<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Payroll Data Sets Bearish Tone for the Trading Day]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/06/payroll-data-sets-bearish-tone-for-the-trading-day/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/06/payroll-data-sets-bearish-tone-for-the-trading-day/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/06/payroll-data-sets-bearish-tone-for-the-trading-day/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/04/dol-logo-1270224022.jpg" alt="Labor Department seal" />Many were expecting good news out of the Labor Department when it released the nonfarm payroll report for July. Unfortunately, this wasn't the case -- and the morning has taken a decidedly bearish tone.</p>
<p>According to the Labor Department, <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/story/careers/employers-shed-131-000-jobs-in-july/19583683/" target="_blank">131,000 jobs were lost during the month</a>. The drop was attributed to the fact that 143,000 Census-related jobs were cut. Analysts expected overall employment to absorb the number of temporary jobs cut and show a drop of 65,000. When revising payrolls for May and June the picture turned even bleaker. The Labor Department revised the reading for those two months lower by 97,000, meaning fewer jobs than originally thought were created.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/06/payroll-data-sets-bearish-tone-for-the-trading-day/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Payroll Data Sets Bearish Tone for the Trading Day</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/06/payroll-data-sets-bearish-tone-for-the-trading-day/">Payroll Data Sets Bearish Tone for the Trading Day</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 06 Aug 2010 10:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/06/payroll-data-sets-bearish-tone-for-the-trading-day/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19583673/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/06/payroll-data-sets-bearish-tone-for-the-trading-day/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economic recovery</category><category>employment</category><category>inthenews</category><category>job report</category><category>jobs</category><category>nonfarm payroll</category><category>payroll</category><category>payroll data</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 10:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Temporary Census Jobs Drive May's Hiring Increase]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/04/may-nonfarm-payroll-report/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/04/may-nonfarm-payroll-report/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/04/may-nonfarm-payroll-report/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/02/unemployment.jpg" alt="jobs" />This morning's nonfarm payroll report was a good news/bad news sort of situation. The good news? The nation <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/article/payrolls-up-431000-lifted-by-census/719129/" target="_blank">added 431,000 jobs last month</a>. The bad news? Of those jobs, 411,000 were added thanks to the Census, <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/hiring-weak-in-may-except-for-census-workers-2010-06-04" target="n">meaning they were temporary workers</a>.</p>
<p>In reality, payrolls advanced by 20,000 during May (taking the temporary jobs out of the equation), a rather disappointing number (and far short of the expected increase of 540,000).</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/04/may-nonfarm-payroll-report/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Temporary Census Jobs Drive May's Hiring Increase</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/04/may-nonfarm-payroll-report/">Temporary Census Jobs Drive May's Hiring Increase</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 04 Jun 2010 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/04/may-nonfarm-payroll-report/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19503345/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/06/04/may-nonfarm-payroll-report/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>nonfarm</category><category>nonfarm payroll</category><category>payroll</category><category>payroll data</category><category>unemployment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[As Payrolls Go, So Goes ADP]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/10/as-payrolls-go-so-goes-adp/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/10/as-payrolls-go-so-goes-adp/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/10/as-payrolls-go-so-goes-adp/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/adp/" rel="tag">Automatic Data Proc (ADP)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/stocks-to-buy/" rel="tag">Stocks to Buy</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/adp-logo-240.jpg"  alt="" />The stock of Automatic Data Processing (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/automatic-data-processing-inc/adp/nas">ADP</a>), which I first wrote about <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/20/look-for-adp-to-rise-with-payrolls/#continued">on June 22, 2009</a>, at a price of $36.84, has pulled-back recently after rising to about $44 in late 2009, and according to my analysis that creates another, attractive entry point.<br />
<br />
Despite the worst U.S. recession in more than 25 years -- one that has devastated payrolls -- ADP has held its own, with its stock price in 2009 recovering most of what it lost during the pronounced contraction.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/10/as-payrolls-go-so-goes-adp/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>As Payrolls Go, So Goes ADP</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/10/as-payrolls-go-so-goes-adp/">As Payrolls Go, So Goes ADP</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/10/as-payrolls-go-so-goes-adp/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19352608/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/10/as-payrolls-go-so-goes-adp/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>ADP</category><category>payroll</category><category>recession</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Surprise Drop in the Unemployment Rate Is No Reason to Celebrate]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/05/surprise-drop-in-the-unemployment-rate-is-no-reason-to-celebrate/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/05/surprise-drop-in-the-unemployment-rate-is-no-reason-to-celebrate/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/05/surprise-drop-in-the-unemployment-rate-is-no-reason-to-celebrate/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/01/jobboard18.jpg" alt="job board" />Well, this was a nice surprise ... the unemployment rate <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/us-jan-jobless-rate-falls-to-97-low-since-aug-2010-02-05-830260" target="_blank">fell to 9.7%</a> in January from 10% in December, according to the Labor Department. This is good news, as expectations were for the unemployment rate to hold at 10% -- so some people are finding some jobs somewhere.<p>
That said, the number of nonfarm payrolls dropped by 20,000 while expectations called for a gain of 25,000. With stock futures limiting some of their early morning losses, it looks as if investors and analysts are holding on to the unemployment rate news rather than the news that more jobs were lost than expected.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/05/surprise-drop-in-the-unemployment-rate-is-no-reason-to-celebrate/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Surprise Drop in the Unemployment Rate Is No Reason to Celebrate</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/05/surprise-drop-in-the-unemployment-rate-is-no-reason-to-celebrate/">Surprise Drop in the Unemployment Rate Is No Reason to Celebrate</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 05 Feb 2010 11:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/05/surprise-drop-in-the-unemployment-rate-is-no-reason-to-celebrate/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19346306/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/02/05/surprise-drop-in-the-unemployment-rate-is-no-reason-to-celebrate/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>nonfarm payroll</category><category>payroll</category><category>unemployment</category><category>unemployment rate</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 11:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Entrepreneur's Journal: Making Payroll Painless]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/27/entrepreneurs-journal-making-payroll-painless/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/27/entrepreneurs-journal-making-payroll-painless/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/27/entrepreneurs-journal-making-payroll-painless/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/intu/" rel="tag">Intuit Inc (INTU)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/small-business/" rel="tag">Small Business</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/12/payroll.jpg" />Let's face it, payroll is one of the drudgeries of running your own business. It's a big expense and complicated. Actually, some companies have imploded because of <a href="http://www.taulli.com/how-to-deal-with-payroll-tax-problems">payroll problems</a>.</p>
<p>So what to do? Here are things to consider.</p>
<p><strong>Online Services:</strong> Just like with anything nowadays, there are online services to manage your payroll. One of the best I've seen is <a href="http://www.paycycle.com">PayCycle.com</a>, which is now owned by Intuit (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/intuit-inc/intu/nas">INTU</a>).</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/27/entrepreneurs-journal-making-payroll-painless/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Entrepreneur's Journal: Making Payroll Painless</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/27/entrepreneurs-journal-making-payroll-painless/">Entrepreneur's Journal: Making Payroll Painless</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 27 Dec 2009 17:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/27/entrepreneurs-journal-making-payroll-painless/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19292981/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/12/27/entrepreneurs-journal-making-payroll-painless/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>contractors</category><category>Employers Legal Handbook</category><category>featured</category><category>INTU</category><category>Intuit</category><category>Paycycle.com</category><category>Payroll</category><category>payroll taxes</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Taulli]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 17:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[October job growth strong, but only in the lower-paying service industries]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/02/october-job-growth-strong-but-only-in-the-lower-paying-service/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/02/october-job-growth-strong-but-only-in-the-lower-paying-service/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/02/october-job-growth-strong-but-only-in-the-lower-paying-service/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/personalfinance/" rel="tag">Personal Finance</a></p><p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/rogerjones/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/11/waiters.jpg" alt="Waitstaff" /></a>Everyone's cheering today the <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/october-job-growth-strongest-since/story.aspx?guid=%7bB61446FA-7F8A-4901-B503-7ED679C3FB45%7d&amp;print=true&amp;dist=printTop">strong payroll report</a> released by the Labor Department, but if you take a closer look at the numbers you'll understand why so many middle class folks do not think the labor market offers them any good news. While the government reported that unemployment held steady at 4.7% and 166,000 jobs were created, you must look at where those jobs were created and where jobs were lost to get the true picture.</p>
<p>Job growth was created in the service sector, which added 190,000 jobs - led by food services (37,000 jobs - primarily at restaurants), employment services (34,000 jobs) and health care (34,000 jobs). Job losses were seen in the higher paying manufacturing sector where 21,000 jobs were lost in October and 203,000 jobs have been lost in the last year. Employment at banks and mortgage brokers dropped 5,000 where 56,000 people lost jobs since February and more layoffs are expected as the mortgage mess continues to grow.</p>
<p>Richard Moody, Chief Economist for Mission Residential, also found that 21,500 jobs were lost in retail trade during October, which he said is the third consecutive monthly decline. In his October NonFarm Report, he wrote, this "is a sign that retailers are not expecting great things in the coming months."</p>
<p>Earnings also were flat. Just a 0.2 cent gain in average hourly wage to $17.58 an hour with no gain in the average workweek of 33.8 hours. </p>
<p>If you're in the top executive ranks you're pay may look good, but for the middle class these numbers don't show much hope of earning a better paycheck.</p>
<p><em><a href="http://www.litaepstein.com">Lita Epstein</a> has written more than 20 books including the Complete Idiot's Guide to Improving Your Credit Score due out in December.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/02/october-job-growth-strong-but-only-in-the-lower-paying-service/">October job growth strong, but only in the lower-paying service industries</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 02 Nov 2007 11:47:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/october-job-growth-strongest-since/story.aspx?guid=%7bB61446FA-7F8A-4901-B503-7ED679C3FB45%7d&amp;print=true&amp;dist=printTop>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/02/october-job-growth-strong-but-only-in-the-lower-paying-service/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1028032/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/02/october-job-growth-strong-but-only-in-the-lower-paying-service/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>jobs</category><category>labor department</category><category>LaborDepartment</category><category>payroll</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lita Epstein]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 11:47:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Top executives agree they are overpaid]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/15/top-executives-agree-they-are-overpaid/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/15/top-executives-agree-they-are-overpaid/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/15/top-executives-agree-they-are-overpaid/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/scandals/" rel="tag">Scandals</a></p>Warren Buffett has said that you should never ask a barber if you need a haircut. But if a barber tells you that you don't need a haircut, that probably means you <em>really</em> don't need one.<br /><br />And while most people would agree that top executives at publicly traded companies are overpaid, we now have all the evidence we need to end this debate: They think they're overpaid too! A survey of 70 presidents and chief executives conducted by the National Association of Corporate Directors found that 2 out of 3 top executives thought chiefs were given high compensation relative to their performance. Only 2.2% thought the pay was too low!<br /><br />It's time for corporate directors to be taken out to the woodshed. They have failed mightily in their duty to shareholders. They're supposed to be representing our interests, but instead serve as lapdogs, paying CEOs amounts of money that they themselves consider obscene!<br /><br />Some have attempted to frame this as a populist issue, pointing to the fact that the gap between the rich and poor has reached its widest point in 60 years. But I'm more concerned about it as a corporate governance issue. Directors are pretty obviously wasting shareholders' resources on excessive compensation, and it needs to stop.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/15/top-executives-agree-they-are-overpaid/">Top executives agree they are overpaid</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 15 Oct 2007 17:38:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/29593584-7a7a-11dc-9bee-0000779fd2ac.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/15/top-executives-agree-they-are-overpaid/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1013213/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/10/15/top-executives-agree-they-are-overpaid/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>benefits</category><category>CEO</category><category>compensation</category><category>executive</category><category>inthenews</category><category>NACD</category><category>National Association of Corporate Directors</category><category>NationalAssociationOfCorporateDirectors</category><category>pay</category><category>payroll</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 17:38:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Nonfarm employment rose by 167,000 in December; unemployment unchanged]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/05/nonfarm-employment-rose-by-167-000-in-december-unemployment-unc/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/05/nonfarm-employment-rose-by-167-000-in-december-unemployment-unc/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/05/nonfarm-employment-rose-by-167-000-in-december-unemployment-unc/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/before-the-bell/" rel="tag">Before the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/indices/" rel="tag">Indices</a></p><p>Nonfarm employment increased by 167,000 in December,while the unemployment rate remained unchanged at 4.5 percent,according to <a href="http://stats.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm">Bureau of Labor Statistics.</a> Average weekly wages rose 0.5 percent to $577.66. Hourly earnings for the year were up 4.5 percent.</p>
<p>Jobs grew the most in eight months, according to <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=alJtTBET8RsU&amp;refer=home">Bloomberg News</a>, adding that this shows that the economy is weathering the slump in housing and manufacturing. The increase was higher than the 100,000-job median estimate of 70 analysts surveyed by Bloomberg. Economists surveyed by <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB116800312620968173.html?mod=home_whats_news_us">Dow Jones</a> expected a 115,000-job increase and for hourly earnings to rise 0.3 percent. The yield on the benchmark 10-year Treasury note jumped 7 basis points to 4.67 percent following the report, Bloomberg said.</p>
<p>In its story, <a href="http://today.reuters.com/news/articlebusiness.aspx?type=ousiv&amp;storyID=2007-01-05T133556Z_01_N04190842_RTRIDST_0_BUSINESSPRO-USA-ECONOMY-JOBS-DC.XML&amp;from=business&amp;src=010507_0841_TOPSTORY_job_growth_strong_in_dec.">Reuters </a>said, "some parts of the report may be troubling to Federal Reserve policy-makers who have expressed concern about potential inflation." The increase in average hourly earnings was the highest since April, Reuters said.</p>
<p>If jobs are healthy and wages are going up, why are consumers so worried? Many retailers reported disappointing holiday sales. Housing prices, with the exception of places like New York City, are soft. </p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/05/nonfarm-employment-rose-by-167-000-in-december-unemployment-unc/">Nonfarm employment rose by 167,000 in December; unemployment unchanged</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 05 Jan 2007 08:34:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/05/nonfarm-employment-rose-by-167-000-in-december-unemployment-unc/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/729737/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/05/nonfarm-employment-rose-by-167-000-in-december-unemployment-unc/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>economy</category><category>fed</category><category>Federal Reserve</category><category>FederalReserve</category><category>inflation</category><category>payroll</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 08:34:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Consumer confidence and payrolls: A Tale of Two Views]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/08/consumer-confidence-and-payrolls-a-tale-of-two-views/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/08/consumer-confidence-and-payrolls-a-tale-of-two-views/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/08/consumer-confidence-and-payrolls-a-tale-of-two-views/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/major-movement/" rel="tag">Major Movement</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/indices/" rel="tag">Indices</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a></p><p>Consumer Confidence numbers were the second piece of major economic data released today. The first was the Payroll numbers released at 8:30 AM and discussed in <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/08/payroll-boost-supports-fed-position/">my earlier post.</a> </p>
<p>This was literally a Tale of Two Views. The Payroll numbers came in better than expected, showing unexpected strength in the economy. However, Consumer Confidence data showed a dip from 92.4 in November to 86.9. Neither report indicated an extreme in a single direction.</p>
<p>What does this mean? It looks more like the soft landing that the Fed has been forecasting. I discussed this in detail in my prior post <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/bloggers/douglas-s-roberts/">The U.S. Stock Market: Five Reasons 2007 is Looking Like 1995</a>. The stock market is literally climbing the Wall of Worry.</p>
<p>This is great news for long-term investors and vindicates the bullishness that I have had since last summer. It allows the Fed to maintain its current position of neither raising nor lowering interest rates. The stock market continues to rises slowly.</p>
<p>However, it is driving the pundits and traders insane! They have been forecasting that Fed will have to adjust its position to reflect their own. The inflation hawks say that this means higher rates. The recession doves say that the current weakness in the economy will force the Fed to lower rates. The Fed seems to be winning the battle.</p>
<p>Remember not to fight the Fed. As I have said before, the Fed can maintain its position longer than you can remain solvent! The best and easiest way to make money in the market is to Follow the Fed.</p>
<p><em>Doug Roberts is the Founder and Chief Investment Strategist for <a href="http://www.followthefed.com">FollowtheFed.com</a>, an independent research firm focusing on investment strategies using the Federal Reserve's impact on the stock prices. He previously held executive positions at Morgan Stanley Group and Sanford C. Bernstein &amp; Co.</em><br /></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/08/consumer-confidence-and-payrolls-a-tale-of-two-views/">Consumer confidence and payrolls: A Tale of Two Views</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 08 Dec 2006 12:41:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/08/consumer-confidence-and-payrolls-a-tale-of-two-views/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/715184/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/12/08/consumer-confidence-and-payrolls-a-tale-of-two-views/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>comsumer confidence</category><category>ComsumerConfidence</category><category>Federal Reserve</category><category>payroll</category><category>payroll numbers</category><category>PayrollNumbers</category><category>The Fed</category><category>TheFed</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas S. Roberts]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 12:41:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
