<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Looser auditing rules keeping some newspaper heads above water]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/23/looser-auditing-rules-keeping-some-newspaper-heads-above-water/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/23/looser-auditing-rules-keeping-some-newspaper-heads-above-water/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/23/looser-auditing-rules-keeping-some-newspaper-heads-above-water/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gci/" rel="tag">Gannett Co (GCI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><img hspace="4" height="175" border="1" align="right" width="200" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/10/coffee_stock.jpg" alt="" />Bundling is beautiful for newspapers. Since April 1, 2009, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34094479/ns/business-media_biz/">new rules for counting circulation have turned some newspapers from losing to gaining</a>, even in a market where the print community is getting thrashed. Instead of selling more copies every day, these publications are counting online visits, as long as they are from paying subscribers - for either protected portions of the website or digital replica editions.</p>
<p>The new auditing standards, which affect <em>USA Today</em>, a Gannet (<a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/gannett-inc-del/gci/nys">GCI</a>) property, and News Corp's (<a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas">NWS</a>) <em>Wall Street Journal</em>, among others, often allow newspapers that bundle print and digital editions to count the subscriber twice. According to a report by the Associated Press, the new rule is preventing circulation from looking as bad as it really may be.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/23/looser-auditing-rules-keeping-some-newspaper-heads-above-water/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Looser auditing rules keeping some newspaper heads above water</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/23/looser-auditing-rules-keeping-some-newspaper-heads-above-water/">Looser auditing rules keeping some newspaper heads above water</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34094479/ns/business-media_biz/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/23/looser-auditing-rules-keeping-some-newspaper-heads-above-water/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19249895/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/23/looser-auditing-rules-keeping-some-newspaper-heads-above-water/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>abc</category><category>audit bureau of circulations</category><category>circulation</category><category>GannettCo.</category><category>GCI</category><category>inthenews</category><category>news corp</category><category>news corporation</category><category>newspaper circulation</category><category>Newspaper circulation declines</category><category>newspaper industry</category><category>NewspaperCirculation</category><category>NewspaperCirculationDeclines</category><category>NewspaperIndustry</category><category>NWS</category><category>subscriptions</category><category>usa today</category><category>UsaToday</category><category>wall street journal</category><category>WallStreetJournal</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Newspaper ad revenue of 28%, 8 quarters of double-digit drops]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/newspaper-ad-revenue-of-28-8-quarters-of-double-digit-drops/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/newspaper-ad-revenue-of-28-8-quarters-of-double-digit-drops/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/newspaper-ad-revenue-of-28-8-quarters-of-double-digit-drops/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gci/" rel="tag">Gannett Co (GCI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><img border="1" align="right" width="200" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="163" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/teapaper.jpg" alt="" />We've put three quarters behind us in 2009, and the most recent one was merely another miserable step downward for the beleaguered newspaper industry. Total ad revenue plummeted in the third quarter to $6.4 billion for the print jockeys, a decline of 28%. <a href="http://www.naa.org/TrendsandNumbers/Advertising-Expenditures.aspx" target="_blank">This info from the Newspaper Association of America</a> drives home the notion that conditions will only worsen for the newspaper industry. So, if you're hoping those shares of New York Times Company (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys" target="_blank">NYT</a>), Gannett (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/gannett-inc-del/gci/nys" target="_blank">GCI</a>) and Washington Post Company (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-washington-post-company/wpo/nys" target="_blank">WPO</a>), holding your breath will leave you little more than dizzy.</p>
<p>Of the total advertising revenue generated in the third quarter of 2009, $5.8 million came from print, the lowest quarterly amount this year. The $623 million in online advertising sold by America's newspapers was also 2009's worst. Both are down substantially from the same quarter in 2008, when the newspapers posted print ad revenue of $8.2 million and online ad revenue of $750 million, according to NAA data. At this time last year, we lamented year-over-year declines approaching 20%. Now, we have the same feelings as ad revenue drops approach 30%.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/newspaper-ad-revenue-of-28-8-quarters-of-double-digit-drops/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Newspaper ad revenue of 28%, 8 quarters of double-digit drops</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/newspaper-ad-revenue-of-28-8-quarters-of-double-digit-drops/">Newspaper ad revenue of 28%, 8 quarters of double-digit drops</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/newspaper-ad-revenue-of-28-8-quarters-of-double-digit-drops/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19248391/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/newspaper-ad-revenue-of-28-8-quarters-of-double-digit-drops/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ad revenue</category><category>AdRevenue</category><category>advertising</category><category>featured</category><category>gannett</category><category>gannett co gci</category><category>GannettCo.</category><category>GannettCoGci</category><category>GCI</category><category>new york times</category><category>New York Times Co</category><category>new york times company</category><category>newspaper</category><category>newspaper advertising</category><category>newspaper association of america</category><category>newspaper industry</category><category>newspaper stocks</category><category>NewspaperAdvertising</category><category>NewspaperAssociationOfAmerica</category><category>NewspaperIndustry</category><category>newspapers</category><category>NewspaperStocks</category><category>NewYorkTimes</category><category>NewYorkTimesCo</category><category>NewYorkTimesCompany</category><category>nyt</category><category>online ads</category><category>online advertising</category><category>OnlineAds</category><category>OnlineAdvertising</category><category>print ads</category><category>print advertising</category><category>PrintAds</category><category>PrintAdvertising</category><category>washington post</category><category>Washington Post Co.</category><category>WashingtonPost</category><category>WashingtonPostCo.</category><category>WPO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[NYT News Service migrates after cut]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/nyt-news-service-migrates-after-cuts/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/nyt-news-service-migrates-after-cuts/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/nyt-news-service-migrates-after-cuts/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/07/nyt-new-york-times-logo.jpg" alt="" />This winter, a bit more of <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/NewYork/">New York</a> is headed to <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Florida/">Florida</a>. <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Layoffs/">Layoffs</a> for 2010 have already been announced for the New York Times Company(<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/13/business/media/13times.html?_r=1&amp;ref=media" target="_blank">NYT</a>). The New York Times News Service will lose 25 editorial positions next year and shift the service's editing to one of the parent company's Florida <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/newspapers/">newspapers</a>. At present, the news service has 30 editorial jobs. Some of the layoffs will occur in February, and the others will happen in May.</p>
<p>These layoffs are not included in the planned slashing of 100 jobs in the flagship newspaper's newsroom -- a workforce reduction of 8% that should take hold by the end of the year. The NY Times is also ceasing pension contributions for nonunion employees.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/nyt-news-service-migrates-after-cuts/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>NYT News Service migrates after cut</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/nyt-news-service-migrates-after-cuts/">NYT News Service migrates after cut</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/nyt-news-service-migrates-after-cuts/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19236718/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/nyt-news-service-migrates-after-cuts/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>gainesville</category><category>inthenews</category><category>layoffs</category><category>new york times</category><category>new york times co.</category><category>new york times company</category><category>newspaper industry</category><category>newspaper stocks</category><category>NewspaperIndustry</category><category>newspapers</category><category>NewspaperStocks</category><category>NewYorkTimes</category><category>NewYorkTimesCo.</category><category>NewYorkTimesCompany</category><category>nyt</category><category>nytimes</category><category>unions</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Boston Globe's Ainsley $1.2 million departure package]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/boston-globes-ainsley-1-2-million-departure-package/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/boston-globes-ainsley-1-2-million-departure-package/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/boston-globes-ainsley-1-2-million-departure-package/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/04/bostonglobelogo.gif" />It costs a fortune to cut fat. For regular people, it can mean hundreds or even thousands of dollars on gym memberships, special meals and organic restaurants. Yet, this pales in comparison to how much the Boston Globe is spending to lose some dead weight. It could cost the <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys">NY Times Co.</a> (NYSE: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys">NYT</a>) property more than $1.2 million to <a target="_blank" href="http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2009/10/29/boston-globe-publisher-retires-after-paper-nearly-dies/">bid adieu to the publisher that almost ran it into the ground</a>. </p>
<p>Steven Ainsley has announced that he's going to retire as publisher of the Globe after having been at the helm for three years. Though quite proud of the two Pulitzer Prizes the paper picked up under Ainsley, the announcement didn't include the fact that he almost caused the newspaper retire before him. As usual, the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/newspaper/">newspaper</a> is all too eager to talk about its awards, without even acknowledging the fact that it's on the brink of disaster.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/boston-globes-ainsley-1-2-million-departure-package/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Boston Globe's Ainsley $1.2 million departure package</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/boston-globes-ainsley-1-2-million-departure-package/">Boston Globe's Ainsley $1.2 million departure package</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 30 Oct 2009 08:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://blogs.reuters.com/mediafile/2009/10/29/boston-globe-publisher-retires-after-paper-nearly-dies/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/boston-globes-ainsley-1-2-million-departure-package/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19216355/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/boston-globes-ainsley-1-2-million-departure-package/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>boston globe</category><category>BostonGlobe</category><category>featured</category><category>new york times</category><category>newspaper</category><category>newspaper industry</category><category>NewspaperIndustry</category><category>NewYorkTimes</category><category>nyt</category><category>pulitzer prize</category><category>PulitzerPrize</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 08:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[New York Times to cut 100 newsroom positions]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/new-york-times-to-cut-100-newsroom-positions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/new-york-times-to-cut-100-newsroom-positions/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/new-york-times-to-cut-100-newsroom-positions/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gci/" rel="tag">Gannett Co (GCI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/07/nyt-new-york-times-logo.jpg" />The folks in the news business are probably growing to hate Mondays. <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/gannett-inc-del/gci/nys">Gannett</a>'s (NYSE: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/gannett-inc-del/gci/nys">GCI</a>) profits are off by more than 50%, and the <em><a target="_blank" href="http://www.nytimes.com">New York Times</a></em> announced that it's chopping 100 jobs from the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/newsroom/">newsroom</a>, along with an unspecified number elsewhere in the newspaper. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/19/gannett-profit-falls-by-more-than-half/">Like Gannett</a>, the <em>New York Times</em> cites declines in ad revenue as the reason for the decision. The company is hoping that employees will take voluntary buyouts where offered, but <a target="_blank" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33384551/ns/business-media_biz/">it is prepared to conduct a round of layoffs if necessary</a>.</p>
<p>The newspaper, which is the flagship property of the <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys">New York Times Company</a> (NYSE: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys">NYT</a>), cut 100 newsroom positions last year, mostly through voluntary buyouts, before a "relatively small" round of layoffs. This year's 100-job cut is approximately 8% of the newsroom, but the paper will still have the largest in the United States. Approximately 1,150 reporters and editors will remain. Already, 100 jobs have been slashed on the business side, leaving it now staffed at 1,850.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/new-york-times-to-cut-100-newsroom-positions/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>New York Times to cut 100 newsroom positions</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/new-york-times-to-cut-100-newsroom-positions/">New York Times to cut 100 newsroom positions</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 20 Oct 2009 10:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33384551/ns/business-media_biz/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/new-york-times-to-cut-100-newsroom-positions/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19201837/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/new-york-times-to-cut-100-newsroom-positions/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>gannett</category><category>gannett co gci</category><category>gannettco.</category><category>GannettCoGci</category><category>gci</category><category>inthenews</category><category>new york times</category><category>new york times co.</category><category>newspaper</category><category>newspaper advertising</category><category>newspaper industry</category><category>NewspaperAdvertising</category><category>NewspaperIndustry</category><category>newspapers</category><category>newsroom</category><category>NewYorkTimes</category><category>NewYorkTimesCo.</category><category>nyt</category><category>nytimes</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 10:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Gannett profit falls by more than half]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/gannett-profit-falls-by-more-than-half/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/gannett-profit-falls-by-more-than-half/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/gannett-profit-falls-by-more-than-half/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gci/" rel="tag">Gannett Co (GCI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/gannett-co-gci-logo.jpg" /><a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/gannett-inc-del/gci/nys">Gannett</a> (NYSE: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/gannett-inc-del/gci/nys">GCI</a>) lost more than half its third-quarter profits year-over-year, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/companies/earnings/2009-10-19-gannett_N.htm">as the newspaper industry shows yet another sign of decline</a>. A substantial drop in ad revenue was the primary reason for the plunge.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/newspaper/">newspaper</a> giant was able to stay in the black because of aggressive cost cutting, a move that can work for only so long. For now, it's the most popular option available to the beleaguered industry, as evidenced by a <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys">New York Times</a> (NYSE: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys">NYT</a>) announcement that it would <a target="_blank" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33384551/ns/business-media_biz/">slash another 100 positions from the newsroom</a>, and more positions elsewhere.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/gannett-profit-falls-by-more-than-half/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Gannett profit falls by more than half</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/gannett-profit-falls-by-more-than-half/">Gannett profit falls by more than half</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 20 Oct 2009 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.usatoday.com/money/companies/earnings/2009-10-19-gannett_N.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/gannett-profit-falls-by-more-than-half/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19201830/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/gannett-profit-falls-by-more-than-half/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>gannett</category><category>gannett co gci</category><category>gannett co layoffs</category><category>gannett co.</category><category>GannettCo.</category><category>GannettCoGci</category><category>GannettCoLayoffs</category><category>gci</category><category>inthenews</category><category>new york times</category><category>new york times co.</category><category>newspaper</category><category>newspaper advertising</category><category>newspaper industry</category><category>NewspaperAdvertising</category><category>NewspaperIndustry</category><category>newspapers</category><category>newsprint</category><category>NewYorkTimes</category><category>NewYorkTimesCo.</category><category>nyt</category><category>nytimes</category><category>usa today</category><category>UsaToday</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[NYT pulls Boston Globe off the block]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/15/nyt-pulls-boston-globe-off-the-block/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/15/nyt-pulls-boston-globe-off-the-block/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/15/nyt-pulls-boston-globe-off-the-block/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/10/boston_globe.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />After months of speculation and years of underperformance, the<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys" target="_blank"> New York Times Company</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys" target="_blank">NYT</a>) has <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/innovationNews/idUSTRE59D5MI20091014" target="_blank">decided not to sell the Boston Globe and related businesses</a>. The company claims that the changes made at the Globe to slash expenses and right the ship financially have made it worth holding on to the newspaper. This comes after<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/11/boston-globe-s-future-remains-uncertain/" target="_blank"> two parties submitted their final bids</a> (similar financially) for the beleaguered 137-year-old property. </p>
<p>The NY Times Co. picked up the Globe in 1993 for $1.1 billion. Since then, it's watched the paper's revenue and circulation plummet, a situation worsened by the advent of the internet and the<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/newspaperindustry/"> newspaper industry</a>'s generally slow response to it. Now, it's apparently worth just under 10% of NYT's original purchase price, with the offers pushed higher by both parties' willingness to assume $59 million in pension liabilities. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/15/nyt-pulls-boston-globe-off-the-block/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>NYT pulls Boston Globe off the block</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/15/nyt-pulls-boston-globe-off-the-block/">NYT pulls Boston Globe off the block</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 15 Oct 2009 08:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/innovationNews/idUSTRE59D5MI20091014>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/15/nyt-pulls-boston-globe-off-the-block/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19196514/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/15/nyt-pulls-boston-globe-off-the-block/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>arthur sulzberger</category><category>ArthurSulzberger</category><category>boston</category><category>boston globe</category><category>boston massachusetts</category><category>boston.com</category><category>BostonGlobe</category><category>BostonMassachusetts</category><category>featured</category><category>goldman sachs</category><category>goldman sachs group</category><category>goldman sachs group gs</category><category>GoldmanSachs</category><category>GoldmanSachsGroup</category><category>GoldmanSachsGroupGs</category><category>gs</category><category>massachusetts</category><category>new york times co.</category><category>new york times company</category><category>newspaper</category><category>newspaper industry</category><category>NewspaperIndustry</category><category>newspapers</category><category>NewYorkTimesCo.</category><category>NewYorkTimesCompany</category><category>nyt</category><category>nytimes</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 08:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Soros to put $1 billion into clean-tech companies]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/12/soros-to-put-1-billion-into-clean-tech-companies/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/12/soros-to-put-1-billion-into-clean-tech-companies/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/12/soros-to-put-1-billion-into-clean-tech-companies/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/india/" rel="tag">India</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/brazil/" rel="tag">Brazil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/privateequity/" rel="tag">Private Equity</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/eastern-europe/" rel="tag">Eastern Europe</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/green-stocks/" rel="tag">Green   Stocks</a></p><p><img hspace="4" height="375" border="1" align="right" width="240" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/george-soros.jpg" /> The <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/cleantechnology/">clean technology</a> wave just got a little bigger. This tends to be a side-effect of interest from billionaire investor <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/GeorgeSoros/">George Soros</a>. And, as usual, <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aMU3BkV3yqPU" target="_blank">it's more than just money; it's more than just a return</a>. Soros, yet again, is trying to save the world. Interestingly, the bold move was announced at a meeting on climate change sponsored by Project Syndicate - an international association consisting of 430 newspapers from 150 countries (and thus with clear ties to the past, rather than future). </p>
<p>The investor and founder of Soros Fund Management LLC is planning to put $1 billion into <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/cleantech/">clean-tech</a> opportunities using what he calls "rather stringent criteria," which involves being "profitable but should also actually make a contribution to solving the problem [i.e., of clean technology adoption and proliferation]." Soros didn't provide any other details on the nature or scope of his investments. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/12/soros-to-put-1-billion-into-clean-tech-companies/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Soros to put $1 billion into clean-tech companies</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/12/soros-to-put-1-billion-into-clean-tech-companies/">Soros to put $1 billion into clean-tech companies</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 12 Oct 2009 08:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aMU3BkV3yqPU>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/12/soros-to-put-1-billion-into-clean-tech-companies/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19191887/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/12/soros-to-put-1-billion-into-clean-tech-companies/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>california</category><category>clean</category><category>clean technology</category><category>cleantech</category><category>CleanTechnology</category><category>climate change</category><category>ClimateChange</category><category>george soros</category><category>GeorgeSoros</category><category>global warming</category><category>GlobalWarming</category><category>greenhouse</category><category>greenhouse gases</category><category>GreenhouseGases</category><category>inthenews</category><category>newspaper</category><category>newspaper industry</category><category>NewspaperIndustry</category><category>newspapers</category><category>san francisco</category><category>SanFrancisco</category><category>soros</category><category>soros management fund</category><category>sorosfundmanagement</category><category>SorosManagementFund</category><category>venture capital</category><category>VentureCapital</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 08:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Be careful about trading Gannett after its Q2 report]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/16/be-careful-about-trading-gannett-after-its-q2-report/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/16/be-careful-about-trading-gannett-after-its-q2-report/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/16/be-careful-about-trading-gannett-after-its-q2-report/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gci/" rel="tag">Gannett Co (GCI)</a></p><div id="imageResults" style="DISPLAY: block"><img hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/gannett-co-gci-logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" /></div>
<p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/gannett-inc-del/gci/nys">Gannett </a>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/gannett-inc-del/gci/nys">GCI</a>), publisher of USA Today and other newspapers, as well as owner of many informational websites such as CareerBuilder.com, made some news of its own yesterday on Wall Street. After reporting <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/gannett-co-inc-reports-second-quarter/rfid232155535">second-quarter results</a>, the stock had a great day. How great was Gannett's day? Shares closed higher by nearly 29%. Let me repeat that: 29%!  And volume . . . it was way, way above the norm.</p>
<p>What in the world triggered this response by investors and/or traders? Gannett beat expectations. On an adjusted basis, the company made 46 cents per share. <a href="http://www.earnings.com/company.asp?ticker=GCI&amp;coid=84662&amp;client=cb">Earnings.com</a> indicates that this performance is 10 cents better than analyst expected. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/16/be-careful-about-trading-gannett-after-its-q2-report/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Be careful about trading Gannett after its Q2 report</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/16/be-careful-about-trading-gannett-after-its-q2-report/">Be careful about trading Gannett after its Q2 report</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 16 Jul 2009 08:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/gannett-co-inc-reports-second-quarter/rfid232155535>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/25/gannett-high-yield-high-risk/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/16/be-careful-about-trading-gannett-after-its-q2-report/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19099457/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/16/be-careful-about-trading-gannett-after-its-q2-report/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dividend investing</category><category>dividend stocks</category><category>DividendInvesting</category><category>dividends</category><category>DividendStocks</category><category>Gannett</category><category>GCI</category><category>inthenews</category><category>newspaper industry</category><category>NewspaperIndustry</category><category>USA Today</category><category>UsaToday</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 08:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Drop in newspaper circulation continues: But not fast enough!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/27/drop-in-newspaper-circ-continues-not-fast-enough/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/27/drop-in-newspaper-circ-continues-not-fast-enough/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/27/drop-in-newspaper-circ-continues-not-fast-enough/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gci/" rel="tag">Gannett Co (GCI)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/10/makeover-25-200cm101608.jpg" alt="" />A ways back my father did some very interesting economic research into what happened to the price of drugs when a generic entered a market previously owned only by branded drugs. His findings? The entry of generics actually caused prices of brand prescriptions to rise as people who insisted on the branded prescription were willing to pay a higher price. <br /><br />I was reminded of that research in reading today about the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/28/business/media/28paper.html?ref=business">continuing decline in circulation of the big papers.</a> The only one that managed a circulation gain was the Wall Street Journal. The hand wringing continues over this horrible state -- but this is a sign to the papers to make lemonade rather than lemons.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/27/drop-in-newspaper-circ-continues-not-fast-enough/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Drop in newspaper circulation continues: But not fast enough!</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/27/drop-in-newspaper-circ-continues-not-fast-enough/">Drop in newspaper circulation continues: But not fast enough!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 27 Apr 2009 16:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/27/drop-in-newspaper-circ-continues-not-fast-enough/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1529563/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/27/drop-in-newspaper-circ-continues-not-fast-enough/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>gannett</category><category>gci</category><category>newspaper</category><category>newspaper industry</category><category>NewspaperIndustry</category><category>newspapers</category><category>nyt</category><category>nytimes</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex Salkever]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 16:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Newspapers make a last stand on reporting]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/19/newspapers-make-a-last-stand-on-reporting/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/19/newspapers-make-a-last-stand-on-reporting/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/19/newspapers-make-a-last-stand-on-reporting/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gci/" rel="tag">Gannett Co (GCI)</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/10/coffee_stock.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Revenue at newspapers has dropped so rapidly that companies in the industry cannot cut costs, even reporters, fast enough. The trouble is that too few reporters means too little news.</p>
<p>Five newspapers are banding together to share news. It may be the future of keeping editorial costs down and may buy a little time for large chains like <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/gannett-inc-del/gci/nys">Gannett </a>(NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/gannett-inc-del/gci/nys">GCI</a>). <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/19/business/media/19paper.html?_r=1&amp;ref=business">According to</a><em>The New York Times, "</em>The consortium is made up of <em>The Daily News</em> of New York; <em>The Star-Ledger,</em> based in Newark; <em>The Buffalo News;</em> <em>The Record,</em> based in Hackensack, N.J.; and <em>The Times Union</em> of Albany." <em>The Daily News</em> and <em>Star-Ledger</em> are among the largest papers in the country.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/19/newspapers-make-a-last-stand-on-reporting/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Newspapers make a last stand on reporting</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/19/newspapers-make-a-last-stand-on-reporting/">Newspapers make a last stand on reporting</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 19 Feb 2009 09:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/19/newspapers-make-a-last-stand-on-reporting/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1465188/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/19/newspapers-make-a-last-stand-on-reporting/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>GCI</category><category>newspaper industry</category><category>NewspaperIndustry</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 09:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Your newspaper won't be delivered today, or ever]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/02/your-newspaper-wont-be-delivered-today-or-ever/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/02/your-newspaper-wont-be-delivered-today-or-ever/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/02/your-newspaper-wont-be-delivered-today-or-ever/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gci/" rel="tag">Gannett Co (GCI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p>Many of the large newspaper chain purchases over the last several years have involved tremendous borrowing and the banks are at the door with eviction notices. Even the big companies in the industry are having trouble. <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122290934833096645.html?mod=testMod">According to</a> <em>The Wall Street Journal, </em><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/gannett-inc-del/gci/nys">Gannett, Inc.</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/gannett-inc-del/gci/nys">GCI</a>) the country's largest newspaper publisher, said Wednesday it had tapped its credit line as short-term financing markets stall.</p>
<p>Several other chains, particularly <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-mcclatchy-company/mni/nys">McClatchy</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-mcclatchy-company/mni/nys">MNI</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/gatehouse-media-inc/ghs/nys">Gatehouse</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/gatehouse-media-inc/ghs/nys">GHS</a>) are having crippling debt problems.</p>
<p>A number of media sources reported yesterday that the The Star Tribune in Minneapolis has missed a payment on its debt.</p>
<p>Although it is hard to imagine, some of these companies may fail and fail soon. The costs of newsprint, trucks, gas, and personnel are so great that a number of newspapers may complete shut down. Customers may wake up one morning and find the front step empty. The poor newspaper boy has lost his job.</p>
<p>It is a hard time when there is nothing to put in the bird cage.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/02/your-newspaper-wont-be-delivered-today-or-ever/">Your newspaper won't be delivered today, or ever</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 02 Oct 2008 10:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122290934833096645.html?mod=testMod>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/02/your-newspaper-wont-be-delivered-today-or-ever/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1330822/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/02/your-newspaper-wont-be-delivered-today-or-ever/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>GCI</category><category>GHS</category><category>inthenews</category><category>MNI</category><category>newspaper industry</category><category>newspaper publishers</category><category>NewspaperIndustry</category><category>NewspaperPublishers</category><category>newspapers</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 10:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Tribune gets subprime financing for buyout]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/25/tribune-gets-subprime-financing-for-buyout/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/25/tribune-gets-subprime-financing-for-buyout/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/25/tribune-gets-subprime-financing-for-buyout/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/privateequity/" rel="tag">Private Equity</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/trb/" rel="tag">Tribune Co. (TRB)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/05/trb.bmp" alt="" /> It looks like the complex $8.2 billion buyout deal for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/tribune-company/trb/nys">Tribune Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/tribune-company/trb/nys">TRB</a>) is progressing.<br /><br />This week, the company's shareholders <a href="http://digital50.com/news/items/PR/2007/05/25/AQF034/tribune-announces-preliminary-results-of-tender-offer.html">tendered</a> 222 million shares. Keep in mind that Tribune was looking for about 126 million shares. Although, if I was a shareholder, I would want to get out, too.<br /><br />But there's a problem. The company had to agree to some draconian financing arrangements to get the deal done. This is according to a report in <a href="http://www.wsj.com"><em>The Wall Street Journal</em></a> [a paid service].<br /><br />Tribune has issued about $7 billion in debt (yes, this deal's almost <em>all </em>debt). However, the debt markets were not so easy. <br /><br />Tribune not only had to up its interest rates but also sell notes at a discount. In fact, Wall Street advisers had to forgo some fees. <br /><br />It's too early to know if this is a sign that credit markets are generally getting tougher. But as for Tribune, the company still will need to raise $4 billion more in financing at the end of 2007. So, if credit markets get tougher, the financing may get even more onerous. <br /><br />Today, Tribune's stock price fell 2.77% to $32.28.<br /><br /><em>Tom Taulli is the author of various books, including the Complete M&amp;A Handbook and the EDGAR-Online Guide to Decoding Financial Statements.</em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/25/tribune-gets-subprime-financing-for-buyout/">Tribune gets subprime financing for buyout</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 25 May 2007 12:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/25/tribune-gets-subprime-financing-for-buyout/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/904031/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/25/tribune-gets-subprime-financing-for-buyout/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Buyout debt</category><category>BuyoutDebt</category><category>media industry</category><category>MediaIndustry</category><category>newspaper industry</category><category>NewspaperIndustry</category><category>subprime financing</category><category>SubprimeFinancing</category><category>TRB</category><category>Tribune Co.</category><category>TribuneCo.</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 12:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Chicago to LA Times: drop dead]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/07/chicago-to-la-times-drop-dead/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/07/chicago-to-la-times-drop-dead/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/07/chicago-to-la-times-drop-dead/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/trb/" rel="tag">Tribune Co. (TRB)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="la times" id="vimage_1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/11/latimes_lizbeth.jpg" />I just heard that Dean Baquet, the editor of the <em>Los Angeles Times</em>, <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/baquet-resigns-as-editor-of-la-times/n20061107175709990002">has been pushed out by his Chicago-based overlords</a> because he refused to oversee any more staff cuts. </p>
<p>Well, all of us members of the Fourth Estate, past and present, saw this coming. It's just another ill tiding for the newspaper industry.</p>
<p>The Tribune Company (NYSE:TRB), owners of the <em>Chicago Tribune</em> (and lots of other media outlets), own the <em>Los Angeles Times</em>. It's been relentless in its pursuit of profits, slashing staff and other resources. It's slowly starving its brand by trying to wring every last penny of profit out of its business. And when was the newspaper business ever a money-making operation?</p>
<p>Yes, the newspaper industry is dying. Yes, more people get their news now from the Internet or TV. Yes, advertising revenue has tanked, again thanks to the Internet. I'll even hazard to say there won't be newspapers as we know them in 20 years time. But it ain't dead yet. There are still millions of people who get a newspaper every day, for whatever reason. And those people want a good product. The <span style="font-style: italic;">Los Angeles Times</span> was a good product. A great brand. </p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/07/chicago-to-la-times-drop-dead/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Chicago to LA Times: drop dead</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/07/chicago-to-la-times-drop-dead/">Chicago to LA Times: drop dead</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 07 Nov 2006 19:25:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/07/chicago-to-la-times-drop-dead/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/697990/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/07/chicago-to-la-times-drop-dead/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>baquet</category><category>chicago tribune</category><category>ChicagoTribune</category><category>dean</category><category>dean baquet</category><category>DeanBaquet</category><category>editor</category><category>la times</category><category>LaTimes</category><category>los angeles times</category><category>LosAngelesTimes</category><category>newspaper</category><category>newspaper industry</category><category>NewspaperIndustry</category><category>the tribune company</category><category>TheTribuneCompany</category><category>times</category><category>trb</category><category>tribune</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Julie Tilsner]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 19:25:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
