<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Dilution is not the Answers.com]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/20/dilution-is-not-the-answers-com/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/20/dilution-is-not-the-answers-com/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/20/dilution-is-not-the-answers-com/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/israel/" rel="tag">Israel</a></p><p><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/answers-corporation/answ/nas">Answers Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/answers-corporation/answ/nas">ANSW</a>) stock got smashed on Friday, dropping more than 23%. The company that via Answers.com provides users with answer-based search services and also operates Wikianswers.com, which is a Q&amp;A platform where users ask various questions and a community of people answers them, is having all kinds of problems trying to finance an acquisition of Lexico, owner of the Web properties Dictionary.com, Thesaurus.com, and Reference.com. </p>
<p>Answers planned to buy the company for $100 million, even though Answers had just $9.2 million in cash at the time of the announcement. <a href="http://israelnewsletter.com/2007/07/18/answerscom-answ-why-buying-dictionarycom-puts-it-a-google-away-from-being-google/">Skeptics</a>, like my <a href="http://israelnewsletter.com/2008/01/17/israel-opportunity-investor-in-the-jewish-week/">IOI</a> partner, Zack Miller, just looked at the numbers and wondered how this deal was going to be financed, and it appears that they were correct to be skeptical. Since the announcement back in July, Answers stock is down over 65%. </p>
<p>In a note on Friday, <a href="http://www.paidcontent.org/entry/419-answerscom-shares-crater-share-sale-threatened/">paidContent.org</a> referring to the deal financing said, "a plan to sell 14.94 million shares, raising $100 million. But that was based on the company's Tuesday closing price of $6.69. Since then the stock has been crushed, falling nearly 42 percent to $3.96. At this level, 14.94 million shares would only be worth $58 million, not nearly what it needs to raise to fund the buy. At these prices, the company would have to up the offering to 25.6 million, further diluting the value held by the company's current shareholders."</p>
<p>It looks like if this deal gets done, and I have my doubts that it will, investors are going to see lots more red, as the stock looks like it will be heading much lower.</p>
<p><em>Aaron Katsman is the lead Portfolio Manager and Managing Director of America Israel Investment Associates, LLC. and Senior Editor of </em><a href="http://www.israelnewsletter.com/"><em>IsraelNewsletter.com</em></a><em>. Disclosure: Writer has no position long or short in any stock mentioned as of 1/20/08.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/20/dilution-is-not-the-answers-com/">Dilution is not the Answers.com</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 20 Jan 2008 17:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/20/dilution-is-not-the-answers-com/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1091662/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/20/dilution-is-not-the-answers-com/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ANSW</category><category>Answers</category><category>answers.com</category><category>dictionary.com</category><category>IOI</category><category>IsraelNewsletter.com</category><category>Lexico</category><category>paidContent.org</category><category>Reference.com</category><category>Thesaurus.com</category><category>Wikianswers</category><category>Zack Miller</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron Katsman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 17:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Newspaper wrap-up: Energy companies under investigation]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/17/newspaper-wrap-up-energy-companies-under-investigation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/17/newspaper-wrap-up-energy-companies-under-investigation/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/17/newspaper-wrap-up-energy-companies-under-investigation/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/newspapers/" rel="tag">Newspapers</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/intc/" rel="tag">Intel (INTC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sne/" rel="tag">Sony Corp ADR (SNE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cmcsa/" rel="tag">Comcast Cl'A' (CMCSA)</a></p><strong><a href="http://www.theflyonthewall.com/splashPage.php?source=AOL"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/fly-logo-(aol).gif"  alt="" /></a>MAJOR PAPERS:</strong><br />
<ul>
    <li>On January 1, 2008 Jeffrey L. Bewkes may be the new CEO of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner Inc</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>), reported the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118998454924929173.html?mod=todays_us_money_and_investing"><em>Wall Street Journal</em></a>. The current president and COO, is expected to take over from Richard Parsons.</li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/paetec-holding-corp/paet/nas">Paetec Holding Corp</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/paetec-holding-corp/paet/nas">PAET</a>) has paid $492M for McleodUSA, creating a tough rival to <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/atandt-inc/t/nys">AT&amp;T</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/atandt-inc/t/nys">T</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/verizon-communications-inc/vz/nys">Verizon Communications</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/verizon-communications-inc/vz/nys">VZ</a>) for business telephone sales, according to the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118998913931729276.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news"><em>Wall Street Journal</em></a>.</li>
    <li><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys">Sony Corporation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys">SNE</a>) is focusing its business on consumer electronics, and may sell its advanced chip production facility, with possible buyers including <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/toshiba-corporation/tosbf/nao">Toshiba Corporation</a> (OTC: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/toshiba-corporation/tosbf/nao">TOSBF</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/international-business-machines-corporation/ibm/nys">IBM Corporation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/international-business-machines-corporation/ibm/nys">IBM</a>), reported the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118982504239228518.html"><em>Wall Street Journal</em></a>.</li>
</ul>
<strong>OTHER PAPERS:</strong><br />
<ul>
    <li>The <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/16/nyregion/16greenhouse.html?ex=1347595200&amp;en=f8258946c5bd70b0&amp;ei=5088&amp;partner=rssnyt&amp;emc=rss"><em>New York Times</em></a> reported that New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo is investigating five large energy companies, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-aes-corporation/aes/nys">AES Corporation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-aes-corporation/aes/nys">AES</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dominion-resource-inc-va/d/nys">Dominion</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dominion-resource-inc-va/d/nys">D</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dynegy-inc-cl-a-new/dyn/nys">Dynegy Inc</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/dynegy-inc-cl-a-new/dyn/nys">DYN</a>), <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/peabody-energy-corporation/btu/nys">Peabody Energy Corporation</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/peabody-energy-corporation/btu/nys">BTU</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/xcel-energy-inc/xel/nys">Xcel Energy</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/xcel-energy-inc/xel/nys">XEL</a>), in order to determine whether their plans to build coal-fired power plants pose undisclosed financial risks that their investors should know about.<br /></li>
</ul>
<strong>WEBSITES:</strong><br />
<ul>
    <li>According to sources, BuddyTV, a TV community site, is being acquired by <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/comcast-corporation/cmcsa/nas">Comcast Corporation</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/comcast-corporation/cmcsa/nas">CMCSA</a>) reported <a href="http://www.paidcontent.org/"><em>PaidContent.org</em></a>.</li>
    <li><a href="http://www.theinquirer.net/?rfp=dta"><em>TheInquirer.net</em></a> reported, citing sources, that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intel-corporation/intc/nas">Intel Corporation</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/intel-corporation/intc/nas">INTC</a>) will launch a "famous new platform" this Tuesday.</li>
</ul><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/17/newspaper-wrap-up-energy-companies-under-investigation/">Newspaper wrap-up: Energy companies under investigation</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 17 Sep 2007 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/17/newspaper-wrap-up-energy-companies-under-investigation/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/991190/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/17/newspaper-wrap-up-energy-companies-under-investigation/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>dick parsons</category><category>DickParsons</category><category>ibm</category><category>new york times</category><category>newspaper</category><category>NewYorkTimes</category><category>ny times</category><category>NyTimes</category><category>paet</category><category>paetec</category><category>paidcontent.org</category><category>paper</category><category>periodical</category><category>sne</category><category>sony</category><category>theinquirer.net</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>tosbf</category><category>toshiba</category><category>twx</category><category>wall street journal</category><category>WallStreetJournal</category><category>wsj</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Buscemi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[What is AOL worth?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/04/what-is-aol-worth/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/04/what-is-aol-worth/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/04/what-is-aol-worth/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a></p><p>On May 31st, BloggingStocks' parent company, <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">Time Warner Inc</a>.'s (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/time-warner-inc/twx/nys">TWX</a>) president Jeff Bewkes publicly mused about taking AOL public, according to <a href="http://www.paidcontent.org/entry/419-bewkes-wishlist-creating-internet-currency-with-aol-spinoff/">paidContent.org</a>.</p>
<p>Bewkes noted that AOL was at a competitive disadvantage due its lack of an "internet public currency." While that currency enabled AOL to offer <a href="http://www.wsws.org/articles/2000/jan2000/merg-j14.shtml">$166 billion</a> in stock to buy Time Warner back in January 2000, <strong>what would it be worth today?</strong></p>
<p><strong>$24 billion.</strong> That's one guess made by multiplying my estimate of AOL's 2007 revenues of $6 billion -- calculated by quadrupling AOL's <a href="http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1105705/000095014407004089/g06735e10vq.htm">Q1 2007 revenues of $1.5 billion</a> -- by a price/sales ratio of 4. The latter is based on a review of the price/sales ratios of comparable pure-play internet content firms such as:</p>
<ul>
    <li>
    <div><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Yahoo! Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">YHOO</a>): <a href="http://moneycentral.msn.com/investor/invsub/results/compare.asp?Page=PriceRatios&amp;Symbol=YHOO">5.9 </a></div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cnet-networks-inc/cnet/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">CNET Networks, Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cnet-networks-inc/cnet/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">CNET</a>): <a href="http://moneycentral.msn.com/investor/invsub/results/compare.asp?Page=PriceRatios&amp;Symbol=cnet">3.5</a> </div>
    </li>
    <li>
    <div><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/baidu-com-inc-ads/bidu/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">Baidu.com Inc.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/baidu-com-inc-ads/bidu/nas?tabs=quotesandnews">BIDU</a>): <a href="http://moneycentral.msn.com/investor/invsub/results/compare.asp?Page=PriceRatios&amp;Symbol=bidu">37.1</a> </div>
    </li>
</ul>
<p>I think such a public offering could unlock value because at $24 billion, AOL would be worth 30% of TWX's current $80 billion market capitalization, even though it represents only 12.5% of TWX revenues and a mere 4% of its assets. Moreover, AOL stock could motivate staff and fuel acquisitions.</p>
<p><em>Peter Cohan is president of</em> <a href="http://petercohan.com/"><em>Peter S. Cohan &amp; Associates</em></a><em>, a management consulting and venture capital firm. He also </em><a href="http://www3.babson.edu/Academics/Divisions/management/facultyprofile.cfm?pageid=391236"><em>teaches management at Babson College</em></a><em> and edits </em><a href="http://petercohan.blogspot.com/2007/01/cohan-letter-up-15-in-2006.html"><em>The Cohan Letter</em></a><em>. He has no financial interest in Time Warner stock.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/04/what-is-aol-worth/">What is AOL worth?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 04 Jun 2007 19:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/04/what-is-aol-worth/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/910467/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/06/04/what-is-aol-worth/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AOL</category><category>Baidu.com</category><category>BIDU</category><category>CNET</category><category>internet public currency</category><category>IPOs</category><category>Jeff Bewkes</category><category>paidContent.org</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>TWX</category><category>Yahoo!</category><category>YHOO</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Cohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 19:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Blogs are cashing in]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/27/blogs-are-cashing-in/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/27/blogs-are-cashing-in/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/27/blogs-are-cashing-in/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a></p><p><a title="Photo Sharing" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/taulli/176026742/"><img height="210" alt="online content" src="http://static.flickr.com/56/176026742_7f6d61fb21_o.png" width="136" align="right" /></a></p>
<p>This week, the <a href="http://www.wsj.com">Wall Street Journal</a> wrote about how venture capital is starting to seep into the blogosphere ("Bloggers Find Financial Backers For Their Independent News Sites").</p>
<p>Deja vu&nbsp; all over again?&nbsp; Interestingly enough, back in the 1990s, there was a flood of money that flowed into content deals. Yes, some journalists were becoming dot-com multimillionaires. However, when Nasdaq collapsed, so did many of these ventures.&nbsp; In fact, there was a book on the topic -- <em>Starving to Death on $200 Million</em> - which chronicled the implosion of the Industry Standard.</p>
<p>So, to use an ominous phrase:&nbsp; is this time different?&nbsp; Perhaps so.&nbsp; Actually, the attraction of blogs is that they are fairly low cost.&nbsp; This makes it possible to make money from niche categories.&nbsp; Also, it is fairly easy to scale-up (since bandwidth is extremely cheap).</p>
<p>Some examples of recent financings:&nbsp; Alan Patricof, who invested in <a href="http://www.apple.com">Apple</a>&nbsp;at the start-up phase, has put his own money in <a href="http://www.paidcontent.org">PaidContent.org</a>; True Venture Partners invested in <a href="http://www.gigaom.com">GigaOm.com</a>, a popular blog by Om Malik, a writer for Business 2.0 (which is a publication of <a href="http://www.timewarner.com">Time Warner</a>); and Mark Cuban, who sold Broadcast.com to Yahoo!, invested in Sharesleuth.com.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/27/blogs-are-cashing-in/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Blogs are cashing in</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/27/blogs-are-cashing-in/">Blogs are cashing in</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 27 Jun 2006 09:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/27/blogs-are-cashing-in/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/637219/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/06/27/blogs-are-cashing-in/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Blogs</category><category>Business 2.0</category><category>Business2.0</category><category>GigaOm</category><category>Google</category><category>Om Malik</category><category>OmMalik</category><category>PaidContent.org</category><category>Wall Street Journal</category><category>WallStreetJournal</category><category>Yahoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 09:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Yahoo launches consumer tech site]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/01/yahoo-launches-consumer-tech-site/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/01/yahoo-launches-consumer-tech-site/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/01/yahoo-launches-consumer-tech-site/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/launches/" rel="tag">Launches</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a></p><p>Yahoo's <a href="http://tech.yahoo.com/">consumer tech site</a> launched Sunday night, points out <ahref="http://www.paidcontent.org/#post-29028">Paidcontent.org</a>, noting that the site is headed up by PatrickHouston, Yahoo's general manager for technology--and the former editor-in-chief of CNET. Paidcontent's initial react?"Still a work in progress," writes Staci Kramer. "Gives Yahoo denizens a destination and some niftyfeatures but wouldn't be the first stop for CNET vets. Then again, I'm not sure it's meant to be."</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/01/yahoo-launches-consumer-tech-site/">Yahoo launches consumer tech site</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 01 May 2006 08:04:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.paidcontent.org/#post-29028>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/01/yahoo-launches-consumer-tech-site/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/613761/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/01/yahoo-launches-consumer-tech-site/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>PaidContent.org</category><category>Yahoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dakota Smith]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 08:04:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
