<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft to unload Razorfish, Publicis looking?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/29/microsoft-to-unload-razorfish-publicis-looking/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/29/microsoft-to-unload-razorfish-publicis-looking/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/29/microsoft-to-unload-razorfish-publicis-looking/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ms/" rel="tag">Morgan Stanley (MS)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/msft.jpg" /><a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) has engaged investment bank <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/morgan-stanley/ms/nys">Morgan Stanley</a> (NYSE: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/morgan-stanley/ms/nys">MS</a>) to help it <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/11be3c0e-641f-11de-a818-00144feabdc0.html?nclick_check=1">unload digital agency Razorfish</a>. <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/publicis-groupe-sa/pgpef/nao">Publicis</a> (OTC: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/publicis-groupe-sa/pgpef/nao">PGPEF</a>) is looking for targets in the online ad space and could be a possible bidder. </p>
<p>Razorfish has been valued at $600 million to $700 million, based on a top line of approximately $400 million for its last fiscal year and peer margins of 12% to 13%. The company boasts 2,000 employees and clients that include Audi, <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nike-inc-cl-b/nke/nys">Nike</a> (NYSE: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nike-inc-cl-b/nke/nys">NKE</a>) and <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/kraft-foods-inc/kft/nys">Kraft</a> (NYSE: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/kraft-foods-inc/kft/nys">KFT</a>). Microsoft bought the company as part of a $6 billion deal to acquire aQuantive. At the time, Razorfish was known as Avenue A Razorfish, as the result of a merger sealed in the wasteland known as the "dotcom bust."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/29/microsoft-to-unload-razorfish-publicis-looking/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Microsoft to unload Razorfish, Publicis looking?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/29/microsoft-to-unload-razorfish-publicis-looking/">Microsoft to unload Razorfish, Publicis looking?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 29 Jun 2009 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/11be3c0e-641f-11de-a818-00144feabdc0.html?nclick_check=1>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/29/microsoft-to-unload-razorfish-publicis-looking/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19081189/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/29/microsoft-to-unload-razorfish-publicis-looking/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><category>kft</category><category>microsoft</category><category>morgan stanley</category><category>MorganStanley</category><category>ms</category><category>msft</category><category>nke</category><category>omnicom</category><category>omnicomgroup</category><category>publicis</category><category>publicisgroup</category><category>razorfish</category><category>wpp</category><category>wpp group</category><category>WppGroup</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[What Wal-Mart did to turn off an ad agency hopeful]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/15/what-wal-mart-did-to-turn-off-an-ad-agency-hopeful/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/15/what-wal-mart-did-to-turn-off-an-ad-agency-hopeful/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/15/what-wal-mart-did-to-turn-off-an-ad-agency-hopeful/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/12/walmart_logo.jpg" />Just a week after Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (NYSE:WMT) got rid of two of its advertising executives and <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/08/wal-mart-dismisses-ad-firm-that-it-just-hired-recently/">fired</a> its new ad agency, DraftFCB, the company is about to give four of the five finalists from its last ad agency review another shot at winning the $580 million account. Are the four players ready, or miffed from last time -- or both?<br /><br />This is no small potatoes. Wal-Mart's ad budget is pretty large and should get a pretty decent share of attention from all those involved in the new review slated to happen in February. In a major rebuff, though, one of the agencies that participated last time <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/15/business/media/15adco.html?_r=2&amp;adxnnl=1&amp;ref=business&amp;adxnnlx=1166191272-Zfy2obHfxBnAzQvp+BLqVg&amp;oref=slogin&amp;oref=slogin">has left Wal-Mart's invitation out to dry</a> by saying <em>thanks, but no thanks</em>.<br /><br /> GSD&amp;M in Austin, Texas -- part of the Omnicom Group which has created campaigns for Wal-Mart since 1987 -- basically said it did not want to compete for Wal-Mart's business again. Red flags, as a result, went off everywhere. Why not?<br /><br />The head of GSD&amp;M said that "We helped build Wal-Mart from $11 billion in sales to $312 billion. [...] We declare victory, and we are moving on." That may be true, but it sounds a bit fishy to me. A major ad agency <em>not</em> going after business like this? Makes one wonder...<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/15/what-wal-mart-did-to-turn-off-an-ad-agency-hopeful/">What Wal-Mart did to turn off an ad agency hopeful</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 15 Dec 2006 09:43:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/15/business/media/15adco.html?_r=1&amp;adxnnl=1&amp;ref=business&amp;adxnnlx=1166191272-Zfy2obHfxBnAzQvp+BLqVg&amp;oref=slogin>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/15/what-wal-mart-did-to-turn-off-an-ad-agency-hopeful/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/719305/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/15/what-wal-mart-did-to-turn-off-an-ad-agency-hopeful/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>DraftFDB</category><category>Julie Roehm</category><category>JulieRoehm</category><category>Omnicom Group</category><category>OmnicomGroup</category><category>Wal-Mart</category><category>Wal-Mart Stores</category><category>Wal-martStores</category><category>WMT</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 09:43:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
