nextel posts
FeedPosted Nov 8th 2008 3:40PM by Trey Thoelcke (RSS feed)
Filed under: Earnings reports, Ford Motor (F), Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A), Toyota Motor Corp. (TM), Walt Disney (DIS), Sprint Nextel Corp (S), Archer-Daniels-Midland (ADM), MasterCard Inc'A' (MA), Dean Foods (DF), Goldman Sachs Group (GS), Blackstone Group L.P (BX), Potash Corp. of Saskatchewan (POT)
Here are some highlights from this past week's earnings coverage from BloggingStocks:
Continue reading Earnings highlights: Ford, Toyota, Goldman Sachs, Disney, Sprint, ADM and others
Posted May 17th 2008 9:40AM by Trey Thoelcke (RSS feed)
Filed under: Earnings reports, Wal-Mart (WMT), Home Depot (HD), , Sirius Satellite Radio (SIRI), Sprint Nextel Corp (S), Sony Corp ADR (SNE), Penney (J.C.) (JCP), Blockbuster Inc 'A' (BBI), Whole Foods Market (WFMI), Tiffany and Co (TIF), Amer Intl Group (AIG), Lowe's Cos (LOW), Kohl's Corp (KSS), Electronic Arts (ERTS), Nordstrom, Inc (JWN), Liz Claiborne (LIZ), Nissan Motors (NSANY)
Here are some highlights from this past week's earnings coverage from BloggingStocks:
Continue reading Earnings highlights: Wal-Mart, Macy's, Sony, Sprint, Sirius, Whole Foods and others
Posted May 11th 2008 3:10PM by Trey Thoelcke (RSS feed)
Filed under: Earnings reports, Forecasts, Rumors, Sprint Nextel Corp (S)
Despite Sprint Nextel Corp.'s (NYSE: S) share price being down more than 50% in the past year, shares were up 7.5% last week -- up 46.5% in the past montyh -- on all the buzz surrounding Sprint lately. There are rumors that Deutsche Telekom (NYSE: DT) may buyout Sprint and merge it into T Mobile. Then there were rumors that Sprint may spin off Nextel (i.e., undo its troubled merger). And there's the excitment around a joint venture with Clearwire Corp. (NASDAQ: CLWR) to create a high-speed wireless internet network that covers most of the U.S.
But when Sprint reports its first-quarter results tomorrow, analysts polled by Thomson Financial expect the company to report earnings of a mere penny per share, down from the same period in 2007 when it earned 18 cents per share, and from the previous quarter's 21 cents per share. The company has beat quarterly estimates over the past year -- by 17.3% in the fourth quarter -- and it certainly has plenty of room to best analysts' low expectations for this past quarter.
Overland Park, Kansas-based Sprint Nextel operates a nationwide digital wireless network with more than 50 million subscribers. In the past year, Sprint's revenues were $40.1 billion. The company's long-term EPS growth forecast is 8.22%, which is less than the 8.67% of rival Verizon (NYSE: VZ) and the S&P 500. The consensus recommendation of analysts continues to be to hold Sprint.
Shares closed Friday at $9.39, up from a 52-week low of $5.48 in March, but still well off the 52-week high of 23.42 last June.
For news that could influence these results, see BloggingStocks' Sprint coverage.
Posted May 6th 2008 6:10PM by Tom Taulli (RSS feed)
Filed under: Google (GOOG), Intel (INTC), Sprint Nextel Corp (S)
There's been lots of buzz with Sprint Nextel Corporation (NYSE: S) lately. And it's to be expected -- in light of the intense competition, heavy customer churn, and the ailing stock price. For example, there were rumors that Deutsche Telekom is mulling a buyout of Sprint. Another possibility is that the company will unwind its Nextel merger.
Such things may happen. But, in the meantime, it looks like there may be another mega deal. According to a piece in the Wall Street Journal [a paid publication], it looks like Sprint is about to announce a $12 billion joint venture with Clearwire Corporation (NASDAQ: CLWR). Some of the key investors would include Google, Inc. (NASDAQ: GOOG) and Intel Corporation (NASDAQ: INTC).
Essentially, the new entity will roll-out a massive footprint for high-speed wireless Net access. No doubt, such a thing would be a nice thing for Google -- which needs a stronger mobile strategy -- as well as Intel, which needs to sell more chips. In other words, it's ideal for a multi-billion dollar cash call.
As for Sprint, this deal looks like a must-have. In other words, it will provide a differentiator in the tough marketplace.
There are still some big-time risks. After all, coordinating a project among a variety of heavyweights is never easy to manage.
Tom Taulli is the author of various books, including The Complete M&A Handbook
and The Edgar Online Guide to Decoding Financial Statements
. He also operates MergerBook.com.
Posted May 6th 2008 8:00AM by Laurie Pasternack (RSS feed)
Filed under: Newspapers, Magazines, Google (GOOG), Yahoo! (YHOO), Citigroup Inc. (C), Sprint Nextel Corp (S), News Corp'B' (NWS)
MAJOR PAPERS:
- Three years into its $35B takeover of Nextel, the Wall Street Journal reported that Sprint Nextel Corporation (NYSE: S) is considering selling or spinning off the troubled unit. Few details were available and a deal is not imminent.
- The Wall Street Journal also reported that pressure is mounting on Citigroup Incorporated's (NYSE: C) CEO Vikram Pandit to show that he can turn around the troubled bank. Executives believe Pandit, who has been praised for his cautious and deliberate approach, has been taking "too long" to make crucial decisions.
WEB SITES:
- According to a person close to Google Inc (NASDAQ: GOOG), Reuters reported that Google and Yahoo! Inc (NASDAQ: YHOO) are still "hammering out the intricacies" of a potential advertising and search deal. The source said no final agreement has been reached yet.
- ABC News learned that if Rupert Murdoch does not testify in a lawsuit accusing one of his companies of "corporate espionage," it may cost News Corporation (NYSE: NWS) hundreds of millions of dollars, a federal judge overseeing the trial said. News Corp has denied any wrongdoing, and lawyers maintain Murdoch had no direct knowledge of the unit's alleged hacking into EchoStar Corporation's (NASDAQ: SATS)/DISH Network Corporation's (NASDAQ: DISH) security code and posting it on the Internet.
Posted Apr 2nd 2008 12:00PM by Steven Halpern (RSS feed)
Filed under: Newsletters, Sprint Nextel Corp (S), Stocks to Buy
"Despite a host of near-term issues, Sprint (NYSE: S) has many of the attributes we look for in a turnaround stock: a solid core business, well-known brands, new management, manageable cash flow and even an activist shareholder to stir things up," notes George Putnam, III.
In his industry-leading The Turnaround Letter, the advisor looks expert at the firm, which he notes traces it roots back to the Brown Telephone Company in Kansas in 1899.
"When the long-distance market was opened to competition in the early 1980's, Sprint moved in aggressively. In early 2005, Sprint acquired Nextel, which had become a major wireless competitor with its innovative 'push to talk' technology that combines elements of the walkie talkie and the cell phone.
"The $35 billion transaction was supposed to vault Sprint into the leadership of the wireless market. Unfortunately, the combined company stumbled. Difficulty in integrating the two companies led to poor customer service which drove some consumers away.
"Investors, who had initially applauded the Nextel acquisition, pushing the stock above $27 in mid-2005, became concerned, and the stock has been in a steady decline for the past two-and-a-half years. And the company's poor earnings report on February 28 further discouraged Wall Street.
Continue reading Turnaround expert rings up Sprint (S)
Posted Feb 1st 2008 9:19AM by Zac Bissonnette (RSS feed)
Filed under: Earnings reports, Deals, Sprint Nextel Corp (S)

It looks like
Sprint's (NYSE:
S) 2005 merger with Nextel Communications will end the way that a disturbing number of mega-deals end: with a massive write-off.
Sprint announced yesterday that it may
write off as much as $31 billion related to the deal -- a move that could eliminate all the goodwill the company recorded for the merger.
The write-off would be far larger than the headline-making subprime-related moves that derailed shares of the major banks. But shares of Sprint didn't budge on the news.
Why? It's already well-known that the Nextel deal was an unmitigated disaster. The goodwill may still be on the balance sheet but it has no value. It's an asset that everyone has already written off mentally.
Sprint said that the charge wouldn't affect the company's cash position or effects its deals with lenders.
The deal for Nextel cost Sprint $35 billion, meaning that the company completely wasted at least $34 billion of that amount, and everyone can already tell less than 3 years after it went down. That has to make it one of the worst M&A moves in history.
Hey,
at least they didn't buy WorldCom.
Posted Nov 25th 2007 4:10PM by Trey Thoelcke (RSS feed)
Filed under: Marketing and advertising
It seems Chicago, home of Wrigley Field and the Sears Tower, has hired a marketing firm to explore the potential of offering naming rights to public property, programs, and other assets as a way of raising revenue. The city hopes to begin attracting corporate sponsors as soon as next spring. Any proposed sponsorship will have to be approved by an advisory committee made up of civic leaders, whose job it will be to ensure the integrity of the city's brand image.
Chicago isn't the only city to consider offering naming rights. New York has partnerships with Verizon Communications (NYSE: VZ), and Pepsico (NYSE: PEP), and the Las Vegas monorail is sponsored by Nextel (NYSE: S). Winnipeg, Calgary, and Toronto also have similar programs.
Chicago is no stranger to naming rights issues. The city has already attempted to sell naming rights to the Chicago Skyway, which links the city to the Indiana Tollway. Many White Sox fans decried the name change of New Comiskey Park to U.S. Cellular Field, and an attempt to sell the name of Solider Field ultimately went nowhere. Many Windy City shoppers still haven't forgiven Macy's Inc. (NYSE: M) for changing the name of State Street institution, Marshall Fields.
But Chicago hasn't yet found itself in the embarrassing situation that Houston did after the naming of Enron Field. I wonder if there was an advisory committee to protect the integrity of Houston's brand image?
Posted Nov 12th 2007 8:20AM by Douglas McIntyre (RSS feed)
Filed under: Deals, Rumors, Competitive strategy, Google (GOOG), Sprint Nextel Corp (S)
There is probably a rumor a day about Google (NASDAQ: GOOG) picked up in the media. The latest one is that the huge search company will buy No. 3 wireless firm Sprint (NYSE: S). Tech industry website TMCNet says that it has heard that Google may just buy Sprint outright.
The story may sound nuts, but there is a tiny chance there is some fact buried in there. Google could certainly use the blueprints of Sprint's WiMax network and fund the $5 billion build-out to create a national wireless high speed network. It would probably be cheaper than bidding for wireless spectrum from the FCC.
And, any deal would give Google access to Sprint's 50 million plus wireless customers. That could offer the new Google handset software a massive distribution advantage.
Is the rumor true? Who knows. It could send Sprint's stock up for a day or two.
Douglas A. McIntyre is a editor at 247wallst.com.
Posted Nov 5th 2007 3:04PM by Brian White (RSS feed)
Filed under: Consumer experience, AT and T (T), Sprint Nextel Corp (S)
Sprint Nextel Corp. (NYSE:
S) can't seem to climb out of its funk. The company continues to lose customers to the competition, it ousted its CEO a month ago, and the customer service rap the wireless carrier gets from just about all the media I see is atrocious. It's no wonder the third-largest wireless company gets smacked around more than a well-played racquetball.
To set the record straight, I am a Sprint customer. After having tried the other national wireless carriers, the one that just works best for my family is Sprint. Let me preface this by saying YMMV (your mileage may vary). The phone I use, the clarity of every voice conversation, the roaming capability I have nationwide and the data features I receive all work pretty flawlessly and have for some time. And the cost is very reasonable. When I've emailed Sprint customer service for questions and changes to anything on my account, responses typically take no more than 18 hours and aren't canned replies -- they are written to answer my questions, not pawn me off to a website for help.
So, it's interesting to see that Sprint receives such a bad rap these days. In my experience over a few years, the company's products, service and support are top-notch. I cannot say that about my experience with T-Mobile (NYSE: DT) or Cingular, now AT&T (NYSE: T). Dropped calls with those providers were normal, and the value was just not there for what Sprint supplies. Things may have changed since 2005, of course.
Continue reading Why isn't Sprint racking up more customers?
Posted Oct 8th 2007 6:11PM by Sarah Gilbert (RSS feed)
Filed under: Bad news, Management, Sprint Nextel Corp (S)
It can't be a good thing when a CEO resigns without even the pretense of "spending more time with his family." Sprint-Nextel Corporation (NYSE: S) CEO Gary Forsee has been the focus of investor and analyst anger for some time now; on Friday, the Wall Street Journal reported Sprint management was searching for his replacement and recently, he was targeted by activist investor Ralph Whitworth. In September, Eric Buscemi wondered if his time had run out thanks to his Failure to Turnaround. A whole year following the company's purchase of Nextel, integration was still questionable and EBITDA was forecasted to be billions lower than expected.
According to a statement from Sprint, CFO Paul Saleh will serve as interim CEO while the board finds (finishes finding?) a new CEO. Interestingly, Sprint says it is targeting candidates outside the company. And in what seems to be a "might as well dish all our dirt at once" move, Sprint said it was forecasting a third-quarter net loss of 337,000 post-paid subscribers (the ones who have annual contracts and pay their bills each month).
The news was already cheering up investors; after a nasty drop of 51 cents, or 2.68%, to $18.50 on the day, the stock was up in after-hours trading to $19.05; erasing all the day's losses and then some. The company's stock is near a two-year low.
Posted Sep 26th 2007 11:00AM by Brian White (RSS feed)
Filed under: Rumors, Competitive strategy, Sprint Nextel Corp (S)
Sprint Nextel Corp. (NYSE:
S) seems to be in a bit of a quandary these days. The company can't seem to keep up the wireless subscriber growth like larger rivals Verizon Wireless (partly owned by
Verizon Comunications (NYSE:
VZ)) and
AT&T, Inc. (NYSE:
T). The company still is the third-largest wireless carrier in the U.S. and has
nearly completed merging Nextel's operations two years after the merger occurred.
But all is not over with the company and the way it needs to find more customer growth. Sprint Nextel CEO Gary Foresee said that the company may be offering a
calling plan to customers that does not require a contractual agreement. For millions of people, this would be a huge calling. After all, many wireless customers don't go there either due to shaky credit histories or a hatred for signing long-term contracts. Instead, they choose pre-paid plans and phones, which generally don't have near the predictive revenue of a calling plan under an annual contract.
Smaller regional wireless carriers
Leap Wireless International (NASDAQ:
LEAP) and
Metro PCS (NYSE:
PCS) already offer unlimited calling plans (no peak time nonsense), and if Sprint were to enter this field -- and market it correctly -- it would have a chance to heavily add to its subscriber base. Specifically, customers would have the unlimited calling plan for as long as it was affordable to them. Don't want it any longer? Dump it and move on. That prospect alone sounds enticing to many, I'd be willing to wager. However, with such an enticing service offering, Sprint would need to clearly point out any limitations and focus on that information as a 'value-added' prospect for customers. If the company ends up doing this, and doing it right, it could have a large winner on its hands.
Posted Sep 21st 2007 3:13PM by Brian White (RSS feed)
Filed under: Rumors, Products and services, Sprint Nextel Corp (S)
Sprint Nextel Corp. (NYSE:
S) really does no worse compared to all the other major national wireless carriers, in my opinion. The company offers several cutting-edge wireless handsets, was one of the very first to offer 3G wireless data (and offers excellent pricing on those services) and has a solid brand behind it.
What Sprint Nextel does not have includes a strong consumer message, a customer service quality-oriented reputation or the subscriber growth enjoyed by its larger competitors,
AT&T, Inc. (NYSE:
T) and
Verizon Communications, Inc.'s (NYSE:
VZ) Verizon Wireless. Oh yeah, Sprint and Nextel are still two different companies. Well, from a pundit's viewpoint, that is.
When Sprint announced it was
merging with Nextel over two years ago, many a watcher were probably wondering how two companies that focused on completely different customer bases and with completely incompatible wireless technologies were going to fare as one unit. Well, it's two years later, and current Sprint Nextel chief Gary Foresee is now saying they are about 80% done blending the two companies together. Maybe we'll see 100% sometime at the start of 2009.
Continue reading Sprint Nextel's (S) Gary Foresee: Combined company 'almost blended'
Posted Jun 28th 2007 10:30AM by Brian White (RSS feed)
Filed under: Rumors, Consumer experience, Rants and raves, AT and T (T), Sprint Nextel Corp (S)
I suspect that mobile powerhouses Sprint and Nextel merged into
Sprint Nextel (NYSE:
S) just to keep the combined customer count in line with larger competitors Verizon Wireless and
AT&T (NYSE:
T). When the two companies merged over two years ago in the face of those two larger companies, many industry analysts believed that combining Sprint and Nextel would derive cost savings and many other benefits -- as well are combining the entire customer count of both companies into one entity. But Sprint apparently did not get the memo.
The merger has been successful from one perspective, but has been disastrous from just about any other angle. Yes, the two companies did combine brands, marketing and customer counts. But former Nextel subscribers have left by the hundreds of thousands, Sprint has not grown its collective customer base anywhere near like its larger rivals and for some reason, the company
has kept the Sprint and Nextel customer bases separate. Even calling the company for support can send you down the wrong path, as in "you're a Nextel customer, and this is Sprint support -- please call another number." Inspiring to a customer? Hardly. And it's been two years.
Perhaps the company is making strides, but looking at a few recent quarters, it sure would not seem so from the financial and customer results. Maybe Sprint has heard the message, as the company appears to be jettisoning the Nextel name from its branding efforts in almost every way that matters. While it will keep the brand for customers looking specifically for the famous Nextel "walkie talkie" feature, it's pretty bad to think that the Nextel name -- which fetched $35 billion from Sprint -- is
being dropped from almost all marketing efforts by the Overland Park, Kansas, company. What was the benefit of the merger, then? Customer scale and efficiency -- but with two incompatible technical networks and a disastrous strategy of co-branding and Nextel customer service that prompted a huge gob of customers to leave. Now that's success.
Not! Let's hope Sprint's re-branding efforts re-invent the company's bottom line as the Nextel name barely clings to life from this point on.
Next Page >