<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Facebook Grows as a Source for News]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/07/facebook-grows-as-a-source-for-news/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/07/facebook-grows-as-a-source-for-news/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/07/facebook-grows-as-a-source-for-news/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/facebook-logo-240.jpg" alt="" />How are readers finding the news? Well, increasingly, <a target="_blank" href="http://digital.venturebeat.com/2010/02/03/is-facebook-becoming-a-portal/?utm_source=twitter&amp;utm_medium=twitter-publisher-main&amp;utm_campaign=twitter">the answer is Facebook</a>. The social networking site, which boasts well over 350 million registered users, is now the fourth largest referral source of traffic to online news destinations. Almost a year ago, only 0.5% of traffic to news and media sites came from <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Facebook/">Facebook</a>. Today, that level is 3.5%, according to <a target="_blank" href="http://weblogs.hitwise.com/us-heather-hopkins/2010/02/facebook_largest_news_reader_1.html">data from Web analytics firm Experian Hitwise</a>.</p>
<p>Only Google (<a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>), Yahoo! (<a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) and MSN (<a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) send more traffic to news sites. <a target="_blank" href="http://news.google.com">Google News</a>, a subset of the search engine giant, failed to keep pace with Facebook, despite the fact that it exists specifically to send Internet users to media outlets. Only 1.39% of referrals came from this source.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/07/facebook-grows-as-a-source-for-news/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Facebook Grows as a Source for News</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/07/facebook-grows-as-a-source-for-news/">Facebook Grows as a Source for News</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 07 Feb 2010 10:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/07/facebook-grows-as-a-source-for-news/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19347948/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/07/facebook-grows-as-a-source-for-news/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>experian</category><category>facebook</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>hitwise</category><category>inthenews</category><category>media</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>msn</category><category>new york times</category><category>new york times company</category><category>news</category><category>news corp</category><category>newspapers</category><category>nyt</category><category>nytimes</category><category>social media</category><category>social networking</category><category>wall street journal</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 10:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Newsday Shows Future of Online Subscription Model]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/27/newsday-shows-future-of-online-subscription-model/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/27/newsday-shows-future-of-online-subscription-model/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/27/newsday-shows-future-of-online-subscription-model/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/newsdaycom-logo.jpg" alt="" />The recent announcement by the <em>New York Times</em> (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys" target="_blank">NYT</a>) that it would start to require subscriptions next year has drawn no shortage of attention and commentary. It has tried to put content behind a pay wall before (and failed), as have other newspapers.</p>
<p>Almost universally, newspapers have struggled with online subscriptions, with the <em>Financial Times</em> and <em>Wall Street Journal</em>, a News Corp (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas" target="_blank">NWS</a>) property, the only two that have really delivered results better than awful. Whether the <em>New York Times</em> can operate at that level is in doubt, particularly given the stunning realization about Long Island daily newspaper <em>Newsday</em>.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/27/newsday-shows-future-of-online-subscription-model/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Newsday Shows Future of Online Subscription Model</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/27/newsday-shows-future-of-online-subscription-model/">Newsday Shows Future of Online Subscription Model</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 27 Jan 2010 11:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.observer.com/2010/media/after-three-months-only-35-subscriptions-newsdays-web-site>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/27/newsday-shows-future-of-online-subscription-model/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19333529/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/27/newsday-shows-future-of-online-subscription-model/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>financial times</category><category>inthenews</category><category>long island</category><category>media</category><category>new york times co.</category><category>news corp</category><category>news corporation</category><category>newsday</category><category>newspaper industry</category><category>newspapers</category><category>NewYorkTimes</category><category>NWS</category><category>nyt</category><category>nytimes</category><category>Optimum</category><category>wall street journal</category><category>wsj</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 11:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Twitter Starting to Pop Up in Ad Deals]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/06/twitter-starting-to-pop-up-in-ad-deals/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/06/twitter-starting-to-pop-up-in-ad-deals/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/06/twitter-starting-to-pop-up-in-ad-deals/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><em><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/twitter-logo-200x150.jpg" />The New York Times</em> (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys">NYT</a>) is putting its <a target="_blank" href="http://twitter.com/nytimes">2.3 million followers to work</a>. It isn't ready to start charging a la carte for <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Twitter/">Twitter</a> advertising, <a target="_blank" href="http://adage.com/mediaworks/article?article_id=141294">but it is including the channel in the comprehensive packages it presents to advertisers</a>. And, the <em>Times </em>isn't alone. Several media outlets (including <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a>) have ads running through their Twitter streams, but this is still virgin territory, for the most part, and media companies are still feeling their ways through it.<br /><br /><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/06/twitter-starting-to-pop-up-in-ad-deals/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Twitter Starting to Pop Up in Ad Deals</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/06/twitter-starting-to-pop-up-in-ad-deals/">Twitter Starting to Pop Up in Ad Deals</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 06 Jan 2010 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://adage.com/mediaworks/article?article_id=141294>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/06/twitter-starting-to-pop-up-in-ad-deals/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19305138/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/06/twitter-starting-to-pop-up-in-ad-deals/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>facebook</category><category>inthenews</category><category>media</category><category>new york times</category><category>new york times co.</category><category>NewYorkTimes</category><category>NewYorkTimesCo.</category><category>ny times</category><category>nyt</category><category>nytimes</category><category>social media</category><category>SocialMedia</category><category>twitter</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[NYT News Service migrates after cut]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/nyt-news-service-migrates-after-cuts/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/nyt-news-service-migrates-after-cuts/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/nyt-news-service-migrates-after-cuts/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/07/nyt-new-york-times-logo.jpg" alt="" />This winter, a bit more of <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/NewYork/">New York</a> is headed to <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Florida/">Florida</a>. <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Layoffs/">Layoffs</a> for 2010 have already been announced for the New York Times Company(<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/13/business/media/13times.html?_r=1&amp;ref=media" target="_blank">NYT</a>). The New York Times News Service will lose 25 editorial positions next year and shift the service's editing to one of the parent company's Florida <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/newspapers/">newspapers</a>. At present, the news service has 30 editorial jobs. Some of the layoffs will occur in February, and the others will happen in May.</p>
<p>These layoffs are not included in the planned slashing of 100 jobs in the flagship newspaper's newsroom -- a workforce reduction of 8% that should take hold by the end of the year. The NY Times is also ceasing pension contributions for nonunion employees.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/nyt-news-service-migrates-after-cuts/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>NYT News Service migrates after cut</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/nyt-news-service-migrates-after-cuts/">NYT News Service migrates after cut</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/nyt-news-service-migrates-after-cuts/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19236718/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/nyt-news-service-migrates-after-cuts/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>gainesville</category><category>inthenews</category><category>layoffs</category><category>new york times</category><category>new york times co.</category><category>new york times company</category><category>newspaper industry</category><category>newspaper stocks</category><category>NewspaperIndustry</category><category>newspapers</category><category>NewspaperStocks</category><category>NewYorkTimes</category><category>NewYorkTimesCo.</category><category>NewYorkTimesCompany</category><category>nyt</category><category>nytimes</category><category>unions</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Vibe makes a comeback, realizes internet is important]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/vibe-makes-a-comeback-realizes-internet-is-important/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/vibe-makes-a-comeback-realizes-internet-is-important/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/vibe-makes-a-comeback-realizes-internet-is-important/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pep/" rel="tag">PepsiCo (PEP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/privateequity/" rel="tag">Private Equity</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nsany/" rel="tag">Nissan Motors (NSANY)</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/04/magazine_stand_pinkmoose.jpg" /><em>Vibe</em>, the urban music magazine, is <a href="http://adage.com/mediaworks/article?article_id=140139" target="_blank">clawing its way back to life</a>. New owners and editors are trying to make the magazine a <strike>success</strike> reality again, and they are making the web a priority ... which shouldn't be news but is for an ailing print industry. </p>
<p>The new editor-in-chief, Jermaine Hall, told <em>AdAge</em> that "Vibe.com is really the hub," and that everything needs to point back to the online presence. The print publication will be just one part of the Vibe Lifestyle Network, a move we're also seeing with the likes of <em>Rolling Stone</em>, where the website is being brought back into the fold (and may actually get some resources).</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/vibe-makes-a-comeback-realizes-internet-is-important/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Vibe makes a comeback, realizes internet is important</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/vibe-makes-a-comeback-realizes-internet-is-important/">Vibe makes a comeback, realizes internet is important</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://adage.com/mediaworks/article?article_id=140139>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/vibe-makes-a-comeback-realizes-internet-is-important/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19221812/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/04/vibe-makes-a-comeback-realizes-internet-is-important/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>conde nast</category><category>Fred Mwangaguhunga</category><category>general motors</category><category>grm</category><category>intermedia</category><category>Jermaine Hall</category><category>Leonard Burnett Jr.</category><category>magazines</category><category>MediaTakeOut</category><category>music magazines</category><category>new york times</category><category>ny times</category><category>nyt</category><category>nytimes</category><category>nytimes.com</category><category>pep</category><category>pepsi</category><category>pepsico</category><category>print magazines</category><category>print media</category><category>rolling stone</category><category>sean john</category><category>time</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>twx</category><category>vibe</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Time and WSJ to lay off more]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/time-and-wsj-to-lay-off-more/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/time-and-wsj-to-lay-off-more/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/time-and-wsj-to-lay-off-more/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/wall_street_journal_240.jpg" alt="" />The mayhem in the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/media/">media</a> industry continues. The <a href="http://www.wsj.com" target="_blank">Wall Street Journal</a>, a <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas" target="_blank">News Corp</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nas" target="_blank">NWS</a>) property, is <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/fishbowlny/the_revolving_door/more_business_journalism_layoffs_wall_street_journal_closes_boston_office_141650.asp" target="_blank">closing its Boston bureau and sending nine employees into the wind</a>. The newswire and <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com" target="_blank">MarketWatch</a> operations are going to stay open in <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Boston/">Boston</a>, however, with no headcount impact. </p>
<p>The Journal doesn't have any plans to close other offices, according to a memo by managing editor Robert Thomson: "there are no plans, nascent or otherwise, to close any other U.S. or international bureau." The <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/WSJ/">WSJ</a> will still support an "investigative function" in Boston, but the New York-based Money and Investing team will cover Boston's <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/mutualfund/">mutual fund</a> industry, which boasts such heavy hitters as <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Fidelity/">Fidelity</a>. </p>
<p>At the same time, magazine company <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/TimeInc/">Time Inc</a>., owned by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys" target="_blank">Time Warner</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys" target="_blank">TWX</a>) is looking to cut $100 million in expenses, and <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/layoffs/">layoffs</a> will undoubtedly figure into the equation. The company that owns <a href="http://www.time.com" target="_blank">Time</a>, <a href="http://www.fortune.com" target="_blank">Fortune</a>, <a href="http://www.people.com" target="_blank">People</a> and <a href="http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/" target="_blank">Sports Illustrated</a> - and falls under the same umbrella as <a href="http://www.aol.com" target="_blank">AOL</a>, which owns <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com" target="_blank">BloggingStocks</a> - is feeling the squeeze of a media recession that's even worse than the regular recession we've all been battling for what feels like decades. </p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/time-and-wsj-to-lay-off-more/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Time and WSJ to lay off more</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/time-and-wsj-to-lay-off-more/">Time and WSJ to lay off more</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/time-and-wsj-to-lay-off-more/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19216496/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/time-and-wsj-to-lay-off-more/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aol</category><category>boston</category><category>boston globe</category><category>boston.com</category><category>BostonGlobe</category><category>conde nast</category><category>CondeNast</category><category>cost cutting</category><category>CostCutting</category><category>fortune</category><category>graydon carter</category><category>GraydonCarter</category><category>inthenews</category><category>layoff</category><category>layoffs</category><category>magazine</category><category>magazines</category><category>marketwatch</category><category>mckinsey</category><category>mckinseyco.</category><category>MutualFunds</category><category>new york</category><category>new york times</category><category>new york times co.</category><category>news corp</category><category>news corpb nws</category><category>news corporation</category><category>NewsCorp</category><category>NewsCorporation</category><category>NewYorkTimes</category><category>nyt</category><category>nytimes</category><category>PeopleMagazine</category><category>SportsIllustrated</category><category>time</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeInc</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>twx</category><category>VanityFair</category><category>wsj</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[New York Times to cut 100 newsroom positions]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/new-york-times-to-cut-100-newsroom-positions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/new-york-times-to-cut-100-newsroom-positions/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/new-york-times-to-cut-100-newsroom-positions/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gci/" rel="tag">Gannett Co (GCI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/07/nyt-new-york-times-logo.jpg" />The folks in the news business are probably growing to hate Mondays. <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/gannett-inc-del/gci/nys">Gannett</a>'s (NYSE: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/gannett-inc-del/gci/nys">GCI</a>) profits are off by more than 50%, and the <em><a target="_blank" href="http://www.nytimes.com">New York Times</a></em> announced that it's chopping 100 jobs from the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/newsroom/">newsroom</a>, along with an unspecified number elsewhere in the newspaper. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/19/gannett-profit-falls-by-more-than-half/">Like Gannett</a>, the <em>New York Times</em> cites declines in ad revenue as the reason for the decision. The company is hoping that employees will take voluntary buyouts where offered, but <a target="_blank" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33384551/ns/business-media_biz/">it is prepared to conduct a round of layoffs if necessary</a>.</p>
<p>The newspaper, which is the flagship property of the <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys">New York Times Company</a> (NYSE: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys">NYT</a>), cut 100 newsroom positions last year, mostly through voluntary buyouts, before a "relatively small" round of layoffs. This year's 100-job cut is approximately 8% of the newsroom, but the paper will still have the largest in the United States. Approximately 1,150 reporters and editors will remain. Already, 100 jobs have been slashed on the business side, leaving it now staffed at 1,850.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/new-york-times-to-cut-100-newsroom-positions/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>New York Times to cut 100 newsroom positions</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/new-york-times-to-cut-100-newsroom-positions/">New York Times to cut 100 newsroom positions</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 20 Oct 2009 10:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33384551/ns/business-media_biz/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/new-york-times-to-cut-100-newsroom-positions/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19201837/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/new-york-times-to-cut-100-newsroom-positions/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>gannett</category><category>gannett co gci</category><category>gannettco.</category><category>GannettCoGci</category><category>gci</category><category>inthenews</category><category>new york times</category><category>new york times co.</category><category>newspaper</category><category>newspaper advertising</category><category>newspaper industry</category><category>NewspaperAdvertising</category><category>NewspaperIndustry</category><category>newspapers</category><category>newsroom</category><category>NewYorkTimes</category><category>NewYorkTimesCo.</category><category>nyt</category><category>nytimes</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 10:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Gannett profit falls by more than half]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/gannett-profit-falls-by-more-than-half/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/gannett-profit-falls-by-more-than-half/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/gannett-profit-falls-by-more-than-half/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gci/" rel="tag">Gannett Co (GCI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/gannett-co-gci-logo.jpg" /><a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/gannett-inc-del/gci/nys">Gannett</a> (NYSE: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/gannett-inc-del/gci/nys">GCI</a>) lost more than half its third-quarter profits year-over-year, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/companies/earnings/2009-10-19-gannett_N.htm">as the newspaper industry shows yet another sign of decline</a>. A substantial drop in ad revenue was the primary reason for the plunge.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/newspaper/">newspaper</a> giant was able to stay in the black because of aggressive cost cutting, a move that can work for only so long. For now, it's the most popular option available to the beleaguered industry, as evidenced by a <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys">New York Times</a> (NYSE: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys">NYT</a>) announcement that it would <a target="_blank" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33384551/ns/business-media_biz/">slash another 100 positions from the newsroom</a>, and more positions elsewhere.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/gannett-profit-falls-by-more-than-half/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Gannett profit falls by more than half</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/gannett-profit-falls-by-more-than-half/">Gannett profit falls by more than half</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 20 Oct 2009 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.usatoday.com/money/companies/earnings/2009-10-19-gannett_N.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/gannett-profit-falls-by-more-than-half/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19201830/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/20/gannett-profit-falls-by-more-than-half/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>gannett</category><category>gannett co gci</category><category>gannett co layoffs</category><category>gannett co.</category><category>GannettCo.</category><category>GannettCoGci</category><category>GannettCoLayoffs</category><category>gci</category><category>inthenews</category><category>new york times</category><category>new york times co.</category><category>newspaper</category><category>newspaper advertising</category><category>newspaper industry</category><category>NewspaperAdvertising</category><category>NewspaperIndustry</category><category>newspapers</category><category>newsprint</category><category>NewYorkTimes</category><category>NewYorkTimesCo.</category><category>nyt</category><category>nytimes</category><category>usa today</category><category>UsaToday</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[NYT pulls Boston Globe off the block]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/15/nyt-pulls-boston-globe-off-the-block/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/15/nyt-pulls-boston-globe-off-the-block/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/15/nyt-pulls-boston-globe-off-the-block/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/10/boston_globe.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />After months of speculation and years of underperformance, the<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys" target="_blank"> New York Times Company</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys" target="_blank">NYT</a>) has <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/innovationNews/idUSTRE59D5MI20091014" target="_blank">decided not to sell the Boston Globe and related businesses</a>. The company claims that the changes made at the Globe to slash expenses and right the ship financially have made it worth holding on to the newspaper. This comes after<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/11/boston-globe-s-future-remains-uncertain/" target="_blank"> two parties submitted their final bids</a> (similar financially) for the beleaguered 137-year-old property. </p>
<p>The NY Times Co. picked up the Globe in 1993 for $1.1 billion. Since then, it's watched the paper's revenue and circulation plummet, a situation worsened by the advent of the internet and the<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/newspaperindustry/"> newspaper industry</a>'s generally slow response to it. Now, it's apparently worth just under 10% of NYT's original purchase price, with the offers pushed higher by both parties' willingness to assume $59 million in pension liabilities. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/15/nyt-pulls-boston-globe-off-the-block/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>NYT pulls Boston Globe off the block</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/15/nyt-pulls-boston-globe-off-the-block/">NYT pulls Boston Globe off the block</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 15 Oct 2009 08:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/innovationNews/idUSTRE59D5MI20091014>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/15/nyt-pulls-boston-globe-off-the-block/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19196514/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/15/nyt-pulls-boston-globe-off-the-block/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>arthur sulzberger</category><category>ArthurSulzberger</category><category>boston</category><category>boston globe</category><category>boston massachusetts</category><category>boston.com</category><category>BostonGlobe</category><category>BostonMassachusetts</category><category>featured</category><category>goldman sachs</category><category>goldman sachs group</category><category>goldman sachs group gs</category><category>GoldmanSachs</category><category>GoldmanSachsGroup</category><category>GoldmanSachsGroupGs</category><category>gs</category><category>massachusetts</category><category>new york times co.</category><category>new york times company</category><category>newspaper</category><category>newspaper industry</category><category>NewspaperIndustry</category><category>newspapers</category><category>NewYorkTimesCo.</category><category>NewYorkTimesCompany</category><category>nyt</category><category>nytimes</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 08:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Boston Globe's future remains uncertain]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/11/boston-globe-s-future-remains-uncertain/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/11/boston-globe-s-future-remains-uncertain/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/11/boston-globe-s-future-remains-uncertain/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/privateequity/" rel="tag">Private Equity</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/04/bostonglobelogo.gif" alt="" />The next step remains uncertain for what will go down in history as among the worst newspaper acquisitions. </p>
<p>On Friday, the deadline for submitting bids for the <em><a href="http://www.boston.com" target="_blank">Boston Globe</a></em>, which is owned by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys" target="_blank">The New York Times Company</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys" target="_blank">NYT</a>), passed. <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/10/business/media/10globe.html?_r=1&amp;ref=business">Two major contenders</a> were expected to write figures on slips of paper and slide them across the proverbial desk: Platinum Equity, a Beverly Hills-based private equity firm and owner of the <em>San Diego Union-Tribune</em>, and Stephen E. Taylor, whose family sold the Globe in 1993.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/11/boston-globe-s-future-remains-uncertain/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Boston Globe's future remains uncertain</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/11/boston-globe-s-future-remains-uncertain/">Boston Globe's future remains uncertain</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 11 Oct 2009 15:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/11/boston-globe-s-future-remains-uncertain/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19191707/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/11/boston-globe-s-future-remains-uncertain/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>beverly hills</category><category>boston</category><category>boston globe</category><category>goldman sachs group</category><category>gs</category><category>inthenews</category><category>newspaper industry</category><category>newspapers</category><category>ny times</category><category>nyt</category><category>nytimes</category><category>platinum equity</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 15:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Boston Globe may be off the block]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/10/boston-globe-may-be-off-the-block/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/10/boston-globe-may-be-off-the-block/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/10/boston-globe-may-be-off-the-block/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/04/bostonglobelogo.gif" />The battered <a href="http://www.boston.com" target="_blank"><em>Boston Globe</em></a> isn't worth 90% of what the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys" target="_blank">NY Times Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys" target="_blank">NYT</a>) paid for it, but it seems to have bounced a bit from the bottom of the barrel. In a meeting with a few hundred of the newspaper's employees, company chairman Arthur Sulzberger Jr. and CEO Janet Robinson revealed that the <em>Globe</em>'s finances have improved significantly. Because of this development, they continued, there is a chance the newspaper will not be sold. </p>
<p>This was the first meeting between company executives and the <em>Globe</em>'s unions since the latter accepted pay cuts back in July. The newspaper, which has a 137-year history, lost $50 million in 2008 and looked like it was going to drop another $85 million this year. Though this no longer appears likely, the Globe is still in rough shape.</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/10/boston-globe-may-be-off-the-block/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Boston Globe may be off the block</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/10/boston-globe-may-be-off-the-block/">Boston Globe may be off the block</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 10 Sep 2009 11:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/10/boston-globe-may-be-off-the-block/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19156728/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/10/boston-globe-may-be-off-the-block/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>arthur sulzberger</category><category>boston</category><category>boston globe</category><category>inthenews</category><category>new york city</category><category>new york times</category><category>newspaper industry</category><category>newspapers</category><category>ny times</category><category>NyTimes</category><category>sulzberger</category><category>sulzbergerfamily</category><category>sulzbergers</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 11:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Drop in newspaper circulation continues: But not fast enough!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/27/drop-in-newspaper-circ-continues-not-fast-enough/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/27/drop-in-newspaper-circ-continues-not-fast-enough/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/27/drop-in-newspaper-circ-continues-not-fast-enough/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gci/" rel="tag">Gannett Co (GCI)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/10/makeover-25-200cm101608.jpg" alt="" />A ways back my father did some very interesting economic research into what happened to the price of drugs when a generic entered a market previously owned only by branded drugs. His findings? The entry of generics actually caused prices of brand prescriptions to rise as people who insisted on the branded prescription were willing to pay a higher price. <br /><br />I was reminded of that research in reading today about the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/28/business/media/28paper.html?ref=business">continuing decline in circulation of the big papers.</a> The only one that managed a circulation gain was the Wall Street Journal. The hand wringing continues over this horrible state -- but this is a sign to the papers to make lemonade rather than lemons.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/27/drop-in-newspaper-circ-continues-not-fast-enough/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Drop in newspaper circulation continues: But not fast enough!</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/27/drop-in-newspaper-circ-continues-not-fast-enough/">Drop in newspaper circulation continues: But not fast enough!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 27 Apr 2009 16:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/27/drop-in-newspaper-circ-continues-not-fast-enough/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1529563/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/27/drop-in-newspaper-circ-continues-not-fast-enough/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>gannett</category><category>gci</category><category>newspaper</category><category>newspaper industry</category><category>NewspaperIndustry</category><category>newspapers</category><category>nyt</category><category>nytimes</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex Salkever]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 16:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Doomsday Scenario: Craig's List is another nail in the news coffin]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/07/doomsday-scenario-craigs-list-nail-in-the-news-coffin/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/07/doomsday-scenario-craigs-list-nail-in-the-news-coffin/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/07/doomsday-scenario-craigs-list-nail-in-the-news-coffin/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/interviews/" rel="tag">Interviews</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mandftoday/" rel="tag">Money and Finance Today</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p>Ah, yes. Tuesday, baseball season, and new NCAA champs. Sigh. Online classified ad growth <a href="http://www.marketingcharts.com/interactive/online-classifieds-soar-84-in-february-craigslist-dominates-8620/?utm_campaign=rssfeed&amp;utm_source=mc&amp;utm_medium=textlink">skyrocketed by 84% in February, according to Hitwise</a> (tip to <a href="http://www.marketingcharts.com">MarketingCharts.com</a>). The bad news? Craig's List and other free classified sites dominated the growth, further sealing the doom of newspapers. Steve Ruble of Micropersuasion <a href="http://www.micropersuasion.com/2009/04/the-future-of-advertising.html">interviewed Jeff Jarvis of "What Would Google Do?" fame (and Buzzsaw, of course)</a> and asked what the future of online advertising was. The reply? Bleak to non-existent.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/07/doomsday-scenario-craigs-list-nail-in-the-news-coffin/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Doomsday Scenario: Craig's List is another nail in the news coffin</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/07/doomsday-scenario-craigs-list-nail-in-the-news-coffin/">Doomsday Scenario: Craig's List is another nail in the news coffin</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 07 Apr 2009 17:06:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/07/doomsday-scenario-craigs-list-nail-in-the-news-coffin/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1510914/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/04/07/doomsday-scenario-craigs-list-nail-in-the-news-coffin/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>consumer spending</category><category>ConsumerSpending</category><category>consumption</category><category>credit crunch</category><category>credit markets</category><category>CreditCrunch</category><category>CreditMarkets</category><category>depression</category><category>great depression</category><category>GreatDepression</category><category>newspapers</category><category>nyt</category><category>nytimes</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex Salkever]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 17:06:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[DailyFinance today: NY Times WaPo layoffs no surprise, Greenspan won't accept blame for meltdown, South Park on the economic meltdown, and BofA plans big pay hike for bankers]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/27/dailyfinance-today-ny-times-wapo-layoffs-no-surprise-greenspan/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/27/dailyfinance-today-ny-times-wapo-layoffs-no-surprise-greenspan/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/27/dailyfinance-today-ny-times-wapo-layoffs-no-surprise-greenspan/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a></p><table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5" style="border-width: 0pt;">
    <tbody>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top" align="left"><a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/03/27/bank-of-america-plans-big-pay-hike-for-investment-bankers/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/03/bankofamerica_thumbnail.jpg" /></a></td>
            <td><a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/03/27/bank-of-america-plans-big-pay-hike-for-investment-bankers/">Bank of America plans big pay hike for investment bankers</a> </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top" align="left"><a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/03/27/south-park-offers-a-compelling-explanation-for-the-economic-melt/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/03/win_200x150_thumbnail.jpg" /></a></td>
            <td><a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/03/27/south-park-offers-a-compelling-explanation-for-the-economic-melt/" rel="bookmark">South Park explains the economic meltdown</a> </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top" align="left"><a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/03/27/greenspan-still-wont-accept-blame-for-the-global-financial-melt/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/03/greenspan200_thumbnail.jpg" /></a></td>
            <td> <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/03/27/greenspan-still-wont-accept-blame-for-the-global-financial-melt/" rel="bookmark">Greenspan still won't accept blame for the global financial meltdown</a> </td>
        </tr>
        <tr>
            <td valign="top" align="right">
            <div align="right"><a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/03/27/media-biz-layoffs-at-ny-times-washington-post-are-not-a-surpri/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/03/investshadow200_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
            </td>
            <td> <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2009/03/27/media-biz-layoffs-at-ny-times-washington-post-are-not-a-surpri/">Media Biz: Layoffs at NY Times, Washington Post are not a surprise</a> </td>
        </tr>
    </tbody>
</table><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/27/dailyfinance-today-ny-times-wapo-layoffs-no-surprise-greenspan/">DailyFinance today: NY Times WaPo layoffs no surprise, Greenspan won't accept blame for meltdown, South Park on the economic meltdown, and BofA plans big pay hike for bankers</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 27 Mar 2009 18:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/27/dailyfinance-today-ny-times-wapo-layoffs-no-surprise-greenspan/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1500794/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/27/dailyfinance-today-ny-times-wapo-layoffs-no-surprise-greenspan/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>alan greenspan</category><category>AlanGreenspan</category><category>bank of america</category><category>BankOfAmerica</category><category>ny times</category><category>NyTimes</category><category>south park</category><category>SouthPark</category><category>washington post</category><category>WashingtonPost</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tobias Buckell]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 18:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Doomsday Scenario: Steve Jobs retiring, NYT pay cuts, looming water fights]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/27/doomsday-scenario-steve-jobs-retiring-nyt-pay-cuts-looming-wa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/27/doomsday-scenario-steve-jobs-retiring-nyt-pay-cuts-looming-wa/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/27/doomsday-scenario-steve-jobs-retiring-nyt-pay-cuts-looming-wa/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-sell/" rel="tag">Stocks to Sell</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/03/adam-baker.jpg" />The daily biscuits. With the June deadline for Steve Job's reappearance as <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">Apple</a> (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">NASDAQ: AAPL</a>) CEO coming on fast, <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/will-steve-jobs-retire-in-june-2009-3">speculation in the media</a> has begun to build that Jobs will choose to retire. That would be a horrifically bad thing for Apple shareholders, who have done very well of late. <a href="http://www.piqqem.com/equities/AAPL">Sentiment on Apple</a> is holding strong, so at least some people don't think Steve is bowing out.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/27/doomsday-scenario-steve-jobs-retiring-nyt-pay-cuts-looming-wa/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Doomsday Scenario: Steve Jobs retiring, NYT pay cuts, looming water fights</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/27/doomsday-scenario-steve-jobs-retiring-nyt-pay-cuts-looming-wa/">Doomsday Scenario: Steve Jobs retiring, NYT pay cuts, looming water fights</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 27 Mar 2009 07:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/27/doomsday-scenario-steve-jobs-retiring-nyt-pay-cuts-looming-wa/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1499719/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/03/27/doomsday-scenario-steve-jobs-retiring-nyt-pay-cuts-looming-wa/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aapl</category><category>inthenews</category><category>newspapers</category><category>nyt</category><category>nytimes</category><category>recession</category><category>steve jobs</category><category>SteveJobs</category><category>water</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex Salkever]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 07:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[How much of the business press will disappear?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/06/how-much-of-the-business-press-will-disappear/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/06/how-much-of-the-business-press-will-disappear/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/06/how-much-of-the-business-press-will-disappear/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p>This website is in the business and financial news business. So are a number of other online financial sites like <em>SeekingAlpha, TheBigMoney, ClusterStock, and Minyanville. </em>Just a few years ago, none of these operations existed.</p>
<p>Last year, advertising pages in tradition business magazine like <em>BusinessWeek</em> and <em>Forbes </em>were down by double digits. With the recession deepening and marketers pulling back, 2009 may not be any better.</p>
<p>On TV, there are now two business channels, <em>CNBC</em> and <em>Fox, </em>which is barely a year old and has horrible audience numbers. So far. But <em>CNBC </em>is owned by <a href="http://www.kcra.com/news/18334106/detail.html">GE </a>(NYSE:<a href="http://www.kcra.com/news/18334106/detail.html">GE</a>) and <em>Fox </em>is owned by <a href="http://www.kcra.com/news/18334106/detail.html">News Corp</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://www.kcra.com/news/18334106/detail.html">NWS</a>). That means both are likely to be around for a long time. They both compete against Bloomberg TV.<br /></p>
<p>In the news service business, <em>Bloomberg, Reuters, </em>and the <em>AP</em> all have large financial reporting operations. In the newspaper business, <em>The Wall Street Journal</em> and <em>The New York Times </em>compete for readers.</p>
<p>Lest you say that this post is just a bunch of names typed onto a page, consider that the economic downturn will not support all of these media. Advertising will disappear. Perhaps more frightening, as people pull money out of the stock market, the interest in investing will drop. As investment professionals are fired, they may drop out of the business news consumption population as well.</p>
<p>Who may not make it? The traditional business magazines publish on weekly or fortnightly cycles. That is too long a time between articles in a world where the web delivers information in real time. They may not get enough readers on the internet to offset sales lost in print.</p>
<p>One thing for certain. A number of the operations with their names in this piece won't be here in 2010.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 237wallst.com.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/06/how-much-of-the-business-press-will-disappear/">How much of the business press will disappear?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 06 Jan 2009 09:38:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/06/how-much-of-the-business-press-will-disappear/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1419802/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/01/06/how-much-of-the-business-press-will-disappear/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>advertising</category><category>Clusterstock</category><category>GE</category><category>inthenews</category><category>media</category><category>NWS</category><category>NY Times</category><category>NyTimes</category><category>Seeking Alpha</category><category>SeekingAlpha</category><category>Wall Street Journal</category><category>WallStreetJournal</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 09:38:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[If McCain had a sense of humor]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/22/if-mccain-had-a-sense-of-humor/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/22/if-mccain-had-a-sense-of-humor/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/22/if-mccain-had-a-sense-of-humor/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/press-releases/" rel="tag">Press Releases</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/john_mccain_mark_wilson_20080211.jpg" /></p>
<p>The ridiculous story published by the New York times yesterday regarding John McCain's encounters with a Washington lobbyist offered little to it's readers or the voting American public. It was a waste of time on talk shows and the broader media coverage it received shows how petty election politics can be.</p>
<p>Every official in Washington is constantly being bombarded by thousands of lobbyist's all the time and someone in McCains position (and Obama's and Clinton's) get no relief. If his wife is not griping when he gets closer to some then others and they happen to be attractive too, we have nothing to say about it, unless it crosses some legal or ethical boundary.</p>
<p>McCain was unhappy. I was unhappy and most pundits I listened to thought as much of the story as I did. However, I might have handled it with some good humor. <strong><em>McCain should have issued a press release with pictures of the top 100 best looking lobbyists</em></strong> (male and female) that he has met with over the past five years. Let them run that in the New Yorks Times. Now that would spark huge readership.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/24/about-the-stock-bloggers-sheldon-d-liber-aia/"><em><strong>Sheldon Liber</strong></em></a><em> is the CEO of a small private investment company and the principal for design and research at an architecture &amp; planning firm. <span class="symbol"><em>He writes the columns </em><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/chasing-value/"><em>Chasing Value</em></a><em> and </em><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/serious-money/"><em>Serious Money</em></a><em>.</em></span></em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/22/if-mccain-had-a-sense-of-humor/">If McCain had a sense of humor</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 22 Feb 2008 15:58:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/22/if-mccain-had-a-sense-of-humor/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1122296/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/22/if-mccain-had-a-sense-of-humor/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Humor</category><category>John McCain</category><category>JohnMccain</category><category>Liber</category><category>lobbyists</category><category>NY Times</category><category>NyTimes</category><category>politics</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 15:58:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Media World: New York Times may have done John McCain a favor]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/22/media-world-new-york-times-may-have-done-john-mccain-a-favor/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/22/media-world-new-york-times-may-have-done-john-mccain-a-favor/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/22/media-world-new-york-times-may-have-done-john-mccain-a-favor/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/presidential-elections/" rel="tag">Presidential Elections</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/nytphoto.jpg" />Ever since the<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys"> New York Times</a> broke the story about John McCain's close relationship with lobbyist Vicki Iseman, howls of outrage have been heard from one end of the right wing media world to the other. Outstanding Americans including<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/21/rush-limbaugh-rushes-to-john-mccains-defense/"> Rush Limbaugh </a>have accused the gray lady of publishing a partisan hatchet job on the Arizona senator who until this moment had been their public enemy no. 2 behind the mainstream media.<br /><br />The story that McCain's aides tried to protect him because they were worried that their boss was having an extramarital affair with <a href="http://ketchupandeggs.wordpress.com/2008/02/21/john-mccains-odd-relationship-with-a-lobbyist/">lobbyist Vicki Iseman struck a nerve.</a> My colleague <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/22/new-york-times-hit-job-on-mccain-hits-stock-more-than-mccain/">Aaron Katsman</a> called it a "hit job", and investors who have long ago soured on newspaper stocks sent shares of the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys">New York Times Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys">NYT</a>) downward. Meanwhile, a potential proxy fight looms with <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/dissident-investor-increases-nyt-stake/n20080221191109990013">dissident shareholder Harbinger Capital</a>.<br /><br />But lost in the hoopla is the fact that the central theme of the story that aides were worried about McCain's relationship with Iseman during the 2000 campaign has been proven. In fact, other news organizations, including the <span style="font-style: italic;">Washington Post</span> , were able to match the story. In fact, the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/21/AR2008022101131.html?hpid=topnews">Post </a>is reporting today that McCain has some cozy relationship with other lobbyists even though he bad-mouths the profession all of the time. Both McCain and Iseman deny they had an affair or that she received any preferential treatment from the senator. Nonetheless, some former McCain aides were clearly worried about the lobbyist.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/22/media-world-new-york-times-may-have-done-john-mccain-a-favor/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Media World: New York Times may have done John McCain a favor</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/22/media-world-new-york-times-may-have-done-john-mccain-a-favor/">Media World: New York Times may have done John McCain a favor</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 22 Feb 2008 14:19:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/21/rush-limbaugh-rushes-to-john-mccains-defense/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/22/media-world-new-york-times-may-have-done-john-mccain-a-favor/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1122020/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/22/media-world-new-york-times-may-have-done-john-mccain-a-favor/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Harbinger Capital</category><category>HarbingerCapital</category><category>inthenews</category><category>John McCain</category><category>JohnMccain</category><category>NY Times</category><category>NYT</category><category>NyTimes</category><category>proxy fights</category><category>ProxyFights</category><category>Republicans</category><category>Vicki Iseman</category><category>VickiIseman</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 14:19:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Eli Lilly lawyer sent important memo to The New York Times by mistake]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/05/eli-lilly-lawyer-sent-important-memo-to-the-new-york-times-by-mi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/05/eli-lilly-lawyer-sent-important-memo-to-the-new-york-times-by-mi/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/05/eli-lilly-lawyer-sent-important-memo-to-the-new-york-times-by-mi/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/lly/" rel="tag">Lilly (Eli) (LLY)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/02/lilly.jpg" alt="" />When the <em><a href="http://www.nytimes.com">New York Times</a></em> recently broke a story that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/eli-lilly-and-company/lly/nys?from=lookup">Eli Lilly &amp; Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/eli-lilly-and-company/lly/nys?from=lookup">LLY</a>) was in confidential settlement talks with the federal government, the drugmaker was furious over the leak believing government officials were behind it. The company was probably enraged when it learned that one of its own lawyers accidentally sent a memo to a<em> Times</em> reporter about the settlement talks over whether it had improperly marketed Zyprexa.<br /><br />"One of its outside lawyers at Philadelphia-based Pepper Hamilton had mistakenly emailed confidential information on the talks to <em>Times</em> reporter <em>Alex </em>Berenson instead of <em>Bradford </em>Berenson, her co-counsel at Sidley Austin," according to <a href="http://www.portfolio.com/news-markets/top-5/2008/02/05/Eli-Lilly-E-Mail-to-New-York-Times">Portfolio.com. </a>"With the negotiations over alleged marketing improprieties reaching a mind-boggling sum of $1 billion, Eli Lilly had every reason to want to keep the talks under wraps. It was paying the two fancy law firms a small fortune to negotiate deftly and quietly."<br /><br />Pepper Hamilton was no doubt mortified but the Indianapolis-based drugmaker told the magazine that it would continue to retain the firm. Odds are good that there will be an adjustment or two to Lilly's hefty legal bill.<br /><br />This goes to show you that even the most sophisticated technology can't save people from their own thoughtless mistakes.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/05/eli-lilly-lawyer-sent-important-memo-to-the-new-york-times-by-mi/">Eli Lilly lawyer sent important memo to The New York Times by mistake</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 05 Feb 2008 17:14:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.portfolio.com/news-markets/top-5/2008/02/05/Eli-Lilly-E-Mail-to-New-York-Times>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/05/eli-lilly-lawyer-sent-important-memo-to-the-new-york-times-by-mi/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1107551/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/05/eli-lilly-lawyer-sent-important-memo-to-the-new-york-times-by-mi/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>alex berenson</category><category>AlexBerenson</category><category>fda</category><category>lly</category><category>new york times</category><category>NewYorkTimes</category><category>ny times</category><category>NyTimes</category><category>Zyprexa.</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 17:14:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[New York Times, CNBC partner to thwart Fox Business Network]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/07/new-york-times-cnbc-partner-to-thwart-fox-business-network/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/07/new-york-times-cnbc-partner-to-thwart-fox-business-network/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/07/new-york-times-cnbc-partner-to-thwart-fox-business-network/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nyt/" rel="tag">New York Times'A' (NYT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a></p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys">The New York Times Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-new-york-times-company/nyt/nys">NYT</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">GE</a>)'s CNBC have agreed to share each other's content, a move designed to counter the synergies that the $5 billion acquisition of Dow Jones brought to Rupert Murdoch's <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">News Corp</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys">NWS</a>) empire.<br /><br />Under the terms of the agreement, <em>Times</em> articles will be posted on CNBC's website while the cable channel's video will be on the newspaper's website, according to a story in the <em><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/07/business/media/07paper.html?_r=1&amp;oref=slogin">New York Times</a></em>. Though content-sharing agreements are as common as mud, this one is worth watching because it's so high profile.<br /><br />It wouldn't surprise me if the <em>Times</em> and CNBC eventually did joint projects, particularly time-consuming investigative stories. Also, expect the <em>Times</em> op-ed columnists such as Frank Rich and Paul Krugman to make more appearances on CNBC shows, no doubt much to the horror of Larry Kudlow.<br /><br />Though Fox Business Network could get better ratings shouting the news over bullhorn in the middle of Manhattan, CNBC can't afford to take the fledging network for granted. After all, Murdoch now has at his disposal some of the best business journalists in the world who could whip his CNBC competitor into shape,.<br /><br /><em>NOTE: I've done freelance writing for </em>The New York Times<em>.</em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/07/new-york-times-cnbc-partner-to-thwart-fox-business-network/">New York Times, CNBC partner to thwart Fox Business Network</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 07 Jan 2008 09:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/07/business/media/07paper.html?_r=1&amp;oref=slogin>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/07/new-york-times-cnbc-partner-to-thwart-fox-business-network/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1079314/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/07/new-york-times-cnbc-partner-to-thwart-fox-business-network/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CNBC</category><category>FOX</category><category>FOX BUSINESS NETWORK</category><category>FoxBusinessNetwork</category><category>frank rich</category><category>FrankRich</category><category>inthenews</category><category>larry kudlow</category><category>LarryKudlow</category><category>NY TIMES</category><category>NyTimes</category><category>paul krugman</category><category>PaulKrugman</category><category>RUPERT MURDOCH</category><category>RupertMurdoch</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 09:35:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
