<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[U.S. Stock Futures Up as Investors Await Jobs Report]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/04/u-s-stock-futures-up-as-investors-await-jobs-report/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/04/u-s-stock-futures-up-as-investors-await-jobs-report/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/04/u-s-stock-futures-up-as-investors-await-jobs-report/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/before-the-bell/" rel="tag">Before the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/novl/" rel="tag">Novell Inc (NOVL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mrvl/" rel="tag">Marvell Technology Group (MRVL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/currency/" rel="tag">Currency</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/bell-green.jpg"  alt="" />U.S. stock futures are higher Friday morning as investors await non-farm payroll data for February. Futures on the Dow Jones Industrial Average surged 32 points to 12,271.00 and futures on the S&amp;P 500 stock index gained 2.80 points to 1,332.50. Nasdaq 100 futures rose 5 points to 2,376.75.<br />
<br />
U.S. stocks closed higher, with the blue-chip Dow index surging 1.59%, or 191.40, to close at 12,258 on Thursday.<br />
<br />
The jobs report for February will be released at 8:30 a.m. ET. Data on factory orders for January will be released at 10 a.m. ET.<br />
<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/04/u-s-stock-futures-up-as-investors-await-jobs-report/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>U.S. Stock Futures Up as Investors Await Jobs Report</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/04/u-s-stock-futures-up-as-investors-await-jobs-report/">U.S. Stock Futures Up as Investors Await Jobs Report</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 04 Mar 2011 08:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/04/u-s-stock-futures-up-as-investors-await-jobs-report/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19868010/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/04/u-s-stock-futures-up-as-investors-await-jobs-report/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>employment</category><category>featured</category><category>jobs report</category><category>marvell earnings</category><category>mrvl</category><category>nonfarm payroll</category><category>novell earnings</category><category>novl</category><category>walmart earnings</category><category>WalmartEarnings</category><category>wmt</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Raznick]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 08:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Jobs Report Falls Short, Pushing Stocks Lower]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/03/jobs-report-falls-short-pushing-stocks-lower/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/03/jobs-report-falls-short-pushing-stocks-lower/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/03/jobs-report-falls-short-pushing-stocks-lower/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt=""  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/california_unemployed.jpg" />The Labor Department threw the market a curve today when it reported nonfarm payrolls data for November. Employers added only 39,000 jobs in November, far below the 144,000 job growth economist had anticipated. The unemployment rate, too, rose to a seven-month high of 9.8%, up from 9.6% in October.<br />
<br />
Markets reacted instantly. The Dow Jones Industrial Average futures fell 54 point to 11,310, and the S&amp;P futures slid 7 points, <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703989004575652371594667484.html?mod=WSJ_hp_MIDDLETopStories"><em>The Wall Street Journal</em></a> reported. Treasuries moved up, with the yield on the 10-year note declining to 2.94%. <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/03/jobs-report-falls-short-pushing-stocks-lower/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Jobs Report Falls Short, Pushing Stocks Lower</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/03/jobs-report-falls-short-pushing-stocks-lower/">Jobs Report Falls Short, Pushing Stocks Lower</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 03 Dec 2010 10:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703989004575652371594667484.html?mod=WSJ_hp_MIDDLETopStories>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/03/jobs-report-falls-short-pushing-stocks-lower/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19743353/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/03/jobs-report-falls-short-pushing-stocks-lower/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>employment</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jobs</category><category>labor department</category><category>nonfarm payroll</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 10:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Payroll Data Sets Bearish Tone for the Trading Day]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/06/payroll-data-sets-bearish-tone-for-the-trading-day/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/06/payroll-data-sets-bearish-tone-for-the-trading-day/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/06/payroll-data-sets-bearish-tone-for-the-trading-day/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/04/dol-logo-1270224022.jpg" alt="Labor Department seal" />Many were expecting good news out of the Labor Department when it released the nonfarm payroll report for July. Unfortunately, this wasn't the case -- and the morning has taken a decidedly bearish tone.</p>
<p>According to the Labor Department, <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/careers/employers-shed-131-000-jobs-in-july/19583683/" target="_blank">131,000 jobs were lost during the month</a>. The drop was attributed to the fact that 143,000 Census-related jobs were cut. Analysts expected overall employment to absorb the number of temporary jobs cut and show a drop of 65,000. When revising payrolls for May and June the picture turned even bleaker. The Labor Department revised the reading for those two months lower by 97,000, meaning fewer jobs than originally thought were created.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/06/payroll-data-sets-bearish-tone-for-the-trading-day/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Payroll Data Sets Bearish Tone for the Trading Day</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/06/payroll-data-sets-bearish-tone-for-the-trading-day/">Payroll Data Sets Bearish Tone for the Trading Day</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 06 Aug 2010 10:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/06/payroll-data-sets-bearish-tone-for-the-trading-day/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19583673/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/06/payroll-data-sets-bearish-tone-for-the-trading-day/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economic recovery</category><category>employment</category><category>inthenews</category><category>job report</category><category>jobs</category><category>nonfarm payroll</category><category>payroll</category><category>payroll data</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 10:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Jobless Claims Data Cast a Bearish Tone]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/05/jobless-claims-unexpectedly-rise/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/05/jobless-claims-unexpectedly-rise/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/05/jobless-claims-unexpectedly-rise/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="initial jobless claims" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/01/unemployed.jpg" />Investors and economists received a rather nasty surprise this morning when the Labor Department released its weekly data on initial claims for jobless benefits. According to the Labor Department, new claims for unemployment insurance <a target="_blank" href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/jobless-claims-rise-19000-to-479000-2010-08-05">rose by 19,000 last week to a seasonally adjusted 479,000</a>.</p>
<p>The government did note that some of the surprise increase (a small decrease was expected) may be attributed to difficulties the government has in adjusting for seasonal factors. The four-week average of initial claims increased by 5,250 to 452,250.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/05/jobless-claims-unexpectedly-rise/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Jobless Claims Data Cast a Bearish Tone</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/05/jobless-claims-unexpectedly-rise/">Jobless Claims Data Cast a Bearish Tone</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 05 Aug 2010 11:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/05/jobless-claims-unexpectedly-rise/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19582118/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/05/jobless-claims-unexpectedly-rise/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economic data</category><category>economic news</category><category>employment</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jobless</category><category>market direction</category><category>nonfarm payroll</category><category>stock market</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 11:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[U.S. Private Sector Jobs Increase During July]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/04/private-sector-jobs-increase-in-july/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/04/private-sector-jobs-increase-in-july/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/04/private-sector-jobs-increase-in-july/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="help wanted sign" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/02/help-wanted.jpg" />According to the ADP employment payroll report released Wednesday morning, private-sector employment in the United States <a target="_blank" href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/us-july-adp-employment-up-42000-2010-08-04-822390?dist=beforebell">increased by 42,000</a>. This data is a precursor to Friday's nonfarm payroll report, which is expected to show a decline of 60,000. July's increase was the sixth straight increase.</p>
<p>With experts predicting a drop of 60,000 jobs, I have one major concern. According to the article, analysts are expecting an increase of 96,000 jobs in the private sector. But the private sector (while it did report an increase) reported far fewer than 96,000 added jobs.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/04/private-sector-jobs-increase-in-july/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>U.S. Private Sector Jobs Increase During July</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/04/private-sector-jobs-increase-in-july/">U.S. Private Sector Jobs Increase During July</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 04 Aug 2010 11:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/04/private-sector-jobs-increase-in-july/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19580556/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/04/private-sector-jobs-increase-in-july/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>adp payroll report</category><category>employment</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jobs</category><category>jobs data</category><category>nonfarm payroll</category><category>private sector jobs</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 11:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Temporary Census Jobs Drive May's Hiring Increase]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/04/may-nonfarm-payroll-report/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/04/may-nonfarm-payroll-report/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/04/may-nonfarm-payroll-report/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/02/unemployment.jpg" alt="jobs" />This morning's nonfarm payroll report was a good news/bad news sort of situation. The good news? The nation <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/article/payrolls-up-431000-lifted-by-census/719129/" target="_blank">added 431,000 jobs last month</a>. The bad news? Of those jobs, 411,000 were added thanks to the Census, <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/hiring-weak-in-may-except-for-census-workers-2010-06-04" target="n">meaning they were temporary workers</a>.</p>
<p>In reality, payrolls advanced by 20,000 during May (taking the temporary jobs out of the equation), a rather disappointing number (and far short of the expected increase of 540,000).</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/04/may-nonfarm-payroll-report/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Temporary Census Jobs Drive May's Hiring Increase</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/04/may-nonfarm-payroll-report/">Temporary Census Jobs Drive May's Hiring Increase</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 04 Jun 2010 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/04/may-nonfarm-payroll-report/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19503345/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/04/may-nonfarm-payroll-report/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>nonfarm</category><category>nonfarm payroll</category><category>payroll</category><category>payroll data</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[ADP Jobs Data Casts a Bearish Shadow]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/31/adp-jobs-data-casts-a-bearish-shadow/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/31/adp-jobs-data-casts-a-bearish-shadow/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/31/adp-jobs-data-casts-a-bearish-shadow/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/adp-logo-240.jpg" />Just when it seemed it was going so well, the ADP employment report demonstrated this morning that we have perhaps allowed our hopes to get too high. Expectations called for a gain of 40,000 jobs when the March ADP data was released, that was not the case. Rather than the gain, we were treated to the rather sour <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/march-adp-shows-continued-job-losses-2010-03-31" target="_blank">surprise of a drop of 23,000 jobs</a>. In reaction to this news, the Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped more than 40 points lower in the first hour of trading.</p>
<p>That said, this may just be a temporary glitch in the jobs picture (I stress the term <em>temporary</em>). The ADP does not take government jobs into account, nor does it effectively "capture changes in the weather." Experts note that a surge in employees thanks to the 2010 Census should help the March payroll data. For this reason, the nonfarm payroll data released on Friday is expected to reflect a gain of 189,000 jobs.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/31/adp-jobs-data-casts-a-bearish-shadow/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>ADP Jobs Data Casts a Bearish Shadow</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/31/adp-jobs-data-casts-a-bearish-shadow/">ADP Jobs Data Casts a Bearish Shadow</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 31 Mar 2010 10:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/31/adp-jobs-data-casts-a-bearish-shadow/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19421321/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/31/adp-jobs-data-casts-a-bearish-shadow/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ADP</category><category>employment</category><category>employment data</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>nonfarm payroll</category><category>nonfarm payrolls</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 10:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Unemployment Held Steady in February]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/05/unemployment-held-steady-in-february/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/05/unemployment-held-steady-in-february/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/05/unemployment-held-steady-in-february/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/before-the-bell/" rel="tag">Before the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/california_unemployed.jpg" alt="" />For the 25th time in the past 26 months, <a href="http://www.aolnews.com/story/unemployment-rate-unchanged-as-36k-jobs/719129" target="_blank">U.S. nonfarm payrolls fell during February</a>. The Labor Department announced that 36,000 jobs were lost during February, lower than the expected figure of 50,000. The unemployment rate remained at 9.7%, which was better than expectations the rate would rise to 9.8%. <br />
<br />
Perhaps all of the government's pre-report hand wringing over the impact of the snowstorms was unwarranted. Some economists believed that the storms could have inflated job losses by 100,000 or more. If the storms indeed caused such losses, it would mean there was a net gain of jobs last month. An increase would have been the second increase since the recession started back in December 2007.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/05/unemployment-held-steady-in-february/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Unemployment Held Steady in February</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/05/unemployment-held-steady-in-february/">Unemployment Held Steady in February</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 05 Mar 2010 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/05/unemployment-held-steady-in-february/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19384708/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/05/unemployment-held-steady-in-february/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>blizard</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jobless claims</category><category>Labor Department</category><category>nonfarm payroll</category><category>snowstorm</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Surprise Drop in the Unemployment Rate Is No Reason to Celebrate]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/05/surprise-drop-in-the-unemployment-rate-is-no-reason-to-celebrate/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/05/surprise-drop-in-the-unemployment-rate-is-no-reason-to-celebrate/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/05/surprise-drop-in-the-unemployment-rate-is-no-reason-to-celebrate/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/01/jobboard18.jpg" alt="job board" />Well, this was a nice surprise ... the unemployment rate <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/us-jan-jobless-rate-falls-to-97-low-since-aug-2010-02-05-830260" target="_blank">fell to 9.7%</a> in January from 10% in December, according to the Labor Department. This is good news, as expectations were for the unemployment rate to hold at 10% -- so some people are finding some jobs somewhere.<p>
That said, the number of nonfarm payrolls dropped by 20,000 while expectations called for a gain of 25,000. With stock futures limiting some of their early morning losses, it looks as if investors and analysts are holding on to the unemployment rate news rather than the news that more jobs were lost than expected.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/05/surprise-drop-in-the-unemployment-rate-is-no-reason-to-celebrate/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Surprise Drop in the Unemployment Rate Is No Reason to Celebrate</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/05/surprise-drop-in-the-unemployment-rate-is-no-reason-to-celebrate/">Surprise Drop in the Unemployment Rate Is No Reason to Celebrate</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 05 Feb 2010 11:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/05/surprise-drop-in-the-unemployment-rate-is-no-reason-to-celebrate/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19346306/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/05/surprise-drop-in-the-unemployment-rate-is-no-reason-to-celebrate/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>nonfarm payroll</category><category>payroll</category><category>unemployment</category><category>unemployment rate</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 11:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Private Sector Jobs Drop to Two-Year Low]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/03/private-sector-jobs-drop-to-two-year-low/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/03/private-sector-jobs-drop-to-two-year-low/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/03/private-sector-jobs-drop-to-two-year-low/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/adp-logo-240.jpg"  alt="" />Private-sector firms in the United States <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/private-sector-sheds-22000-jobs-in-jan-adp-says-2010-02-03">cut 22,000 jobs in January</a>, according to ADP data. This is the 24th straight monthly decline in job losses. The 22,000 jobs lost was the fewest since January 2008, when 22,000 jobs were added. Digging into the report, the service sector actually added 38,000 jobs, while good-producing industries slashed 60,000. ADP added that 7.5 million private-sector jobs have been lost thus far during the recession.<br />
<br />
This data comes two days before the Bureau of Labor Statistics reports its estimate of January nonfarm payrolls. Forecasts call for an addition of 25,000 jobs, but the unemployment rate is expected to stay at 10%.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/03/private-sector-jobs-drop-to-two-year-low/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Private Sector Jobs Drop to Two-Year Low</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/03/private-sector-jobs-drop-to-two-year-low/">Private Sector Jobs Drop to Two-Year Low</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 03 Feb 2010 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/03/private-sector-jobs-drop-to-two-year-low/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19343018/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/03/private-sector-jobs-drop-to-two-year-low/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ADP</category><category>inthenews</category><category>nonfarm payroll</category><category>nonfarm payrolls</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Jobless rate jumps to 10.2% during October]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/jobless-rate-jumps-to-10-2-during-october/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/jobless-rate-jumps-to-10-2-during-october/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/jobless-rate-jumps-to-10-2-during-october/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/before-the-bell/" rel="tag">Before the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/11/jobless_claims.jpg" />Is this bad news for the recovery? The Labor Department reported that the U.S. unemployment rate jumped to 10.2% in October, pushing the rate atop the <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story//unemployment-rate-hits-102-in-october-2009-11-06-83100">10% mark for the first time in 26 years</a>. Nonfarm payrolls fell by 190,000 in October, bringing the total number of jobs sacrificed to the recession to 7.3 million. October was the 22nd straight month that saw payrolls decline. According to MarketWatch, expectations were for an unemployment rate of 10% and 150,000 jobs lost. <br /><br />Yesterday, I took a look at the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/05/jobless-claims-drop-during-the-last-week-of-october/">weekly jobless claims</a>, suggesting that we could see a substantial drop today if this morning's jobs report came in worse than expected. The report was worse, now let's see if yesterday's "good news" and rally is going to give way to a slump like last Friday. <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/jobless-rate-jumps-to-10-2-during-october/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Jobless rate jumps to 10.2% during October</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/jobless-rate-jumps-to-10-2-during-october/">Jobless rate jumps to 10.2% during October</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 06 Nov 2009 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/jobless-rate-jumps-to-10-2-during-october/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19226337/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/06/jobless-rate-jumps-to-10-2-during-october/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>jobless rate</category><category>JoblessRate</category><category>nonfarm payroll</category><category>nonfarm payrolls</category><category>NonfarmPayroll</category><category>NonfarmPayrolls</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Jobless claims drop during the last week of October]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/05/jobless-claims-drop-during-the-last-week-of-october/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/05/jobless-claims-drop-during-the-last-week-of-october/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/05/jobless-claims-drop-during-the-last-week-of-october/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/10/rsz_unemploy_ap.jpg" alt="" />Last week, the number of people filing <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story//jobless-claims-fall-20000-to-512000-2009-11-05">initial claims for state unemployment dropped by 20,000</a>. As a result, benefits dropped to a seasonally adjusted 512,000. This drop in filings was the first in the past two weeks, and it is the lowest level of initial claims seen since early January. </p>
<p>That said, initial jobless claims have come in atop 500,000 for the past 51 weeks. In addition, the four-week average of claims dropped 3,000 to 523,700. This total is the lowest since the beginning of the year. Expectations called for initial jobless claims to drop to 520,000 last week, so it may be time to sound the rally bell.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/05/jobless-claims-drop-during-the-last-week-of-october/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Jobless claims drop during the last week of October</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/05/jobless-claims-drop-during-the-last-week-of-october/">Jobless claims drop during the last week of October</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 05 Nov 2009 11:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/05/jobless-claims-drop-during-the-last-week-of-october/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19224508/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/05/jobless-claims-drop-during-the-last-week-of-october/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>employment</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jobless</category><category>jobless claims</category><category>nonfarm payroll</category><category>nonfarm payrolls</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 11:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Jobless report: Good and bad surprises as unemployment reaches 9.7%]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/04/jobless-report-good-and-bad-surprises-as-unemployment-reaches-9/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/04/jobless-report-good-and-bad-surprises-as-unemployment-reaches-9/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/04/jobless-report-good-and-bad-surprises-as-unemployment-reaches-9/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/before-the-bell/" rel="tag">Before the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><p><img hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/04/labor.jpg" />It would have been nice if the jobs report this morning was simple, containing only surprises to the upside. But of course, the jobs market continued to show weakness as the August nonfarm report showed. The <a href="http://money.aol.com/article/jobs/jobless-rate-jumps-to-97-percent/654607">unemployment rate rose</a> from 9.4% in July to 9.7% last month, the highest since June 1983. Meanwhile, employers cut a net total of 216,000 nonfarm jobs.</p>
<p>The unemployment rate was above economists' expectations of 9.5%, but the payroll decline below their projections for a cut of 225,000 jobs. For now, stock futures are still higher, indicating markets could at least start the session on a positive note.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/04/jobless-report-good-and-bad-surprises-as-unemployment-reaches-9/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Jobless report: Good and bad surprises as unemployment reaches 9.7%</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/04/jobless-report-good-and-bad-surprises-as-unemployment-reaches-9/">Jobless report: Good and bad surprises as unemployment reaches 9.7%</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 04 Sep 2009 09:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/04/jobless-report-good-and-bad-surprises-as-unemployment-reaches-9/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19151235/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/04/jobless-report-good-and-bad-surprises-as-unemployment-reaches-9/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><category>nonfarm payroll</category><category>NonfarmPayroll</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Melly Alazraki]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 09:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Employment reports shows fewer jobs than expected were lost in July]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/07/employment-reports-shows-fewer-jobs-than-expected-were-lost-in-j/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/07/employment-reports-shows-fewer-jobs-than-expected-were-lost-in-j/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/07/employment-reports-shows-fewer-jobs-than-expected-were-lost-in-j/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/04/labor.jpg" />247,000 US jobs were lost in July, <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/32327811">far less than the 320,000 that were expected</a>. The unemployment rate eased slightly to 9.4% from 9.5% in June. And there was more good news -- 43,000 fewer jobs were lost in May and June than previously reported.</p>
<p>The Labor Department reported that this was the first time since April 2008 that the jobless rate has fallen. Official numbers show that 6.7 million jobs were lost since the start of the recession.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/07/employment-reports-shows-fewer-jobs-than-expected-were-lost-in-j/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Employment reports shows fewer jobs than expected were lost in July</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/07/employment-reports-shows-fewer-jobs-than-expected-were-lost-in-j/">Employment reports shows fewer jobs than expected were lost in July</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 07 Aug 2009 09:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.cnbc.com/id/32327811>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/07/employment-reports-shows-fewer-jobs-than-expected-were-lost-in-j/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19122372/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/07/employment-reports-shows-fewer-jobs-than-expected-were-lost-in-j/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>employment</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jobs</category><category>nonfarm payroll</category><category>NonfarmPayroll</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 09:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bad jobs report could spark a rally ... or capitulation -- an absurd argument]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/06/bad-jobs-report-could-spark-a-rally-or-capitulation-an-ab/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/06/bad-jobs-report-could-spark-a-rally-or-capitulation-an-ab/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/06/bad-jobs-report-could-spark-a-rally-or-capitulation-an-ab/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/unemploymentpicture.jpg" />At 8:30 a.m. Eastern this morning (about two hours from now), the government will likely report another horrendous jobs report, with analysts expecting that 615,000 nonfarm jobs were lost in February and that unemployment reached a rate of 7.9%, according to Briefing.com.<br /><br />Somehow, some people are saying a <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/bbdp/could-another-dismal-jobs-report-help/371970">bad jobs report could spark a rally</a>. How so? Granted, lately the markets move oftentimes in utter disconnect of the news, and who knows, it's quite possible we'll see a rally following Thursday's selloff. But if anyone would be buying stocks because the jobs report shows the economy keeps getting worst, that would be quite amazing -- even for these crazy times.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/06/bad-jobs-report-could-spark-a-rally-or-capitulation-an-ab/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bad jobs report could spark a rally ... or capitulation -- an absurd argument</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/06/bad-jobs-report-could-spark-a-rally-or-capitulation-an-ab/">Bad jobs report could spark a rally ... or capitulation -- an absurd argument</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 06 Mar 2009 06:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/06/bad-jobs-report-could-spark-a-rally-or-capitulation-an-ab/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1480575/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/06/bad-jobs-report-could-spark-a-rally-or-capitulation-an-ab/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><category>nonfarm payroll</category><category>NonfarmPayroll</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Melly Alazraki]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 06:35:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Unemployment rate worse than expected -- leaps to 7.2%]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/09/unemployment-rate-worse-than-expected-leaps-to-7-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/09/unemployment-rate-worse-than-expected-leaps-to-7-2/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/09/unemployment-rate-worse-than-expected-leaps-to-7-2/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/unemploymentpicture.jpg" />Today's markets are likely to move based on the higher-than-expected unemployment rate. At 8:30 a.m., the Labor Department announced a <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aPs6ACpdnKmI&amp;refer=home">mixed employment picture</a>: lower-than-expected job loss, yet higher-than-expected unemployment rate. But the more important questions for the economy are how many jobs were lost in 2008 and how many more will perish in the next few years.</p>
<p>Despite being better than expected, the numbers of jobs lost in December are still awful at 524,000. Not to mention, that the unemployment rate rose from 6.7% to 7.2%. Economists had forecast <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28574446/">550,000</a> lost jobs in December and an unemployment rate of 7%. The actual 7.2% unemployment rate is the highest in 26 years. Also, the <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2009/01/09/news/economy/jobs_december/index.htm">2.6 million jobs lost in 2008</a> marks the worst level since 1945. If things keep going along those lines, the unemployment rate could top 10%.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/09/unemployment-rate-worse-than-expected-leaps-to-7-2/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Unemployment rate worse than expected -- leaps to 7.2%</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/09/unemployment-rate-worse-than-expected-leaps-to-7-2/">Unemployment rate worse than expected -- leaps to 7.2%</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 09 Jan 2009 09:05:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/09/unemployment-rate-worse-than-expected-leaps-to-7-2/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1424412/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/09/unemployment-rate-worse-than-expected-leaps-to-7-2/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>employment</category><category>inthenews</category><category>nonfarm payroll</category><category>NonfarmPayroll</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 09:05:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Very poor September jobs report as employers' belt-tightening continues]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/03/very-poor-september-jobs-report-as-employers-belt-tightening-co/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/03/very-poor-september-jobs-report-as-employers-belt-tightening-co/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/03/very-poor-september-jobs-report-as-employers-belt-tightening-co/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/05/unemploymentpicture.jpg" alt="" />The U.S. economy <a href="http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm">lost another 159,000 jobs in September</a>, as companies in the world's largest economy continued to cut expenses to protect profits in the face of the economic slowdown. It was the largest monthly job loss in five years.<br /> <br />However, U.S. Labor Department officials cautioned that the September job loss total was skewed artificially higher by Hurricanes Gustav and Ike, which resulted in more job losses in the Gulf States region. Further, the unemployment rate remained the same at 6.1% in September, the Labor Department said. <br /><br />However, an alternate gauge of unemployment, which includes discouraged workers, rose to 11% in September from 10.7% in August. The conventional U.S. Labor Department unemployment rate does not include discouraged workers because they are not technically 'seeking work.' Still, some economists argue the discouraged metric is a more-accurate gauge of unemployment, contending that these discouraged workers would accept jobs if the positions were available.<br /><br />Also, the number of adults working part-time because no full-time job was available increased by 337,000 to 6.1 million in September.<br /><br />Economists <a href="http:// http://www.bloomberg.com/markets/ecalendar/index.html ">surveyed by Bloomberg News</a> had expected the U.S. economy to shed 100,000 jobs in September. September was the U.S. economy's tenth straight monthly job loss. The U.S. economy lost a revised 73,000 jobs in August and 67,000 in July. Further, the U.S. economy has now lost 760,000 jobs this year and more than 800,000 since the job slump started in late 2007.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/03/very-poor-september-jobs-report-as-employers-belt-tightening-co/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Very poor September jobs report as employers' belt-tightening continues</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/03/very-poor-september-jobs-report-as-employers-belt-tightening-co/">Very poor September jobs report as employers' belt-tightening continues</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 03 Oct 2008 09:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/03/very-poor-september-jobs-report-as-employers-belt-tightening-co/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1332110/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/10/03/very-poor-september-jobs-report-as-employers-belt-tightening-co/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Hurricane Gustav</category><category>Hurricane Ike</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jobs</category><category>nonfarm payroll</category><category>NonfarmPayroll</category><category>U.S. economy</category><category>U.S. Labor Department</category><category>unemployment rate</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 09:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Market to tumble on bad economic stats]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/05/market-to-tumble-on-bad-economic-stats/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/05/market-to-tumble-on-bad-economic-stats/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/05/market-to-tumble-on-bad-economic-stats/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/indices/" rel="tag">Indices</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mandftoday/" rel="tag">Money and Finance Today</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/arrow_down_down_240.jpg" alt="" />The U.S. market is driving the world -- whose <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/06/business/worldbusiness/06asia.html?hp">stock indices plunged</a> after yesterday's 345 Dow rout. But what does today bring? A chance for recovery or further devastation depending on whether reported economic statistics are better or worse than economists expect. Early reports are bad.</p>
<p>Here are the reports to watch, and what analysts had been expecting according to <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2008/09/05/markets/stockswatch/index.htm"><em>CNNMoney</em></a>:</p>
<ul>
    <li><strong>Job cuts -</strong> Economists expected 75,000 lost jobs, but the 8:30am report was <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aklRMKFpGM_Y&amp;refer=home">84,000 lost jobs</a> -- worse than expected. </li>
    <li><strong>Unemployment rate -</strong> They had forecast the jobless rate to stay the same at 5.7%, but economists were wrong on this one too and unemployment rose to <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/06/business/economy/06econ.html?_r=1&amp;hp&amp;oref=slogin">6.1%</a>. </li>
    <li><strong>Hours worked </strong>- Economists anticipated the hour work week wouldn't change from July at 33.7, and they were right.</li>
    <li><strong>Change in hourly earnings -</strong> Economists saw a 0.3% increase in the hourly wage, the same as July, but hourly wages rose 0.4%. Some may interpret this as inflationary pressure, but the increase is likely not enough to increase consumer spending either.</li>
</ul>
In general, these statistics suggest consumers are less able to spend money. Since initial numbers suggest things are worse than had been anticipated, stocks could plunge, causing policymakers to meet this weekend to try to hatch another plan to boost investor confidence for announcement on Sunday night.
<p><em>Peter Cohan is President of</em> <a href="http://petercohan.com/"><em><font color="#0072bc">Peter S. Cohan &amp; Associates</font></em></a><em>. He also </em><a href="http://www3.babson.edu/Academics/Divisions/management/facultyprofile.cfm?pageid=391236"><em><font color="#0072bc">teaches management at Babson College</font></em></a><em> and edits </em><a href="http://petercohan.blogspot.com/2007/01/cohan-letter-up-15-in-2006.html"><em><font color="#0072bc">The Cohan Letter</font></em></a><a href="http://petercohan.blogspot.com/2007/01/cohan-letter-up-15-in-2006.html"><em><the cohan="" letter=""></the></em></a><em>. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/05/market-to-tumble-on-bad-economic-stats/">Market to tumble on bad economic stats</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 05 Sep 2008 09:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aklRMKFpGM_Y&amp;refer=home>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/05/market-to-tumble-on-bad-economic-stats/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1305390/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/09/05/market-to-tumble-on-bad-economic-stats/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economic data</category><category>EconomicData</category><category>inthenews</category><category>no-farm payroll</category><category>No-farmPayroll</category><category>nonfarm payroll</category><category>NonfarmPayroll</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 09:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[U.S. economy sheds 51k jobs in July, as unemployment hits 4-year high]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/01/u-s-economy-sheds-51k-jobs-in-july-as-unemployment-hits-4-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/01/u-s-economy-sheds-51k-jobs-in-july-as-unemployment-hits-4-year/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/01/u-s-economy-sheds-51k-jobs-in-july-as-unemployment-hits-4-year/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p>The U.S. economy lost another 51,000 jobs in June, <a href="http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm">the U.S. Labor Department announced Thursday</a>, a figure that suggests the world's largest economy continues to slow, but has not seen -- so far -- the massive job losses that have accompanied previous slowdowns/recessions. <br /> <br />Meanwhile, the unemployment rate rose to 5.7% in July -- the highest rate in four years.<br /><br />Economists <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/markets/ecalendar/index.html">surveyed by Bloomberg News</a> had expected the U.S. economy to shed 72,000 jobs and the unemployment to remain the same at 5.6% in July.<br /><br />Further, June was the U.S. economy's sixth straight monthly job loss and brings total job losses in 2008 to 463,000, the Labor Department said. <br /><br /><strong>Not good news, but not horrible, either</strong><br /><br />Economist Glen Langan took pains to underscore that the July jobs report was not good news, even as he, and perhaps other economists as well, were somewhat relieved that the July jobs report was not a debacle. <br /><br /> "It's by no means a strong report, as it continues to show a difficult job market, but it isn't a totally awful report either," Langan said.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/01/u-s-economy-sheds-51k-jobs-in-july-as-unemployment-hits-4-year/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>U.S. economy sheds 51k jobs in July, as unemployment hits 4-year high</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/01/u-s-economy-sheds-51k-jobs-in-july-as-unemployment-hits-4-year/">U.S. economy sheds 51k jobs in July, as unemployment hits 4-year high</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 01 Aug 2008 09:54:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/01/u-s-economy-sheds-51k-jobs-in-july-as-unemployment-hits-4-year/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1272740/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/01/u-s-economy-sheds-51k-jobs-in-july-as-unemployment-hits-4-year/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economic expansion</category><category>employment</category><category>gdp</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jobs</category><category>nonfarm payroll</category><category>NonfarmPayroll</category><category>recovery</category><category>U.S. economy</category><category>U.S. Labor Department</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 09:54:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Jobs unexpectedly drop -- is the economy already in a recession?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/01/jobs-unexpectedly-drop-is-the-economy-already-in-a-recession/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/01/jobs-unexpectedly-drop-is-the-economy-already-in-a-recession/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/01/jobs-unexpectedly-drop-is-the-economy-already-in-a-recession/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p>Not good. Not good at all! <br /><br />The U.S. has experienced a <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=a.B2A7g9fifU&amp;refer=home">surprise drop in jobs</a> in January for the first time since August 2003. Some economists have estimated that the U.S. had entered recession already in December of 2007. The recent <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/30/u-s-economy-grew-below-estimates-in-q4-fed-may-cut-rates-today/">GDP statistics of an abysmal 0.6% growth</a> in the last quarter of 2007, as well as the weak <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/12/with-70-of-gdp-on-crunched-consumer-is-it-time-to-sell/">2% rate in consumer spending</a> in the last quarter, certainly could back that up. Now, this 17,000 loss of jobs in January, which none of the 80 economists surveyed by Bloomberg had predicted (the median called for an addition of 70,000 jobs according to Briefing.com), further increases the odds the economy will fall into a recession. That is, if it hasn't already.<br /><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/01/jobs-unexpectedly-drop-is-the-economy-already-in-a-recession/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Jobs unexpectedly drop -- is the economy already in a recession?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/01/jobs-unexpectedly-drop-is-the-economy-already-in-a-recession/">Jobs unexpectedly drop -- is the economy already in a recession?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 01 Feb 2008 13:11:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=a.B2A7g9fifU&amp;refer=home>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/01/jobs-unexpectedly-drop-is-the-economy-already-in-a-recession/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1104076/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/01/jobs-unexpectedly-drop-is-the-economy-already-in-a-recession/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>federal reserve</category><category>FederalReserve</category><category>inthenews</category><category>nonfarm payroll</category><category>NonfarmPayroll</category><category>recession</category><category>unemployment rate</category><category>UnemploymentRate</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Melly Alazraki]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 13:11:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
