<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Loonie at par with dollar: What's a Canadian to do? Buy in the States]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/21/loonie-at-par-with-dollar-whats-a-canadian-to-do-buy-in-the-states/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/21/loonie-at-par-with-dollar-whats-a-canadian-to-do-buy-in-the-states/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/21/loonie-at-par-with-dollar-whats-a-canadian-to-do-buy-in-the-states/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/canada/" rel="tag">Canada</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/09/cad.jpg" />Believe it or not, but "<a href="http://www.thestar.com/Business/article/258929">cheers erupted</a> on the foreign exchange desk at Scotia Capital" yesterday when the <span id="ctl00_ContentPlaceHolder_article_NavWebPart_Article_ctl00___Title__" class="headlineArticle">loonie (that's what us Canadians call our dollar) first <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/after-31-years-canadian-dollar-equals-us/20070921101409990001">traded at parity</a> with the U.S. dollar -- for the first time in 31 years. I'm sure the scene was similar in other banks across Canada. As is almost usual, though, the Americans beat us to it as they are the ones who actually did the trade, specifically </span>Citigroup's New York currency desk. Oh, well.<br /><br />The Canadian dollar hit its historic low of 61.79 cents (U.S.) on Jan. 21, 2002, but has gained more than 16% this year and almost 8% since mid-August alone. 					The True North is indeed strong. But is this good for Canada? For the U.S.? Canadian exporters are no doubt suffering, American ones will be doing better following the fall of the U.S. dollar. Tourism will likely improve in the U.S., but suffer in Canada. And consumers? Canadian consumers aren't happy, but I'm sure U.S. outlet malls along the Canadian border are quite happy. It used to be the other way around.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/21/loonie-at-par-with-dollar-whats-a-canadian-to-do-buy-in-the-states/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Loonie at par with dollar: What's a Canadian to do? Buy in the States</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/21/loonie-at-par-with-dollar-whats-a-canadian-to-do-buy-in-the-states/">Loonie at par with dollar: What's a Canadian to do? Buy in the States</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 21 Sep 2007 12:52:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/after-31-years-canadian-dollar-equals-us/20070921101409990001>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/21/loonie-at-par-with-dollar-whats-a-canadian-to-do-buy-in-the-states/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/995096/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/09/21/loonie-at-par-with-dollar-whats-a-canadian-to-do-buy-in-the-states/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CAD</category><category>canadian dollar</category><category>CanadianDollar</category><category>exchange rate</category><category>ExchangeRate</category><category>featured</category><category>loonie</category><category>parity</category><category>US dollar</category><category>USD</category><category>UsDollar</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Melly Alazraki]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 12:52:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Woman execs paid less: close eyes, reach in hat, pick reason]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/10/woman-execs-paid-less-close-eyes-reach-in-hat-pick-reason/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/10/woman-execs-paid-less-close-eyes-reach-in-hat-pick-reason/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/10/woman-execs-paid-less-close-eyes-reach-in-hat-pick-reason/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/press-releases/" rel="tag">Press Releases</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/television/" rel="tag">Television</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ebay/" rel="tag">eBay (EBAY)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/pep/" rel="tag">PepsiCo (PEP)</a></p><p><img id="vimage_2" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/10/woman_lonely_storefront_sm.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" />I want, oh so deeply, to be shocked. But I'm not. Here's the thing: women are powerful! Women are amazing! Women are reaching the upper echelons of corporate America! Hurray! And while I'm sure everyone at NOW threw a soda party when Indra Nooyi took over as CEO of PepsiCo, Inc. (NYSE:PEP), I'm sure they also tried to get mad about today's "news": <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/top-paid-male-executives-all-outdraw/n20061010133809990001">male executives make way more than female executives</a>. And then I imagine they remembered: this is nothing new. This is nothing surprising.</p>
<p>Women have been making less than men since the dawn of time. And although Oprah and Indra and Meg are so darned powerful, they can hardly sway the enormity of gender history in a few decades of exerting their collective feminine force.</p>
<p>Let's try one reason female CEOs, CFOs and the like make pocket change compared to their male brethren (and no, there seems to be no relation between executive pay and corporate profit, sales, stock performance, or how many pageviews your bio on the corporate homepage got this year): there just aren't as many of them. Naturally that doesn't explain why (for instance) the top-paid female executive, Safra Catz -- president and CFO Oracle Corporation (NASDAQ:ORCL) -- made a sad 36% of what the top-paid male executive made (that's Eugene Isenberg, CEO of Nabors Industries Ltd. (NYSE:NBR), for the record). Catz wasn't even the highest-paid executive at her own company, pulling in about half of what founder and CEO Larry Ellison scored.</p>
<p>Well. That<em> is</em> Larry Ellison after all. His ego has to be worth at least as much as three women executives put together.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/10/woman-execs-paid-less-close-eyes-reach-in-hat-pick-reason/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Woman execs paid less: close eyes, reach in hat, pick reason</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/10/woman-execs-paid-less-close-eyes-reach-in-hat-pick-reason/">Woman execs paid less: close eyes, reach in hat, pick reason</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 10 Oct 2006 18:13:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/top-paid-male-executives-all-outdraw/n20061010133809990001>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/10/woman-execs-paid-less-close-eyes-reach-in-hat-pick-reason/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/682628/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/10/woman-execs-paid-less-close-eyes-reach-in-hat-pick-reason/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ceo</category><category>ceo parity</category><category>ceo pay</category><category>CeoParity</category><category>CeoPay</category><category>ceos</category><category>parity</category><category>parity in pay</category><category>ParityInPay</category><category>pay</category><category>woman ceo</category><category>WomanCeo</category><category>women</category><category>women ceo</category><category>women ceos</category><category>women vs. men</category><category>WomenCeo</category><category>WomenCeos</category><category>WomenVs.Men</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 18:13:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
