<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Gannett Down Big After Earnings Report]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/15/gannett-down-big-after-earnings-report/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/15/gannett-down-big-after-earnings-report/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/15/gannett-down-big-after-earnings-report/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gci/" rel="tag">Gannett Co (GCI)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="Gannett (GCI) logo"  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/10/gannettlogo.jpg" />Gannett (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/gannett-inc-del/gci/nys">GCI</a>) is off following the release of its third-quarter numbers. With about one hour to go before the regular session ends, shares of the newspaper entity are down nearly 10% to $12.69. Volume is extremely strong. </p>
<p>At least the stock isn't in 52-week-low territory. It would have to be closer to $9.53 for that to be the case. Still, the 52-week high is $19.69, so it's a far distance from that level as well. And as for the <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/charts/gannett-inc-del/gci/nys/tech-chart">one-year chart</a>, you can see that the company has been on a downtrend since April.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/15/gannett-down-big-after-earnings-report/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Gannett Down Big After Earnings Report</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/15/gannett-down-big-after-earnings-report/">Gannett Down Big After Earnings Report</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 15 Oct 2010 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.dailyfinance.com/article/gannett-posts-jump-in-3q-profit/572572/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/15/gannett-down-big-after-earnings-report/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19676057/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/15/gannett-down-big-after-earnings-report/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>gannett</category><category>Gannett earnings</category><category>GCI</category><category>inthenews</category><category>newspaper industry</category><category>usa today</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google CEO Schmidt: We See Profits in the Newspaper Industry Again]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/12/google-ceo-schmidt-we-see-profits-in-the-newspaper-industry-aga/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/12/google-ceo-schmidt-we-see-profits-in-the-newspaper-industry-aga/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/12/google-ceo-schmidt-we-see-profits-in-the-newspaper-industry-aga/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/google-logo-240.gif" alt="" />Google (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) has been the bain of the publishing industry -- both printed and  <span style="float: left; margin-right: 10px; margin-top: 7px;"><script> digg_url = 'http://digg.com/business_finance/Google_CEO_Schmidt_We_See_Profits_in_the_Newspaper_Industry'; </script> <script src=" http://digg.com/api/diggthis.js"></script></span> electronic -- for years. Its Google Books project scans books by the hundreds in order to make the content accessible online and for free. Have a newspaper website? Google probably scans it daily to aggregate pieces of your content at Google News (again, for free). Google CEO Eric Schmidt, though, thinks that newspapers can follow the Google model and make money using their content online, and not hide everything behind a pay wall.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/12/google-ceo-schmidt-we-see-profits-in-the-newspaper-industry-aga/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Google CEO Schmidt: We See Profits in the Newspaper Industry Again</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/12/google-ceo-schmidt-we-see-profits-in-the-newspaper-industry-aga/">Google CEO Schmidt: We See Profits in the Newspaper Industry Again</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-20002227-93.html?tag=newsEditorsPicksArea.0>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/12/google-ceo-schmidt-we-see-profits-in-the-newspaper-industry-aga/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19435505/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/04/12/google-ceo-schmidt-we-see-profits-in-the-newspaper-industry-aga/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Eric Schmidt</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>Google CEO</category><category>inthenews</category><category>newspaper industry</category><category>newspapers</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 15:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Newsday Shows Future of Online Subscription Model]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/27/newsday-shows-future-of-online-subscription-model/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/27/newsday-shows-future-of-online-subscription-model/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/27/newsday-shows-future-of-online-subscription-model/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/newsdaycom-logo.jpg" alt="" />The recent announcement by the <em>New York Times</em> (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys" target="_blank">NYT</a>) that it would start to require subscriptions next year has drawn no shortage of attention and commentary. It has tried to put content behind a pay wall before (and failed), as have other newspapers.</p>
<p>Almost universally, newspapers have struggled with online subscriptions, with the <em>Financial Times</em> and <em>Wall Street Journal</em>, a News Corp (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas" target="_blank">NWS</a>) property, the only two that have really delivered results better than awful. Whether the <em>New York Times</em> can operate at that level is in doubt, particularly given the stunning realization about Long Island daily newspaper <em>Newsday</em>.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/27/newsday-shows-future-of-online-subscription-model/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Newsday Shows Future of Online Subscription Model</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/27/newsday-shows-future-of-online-subscription-model/">Newsday Shows Future of Online Subscription Model</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 27 Jan 2010 11:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.observer.com/2010/media/after-three-months-only-35-subscriptions-newsdays-web-site>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/27/newsday-shows-future-of-online-subscription-model/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19333529/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/27/newsday-shows-future-of-online-subscription-model/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>financial times</category><category>inthenews</category><category>long island</category><category>media</category><category>new york times co.</category><category>news corp</category><category>news corporation</category><category>newsday</category><category>newspaper industry</category><category>newspapers</category><category>NewYorkTimes</category><category>NWS</category><category>nyt</category><category>nytimes</category><category>Optimum</category><category>wall street journal</category><category>wsj</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 11:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[New York Times Online Business Model Could Be Only Days Away]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/18/new-york-times-online-business-model-could-be-only-days-away/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/18/new-york-times-online-business-model-could-be-only-days-away/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/18/new-york-times-online-business-model-could-be-only-days-away/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/new-york-times-logo-200.jpg" />The <em>New York Times</em> (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys" target="_blank">NYT</a>) has been struggling to figure out the web, which has led to a debate over whether to charge for electrons that has spanned years. Well, the Times seems likely to take the plunge, hoping to replicate the successes of the <a href="http://www.ft.com" target="_blank"><em>Financial Times</em></a> and <em><a href="http://www.wsj.com">Wall Street Journal</a></em> ... except, of course, that the <a><em>Wall Street Journal</em></a><em> </em>is famous for not really delivering profits. Fortunately, the new pay wall is expected to look more like the <em>Financial Times </em>than the <em>Wall Street Journal</em>. The <a href="http://www.nytimes.com" target="_blank"><em>New York Times</em></a> is considering a "metered" system. Visitors will be able to read a certain number of articles free before being required to subscribe.</p>
<p>A friend of Arthur Sulzberger, according to <a href="http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2010/01/new_york_times_set_to_mimic_ws.html" target="_blank"><em>New York Magazine</em>'s Daily Intel</a>, said that the final word could come in a few days, a sentiment corroborated by a newsroom source who said that the plan could be announced within weeks. Yet, plans need to be implemented, so it could take months for the Times to begin charging for content.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/18/new-york-times-online-business-model-could-be-only-days-away/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>New York Times Online Business Model Could Be Only Days Away</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/18/new-york-times-online-business-model-could-be-only-days-away/">New York Times Online Business Model Could Be Only Days Away</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 18 Jan 2010 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/18/new-york-times-online-business-model-could-be-only-days-away/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19320705/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/18/new-york-times-online-business-model-could-be-only-days-away/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aapl</category><category>Apple</category><category>apple tablet</category><category>arthur sulzberger</category><category>featured</category><category>financial times</category><category>ft</category><category>FT.com</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>inthenews</category><category>maureen dowd</category><category>media</category><category>new york city</category><category>new york times</category><category>News Corp.</category><category>newspaper advertising</category><category>newspaper industry</category><category>newspapers</category><category>NWS</category><category>nyt</category><category>nytimes.com</category><category>online ads</category><category>online advertising</category><category>tablet</category><category>Tom Friedman</category><category>wall street journal</category><category>wsj</category><category>WSJ.com</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google to media: Your problems aren't our fault]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/04/google-to-media-your-problems-arent-our-fault/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/04/google-to-media-your-problems-arent-our-fault/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/04/google-to-media-your-problems-arent-our-fault/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/google-logo-200x150.jpg" alt="" />The newspaper industry continues to blame Google (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas" target="_blank">GOOG</a>) for its woes, and Google continues to claim its innocence. The search engine giant's CEO, Eric Schmidt, says that his company could actually help the newspaper industry survive the shift from print to digital ... a shift that's been more than a decade in the making, he was kind enough not to note.</p>
<p>According to Schmidt, <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE5B23ED20091203" target="_blank">publishers need to dig into the online environment and find new ways to generate revenue</a>. "With dwindling revenue and diminished resources," he wrote in an op-ed piece published in News Corp's (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas" target="_blank">NWS</a>) <em><a href="http://www.wsj.com" target="_blank">Wall Street Journal</a></em>, "frustrated newspaper executives are looking for someone to blame."<br /><br /></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/04/google-to-media-your-problems-arent-our-fault/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Google to media: Your problems aren't our fault</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/04/google-to-media-your-problems-arent-our-fault/">Google to media: Your problems aren't our fault</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 04 Dec 2009 11:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/04/google-to-media-your-problems-arent-our-fault/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19264949/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/04/google-to-media-your-problems-arent-our-fault/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>eric schmidt</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>inthenews</category><category>news corp</category><category>news corporation</category><category>NewsCorp</category><category>newspaper industry</category><category>newspapers</category><category>NWS</category><category>search engines</category><category>wall street journal</category><category>wsj</category><category>WSJ.com</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 11:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google gives newspapers what they want]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/02/google-gives-newspapers-what-they-want/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/02/google-gives-newspapers-what-they-want/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/02/google-gives-newspapers-what-they-want/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a></p><p><img  border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/google-logo-200x150.jpg" alt="" />Free content's getting locked down. Google (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas" target="_blank">GOOG</a>), which has been criticized by the newspaper industry for <strike>sending them traffic</strike> making it easy for readers to find the stories they want without forcing them to make a purchase, is <a href="http://blogs.usatoday.com/technologylive/2009/12/google-to-limit-free-newspaper-articles.html" target="_blank">starting to play ball with the print industry</a>. </p>
<p>What's the harm? The way things are going, Google will only have to be nice for a little while. Then, this latest defensive measure by the newspaper industry will have run its course, and Google will be free to do what it wants.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/02/google-gives-newspapers-what-they-want/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Google gives newspapers what they want</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/02/google-gives-newspapers-what-they-want/">Google gives newspapers what they want</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 02 Dec 2009 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/02/google-gives-newspapers-what-they-want/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19261078/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/02/google-gives-newspapers-what-they-want/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>GoogleNews</category><category>inthenews</category><category>News Corp.</category><category>NewsCorp.</category><category>newspaper industry</category><category>newspapers</category><category>NWS</category><category>rupert murdoch</category><category>wall street journal</category><category>wsj</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Looser auditing rules keeping some newspaper heads above water]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/23/looser-auditing-rules-keeping-some-newspaper-heads-above-water/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/23/looser-auditing-rules-keeping-some-newspaper-heads-above-water/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/23/looser-auditing-rules-keeping-some-newspaper-heads-above-water/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gci/" rel="tag">Gannett Co (GCI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><img hspace="4" height="175" border="1" align="right" width="200" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/10/coffee_stock.jpg" alt="" />Bundling is beautiful for newspapers. Since April 1, 2009, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34094479/ns/business-media_biz/">new rules for counting circulation have turned some newspapers from losing to gaining</a>, even in a market where the print community is getting thrashed. Instead of selling more copies every day, these publications are counting online visits, as long as they are from paying subscribers - for either protected portions of the website or digital replica editions.</p>
<p>The new auditing standards, which affect <em>USA Today</em>, a Gannet (<a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/gannett-inc-del/gci/nys">GCI</a>) property, and News Corp's (<a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas">NWS</a>) <em>Wall Street Journal</em>, among others, often allow newspapers that bundle print and digital editions to count the subscriber twice. According to a report by the Associated Press, the new rule is preventing circulation from looking as bad as it really may be.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/23/looser-auditing-rules-keeping-some-newspaper-heads-above-water/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Looser auditing rules keeping some newspaper heads above water</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/23/looser-auditing-rules-keeping-some-newspaper-heads-above-water/">Looser auditing rules keeping some newspaper heads above water</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34094479/ns/business-media_biz/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/23/looser-auditing-rules-keeping-some-newspaper-heads-above-water/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19249895/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/23/looser-auditing-rules-keeping-some-newspaper-heads-above-water/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>abc</category><category>audit bureau of circulations</category><category>circulation</category><category>GannettCo.</category><category>GCI</category><category>inthenews</category><category>news corp</category><category>news corporation</category><category>newspaper circulation</category><category>Newspaper circulation declines</category><category>newspaper industry</category><category>NewspaperCirculation</category><category>NewspaperCirculationDeclines</category><category>NewspaperIndustry</category><category>NWS</category><category>subscriptions</category><category>usa today</category><category>UsaToday</category><category>wall street journal</category><category>WallStreetJournal</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Newspaper ad revenue of 28%, 8 quarters of double-digit drops]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/newspaper-ad-revenue-of-28-8-quarters-of-double-digit-drops/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/newspaper-ad-revenue-of-28-8-quarters-of-double-digit-drops/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/newspaper-ad-revenue-of-28-8-quarters-of-double-digit-drops/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gci/" rel="tag">Gannett Co (GCI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><img border="1" align="right" width="200" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="163" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/teapaper.jpg" alt="" />We've put three quarters behind us in 2009, and the most recent one was merely another miserable step downward for the beleaguered newspaper industry. Total ad revenue plummeted in the third quarter to $6.4 billion for the print jockeys, a decline of 28%. <a href="http://www.naa.org/TrendsandNumbers/Advertising-Expenditures.aspx" target="_blank">This info from the Newspaper Association of America</a> drives home the notion that conditions will only worsen for the newspaper industry. So, if you're hoping those shares of New York Times Company (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys" target="_blank">NYT</a>), Gannett (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/gannett-inc-del/gci/nys" target="_blank">GCI</a>) and Washington Post Company (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-washington-post-company/wpo/nys" target="_blank">WPO</a>), holding your breath will leave you little more than dizzy.</p>
<p>Of the total advertising revenue generated in the third quarter of 2009, $5.8 million came from print, the lowest quarterly amount this year. The $623 million in online advertising sold by America's newspapers was also 2009's worst. Both are down substantially from the same quarter in 2008, when the newspapers posted print ad revenue of $8.2 million and online ad revenue of $750 million, according to NAA data. At this time last year, we lamented year-over-year declines approaching 20%. Now, we have the same feelings as ad revenue drops approach 30%.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/newspaper-ad-revenue-of-28-8-quarters-of-double-digit-drops/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Newspaper ad revenue of 28%, 8 quarters of double-digit drops</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/newspaper-ad-revenue-of-28-8-quarters-of-double-digit-drops/">Newspaper ad revenue of 28%, 8 quarters of double-digit drops</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/newspaper-ad-revenue-of-28-8-quarters-of-double-digit-drops/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19248391/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/newspaper-ad-revenue-of-28-8-quarters-of-double-digit-drops/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ad revenue</category><category>AdRevenue</category><category>advertising</category><category>featured</category><category>gannett</category><category>gannett co gci</category><category>GannettCo.</category><category>GannettCoGci</category><category>GCI</category><category>new york times</category><category>New York Times Co</category><category>new york times company</category><category>newspaper</category><category>newspaper advertising</category><category>newspaper association of america</category><category>newspaper industry</category><category>newspaper stocks</category><category>NewspaperAdvertising</category><category>NewspaperAssociationOfAmerica</category><category>NewspaperIndustry</category><category>newspapers</category><category>NewspaperStocks</category><category>NewYorkTimes</category><category>NewYorkTimesCo</category><category>NewYorkTimesCompany</category><category>nyt</category><category>online ads</category><category>online advertising</category><category>OnlineAds</category><category>OnlineAdvertising</category><category>print ads</category><category>print advertising</category><category>PrintAds</category><category>PrintAdvertising</category><category>washington post</category><category>Washington Post Co.</category><category>WashingtonPost</category><category>WashingtonPostCo.</category><category>WPO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[NYT News Service migrates after cut]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/nyt-news-service-migrates-after-cuts/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/nyt-news-service-migrates-after-cuts/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/nyt-news-service-migrates-after-cuts/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/07/nyt-new-york-times-logo.jpg" alt="" />This winter, a bit more of <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/NewYork/">New York</a> is headed to <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Florida/">Florida</a>. <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Layoffs/">Layoffs</a> for 2010 have already been announced for the New York Times Company(<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/13/business/media/13times.html?_r=1&amp;ref=media" target="_blank">NYT</a>). The New York Times News Service will lose 25 editorial positions next year and shift the service's editing to one of the parent company's Florida <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/newspapers/">newspapers</a>. At present, the news service has 30 editorial jobs. Some of the layoffs will occur in February, and the others will happen in May.</p>
<p>These layoffs are not included in the planned slashing of 100 jobs in the flagship newspaper's newsroom -- a workforce reduction of 8% that should take hold by the end of the year. The NY Times is also ceasing pension contributions for nonunion employees.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/nyt-news-service-migrates-after-cuts/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>NYT News Service migrates after cut</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/nyt-news-service-migrates-after-cuts/">NYT News Service migrates after cut</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/nyt-news-service-migrates-after-cuts/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19236718/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/nyt-news-service-migrates-after-cuts/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>gainesville</category><category>inthenews</category><category>layoffs</category><category>new york times</category><category>new york times co.</category><category>new york times company</category><category>newspaper industry</category><category>newspaper stocks</category><category>NewspaperIndustry</category><category>newspapers</category><category>NewspaperStocks</category><category>NewYorkTimes</category><category>NewYorkTimesCo.</category><category>NewYorkTimesCompany</category><category>nyt</category><category>nytimes</category><category>unions</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Boston Globe's Ainsley $1.2 million departure package]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/boston-globes-ainsley-1-2-million-departure-package/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/boston-globes-ainsley-1-2-million-departure-package/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/boston-globes-ainsley-1-2-million-departure-package/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/04/bostonglobelogo.gif" />It costs a fortune to cut fat. For regular people, it can mean hundreds or even thousands of dollars on gym memberships, special meals and organic restaurants. Yet, this pales in comparison to how much the Boston Globe is spending to lose some dead weight. It could cost the <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys">NY Times Co.</a> (NYSE: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys">NYT</a>) property more than $1.2 million to <a target="_blank" href="http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2009/10/29/boston-globe-publisher-retires-after-paper-nearly-dies/">bid adieu to the publisher that almost ran it into the ground</a>. </p>
<p>Steven Ainsley has announced that he's going to retire as publisher of the Globe after having been at the helm for three years. Though quite proud of the two Pulitzer Prizes the paper picked up under Ainsley, the announcement didn't include the fact that he almost caused the newspaper retire before him. As usual, the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/newspaper/">newspaper</a> is all too eager to talk about its awards, without even acknowledging the fact that it's on the brink of disaster.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/boston-globes-ainsley-1-2-million-departure-package/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Boston Globe's Ainsley $1.2 million departure package</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/boston-globes-ainsley-1-2-million-departure-package/">Boston Globe's Ainsley $1.2 million departure package</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 30 Oct 2009 08:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2009/10/29/boston-globe-publisher-retires-after-paper-nearly-dies/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/boston-globes-ainsley-1-2-million-departure-package/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19216355/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/boston-globes-ainsley-1-2-million-departure-package/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>boston globe</category><category>BostonGlobe</category><category>featured</category><category>new york times</category><category>newspaper</category><category>newspaper industry</category><category>NewspaperIndustry</category><category>NewYorkTimes</category><category>nyt</category><category>pulitzer prize</category><category>PulitzerPrize</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 08:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[New York Times to cut 100 newsroom positions]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/new-york-times-to-cut-100-newsroom-positions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/new-york-times-to-cut-100-newsroom-positions/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/new-york-times-to-cut-100-newsroom-positions/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gci/" rel="tag">Gannett Co (GCI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/07/nyt-new-york-times-logo.jpg" />The folks in the news business are probably growing to hate Mondays. <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/gannett-inc-del/gci/nys">Gannett</a>'s (NYSE: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/gannett-inc-del/gci/nys">GCI</a>) profits are off by more than 50%, and the <em><a target="_blank" href="http://www.nytimes.com">New York Times</a></em> announced that it's chopping 100 jobs from the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/newsroom/">newsroom</a>, along with an unspecified number elsewhere in the newspaper. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/19/gannett-profit-falls-by-more-than-half/">Like Gannett</a>, the <em>New York Times</em> cites declines in ad revenue as the reason for the decision. The company is hoping that employees will take voluntary buyouts where offered, but <a target="_blank" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33384551/ns/business-media_biz/">it is prepared to conduct a round of layoffs if necessary</a>.</p>
<p>The newspaper, which is the flagship property of the <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys">New York Times Company</a> (NYSE: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys">NYT</a>), cut 100 newsroom positions last year, mostly through voluntary buyouts, before a "relatively small" round of layoffs. This year's 100-job cut is approximately 8% of the newsroom, but the paper will still have the largest in the United States. Approximately 1,150 reporters and editors will remain. Already, 100 jobs have been slashed on the business side, leaving it now staffed at 1,850.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/new-york-times-to-cut-100-newsroom-positions/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>New York Times to cut 100 newsroom positions</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/new-york-times-to-cut-100-newsroom-positions/">New York Times to cut 100 newsroom positions</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 20 Oct 2009 10:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33384551/ns/business-media_biz/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/new-york-times-to-cut-100-newsroom-positions/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19201837/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/new-york-times-to-cut-100-newsroom-positions/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>gannett</category><category>gannett co gci</category><category>gannettco.</category><category>GannettCoGci</category><category>gci</category><category>inthenews</category><category>new york times</category><category>new york times co.</category><category>newspaper</category><category>newspaper advertising</category><category>newspaper industry</category><category>NewspaperAdvertising</category><category>NewspaperIndustry</category><category>newspapers</category><category>newsroom</category><category>NewYorkTimes</category><category>NewYorkTimesCo.</category><category>nyt</category><category>nytimes</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 10:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Gannett profit falls by more than half]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/gannett-profit-falls-by-more-than-half/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/gannett-profit-falls-by-more-than-half/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/gannett-profit-falls-by-more-than-half/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gci/" rel="tag">Gannett Co (GCI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/gannett-co-gci-logo.jpg" /><a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/gannett-inc-del/gci/nys">Gannett</a> (NYSE: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/gannett-inc-del/gci/nys">GCI</a>) lost more than half its third-quarter profits year-over-year, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/companies/earnings/2009-10-19-gannett_N.htm">as the newspaper industry shows yet another sign of decline</a>. A substantial drop in ad revenue was the primary reason for the plunge.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/newspaper/">newspaper</a> giant was able to stay in the black because of aggressive cost cutting, a move that can work for only so long. For now, it's the most popular option available to the beleaguered industry, as evidenced by a <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys">New York Times</a> (NYSE: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys">NYT</a>) announcement that it would <a target="_blank" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33384551/ns/business-media_biz/">slash another 100 positions from the newsroom</a>, and more positions elsewhere.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/gannett-profit-falls-by-more-than-half/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Gannett profit falls by more than half</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/gannett-profit-falls-by-more-than-half/">Gannett profit falls by more than half</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 20 Oct 2009 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.usatoday.com/money/companies/earnings/2009-10-19-gannett_N.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/gannett-profit-falls-by-more-than-half/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19201830/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/gannett-profit-falls-by-more-than-half/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>gannett</category><category>gannett co gci</category><category>gannett co layoffs</category><category>gannett co.</category><category>GannettCo.</category><category>GannettCoGci</category><category>GannettCoLayoffs</category><category>gci</category><category>inthenews</category><category>new york times</category><category>new york times co.</category><category>newspaper</category><category>newspaper advertising</category><category>newspaper industry</category><category>NewspaperAdvertising</category><category>NewspaperIndustry</category><category>newspapers</category><category>newsprint</category><category>NewYorkTimes</category><category>NewYorkTimesCo.</category><category>nyt</category><category>nytimes</category><category>usa today</category><category>UsaToday</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[NYT pulls Boston Globe off the block]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/15/nyt-pulls-boston-globe-off-the-block/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/15/nyt-pulls-boston-globe-off-the-block/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/15/nyt-pulls-boston-globe-off-the-block/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/10/boston_globe.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />After months of speculation and years of underperformance, the<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys" target="_blank"> New York Times Company</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys" target="_blank">NYT</a>) has <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/innovationNews/idUSTRE59D5MI20091014" target="_blank">decided not to sell the Boston Globe and related businesses</a>. The company claims that the changes made at the Globe to slash expenses and right the ship financially have made it worth holding on to the newspaper. This comes after<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/11/boston-globe-s-future-remains-uncertain/" target="_blank"> two parties submitted their final bids</a> (similar financially) for the beleaguered 137-year-old property. </p>
<p>The NY Times Co. picked up the Globe in 1993 for $1.1 billion. Since then, it's watched the paper's revenue and circulation plummet, a situation worsened by the advent of the internet and the<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/newspaperindustry/"> newspaper industry</a>'s generally slow response to it. Now, it's apparently worth just under 10% of NYT's original purchase price, with the offers pushed higher by both parties' willingness to assume $59 million in pension liabilities. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/15/nyt-pulls-boston-globe-off-the-block/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>NYT pulls Boston Globe off the block</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/15/nyt-pulls-boston-globe-off-the-block/">NYT pulls Boston Globe off the block</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 15 Oct 2009 08:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/innovationNews/idUSTRE59D5MI20091014>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/15/nyt-pulls-boston-globe-off-the-block/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19196514/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/15/nyt-pulls-boston-globe-off-the-block/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>arthur sulzberger</category><category>ArthurSulzberger</category><category>boston</category><category>boston globe</category><category>boston massachusetts</category><category>boston.com</category><category>BostonGlobe</category><category>BostonMassachusetts</category><category>featured</category><category>goldman sachs</category><category>goldman sachs group</category><category>goldman sachs group gs</category><category>GoldmanSachs</category><category>GoldmanSachsGroup</category><category>GoldmanSachsGroupGs</category><category>gs</category><category>massachusetts</category><category>new york times co.</category><category>new york times company</category><category>newspaper</category><category>newspaper industry</category><category>NewspaperIndustry</category><category>newspapers</category><category>NewYorkTimesCo.</category><category>NewYorkTimesCompany</category><category>nyt</category><category>nytimes</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 08:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[USA Today sees circulation off 17%, blames travel]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/12/usa-today-sees-circulation-off-17-blames-travel/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/12/usa-today-sees-circulation-off-17-blames-travel/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/12/usa-today-sees-circulation-off-17-blames-travel/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gci/" rel="tag">Gannett Co (GCI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/gannett-co-gci-logo.jpg" />McNews is being <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33244441/ns/business-media_biz/" target="_blank">squeezed by two market downturns</a>. So, if you think most <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/newspapers/">newspapers</a> have it bad, realize that it could be much worse. </p>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/gannett-inc-del/gci/nys" target="_blank">Gannett</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/gannett-inc-del/gci/nys" target="_blank">GCI</a>) major national paper, <em><a href="http://www.usatoday.com" target="_blank">USA Today</a></em>, is getting ready to report a 17% drop in circulation - the largest it has ever sustained. The popular daily is fighting a battle on two fronts. It has to deal with a media slump and a <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/travel/">travel</a> recession. It's hard to pick two tougher industries in this economic climate.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/12/usa-today-sees-circulation-off-17-blames-travel/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>USA Today sees circulation off 17%, blames travel</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/12/usa-today-sees-circulation-off-17-blames-travel/">USA Today sees circulation off 17%, blames travel</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 12 Oct 2009 11:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/12/usa-today-sees-circulation-off-17-blames-travel/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19191732/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/12/usa-today-sees-circulation-off-17-blames-travel/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>audit bureau of circulations</category><category>gannett</category><category>gci</category><category>inthenews</category><category>newspaper industry</category><category>newspapers</category><category>print media</category><category>travel</category><category>travel industry</category><category>usa today</category><category>UsaToday</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 11:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Soros to put $1 billion into clean-tech companies]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/12/soros-to-put-1-billion-into-clean-tech-companies/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/12/soros-to-put-1-billion-into-clean-tech-companies/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/12/soros-to-put-1-billion-into-clean-tech-companies/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/india/" rel="tag">India</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/brazil/" rel="tag">Brazil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/privateequity/" rel="tag">Private Equity</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/eastern-europe/" rel="tag">Eastern Europe</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/green-stocks/" rel="tag">Green   Stocks</a></p><p><img hspace="4" height="375" border="1" align="right" width="240" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/george-soros.jpg" /> The <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/cleantechnology/">clean technology</a> wave just got a little bigger. This tends to be a side-effect of interest from billionaire investor <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/GeorgeSoros/">George Soros</a>. And, as usual, <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aMU3BkV3yqPU" target="_blank">it's more than just money; it's more than just a return</a>. Soros, yet again, is trying to save the world. Interestingly, the bold move was announced at a meeting on climate change sponsored by Project Syndicate - an international association consisting of 430 newspapers from 150 countries (and thus with clear ties to the past, rather than future). </p>
<p>The investor and founder of Soros Fund Management LLC is planning to put $1 billion into <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/cleantech/">clean-tech</a> opportunities using what he calls "rather stringent criteria," which involves being "profitable but should also actually make a contribution to solving the problem [i.e., of clean technology adoption and proliferation]." Soros didn't provide any other details on the nature or scope of his investments. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/12/soros-to-put-1-billion-into-clean-tech-companies/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Soros to put $1 billion into clean-tech companies</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/12/soros-to-put-1-billion-into-clean-tech-companies/">Soros to put $1 billion into clean-tech companies</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 12 Oct 2009 08:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aMU3BkV3yqPU>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/12/soros-to-put-1-billion-into-clean-tech-companies/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19191887/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/12/soros-to-put-1-billion-into-clean-tech-companies/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>california</category><category>clean</category><category>clean technology</category><category>cleantech</category><category>CleanTechnology</category><category>climate change</category><category>ClimateChange</category><category>george soros</category><category>GeorgeSoros</category><category>global warming</category><category>GlobalWarming</category><category>greenhouse</category><category>greenhouse gases</category><category>GreenhouseGases</category><category>inthenews</category><category>newspaper</category><category>newspaper industry</category><category>NewspaperIndustry</category><category>newspapers</category><category>san francisco</category><category>SanFrancisco</category><category>soros</category><category>soros management fund</category><category>sorosfundmanagement</category><category>SorosManagementFund</category><category>venture capital</category><category>VentureCapital</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 08:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Boston Globe's future remains uncertain]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/11/boston-globe-s-future-remains-uncertain/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/11/boston-globe-s-future-remains-uncertain/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/11/boston-globe-s-future-remains-uncertain/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/privateequity/" rel="tag">Private Equity</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/04/bostonglobelogo.gif" alt="" />The next step remains uncertain for what will go down in history as among the worst newspaper acquisitions. </p>
<p>On Friday, the deadline for submitting bids for the <em><a href="http://www.boston.com" target="_blank">Boston Globe</a></em>, which is owned by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys" target="_blank">The New York Times Company</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys" target="_blank">NYT</a>), passed. <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/10/business/media/10globe.html?_r=1&amp;ref=business">Two major contenders</a> were expected to write figures on slips of paper and slide them across the proverbial desk: Platinum Equity, a Beverly Hills-based private equity firm and owner of the <em>San Diego Union-Tribune</em>, and Stephen E. Taylor, whose family sold the Globe in 1993.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/11/boston-globe-s-future-remains-uncertain/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Boston Globe's future remains uncertain</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/11/boston-globe-s-future-remains-uncertain/">Boston Globe's future remains uncertain</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 11 Oct 2009 15:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/11/boston-globe-s-future-remains-uncertain/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19191707/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/11/boston-globe-s-future-remains-uncertain/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>beverly hills</category><category>boston</category><category>boston globe</category><category>goldman sachs group</category><category>gs</category><category>inthenews</category><category>newspaper industry</category><category>newspapers</category><category>ny times</category><category>nyt</category><category>nytimes</category><category>platinum equity</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 15:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Print pubs inch closer to the internet]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/04/print-pubs-inch-closer-to-the-internet/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/04/print-pubs-inch-closer-to-the-internet/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/04/print-pubs-inch-closer-to-the-internet/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amzn/" rel="tag">Amazon.com (AMZN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/09/time-warner-media-logo-design.jpg" />Printers of the world unite! Feeling the squeeze from the likes of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas" target="_blank">Amazon</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas" target="_blank">AMZN</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas" target="_blank">Apple</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas" target="_blank">AAPL</a>), a group of magazine publishers is <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/8de6b040-af79-11de-ba1c-00144feabdc0.html?nclick_check=1" target="_blank">forming an industrywide joint venture</a> ... for protection. </p>
<p>Led by Time Inc., a division of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys" target="_blank">Time Warner</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys" target="_blank">TWX</a>), participating companies would create a digital storefront for their content. In this way, they could peddle their goods without the hefty carve-outs that come with Amazon and Apple deals.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/04/print-pubs-inch-closer-to-the-internet/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Print pubs inch closer to the internet</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/04/print-pubs-inch-closer-to-the-internet/">Print pubs inch closer to the internet</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 04 Oct 2009 10:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/04/print-pubs-inch-closer-to-the-internet/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19183551/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/04/print-pubs-inch-closer-to-the-internet/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aapl</category><category>amazon kindle</category><category>amazon.com</category><category>amzn</category><category>apple</category><category>conde nast</category><category>ge</category><category>general electric</category><category>hearst</category><category>inthenews</category><category>magazines</category><category>nbc</category><category>nbc universal</category><category>news corp.</category><category>news corporation</category><category>newspaper industry</category><category>newspapers</category><category>nws</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 10:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Newspapers resist Apple Tablet, like they've resisted everything else]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/02/newspapers-resist-apple-tablet-like-theyve-resisted-everything/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/02/newspapers-resist-apple-tablet-like-theyve-resisted-everything/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/02/newspapers-resist-apple-tablet-like-theyve-resisted-everything/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amzn/" rel="tag">Amazon.com (AMZN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/apple.jpg" alt="" />With the <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">Apple</a> (NASDAQ: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>) Tablet, newspapers doing what they should have done: thinking about the possible impact to their business and <a target="_blank" href="http://adage.com/mediaworks/article?article_id=139387">trying to find ways to mitigate it</a>. This comes 15 years after the industry ignored the internet and a decade after it disregarded <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>). Of course, unwilling to admit its salient and severe fallibility, the newspaper folks are saying that they don't want the Tablet to destroy print the way the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/iPod/">iPod</a> destroyed the music industry.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/newspapers/">newspapers</a> are apparently worried that circulation could plunge, driving profits through the floor and jeopardizing their abilities to operate. They are concerned that properties like the <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys">New York Times Co.</a>'s (NYSE: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys">NYT</a>) <em><a target="_blank" href="http://www.boston.com">Boston Globe</a></em> could wind up selling for a single-digit percentage of the original purchase price.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/02/newspapers-resist-apple-tablet-like-theyve-resisted-everything/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Newspapers resist Apple Tablet, like they've resisted everything else</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/02/newspapers-resist-apple-tablet-like-theyve-resisted-everything/">Newspapers resist Apple Tablet, like they've resisted everything else</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 02 Oct 2009 12:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/02/newspapers-resist-apple-tablet-like-theyve-resisted-everything/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19182376/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/02/newspapers-resist-apple-tablet-like-theyve-resisted-everything/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aapl</category><category>amazon</category><category>amazon kindle</category><category>amazon.com</category><category>amzn</category><category>app store</category><category>apple tablet</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>internet</category><category>inthenews</category><category>ipod</category><category>itunes</category><category>itunes store</category><category>kindle</category><category>newspaper industry</category><category>newspapers</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 12:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Boston Globe may be off the block]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/10/boston-globe-may-be-off-the-block/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/10/boston-globe-may-be-off-the-block/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/10/boston-globe-may-be-off-the-block/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/04/bostonglobelogo.gif" />The battered <a href="http://www.boston.com" target="_blank"><em>Boston Globe</em></a> isn't worth 90% of what the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys" target="_blank">NY Times Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys" target="_blank">NYT</a>) paid for it, but it seems to have bounced a bit from the bottom of the barrel. In a meeting with a few hundred of the newspaper's employees, company chairman Arthur Sulzberger Jr. and CEO Janet Robinson revealed that the <em>Globe</em>'s finances have improved significantly. Because of this development, they continued, there is a chance the newspaper will not be sold. </p>
<p>This was the first meeting between company executives and the <em>Globe</em>'s unions since the latter accepted pay cuts back in July. The newspaper, which has a 137-year history, lost $50 million in 2008 and looked like it was going to drop another $85 million this year. Though this no longer appears likely, the Globe is still in rough shape.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/10/boston-globe-may-be-off-the-block/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Boston Globe may be off the block</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/10/boston-globe-may-be-off-the-block/">Boston Globe may be off the block</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 10 Sep 2009 11:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/10/boston-globe-may-be-off-the-block/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19156728/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/10/boston-globe-may-be-off-the-block/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>arthur sulzberger</category><category>boston</category><category>boston globe</category><category>inthenews</category><category>new york city</category><category>new york times</category><category>newspaper industry</category><category>newspapers</category><category>ny times</category><category>NyTimes</category><category>sulzberger</category><category>sulzbergerfamily</category><category>sulzbergers</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 11:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Be careful about trading Gannett after its Q2 report]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/16/be-careful-about-trading-gannett-after-its-q2-report/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/16/be-careful-about-trading-gannett-after-its-q2-report/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/16/be-careful-about-trading-gannett-after-its-q2-report/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gci/" rel="tag">Gannett Co (GCI)</a></p><div id="imageResults" style="DISPLAY: block"><img hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/gannett-co-gci-logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" /></div>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/gannett-inc-del/gci/nys">Gannett </a>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/gannett-inc-del/gci/nys">GCI</a>), publisher of USA Today and other newspapers, as well as owner of many informational websites such as CareerBuilder.com, made some news of its own yesterday on Wall Street. After reporting <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/gannett-co-inc-reports-second-quarter/rfid232155535">second-quarter results</a>, the stock had a great day. How great was Gannett's day? Shares closed higher by nearly 29%. Let me repeat that: 29%!  And volume . . . it was way, way above the norm.</p>
<p>What in the world triggered this response by investors and/or traders? Gannett beat expectations. On an adjusted basis, the company made 46 cents per share. <a href="http://www.earnings.com/company.asp?ticker=GCI&amp;coid=84662&amp;client=cb">Earnings.com</a> indicates that this performance is 10 cents better than analyst expected. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/16/be-careful-about-trading-gannett-after-its-q2-report/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Be careful about trading Gannett after its Q2 report</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/16/be-careful-about-trading-gannett-after-its-q2-report/">Be careful about trading Gannett after its Q2 report</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 16 Jul 2009 08:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/gannett-co-inc-reports-second-quarter/rfid232155535>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/25/gannett-high-yield-high-risk/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/16/be-careful-about-trading-gannett-after-its-q2-report/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19099457/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/16/be-careful-about-trading-gannett-after-its-q2-report/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dividend investing</category><category>dividend stocks</category><category>DividendInvesting</category><category>dividends</category><category>DividendStocks</category><category>Gannett</category><category>GCI</category><category>inthenews</category><category>newspaper industry</category><category>NewspaperIndustry</category><category>USA Today</category><category>UsaToday</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 08:00:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
