<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Net Neutrality: 'both sides are off their rocker']]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/19/net-neutrality-both-sides-are-off-their-rocker/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/19/net-neutrality-both-sides-are-off-their-rocker/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/19/net-neutrality-both-sides-are-off-their-rocker/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ebay/" rel="tag">eBay (EBAY)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/insider-blogging/" rel="tag">Insider Blogging</a></p><p>The <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/search/?q=neutrality">"Net Neutrality" debate</a> is confusing, and <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/24/mike-mccurry-the-internet-is-doomed-craig-newmark-disagrees/">I'm not the only one who thinks so</a>. <a href="http://www.weeklystandard.com/Utilities/printer_preview.asp?idArticle=12348&amp;R=ECCBA034">Andy Kessler from <em>The Weekly Standard</em> calls the issue</a> "bizarre" and "hard to understand" and opines: "both sides are off their rocker." He argues that the answer is not regulation. The telcos and cable companies, he says, are loathe to upgrade their networks -- it's expensive, and, why would they without the government stepping in? They want neutrality regulations&nbsp;to be quelled because "without the ability to extract money from the webbies for the use of their not-so-fast Alexander Graham Bell-era wires (forget that you and I already overpay for this), AT&amp;T or Verizon might not have <em>any</em> business model going forward."</p>
<p>Kessler's "modest proposal" is creative and a little diabolical (ergo: I love it). "Maybe the incumbent network providers--the Verizons, Comcasts, AT&amp;Ts--can be made to compete; threatening to seize their stagnating networks via eminent domain is just one creative idea to get them to do this. A truly competitive, non-neutral network could work, but only if we know its real economic value. If telcos or cable charge too much, someone should be in a position to steal the customer. Maybe then we'd see useful services and a better Internet. Sounds like capitalism."</p>
<p>What does the blogerati think about the idea of seizing broadband in the name of eminent domain? </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/19/net-neutrality-both-sides-are-off-their-rocker/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Net Neutrality: 'both sides are off their rocker'</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/19/net-neutrality-both-sides-are-off-their-rocker/">Net Neutrality: 'both sides are off their rocker'</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 19 Jun 2006 15:12:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.weeklystandard.com/Utilities/printer_preview.asp?idArticle=12348&amp;R=ECCBA034>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/19/net-neutrality-both-sides-are-off-their-rocker/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/634722/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/19/net-neutrality-both-sides-are-off-their-rocker/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>andy kessler</category><category>AndyKessler</category><category>domain</category><category>eminent</category><category>eminent domain</category><category>EminentDomain</category><category>kessler</category><category>mike from techdirt</category><category>MikeFromTechdirt</category><category>net neutrality</category><category>net neutrality debate</category><category>NetNeutrality</category><category>NetNeutralityDebate</category><category>neutrality</category><category>techdirt</category><category>telcos</category><category>the weekly standard</category><category>TheWeeklyStandard</category><category>weekly standard</category><category>WeeklyStandard</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2006 15:12:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[eBay diving into net neutrality: the million-member email]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/02/ebay-diving-into-net-neutrality-the-million-member-email/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/02/ebay-diving-into-net-neutrality-the-million-member-email/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/02/ebay-diving-into-net-neutrality-the-million-member-email/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ebay/" rel="tag">eBay (EBAY)</a></p><p><img alt="email from meg" hspace="4" src="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/06/ebay_email_meg.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />Meg Whitman swung the massive club of her one million-plus eBay membership today, calling on each of them individually to get involved in the net neutrality debate in a personally-addressed email. She argued against the doctrine of "pay to play" to use the "fast lane" of the internet&nbsp;and said, "The bottom tier -- the slow lane -- would be what is left for everyone else. If the fast lane is the information 'super-highway,' the slow lane will operate more like a dirt road." Her missive asked each member to follow a link to send an email to their congressperson.</p>
<p>The debate, which pitches the internet backbone providers (like Comcast, Verizon and Time Warner's cable unit) against the biggest bandwidth users (like eBay, Google, Amazon.com, Microsoft&nbsp;and Yahoo!) is growing more bitter by the minute. Whitman's&nbsp;atypical move of sending email to her many members is seen as an unconventional approach in a <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/24/mike-mccurry-the-internet-is-doomed-craig-newmark-disagrees/">battle that, to date, has failed to explain itself well to voters</a>; although investors, certainly, can understand that the potential for huge profits hang in the balance.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/02/ebay-diving-into-net-neutrality-the-million-member-email/">eBay diving into net neutrality: the million-member email</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 02 Jun 2006 18:43:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://news.com.com/2100-1028_3-6079291.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/02/ebay-diving-into-net-neutrality-the-million-member-email/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/624494/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/02/ebay-diving-into-net-neutrality-the-million-member-email/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ceo</category><category>ebay</category><category>ebay ceo</category><category>ebay email</category><category>EbayCeo</category><category>EbayEmail</category><category>meg</category><category>meg whitman</category><category>MegWhitman</category><category>net neutrality</category><category>NetNeutrality</category><category>neutrality</category><category>whitman</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 18:43:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
