<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Another court loss for Qualcomm]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/01/another-court-loss-for-qualcomm/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/01/another-court-loss-for-qualcomm/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/01/another-court-loss-for-qualcomm/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/qcom/" rel="tag">QUALCOMM Inc (QCOM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/brcm/" rel="tag">Broadcom Corp'A' (BRCM)</a></p><p>A federal judge has told <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/qualcomm-incorporated/qcom/nas">Qualcomm</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/qualcomm-incorporated/qcom/nas">QCOM</a>) that it can no longer make chips based on three patents held by rival <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/broadcom-corporation/brcm/nas">Broadcom</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/broadcom-corporation/brcm/nas">BRCM</a>). The company can make use of the intellectual property for another year, giving its some time to reach resolution with its rival. </p>
<p>Qualcomm will almost certainly have to pay royalties if it wants to keep marketing chips based on the Broadcom patents. </p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119915396717160155.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news">According to</a> <em>The Wall Street Journal</em>, "The chips are used in two kinds of third-generation cellular networks -- one called EV-DO, which Qualcomm developed, and another called WCDMA that is supported by a broader array of chip makers."</p>
<p>Reuters <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsNews/idUKN3159271220080101?rpc=44">quotes</a> Broadcom's general counsel as saying, "Broadcom should not have to compete against companies that use Broadcom's own patented technology against us, and this injunction puts a stop to Qualcomm doing just that."</p>
<p>It now appears that Qualcomm's strategy of leaning on customers and rivals has come to an end. </p>
<em>Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com.</em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/01/another-court-loss-for-qualcomm/">Another court loss for Qualcomm</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 01 Jan 2008 13:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119915396717160155.html?mod=hps_us_whats_news>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/01/another-court-loss-for-qualcomm/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1074777/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/01/another-court-loss-for-qualcomm/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>BRCM</category><category>Broadcom</category><category>chips</category><category>inthenews</category><category>microchips</category><category>patent dispute</category><category>PatentDispute</category><category>QCOM</category><category>Qualcomm</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas McIntyre]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 13:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Barron's: The perils -- and opportunities -- in litigation]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/24/barrons-the-perils-and-opportunities-in-litigation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/24/barrons-the-perils-and-opportunities-in-litigation/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/24/barrons-the-perils-and-opportunities-in-litigation/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sec-filings/" rel="tag">SEC Filings</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ma/" rel="tag">MasterCard Inc'A' (MA)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/vz/" rel="tag">Verizon Communications (VZ)</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/03/barrons.bmp" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />This week, Vonage Corp's (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/vonage-holdings-corp/vg/nys">VG</a>) stock plummeted because a federal judge issued an injunction against the company regarding a patent dispute with Verizon Communications Inc. (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/verizon-communications-inc/vz/nys">VZ</a>). </p>
<p>Yes, litigation can be harsh on investors. And, usually companies disclose their legal risks in their SEC disclosures. For example, Vonage disclosed its Verizon litigation in its IPO filing.</p>
<p>As for investors, these disclosures don't really matter much. After all, most companies have litigation. And, even legal experts have difficulties determining the probabilities of a case.</p>
<p>Well, <a href="http://www.barrons.com">Barron's</a> [a paid service] has an interesting article on the topic for this week's issue. The main focus of the article is the analysis of Nick Rodelli, who is the legal guru with the <a href="https://www.cfraonline.com/cfra/">Center for Financial Research and Analysis</a>.</p>
<p>For example, he thinks the World Wrestling Entertainment (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/world-wrestling-entertainment-inc/wwe/nys">WWE</a>) could get a nice bump in revenues if it wins some of its litigation on licensing. </p>
<p>On the other hand, he is concerned about the impact of antitrust litigation on MasterCard Inc. (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/mastercard-incorporated/ma/nys">MA</a>) and thinks the stock price has not reflected the risk. He also considers this to be the same situation with Sherwin-Williams Co. (NYSE:<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/the-sherwin-williams-company/shw/nys">SHW</a>). The company faces litigation regarding the sale of lead paint many years ago.</p>
<p>Rodelli thinks that it is common for investors to misprice stocks when factoring in litigation. And, this inefficiency is actually an opportunity for investors -- although, it requires quite a bit of expertise to pull it off.</p>
<p><em>Tom Taulli is the author of various books, including the</em> Complete M&amp;A Handbook <em>and the</em> EDGAR-Online Guide to Decoding Financial Statements.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/24/barrons-the-perils-and-opportunities-in-litigation/">Barron's: The perils -- and opportunities -- in litigation</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 24 Mar 2007 16:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/24/barrons-the-perils-and-opportunities-in-litigation/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/859568/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/24/barrons-the-perils-and-opportunities-in-litigation/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Barron's</category><category>IPO</category><category>Litigation</category><category>MasterCard</category><category>Nick Rodelli</category><category>patent dispute</category><category>SEC</category><category>Sherwin-Williams</category><category>Verizon</category><category>Vonage</category><category>World Wrestling Entertainment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2007 16:10:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
