
Half of the fun for Apple users comes at times like this. With a month to go before the
World Wide Developers Conference (referred to as WWDC) where Apple often announces some new products, rumors about what will be revealed by Steve Jobs on the stage are running rampant.
Apple sites and blogs will speculate on what might come out, dream about what they want to come out and list the details, even Photoshop up possible models to pass around or fake others out with. It's an entire ecosphere of excitement, and often in the middle of it some of these rumor sites will break a real tip from an Apple employee about an upcoming product.
In the most recent case it was a leak about music-media related product Apple still has yet to release (an 'iPod-killer' killer?). Apple made the case that online bloggers and website owners were not real journalists, and therefore did not have any legal protection in refusing to give up their sources. However a panel of judges recently affirmed that online journalists were still journalists and had that protection. Apple was not able to grab the offending email from the servers of two sites that got the information. As a result of the decision
Apple decided not to pursue the matter any more.
This was first of all a landmark case for online journalism, as it sets the precedent for online reporters to have some of the same protection that their print counterparts have.