<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Oil Prices Drop 3% on Economic Fears]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/30/oil-prices-drop-on-economic-fears/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/30/oil-prices-drop-on-economic-fears/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/30/oil-prices-drop-on-economic-fears/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/currency/" rel="tag">Currency</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/falling-oil.gif" alt="Oil Prices Fall 3%" />Tuesday was a tough day for oil traders, with <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20100629-711343.html">oil prices falling 3%</a> to a two-week low.</p>
<p>The main thing spooking traders was a report that indicated growth in China was running lower than previously expected.</p>
<p>The Conference Board announced that, when it previously released that China's leading economic indicator rose by 1.7% during April, there was a calculation error. Instead of growing by 1.7% in April, it actually grew by a mere 0.3%.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/30/oil-prices-drop-on-economic-fears/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Oil Prices Drop 3% on Economic Fears</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/30/oil-prices-drop-on-economic-fears/">Oil Prices Drop 3% on Economic Fears</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 30 Jun 2010 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/30/oil-prices-drop-on-economic-fears/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19535938/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/30/oil-prices-drop-on-economic-fears/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>China</category><category>dollar</category><category>economic fears</category><category>economy</category><category>euro</category><category>europe</category><category>featured</category><category>gas</category><category>gasoline</category><category>inthenews</category><category>oil</category><category>oil consumption</category><category>oil inventory</category><category>oil prices</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Placing blame for high oil prices]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/06/placing-blame-for-high-oil-prices/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/06/placing-blame-for-high-oil-prices/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/06/placing-blame-for-high-oil-prices/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/india/" rel="tag">India</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p><p>The headline in <em>The New York Times </em>reads "<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/06/business/06oil.html?_r=1&amp;ref=business&amp;oref=slogin">American Energy Policy, Asleep At the Spigot</a>." The rise in old prices could have been prevented to some extent. The question is who is at fault. Describing how out of control crude consumption is in the U.S., the paper writes, "Home to only 4 percent of the world's population, the nation slurps up about a quarter of the planet's oil -- and Americans' daily use is nearly twice the combined consumption of the Chinese and Indians."</p>
<p>Well said, and true. But, the actions described are terribly American and could not, under the current economic and government system, have been prevented. </p>
<p>Oil consumption is not unlike the use of cigarettes or liquor. The government can tell citizens that the behavior is dangerous. It can even raises taxes on the products to remarkable levels. But, it is not willing to legislate limited use of oil. It is not willing to create a "Prohibition" like Congress did when it tried to eliminate drinking. The attempt lasted from 1920 to 1933. Americans drank right through the 13 years.</p>
<p>No matter how bad the oil crisis is now, on the consumption side, the U.S. government is poorly equipped to change the behavior of its citizens unless there is a period of emergency. In WW II, people were willing to go along with restrictions in their use of certain goods and services, like rubber. </p>
<p>With gas over $4 and going higher, the present turmoil has the hallmarks of a grave danger. Perhaps it is time for Congress to pass an "Emergency Gas Act." Nothing short of that is going to change how fossil fuels are consumed.</p>
<p><em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com. </em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/06/placing-blame-for-high-oil-prices/">Placing blame for high oil prices</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 06 Jul 2008 05:46:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/06/placing-blame-for-high-oil-prices/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1246639/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/07/06/placing-blame-for-high-oil-prices/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><category>oil consumption</category><category>oil prices</category><category>oil rationing</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 05:46:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[When $100 oil may not, in fact, be $100 oil]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/06/when-100-oil-may-not-in-fact-be-100-oil/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/06/when-100-oil-may-not-in-fact-be-100-oil/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/06/when-100-oil-may-not-in-fact-be-100-oil/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/russia/" rel="tag">Russia</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/venezuela/" rel="tag">Venezuela</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p><p>As oil trades near $100 per barrel, one of the questions economists and analysts are asking is why hasn't global energy demand moderated?</p>
<p>With only isolated exceptions, both oil use in emerging markets and gasoline use here in the United States continue to increase. Emerging markets, particularly China, continue to register sizable increases in oil use. There has been some slackening of the increase in gasoline consumption in the U.S. as gasoline rose again above $3 per gallon this year, but not enough to cause a substantial drop in prices at the pump.</p>
<p>Is <a href="http://www.nymex.com">+$90 oil</a> a price that's too costly for nations? Economist David H. Wang says perhaps not, particularly if a nation is not, in effect, paying the spot price, and he argues that a little-publicized fact regarding the oil market may be stoking demand. Namely: oil pacts among oil producing and consuming nations below the spot price for oil.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/06/when-100-oil-may-not-in-fact-be-100-oil/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>When $100 oil may not, in fact, be $100 oil</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/06/when-100-oil-may-not-in-fact-be-100-oil/">When $100 oil may not, in fact, be $100 oil</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 06 Jan 2008 09:25:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/06/when-100-oil-may-not-in-fact-be-100-oil/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1078920/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/06/when-100-oil-may-not-in-fact-be-100-oil/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>China</category><category>emerging markets</category><category>gasoline prices</category><category>GDP</category><category>oil</category><category>oil consumption</category><category>oil prices</category><category>Russia</category><category>U.S. economy</category><category>Venezuela</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 09:25:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Oil jumps above $98 on inventory concerns, Nigerian strife]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/02/oil-jumps-above-98-on-inventory-concerns-nigerian-strife/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/02/oil-jumps-above-98-on-inventory-concerns-nigerian-strife/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/02/oil-jumps-above-98-on-inventory-concerns-nigerian-strife/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/10/risingoil.jpg" alt="" />Oil surged above $98 per barrel Wednesday on expectations that U.S. oil stockpiles declined for a seventh consecutive week, <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aRUTAi1QYe24&amp;refer=home">Bloomberg News</a> reported Wednesday. <br /><br />Oil rose $2.31 to $98.29 before pulling back slightly to $97.75, as traders attempted to gauge both U.S. demand and geopolitical factors affecting supply as the new year dawns.<br /><br /><strong>Demand, Nigeria weigh</strong><br /><br />Independent energy trader Jim Dietz told BloggingStocks Wednesday that unrest in Nigeria is also putting energy traders' moods in a bullish frame of mind.<br /><br />"We've got the political situation in Nigeria popping up again where 12 people were killed by militants and a near-unanimous consensus that U.S. stock piles will be lower, so that's more than enough to send this oil market higher," Dietz said. "I know it's not what consumers want to hear at the start of a new year, but oil and heating oil prices are heading higher, at least for the short-term."
<p><a href="http://www.nymex.com">Heating oil</a> gained about 4 cents to $2.69, while <a href="http://www.nymex.com">unleaded gasoline</a> rose 5 cents to $2.53 in Wednesday morning trading. <a href="http://www.nymex.com">Natural gas</a> gained 17 cents to $7.65 per million BTUs.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/02/oil-jumps-above-98-on-inventory-concerns-nigerian-strife/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Oil jumps above $98 on inventory concerns, Nigerian strife</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/02/oil-jumps-above-98-on-inventory-concerns-nigerian-strife/">Oil jumps above $98 on inventory concerns, Nigerian strife</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 02 Jan 2008 10:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/02/oil-jumps-above-98-on-inventory-concerns-nigerian-strife/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1075298/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/02/oil-jumps-above-98-on-inventory-concerns-nigerian-strife/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>gasoline</category><category>gasoline prices</category><category>heating oil</category><category>heating oil prices</category><category>heating systems</category><category>Jim Dietz</category><category>JimDietz</category><category>NYMEX</category><category>oil</category><category>oil consumption</category><category>oil demand</category><category>oil prices</category><category>oil supply</category><category>OPEC</category><category>winter</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 10:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Oil idles near $88 as traders digest OPEC's decision]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/06/oil-idles-near-88-as-traders-digest-opecs-decision/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/06/oil-idles-near-88-as-traders-digest-opecs-decision/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/06/oil-idles-near-88-as-traders-digest-opecs-decision/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xom/" rel="tag">Exxon Mobil (XOM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/middle-east/" rel="tag">Middle East</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/venezuela/" rel="tag">Venezuela</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cvx/" rel="tag">Chevron Corp (CVX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cop/" rel="tag">ConocoPhillips (COP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bp/" rel="tag">BP p.l.c. ADS (BP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/08/539205_sittin_by_the_dock_of_the_bay.jpg" />Crude oil rose slightly Thursday at midday, as traders digested the market impact of OPEC's decision in Abu Dhabi to maintain current oil production levels.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.nymex.com">Crude oil</a> gained 55 cents to $88.54. <a href="http://www.nymex.com">Heating oil</a> rose 2 cents to $2.51 and <a href="http://www.nymex.com">unleaded gasoline</a> rose 3 cents to $2.25.<br /><br />Despite elevated oil prices, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries Wednesday opted to maintain current production levels, brushing aside calls to pump more crude oil in order to help lower -- what many believe -- oil price that may further slow the U.S. and global economies.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/06/oil-idles-near-88-as-traders-digest-opecs-decision/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Oil idles near $88 as traders digest OPEC's decision</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/06/oil-idles-near-88-as-traders-digest-opecs-decision/">Oil idles near $88 as traders digest OPEC's decision</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 06 Dec 2007 13:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/06/oil-idles-near-88-as-traders-digest-opecs-decision/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1056526/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/06/oil-idles-near-88-as-traders-digest-opecs-decision/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>emerging markets</category><category>featured</category><category>gasoline</category><category>gasoline prices</category><category>GDP</category><category>global economy</category><category>heating oil</category><category>heating oil prices</category><category>NYMEX</category><category>oil</category><category>oil consumption</category><category>oil prices</category><category>oil production</category><category>OPEC</category><category>U.S. economy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 13:35:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[For DJIA, 3 up days and a technical hurdle cleared]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/30/for-djia-3-up-days-and-a-technical-hurdle-cleared/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/30/for-djia-3-up-days-and-a-technical-hurdle-cleared/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/30/for-djia-3-up-days-and-a-technical-hurdle-cleared/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/after-the-bell/" rel="tag">After the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/middle-east/" rel="tag">Middle East</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/c/" rel="tag">Citigroup Inc. (C)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wb/" rel="tag">Wachovia Corp (WB)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/analysis/" rel="tag">Technical Analysis</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wfc/" rel="tag">Wells Fargo (WFC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/djia/" rel="tag">DJIA</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/housing/" rel="tag">Housing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a></p>True, no one on the trading floor of the New York Stock Exchange Friday yelled, <a href="http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/1990s">"It's a return to the 'Roaring 90s,' "</a> but given the way the U.S. economy and the stock market have gone in 2007, it's a start. <br /><br />The <a href="http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui">Dow Jones Industrial Average</a> closed Friday up 59.98 points to <a href="http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui">13,371.71</a> - - hardly the stuff of a headline, but it was a technically-significant day. <br /><br />The Dow's accomplishment? On Friday the Dow closed above the critical <a href="http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui">200-day moving average at 13,250.10</a> - - the toughest moving average to break - - for the third consecutive day. Technical analysts argue that three consecutive closes above the 200-day moving average is a bullish sign. [For background on the Dow and the <a href="http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui">200-day moving average,</a> click on this bloggingstocks link: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/29/fed-be-nimble-fed-be-quick/">"Fed be nimble, Fed be quick."</a>]<br /><br />Hence, the Dow has cleared a major technical hurdle. The 'three closes above 200' does not guarantee that the rally will continue, but it is a step in the right direction.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/30/for-djia-3-up-days-and-a-technical-hurdle-cleared/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>For DJIA, 3 up days and a technical hurdle cleared</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/30/for-djia-3-up-days-and-a-technical-hurdle-cleared/">For DJIA, 3 up days and a technical hurdle cleared</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 30 Nov 2007 18:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/30/for-djia-3-up-days-and-a-technical-hurdle-cleared/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1052188/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/30/for-djia-3-up-days-and-a-technical-hurdle-cleared/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>banking sector</category><category>banks</category><category>Bernanke</category><category>DJIA</category><category>Dow Jones Industrial Average</category><category>economy</category><category>GDP</category><category>housing</category><category>interest rates</category><category>inthenews</category><category>monetary policy</category><category>mortgage defaults</category><category>mortgages</category><category>oil</category><category>oil consumption</category><category>oil prices</category><category>oil production</category><category>OPEC</category><category>Paulson</category><category>Saudi Arabia</category><category>subprime</category><category>subprime mortgages</category><category>technical Analysis</category><category>U.S. economy</category><category>U.S. Federal Reserve</category><category>U.S. Treasury</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 18:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Oil falls below $90 after Canada pipeline re-opens]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/30/oil-falls-below-90-after-canada-pipeline-re-opens/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/30/oil-falls-below-90-after-canada-pipeline-re-opens/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/30/oil-falls-below-90-after-canada-pipeline-re-opens/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/russia/" rel="tag">Russia</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/middle-east/" rel="tag">Middle East</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/venezuela/" rel="tag">Venezuela</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mexico/" rel="tag">Mexico</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/canada/" rel="tag">Canada</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p>Oil fell below $90 per barrel for the first time in a month Friday, after Enbridge Inc. reopened the biggest pipeline to the U.S. from Canada, <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=apC_GQTlluWA&amp;refer=home">Bloomberg News reported.</a> <br /><br /><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=apC_GQTlluWA&amp;refer=home">Crude</a> declined $1.67 to $89.34. <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=apC_GQTlluWA&amp;refer=home">Heating oil</a> fell about 4 cents to $2.53, and <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=apC_GQTlluWA&amp;refer=home">unleaded gasoline</a> declined 3 cents to $2.23.<br /><br />Independent Energy Trader Jim Dietz told Bloggingtocks Friday that the Canada pipeline accident was a momentary event that only temporarily deflected the oil market away from an ongoing oil price pullback. <br /><br />"With OPEC's likely production increase, sentiment has shifted to a continued pull-back for oil. If we close below $90 per barrel today, that would be bearish for oil, short-term, but good news for just about everybody else, I guess," Dietz said. <br /><br />Saudi Arabia, OPEC's biggest producer, indicated it will increase production by 500,000 barrels of spare capacity in December to ensure that consumers are adequately supplied, Oil Minister Ali al-Naimi said in Singapore on Nov. 28, <a href="http://today.reuters.com/news/articleinvesting.aspx?type=hotStocksNews&amp;storyID=2007-11-30T134432Z_01_SP217792_RTRUKOC_0_US-MARKETS-OIL.xml">Reuters reported.</a> <br /><br /><strong>Safety cushion</strong><br /><br />Dietz said oil demand remains strong, but OPEC's effort, led by Saudi Arabia, increases the oil market's safety cushion, or the difference between global oil supply and demand. <br /><br />"Traders are confident now that there will be enough oil for the [Northern Hemisphere] winter," Dietz said. "The Saudi's decision makes an enormous difference in this market. There's even a chance that some crude supplies could begin to build in certain areas, which would be a change for this market."<br /><br />The 10 OPEC countries subject to quotas will supply 27.5 million barrels a day this month, according to the <a href="http://www.eia.doe.gov/">U.S. Energy Information Agency.</a> OPEC's official production target is 27.25 million barrels per day.<br /><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/30/oil-falls-below-90-after-canada-pipeline-re-opens/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Oil falls below $90 after Canada pipeline re-opens</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/30/oil-falls-below-90-after-canada-pipeline-re-opens/">Oil falls below $90 after Canada pipeline re-opens</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 30 Nov 2007 10:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/30/oil-falls-below-90-after-canada-pipeline-re-opens/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1051738/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/30/oil-falls-below-90-after-canada-pipeline-re-opens/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>gasoline</category><category>gasoline prices</category><category>heating oil</category><category>heating oil prices</category><category>oil</category><category>oil consumption</category><category>oil prices</category><category>oil production</category><category>OPEC</category><category>Saudi Arabia</category><category>U.S. economy</category><category>U.S. Energy Information Agency</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 10:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Are hedge funds distorting the price of oil?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/29/are-hedge-funds-distorting-the-price-of-oil/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/29/are-hedge-funds-distorting-the-price-of-oil/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/29/are-hedge-funds-distorting-the-price-of-oil/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xom/" rel="tag">Exxon Mobil (XOM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/russia/" rel="tag">Russia</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/middle-east/" rel="tag">Middle East</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/venezuela/" rel="tag">Venezuela</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cvx/" rel="tag">Chevron Corp (CVX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cop/" rel="tag">ConocoPhillips (COP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bp/" rel="tag">BP p.l.c. ADS (BP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mexico/" rel="tag">Mexico</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/canada/" rel="tag">Canada</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p><a href="http://www.hedgeworld.com/">Hedge funds</a>, which control more than $2 trillion in assets, and when one includes leverage, substantially more than that, are an institution that has helped produce massive increases in trading volumes and financial transactions in the last decade. <br /><br />Further, together with wealth management investment funds, private equity funds, and of course investment banks and brokers, these institutions form the bulk of the market's "shorter-term players" - - organizations that are likely to have an investment horizon that is shorter than the typical person's. They're also more-likely to use aggressive investment techniques and invest in high-risk instruments. <br /><br />Few deny that the above institutions, particularly hedge funds, with their buying power and volumes, have increased market liquidity.<br /><br />However, lately a growing chorus is beginning to question the ultimate impact of hedge funds, and comparable players. Namely, they're asking if hedge funds and their companions are distorting prices of commodities, stocks, and other investments.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/29/are-hedge-funds-distorting-the-price-of-oil/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Are hedge funds distorting the price of oil?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/29/are-hedge-funds-distorting-the-price-of-oil/">Are hedge funds distorting the price of oil?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 29 Nov 2007 18:34:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/29/are-hedge-funds-distorting-the-price-of-oil/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1051206/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/29/are-hedge-funds-distorting-the-price-of-oil/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Ali Al-Naimi</category><category>brokers</category><category>hedge funds</category><category>investing</category><category>investment banks</category><category>investment management funds</category><category>Iran</category><category>oil</category><category>oil consumption</category><category>oil demand</category><category>oil prices</category><category>oil production</category><category>oil supply</category><category>OPEC</category><category>private equity</category><category>return on investment</category><category>Saudi Arabia</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 18:34:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Russia says oil production growth to slow]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/19/russia-says-oil-production-growth-to-slow/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/19/russia-says-oil-production-growth-to-slow/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/19/russia-says-oil-production-growth-to-slow/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xom/" rel="tag">Exxon Mobil (XOM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/russia/" rel="tag">Russia</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cvx/" rel="tag">Chevron Corp (CVX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cop/" rel="tag">ConocoPhillips (COP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bp/" rel="tag">BP p.l.c. ADS (BP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mexico/" rel="tag">Mexico</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/canada/" rel="tag">Canada</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p><div align="justify">Russia tempered the enthusiasm of oil supply bulls when it announced that it expected oil production to grow only modestly over the next several years. <br /><br />Russia, the world's no. 2 crude exporter after Saudi Arabia, said production would increase to only about 10.4 million barrels per day, up only 6% from the current 9.8 million barrels per day, <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119518128213295284.html?mod=googlenews_wsj"><em>The Wall Street Journal</em> reported</a> [Subscription required].<br /><br />Viktor Khristenko, Russia's oil minister, said Russia has promising oil finds in Eastern Siberia, Arctic North and Sakhalin Island, but that Russia would not duplicate the superior +10% oil production growth the nation has achieved earlier this decade.</div><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/19/russia-says-oil-production-growth-to-slow/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Russia says oil production growth to slow</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/19/russia-says-oil-production-growth-to-slow/">Russia says oil production growth to slow</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 19 Nov 2007 10:48:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119518128213295284.html?mod=googlenews_wsj>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/19/russia-says-oil-production-growth-to-slow/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1043151/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/19/russia-says-oil-production-growth-to-slow/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>alternative energy</category><category>Arctic</category><category>Asia</category><category>climate change</category><category>conservation</category><category>emerging markets</category><category>environment</category><category>Europe</category><category>gasoline</category><category>gasoline prices</category><category>GDP</category><category>global economy</category><category>inthenews</category><category>oil</category><category>oil consumption</category><category>oil exploration</category><category>oil prices</category><category>OPEC</category><category>Russia</category><category>Saudi Arabia</category><category>SaudiArabia</category><category>Siberia</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 10:48:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[No small favors: Saudis say no oil production hike ahead]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/13/no-small-favors-saudis-say-no-oil-production-hike-ahead/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/13/no-small-favors-saudis-say-no-oil-production-hike-ahead/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/13/no-small-favors-saudis-say-no-oil-production-hike-ahead/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xom/" rel="tag">Exxon Mobil (XOM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/middle-east/" rel="tag">Middle East</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cvx/" rel="tag">Chevron Corp (CVX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cop/" rel="tag">ConocoPhillips (COP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bp/" rel="tag">BP p.l.c. ADS (BP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/oklahoma-city-oil-derrick.jpg" />A day after word spread through the oil markets suggesting that Saudi Arabia was set to press for a 500,000-barrel OPEC oil output increase, Saudi Arabia's oil minister said Tuesday that OPEC members will not announce an increase in oil production at an oil producers summit this weekend. <br /><br />"There will be absolutely no discussion" of a production increase when the meeting convenes in Riyadh, the Saudi capital, Saudi Oil Minister Ali Naimi said, the <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/a22562ba-914c-11dc-9590-0000779fd2ac.html"><em>Financial Times</em> reported.</a><br /><br />The markets had factored-in an OPEC production hike, a fact that helped oil prices pull-back more than $4 from recent highs. Oil continued to drift lower Tuesday, falling $1.00 to $93.62 in morning trading.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/13/no-small-favors-saudis-say-no-oil-production-hike-ahead/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>No small favors: Saudis say no oil production hike ahead</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/13/no-small-favors-saudis-say-no-oil-production-hike-ahead/">No small favors: Saudis say no oil production hike ahead</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 13 Nov 2007 11:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/a22562ba-914c-11dc-9590-0000779fd2ac.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/13/no-small-favors-saudis-say-no-oil-production-hike-ahead/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1038797/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/13/no-small-favors-saudis-say-no-oil-production-hike-ahead/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>emerging markets</category><category>featured</category><category>gasoline</category><category>gasoline prices</category><category>GDP</category><category>global economy</category><category>heating oil</category><category>heating oil prices</category><category>Naimi</category><category>oil</category><category>oil consumption</category><category>oil prices</category><category>oil production</category><category>OPEC</category><category>Saudi Arabia</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 11:35:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[IEA's global oil demand projection isn't pretty]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/08/ieas-global-oil-demand-projection-isnt-pretty/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/08/ieas-global-oil-demand-projection-isnt-pretty/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/08/ieas-global-oil-demand-projection-isnt-pretty/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xom/" rel="tag">Exxon Mobil (XOM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/india/" rel="tag">India</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/brazil/" rel="tag">Brazil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/russia/" rel="tag">Russia</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/middle-east/" rel="tag">Middle East</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/venezuela/" rel="tag">Venezuela</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/thailand/" rel="tag">Thailand</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cvx/" rel="tag">Chevron Corp (CVX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cop/" rel="tag">ConocoPhillips (COP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bp/" rel="tag">BP p.l.c. ADS (BP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mexico/" rel="tag">Mexico</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/canada/" rel="tag">Canada</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/japan/" rel="tag">Japan</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/eastern-europe/" rel="tag">Eastern Europe</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/israel/" rel="tag">Israel</a></p>If the industrialized - - and the industrializing - - world needs a wake-up call regarding the development of alternate and renewable energy sources, the nations need look no further than the <a href="http://www.worldenergyoutlook.org/">International Energy Agency's</a> research. <br /><br />IEA projects that between now and 2015, the world will need an additional 37.5 million barrels per day of oil to meet rising demand. Currently, the world use about 84 million barrels of oil per day. [Oil closed Thursday down 91 cents to $95.46. A convergence of events, including strong global economic growth and geopolitical concerns, has pushed oil's price up more than 135% in three years; traders see oil testing the $100 per barrel mark in the weeks ahead.]<br /><br />And here's the riveting statistic from the IEA: current oil production development plans will add only about 25 million barrels per day by 2015.<br /><br />And what about that 12.5-million barrel gap? The gap, the IEA said, must be made up through further investment or easing of demand. <br /><br />If the gap is not filled, a supply shortfall will result, the IEA said. "'A supply-side crunch in the period to 2015, involving an abrupt escalation in oil prices, cannot be ruled out," the agency said.<br /><br /><strong>Oil Analysis:</strong> While oil consumption increases are expected in every region in the world and by dozens of nations, the importance of the United States and China in marshaling any energy coalition cannot be underscored enough. Each is the primary engine of growth in its hemisphere. Each has the private, public, and university-based economies of scale necessary to both implement conservation measures and development new energy sources - - practices that smaller nations in each region would undoubtedly mirror. Finally, each - - by virtue of the sheer size of their consumer bases - - can decisively "move the needle" toward increased energy efficiency and, along with it, toward less CO2 in the atmosphere, in the years and decades ahead.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/08/ieas-global-oil-demand-projection-isnt-pretty/">IEA's global oil demand projection isn't pretty</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 08 Nov 2007 17:44:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/08/ieas-global-oil-demand-projection-isnt-pretty/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1034424/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/08/ieas-global-oil-demand-projection-isnt-pretty/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Africa</category><category>alternative energy</category><category>Asia</category><category>China</category><category>climate change</category><category>developing world</category><category>emerging markets</category><category>environment</category><category>Europe</category><category>IEA</category><category>International Energy Agency</category><category>North America</category><category>oil</category><category>oil consumption</category><category>oil production</category><category>OPEC</category><category>renewable energy</category><category>South America</category><category>United States</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 17:44:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Two new oil data points: One positive, one negative]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/02/two-new-oil-data-points-1-positive-1-negative/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/02/two-new-oil-data-points-1-positive-1-negative/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/02/two-new-oil-data-points-1-positive-1-negative/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xom/" rel="tag">Exxon Mobil (XOM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cvx/" rel="tag">Chevron Corp (CVX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cop/" rel="tag">ConocoPhillips (COP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p>The markets have two additional oil industry data points to digest Friday, and through the weekend: <br /><br /><strong>First the good news:</strong> OPEC (Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries) has increased oil production in response to sustained +$90 per barrel prices.<br /><br />OPEC's 10 members bound by output targets, all except Iraq and Angola, pumped 26.98 million barrels per day, up 180,000 barrels per day from September 2007, according to the survey of oil firms, traders, OPEC officials and analysts, <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/idUSL0250869320071102">Reuters reported </a>Friday.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/02/two-new-oil-data-points-1-positive-1-negative/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Two new oil data points: One positive, one negative</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/02/two-new-oil-data-points-1-positive-1-negative/">Two new oil data points: One positive, one negative</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 02 Nov 2007 15:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/idUSL0250869320071102>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/02/two-new-oil-data-points-1-positive-1-negative/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1028164/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/02/two-new-oil-data-points-1-positive-1-negative/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Cambridge Energy Research Associates</category><category>COP</category><category>CVX</category><category>Daniel Yergin</category><category>gasoline</category><category>gasoline prices</category><category>heating oil</category><category>oil</category><category>oil companies</category><category>oil consumption</category><category>oil production</category><category>OPEC</category><category>refineries</category><category>refinery capacity</category><category>SUN</category><category>XOM</category><category>Yergin</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 15:28:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Up ahead: Conservation or $100 / barrel oil?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/12/up-ahead-conservation-or-100-barrel-oil/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/12/up-ahead-conservation-or-100-barrel-oil/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/12/up-ahead-conservation-or-100-barrel-oil/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/fly-logo-live.gif" alt="" />On the heels of oil's push through $79 per barrel, with traders indicating that a move through $80 is likely, the elevated price of oil is once again placing itself on the table of concerns facing investors. </p>
<p>On Tuesday OPEC agreed to <a href="http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/News/International__Business/OPEC_agrees_on_output_increase_by_500000_barrels/articleshow/2361393.cms">increase production by 500,000 barrels per day</a> after production-increase advocates, including Saudi Arabia, successfully argued that continued elevated oil prices are likely to reduce global GDP growth. (Those elevated oil prices have already reduced U.S. GDP by one percentage point or more, depending on model projections.)</p>
<p>However, even more disconcerting for economists, analysts and consumers alike is the secular, long-term trend regarding oil: namely, that both OPEC and non-OPEC sources combined are unable to keep pace with rising demand. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/12/up-ahead-conservation-or-100-barrel-oil/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Up ahead: Conservation or $100 / barrel oil?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/12/up-ahead-conservation-or-100-barrel-oil/">Up ahead: Conservation or $100 / barrel oil?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 12 Sep 2007 15:47:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/News/International__Business/OPEC_agrees_on_output_increase_by_500000_barrels/articleshow/2361393.cms>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/12/up-ahead-conservation-or-100-barrel-oil/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/987898/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/12/up-ahead-conservation-or-100-barrel-oil/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>alternative energies</category><category>AlternativeEnergies</category><category>conservation</category><category>inthenews</category><category>oil consumption</category><category>OilConsumption</category><category>OPEC</category><category>supply crunch</category><category>SupplyCrunch</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 15:47:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
