<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Two Microsoft Concerns That Could Deflate Our Enthusiasm]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/02/two-microsoft-concerns-that-could-deflate-our-enthusiasm/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/02/two-microsoft-concerns-that-could-deflate-our-enthusiasm/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/02/two-microsoft-concerns-that-could-deflate-our-enthusiasm/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/01/1msft.jpg"  alt="Microsoft (MSFT)" />Microsoft (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas" class="inlinked" injectedlink="">MSFT</a>) dominates the markets in which it competes. Microsoft dominates the operating system markets where Windows has 75% of the PC market share. It also dominates he business productivity market where Office has 95% share by our estimates. <br />
<br />
Microsoft competes with Apple (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas" class="inlinked" injectedlink="">AAPL</a>) and open source players like Red Hat (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/red-hat-inc/rht/nys" class="inlinked" injectedlink="">RHT</a>) and Novell (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/novell-inc/novl/nas" class="inlinked" injectedlink="">NOVL</a>) that support Linux distributions in operating systems, and with Google's (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas" class="inlinked" injectedlink="">GOOG</a>) Apps suite of products, Adobe (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/adobe-systems-incorporated/adbe/nas" class="inlinked" injectedlink="">ADBE</a>), IBM (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/international-business-machines-corporation/ibm/nys" class="inlinked">IBM</a>) and Oracle (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/oracle-corporation/orcl/nas" class="inlinked" injectedlink="">ORCL</a>) in business productivity.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/02/two-microsoft-concerns-that-could-deflate-our-enthusiasm/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Two Microsoft Concerns That Could Deflate Our Enthusiasm</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/02/two-microsoft-concerns-that-could-deflate-our-enthusiasm/">Two Microsoft Concerns That Could Deflate Our Enthusiasm</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 02 Mar 2011 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/02/two-microsoft-concerns-that-could-deflate-our-enthusiasm/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19864732/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/03/02/two-microsoft-concerns-that-could-deflate-our-enthusiasm/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>microsoft</category><category>office</category><category>operating system</category><category>windows</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trefis]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google's Chrome OS to Challenge Microsoft's Dominance]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/08/google-chrome-os-to-challenge-microsofts-dominance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/08/google-chrome-os-to-challenge-microsofts-dominance/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/08/google-chrome-os-to-challenge-microsofts-dominance/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/launches/" rel="tag">Launches</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/12/google-chrome-os-logo.jpg" alt="Google Chrome OS" />A <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/1b38a448-0263-11e0-ac33-00144feabdc0.html#axzz17XDBe7lC"><em>Financial Times</em></a> article reported that next year Google (<a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) plans to introduce its new operating system called Chrome OS. Google's new Chrome laptop will feature an operating system based on the computing power of the Web, rather than running "native" software made by Microsoft.</p>
<p>Eric Schmidt, Google's chief executive, called the new system: "A viable third choice in real operating systems to stand alongside Microsoft (<a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) and Apple (<a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>) and a culmination of a vision he has worked on since 1983."</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/08/google-chrome-os-to-challenge-microsofts-dominance/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Google's Chrome OS to Challenge Microsoft's Dominance</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/08/google-chrome-os-to-challenge-microsofts-dominance/">Google's Chrome OS to Challenge Microsoft's Dominance</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 08 Dec 2010 12:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/08/google-chrome-os-to-challenge-microsofts-dominance/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19751778/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/08/google-chrome-os-to-challenge-microsofts-dominance/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>Apple</category><category>Chrome laptop</category><category>Chrome OS</category><category>Chrome OS laptop</category><category>Eric Schmidt</category><category>featured</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>Google Chrome OS</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>operating system</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie Madon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 12:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple's Macs aren't safe from phishing attacks]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/apples-macs-arent-safe-from-phishing-attacks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/apples-macs-arent-safe-from-phishing-attacks/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/apples-macs-arent-safe-from-phishing-attacks/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/20070807161909990002.jpg" alt="" />Once upon a time, Mac users could brag they were much safer from malicious electronic attacks. After all, in the days before Google (<a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>), when Microsoft (<a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) was the only uber-player in town, Windows was the perpetual malware target. Phishers, however, aren't discriminating; they're just looking for an account to plunge. So, both Apple (<a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>) and Microsoft users are threatened. Virus writers do tend to focus on the Windows operating system, which owns 90% of the OS market, <a target="_blank" href="http://blogs.usatoday.com/technologylive/2009/11/mac-phishing-attacks.html">but phishers are platform independent</a>.</p>
<p>Phishing involves attempts to get a user to reveal information about their accounts. Once the soon-to-be victim clicks that link or fills out a form, the "transaction" is complete -- no operating system interaction necessary. As a result, there really isn't any advantage to using a Mac over a PC.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/apples-macs-arent-safe-from-phishing-attacks/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Apple's Macs aren't safe from phishing attacks</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/apples-macs-arent-safe-from-phishing-attacks/">Apple's Macs aren't safe from phishing attacks</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 18 Nov 2009 10:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://blogs.usatoday.com/technologylive/2009/11/mac-phishing-attacks.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/apples-macs-arent-safe-from-phishing-attacks/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19244257/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/18/apples-macs-arent-safe-from-phishing-attacks/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>eset</category><category>facebook</category><category>featured</category><category>gmail</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>hotmail</category><category>linkedin</category><category>linux</category><category>mac</category><category>malware</category><category>microsoft</category><category>msft</category><category>myspace</category><category>news corp</category><category>NewsCorp</category><category>nws</category><category>operating system</category><category>OperatingSystem</category><category>phishing</category><category>social media</category><category>SocialMedia</category><category>solaris</category><category>twitter</category><category>windows</category><category>yahoo</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 10:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Market sells Microsoft on Q4 news -- warranted or not?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/23/market-sells-microsoft-on-q4-news-warranted-or-not/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/23/market-sells-microsoft-on-q4-news-warranted-or-not/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/23/market-sells-microsoft-on-q4-news-warranted-or-not/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ibm/" rel="tag">International Business Machines (IBM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/04/microsoft_logo.jpg" alt="" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft Corporation</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>), a company in the same competitive league as <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">Apple, Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google, INc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo!</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>), and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/international-business-machines-corporation/ibm/nys">International Business Machines Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/international-business-machines-corporation/ibm/nys">IBM</a>), posted its <a href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/microsoft-reports-fourth-quarter-results/rfid234874937?channel=pf">Q4 earnings release</a> after the bell on Thursday. As I was writing this paragraph, shares of the software giant were trading down over 6% in the after-hours session. Looks like the market was disappointed.</p>
<p>To be certain, the results weren't great (of course, no one was expecting them to recall the company's growth story of yesteryear, I'm confident about that, let me tell you). Sales were down 17%. Operating income on a dollar basis dropped 30%. And, on a reported basis, Microsoft's per-share profit, calculated out to be 34 cents, declined 26%. On an adjusted basis, adding back 4 cents for a few items, earnings came in at 38 cents per share. According to my <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/22/is-microsoft-a-trade-before-its-q4-release/">earnings preview</a>, that beat estimates by two pennies. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/23/market-sells-microsoft-on-q4-news-warranted-or-not/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Market sells Microsoft on Q4 news -- warranted or not?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/23/market-sells-microsoft-on-q4-news-warranted-or-not/">Market sells Microsoft on Q4 news -- warranted or not?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 23 Jul 2009 18:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/microsoft-reports-fourth-quarter-results/rfid234874937?channel=pf>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/23/market-sells-microsoft-on-q4-news-warranted-or-not/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19107955/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/23/market-sells-microsoft-on-q4-news-warranted-or-not/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>Apple</category><category>Bing</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>IBM</category><category>international business machines</category><category>InternationalBusinessMachines</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>operating system</category><category>OperatingSystem</category><category>search</category><category>software</category><category>tech stocks</category><category>TechStocks</category><category>Windows</category><category>Xbox 360</category><category>Xbox360</category><category>Yahoo</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 18:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google to launch alternative to Windows]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/08/google-to-launch-alternative-to-windows/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/08/google-to-launch-alternative-to-windows/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/08/google-to-launch-alternative-to-windows/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/google-goog.jpg" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">Google</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>), which already has most of the money in the world, seems intent on grabbing <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a>'s (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) pile by elbowing its way into the operating system business. </p>
<p>Last year Google introduced its own web browser, Chrome, and a platform for smart phones, Android. Now the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124702911173210237.html?mod=djmr_octuse6npurl6"><em>Wall Street Journal</em></a> (subscription required) reports that by the end of next year it will roll out an operating system to compete with Windows.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/08/google-to-launch-alternative-to-windows/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Google to launch alternative to Windows</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/08/google-to-launch-alternative-to-windows/">Google to launch alternative to Windows</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 08 Jul 2009 12:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/08/google-to-launch-alternative-to-windows/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19090243/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/07/08/google-to-launch-alternative-to-windows/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>android</category><category>chrome</category><category>featured</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>MSFT</category><category>operating system</category><category>windows</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Barlow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 12:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The return of Windows XP]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/21/the-return-of-windows-xp/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/21/the-return-of-windows-xp/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/21/the-return-of-windows-xp/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img alt="Netbook with XP" align="right" src="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/images/images345x345/616523.jpg" width="220" height="220" />It's only a stopgap measure, everyone knows. It's a temporary reprieve for XP. Just the same, netbooks are allowing XP, the operating system Microsoft tore from its loyal public last year, to make a comeback. </p>
<p>Last year I tried to get a new computer but was so badly <a href="http://www.walletpop.com/blog/2008/05/30/how-i-spent-my-rebate-check-getting-tortured-by-vista/">abused by Vista</a> I took it back and reformatted my old computer so I could avoid the demanding operating system.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/21/the-return-of-windows-xp/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The return of Windows XP</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/21/the-return-of-windows-xp/">The return of Windows XP</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 21 Jun 2009 13:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/21/the-return-of-windows-xp/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1555900/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/06/21/the-return-of-windows-xp/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Asus</category><category>Brian White</category><category>computer</category><category>inthenews</category><category>laptop</category><category>microsoft</category><category>netbook</category><category>operating system</category><category>vista</category><category>windows 7</category><category>xp</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Carol Vinzant]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 13:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Dell keeps backdoor to XP open -- for a fee]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/19/dell-keeps-backdoor-to-xp-open-for-a-fee/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/19/dell-keeps-backdoor-to-xp-open-for-a-fee/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/19/dell-keeps-backdoor-to-xp-open-for-a-fee/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dell/" rel="tag">Dell (DELL)</a></p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dell-inc/dell/nas">Dell</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dell-inc/dell/nas">DELL</a>) seems to be positioning itself as the de facto corporate champion of saving XP and saving its customers from <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a>'s (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>) much-maligned Vista operating system. Dell announced it would charge $20 to $50 extra to some customers to "downgrade" to Windows XP. Dell even puts the "downgrade" in quotes, the idea is so ridiculous. In reality the fee is more like $100-150 because many customers will have to upgrade their version of Vista to downgrade to XP.<br /><br />On the surface, this extra charge may sound like bad news, that getting XP is going to be even more difficult. But I see this as a way for Dell to ensure there is still some legitimate way to keep getting XP even after June 30, when Microsoft wants to kill it off.<br /><br />There's been much speculation about whether Microsoft would relent and postpone the demise of XP another time. I also take this news to mean that it will not. Time's up. In some ways the deadline was just moved up to June 18--that's when Dell <a href="http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;articleId=9099178">stopped pre-installing XP</a>.<br /><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/19/dell-keeps-backdoor-to-xp-open-for-a-fee/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Dell keeps backdoor to XP open -- for a fee</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/19/dell-keeps-backdoor-to-xp-open-for-a-fee/">Dell keeps backdoor to XP open -- for a fee</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 19 Jun 2008 15:51:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/19/dell-keeps-backdoor-to-xp-open-for-a-fee/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1230520/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/19/dell-keeps-backdoor-to-xp-open-for-a-fee/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>operating system</category><category>OperatingSystem</category><category>vista</category><category>xp</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Carol Vinzant]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 15:51:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Developers shun Vista, too]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/16/developers-shun-vista-too/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/16/developers-shun-vista-too/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/16/developers-shun-vista-too/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p>A <a href="http://www.evansdata.com/press/viewRelease.php?pressID=135">recent study</a> by Evans Data Corporation shows that developers don't like Vista any more than the rest of us. Six times as many are clinging to XP than switching to Vista. Only 8% of developers are working on programs to run on Vista, compared with 50% who are writing for Windows XP. That's not good news for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>), who hopes that its customers will grudgingly tolerate the withdrawal of XP on June 30.<br /><br />Many are <a href="http://weblog.infoworld.com/save-xp/">begging Microsoft</a> to relent, especially InfoWorld. The developers do plan on doing more work for the troubled operating system next year, but still not as many as are hanging onto XP. Next year, 24% of developers expect to target Vista while 29% will still work with XP.<br /><br />Evans data doesn't say how much the Vista disaster has helped Linux and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">Apple</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>), but it's clear Vista has sent many fleeing. <a href="http://blogs.eweek.com/applewatch/content/channel/macs_defy_windows-gravity.html">eWeek reported last week</a> that Apple now has a 14% market share -- nearly four times <a href="http://www.macrumors.com/2006/06/01/mac-market-share-update/">what it had in 2005</a>. Using data from NPD Group, eWeek points out that Apple sells two out of three computers in the $1,000 and above category. That's largely because Macs are still way, way more expensive than PCs. If Apple ever got around to offering a computer at a price the masses were willing to pay, Microsoft might be in trouble. Microsoft may not hear the complaints about its operating system, but it <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/idg/IDG_852573C4006938800025743300746392.html?ref=technology">understands that people want to pay less for computers</a>.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/16/developers-shun-vista-too/">Developers shun Vista, too</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.evansdata.com/press/viewRelease.php?pressID=135>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/16/developers-shun-vista-too/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1226835/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/16/developers-shun-vista-too/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aapl</category><category>linux</category><category>microsoft</category><category>msft</category><category>operating system</category><category>OperatingSystem</category><category>vista</category><category>xp</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Carol Vinzant]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:28:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Apple's new Leopard operating system for sale October 26]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/17/apples-new-leopard-operating-system-sells-october-26/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/17/apples-new-leopard-operating-system-sells-october-26/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/17/apples-new-leopard-operating-system-sells-october-26/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/launches/" rel="tag">Launches</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/newmacs.jpg" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">Apple</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>)'s newest Macintosh operating system -- Leopard -- will officially go on sale October 26 (just under two weeks from today). Unlike <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">Microsoft</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas">MSFT</a>), Apple releases new operating systems every year to two years. By contrast, the time difference between the release of Microsoft's Windows XP and Windows Vista operating systems was over five years.<br /><br />That being said, so Mac users flock to upgrade every time a new operating system comes out? Hard to say, but every Apple fan I know borders on zealot (this is not a bad thing), and they do indeed upgrade every time something new comes out. I sense in many cases this is nothing more than psychological pride over genuine utility addition, but I could be mistaken.<br /><br />Will Leopard's release bode well for Apple's coffers, then? Sure, but the question of how much is still up for debate. Apple's iPod phenomenon -- and now, iPhone phenomenon -- has translated into a growing market share for Apple PCs, and this "halo effect" has been tracked and followed with journalistic vigor in every nook and cranny of the media and blogosphere. What more could yet another upgrade add to this honey pot?<br /><br />Apple's shares are sitting at an all-time high at the moment due to the perfectly-timed release of new iPods in September, along with the growing market for the revolutionary (yet already outdated in many ways) iPhone. Adding new eye candy to Apple's PC market will do nothing but help bump the company's stock price to over $200 if holiday sell-through does well. Perhaps the iPod was just a <a href="http://www.thestreet.com/s/apple-sets-leopard-launch/newsanalysis/techhardware/10384652.html?puc=googlefi">means to get customers flocking to Apple's PC segment</a>, since in the long term, the iPod's remarkable sales sustainability can't keep up the torrid pace it has in the past -- or can it? Regardless, the company wants customers buying new PCs to think "Mac" instead of "Windows," and a newer version that looks and feels better than the last will only help that effort.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/17/apples-new-leopard-operating-system-sells-october-26/">Apple's new Leopard operating system for sale October 26</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 17 Oct 2007 12:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.thestreet.com/s/apple-sets-leopard-launch/newsanalysis/techhardware/10384652.html?puc=googlefi>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/17/apples-new-leopard-operating-system-sells-october-26/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1015260/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/17/apples-new-leopard-operating-system-sells-october-26/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>Apple</category><category>Apple, Inc.</category><category>Apple,Inc.</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Leopard</category><category>Mac Leopard</category><category>MacLeopard</category><category>MacOS</category><category>operating system</category><category>OperatingSystem</category><category>OS X</category><category>OsX</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 12:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[More speculation on Apple's broad long term strategy]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/01/more-speculation-on-apples-broad-long-term-strategy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/01/more-speculation-on-apples-broad-long-term-strategy/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/01/more-speculation-on-apples-broad-long-term-strategy/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rumors/" rel="tag">Rumors</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a></p><p>Perhaps, there is no purer form of&nbsp;risk taking&nbsp;than&nbsp;knowledgeably predicting&nbsp;unexpectedfuture&nbsp;actions of companies&nbsp;within a dynamic business arena&nbsp;and then taking equity&nbsp;positions inpart based on&nbsp;such speculations. And perhaps,&nbsp;there&nbsp;is no more&nbsp;dynamic speculative&nbsp;arena thanthe&nbsp;technology space where fundamental attributes&nbsp;shift gears as swiftly as&nbsp;tail back&nbsp;<ahref="http://sports.aol.com/news/articles/_a/bush-mania-enveloping-new-orleans/n20060501021109990001">ReggieBush</a>.<img style="WIDTH: 125px; HEIGHT: 188px" height="188" alt="" hspace="4"src="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/05/about_bob[1].jpg" width="125" align="right" vspace="4" /></p>
<p>A week ago, I <a href="http://aapl.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/24/what-apple-really-wants-with-windows/">blogged</a>on Cringley's entry&nbsp;detailing where Apple Computer may be heading in terms of its utilization of Windows XPapplications sans the need for&nbsp;Microsoft's&nbsp;operating system itself. As you might recall, Cringley provideswonderfully insightful&nbsp;musings on possible future initiatives&nbsp;that are as&nbsp;provocative as theyare&nbsp;based on a&nbsp;deep understanding of the history and current landscape of the&nbsp;field.</p>
<p>In&nbsp;a <a href="http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/pulpit20060427.html">recent update to his blog</a>, Cringelyagain&nbsp;proposes some seemingly wild predictions while backing&nbsp;his reasoning&nbsp;upwith&nbsp;rich&nbsp;attention to specific details&nbsp;across a variety of software&nbsp;firms. </p>
<p>Specifically, Cringely offers&nbsp;a version of the&nbsp;future&nbsp;in which Apple&nbsp;buys Adobe as anintegral&nbsp;part of&nbsp;a broader&nbsp;strategy to take on&nbsp;the Microsoft&nbsp;operating system andapplications&nbsp;dynasties. Along the way, he takes the reader on an expansive journey which compares&nbsp;currentcompetition between Apple and Microsoft to the early 90's&nbsp;challenges between IBM and Microsoft, lays out Apple'spossible long time preparations for such a&nbsp;run&nbsp;for OS dominance and&nbsp;characterizes Microsoft as"bloated and paralyzed."</p>
<p>What more&nbsp;could you want from a soothsayer?</p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/01/more-speculation-on-apples-broad-long-term-strategy/">More speculation on Apple's broad long term strategy</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 01 May 2006 12:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/pulpit20060427.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/01/more-speculation-on-apples-broad-long-term-strategy/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/613620/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/01/more-speculation-on-apples-broad-long-term-strategy/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Adobe</category><category>Apple</category><category>Cringely</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>Operating System</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Philip Pearlman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 12:30:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
