<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Will The New York Times End Tough Year with Earnings Bump?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/09/will-the-new-york-times-ended-tough-year-with-earnings-bump/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/09/will-the-new-york-times-ended-tough-year-with-earnings-bump/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/09/will-the-new-york-times-ended-tough-year-with-earnings-bump/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/01/nytimes.jpg" />New York Times Co. (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys">NYT</a>), which has said it plans to move to <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/new-york-times-sells-its-metered-model-2010-1?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+typepad%2Falleyinsider%2Fsilicon_alley_insider+%28Silicon+Alley+Insider%29">a metered model</a> for its online presence, is scheduled to discuss its fourth-quarter and full-year 2009 financial results in a conference call Wednesday, Feb. 10, at 11:00 AM (ET). An live webcast of the call will be available at the <a href="http://www.nytco.com/investors">company's website</a>.</p>
<p>During the three months that ended in December, New York Times released an <a href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/new-york-times-releases-application-for-blackberry-smartphones/rfid273940236?channel=pf">app for the BlackBerry</a> and new features for <a href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/the-new-york-times-launches-times-skimmer/rfid276528732?channel=pf">NYTimes.com</a>, as well as named <a href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/the-new-york-times-company-names-todd-c-mccarty-senior-vice-president-human-resources/rfid280242087?channel=pf">a new HR chief</a>. Analysts surveyed by Thomson Reuters are looking for earnings for that period of $0.38 per share. That's up from $0.16 per share in the previous quarter and $0.30 per share a year ago. But revenue for the fourth quarter is expected to be 15.4% lower than a year ago to $653.2 million.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/09/will-the-new-york-times-ended-tough-year-with-earnings-bump/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Will The New York Times End Tough Year with Earnings Bump?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/09/will-the-new-york-times-ended-tough-year-with-earnings-bump/">Will The New York Times End Tough Year with Earnings Bump?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 09 Feb 2010 16:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/09/will-the-new-york-times-ended-tough-year-with-earnings-bump/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19350766/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/09/will-the-new-york-times-ended-tough-year-with-earnings-bump/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>earnings</category><category>inthenews</category><category>New York Times</category><category>NYT</category><category>NYTimes.com</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trey Thoelcke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 16:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[It's Official: Your Online New York Times Will Come at a Price ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/20/its-official-your-online-new-york-times-will-come-at-a-price/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/20/its-official-your-online-new-york-times-will-come-at-a-price/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/20/its-official-your-online-new-york-times-will-come-at-a-price/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a></p><p><img  border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/robeputer240.jpg" />On Monday, Tom Johansmeyer indicated that a for-pay model for the online version of <em>The New York Times </em><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/18/new-york-times-online-business-model-could-be-only-days-away/" target="_blank">was imminent</a>. Indeed, a press release from The New York Times Company (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys">NYT</a>) hit the wires Wednesday morning, revealing that a paid version of NYTimes.com <a href="http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/permalink/?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;newsId=20100120005487&amp;newsLang=en" target="_blank">would launch</a> at the beginning of 2011 -- that's next year. So "All the News That's Fit to Print" will be available to Web browsers at a cost.</p>
<p>But the only folks that will have to open their wallets are those who leaf through lots of <em>Times </em>articles. The casual news browser will have free access to a specified number of articles each month before being charged. Subscribers who pay for home delivery of the traditional paper will have free and unlimited access to the site.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/20/its-official-your-online-new-york-times-will-come-at-a-price/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>It's Official: Your Online New York Times Will Come at a Price </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/20/its-official-your-online-new-york-times-will-come-at-a-price/">It's Official: Your Online New York Times Will Come at a Price </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 20 Jan 2010 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/20/its-official-your-online-new-york-times-will-come-at-a-price/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19324079/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/20/its-official-your-online-new-york-times-will-come-at-a-price/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>new york times</category><category>newspapers</category><category>NYT</category><category>NYTimes.com</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Beth Gaston Moon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[New York Times Online Business Model Could Be Only Days Away]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/18/new-york-times-online-business-model-could-be-only-days-away/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/18/new-york-times-online-business-model-could-be-only-days-away/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/18/new-york-times-online-business-model-could-be-only-days-away/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/new-york-times-logo-200.jpg" />The <em>New York Times</em> (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys" target="_blank">NYT</a>) has been struggling to figure out the web, which has led to a debate over whether to charge for electrons that has spanned years. Well, the Times seems likely to take the plunge, hoping to replicate the successes of the <a href="http://www.ft.com" target="_blank"><em>Financial Times</em></a> and <em><a href="http://www.wsj.com">Wall Street Journal</a></em> ... except, of course, that the <a><em>Wall Street Journal</em></a><em> </em>is famous for not really delivering profits. Fortunately, the new pay wall is expected to look more like the <em>Financial Times </em>than the <em>Wall Street Journal</em>. The <a href="http://www.nytimes.com" target="_blank"><em>New York Times</em></a> is considering a "metered" system. Visitors will be able to read a certain number of articles free before being required to subscribe.</p>
<p>A friend of Arthur Sulzberger, according to <a href="http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2010/01/new_york_times_set_to_mimic_ws.html" target="_blank"><em>New York Magazine</em>'s Daily Intel</a>, said that the final word could come in a few days, a sentiment corroborated by a newsroom source who said that the plan could be announced within weeks. Yet, plans need to be implemented, so it could take months for the Times to begin charging for content.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/18/new-york-times-online-business-model-could-be-only-days-away/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>New York Times Online Business Model Could Be Only Days Away</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/18/new-york-times-online-business-model-could-be-only-days-away/">New York Times Online Business Model Could Be Only Days Away</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 18 Jan 2010 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/18/new-york-times-online-business-model-could-be-only-days-away/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19320705/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/18/new-york-times-online-business-model-could-be-only-days-away/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aapl</category><category>Apple</category><category>apple tablet</category><category>arthur sulzberger</category><category>featured</category><category>financial times</category><category>ft</category><category>FT.com</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>inthenews</category><category>maureen dowd</category><category>media</category><category>new york city</category><category>new york times</category><category>News Corp.</category><category>newspaper advertising</category><category>newspaper industry</category><category>newspapers</category><category>NWS</category><category>nyt</category><category>nytimes.com</category><category>online ads</category><category>online advertising</category><category>tablet</category><category>Tom Friedman</category><category>wall street journal</category><category>wsj</category><category>WSJ.com</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Vibe makes a comeback, realizes internet is important]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/vibe-makes-a-comeback-realizes-internet-is-important/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/vibe-makes-a-comeback-realizes-internet-is-important/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/vibe-makes-a-comeback-realizes-internet-is-important/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pep/" rel="tag">PepsiCo (PEP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/privateequity/" rel="tag">Private Equity</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nsany/" rel="tag">Nissan Motors (NSANY)</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/04/magazine_stand_pinkmoose.jpg" /><em>Vibe</em>, the urban music magazine, is <a href="http://adage.com/mediaworks/article?article_id=140139" target="_blank">clawing its way back to life</a>. New owners and editors are trying to make the magazine a <strike>success</strike> reality again, and they are making the web a priority ... which shouldn't be news but is for an ailing print industry. </p>
<p>The new editor-in-chief, Jermaine Hall, told <em>AdAge</em> that "Vibe.com is really the hub," and that everything needs to point back to the online presence. The print publication will be just one part of the Vibe Lifestyle Network, a move we're also seeing with the likes of <em>Rolling Stone</em>, where the website is being brought back into the fold (and may actually get some resources).</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/vibe-makes-a-comeback-realizes-internet-is-important/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Vibe makes a comeback, realizes internet is important</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/vibe-makes-a-comeback-realizes-internet-is-important/">Vibe makes a comeback, realizes internet is important</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://adage.com/mediaworks/article?article_id=140139>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/vibe-makes-a-comeback-realizes-internet-is-important/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19221812/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/vibe-makes-a-comeback-realizes-internet-is-important/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>conde nast</category><category>Fred Mwangaguhunga</category><category>general motors</category><category>grm</category><category>intermedia</category><category>Jermaine Hall</category><category>Leonard Burnett Jr.</category><category>magazines</category><category>MediaTakeOut</category><category>music magazines</category><category>new york times</category><category>ny times</category><category>nyt</category><category>nytimes</category><category>nytimes.com</category><category>pep</category><category>pepsi</category><category>pepsico</category><category>print magazines</category><category>print media</category><category>rolling stone</category><category>sean john</category><category>time</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>twx</category><category>vibe</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[NY Times: When nobody buys newspapers, charge more]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/28/ny-times-when-nobody-buys-newspapers-charge-more/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/28/ny-times-when-nobody-buys-newspapers-charge-more/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/28/ny-times-when-nobody-buys-newspapers-charge-more/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><img border="0" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/07/nyt-new-york-times-logo.jpg" />The <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys" target="_blank">NY Times Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys" target="_blank">NYT</a>) has decided to <a href="http://bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&amp;sid=aLVQaTs1HON0&amp;refer=home" target="_blank">double down on a failing strategy</a>: Charge more for print. As circulation declines, the ailing newspaper company has decided to extract as much revenue as possible from its tangible product, despite the fact that the market is shrinking. </p>
<p>Starting Monday, the company's flagship newspaper will cost $2  an increase of a third from the previous newsstand price of $1.50. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/28/ny-times-when-nobody-buys-newspapers-charge-more/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>NY Times: When nobody buys newspapers, charge more</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/28/ny-times-when-nobody-buys-newspapers-charge-more/">NY Times: When nobody buys newspapers, charge more</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 28 May 2009 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&amp;sid=aLVQaTs1HON0&amp;refer=home>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/28/ny-times-when-nobody-buys-newspapers-charge-more/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19050138/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/28/ny-times-when-nobody-buys-newspapers-charge-more/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>circulation drop</category><category>inthenews</category><category>new york times</category><category>new york times company</category><category>newspaper</category><category>newspaper advertising</category><category>newspaper industry</category><category>newspapers</category><category>ny times</category><category>nyt</category><category>nytimes.com</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
