<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Chasing Value: New Years Quick Takes]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/29/chasing-value-new-years-quick-takes/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/29/chasing-value-new-years-quick-takes/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/29/chasing-value-new-years-quick-takes/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xom/" rel="tag">Exxon Mobil (XOM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/t/" rel="tag">AT and T (T)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cvx/" rel="tag">Chevron Corp (CVX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cop/" rel="tag">ConocoPhillips (COP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/fdx/" rel="tag">FedEx Corp (FDX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/vz/" rel="tag">Verizon Communications (VZ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ups/" rel="tag">United Parcel'B' (UPS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ptr/" rel="tag">PetroChina Co Ltd ADR (PTR)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/chasing-value/" rel="tag">Chasing Value[TM]</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aauky/" rel="tag">Anglo American (AAUKY)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rds-a/" rel="tag">Royal Dutch Shell (RDS.A)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tef/" rel="tag">Telefonica SA (TEF)</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/verizon-logo-black-240.jpg" />Can you hear me now? Well listen closely, Verizon Communications (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/verizon-communications-inc/vz/nys">VZ</a>) is going to get a bounce from the Apple Inc. (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>) iPhone in 2011. Nothing you don't already know. Is there a more sure thing in the coming year? Long term it will fade some, but in 2011 the pent up demand has to have a positive impact.<br />
<br />
<strong>Communications:</strong> The telephone companies everywhere are going to have a good year. Verizon is a great stock for Roth IRA's, paying a 5.41% yield. The dilution of the iPhone market may hurt AT&amp;T, Inc. (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/atandt-inc/t/nys">T</a>) some, as VZ is helped, but it too is a good long term hold and pays an even higher yield at 5.76%.<br />
<br />
If you want to diversify internationally there are multiple good choices and they pay even higher yields.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/29/chasing-value-new-years-quick-takes/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Chasing Value: New Years Quick Takes</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/29/chasing-value-new-years-quick-takes/">Chasing Value: New Years Quick Takes</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 29 Dec 2010 16:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/29/chasing-value-new-years-quick-takes/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19780507/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/29/chasing-value-new-years-quick-takes/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>AAUKY</category><category>Apple Inc.</category><category>BCE</category><category>ChasingValue</category><category>COP</category><category>CVX</category><category>FDX</category><category>featured</category><category>iPhone</category><category>oil speculation</category><category>presidential campaign</category><category>PTR</category><category>RDS.A</category><category>Sarah Palin</category><category>SYY</category><category>T</category><category>TEF</category><category>tina fey</category><category>TLSYY</category><category>UPS</category><category>VZ</category><category>XOM</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 16:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Speculation accounts for 81% of oil trading volume]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/21/speculation-accounts-for-81-of-oil-trading-volume/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/21/speculation-accounts-for-81-of-oil-trading-volume/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/21/speculation-accounts-for-81-of-oil-trading-volume/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/politics/" rel="tag">Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/oil-pit.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" />Upset about paying $3.80 a gallon for gasoline? Hank Paulson, former <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys"><strong><font color="#888888">Goldman Sachs Group</font></strong></a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys"><font color="#888888">GS</font></a>) CEO, argued that it was all <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/02/business/02oil.html">supply and demand</a> so quit your bellyaching. I thought speculation was playing a big part -- traders who bought oil and sold the dollar to drive up the price. Indeed, a few months agao I found a source who thinks <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/12/oil-supply-to-grow-more-than-demand-so-why-is-gas-at-a-record-hi/">60%</a> of the volume was from speculators.</p>
<p>Seems even that was too low an estimate. <em><a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26321642/">The Washington Post</a></em> reported Wednesday that the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has analyzed the books of oil traders and calculated that <strong><em><u>81% of oil trading volume was conducted by speculators</u></em></strong>. <br /></p>
<p>Guess who broke open the opportunity for oil speculators to trade oil in a loosely regulated fashion? Goldman. The <em>Post </em>reports that In 1991, its J. Aron unit argued that "it should be granted the same exemption given to commercial traders because its business of buying commodities on behalf of investors was similar to the middlemen who broker commodity transactions for commercial firms."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/21/speculation-accounts-for-81-of-oil-trading-volume/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Speculation accounts for 81% of oil trading volume</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/21/speculation-accounts-for-81-of-oil-trading-volume/">Speculation accounts for 81% of oil trading volume</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 21 Aug 2008 08:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/21/speculation-accounts-for-81-of-oil-trading-volume/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1290832/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/21/speculation-accounts-for-81-of-oil-trading-volume/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cftc</category><category>commodities futures trading commission</category><category>CommoditiesFuturesTradingCommission</category><category>featured</category><category>goldman sachs</category><category>goldman sachs group</category><category>GoldmanSachs</category><category>GoldmanSachsGroup</category><category>gs</category><category>hank paulson</category><category>HankPaulson</category><category>inthenews</category><category>oil prices</category><category>oil production</category><category>oil shock</category><category>oil speculation</category><category>oil stocks</category><category>OilPrices</category><category>OilProduction</category><category>OilShock</category><category>OilSpeculation</category><category>OilStocks</category><category>vital</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 08:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[$39.5 billion ExxonMobil profits: no big deal]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/07/39-5-billion-exxonmobil-profits-no-big-deal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/07/39-5-billion-exxonmobil-profits-no-big-deal/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/07/39-5-billion-exxonmobil-profits-no-big-deal/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xom/" rel="tag">Exxon Mobil (XOM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cvx/" rel="tag">Chevron Corp (CVX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cop/" rel="tag">ConocoPhillips (COP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bp/" rel="tag">BP p.l.c. ADS (BP)</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/10/filling_the_tank.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />ExxonMobil Corporation (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/exxon-mobil-corporation/xom/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">XOM</a>) made headlines reporting an annual profit of $39.5 billion. So what?!</p>
<p>So what if a company capitalized at $440 billion earns less than 10% profit. Suppose you bought the entire company "lock, stock and barrel"; wouldn't you expect to make far greater than that? You would be taking on a massive amount of responsibility and risk! Currency risk, political risk (<em>you </em>go deal with Putin in Russia and Chavez in Venezuela, or worse in Iraq or Iran or Africa), workman's comp for oil derricks in the Gulf Coast and elsewhere, environmental risk, government regulation -- the list is endless.</p>
<p>When I invest, my anticipation is <em>at least </em>a 10% return. Who in the entire investment world would do this, unless of course you were buying bonds paying 5% to 7% without any work. The 70-year stock market average is about 10%. </p>
<p>There is nothing wrong with Exxon Mobil's profit, given its size. It would be sad if they could not make 10%, and consider that they only made this with very high oil prices! If the profits were so high and prospects so good, why isn't there a run on the stock? <br /></p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/07/39-5-billion-exxonmobil-profits-no-big-deal/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>$39.5 billion ExxonMobil profits: no big deal</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/07/39-5-billion-exxonmobil-profits-no-big-deal/">$39.5 billion ExxonMobil profits: no big deal</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 07 Feb 2007 17:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/07/39-5-billion-exxonmobil-profits-no-big-deal/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/749968/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/02/07/39-5-billion-exxonmobil-profits-no-big-deal/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Commodity prices</category><category>CommodityPrices</category><category>Energy Prices</category><category>EnergyPrices</category><category>exxon</category><category>Exxon Mobil (XOM)</category><category>exxonmobil</category><category>ExxonMobil(xom)</category><category>Gas prices</category><category>GasPrices</category><category>mobil</category><category>Oil Prices</category><category>Oil Speculation</category><category>OilPrices</category><category>OilSpeculation</category><category>Profits</category><category>Sheldon Liber</category><category>SheldonLiber</category><category>xom</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 17:35:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
