<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs Looking at an Image Makeover?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/22/goldman-sachs-looking-at-an-image-makeover/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/22/goldman-sachs-looking-at-an-image-makeover/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/22/goldman-sachs-looking-at-an-image-makeover/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gs/" rel="tag">Goldman Sachs Group (GS)</a></p><em><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/goldman-sachs-logo-240.jpg" />The Wall Street Journal</em> has been all over Goldman Sachs (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/the-goldman-sachs-group-inc/gs/nys" target="_blank">GS</a>) during the past couple of days. First the firm was <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704895204575320873417658124.html?mod=rss_whats_news_us" target="_blank">given an extension</a> to respond to the SEC's lawsuit involving disclosures concerning a collaterlized debt obligation related to subprime mortgages. The previous deadline for a response was Monday, but U.S. District Judge Barbara Jones gave GS until July 19 to answer the SEC. According to the SEC, GS did not tell investors that Paulson &amp; Co. helped select the underlying portfolio for a hedge fund. <p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/22/goldman-sachs-looking-at-an-image-makeover/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Goldman Sachs Looking at an Image Makeover?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/22/goldman-sachs-looking-at-an-image-makeover/">Goldman Sachs Looking at an Image Makeover?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 22 Jun 2010 15:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/22/goldman-sachs-looking-at-an-image-makeover/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19526406/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/22/goldman-sachs-looking-at-an-image-makeover/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>financial crisis</category><category>Goldman Sachs</category><category>inthenews</category><category>media</category><category>media coverage</category><category>Oprah</category><category>Oprah Winfrey</category><category>public relations</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 15:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Cheap Stocks: Amazon.com]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/07/cheap-stocks-amazon-com/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/07/cheap-stocks-amazon-com/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/07/cheap-stocks-amazon-com/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amzn/" rel="tag">Amazon.com (AMZN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sandp-500/" rel="tag">S and P 500</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><p><em><img  hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/cheap-stocks-amazon-com-200cs112608.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />This post is part of a series featuring bargain stocks that are worth a look now. See more <strong><a href="http://money.aol.com/investing/cheap-stocks">Cheap Stocks</a></strong>.</em></p>
<p>In my opinion, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas">Amazon.com</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas">AMZN</a>) has two major fundamental advantages. First, we're talking about a dot-com company that survived the dot-com bubble. This is an impressive achievement, on par with Julia Louis-Dreyfus finding success with a second sitcom after <em>Seinfeld</em>.</p>
<p>Second, I caught a bit of <em>Oprah</em> recently when I was home sick with a head cold. Her special guest was Amazon chief Jeff Bezos, and the topic of the day was how much Oprah loves the Kindle reader. Not only did everybody in the audience get a free Kindle, but Ms. Winfrey actually bellowed, "Kiiiinnnnnnnnn-<em>dullllllll</em>!" ("Thank you," stammered Bezos, no doubt overwhelmed by her all-powerful stamp of approval.)</p>
<p>Oprah aside, the key to Amazon's survival so far has been its willingness to adapt. What was once a humble online bookstore is now the internet equivalent of a general store -- on today's Amazon.com, you can pick up a new motherboard for your PC, a pair of winter boots, and a box of popcorn in one fell swoop. The company offers a slew of familiar brand names, which should make the site a popular stop for holiday shopping.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/07/cheap-stocks-amazon-com/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Cheap Stocks: Amazon.com</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/07/cheap-stocks-amazon-com/">Cheap Stocks: Amazon.com</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 07 Dec 2008 18:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/07/cheap-stocks-amazon-com/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1373345/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/07/cheap-stocks-amazon-com/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>amazon.com</category><category>amzn</category><category>cheap stocks</category><category>dot-com</category><category>eBay</category><category>Jeff Bezos</category><category>kindle</category><category>oprah</category><category>retail</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabeth Harrow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 18:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Oprah gushes on Amazon's Kindle reader]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/03/oprah-gushes-on-amazons-kindle-reader/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/03/oprah-gushes-on-amazons-kindle-reader/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/03/oprah-gushes-on-amazons-kindle-reader/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amzn/" rel="tag">Amazon.com (AMZN)</a></p><div id="imageResults" style="display: block;"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/11/oprah_evanagostini_getty_2006-11-22.jpg" alt="" />When Oprah speaks, America listens, and when she reads (God bless her!), Americans read, too. Thus her gush about <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas">Amazon</a>'s (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/amazon-com-inc/amzn/nas">AMZN</a>) electronic reader the Kindle has come as a blockbuster for the online merchant. </div>
<p>According to <a href="http://adage.com/digital/article?article_id=132194">Advertising Age</a>, as soon as Oprah mentioned the Kindle on her October 24th <a href="http://www.oprah.com/entity/oprahsbookclub">Oprah's Book Club</a>, Google searches on the term went up fivefold. Traffic directed to Amazon from Oprah.com went through the roof (15,000%) and the aggregate of all visits to Amazon were bumped up 6%, an enormous spike in a mature site. Given these numbers, her Kindle endorsement is a home run for the platform, and should drive huge Christmas sales. </p>
<p>Since Amazon spiffs referring sites 10% of the sale price, Oprah.com stands to rake in over $35 per Kindle sale. And, of course, this establishes the platform as a fulfillment alternative for each subsequent Oprah's book recommendation. Ka-ching!</p>
<br /><br /><!-- START SWF PUBLISHER Module: 267995 -->
<div id="swfpub_267995"> <script src='http://www.aolcdn.com/ke/swfobject/aol_swfobject.js' type='text/javascript' language='javascript' charset='utf-8'></script> <script src='http://www.aolcdn.com/ke/swfobject/alt_content.js' type='text/javascript' language='javascript' charset='utf-8'></script> <script src='http://www.aolcdn.com/ke/swfobject/aol_swfobject_helper.js' type='text/javascript' language='javascript' charset='utf-8'></script> <script src='http://www.aolcdn.com/ke/swfobject/ke_kit_refresh.js' type='text/javascript' language='javascript' charset='utf-8'></script> <script src='http://www.aolcdn.com/_media/modtools/swfpublisherproxy.js' type='text/javascript' language='javascript' charset='utf-8'></script> <script src='http://www.aolcdn.com/_media/channels/jfs_msgr.js' type='text/javascript' language='javascript' charset='utf-8'></script> <script src='http://www.aolcdn.com/_media//kegallerypub/ke_popup_456t.js' type='text/javascript' language='javascript' charset='utf-8'></script>  <script src='http://www.aolcdn.com/ke/swfobject/ke_kit_popup.js' type='text/javascript' language='javascript' charset='utf-8'></script>
<link href="http://www.aolcdn.com/_media//kegallerypub/photogallery_popup.css" type="text/css" rel="stylesheet" />
<link href="http://www.aolcdn.com/_media//kegallerypub/photogallery_popup_456t.css" type="text/css" rel="stylesheet" />
<div type="kex_010" name="money-oprah_winfrey-QU9MLkRBTEFKTw-v6" id="money-oprah_winfrey">
<div style="width: 618px; height: 600px;" id="money-oprah_winfrey-swf"> </div>
</div>
<script type='text/javascript' language='javascript' charset='utf-8'>
    soKe.flace('money-oprah_winfrey', '618', '600');

    var uid = new Date().getTime();
    var flashProxy = new FlashProxy(uid, 'http://www.aolcdn.com/_media/modtools/kit_swfpublisher_javascriptflashgateway.swf');

    var flashvars = {};
    try { flashvars.lcId = uid; } catch (Exc) { };
    try { flashvars.outlet_w = '618'; } catch (Exc) { };
    try { flashvars.outlet_h = '600'; } catch (Exc) { };
    try { flashvars.targetDivId = 'money-oprah_winfrey'; } catch (Exc) { };
    try { flashvars.targetAds = 'money-oprah_winfrey'; } catch (Exc) { };
    try { flashvars.omniture_tracker = '0'; } catch (Exc) { };
    try { flashvars.adrefresh_wrapper = '1'; } catch (Exc) { };
    try { flashvars.appswfURL = soKe.fv('http://xml.channel.aol.com/xmlpublisher/fetch.v2.xml?option=expand_relative_urls&amp;dataUrlNodes=uiConfig,feedConfig,entry&amp;id=405899&amp;pid=405898&amp;uts=1225822794'); } catch (Exc) { };
    
    if (typeof(screen_name) != 'undefined') try { flashvars.userName = screen_name; } catch (Exc) { };
    
    var params = {};
    try { params.wmode = 'opaque'; } catch (Exc) { };
    try { params.quality = 'best'; } catch (Exc) { };
    try { params.allowscriptaccess = 'always'; } catch (Exc) { };
    
    var attributes = {};
    try { attributes.id = 'outlet'; } catch (Exc) { };


    top.exd_space.refresher.ads2Refresh(new Array(
       'money-oprah_winfrey',
       new Array('93245070', '300', '250', '0')
    ));
    top.exd_space.refresher.iFrm2Refresh(new Array(
       'money-oprah_winfrey',
       new Array('Placement_ID', '1368391'),
       new Array('Domain_ID', '992772')
    ));

    top.exd_space.refresher.mmx('money-oprah_winfrey', 'http://www.aolcdn.com/_media/channels/ke_blank.html', '');


    swfobject.embedSWF('http://cdn.channel.aol.com/cs_feed_v1_6/csfeedwrapper.swf', 'money-oprah_winfrey-swf', '618', '600', '8.0.0', 'http://www.aolcdn.com/ke/swfobject/expressinstall.swf', flashvars, params, attributes);

    top.exd_space.refresher.launcher(
       'money-oprah_winfrey',{
       dynamicSlide:[''],
       size:['456t'],
       photoNumber:['0'],
       title:['Oprah Out and About'],
       numimages:['100'],
       baseImageURL:['http://o.aolcdn.com/photo-hub/'],
       imageurl:['AC78B022715C5B8357B4DCA8045E8463B4DE2124/People_Marion_Jones_Oprah_Winfrey.sff.jpg.281008154002_LR1.17696'],
       credit:['AP'],
       source:['Harpo Productions, Inc.'],
       caption:['In this photo released by Harpo Productions, Inc., former Olympic medalist Marion Jones, left, is shown with talk-show host Oprah Winfrey during taping of the &amp;#34;The Oprah Winfrey Show,&amp;#34; in Chicago on Oct. 24, 2008. Jones&amp;#39; appearance on the show airing Wednesday, Oct. 29 will be the disgraced track star&amp;#39;s first interview since she was released Sept. 5 from a Texas federal prison after completing most of her six-month sentence for lying about steroid use. (AP Photo/Harpo Productions, George Burns) **NO SALES, MANDATORY CREDIT: Harpo Productions, George Burns**'],
       dims:['http://o.aolcdn.com/dims/PGMC/5/365/269/70/'],
       showDisclaimerText:[''],
       disclaimerText:[''],
       CSS_Title:['#333333'],
       CSS_Caption:['#333333'],
       CSS_Disclaimer:['#333333'],
       CSS_Container:['#ffffff'],
       CSS_Border:[''],
       CSS_PhotoWell:['#ffffff'],
       CSS_photoHolder:[''],
       CSS_Buttons:['#2ea359'],
       CSS_BtnOver:['#1c7f40'],
       CSS_Scroll:[''],
       topMargin:['21,0,365,269,408,269,0,0']
       }
    );

</script>  </div>
<!-- END SWF PUBLISHER -->  <br />
<p>According to Wikipedia, publishers believe Oprah has 20 to 100 times the sway of any other public figure in driving book sales. For example, a recent announcement that she selected <em>The Story of Edgar Sawtelle</em> by David Wroblewski inspired the publisher to order a run of<a href="http://www.time.com/time/arts/article/0,8599,1844724,00.html"> 750,000 copies</a>. Each one carrying the Oprah selection tag was given its own ISBN to track her impact. </p>
<p>Also read:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/08/25/amazon-to-take-kindle-into-the-textbook-market/">Amazon vies for schoolbook market with Kindle</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/06/03/amazons-kindle-continues-to-attract-book-titles/">Amazon builds appealing list of Kindle titles</a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/03/oprah-gushes-on-amazons-kindle-reader/">Oprah gushes on Amazon's Kindle reader</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 03 Nov 2008 14:33:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/03/oprah-gushes-on-amazons-kindle-reader/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1360401/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/11/03/oprah-gushes-on-amazons-kindle-reader/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>amazon</category><category>AMZN</category><category>digital fiction</category><category>digital reading</category><category>DigitalFiction</category><category>DigitalReading</category><category>electronic readers</category><category>ElectronicReaders</category><category>inthenews</category><category>kindle</category><category>oprah</category><category>oprahs book club</category><category>OprahsBookClub</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Barlow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 14:33:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bear Stearns going too cheap, Oprah Winfrey should buy it]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/19/bear-stearns-going-too-cheap-oprah-winfrey-should-buy-it/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/19/bear-stearns-going-too-cheap-oprah-winfrey-should-buy-it/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/19/bear-stearns-going-too-cheap-oprah-winfrey-should-buy-it/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/jpm/" rel="tag">JPMorgan Chase (JPM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bsc/" rel="tag">Bear Stearns Cos (BSC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-sell/" rel="tag">Stocks to Sell</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="Oprah Winfrey " src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/oprah-winfrey.jpg" />At a mere $276 million, celebrity talk-show host and entertainment billionaire Oprah Winfrey could afford to buy <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-bear-stearns-companies-inc/bsc/nys">Bear Stearns</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-bear-stearns-companies-inc/bsc/nys">BSC</a>), which closed Tuesday at $5.91 per share and keeps on climbing to over $6.50 a share in morning trading. The story alone and the associated publicity would be worth at least that. Furthermore, she could at least make an offer and demand a meeting with the Federal Reserve Board to discuss the issue.</p>
<p>If her offer was rejected, she would still be able to generate millions of dollars of publicity and perhaps she might want to acquire the asset, in particular if the Fed is going to protect the acquirer from potential losses. She could really become an international mogul, the likes of which has not been seen. We all know that Oprah wants to do good. She is so giving, this could be the ultimate.</p>
<p>I could just see the headlines: <em>Oprah Winfrey takes on </em><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jp-morgan-chase-and-co/jpm/nys?tabs=quotesandnews"><em>JP Morgan Chase</em></a><em> (NYSE: </em><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/jp-morgan-chase-and-co/jpm/nys?tabs=quotesandnews"><em>JPM</em></a><em>) and the Federal Reserve to rescue John Q. Public.</em></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/19/bear-stearns-going-too-cheap-oprah-winfrey-should-buy-it/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Bear Stearns going too cheap, Oprah Winfrey should buy it</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/19/bear-stearns-going-too-cheap-oprah-winfrey-should-buy-it/">Bear Stearns going too cheap, Oprah Winfrey should buy it</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:52:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.nypost.com/seven/03192008/business/bear_hunting_102536.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/19/bear-stearns-going-too-cheap-oprah-winfrey-should-buy-it/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1143871/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/19/bear-stearns-going-too-cheap-oprah-winfrey-should-buy-it/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>bear stearns</category><category>BearStearns</category><category>BSC</category><category>chase</category><category>featured</category><category>Federal Reserve</category><category>FederalReserve</category><category>George Lucas</category><category>GeorgeLucas</category><category>Jimmy Cayne</category><category>JimmyCayne</category><category>Joseph Lewis</category><category>JosephLewis</category><category>jp morgan</category><category>JPM</category><category>JpMorgan</category><category>jpmorganchase</category><category>Michael Jordan</category><category>MichaelJordan</category><category>oprah</category><category>oprah winfrey</category><category>oprah's big give</category><category>Oprah'sBigGive</category><category>OprahWinfrey</category><category>Skywalker Ranch</category><category>Steven Spielberg</category><category>StevenSpielberg</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sheldon Liber]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:52:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Oprah's enlightenment quest hits a technological snag]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/04/oprahs-enlightenment-quest-hits-a-technological-snag/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/04/oprahs-enlightenment-quest-hits-a-technological-snag/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/04/oprahs-enlightenment-quest-hits-a-technological-snag/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amzn/" rel="tag">Amazon.com (AMZN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xmsr/" rel="tag">XM Satellite Radio (XMSR)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/books/" rel="tag">Books</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="Oprah Winfrey " src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/oprah-winfrey.jpg" />If Oprah Winfrey can cast a spell that turns thousands of housewives into literature critics and transformed underdog Barack Obama into the possible Democratic nominee for president, getting her followers to embrace an esoteric New Age philosophy should be a snap. Her latest endeavor, though, is going to need more bandwidth.
<p>The talk show queen is getting into the business of enlightenment, offering a 10-week Web seminar with self-help guru Eckhart Tolle, author of "A New Earth," an amalgam of Buddhist, Christian and Islamic influences, according to<a href="http://www.usatoday.com/life/people/2008-03-02-oprah-tolle_N.htm"> USA Today</a>. The book also happens to be the latest pick of Oprah's Book Club. </p>
<p>Last night's first webcast was one of the largest events in the history of the internet, attracting more than 500,000 people. "Unfortunately, some of our users experienced delays in viewing the webcast," according to a <a href="http://www2.oprah.com/about/press/releases/200803/press_releases_20080304.jhtml">statement from Oprah's Harpo Productions</a>. "We are working to identify the specific causes for the problems experienced and will work diligently to rectify them." </p>
<p> Seekers of enlightenment be forewarned, the path outlined by "A New Earth" isn't an easy one.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/04/oprahs-enlightenment-quest-hits-a-technological-snag/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Oprah's enlightenment quest hits a technological snag</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/04/oprahs-enlightenment-quest-hits-a-technological-snag/">Oprah's enlightenment quest hits a technological snag</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 04 Mar 2008 15:08:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/04/oprahs-enlightenment-quest-hits-a-technological-snag/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1131153/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/04/oprahs-enlightenment-quest-hits-a-technological-snag/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>A New Earth</category><category>ANewEarth</category><category>Eckhart Tolle</category><category>EckhartTolle</category><category>Oprah</category><category>Oprah Winfrey</category><category>Oprah's Book Club</category><category>Oprah'sBookClub</category><category>OprahWinfrey</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 15:08:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Oprah Effect works for business books too -- especially when they're free]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/17/oprah-effect-works-for-business-books-too-especially-when-the/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/17/oprah-effect-works-for-business-books-too-especially-when-the/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/17/oprah-effect-works-for-business-books-too-especially-when-the/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/books/" rel="tag">Books</a></p><p>Since the announcement on Oprah's television program that Suze Orman's financial advice book <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/free-business-book-is-web-sensation/n20080216113509990012"><em>Money &amp; Women</em> would be available for free</a> as an e-book from Oprah.com, more than a million copies in English have been downloaded, as well as an additional 19,000 in Spanish, according to a statement released Saturday. This puts it the same league as such other free download sensations as the <em>9-11 Commission Report</em> and Stephen King's "Riding the Bullet."</p>
<p>Yet, the offer hasn't kept people from buying the version of <em>Money &amp; Women</em> published by a division of Random House last year. The book was ranked number 6 on Amazon on Saturday, behind Oprah Book Club selection <em>A New Earth</em> and just ahead of Barack Obama's <em>The</em> <em>Audacity of Hope</em>. The <em>9-11 Commission Report</em> remained a bestseller for months despite its availability for free online.</p>
<p>The big publishers remain skeptical about providing content for free online. While some see it as a valuable marketing tool, others suspect that it harms sales of traditional books. But the tide may be turning, albeit in baby steps. HarperCollins has announced plans to make available <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/11/business/media/11harper.html?ref=business">free electronic versions of some of its books</a>, or portions thereof, the <em>New York Times</em> reported last week. They will not be downloadable, however.</p>
<p>Providing some free content is "like taking the shrink wrap off a book," said a spokesperson for HarperCollins, which will allow consumers to sample the content. "I didn't grow up buying every book I read," added fantasy novelist Neil Gaiman, author of some of the free content. "I read books at libraries, I read books at friend's houses, I read books that I found on people's window sills."</p>
<p>Suze Orman suggests that sales are a secondary concern for her in the Oprah offer. "This was not about getting people to buy the book, but getting them to read it, and that was the intention behind this offer." <br /></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/17/oprah-effect-works-for-business-books-too-especially-when-the/">Oprah Effect works for business books too -- especially when they're free</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 17 Feb 2008 10:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/17/oprah-effect-works-for-business-books-too-especially-when-the/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1116906/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/17/oprah-effect-works-for-business-books-too-especially-when-the/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>e-books</category><category>free books</category><category>HarperCollins</category><category>inthenews</category><category>Money and Women</category><category>Neil Gaiman</category><category>Oprah</category><category>Oprah Book Club</category><category>Oprah.com</category><category>Random House</category><category>Suze Orman</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trey Thoelcke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 10:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Best &amp; Worst of 2007: Most overpaid celebrities]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/01/best-and-worst-of-2007-most-overpaid-celebrities/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/01/best-and-worst-of-2007-most-overpaid-celebrities/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/01/best-and-worst-of-2007-most-overpaid-celebrities/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/entrepreneurs/" rel="tag">Entrepreneurs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a></p><p><em><iframe align="left" src="http://webcenter.polls.aol.com/modular.jsp?template=1512&amp;view=127258&amp;pollId=127358&amp;channel=aol_us_personalfinance&amp;popup=yes" frameborder="0" width="229" scrolling="no" height="190"></iframe>This post was part of AOL Money &amp; Finance's </em><em><a href="http://money.aol.com/special/best-and-worst-2007"><strong>Best &amp; Worst of 2007</strong></a> feature</em><em>. Voting has now closed and readers have chosen <strong><a href="http://money.aol.com/special/best-and-worst-2007/winners">Oprah Winfrey</a> </strong>as the most overpaid celebrity of the year.</em><em> Be sure to let us know in the comments if you are pleased with this result.</em></p>
<p><img alt="Most overpaid celebrities " hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/bw-07-186-overpaid-celebrity-cs112007.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Oprah Winfrey returns to our Most Overpaid Celebrity category after having lost the title to <a href="http://money.aol.com/best-and-worst-in-money-2006/most-overpaid-celebrity">Paris Hilton last year</a>. For 2007 she is joined by overpaid celebrities Madonna, George Lopez, and Russell Crowe.</p>
<p>Winfrey, Madonna, and Lopez all made the <a href="http://www.forbes.com/2007/06/14/best-paid-celebrities-07celebrities_cz_lg_0614celeb_land.html"><em>Forbes</em> Celebrity 100</a>, a ranking of Hollywood players by pay, influence, and popularity. Winfrey, of course, comes in at number one, both in terms of pay and power. Madonna's earnings placed her at number nine on the list, while Lopez came in at number fifty-one.</p>
<p><em>Forbes</em> estimates <a href="http://www.forbes.com/lists/2007/53/07celebrities_Oprah-Winfrey_O0ZT.html">Winfrey's earnings at $260 million</a> last year, and her net worth in the area of $1.5 billion, making her the nation's wealthiest African American. She'll be adding two new reality shows to her media empire, which already includes a blockbuster daytime talk show, satellite radio show, magazine, and Broadway musical, as well as stakes in hit shows by Dr. Phil McGraw and Rachael Ray. The school for girls she founded in South Africa has drawn much media attention this year, and she's recently endorsed Barack Obama's presidential campaign. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oprah_Winfrey#Wealth">Winfrey has been called</a> the world's most powerful woman, the most influential woman in the world, one of the most influential persons of the 20th century, the world's first black woman billionaire, and the greatest pop culture icon of all time. Can any mortal person live up to all that hype?</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/01/best-and-worst-of-2007-most-overpaid-celebrities/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Best &amp; Worst of 2007: Most overpaid celebrities</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/01/best-and-worst-of-2007-most-overpaid-celebrities/">Best &amp; Worst of 2007: Most overpaid celebrities</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 01 Dec 2007 17:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/01/best-and-worst-of-2007-most-overpaid-celebrities/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1045900/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/01/best-and-worst-of-2007-most-overpaid-celebrities/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>3:10 from Yuma</category><category>American Gangster</category><category>Andy Garcia</category><category>Barack Obama</category><category>Best and Worst 2007</category><category>Bob Hope Chrysler Classic</category><category>box office</category><category>celebrities</category><category>Celebrity 100</category><category>Dr. Phil</category><category>George Lopez</category><category>Hollywood</category><category>Kevin Costner</category><category>Luke Wilson</category><category>Madonna</category><category>Matt Damon</category><category>Most Overpaid Celebrity</category><category>Oprah</category><category>Paris Hilton</category><category>PGA</category><category>Rachel Ray</category><category>Russell Crowe</category><category>Sandra Bullock</category><category>Ultimate Star Payback</category><category>Warner Bros., Live Nation</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trey Thoelcke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 17:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Oprah has left the building: NBC Universal (GE) buys Oxygen Media]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/09/oprah-has-left-the-building-nbc-universal-ge-buys-oxygen-medi/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/09/oprah-has-left-the-building-nbc-universal-ge-buys-oxygen-medi/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/09/oprah-has-left-the-building-nbc-universal-ge-buys-oxygen-medi/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/film/" rel="tag">Film</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/oxygen.jpg" alt="Oh! Oxygen Media logo" />Call it "Girls Gone Mild." In 2000, Geraldine Laybourne, the former president of the Nickelodeon network for children, and Oprah Winfrey, who needs no introduction, got together to launch a media empire focused on women -- called Oxygen. The idea was to create synergies between TV and the internet. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Microsoft Corp</a>. (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/microsoft-corporation/msft/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">MSFT</a>) founder Paul Allen liked the idea enough he helped back the venture. <br /><br />But the dreams never matched the reality. The sexiness of the idea -- a woman's media empire! -- never lived up to its potential. And today, NBC, a unit of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys">General Electric</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/general-electric-company/ge/nys"> GE</a>), announced that it <a href="http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/10/09/nbc-to-buy-oxygen-for-925-million-2/">would buy Oxygen Media for $925 million.</a><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/09/oprah-has-left-the-building-nbc-universal-ge-buys-oxygen-medi/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Oprah has left the building: NBC Universal (GE) buys Oxygen Media</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/09/oprah-has-left-the-building-nbc-universal-ge-buys-oxygen-medi/">Oprah has left the building: NBC Universal (GE) buys Oxygen Media</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 09 Oct 2007 20:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/10/09/nbc-to-buy-oxygen-for-925-million-2/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/09/oprah-has-left-the-building-nbc-universal-ge-buys-oxygen-medi/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1009334/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/09/oprah-has-left-the-building-nbc-universal-ge-buys-oxygen-medi/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>GE</category><category>Geraldine Laybourne</category><category>GeraldineLaybourne</category><category>MSFT</category><category>NBC</category><category>Oprah</category><category>Oxygen Media</category><category>OxygenMedia</category><category>Paul Allen</category><category>PaulAllen</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Julie Tilsner]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 20:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Money Face-Off: Oprah Winfrey vs. Martha Stewart]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-oprah-winfrey-vs-martha-stewart/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-oprah-winfrey-vs-martha-stewart/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-oprah-winfrey-vs-martha-stewart/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/entrepreneurs/" rel="tag">Entrepreneurs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mso/" rel="tag">Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia (MSO)</a></p><p><em>This post is part of our <strong><a href="http://money.aol.com/investing/money-face-off-business-superstars">Money Face-Offs</a></strong> feature. Let us know who you think comes out ahead in this head-to-head match-up, and check out our other Money Face-Off posts.</em></p>
<p><em><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/face-off-240-media-ladies-oprah-cs091207.jpg" alt="" />Celebrities -- they're more than superior human beings, they're money-making machines. If these celebrities were stocks, which would be the shrewd buy?</em></p>
<p>One sure sign of celebrity is first-name recognition, and today's contestants have certainly reached that pinnacle. Oprah and Martha are brands known worldwide, Oprah for compassion and wisdom, Martha for style and elegance.</p>
<p>Martha Stewart's brand is still tainted by her 2004 insider trading conviction and her stretch in Camp Cupcake. Before then, <a href="http://www.answers.com/martha+stewart?cat=biz-fin">her growth from model and stockbroker to America's favorite lifestyle celebrity</a> was impressive. After authoring the bestselling book <em>Entertaining</em> in 1979, she transitioned to television with her hit show <em>Martha Stewart Living</em>, for which she gathered several Emmys. In 1987, she inked a lucrative deal with d&eacute;class&eacute; retailer Kmart as a lifestyle consultant, to help it break into higher price-point retailing. In 1990, with <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Time Warner</a> (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">TWX</a>) she launched <em>Martha Stewart Living Magazine</em>. The zenith of her career came in 1997 when she took herself public. The IPO for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/martha-stewart-living-omnimedia-inc/mso/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/martha-stewart-living-omnimedia-inc/mso/nys?tabs=quotesandnews">MSO</a>) made her a billionaire.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-oprah-winfrey-vs-martha-stewart/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Money Face-Off: Oprah Winfrey vs. Martha Stewart</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-oprah-winfrey-vs-martha-stewart/">Money Face-Off: Oprah Winfrey vs. Martha Stewart</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 15 Sep 2007 09:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-oprah-winfrey-vs-martha-stewart/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/979942/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/15/money-face-off-oprah-winfrey-vs-martha-stewart/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>billionaire women</category><category>billionaires</category><category>celebrities</category><category>Color Purple</category><category>expire-images:2008-9-14</category><category>featured</category><category>Harpo Productions</category><category>martha</category><category>martha stewart</category><category>Martha Stewart Living</category><category>mso</category><category>oprah</category><category>oprah winfrey</category><category>television stars</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TWX</category><category>women entrepenuers</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Barlow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 09:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[What moms really want: Stop the junk mail!]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/08/what-moms-really-want-stop-the-junk-mail/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/08/what-moms-really-want-stop-the-junk-mail/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/08/what-moms-really-want-stop-the-junk-mail/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tif/" rel="tag">Tiffany and Co (TIF)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cost/" rel="tag">Costco Wholesale (COST)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/entrepreneurs/" rel="tag">Entrepreneurs</a></p>Just in time for Mother's Day, direct marketers have swamped my mailbox.<br /><br /> In the last week or so junk mail targeting Mom has piled up. There's a <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/costco-wholesale-corporation/cost/nas">Costco Wholesale Corp.'s</a> (NASDAQ:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/costco-wholesale-corporation/cost/nas"> COST</a>) magazine with a story titled Mom Inc. on the cover. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/tiffany-and-co-new/tif/nys">Tiffany &amp; Co</a>. (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/tiffany-and-co-new/tif/nys">TIF</a>) is selling some lovely trinkets between baby blue covers. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/1-800-flowers-com-inc-cl-a/flws/nas">1-800-flowers.com, Inc.</a>(NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/1-800-flowers-com-inc-cl-a/flws/nas">FLWS</a>) has a catalog full of roses, chocolate and other things that "Mom wants." The local taxidermist even sent me a coupon for a deal on moose stuffing (this is Alaska) for the special day.  <br /><br />Is it my imagination or has the amount of junk mail increased? <br /><br />It's up. In 2006 companies sent more than 114 billion direct -mail pieces. That's about 15% more than five years earlier, according to the United States Postal Service. The Postal Service and I don't see eye to eye when it comes to credit card offers, coupons and bulky catalogs. The federal agency loves direct mailers because they generate big bucks for the service. It even has a magazine, Deliver, whose mission is to help direct mailers find faster, better ways to my mailbox, and wallet. In 2006, for the first time ever, the volume of bulk mail, which is another name for direct mail, exceeded all first class. <br /><br />But there is a fledging company taking on the Postal Service and the giants of direct marketing. Hollywood celebrity <a href="http://www.oprah.com/tows/slide/200704/20070420/slide_20070420_350_106.jhtml">Matt Damon sits on its board</a>  <a href="http://www.greendimes.com/">Greendimes.com</a> will take your name off direct mail lists, unwanted credit card solicitations, and the dozens or hundreds of catalogs that arrive yearly. It will keep tabs on direct marketers to keep you off the lists and even plant a tree for you every month, but not on your property. The cost: $36 a year. <br /><br />Sounds like a good gift for Mom. It's a lot less than diamonds from Tiffany's. Or a stuffed moose.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/08/what-moms-really-want-stop-the-junk-mail/">What moms really want: Stop the junk mail!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 08 May 2007 16:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/08/what-moms-really-want-stop-the-junk-mail/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/891465/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/08/what-moms-really-want-stop-the-junk-mail/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>COST</category><category>direct mail</category><category>DirectMail</category><category>FLWS</category><category>Mother's Day</category><category>Mother'sDay</category><category>Oprah</category><category>TIF</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Weld Royal]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 16:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Oprah supports Obama for President]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/07/oprah-supports-obama-for-president/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/07/oprah-supports-obama-for-president/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/07/oprah-supports-obama-for-president/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xmsr/" rel="tag">XM Satellite Radio (XMSR)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/presidential-elections/" rel="tag">Presidential Elections</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/headline-news/" rel="tag">Headline News</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/05/oprah57.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />Senator Barack Obama received a huge endorsement to his campaign last week from <a href="http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/05/03/oprah-endorses-obama-2/">Oprah Winfrey.</a> If you question the power of her endorsement, I would point out that she recently convinced millions of Americans to read <em>As I Lay Dying</em> by William Faulkner. Only parting the Red Sea would have been a greater miracle.<br /><br />The advantages to Obama of having Oprah on his side are wide-ranging, and start with the good will his brand gains by its association with hers. In a recent <a href="http://publications.mediapost.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=44755">Celebrity Trust Index</a> compiled by Davie-Brown Talent, Oprah and Tom Hanks were named as the most trustworthy celebrities. And the most trend-setting? Oprah, again. To people impressed with wealth, <a href="http://www.forbes.com/finance/lists/54/2004/LIR.jhtml?passListId=54&amp;passYear=2004&amp;passListType=Person&amp;uniqueId=O0ZT&amp;datatype=Person">her $1.3 billion</a> will speak volumes.<br /><br />Add this extraordinary good will to her market penetration, and Obama couldn't ask for a better supporter. Oprah is best known for her daily talk show, but she also hosts the daily <em>Oprah &amp; Friends</em> radio show on <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/xm-satellite-radio-holdings-inc/xmsr/nas">XM Satellite Radio Holdings Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/xm-satellite-radio-holdings-inc/xmsr/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">XMSR</a>), publishes <em>O, the Oprah Magazine</em>, and works the Internet through <a href="http://www2.oprah.com/index.jhtml">Oprah.com.<br /></a><br />Her presence should benefit Obama several ways. It will certainly help with fund raising, both from Oprah's audience and those bandwagon riders who see her endorsement as legitimizing his prospects.</p>
<p>Obama has, surprisingly, received <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/24/AR2007012402032.html">lukewarm support from the African-American community,</a> and this endorsement should elevate his stature in that demographic. Traditionally, Democrats benefit from large vote turnout, and he could benefit if Oprah uses her bully pulpit to inspire a strong get-out-the-vote movement. <br /><br />Best of all, by announcing for Obama, Oprah has eliminated Obama's greatest threat as a potential candidate: Oprah herself. What a candidate she would be!</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/07/oprah-supports-obama-for-president/">Oprah supports Obama for President</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 07 May 2007 11:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/05/03/oprah-endorses-obama-2/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/07/oprah-supports-obama-for-president/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/890291/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/05/07/oprah-supports-obama-for-president/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2008 presidential campaign</category><category>2008PresidentialCampaign</category><category>barak obama</category><category>BarakObama</category><category>celebrity endorsement</category><category>CelebrityEndorsement</category><category>oprah</category><category>oprah and obama</category><category>oprah endorsement'</category><category>oprah winfrey</category><category>OprahAndObama</category><category>OprahEndorsement'</category><category>OprahWinfrey</category><category>xmsr</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Barlow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 11:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Businesswomen I envy: it's not always their money]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/08/businesswomen-i-envy-its-not-always-their-money/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/08/businesswomen-i-envy-its-not-always-their-money/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/08/businesswomen-i-envy-its-not-always-their-money/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/03/maria_bartiromo_evanagostini_getty_160.jpg" />I have been clicking along through <a href="http://money.aol.com/forbes/general/richest-women-billioniares"><em>Forbes</em>' "Billionaire Women We Envy" list</a> and finding very little to which I related. Sure, Oprah's on my list, but not because she's a billionaire so much. And I started thinking... what is it, really, that I envy? Because envy is far, far from admiration. It's a whole other category. Who do I envy, and why?<br /><br />When I saw the headline, before I even clicked further, I thought "Maria Bartiromo." She doesn't even make <em>Forbes</em>' cutoff -- she's not a billionaire, for starters. But if there's anyone I envy, it's Maria, she of the smoky eyes and the men in powerful places who do stupid, stupid things for her.<br /><br />What do women envy of other women? It's not their money, at least, not for me. It's their power, their fame, their ability to juggle family and career. And most of all it's their ability to manipulate others without seeming manipulative at all. It's the Money Honey, able to move markets with a bat of her dark eyelashes.<br /><br />If I was to create a list of the women most worthy of a female MBA's envy, here's who would be on it:<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/08/businesswomen-i-envy-its-not-always-their-money/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Businesswomen I envy: it's not always their money</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/08/businesswomen-i-envy-its-not-always-their-money/">Businesswomen I envy: it's not always their money</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 08 Mar 2007 04:50:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/08/businesswomen-i-envy-its-not-always-their-money/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/847894/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/08/businesswomen-i-envy-its-not-always-their-money/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>admire</category><category>bartiromo</category><category>envy</category><category>forbes</category><category>maria</category><category>oprah</category><category>oprah winfrey</category><category>OprahWinfrey</category><category>women</category><category>women i admire</category><category>women i envy</category><category>women in business</category><category>WomenIAdmire</category><category>WomenIEnvy</category><category>WomenInBusiness</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 04:50:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Best &amp; Worst: The Donald as hair icon]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/06/best-and-worst-the-donald-as-hair-icon/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/06/best-and-worst-the-donald-as-hair-icon/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/06/best-and-worst-the-donald-as-hair-icon/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/trmp/" rel="tag">Trump Entertainment Resorts (TRMP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/best-and-worst-2006/" rel="tag">Best and Worst 2006</a></p><p class="MsoNormal"><em><img id="vimage_1" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/12/favorite-worst-signature-style-look-200a120106.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />This post is written as part of AOL Money &amp; Finance's Best &amp; Worst 2006. You can vote for Donald Trump's hair as the <a href="http://money.aol.com/best-and-worst-in-money-2006/worst-signature-style">Worst Signature Style</a>. </em><br /></p>
<p>Good Mr. Trump, he of the fluffy comb-over, had a heck of a year in 2006. We should all be so lucky (he would ascribe luck to none of it, of course, but that is another matter)!</p>
<p>Just a few of his accomplishments:</p>
<ul>
    <li>The Iconic Donald saw his net worth rise again above a mere <strong>five billion dollars</strong>. </li>
    <li>He is erecting buildings all over the world, including a Trump Tower in Dubai. The Hair is literally global. </li>
    <li>He married a stunning model, half his age, and fathered a lovely son whom he subtly named Baron. He has stated for the record that he does not and will not change the baby's diapers. </li>
    <li>His television show, <em>The Apprentice,</em> is literally one of the top-rated shows in television. To demonstrate that his Trumpian blood line lives on, he fired his firm professionals from the show and put both of his genetically perfect children on camera alongside him. And they are articulate and on the ball, like pop. </li>
    <li>To put a capper on his TV dominance he put a smack down on his "friend" and <em>Apprentice </em>ing&eacute;nue, Martha Stewart, when she attempted her own show and talked down the D-man. Nobody does that! Wonder how he handles his enemies when they cross him? </li>
</ul>
<p>And now, at year end, he is giving foreign-policy style speeches and musing about running for president. And like our current president, the Donald does not drink alcohol. No wonder he is always so crisp. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/06/best-and-worst-the-donald-as-hair-icon/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Best &amp; Worst: The Donald as hair icon</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/06/best-and-worst-the-donald-as-hair-icon/">Best &amp; Worst: The Donald as hair icon</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 06 Dec 2006 18:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/06/best-and-worst-the-donald-as-hair-icon/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/710285/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/06/best-and-worst-the-donald-as-hair-icon/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Baron Trump</category><category>Donald Trump</category><category>DonaldTrump</category><category>Frederic Fekkai</category><category>FredericFekkai</category><category>George Clooney</category><category>Lance Armstrong</category><category>LanceArmstrong</category><category>Madonna</category><category>Martha Stewart</category><category>Oprah</category><category>Prince</category><category>The Apprentice</category><category>The Donald</category><category>Trump Tower</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Rickertsen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 18:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Oprah's 'Pay it Forward' show costly for audience: charity doesn't begin on TV]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/24/oprahs-pay-it-forward-show-costly-for-audience-charity-doesn/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/24/oprahs-pay-it-forward-show-costly-for-audience-charity-doesn/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/24/oprahs-pay-it-forward-show-costly-for-audience-charity-doesn/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a></p>I <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/22/will-you-pay-it-forward-with-oprah-or-rely-on-good-ol-consump/">wondered on Wednesday about Oprah's</a> so-called <a href="http://money.aol.com/cnnmoney/general/canvas3/_a/oprah-ditches-favorite-things-in-favor/20061115124109990001">"Pay it Forward" show</a>, where she gave audience members $1000 debit cards, loaned them video cameras, and told them to go out and do good works in a much-ballyhoed <a href="http://money.aol.com/cnnmoney/general/canvas3/_a/oprahs-favorite-things-a-blessing-and-a/20061122115409990001">replacement for her "favorite things"</a> holiday show. So charitable, I thought.<br /><br />And then the <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/22/will-you-pay-it-forward-with-oprah-or-rely-on-good-ol-consump/#comments">comments started coming</a>.<br /><br />Audience members were asked to come back for the wrap-up show at their own expense. And they did, expecting (it seems) that their difficult journeys of giving back would be featured. Everybody loves a little fame, or at least thanks, for their efforts. And, let's face it, if Oprah asked you to film something you'd done, and then come back to the show, wouldn't you come? Of course you would.<br /><br />Except that, once back in the studio audience, only a very few of the audience members' stories were told. The audience was also informed they couldn't keep the video cameras -- the tax burden would be too much (despite, as some commenters mentioned, the fact that the expense to return to Chicago for the taping was many times greater than any tax burden). Those who wrote in weren't so upset that their exploits went unwatched (despite the fact that they'd worked very hard to execute and record the tale of their response to Oprah's challenge) -- they were more hurt that the producers asked them all back without mentioning which clips would be shown. As Connie Miller said, "When the producers called the audience to return they should have informed them that their particular stories were not going to be highlighted so they could choose to get a pat on the back from Oprah from home and not pay additional funds to come back."<br /><br />The final injury? When the audience members were in the waiting room, the producers played reels of past "Favorite Things" shows, so the charitable and entirely gift-free viewers could see the delight as audience members of years past discovered free gift ... after free gift ... after free gift.<br /><br />Sheesh. At least give them a pashmina shawl, Oprah!<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/24/oprahs-pay-it-forward-show-costly-for-audience-charity-doesn/">Oprah's 'Pay it Forward' show costly for audience: charity doesn't begin on TV</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 24 Nov 2006 16:12:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/24/oprahs-pay-it-forward-show-costly-for-audience-charity-doesn/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/707247/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/24/oprahs-pay-it-forward-show-costly-for-audience-charity-doesn/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>favorite things</category><category>favorite things show</category><category>FavoriteThings</category><category>FavoriteThingsShow</category><category>oprah</category><category>oprah favorite things</category><category>oprah pay it forward</category><category>oprah winfrey</category><category>oprah winfrey favorite things</category><category>oprah winfrey pay it forward</category><category>OprahFavoriteThings</category><category>OprahPayItForward</category><category>OprahWinfrey</category><category>OprahWinfreyFavoriteThings</category><category>OprahWinfreyPayItForward</category><category>pay it forward</category><category>pay it forward show</category><category>PayItForward</category><category>PayItForwardShow</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 16:12:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Will you 'pay it forward' with Oprah or rely on good ol' consumption?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/22/will-you-pay-it-forward-with-oprah-or-rely-on-good-ol-consump/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/22/will-you-pay-it-forward-with-oprah-or-rely-on-good-ol-consump/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/22/will-you-pay-it-forward-with-oprah-or-rely-on-good-ol-consump/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" alt="oprah winfrey" id="vimage_1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/11/oprah_evanagostini_getty_2006-11-22.jpg" />Oprah, Oprah, Oprah. We've always relied on you as the doyenne of spendy gifts, the queen of conspicious consumption. It was you, every year, who announced your "favorites" with much fanfare and fabulous giveaways to your adoring audience (and who wouldn't adore you, with your sponsorship-fueled generosity?).<br /><br />But this year, you've betrayed the capitalist in us all. You've really gone and done it this time. <a href="http://money.aol.com/cnnmoney/general/canvas3/_a/oprah-ditches-favorite-things-in-favor/20061115124109990001">You've told us to give to charities, not buy things</a>. Huh?<br /><br />Oh, sure, I'm all for philathropy. But I don't expect this of Oprah. Consumers everywhere are relying on her for her wisdom in selecting the must-have gifts for the holiday. Small, artsy and luxe companies <a href="http://money.aol.com/cnnmoney/general/canvas3/_a/oprahs-favorite-things-a-blessing-and-a/20061122115409990001">rely on her (or fear her, as the case may be)</a> to send stacks and gigabytes of orders their way, with a "must-deliver" date of December 24th.<br /><br />Not this year. This year, you're supposed to use your spare cash (and the $1000 debit card, if you were in her audience during the October taping of Oprah's "Pay it Forward" show) to do good works.<br /><br />I'm all for charity, but I don't see it as a replacement for giving things. I may sometimes interpret the "things" in a different way than Oprah ever did, choosing to give hand-made gifts, books, photographs, scores from the thrift stores, and other slightly less conspicuous examples of consumption. But holiday shopping is inviolate ... I'll wait 'til December 30th or so and <em>then</em> get into the selflessly charitable spirit. Will you follow Oprah's lead, or stick with the pretty-and-tangible things this holiday season?<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/22/will-you-pay-it-forward-with-oprah-or-rely-on-good-ol-consump/">Will you 'pay it forward' with Oprah or rely on good ol' consumption?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:03:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/22/will-you-pay-it-forward-with-oprah-or-rely-on-good-ol-consump/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/706471/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/11/22/will-you-pay-it-forward-with-oprah-or-rely-on-good-ol-consump/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>charity</category><category>favorites</category><category>gifts</category><category>giving</category><category>holiday</category><category>oprah</category><category>oprah winfrey</category><category>oprah's favorites</category><category>Oprah'sFavorites</category><category>OprahWinfrey</category><category>pay it forward</category><category>PayItForward</category><category>tv</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Sirius and XM leveling off: but Howard Stern effect is real]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/03/sirius-and-xm-leveling-off-but-howard-stern-effect-is-real/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/03/sirius-and-xm-leveling-off-but-howard-stern-effect-is-real/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/03/sirius-and-xm-leveling-off-but-howard-stern-effect-is-real/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xmsr/" rel="tag">XM Satellite Radio (XMSR)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/siri/" rel="tag">Sirius Satellite Radio (SIRI)</a></p><img id="vimage_1" height="245" alt="Howard Stern with Logo T-shirt" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/10/howard_stern_200512141408370930_afp.jpg" width="165" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />Via <a href="http://www.orbitcast.com/archives/more-signs-of-retail-slowing-for-satellite-radio.html">Orbitcast</a> found this extensive <a href="http://bridgeratings.com/press_07.12.06.SatQ3Subs.htm">ongoing study</a> of the satellite radio wars that Bridge Ratings is conducting. The study is updated on their site weekly, more or less. Its purpose is to "analyze consumer preferences related to satellite service brand and satellite radio in general." Lots of data to mine for chart, graph and stats junkies. The study compares brands XM Satellite Radio Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: <a href="http://aolsvc.pf.aol.com/quotes/xm-satellite-radio-holdings-inc/xmsr/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">XMSR</a>) and Sirius Satellite Radio Inc. (NASDAQ: <a href="http://aolsvc.pf.aol.com/quotes/sirius-satellite-radio-inc/siri/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">SIRI</a>). Right now the group sees a trend of new sat radio subscription numbers dropping, and predicts that interest in satellite both XM or Sirius) . Bridge is having more trouble finding shoppers willing to participate in their surveys, as the Orbitcast piece <a href="http://www.orbitcast.com/archives/more-signs-of-retail-slowing-for-satellite-radio.html">notes</a>. <br /><br />One interesting stat is one tracking the percent of new Sirius subscribers who list the main reason for their choice as Howard Stern throughout the current quarter. Data polled on 9/25/2006 showed 18% chose Sirius for Stern-- down from a high of 31% on 7/29/06. The earliest polled date this quarter Stern was the reason of choice for 19%. Bridge estimates that 15% of Q3's news subs are directly because of Howard Stern.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/03/sirius-and-xm-leveling-off-but-howard-stern-effect-is-real/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Sirius and XM leveling off: but Howard Stern effect is real</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/03/sirius-and-xm-leveling-off-but-howard-stern-effect-is-real/">Sirius and XM leveling off: but Howard Stern effect is real</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 03 Oct 2006 07:17:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/03/sirius-and-xm-leveling-off-but-howard-stern-effect-is-real/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/678542/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/03/sirius-and-xm-leveling-off-but-howard-stern-effect-is-real/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>howard stern</category><category>howard stern effect</category><category>HowardStern</category><category>HowardSternEffect</category><category>nasdaq</category><category>oprah</category><category>radio</category><category>satellite</category><category>satellite radio</category><category>SatelliteRadio</category><category>siri</category><category>sirius</category><category>xm</category><category>xmsr</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Canfield]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 07:17:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[XM Radio brings Oprah on board]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/26/xm-radio-brings-oprah-on-board/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/26/xm-radio-brings-oprah-on-board/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/26/xm-radio-brings-oprah-on-board/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/industry/" rel="tag">Industry</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xmsr/" rel="tag">XM Satellite Radio (XMSR)</a></p><img id="vimage_1" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/09/oprahxm%282%29.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />With XM Radio swimming in the wake of competitor Sirius' success with bringing Howard Stern into the satellite radio biz, XM is going after a little of its own star power. The satellite radio network signed TV and publishing personality Oprah Winfrey to the network back in February, and <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/investor/content/sep2006/pi20060925_596129.htm?campaign_id=rss_null">just announced</a> the Oprah talk network to debut today -- September 26.<br /><br />This is a rather shrewd move by XM that will cost a pretty penny, but there are surely legions of women nationwide who, like their male counterparts and Stern, will have XM radio always handy just to hear their favorite celebrity. It's a formula for success that has worked for Sirius so far, and Oprah has a following just as impressive, if not more. XM hopes it is more.<br /><br />In a perfect naming convention, the talk channel "Oprah and Friends" will make its debut at 11:00am EST today after being announced as available just yesterday (the official announcement was in February). Nothing like waiting until the last minute and launching right after the announcement to capitalize on the buzz and the incessant need most Americans have for instant gratification.<br /><br />While Stern notched a reported $500 million deal with Sirius, Oprah's deal is reportedly worth $55 million. In Stern's defense these days, it's hard to not count the amazing <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2006/01/14/so-how-many-xm-and-sirius-subscribers-are-there-really/">3 million+ customers</a> who have tuned into Sirius since the raw radio personality took to the airwaves last January.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/26/xm-radio-brings-oprah-on-board/">XM Radio brings Oprah on board</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.businessweek.com/investor/content/sep2006/pi20060925_596129.htm?campaign_id=rss_null>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/26/xm-radio-brings-oprah-on-board/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/674849/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/09/26/xm-radio-brings-oprah-on-board/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Howard Stern</category><category>HowardStern</category><category>Oprah</category><category>Oprah Winfrey</category><category>Oprah XM</category><category>OprahWinfrey</category><category>OprahXm</category><category>Sirius Radio</category><category>SiriusRadio</category><category>XM Radio</category><category>XmRadio</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian White]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[XMSR gains 398k subscribers in Q2 '06]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/10/xmsr-gains-398k-subscribers-in-q2-06/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/10/xmsr-gains-398k-subscribers-in-q2-06/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/10/xmsr-gains-398k-subscribers-in-q2-06/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/press-releases/" rel="tag">Press Releases</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xmsr/" rel="tag">XM Satellite Radio (XMSR)</a></p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/10/xmsr-gains-398k-subscribers-in-q2-06/"><img id="vimage_1" height="179" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/07/radio.jpg" width="240" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" /></a>XMSR announced at the end of last week that close to 400k new subscribers came aboard during the second quarter, bringing XM's total subscriber count to 6.89 million. <br /><br />"As we previously indicated, subscriber growth in the second quarter was limited by product availability and overall softness in the retail channel," said Hugh Panero, President and CEO, XM Satellite Radio. "As we approach seven million subscribers, however, satellite radio continues to be one of the fastest growing consumer entertainment products."<br /><br />The company has scheduled a conference call on July 27, 2006, at 10:00 AM ET to announce and discuss its financial results for the second quarter of 2006. <br /><br />XM has been busy adding name-brand personalities to its already star-speckled line up, a continuing effort to draw new listeners to XM's side of the satellite radio market. The much anticipated arrival of Oprah Winfrey in September, and the recent addition of Willie Nelson, are hoped to buoy soft sales heading into the last half of the year. <br />
<p>It remains to be seen how effective the Harpo machine will be in drawing subscribers to XM. Oprah seems to turn everything she touches into gold but, I'm just hoping, for the sake of my own santiy and that of the other 6.89 million XM subscribers, that she doesn't decide to bring Dr. Phil with her. <br /></p>
[Photo by <a href="http://everystockphoto.com/photo.php?photo_id=263668">miramb</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/10/xmsr-gains-398k-subscribers-in-q2-06/">XMSR gains 398k subscribers in Q2 '06</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 10 Jul 2006 15:21:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/10/xmsr-gains-398k-subscribers-in-q2-06/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/641316/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/10/xmsr-gains-398k-subscribers-in-q2-06/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dr. phil</category><category>Dr.Phil</category><category>oprah</category><category>oprah winfrey</category><category>OprahWinfrey</category><category>phil</category><category>satellite</category><category>satellite radio</category><category>SatelliteRadio</category><category>satellites</category><category>subscriberes</category><category>willie nelson</category><category>WillieNelson</category><category>xm subscribers</category><category>xmsr</category><category>XmSubscribers</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Grant Robertson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 15:21:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Poseidon box office bust for Warner Bros.]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/15/box-office-bust-for-warner-bros/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/15/box-office-bust-for-warner-bros/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/15/box-office-bust-for-warner-bros/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a></p><a href="http://www.warnerbros.com"><img align="right" alt="" src="http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2006/05/12/arts/12pose.2.190.jpg" /></a>Warner Bros.' summer blockbuster <a href="http://poseidonmovie.warnerbros.com/"><em>Poseidon</em><em> </em></a>opened last weekend to a less than spectacular reception. The ticket sales of the $160 million film indicated that the venture was a sinking ship, a capsized boat and a Titanic disappointment (all puns intended).<br /><br />Based on <a href="http://www.warnerbros.com">Warner Bros.</a> estimates, <em>Poseidon </em>spent the weekend at position number two in box office sales with $20.3 million dollars versus the number one -- <a href="http://www.missionimpossible.com"><em>Mission: Impossible III</em></a>, which brought in $24.5 million. The remake of the 1972 film, <em>The Poseidon Adventure</em>, which is based on a Paul Gallico novel, <em>Poseidon</em>,<em> </em>was directed by a veteran of boat movies, <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000583/">Wolfgang Petersen</a> -- the guy who directed the movie <em>Das Boot </em>and <em>The Perfect Storm</em>.<br /><br />I'm sure that, as we speak, the brains over at Warner Bros. are scratching their heads over this one. Completely baffled by the unimpressive ticket sales, they are probably desperate for an explanation. <br /><br />Well, call me crazy, but I have to think that the <em>MI 3</em> success probably had a lot to do with <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000129/">Tom Cruise's</a> recent <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Cruiseonoprah.jpg">feats of crazy</a>. Had <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000621/">Kurt Russell</a> put in a comparable amount of tabloid time, Brooke Shields insults, and Oprah couch-jumping, <em>Poseidon</em> might have enjoyed a better opening weekend.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/15/box-office-bust-for-warner-bros/">Poseidon box office bust for Warner Bros.</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 15 May 2006 15:43:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://eresearch.fidelity.com/eresearch/goto/evaluate/news/basicNews.jhtml?symbols=TWX&amp;destination=%2Feresearch%2Fgoto%2Fevaluate%2Fnews%2FbasicNews.jhtml>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/15/box-office-bust-for-warner-bros/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/618539/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/15/box-office-bust-for-warner-bros/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Brooke Shields</category><category>BrookeShields</category><category>celebrity</category><category>Das Boot</category><category>DasBoot</category><category>Kurt Russell</category><category>KurtRussell</category><category>MI: 3</category><category>Mi:3</category><category>Mission Impossible III</category><category>MissionImpossibleIii</category><category>Oprah</category><category>The Perfect Storm</category><category>The Posiedon Adventure</category><category>ThePerfectStorm</category><category>ThePosiedonAdventure</category><category>Tom Cruise</category><category>TomCruise</category><category>TWX</category><category>Warner Bros</category><category>WarnerBros</category><category>Wolfgang Peterson</category><category>WolfgangPeterson</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Anne Metz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2006 15:43:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
