<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Options Update: Weight Watchers Volatility Elevated, Shares at 33-Month High]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/12/options-update-weight-watchers-volatility-elevated-shares-at-3/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/12/options-update-weight-watchers-volatility-elevated-shares-at-3/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/12/options-update-weight-watchers-volatility-elevated-shares-at-3/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/12/flywall_final_logo_mini.gif" alt="" />Weight Watchers (<a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/weight-watchers-international-inc/wtw/nys">WTW</a>) overall option implied volatility is at 34, according to Track Data, above its 26-week average of 27 into its release of Q4 results on February 17. WTW rallied 2.5% after Jennifer Hudson appeared on Oprah Winfrey's show to discuss her weight loss using Weight Watchers' system. </p>
<p>Russell 2000 (<a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/ishares-trust-russell-2000-index-fund/iwm/nys">IWM</a>) overall implied volatility at 23; the 26-week average is 26.</p>
<p>Financial Select Sector (<a class="inlinked" href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/select-sector-spdr-amex-financial-sel-index/xlf/nys">XLF</a>) overall volatility at 22; the 26-week average is 25.</p>
<p><em>Options Update is by Stock Specialist Paul Foster of </em><a href="http://theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?action=main&amp;arg=A"><em>theflyonthewall.com</em></a>.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/12/options-update-weight-watchers-volatility-elevated-shares-at-3/">Options Update: Weight Watchers Volatility Elevated, Shares at 33-Month High</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 12 Feb 2011 08:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/12/options-update-weight-watchers-volatility-elevated-shares-at-3/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19840970/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2011/02/12/options-update-weight-watchers-volatility-elevated-shares-at-3/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>inthenews</category><category>IWM</category><category>Jennifer Hudson</category><category>Oprah Winfrey</category><category>options</category><category>overall implied volatility</category><category>Russell 2000</category><category>Weight Watchers</category><category>WTW</category><category>XLF</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Foster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 12 Feb 2011 08:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Options Update: Discovery Communications Volatility Low into Launch of Oprah Winfrey Network]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/30/options-update-discovery-communications-volatility-low-into-lau/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/30/options-update-discovery-communications-volatility-low-into-lau/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/30/options-update-discovery-communications-volatility-low-into-lau/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/options/" rel="tag">Options</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/03/aol-fly-logo.gif" />Discovery Communications, Inc. (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/discovery-communications-inc-series-a-common-stock/disca/nas" class="inlinked">DISCA</a>) closed at $41.80. OWN: The Oprah Winfrey Network, a joint venture between Oprah Winfrey's production company, Harpo, and cable programmer Discovery Communications, is slated to launch on January 1. Overall option implied volatility of 26 is below its 26-week average of 29 according to Track Data, suggesting decreasing price movement. </p>
<p>MSCI Emerging Markets Index (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/ishares-trust-msci-emerging-markets-index/eem/nys" class="inlinked">EEM</a>) overall option implied volatility of 24 is below its 26-week average of 27 according to Track Data, suggesting decreasing price movement. </p>
<p><em>Options Update is by Stock Specialist Paul Foster of theflyonthewall.com</em>.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/30/options-update-discovery-communications-volatility-low-into-lau/">Options Update: Discovery Communications Volatility Low into Launch of Oprah Winfrey Network</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 30 Dec 2010 17:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/30/options-update-discovery-communications-volatility-low-into-lau/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19782181/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/12/30/options-update-discovery-communications-volatility-low-into-lau/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>DISCA</category><category>discovery communications</category><category>EEM</category><category>inthenews</category><category>oprah winfrey</category><category>oprah winfrey network</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Foster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2010 17:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs Looking at an Image Makeover?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/22/goldman-sachs-looking-at-an-image-makeover/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/22/goldman-sachs-looking-at-an-image-makeover/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/22/goldman-sachs-looking-at-an-image-makeover/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a></p><em><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/goldman-sachs-logo-240.jpg" />The Wall Street Journal</em> has been all over Goldman Sachs (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys" target="_blank">GS</a>) during the past couple of days. First the firm was <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704895204575320873417658124.html?mod=rss_whats_news_us" target="_blank">given an extension</a> to respond to the SEC's lawsuit involving disclosures concerning a collaterlized debt obligation related to subprime mortgages. The previous deadline for a response was Monday, but U.S. District Judge Barbara Jones gave GS until July 19 to answer the SEC. According to the SEC, GS did not tell investors that Paulson &amp; Co. helped select the underlying portfolio for a hedge fund. <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/22/goldman-sachs-looking-at-an-image-makeover/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Goldman Sachs Looking at an Image Makeover?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/22/goldman-sachs-looking-at-an-image-makeover/">Goldman Sachs Looking at an Image Makeover?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 22 Jun 2010 15:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/22/goldman-sachs-looking-at-an-image-makeover/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19526406/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/22/goldman-sachs-looking-at-an-image-makeover/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>financial crisis</category><category>Goldman Sachs</category><category>inthenews</category><category>media</category><category>media coverage</category><category>Oprah</category><category>Oprah Winfrey</category><category>public relations</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 15:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Oprah to pull the plug in 2011]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/oprah-to-pull-the-plug-in-2011/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/oprah-to-pull-the-plug-in-2011/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/oprah-to-pull-the-plug-in-2011/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cbs/" rel="tag">CBS Corp 'B' (CBS)</a></p><p><img alt="Oprah Winfrey " hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/oprah-winfrey.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Oprah Winfrey, arguably the most powerful woman in entertainment (if not the world in general), is <a href="http://www.cnbc.com//id/34050986" target="_blank">preparing to pack</a> her luxurious bags. She's announced that in 2011, after a quarter-century of favorite things and heartfelt interviews, "The Oprah Winfrey Show" will be no more. The last program is scheduled for Sept. 9, 2011. One can only imagine who might be her guests. <br /><br />In syndication across the country, Oprah's eponymous program is the top-rated U.S. daytime show (take that, <em>Days of Our Lives!</em>), with an average viewership of 7.1 million this year. <br /><br />While not entirely unexpected, the news is likely a bit of a blow to CBS Corporation (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation/cbs/nys" target="_blank">CBS</a>), as its CBS Television Distribution arm syndicates the program. Additionally, Walt Disney (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys" target="_blank">DIS</a>) might feel the sting of an Oprah departure as Disney-owned ABC is the primary network that airs the show. And will it impact O, Oprah's monthly magazine published by the Heart Corporation? To say nothing of all of the manic women in the audience who long for a chance at one of Oprah's favorite things. </p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/oprah-to-pull-the-plug-in-2011/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Oprah to pull the plug in 2011</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/oprah-to-pull-the-plug-in-2011/">Oprah to pull the plug in 2011</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 20 Nov 2009 10:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.cnbc.com//id/34050986>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/oprah-to-pull-the-plug-in-2011/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19247263/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/oprah-to-pull-the-plug-in-2011/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ABC</category><category>CBS</category><category>DIS</category><category>Discovery Communications</category><category>DiscoveryCommunications</category><category>entertainment</category><category>featured</category><category>Harpo</category><category>inthenews</category><category>oprah winfrey</category><category>oprah winfrey show</category><category>OprahWinfrey</category><category>OprahWinfreyShow</category><category>television</category><category>TV</category><category>Walt disney</category><category>WaltDisney</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Beth Gaston Moon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 10:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Retailers push social media, want bigger wallet share for Christmas]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/02/retailers-push-social-media-want-bigger-wallet-share-for-christ/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/02/retailers-push-social-media-want-bigger-wallet-share-for-christ/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/02/retailers-push-social-media-want-bigger-wallet-share-for-christ/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dell/" rel="tag">Dell (DELL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sbux/" rel="tag">Starbucks (SBUX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nextbigthing/" rel="tag">Next Big Thing</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tgt/" rel="tag">Target Corp. (TGT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bby/" rel="tag">Best Buy (BBY)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/06/twitter_logo_200.jpg" />Once upon a time, retailers measured success by the number of people walking by in the mall, how many    <span style="float: left; margin-right: 10px; margin-top: 7px;"><script> digg_url = 'http://digg.com/business_finance/Retailers_push_social_media_want_bigger_wallet_share'; </script> <script src=" http://digg.com/api/diggthis.js"></script></span>  entered the store, the percentage they spent, and basket size. Now, a world of zeroes and ones has changed their perspective entirely. <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/idUSTRE59T4BE20091030?pageNumber=2&amp;virtualBrandChannel=0" target="_blank">Social media is expected to be the star during the coming holiday season</a>, with retailers pushing <a href="http://www.facebook.com" target="_blank">Facebook</a>, <a href="http://www.youtube.com" target="_blank">YouTube</a>, and <a href="http://twitter.com" target="_blank">Twitter</a> content to get in front of consumers and affect either online or in-store purchases. Smaller Christmas budgets are expected, so the fight is on to garner as large a share as possible of a shrinking pie. </p>
<p>Of course, nobody would come out and say, "<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/Socialmedia/">Social media</a> is nonsense, and I'm not getting anything for my investment." So, when the likes of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/starbucks-corporation/sbux/nas" target="_blank">Starbucks</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/starbucks-corporation/sbux/nas" target="_blank">SBUX</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/penney-j-c-co-inc-holding-co/jcp/nys" target="_blank">JCPenney</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/penney-j-c-co-inc-holding-co/jcp/nys" target="_blank">JCP</a>), and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/target-corporation/tgt/nys" target="_blank">Target</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/target-corporation/tgt/nys" target="_blank">TGT</a>) say that social media is connecting them with their customers and leading to more effective campaigns and product launches, do take it with a grain of salt. What can't be ignored, however, is that they're committing more resources to social media marketing, even though it's still far too soon to tell if it will be effective.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/02/retailers-push-social-media-want-bigger-wallet-share-for-christ/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Retailers push social media, want bigger wallet share for Christmas</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/02/retailers-push-social-media-want-bigger-wallet-share-for-christ/">Retailers push social media, want bigger wallet share for Christmas</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 02 Nov 2009 13:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/02/retailers-push-social-media-want-bigger-wallet-share-for-christ/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19218801/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/02/retailers-push-social-media-want-bigger-wallet-share-for-christ/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bby</category><category>best buy</category><category>dell</category><category>facebook</category><category>forrester research</category><category>inthenews</category><category>jcp</category><category>jcpenney</category><category>oprah winfrey</category><category>retail</category><category>retail sales</category><category>retail stocks</category><category>retailers</category><category>sbux</category><category>social media</category><category>starbucks</category><category>target corp.</category><category>target stores</category><category>tgt</category><category>twitter</category><category>youtube</category><category>youtube.com</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 13:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Can Electronic Arts capitalize on the Wii Fit craze?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/26/can-electronic-arts-capitalize-on-the-wii-fit-craze/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/26/can-electronic-arts-capitalize-on-the-wii-fit-craze/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/26/can-electronic-arts-capitalize-on-the-wii-fit-craze/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/erts/" rel="tag">Electronic Arts (ERTS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/atvi/" rel="tag">Activision Inc (ATVI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ntdoy/" rel="tag">Nintendo (NTDOY)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/erts-electronic-arts-logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/electronic-arts-inc/erts/nas">Electronic Arts</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/electronic-arts-inc/erts/nas">ERTS</a>) hasn't been doing as well as its colleague <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/activision-blizzard-inc/atvi/nas">Activision Blizzard</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/activision-blizzard-inc/atvi/nas">ATVI</a>). Indeed, when it comes to the numbers, Activision, which is responsible for franchise hits <em>Guitar Hero</em> and <em>Call of Duty</em>, has its competitor beat.</p>
<p>But EA recently released an exercise system for the <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nintendo-co-ltd-unsp-adr/ntdoy/nao">Nintendo</a> (OTC: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/nintendo-co-ltd-unsp-adr/ntdoy/nao">NTDOY</a>) Wii that was highlighted at <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/30809934/site/14081545?__source=aol|headline|quote|text|&amp;par=aol">CNBC.com</a>. The piece mentions the enormous marketing presence that is supporting <em><a href="http://www.easportsactive.com/product.action">EA Sports Active</a></em>. You get a couple accessories with the software: a leg strap that is used like a controller to interact with the screen, and a resistance band to increase the effectiveness of the workout. Oprah Winfrey's trainer apparently assisted EA with the design. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/26/can-electronic-arts-capitalize-on-the-wii-fit-craze/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Can Electronic Arts capitalize on the Wii Fit craze?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/26/can-electronic-arts-capitalize-on-the-wii-fit-craze/">Can Electronic Arts capitalize on the Wii Fit craze?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 26 May 2009 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.cnbc.com/id/30809934/site/14081545?__source=aol|headline|quote|text|&amp;par=aol>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.easportsactive.com/product.action>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/26/can-electronic-arts-capitalize-on-the-wii-fit-craze/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1555832/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/26/can-electronic-arts-capitalize-on-the-wii-fit-craze/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>activision blizzard</category><category>ActivisionBlizzard</category><category>ATVI</category><category>Call of Duty</category><category>CallOfDuty</category><category>EA</category><category>ea sports active</category><category>EaSportsActive</category><category>electronic arts</category><category>ElectronicArts</category><category>ERTS</category><category>featured</category><category>Guitar Hero</category><category>GuitarHero</category><category>nintendo</category><category>NTDOY</category><category>Oprah Winfrey</category><category>OprahWinfrey</category><category>Resident Evil</category><category>ResidentEvil</category><category>Wii</category><category>wii fit</category><category>WiiFit</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bear Stearns going too cheap, Oprah Winfrey should buy it]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/19/bear-stearns-going-too-cheap-oprah-winfrey-should-buy-it/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/19/bear-stearns-going-too-cheap-oprah-winfrey-should-buy-it/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/19/bear-stearns-going-too-cheap-oprah-winfrey-should-buy-it/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bsc/" rel="tag">Bear Stearns Cos (BSC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-sell/" rel="tag">Stocks to Sell</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="Oprah Winfrey " src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/oprah-winfrey.jpg" />At a mere $276 million, celebrity talk-show host and entertainment billionaire Oprah Winfrey could afford to buy <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-bear-stearns-companies-inc/bsc/nys">Bear Stearns</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-bear-stearns-companies-inc/bsc/nys">BSC</a>), which closed Tuesday at $5.91 per share and keeps on climbing to over $6.50 a share in morning trading. The story alone and the associated publicity would be worth at least that. Furthermore, she could at least make an offer and demand a meeting with the Federal Reserve Board to discuss the issue.</p>
<p>If her offer was rejected, she would still be able to generate millions of dollars of publicity and perhaps she might want to acquire the asset, in particular if the Fed is going to protect the acquirer from potential losses. She could really become an international mogul, the likes of which has not been seen. We all know that Oprah wants to do good. She is so giving, this could be the ultimate.</p>
<p>I could just see the headlines: <em>Oprah Winfrey takes on </em><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jp-morgan-chase-and-co/jpm/nys?tabs=quotesandnews"><em>JP Morgan Chase</em></a><em> (NYSE: </em><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jp-morgan-chase-and-co/jpm/nys?tabs=quotesandnews"><em>JPM</em></a><em>) and the Federal Reserve to rescue John Q. Public.</em></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/19/bear-stearns-going-too-cheap-oprah-winfrey-should-buy-it/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bear Stearns going too cheap, Oprah Winfrey should buy it</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/19/bear-stearns-going-too-cheap-oprah-winfrey-should-buy-it/">Bear Stearns going too cheap, Oprah Winfrey should buy it</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:52:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nypost.com/seven/03192008/business/bear_hunting_102536.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/19/bear-stearns-going-too-cheap-oprah-winfrey-should-buy-it/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1143871/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/19/bear-stearns-going-too-cheap-oprah-winfrey-should-buy-it/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bear stearns</category><category>BearStearns</category><category>BSC</category><category>chase</category><category>featured</category><category>Federal Reserve</category><category>FederalReserve</category><category>George Lucas</category><category>GeorgeLucas</category><category>Jimmy Cayne</category><category>JimmyCayne</category><category>Joseph Lewis</category><category>JosephLewis</category><category>jp morgan</category><category>JPM</category><category>JpMorgan</category><category>jpmorganchase</category><category>Michael Jordan</category><category>MichaelJordan</category><category>oprah</category><category>oprah winfrey</category><category>oprah's big give</category><category>Oprah'sBigGive</category><category>OprahWinfrey</category><category>Skywalker Ranch</category><category>Steven Spielberg</category><category>StevenSpielberg</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:52:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Oprah's enlightenment quest hits a technological snag]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/04/oprahs-enlightenment-quest-hits-a-technological-snag/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/04/oprahs-enlightenment-quest-hits-a-technological-snag/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/04/oprahs-enlightenment-quest-hits-a-technological-snag/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amzn/" rel="tag">Amazon.com (AMZN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xmsr/" rel="tag">XM Satellite Radio (XMSR)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/books/" rel="tag">Books</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="Oprah Winfrey " src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/oprah-winfrey.jpg" />If Oprah Winfrey can cast a spell that turns thousands of housewives into literature critics and transformed underdog Barack Obama into the possible Democratic nominee for president, getting her followers to embrace an esoteric New Age philosophy should be a snap. Her latest endeavor, though, is going to need more bandwidth.
<p>The talk show queen is getting into the business of enlightenment, offering a 10-week Web seminar with self-help guru Eckhart Tolle, author of "A New Earth," an amalgam of Buddhist, Christian and Islamic influences, according to<a href="http://www.usatoday.com/life/people/2008-03-02-oprah-tolle_N.htm"> USA Today</a>. The book also happens to be the latest pick of Oprah's Book Club. </p>
<p>Last night's first webcast was one of the largest events in the history of the internet, attracting more than 500,000 people. "Unfortunately, some of our users experienced delays in viewing the webcast," according to a <a href="http://www2.oprah.com/about/press/releases/200803/press_releases_20080304.jhtml">statement from Oprah's Harpo Productions</a>. "We are working to identify the specific causes for the problems experienced and will work diligently to rectify them." </p>
<p> Seekers of enlightenment be forewarned, the path outlined by "A New Earth" isn't an easy one.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/04/oprahs-enlightenment-quest-hits-a-technological-snag/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Oprah's enlightenment quest hits a technological snag</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/04/oprahs-enlightenment-quest-hits-a-technological-snag/">Oprah's enlightenment quest hits a technological snag</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 04 Mar 2008 15:08:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/04/oprahs-enlightenment-quest-hits-a-technological-snag/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1131153/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/04/oprahs-enlightenment-quest-hits-a-technological-snag/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>A New Earth</category><category>ANewEarth</category><category>Eckhart Tolle</category><category>EckhartTolle</category><category>Oprah</category><category>Oprah Winfrey</category><category>Oprah's Book Club</category><category>Oprah'sBookClub</category><category>OprahWinfrey</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 15:08:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Oprah Winfrey to get her own network!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/16/oprah-winfrey-to-get-her-own-network/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/16/oprah-winfrey-to-get-her-own-network/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/16/oprah-winfrey-to-get-her-own-network/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a></p><p>Oprah Winfrey is <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/16/arts/television/16oprah.html?ref=business">teaming up</a> with Discovery Communications to create a new network, cleverly titled OWN, the Oprah Winfrey Network.</p>
<p>The network will not carry her trademark Oprah Winfrey Show to start, but since Ms. Winfrey has the option of ending her deal for the show with the networks in 2010 and 2011, she could move the show there then.</p>
<p>Winfrey told reporters that "Eventually that will happen, we hope". Discovery will own half of the network, and Winfrey's production company will own the other half.</p>
<p>Oprah Winfrey moving to her own cable network would, if it does happen, send shock waves through the television industry and create additional problems for the already beleaguered networks. Similar to Radiohead's decision to forgo the major labels and release their album on their own, such a move would send a clear message to the networks: Cable is ubiquitous enough that top stars don't need you: We can do it ourselves and keep a bigger chunk of the money.</p>
<p>It's too soon to know what will happen. The new network could flop, but given Oprah's popularity, I seriously doubt that will happen.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/16/oprah-winfrey-to-get-her-own-network/">Oprah Winfrey to get her own network!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:33:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/16/arts/television/16oprah.html?ref=business>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/16/oprah-winfrey-to-get-her-own-network/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1088171/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/16/oprah-winfrey-to-get-her-own-network/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Discovery</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Oprah Winfrey</category><category>OprahWinfrey</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:33:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Best &amp; Worst of 2007: Final results]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/27/best-and-worst-of-2007-final-results/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/27/best-and-worst-of-2007-final-results/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/27/best-and-worst-of-2007-final-results/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xom/" rel="tag">Exxon Mobil (XOM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mcd/" rel="tag">McDonald's (MCD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jblu/" rel="tag">JetBlue Airways (JBLU)</a></p><p>BloggingStocks readers and AOL Money &amp; Finance visitors have spoken, and below are the <a href="http://money.aol.com/special/best-and-worst-2007">Best &amp; Worst of 2007</a>. (See the individual posts for full results.)</p>
<p><a title="View Best &amp; Worst of 2007: Company of the year on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/29/best-and-worst-of-2007-company-of-the-year/" target="_blank"><strong>Company of the Year</strong></a><strong>:</strong> <a href="http://money.aol.com/special/best-and-worst-2007/winners?photo=3">Google</a>, internet search provider turned diversified services giant, received 51% of the vote, beating such strong contenders as Apple and Coca-Cola.</p>
<p><a title="View Best &amp; Worst of 2007: Hottest gadget of the year on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/30/best-and-worst-of-2007-hottest-gadget-of-the-year/" target="_blank"><strong>Hottest Gadget of the Year</strong></a><strong>:</strong> After all the hoopla surrounding the launch of the <a href="http://money.aol.com/special/best-and-worst-2007/winners?photo=2">iPhone</a>, it's no big surprise that it tops this category, with 47% of the vote, besting second place finisher the Nintendo Wii.</p>
<p><a title="View Best &amp; Worst of 2007: Dumbest celebrity 'feuds' on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/01/best-and-worst-of-2007-dumbest-celebrity-feuds/" target="_blank"><strong>Dumbest Celebrity Feud</strong></a><strong>:</strong> <a href="http://money.aol.com/special/best-and-worst-2007/winners?photo=4">Rosie O'Donnell's squabbles with Donald Trump</a> (and also with Elizabeth Hasselbeck) garnered 66% of the vote, easily beating out the back-and-forth between Britney Spears and her ex, Kevin Federline.</p>
<p><a title="View Best &amp; Worst of 2007: Hottest cars of the year on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/01/best-and-worst-of-2007-hottest-cars-of-the-year/" target="_blank"><strong>Hottest Car of the Year</strong></a><strong>:</strong> The <a href="http://money.aol.com/special/best-and-worst-2007/winners?photo=13">Cadillac CTS</a> led with 43% of the vote, easily beating the BMW M3 and others in this category.</p>
<p><a title="View Best &amp; Worst of 2007: Dumbest moments in business on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/02/best-and-worst-of-2007-dumbest-moments-in-business/" target="_blank"><strong>Dumbest Moment in Business</strong></a><strong>:</strong> <a href="http://money.aol.com/special/best-and-worst-2007/winners?photo=5">JetBlue's</a> stranding of passengers on a cramped, grounded airliner for hours netted 51% of the vote.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/27/best-and-worst-of-2007-final-results/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Best &amp; Worst of 2007: Final results</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/27/best-and-worst-of-2007-final-results/">Best &amp; Worst of 2007: Final results</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 27 Dec 2007 15:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/27/best-and-worst-of-2007-final-results/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1071335/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/27/best-and-worst-of-2007-final-results/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Britney Spears</category><category>Cadillac CTS</category><category>Chuck Prince</category><category>Dubai</category><category>ExxonMobil</category><category>globalization</category><category>GOOG</category><category>Google</category><category>iPhone</category><category>JBLU</category><category>JetBlue</category><category>Martha Stewart</category><category>MCD</category><category>McDonald's</category><category>oil prices</category><category>Oprah Winfrey</category><category>Rosie O'Donnell</category><category>Sanjaya Malakar</category><category>weak dollar</category><category>XOM</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trey Thoelcke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 15:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Money Winners of 2007: For Rachael Ray, success sizzles]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/15/money-winners-of-2007-for-rachel-ray-success-sizzles/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/15/money-winners-of-2007-for-rachel-ray-success-sizzles/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/15/money-winners-of-2007-for-rachel-ray-success-sizzles/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rich-in-america/" rel="tag">Rich in America</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/books/" rel="tag">Books</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/kft/" rel="tag">Kraft Foods'A' (KFT)</a></p><p><img width="150" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="239" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/rachael-ray.jpg" alt="Rachael Ray " />Rachael Ray went from scraping together the rent as a candy counter girl to a multi-millionaire with her own talk show, cooking show(s), magazine, and books that have sold more than 4 million copies. She's also spawned a lingo all her own. (EVOO for Extra Virgin Olive Oil <a href="http://www.aoltv.com/2006/12/11/evoo-added-to-dictionary-rachel-rays-world-domination-plan-con/">has entered the popular vernacular</a>). All this in a little under ten years.</p>
<p>How cool is that?</p>
<p>Love her or hate her, Rachael Ray, she of the perky smile and Girl-next-door demeanor, gets major points for translating her love of cooking into a multi-million media empire. People can't seem to get enough of her "regular gal" persona. But her bubbly personality masks some serious business savvy.</p>
<p>Using her mentor Oprah Winfrey as a blueprint, Ray has <a href="http://www.forbes.com/lists/2007/53/07celebrities_Rachael-Ray_1CT5.html">expanded out of the kitchen</a> this year into many other avenues. Her one-hour daytime talk show, <em>The Rachel Ray Show</em>, is patterned after the perennially popular <em>Oprah Winfrey Show, </em>and was the only syndicated daytime talk show launched in 2007 to be renewed. Her Food Network shows continue to be among the most popular on the channel.</p>
<p>She also cooked up some lucrative endorsement deals with name brands such as Dunkin Donuts and Nabisco -- now owned by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/kraft-foods-inc/kft/nys">Kraft Foods</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/kraft-foods-inc/kft/nys">KFT</a>). These media venues help feed her magazine (<em>Every Day with Rachel Ray</em>) and cookbook sales.</p>
<p>These are like the cherry on top of <a href="http://www.forbes.com/2007/06/12/07celebrities_Chefs_slide_2.html?thisSpeed=30000">the $16 million Ray took home</a> this year, according to <em>Forbes</em> magazine. By some estimates, Ray's net worth is touching $100 million, but that's hard to verify. One thing's for sure, this gal doesn't need to get out of the kitchen; she's proving that she can stand the heat.</p>
<p><span class="news_story_title"><em>Be sure to check out more <strong><a href="http://money.aol.com/special/money-winners-2007">Money Winners of 2007</a></strong>.</em></span></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/15/money-winners-of-2007-for-rachel-ray-success-sizzles/">Money Winners of 2007: For Rachael Ray, success sizzles</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 15 Dec 2007 11:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/15/money-winners-of-2007-for-rachel-ray-success-sizzles/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1055724/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/15/money-winners-of-2007-for-rachel-ray-success-sizzles/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Dunkin Donuts</category><category>EVOO</category><category>Food Network</category><category>KFT</category><category>Kraft Foods</category><category>Money Winners 2007</category><category>Nabisco</category><category>Oprah Winfrey</category><category>Rachel Ray</category><category>Rachel Ray Show</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Julie Tilsner]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 11:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Money Winners of 2007: Oprah Winfrey remains media queen]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/14/money-winners-of-2007-oprah-winfrey/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/14/money-winners-of-2007-oprah-winfrey/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/14/money-winners-of-2007-oprah-winfrey/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mandftoday/" rel="tag">Money and Finance Today</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/presidential-elections/" rel="tag">Presidential Elections</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="TV personality Oprah Winfrey "  src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/oprah-winfrey.jpg" />Remember how they used to say that the sun never set on the British empire. The same goes for talk show queen Oprah Winfrey's empire.</p>
<p>In an era when most media conglomerates struggle, Winfrey has the midas touch, which is why her endorsement of Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama may have a huge impact on the election. Her continuing presence at the pop culture zeitgeist is nothing short of remarkable.</p>
<p>Ratings for "The Oprah Winfrey Show" remain strong. When she got 100 plus members of the Osmond clan on her program on November 12 following the death of patriarch George, she scored her best ratings since the prior January, according to <a href="http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6500295.html">Broadcast and Cable. </a>During the week ended November 25, Her protege Dr. Phil McGraw earned a 5.5 rating, trailing Winfrey's show, which got a 5.7, but her ratings included Thanksgiving while his didn't, the trade publication says.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/14/money-winners-of-2007-oprah-winfrey/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Money Winners of 2007: Oprah Winfrey remains media queen</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/14/money-winners-of-2007-oprah-winfrey/">Money Winners of 2007: Oprah Winfrey remains media queen</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 14 Dec 2007 16:18:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/14/money-winners-of-2007-oprah-winfrey/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1059411/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/14/money-winners-of-2007-oprah-winfrey/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>barack obama</category><category>democratic party</category><category>O-The Oprah Magazine</category><category>oprah winfrey</category><category>presidential election</category><category>The Oprah Winfrey Show</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 16:18:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Best &amp; Worst of 2007: Early voting results]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/08/best-and-worst-of-2007-early-voting-results/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/08/best-and-worst-of-2007-early-voting-results/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/08/best-and-worst-of-2007-early-voting-results/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hd/" rel="tag">Home Depot (HD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xom/" rel="tag">Exxon Mobil (XOM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mcd/" rel="tag">McDonald's (MCD)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bac/" rel="tag">Bank of America (BAC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jblu/" rel="tag">JetBlue Airways (JBLU)</a></p><p>We recently took a look at the <a href="http://money.aol.com/special/best-and-worst-2007">Best &amp; Worst of 2007</a> in sixteen categories and asked you to vote for your favorites, as well as sharing the reasons for your picks and any other contenders we may have overlooked. And voting is off to a strong start, with more than 100,000 votes in each category so far.</p>
<p>Some categories have shaped up to be close races. Chuck Prince, Bill Ford, and Bob Nardelli each have a little less than a third of the vote for <a title="View Best &amp; Worst of 2007: Best CEO departure of 2007 on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/29/best-and-worst-of-2007-best-ceo-departure-of-2007/" target="_blank">Best CEO Departure of the Year</a>. Britney Spears and Michael Vick are neck and neck as the <a title="View Best &amp; Worst of 2007: Celebrities most likely to lose it all on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/02/best-and-worst-of-2007-celebrities-most-likely-to-lose-it-all/" target="_blank">Celebrity Most Likely to Lose It All</a>, while Lindsey Lohan's relatively low profile recently has garnered her just 6 percent of that vote. In the <a title="View Best &amp; Worst of 2007: Shameless attempts at cashing in on '15 minutes' on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/29/best-and-worst-of-2007-shameless-attempts-at-cashing-in-on-15/" target="_blank">Most Shameless Attempt at Cashing in on '15 Minutes'</a>, Sanjaya Malakar has a slim lead over Howard K. Stern/Larry Birkhead, but poor Chris "Leave Britney Alone!" Crocker has gotten no respect with a mere 6 percent of the vote. McDonald's has a small lead as the <a title="View Best &amp; Worst of 2007: Hottest chain restaurant on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/02/best-and-worst-of-2007-hottest-chain-restaurant/" target="_blank">Hottest Chain Restaurant</a>, thought Chipotle isn't far behind with more than a quarter of the vote. And while the iPhone has the lead now as the <a title="View Best &amp; Worst of 2007: Hottest gadget of the year on BloggingStocks" href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/30/best-and-worst-of-2007-hottest-gadget-of-the-year/" target="_blank">Hottest Gadget of the Year</a>, it and the Nintendo Wii have been trading places as the front runner. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/08/best-and-worst-of-2007-early-voting-results/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Best &amp; Worst of 2007: Early voting results</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/08/best-and-worst-of-2007-early-voting-results/">Best &amp; Worst of 2007: Early voting results</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 08 Dec 2007 16:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/08/best-and-worst-of-2007-early-voting-results/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1054623/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/08/best-and-worst-of-2007-early-voting-results/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AOL</category><category>Austin</category><category>Bank of America</category><category>Best and Worst of 2007</category><category>Best Buy</category><category>Bill Ford</category><category>BMW M3</category><category>Bob Nardelli</category><category>Britney Spears</category><category>Cadillac CTS</category><category>Chipotle</category><category>Chris Crocker</category><category>Chuck Prince</category><category>Comcast</category><category>Donald Trump</category><category>Dubai</category><category>ExxonMobil</category><category>Garmin</category><category>Goldman Sachs</category><category>Google</category><category>Home Depot</category><category>Howard K. Stern</category><category>Jet Blue</category><category>Larry Birkhead</category><category>Lindsey Lohan</category><category>Martha Stewart</category><category>McDonald's</category><category>Michael Vick</category><category>Microsoft</category><category>Neil Cavuto</category><category>oil prices</category><category>Oprah Winfrey</category><category>private equity</category><category>Regions Bank</category><category>Research in Motion</category><category>Rosie O'Donnell</category><category>Sanjaya Malakar</category><category>Wal-Mart</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trey Thoelcke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 16:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Rural groups lobby for Sirius/XM merger]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/24/aint-that-america-rural-groups-lobby-for-sirius-xm-merge/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/24/aint-that-america-rural-groups-lobby-for-sirius-xm-merge/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/24/aint-that-america-rural-groups-lobby-for-sirius-xm-merge/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xmsr/" rel="tag">XM Satellite Radio (XMSR)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/siri/" rel="tag">Sirius Satellite Radio (SIRI)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a></p><img width="180" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="180" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/sirius-siri-logo.gif" alt="" />This week, <a href="http://www.orbitcast.com/archives/five-rural-groups-unite-to-defend-siriusxm-merger.html" target="_blank">another group added their support</a> to a merger between the two satellite radio companies: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/xm-satellite-radio-holdings-inc/xmsr/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">XM Satellite Radio Holdings </a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/xm-satellite-radio-holdings-inc/xmsr/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">XMSR</a>)'s and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sirius-satellite-radio-inc/siri/nas">Sirius Satellite Radio Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sirius-satellite-radio-inc/siri/nas">SIRI</a>). A quintet of organizations representing rural Americans presented a letter to Federal Communications Commission (FCC) head Jonathan Adelstein. An excerpt from <a href="http://www.siriusmerger.com/uploads/Rural_Support_letter_FINAL.pdf" target="_blank">the letter</a> read: <br /><br /><em>"This merger is clearly in the best interest of rural consumers because it would allow a combined company to expand upon its existing services with increased efficiencies and at the same time provide rural listeners with more diverse programming and lower pricing ... [the merger] will make satellite radio a more viable option for rural consumers ... even in the most remote areas." </em><br /><br />Indeed, a combination of the two companies could bring all 4 major sports, Oprah and Stern, and John Cougar Mellencamp and Bruce Springsteen tunes, virtually commercial free, to households distanced from terrestrial broadcast towers. <br /><br />Originally announced on February 19, 2007, this partnership continues to be closely scrutinized by the FCC as well as the National Association of Broadcasters (NAB). The latter organization effectively represents the combined company's would-be competition, weakening the argument that the satellite-radio merger stifles competition. But I digress before I slip into a monopoly wormhole. <br /><br /><em>Beth Gaston Moon is an analyst at <a href="http://www.schaeffersresearch.com/commentary/optionbytes.aspx">Schaeffer's Investment Research</a></em>.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/24/aint-that-america-rural-groups-lobby-for-sirius-xm-merge/">Rural groups lobby for Sirius/XM merger</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 24 Oct 2007 19:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.orbitcast.com/archives/five-rural-groups-unite-to-defend-siriusxm-merger.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/24/aint-that-america-rural-groups-lobby-for-sirius-xm-merge/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1019252/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/24/aint-that-america-rural-groups-lobby-for-sirius-xm-merge/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>acquisitions</category><category>FCC</category><category>Federal Communications Commission</category><category>FederalCommunicationsCommission</category><category>howard stern</category><category>HowardStern</category><category>mergers</category><category>NAB</category><category>National Association of Broadcasters</category><category>NationalAssociationOfBroadcasters</category><category>oprah winfrey</category><category>OprahWinfrey</category><category>satellite radio</category><category>SatelliteRadio</category><category>SIRI</category><category>XMSR</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Beth Gaston Moon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 19:31:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Money Face-Off Big Winners: Oprah, Tiger Woods, Ivanka Trump, Erin Burnett]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/06/money-face-off-big-winners-oprah-tiger-woods-ivanka-trump-er/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/06/money-face-off-big-winners-oprah-tiger-woods-ivanka-trump-er/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/06/money-face-off-big-winners-oprah-tiger-woods-ivanka-trump-er/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/entrepreneurs/" rel="tag">Entrepreneurs</a></p><p>It's been three weeks since our <a href="http://money.aol.com/investing/money-face-off-business-superstars"><strong>Money Face-Off</strong></a> feature ran here at BloggingStocks and on AOL, offering you the opportunity to share who you though had the financial edge in a series of twenty head-to-head match-ups. So I thought I'd take another look and see how things have worked out. </p>
<p>It's hard to pick just one big winner. In terms of the largest lead over a rival, <strong><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-ivanka-trump-vs-paris-hilton/">Ivanka Trump</a></strong> easily beats Paris Hilton with 89% of the vote. Others holding big leads over their opponents include <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-tiger-woods-vs-david-beckham/"><strong>Tiger Woods</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/16/money-face-off-warren-buffett-vs-eddie-lampert/"><strong>Warren Buffett</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-george-lucas-vs-steven-spielberg/"><strong>Steven Spielberg</strong></a>, and <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-rupert-murdoch-vs-sumner-redstone/"><strong>Rupert Murdoch</strong></a>. </p>
<p>In terms of receiving the most votes, the clear leader is the <strong><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-oprah-winfrey-vs-martha-stewart/">Oprah Winfrey vs. Martha Stewart</a></strong> match-up, with just short of 150,000 votes. Other big vote getters were <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-tiger-woods-vs-david-beckham/"><strong>Tiger Woods vs. David Beckham</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/16/money-face-off-rudy-giuliani-vs-mike-bloomberg/"><strong>Rudy Giuliani vs. Michael Bloomberg</strong></a>, and <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-steve-jobs-vs-bill-gates/"><strong>Bill Gates vs. Steve Jobs</strong></a>. In terms of the liveliest discussions in the comments, the winners are <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-oprah-winfrey-vs-martha-stewart/"><strong>Oprah Winfrey vs. Martha Stewart</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-maria-bartiromo-versus-erin-burnett/"><strong>Erin Burnett vs. Maria Bartiromo</strong></a>, and <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/16/money-face-off-bono-vs-angelina-jolie/"><strong>Bono vs. Angelina Jolie</strong></a>. Also check out the comments for the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/16/money-face-off-jrr-tolkien-vs-jk-rowling/"><strong>J.K. Rowling vs. J.R.R Tolkien</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-tiger-woods-vs-david-beckham/"><strong>Tiger Woods vs. David Beckham</strong></a>, and <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-ivanka-trump-vs-paris-hilton/"><strong>Ivanka Trump vs. Paris Hilton</strong></a> posts. </p>
<p>As for the face-off posts here that got the most attention, the clear winner is <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-maria-bartiromo-versus-erin-burnett/"><strong>Erin Burnett vs. Maria Bartiromo</strong></a>, with more than 13,000 hits. <strong><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-britney-spears-vs-lindsay-lohan/">Lindsay Lohan vs. Britney Spears</a></strong> and <strong><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-oprah-winfrey-vs-martha-stewart/">Oprah Winfrey vs. Martha Stewart</a></strong> also attracted lots of readers.</p>
<p>Results for all the face-offs follow below, but keep in mind that the voting is still open. It's not too late to add your vote or let us know what you think.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/06/money-face-off-big-winners-oprah-tiger-woods-ivanka-trump-er/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Money Face-Off Big Winners: Oprah, Tiger Woods, Ivanka Trump, Erin Burnett</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/06/money-face-off-big-winners-oprah-tiger-woods-ivanka-trump-er/">Money Face-Off Big Winners: Oprah, Tiger Woods, Ivanka Trump, Erin Burnett</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 06 Oct 2007 12:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/06/money-face-off-big-winners-oprah-tiger-woods-ivanka-trump-er/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1006754/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/06/money-face-off-big-winners-oprah-tiger-woods-ivanka-trump-er/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Alan Greenspan</category><category>Angelina Jolie</category><category>Ben Bernanke</category><category>Bill Gates</category><category>Bono</category><category>Britney Spears</category><category>Carl Icahn</category><category>David Beckham</category><category>Diddy</category><category>Eddie Lampert</category><category>Erin Burnett</category><category>George Lucas</category><category>George Steinbrenner</category><category>Heidi Klum</category><category>Henry Kravis</category><category>Ivanka Trump</category><category>J.K. Rowling</category><category>J.R.R. Tolkien</category><category>Jay-Z</category><category>Jim Cramer</category><category>John Bogle</category><category>Kirk Kerkorian</category><category>Lindsay Lohan</category><category>Maria Bartiromo</category><category>Mark Cuban</category><category>Martha Stewart</category><category>Mike Bloomberg</category><category>Money Face-Offs</category><category>Oprah Winfrey</category><category>Paris Hilton</category><category>Peter Lynch</category><category>Rudy Giuliani</category><category>Rupert Murdoch</category><category>Steve Jobs</category><category>Steve Schwarzman</category><category>Steven Spielberg</category><category>Sumner Redstone</category><category>Suze Orman</category><category>Tiger Woods</category><category>Tyra Banks</category><category>Warren Buffett</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trey Thoelcke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 12:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Money Face-Off recap: Oprah and Tiger and Buffett, oh my!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/22/money-face-off-recap-oprah-and-tiger-and-buffett-oh-my/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/22/money-face-off-recap-oprah-and-tiger-and-buffett-oh-my/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/22/money-face-off-recap-oprah-and-tiger-and-buffett-oh-my/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/entrepreneurs/" rel="tag">Entrepreneurs</a></p><p>It's been a week since our <strong>Money Face-Off</strong> posts ran here on BloggingStocks, and less than that since the <a href="http://money.aol.com/investing/money-face-off-business-superstars">Money Face-Offs</a> were featured on the AOL welcome page, and the response has been terrific. Many of the face-off polls have had more than 50,000 votes, a couple of them approaching 100,000. </p>
<p>The biggest response came to the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-oprah-winfrey-vs-martha-stewart/">Oprah Winfrey vs. Martha Stewart</a> match-up. So far, about 75 percent of respondents feel that Oprah is the more successful media magnate. Not that much surprise there, as Oprah's fans are legion. Interestingly, though, of the twenty-some comments the post has received, most of them are pro-Martha.</p>
<p>Another clear leader is <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-steve-jobs-vs-bill-gates/">Bill Gates over rival Steve Jobs</a>. About three quarters of poll votes have gone his way, despite all the buzz recently about <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">Apple Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas">AAPL</a>) and the popularity of its products. Maybe readers are just happy that Gates is stepping down. Let us know what you think.</p>
<p>Alan Greenspan seems to be everywhere these days, promoting his new book, including Comedy Central's <em>The Daily Show</em> and NPR's <em>Fresh Air</em>. In our match-up of the current and former Fed chairs, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-alan-greenspan-vs-ben-bernanke/">Ben Bernanke vs. Alan Greenspan</a>, more than 70 percent of respondents have voted for Greenspan. Comments to the post are mixed, but seem to me to focus on Greenspan, whether pro or con.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/22/money-face-off-recap-oprah-and-tiger-and-buffett-oh-my/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Money Face-Off recap: Oprah and Tiger and Buffett, oh my!</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/22/money-face-off-recap-oprah-and-tiger-and-buffett-oh-my/">Money Face-Off recap: Oprah and Tiger and Buffett, oh my!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 22 Sep 2007 15:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/22/money-face-off-recap-oprah-and-tiger-and-buffett-oh-my/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/995955/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/22/money-face-off-recap-oprah-and-tiger-and-buffett-oh-my/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AAPL</category><category>Alan Greenspan</category><category>Angelina Jolie</category><category>Apple</category><category>Ben Bernanke</category><category>Bill Gates</category><category>Bono</category><category>Britney Spears</category><category>David Beckham</category><category>Eddie Lampert</category><category>George Lucas</category><category>George Steinbrenner</category><category>Ivanka Trump</category><category>Lindsay Lohan</category><category>Mark Cuban</category><category>Martha Stewart</category><category>Money Face-Off</category><category>Oprah Winfrey</category><category>Paris Hilton</category><category>Rupert Murdoch</category><category>Steve Jobs</category><category>Steven Spielberg</category><category>Sumner Redstone</category><category>the Fed</category><category>Tiger Woods</category><category>Warren Buffett</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trey Thoelcke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 15:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Money Face-Off: Oprah Winfrey vs. Martha Stewart]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-oprah-winfrey-vs-martha-stewart/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-oprah-winfrey-vs-martha-stewart/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-oprah-winfrey-vs-martha-stewart/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/entrepreneurs/" rel="tag">Entrepreneurs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mso/" rel="tag">Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia (MSO)</a></p><p><em>This post is part of our <strong><a href="http://money.aol.com/investing/money-face-off-business-superstars">Money Face-Offs</a></strong> feature. Let us know who you think comes out ahead in this head-to-head match-up, and check out our other Money Face-Off posts.</em></p>
<p><em><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/face-off-240-media-ladies-oprah-cs091207.jpg" alt="" />Celebrities -- they're more than superior human beings, they're money-making machines. If these celebrities were stocks, which would be the shrewd buy?</em></p>
<p>One sure sign of celebrity is first-name recognition, and today's contestants have certainly reached that pinnacle. Oprah and Martha are brands known worldwide, Oprah for compassion and wisdom, Martha for style and elegance.</p>
<p>Martha Stewart's brand is still tainted by her 2004 insider trading conviction and her stretch in Camp Cupcake. Before then, <a href="http://www.answers.com/martha+stewart?cat=biz-fin">her growth from model and stockbroker to America's favorite lifestyle celebrity</a> was impressive. After authoring the bestselling book <em>Entertaining</em> in 1979, she transitioned to television with her hit show <em>Martha Stewart Living</em>, for which she gathered several Emmys. In 1987, she inked a lucrative deal with d&eacute;class&eacute; retailer Kmart as a lifestyle consultant, to help it break into higher price-point retailing. In 1990, with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Time Warner</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">TWX</a>) she launched <em>Martha Stewart Living Magazine</em>. The zenith of her career came in 1997 when she took herself public. The IPO for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/martha-stewart-living-omnimedia-inc/mso/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/martha-stewart-living-omnimedia-inc/mso/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">MSO</a>) made her a billionaire.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-oprah-winfrey-vs-martha-stewart/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Money Face-Off: Oprah Winfrey vs. Martha Stewart</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-oprah-winfrey-vs-martha-stewart/">Money Face-Off: Oprah Winfrey vs. Martha Stewart</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 15 Sep 2007 09:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-oprah-winfrey-vs-martha-stewart/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/979942/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-oprah-winfrey-vs-martha-stewart/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>billionaire women</category><category>billionaires</category><category>celebrities</category><category>Color Purple</category><category>expire-images:2008-9-14</category><category>featured</category><category>Harpo Productions</category><category>martha</category><category>martha stewart</category><category>Martha Stewart Living</category><category>mso</category><category>oprah</category><category>oprah winfrey</category><category>television stars</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TWX</category><category>women entrepenuers</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Barlow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 09:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Can Oprah Winfrey redeem Michael Vick?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/29/can-oprah-winfrey-redeem-michael-vick/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/29/can-oprah-winfrey-redeem-michael-vick/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/29/can-oprah-winfrey-redeem-michael-vick/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dis/" rel="tag">Walt Disney (DIS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cbs/" rel="tag">CBS Corp 'B' (CBS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/nws/" rel="tag">News Corp'B' (NWS)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><img height="133" alt="Oprah Winfrey" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/about_photoid_top.gif" width="200" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Suspended Atlanta Falcons quarterback Michael Vick's best chance at public redemption lies with Oprah Winfrey. At least that's the conclusion of <em>Detroit Free Press</em> columnist <a href="http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070829/COL08/708290344/1081">Drew Sharp</a>, who makes a convincing argument that "now that pop culture dictates news judgment, it's only appropriate that a pop culture diva quite possibly holds the key to Michael Vick's NFL future."</p>
<p>Vick should take Sharp's advice. If Vick goes on Oprah, his handlers would no doubt encourage him to cry, talk about "finding Jesus" and encourage young people to make smart decisions. Unfortunately for Vick, the road to redemption starts with the talk show queen. Vick will have to spend the next few months apologizing until the American public is sick of seeing his face.</p>
<p>The question for Vick's handlers is where to go after Oprah. </p>
<p>Will he try to reach NFL fans through <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">Walt Disney Co.</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-walt-disney-company/dis/nys">DIS</a>) ESPN cable network or <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">News Corp.</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/news-corporation/nws/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">NWS</a>) Fox?</p>
<p>What about the morning shows? You can bet that ABC, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">General Electric Co.</a>'s (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys?tabs=quotesandnews"> GE</a>) NBC and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation-cl-b/cbs/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">CBS Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cbs-corporation-cl-b/cbs/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">CBS</a>) would kill to land an interview with the disgraced athlete. "Dateline" and "60 Minutes" are probably working on stories about the evils of dog fighting. The story also continues to be the gift that keeps on giving for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner Inc.</a>'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>) CNN, Fox News channel, and MSNBC.</p>
<p>But I am not sure that all of the apologizing in the world can save Vick's NFL career. People understand that young, rich athletes misbehave and occasionally break the law. But Vick's behavior was so heinous that it defies explanation.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/29/can-oprah-winfrey-redeem-michael-vick/">Can Oprah Winfrey redeem Michael Vick?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 29 Aug 2007 11:42:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070829/COL08/708290344/1081>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/29/can-oprah-winfrey-redeem-michael-vick/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/976652/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/29/can-oprah-winfrey-redeem-michael-vick/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ABC</category><category>atlanta falcons</category><category>AtlantaFalcons</category><category>broadcast journalism</category><category>BroadcastJournalism</category><category>CBS</category><category>CNN</category><category>DIS</category><category>featured</category><category>FOX NEWS</category><category>FoxNews</category><category>GE</category><category>journalism</category><category>michael vick</category><category>MichaelVick</category><category>NBC</category><category>nfl</category><category>NWS</category><category>oprah winfrey</category><category>OprahWinfrey</category><category>tv</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 11:42:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Oprah enters the wild world of brick-and-mortar retail]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/28/oprah-enters-the-wild-world-of-brick-and-mortar-retail/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/28/oprah-enters-the-wild-world-of-brick-and-mortar-retail/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/28/oprah-enters-the-wild-world-of-brick-and-mortar-retail/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xmsr/" rel="tag">XM Satellite Radio (XMSR)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/06/harpo.jpg"  alt="" />For those of you who just aren't sated by the daily one-hour program, the monthly magazine, occasional feature films and made-for-TV movies, and the radio content available at <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/xm-satellite-radio-holdings-inc/xmsr/nas">XM Satellite Radio</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/xm-satellite-radio-holdings-inc/xmsr/nas">XMSR</a>), you'll be relieved to hear that a <a href="http://www.suntimes.com/entertainment/people/444927,CST-NWS-oprah27.article" target="_blank">one-stop shop for all things Oprah</a> is in the works. <br /><br />Oprah Winfrey's privately held company, Harpo Inc., released a statement indicating that construction has started on a store carrying Oprah merchandise. The boutique will be located catty-corner from the Harpo Studios building in downtown Chicago and will be one story and 4,500 square feet. Many details, including an opening date, have yet to be worked out. <br /><br />The queen of the entertainment world already sells some products through an online store. Oprah fans can pick up a $14 iPod cover with the Oprah logo, DVDs, and African apparel and artwork. The Chicago Sun-Times reports that these and other Oprah-related merchandise will also be available in the retail store. Know a co-worker or friend that's expecting? The $36 'O Baby' <a href="http://boutique.oprah.com/product/show/6177" target="_blank">velour jogging suit</a> could be the perfect gift. <em><br /><br /><em>Beth Gaston Moon is an analyst at </em><a href="http://www.schaeffersresearch.com/"><em>Schaeffer's Investment Research</em></a><em>.</em></em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/28/oprah-enters-the-wild-world-of-brick-and-mortar-retail/">Oprah enters the wild world of brick-and-mortar retail</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 28 Jun 2007 16:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.suntimes.com/entertainment/people/444927,CST-NWS-oprah27.article>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/28/oprah-enters-the-wild-world-of-brick-and-mortar-retail/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/928619/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/28/oprah-enters-the-wild-world-of-brick-and-mortar-retail/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Harpo</category><category>Oprah Winfrey</category><category>OprahWinfrey</category><category>retailing</category><category>xm satellite radio</category><category>XmSatelliteRadio</category><category>XMSR</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Beth Gaston Moon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 16:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Random House offers refund for "A Million Little Pieces"]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/random-house-offers-refund-for-a-million-little-pieces/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/random-house-offers-refund-for-a-million-little-pieces/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/random-house-offers-refund-for-a-million-little-pieces/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/books/" rel="tag">Books</a></p><img width="240" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="195" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/05/frey.jpg" />Random House, a division of the privately held media conglomerate Bertelsmann AG, is <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/culture/2007/05/18/2007-05-18_authors_23m_lie.html">offering compensation</a> to any reader claiming to be "duped" by James Frey's memoir, <em>A Million Little Pieces</em>. <br /><br />Frey's story was a scandal that broke in January of last year. The author's ostensibly non-fiction book described, in excruciating <span style=""></span><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial;"></span> detail, his miserable existence within an alcohol and drug-addled haze. Toe-curling details include a three-month stint in jail, an anesthesia-free trip to the dentist, and time in rehab. <br /><br />Published in April 2003, the book hit the best-seller list more than two years later, after Oprah Winfrey named it her September 2005 book club selection. But Frey's ride of success wasn't long; in January 2006, it was revealed that the "memoir" contained outright fabrications. (Essentially, Frey is the Milli Vanilli of modern American literature). Readers who bought <em>A Million Little Pieces </em>before January 26, 2006 (around the time Frey confessed that his penned story wasn't entirely true) are now entitled to a refund from the publisher. <br /><br />Those who bought the hardcover copy will receive as much as $23.95; ones who bought the book in paperback will get a maximum refund of $14.95. The entire program is expected to cost Random House $2.35 million. The publisher's decision, approved by a Manhattan Federal Judge, is expected to resolve several lawsuits already filed across the country by disgruntled readers. <br /><br />While Frey's fabrications are certainly reprehensible, the fact remains that <em>A Million Little Pieces </em>reportedly helped countless readers who were struggling with their own addictions. I can't help but wonder how Frey's real story might have gone if he'd pitched his book as one "inspired by true events" rather than a completely factual "memoir." <br /><br /><em>Beth Gaston Moon is an analyst at <a href="http://www.schaeffersresearch.com/">Schaeffer's Investment Research</a>.</em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/random-house-offers-refund-for-a-million-little-pieces/">Random House offers refund for "A Million Little Pieces"</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 18 May 2007 11:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/random-house-offers-refund-for-a-million-little-pieces/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/898998/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/18/random-house-offers-refund-for-a-million-little-pieces/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bertelsmann</category><category>books</category><category>james frey</category><category>JamesFrey</category><category>lawsuits</category><category>literature</category><category>memoirs</category><category>million little pieces</category><category>MillionLittlePieces</category><category>oprah winfrey</category><category>OprahWinfrey</category><category>publishing</category><category>Random House</category><category>RandomHouse</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Beth Gaston Moon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 11:45:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
