</p>
<p>What's one model the United States could follow to generate more electricity while the same time reducing coal-based pollution and climate change? <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_power_in_France">France</a>.</p>
<p>That's right: France. Nuclear power is experiencing a mild comeback in the United States, with 34 new reactor applications on file at the U.S.'s Nuclear Regulatory Agency. In France, it never left. Further, had the United States followed the French model, the U.S. would be vastly more energy self-sufficient today.</p>
<p><strong>France: liberty, fraternity, equality, fission</strong></p>
<p>Nuclear power never went out of style in France, and for this reason France is decades ahead of the United States -- and much of the world, for that matter -- regarding <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/17/world/europe/17francenuke.html?_r=1&amp;ref=world&amp;oref=slogin">energy self-sufficiency</a>, <span style="FONT-STYLE: italic">The New York Times</span> reported. An astounding 77% of France's electricity comes from its 58 nuclear power plants, and it is a net-exporter of electricity to Europe. The United States has 104 nuclear power plants, which account for only <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/17/world/europe/17francenuke.html?_r=1&amp;ref=world&amp;oref=slogin">19.4% of its generated electricity</a>, according to U.S. Department of Energy data, <span style="FONT-STYLE: italic">The Times</span> reported.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/23/in-france-nuclear-power-has-never-gone-out-of-style/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>In France, nuclear power has never gone out of style</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/23/in-france-nuclear-power-has-never-gone-out-of-style/">In France, nuclear power has never gone out of style</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 23 Aug 2008 16:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/23/in-france-nuclear-power-has-never-gone-out-of-style/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1293052/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/23/in-france-nuclear-power-has-never-gone-out-of-style/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>climate change</category><category>CO2</category><category>coal</category><category>electricity</category><category>EU</category><category>European Union</category><category>France</category><category>inthenews</category><category>natural gas prices</category><category>nuclear plants</category><category>nuclear power</category><category>oil prices</category><category>oil shock</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 16:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[China, India see nuclear energy as essential to electricity plan]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/24/china-india-see-nuclear-energy-as-essential-to-electricity-plan/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/24/china-india-see-nuclear-energy-as-essential-to-electricity-plan/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/24/china-india-see-nuclear-energy-as-essential-to-electricity-plan/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/launches/" rel="tag">Launches</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/india/" rel="tag">India</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/mandj98/2468396121/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/06/nuclear.jpg" /></a>That the developing and developed world will need considerably more electricity in the decades ahead would not surprise most investors / readers. <br /><br />That both economic zones can achieve this goal while adding a minimal amount of soot to the atmosphere, however, would. <br /><br />And the technology that will undoubtedly serve as a key energy-generation component in emerging markets' 21st century power grid? You guessed it: nuclear power -- the power generation form that has lagged in the United States for more than 20 years, due to environmental regulations.<br /><br /><strong>China, India push forward with plant plans</strong><br /><br />China and India are two emerging market nations that recognize that nuclear power is an essential part of meeting future electricity demand. Nuclear power will account for more than 5% of China's power output by 2020, <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&amp;sid=aTlHj4UoWSS8">Bloomberg News reported Monday</a>. Meanwhile, India will start three nuclear reactors this year.<br /> <br /> Economist Glen Langan said that while nuclear power is not, strictly speaking, a renewable energy, it has to be considered as part of the next-generation energy mix [along with wind and solar power] to meet the U.S.'s growing demand for electricity.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/24/china-india-see-nuclear-energy-as-essential-to-electricity-plan/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>China, India see nuclear energy as essential to electricity plan</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/24/china-india-see-nuclear-energy-as-essential-to-electricity-plan/">China, India see nuclear energy as essential to electricity plan</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 24 Jun 2008 12:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/24/china-india-see-nuclear-energy-as-essential-to-electricity-plan/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1234402/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/24/china-india-see-nuclear-energy-as-essential-to-electricity-plan/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>climate change</category><category>coal</category><category>COGEMA</category><category>COGEMA La Hague</category><category>electricity</category><category>emerging markets</category><category>EmergingMarkets</category><category>featured</category><category>France</category><category>natural gas prices</category><category>nuclear power</category><category>oil prices</category><category>power generation</category><category>solar energy</category><category>Tricastin</category><category>wind power</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 12:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Occidental Petroleum: Turn the oil shock to your advantage]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/06/occidental-petroleum-turn-the-oil-shock-to-your-advantage/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/06/occidental-petroleum-turn-the-oil-shock-to-your-advantage/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/06/occidental-petroleum-turn-the-oil-shock-to-your-advantage/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p>The record run of oil, already up a gaudy 400% since 2000, continues, with prices breaking through $122 per barrel on Tuesday, May 6, 2008. <br /><br />Meanwhile, gasoline prices, up about 20% in the past six months alone, and about 100% in the past four years, show few signs of moderating in the months ahead. <br /><br />It's the era of high oil/energy prices, and until a readily-available, affordable energy substitute is found and/or oil prices decline, the oil / oil services sector will be in demand, which bodes well for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/occidental-petroleum-corporation/oxy/nys">Occidental Petroleum Corporation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/occidental-petroleum-corporation/oxy/nys">OXY</a>).<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/06/occidental-petroleum-turn-the-oil-shock-to-your-advantage/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Occidental Petroleum: Turn the oil shock to your advantage</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/06/occidental-petroleum-turn-the-oil-shock-to-your-advantage/">Occidental Petroleum: Turn the oil shock to your advantage</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 06 May 2008 18:24:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/06/occidental-petroleum-turn-the-oil-shock-to-your-advantage/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1188245/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/06/occidental-petroleum-turn-the-oil-shock-to-your-advantage/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>gasoline</category><category>gasoline prices</category><category>natural gas</category><category>natural gas prices</category><category>Occidental Petroleum</category><category>oil</category><category>oil prices</category><category>oil sector</category><category>oil shock</category><category>oil stocks</category><category>OXY</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 18:24:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Oil closes at $102.59, a new record high]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/28/oil-closes-at-102-59-a-new-record-high/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/28/oil-closes-at-102-59-a-new-record-high/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/28/oil-closes-at-102-59-a-new-record-high/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p>Oil closed Thursday up $2.95 to $102.59 per barrel -- another record-high print close -- after a combination of geopolitical, production, and trading factors sent investors piling into crude oil futures as an investment/inflation hedge, <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=a3nQCExVHxPo&amp;refer=home">Bloomberg News reported Thursday.</a><br /><br />Earlier in the day <a href="http://www.nymex.com">oil</a> hit an intra-session high of $102.70 -- within 10 cents of the all-time high, in inflation-adjusted terms, of $102.80 per barrel set in April 1980. <br /><br />The other major energy commodities also rose. <a href="http://www.nymex.com">Heating oil</a> surged about 6 cents to $2.83 per gallon, <a href="http://www.nymex.com">unleaded gasoline</a> climbed about 2 cent to $2.49, and <a href="http://www.nymex.com">natural gas</a> rocketed 39 cents to $9.45 per million BTUs.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/28/oil-closes-at-102-59-a-new-record-high/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Oil closes at $102.59, a new record high</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/28/oil-closes-at-102-59-a-new-record-high/">Oil closes at $102.59, a new record high</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/28/oil-closes-at-102-59-a-new-record-high/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1127377/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/28/oil-closes-at-102-59-a-new-record-high/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>emerging markets</category><category>gasoline</category><category>gasoline prices</category><category>hedge funds</category><category>inflation</category><category>inventories</category><category>investment funds</category><category>Iraq</category><category>natural gas</category><category>natural gas prices</category><category>Nigeria</category><category>oil</category><category>oil prices</category><category>OPEC</category><category>Turkey</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:35:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Devon at this price level is nearly divine]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/25/devon-at-this-price-level-is-nearly-divine/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/25/devon-at-this-price-level-is-nearly-divine/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/25/devon-at-this-price-level-is-nearly-divine/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><br /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/devon-energy-corporation/dvn/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Devon Energy</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/devon-energy-corporation/dvn/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">DVN</a>) is an oil/natural gas exploration company, with operations in the U.S., Canada, and abroad.<br /><br />Readers of this space know that one argument forwarded here is that in the era of elevated energy prices, oil/natural gas companies are likely to remain promising plays for the foreseeable future, baring the discovery of a cheap, widely-available, alternative energy. And among oil/natural gas companies, Devon Energy is worth an evaluation.<br /><br />Analysts like DVN's sizable proved oil/gas reserves of 2.34 billion barrels of oil equivalent. Production volume should increase 4-5% in 2007 and 7-11% in 2008. Analysts also like Devon's strategy decision to sell international assets with lower growth prospects. Meanwhile, the company's overall costs remain reasonable.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/25/devon-at-this-price-level-is-nearly-divine/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Devon at this price level is nearly divine</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/25/devon-at-this-price-level-is-nearly-divine/">Devon at this price level is nearly divine</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 25 Jan 2008 13:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/25/devon-at-this-price-level-is-nearly-divine/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1096217/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/25/devon-at-this-price-level-is-nearly-divine/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Devon Energy</category><category>DevonEnergy</category><category>DVN</category><category>natural gas</category><category>natural gas prices</category><category>NaturalGas</category><category>NaturalGasPrices</category><category>oil</category><category>oil prices</category><category>oil stocks</category><category>OilPrices</category><category>OilStocks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 13:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Oil falls below $90 as inventories rise, yet IEA maintains demand estimate]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/16/oil-falls-below-90-as-inventories-rise-iea-maintains-demand-es/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/16/oil-falls-below-90-as-inventories-rise-iea-maintains-demand-es/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/16/oil-falls-below-90-as-inventories-rise-iea-maintains-demand-es/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p>Oil plummeted $2.38 to $89.52 in early trading Wednesday after the <a href="http://www.eia.doe.gov/pub/oil_gas/petroleum/data_publications/weekly_petroleum_status_report/current/txt/wpsr.txt">U.S. Energy Information Agency announced</a> that weekly crude oil inventories rose 4.3 million barrels to 287.1 million barrels, well above the 1.25 million barrel increase consensus estimate. <br /><br /><a href="http://www.nymex.com">Heating oil</a> fell 4 cents to $2.49, <a href="http://www.nymex.com">unleaded gasoline</a> fell about 5 cents to $2.26, and <a href="http://www.nymex.com">natural gas</a> fell about 4 cents to $8.15 per million BTUs.<br /><br />However, despite the prospect of a U.S. recession that could lower oil demand, the International Energy Agency maintained its 2008 global oil demand forecast at 87.8 million barrels per day, a 2.3% increase from 2007, the organization announced Wednesday <a href="http://omrpublic.iea.org/">in a statement.</a><br /><br />Still, the IEA qualified its 2008 oil demand projection by saying the estimate would be adjusted downward if evidence indicated the U.S. economy continues to slow.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/16/oil-falls-below-90-as-inventories-rise-iea-maintains-demand-es/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Oil falls below $90 as inventories rise, yet IEA maintains demand estimate</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/16/oil-falls-below-90-as-inventories-rise-iea-maintains-demand-es/">Oil falls below $90 as inventories rise, yet IEA maintains demand estimate</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:06:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/16/oil-falls-below-90-as-inventories-rise-iea-maintains-demand-es/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1088325/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/16/oil-falls-below-90-as-inventories-rise-iea-maintains-demand-es/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>emerging markets</category><category>gasoline</category><category>gasoline prices</category><category>global oil demand</category><category>global oil supply</category><category>heating oil</category><category>HeatingOilPrices</category><category>International Energy Agency</category><category>inthenews</category><category>natural gas</category><category>natural gas prices</category><category>NaturalGas</category><category>NaturalGasPrices</category><category>OECD</category><category>oil</category><category>oil prices</category><category>recession</category><category>U.S. economy</category><category>U.S. Energy Information Agency</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:06:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ultra Petroleum (UPL) is well-positioned in a preferred energy form]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/14/ultra-petroleum-is-well-positioned-in-a-preferred-energy-form/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/14/ultra-petroleum-is-well-positioned-in-a-preferred-energy-form/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/14/ultra-petroleum-is-well-positioned-in-a-preferred-energy-form/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p>Readers of this space know that one argument forwarded here is that in the era of elevated energy prices, oil and natural gas companies are likely to remain promising plays for the foreseeable future, barring the discovery of a cheap, widely available, alternative energy. And among oil/natural gas companies, Ultra Petroleum is worth an evaluation.<br /><br /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ultra-petroleum-corporation/upl/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Ultra Petroleum</a> (AMEX: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/ultra-petroleum-corporation/upl/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">UPL</a>) is in independent oil/natural gas company with core properties in the Green River Basin of southwest Wyoming <br /><br />Analysts like UPL's proven reserves of 2.4 trillion cubic feet of natural gas equivalent, modest cost structure, adequate-to-good pricing power and likely production increases. The latter stems from the start of operations at the Rocky Express Pipeline in 2008, among other efforts. Further, look for UPL to attract increased attention from investors as the value and benefits of natural gas rise amid continued high oil prices. <a href="http://stocks.us.reuters.com/stocks/estimates.asp?symbol=upl">The Reuters F2007/F2008 EPS consensus estimates</a> for UPL are $1.29/$2.37.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/14/ultra-petroleum-is-well-positioned-in-a-preferred-energy-form/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ultra Petroleum (UPL) is well-positioned in a preferred energy form</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/14/ultra-petroleum-is-well-positioned-in-a-preferred-energy-form/">Ultra Petroleum (UPL) is well-positioned in a preferred energy form</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 14 Jan 2008 17:23:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/14/ultra-petroleum-is-well-positioned-in-a-preferred-energy-form/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1085859/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/14/ultra-petroleum-is-well-positioned-in-a-preferred-energy-form/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>energy sector</category><category>natural gas</category><category>natural gas exploration</category><category>natural gas prices</category><category>oil</category><category>oil prices</category><category>Ultra Petroleum</category><category>UPL</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 17:23:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Lower temperatures may push oil higher]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/26/lower-temps-may-push-oil-higher/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/26/lower-temps-may-push-oil-higher/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/26/lower-temps-may-push-oil-higher/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xom/" rel="tag">Exxon Mobil (XOM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cvx/" rel="tag">Chevron Corp (CVX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cop/" rel="tag">ConocoPhillips (COP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bp/" rel="tag">BP p.l.c. ADS (BP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/10/risingoil.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" />Oil pressured $99 per barrel before easing back in Monday morning trading, as traders anticipated another bullish week for oil prices with the winter season approaching. <br /><br />Jim Dietz, an independent energy trader, told BloggingStocks that weather will begin to play a larger factor in the oil markets.<br /><br />"Up until now it's been emerging market demand, gasoline use, geopolitical concerns, and the falling dollar that's been supporting oil's price. Now that colder temperatures are here, the winter season will begin to act as a support for prices," Dietz said. "Not that the other factors have disappeared, it's just that we'll watch heating oil's price. Heating oil supplies are O.K. right now, but if heating oil climbs, it will force the price of crude oil higher." <br /><br />In the U.S., heating oil and crude oil demand peaks during the December-February period, the Northern Hemisphere winter.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/markets/commodities/cfutures.html">Heating oil</a> rose about 1 cent to $2.71 per gallon, <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/markets/commodities/cfutures.html">unleaded gasoline</a> gained about 1 cent to $2.47 per gallon, and <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/markets/commodities/cfutures.html">natural gas</a> climbed $0.245 to $7.946 per million but in Monday morning trading.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/26/lower-temps-may-push-oil-higher/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Lower temperatures may push oil higher</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/26/lower-temps-may-push-oil-higher/">Lower temperatures may push oil higher</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 26 Nov 2007 10:13:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/26/lower-temps-may-push-oil-higher/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1047871/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/26/lower-temps-may-push-oil-higher/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>commodities</category><category>featured</category><category>gasoline</category><category>gasoline prices</category><category>heating oil</category><category>heating oil prices</category><category>natural gas</category><category>natural gas prices</category><category>oil</category><category>oil prices</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 10:13:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Oil flat after hitting record $99.29 a barrel]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/21/oil-flat-after-hitting-record-99-29-bbl/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/21/oil-flat-after-hitting-record-99-29-bbl/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/21/oil-flat-after-hitting-record-99-29-bbl/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xom/" rel="tag">Exxon Mobil (XOM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cvx/" rel="tag">Chevron Corp (CVX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cop/" rel="tag">ConocoPhillips (COP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bp/" rel="tag">BP p.l.c. ADS (BP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a></p>Crude oil was <a href="http://www.nymex.com/index.aspx">virtually unchanged at $98.02</a> Wednesday at midday, as traders took a wait-and-see approach following <a href="http://www.eia.doe.gov/oil_gas/petroleum/data_publications/weekly_petroleum_status_report/wpsr.html">a 1.07-million-barrel drop</a> in weekly crude inventories for the week ending November 16 . <br /><br />Analysts had expected an 800,000-barrel inventory gain, hence Wednesday's draw down struck some traders as an anomaly, perhaps attributable to thinner trading conditions ahead of the [U.S.] Thanksgiving Day holiday. <br /><br />Earlier, crude oil had reached a record $99.29 per barrel in electronic trading. <br /><br /><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/markets/commodities/cfutures.html">Heating oil</a> gained about 2 cents to $2.70 and <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/markets/commodities/cfutures.html">unleaded gasoline</a> rose about 1 cent to $2.45. <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/markets/commodities/cfutures.html">Natural gas</a> dropped 0.007 to $7.470 per million BTUs.<br /><br /><strong>Oil Analysis:</strong> Fundamental and technical indicators continue to favor an oil price move toward and beyond $100 per barrel, although Wednesday's thin trading conditions will make it harder to clear the $100 hurdle today, than in a normal trading volume session. Further, traders underscored that no factors have appeared that suggest the oil-higher trend is set to end.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/21/oil-flat-after-hitting-record-99-29-bbl/">Oil flat after hitting record $99.29 a barrel</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 21 Nov 2007 14:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.eia.doe.gov/oil_gas/petroleum/data_publications/weekly_petroleum_status_report/wpsr.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/21/oil-flat-after-hitting-record-99-29-bbl/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1045508/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/21/oil-flat-after-hitting-record-99-29-bbl/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>energy</category><category>gasoline</category><category>gasoline prices</category><category>heating oil</category><category>heating oil prices</category><category>imports</category><category>inthenews</category><category>natural gas</category><category>natural gas prices</category><category>NYMEX</category><category>oil</category><category>oil inventories</category><category>oil prices</category><category>oil production</category><category>OPEC</category><category>trade deficit</category><category>U.S. Energy Information Administration</category><category>U.s.EnergyInformationAdministration</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 14:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Investing in Oklahoma: Arena Resources (ARD), Chesapeake Energy (CHK), ONEOK (OKE) and others]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/14/investing-in-oklahoma-arena-resources-ard-chesapeake-energy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/14/investing-in-oklahoma-arena-resources-ard-chesapeake-energy/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/14/investing-in-oklahoma-arena-resources-ard-chesapeake-energy/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/chk/" rel="tag">Chesapeake Energy (CHK)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p><p>Oklahoma celebrates its centennial in November -- Happy Birthday, Oklahoma!</p>
<p>Today, Oklahoma is known as one of the most business-friendly states, due in part to low tax rates. Oklahoma's economy is based largely on the energy, aviation, and food processing sectors. From 2000 to 2006, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oklahoma">Oklahoma's gross domestic product</a> increased 50 percent. The GDP per capita grew almost 10 percent between 2005 and 2006, one of the highest rates in the nation.</p>
<p>Fortune magazine's <a href="http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortunefastestgrowing/2007/states/OK.html">2007 list of the fastest growing companies</a> in the U.S. included six from Oklahoma. At number three on the list was Tulsa-based <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/arena-resources-inc/ard/nys">Arena Resources Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/arena-resources-inc/ard/nys">ARD</a>), a seven-year old oil and gas firm with a three-year annual growth rate of 165 percent. Back in August, Arena announced <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/arena-resources-announces-second-quarter/n20070807095709990022">strong second quarter 2007</a> financial and operating results. Arena is also a major holding in the Bruce Fund, which recently made the <a href="http://www.forbes.com/business/free_forbes/2007/0917/170.html?partner=aolmag">2007 Forbes Honor Roll.</a></p>
<p>Tulsa-based oil and gas driller <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/helmerich-and-38-payne-inc/hp/nys">Helmerich &amp; Payne Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/helmerich-and-38-payne-inc/hp/nys">HP</a>) had a three-year annual growth rate of 37 percent, which beat the S&amp;P 500. In August, H&amp;P announced <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/helmerich-and-payne-inc-announces/n20070801085109990026">strong second quarter 2007 results</a>, as well as two new contracts. The Motley Fool sees expansion in other sectors as <a href="http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2007/09/12/cvrd-going-gas-hunting.aspx">good news for drillers</a> such as H&amp;P.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/14/investing-in-oklahoma-arena-resources-ard-chesapeake-energy/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Investing in Oklahoma: Arena Resources (ARD), Chesapeake Energy (CHK), ONEOK (OKE) and others</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/14/investing-in-oklahoma-arena-resources-ard-chesapeake-energy/">Investing in Oklahoma: Arena Resources (ARD), Chesapeake Energy (CHK), ONEOK (OKE) and others</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 14 Sep 2007 18:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/14/investing-in-oklahoma-arena-resources-ard-chesapeake-energy/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/989952/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/14/investing-in-oklahoma-arena-resources-ard-chesapeake-energy/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ARD</category><category>Arena Resources</category><category>Bruce Fund</category><category>Chesapeake Energy</category><category>CHK</category><category>Devon Energy</category><category>energy sector</category><category>Helmerich and Payne</category><category>HP</category><category>Lenny Dykstra</category><category>natural gas</category><category>natural gas prices</category><category>OKE</category><category>Oklahoma</category><category>Oklahoma City</category><category>ONEOK</category><category>Tulsa</category><category>Unit Corp.</category><category>UNT</category><category>Williams Companies</category><category>Williams Pipeline</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trey Thoelcke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 18:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Top 20 advisors: Chris Mayer sees low risk with ROSE]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/26/top-20-advisors-chris-mayer-sees-low-risk-with-rose/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/26/top-20-advisors-chris-mayer-sees-low-risk-with-rose/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/26/top-20-advisors-chris-mayer-sees-low-risk-with-rose/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newsletters/" rel="tag">Newsletters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ETF-Investing/" rel="tag">ETF Investing</a></p><p><em>Last December, over 100 stocks were featured in our <strong>Top Picks for 2007</strong> report. Now, at mid-year, we turn to the 20 advisors whose picks showed the strongest gains to get an update on their previous picks, as well as a new favorite stock for the second half of the year.</em></p>
<p><strong>Chris Mayer</strong>, editor of <a href="http://www.thestockadvisors.com/ccount/click.php?id=963">Capital &amp; Crisis</a>, chose <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/rosetta-resources-inc/rose/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Rosetta Resources Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/rosetta-resources-inc/rose/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">ROSE</a>) as his top pick for 2007. The stock rose 32%, as of June 1, 2007. <em>Here is Chris's </em><em><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/29/top-picks-2007-chris-mayer-uncovers-rosetta/">original recommendation</a></em><em> for Rosetta and his <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/22/top-20-advisors-chris-mayer-fills-up-with-national-fuel/">new favorite stock</a> for the rest of 2007.</em></p>
<p>Updating Rosetta, the advisor now says, "I continue to like ROSE, which should increase production greatly this year. The company is in good financial shape. It still has a relatively low-risk portfolio of drilling projects.</p>
<p>"I also feel good about the future of natural gas prices. In a world where we're draining the conventional natural gas wells at a fast rate, large fields of relatively untapped gas potential in the lower 48 are going to be worth a lot. Rosetta has that in its Rio Vista interests.</p>
<p>The company also keeps blowing away estimates. In the March quarter, earnings came in 33% better than analysts expected. In December, they beat the consensus by 24%. All of this and it still trades for a reasonable multiple -- only 14 times next year's (too low) estimate."</p>
<em>
<p><em>See <a href="http://www.thestockadvisors.com/top2007-2/">all 20 stocks the advisors picked for the second half of 2007</a></em>.</p>
</em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/26/top-20-advisors-chris-mayer-sees-low-risk-with-rose/">Top 20 advisors: Chris Mayer sees low risk with ROSE</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 26 Jun 2007 10:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/26/top-20-advisors-chris-mayer-sees-low-risk-with-rose/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/918345/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/26/top-20-advisors-chris-mayer-sees-low-risk-with-rose/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Chris Mayer</category><category>ChrisMayer</category><category>favorite stocks</category><category>financial newsletter advisors</category><category>natural gas prices</category><category>Rio Vista</category><category>RioVista</category><category>ROSE</category><category>Rosetta</category><category>Rosetta Resources</category><category>RosettaResources</category><category>steven halpern</category><category>thestockadvisors.com</category><category>Top Picks 2007</category><category>top stock picks</category><category>TopPicks2007</category><category>TopStockPicks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Halpern]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 10:35:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
