The "Net Neutrality" debate is confusing, and I'm not the only one who thinks so. Andy Kessler from The Weekly Standard calls the issue "bizarre" and "hard to understand" and opines: "both sides are off their rocker." He argues that the answer is not regulation. The telcos and cable companies, he says, are loathe to upgrade their networks -- it's expensive, and, why would they without the government stepping in? They want neutrality regulations to be quelled because "without the ability to extract money from the webbies for the use of their not-so-fast Alexander Graham Bell-era wires (forget that you and I already overpay for this), AT&T or Verizon might not have any business model going forward."

Kessler's "modest proposal" is creative and a little diabolical (ergo: I love it). "Maybe the incumbent network providers--the Verizons, Comcasts, AT&Ts--can be made to compete; threatening to seize their stagnating networks via eminent domain is just one creative idea to get them to do this. A truly competitive, non-neutral network could work, but only if we know its real economic value. If telcos or cable charge too much, someone should be in a position to steal the customer. Maybe then we'd see useful services and a better Internet. Sounds like capitalism."

What does the blogerati think about the idea of seizing broadband in the name of eminent domain?

Meg Whitman swung the massive club of her one million-plus eBay membership today, calling on each of them individually to get involved in the net neutrality debate in a personally-addressed email. She argued against the doctrine of "pay to play" to use the "fast lane" of the internet and said, "The bottom tier -- the slow lane -- would be what is left for everyone else. If the fast lane is the information 'super-highway,' the slow lane will operate more like a dirt road." Her missive asked each member to follow a link to send an email to their congressperson.

The debate, which pitches the internet backbone providers (like Comcast, Verizon and Time Warner's cable unit) against the biggest bandwidth users (like eBay, Google, Amazon.com, Microsoft and Yahoo!) is growing more bitter by the minute. Whitman's atypical move of sending email to her many members is seen as an unconventional approach in a battle that, to date, has failed to explain itself well to voters; although investors, certainly, can understand that the potential for huge profits hang in the balance.