<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Does Google need an ombudsman?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/06/does-google-need-an-ombudsman/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/06/does-google-need-an-ombudsman/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/06/does-google-need-an-ombudsman/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a></p>Could Google benefit by having an ombudsman/customer service department/mediator-arbitrator? Possibly -- and it's clear that as the power of the Internet juggernaut continues to grow, the more it will need a very public face to put out all the fires that are sure to be started in the near future. Make no mistake -- history has shown this to always happen.<br /><br />This <a href="http://googlewatch.eweek.com/blogs/google_watch/archive/2006/07/06/11241.aspx">article over at eWeek</a> makes a very good point about Google needing an ombudsman. From being a fire extinguisher for potential lawsuits to highlighting legit customer concerns, an ombudsman could help make Google's "do no evil" mantra a reality.<br /><br />With more <a href="http://goog.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/05/google-fends-off-lawsuit-over-page-rank-feature/">smaller businesses almost solely relying on Google</a> as a revenue source (to me, that's a mistake), there are literally millions of feathers that will continue to be ruffled as Google constantly tweaks its search process. Plus, consider the&nbsp;<a href="http://goog.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/05/new-report-click-fraud-worsening/">growing threat of massive click fraud</a> issues and it's easy to see why Google needs a "champion of issues." If you hold GOOG, this is an area you should be asking the Mountain View boys about -- and soon.<br /><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/06/does-google-need-an-ombudsman/">Does Google need an ombudsman?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 06 Jul 2006 15:23:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://googlewatch.eweek.com/blogs/google_watch/archive/2006/07/06/11241.aspx>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/06/does-google-need-an-ombudsman/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/640117/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/06/does-google-need-an-ombudsman/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AdSense</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>ombudsman</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2006 15:23:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
