<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Consumer Spending Slows During June]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/03/consumer-spending-in-june/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/03/consumer-spending-in-june/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/03/consumer-spending-in-june/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/walmart-checkout.jpg" alt="" />It looks like Monday's rally will be a memory thanks to Tuesday's earnings disappointments and economic data. Let's take a look at the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.aolnews.com/story/consumer-spending-and-personal-incomes/719129">consumer spending data</a> that was released.</p>
<p>The Commerce Department announced that personal spending was unchanged during June, marking the third-straight month that saw "lackluster consumer demand." Incomes were also flat during June, turning in the weakest month in the past nine.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/03/consumer-spending-in-june/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Consumer Spending Slows During June</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/03/consumer-spending-in-june/">Consumer Spending Slows During June</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 03 Aug 2010 13:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/03/consumer-spending-in-june/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19578982/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/08/03/consumer-spending-in-june/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>consumer spending</category><category>financial crisis</category><category>inthenews</category><category>personal income</category><category>spending</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 13:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Consumer Spending Stalls Out in April]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/30/consumer-spending-stalls-out-in-april/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/30/consumer-spending-stalls-out-in-april/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/30/consumer-spending-stalls-out-in-april/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/target-shoppers-240x160.jpg" alt="" />In order for the current U.S. economic recovery to continue, people are going to need to spend. But in April, consumer spending had its <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gNiyJ905Ho0Ur96V2TQhsBX19lGwD9G01JO00">weakest showing in the past seven months</a>.<br />
<br />
Consumption was flat for the month, despite rising incomes, as consumers opted to stash away their money in savings instead of running out and spending it. The savings rate jumped to 3.6% for the month, up from 3.1% during March.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/30/consumer-spending-stalls-out-in-april/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Consumer Spending Stalls Out in April</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/30/consumer-spending-stalls-out-in-april/">Consumer Spending Stalls Out in April</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 30 May 2010 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/30/consumer-spending-stalls-out-in-april/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19496184/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/30/consumer-spending-stalls-out-in-april/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>consumer spending</category><category>consumers</category><category>economic recovery</category><category>income</category><category>inthenews</category><category>personal income</category><category>recession</category><category>savings</category><category>shopping</category><category>spending</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Fowlkes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Latest U.S. Price Data Provides Few Morsels for Inflation Hawks]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/01/latest-u-s-price-data-provides-few-morsels-for-inflation-hawks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/01/latest-u-s-price-data-provides-few-morsels-for-inflation-hawks/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/01/latest-u-s-price-data-provides-few-morsels-for-inflation-hawks/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a></p><p>The key data point in January's U.S. <a href="http://www.bea.gov/newsreleases/national/pi/pinewsrelease.htm">personal income and consumer spending data</a>?</p>
<p>Well, the 0.5% increase in consumer spending (0.3% after adjusting for inflation) was encouraging -- it was the fourth straight monthly increase in consumer spending -- and the 0.1% in personal income was low -- but at least it wasn't a decline, however perhaps the most compelling data point concerned U.S. inflation.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/01/latest-u-s-price-data-provides-few-morsels-for-inflation-hawks/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Latest U.S. Price Data Provides Few Morsels for Inflation Hawks</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/01/latest-u-s-price-data-provides-few-morsels-for-inflation-hawks/">Latest U.S. Price Data Provides Few Morsels for Inflation Hawks</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 01 Mar 2010 18:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/01/latest-u-s-price-data-provides-few-morsels-for-inflation-hawks/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19378386/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/01/latest-u-s-price-data-provides-few-morsels-for-inflation-hawks/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>consumer spending</category><category>Federal Reserve</category><category>inflation</category><category>inthenews</category><category>PCE</category><category>personal income</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 18:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Families tried to reign in the spending last year]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/07/families-tried-to-reign-in-the-spending-last-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/07/families-tried-to-reign-in-the-spending-last-year/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/07/families-tried-to-reign-in-the-spending-last-year/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/cost/" rel="tag">Costco Wholesale (COST)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/financial-crisis/" rel="tag">Financial Crisis</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/shops.jpg" />There is an article in <em>The Wall Street Journal</em> caught my eye this lovely Tuesday morning, as Sara Murray took a look at how families <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125486089483368577.html?mod=WSJ_hpp_MIDDLTopStories">cut back on spending in 2008</a>. According to the article, consumer prices increased nearly 4% when compared to 2007; but pre-tax income increased less than 1% - or $472 for an average family. Yes, the average American family made $472 more dollars in 2008 than it did in 2007. Breaking it down even further, the overall spending per consumer unit (which includes families, single people, or cohabitants) increased 1.7%, or $848, in 2008. This was the smallest spending increase since 2003. The biggest drop was in apparel spending (4.3%) while families spent 8.1% more on eating at home (which computes out to $279 per family).<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/07/families-tried-to-reign-in-the-spending-last-year/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Families tried to reign in the spending last year</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/07/families-tried-to-reign-in-the-spending-last-year/">Families tried to reign in the spending last year</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 07 Oct 2009 16:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/07/families-tried-to-reign-in-the-spending-last-year/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19187322/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/07/families-tried-to-reign-in-the-spending-last-year/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cost</category><category>inthenews</category><category>irresponsible spending</category><category>IrresponsibleSpending</category><category>personal income</category><category>personal spending</category><category>PersonalIncome</category><category>PersonalSpending</category><category>retail</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 16:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[The week in preview: Pre-holiday reports]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/21/the-week-in-preview-pre-holiday-reports/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/21/the-week-in-preview-pre-holiday-reports/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/21/the-week-in-preview-pre-holiday-reports/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p><p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/christmas_ornament_public_domain.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />There's not a whole lot on the economic calendar this coming week, as Thursday is Christmas day. But things are not entirely silent either.</p>
<p>As this is Christmas card season, it's somehow appropriate that <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-greetings-corporation/am/nys">American Greetings Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/american-greetings-corporation/am/nys">AM</a>) is scheduled to report fiscal third-quarter results. Analysts surveyed by Thomson Reuters expect the nation's number two producer of greeting cards to report earnings of $0.52 per share, essentially the same as a year ago. Estimated revenue for the quarter is $474.5 million, down 2.3% from a year ago. American Greetings missed analysts' estimates in three of the past four quarters -- by 55.4% in the first quarter. After falling to a multiyear low of $7.85 per share in late November, the price closed Friday at $9.92. But the share price is 53.8% lower than a year ago.</p>
<p>Drugstore chain <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/walgreen-co/wag/nys">Walgreen Co.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/walgreen-co/wag/nys">WAG</a>), where one may find American Greetings cards, is expected to also report earnings the same as a year ago, or $0.46 per share, on revenue of $15.1 billion (+7.5%). Walgreen reported a modest increase in <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/walgreens-october-sales-increase-68/rfid155063707">sales in October</a> and <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/walgreens-november-sales-increase-3-7-percent/rfid163525519?channel=pf">again in November</a>. The company only missed profit estimates in one of the past four quarters, and that by only a penny. The consensus recommendation remains to buy WAG, which has a long-term EPS growth rate forecast of 12.5%, better than the S&amp;P 500 but less than that of rival <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cvs-caremark-corporation/cvs/nys">CVS Caremark Corp.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/cvs-caremark-corporation/cvs/nys">CVS</a>). Walgreen's share price has been creeping upward since reaching a multiyear low of $21.28 in October and closed Friday at $26.08. (For more on Walgreen, see Steven Mallas's <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/20/earnings-preview-will-walgreens-q1-be-healthy-or-ailing/">earnings preview</a>.)</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/21/the-week-in-preview-pre-holiday-reports/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>The week in preview: Pre-holiday reports</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/21/the-week-in-preview-pre-holiday-reports/">The week in preview: Pre-holiday reports</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 21 Dec 2008 12:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/21/the-week-in-preview-pre-holiday-reports/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1406654/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/21/the-week-in-preview-pre-holiday-reports/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AM</category><category>American Greetings</category><category>consumer sentiment</category><category>CVS</category><category>CVS Caremark</category><category>featured</category><category>FSI</category><category>FSII</category><category>GDP</category><category>home sales</category><category>jobless claims</category><category>Micron Technology</category><category>MU</category><category>personal income</category><category>Red Hat</category><category>retail sales</category><category>RHT</category><category>SCS</category><category>Steelcase</category><category>TIBCO</category><category>TIBX</category><category>WAG</category><category>Walgreen</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Trey Thoelcke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 12:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Consumer spending rises 0.2%... but so does inflation]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/30/consumer-spending-rises-0-2-but-so-does-inflation/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/30/consumer-spending-rises-0-2-but-so-does-inflation/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/30/consumer-spending-rises-0-2-but-so-does-inflation/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/forecasts/" rel="tag">Forecasts</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p>Just call it a status-quo month for U.S. purchasing power. <br /><br />Personal income, consumer spending and consumer prices all rose 0.2% in April 2008, <a href="http://www.bea.gov/newsreleases/national/pi/pinewsrelease.htm">the U.S. Commerce Department announced Friday</a> -- a report that suggests the economy slowed to a crawl as tax rebate checks started to arrive. <br /><br />Economists <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/markets/ecalendar/index.html">surveyed by Bloomberg News</a> had expected to 0.2% increases in both consumer spending and personal income in April 2008.<br /><br />Further, it was the fifth straight month of sluggish consumer spending performance. Also, in real terms, employee compensation declined 0.1%, its first decline in 12 months. Real disposable incomes are up 1.2% in the last 12 months. <br /><br />Economist Peter Dawson said the April 2008 consumer spending statistic was not a surprise. "Consumers are cutting back, given the large increases in their monthly expenses for food and gasoline, so a 0.2% spending rise is a bit of an achievement," Dawson said. "It could have been much lower, given the lack of improvement in purchasing power."<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/30/consumer-spending-rises-0-2-but-so-does-inflation/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Consumer spending rises 0.2%... but so does inflation</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/30/consumer-spending-rises-0-2-but-so-does-inflation/">Consumer spending rises 0.2%... but so does inflation</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 30 May 2008 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/30/consumer-spending-rises-0-2-but-so-does-inflation/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1210352/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/05/30/consumer-spending-rises-0-2-but-so-does-inflation/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>consumer spending</category><category>energy</category><category>food prices</category><category>gasoline prices</category><category>inflation</category><category>inthenews</category><category>personal income</category><category>U.S. Commerce Department</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[February consumer spending rises a scant 0.1%, pointing to recession]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/28/february-consumer-spending-rises-a-scant-0-1-pointing-to-reces/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/28/february-consumer-spending-rises-a-scant-0-1-pointing-to-reces/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/28/february-consumer-spending-rises-a-scant-0-1-pointing-to-reces/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/recession/" rel="tag">Recession</a></p>Real consumer spending increased a scant 0.1% in February 2008, <a href="http://www.bea.gov/newsreleases/national/pi/pinewsrelease.htm">the U.S. Commerce Department announced Friday</a>, inline with <a href="http://www.econoday.com/clients/basics/bloomberg/reports/US/EN/New_York/personal_income_and_outlays/year/2008/yearly/03/index.html">expectations</a>. It was the third straight month of sub-par consumer demand, suggesting that a major component of U.S. economic growth is faltering, which typically leads to a recession. <br /> <br />Meanwhile, inflation eased in January 2008, with consumer prices increasing 0.1%. Core prices, which exclude food and energy, also increased just 0.1%. For the past 12 months, consumer prices have increased 3.4%, while the core rate has increased 2%, or below the U.S. Federal Reserve's inflation ceiling, i.e. within the Fed's 'comfort zone.' <br /><br />In addition, personal income increased 0.5% in February 2008, with wages and salaries increasing 0.3%, asset income rising 0.2%, while rental income plunging 5.3%. This increase in income was above expectations of 0.3%. <br /> <br /><strong>Economic Analysis: </strong>One negative and one positive data point for the U.S. economy in the report. The essentially flat 0.1% increase in consumer spending for the third straight month is indicative of a slowdown in consumer demand, which suggests, at minimum, continued economic sluggishness ahead. A bright point: core inflation, running at 2.0%, remains below what the U.S. Federal Reserve considers to be excessive. If the core rate doesn't increase, that should provide additional leeway for the Fed to further lower short-term interest rates, should it choose to do so.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/28/february-consumer-spending-rises-a-scant-0-1-pointing-to-reces/">February consumer spending rises a scant 0.1%, pointing to recession</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 28 Mar 2008 09:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/28/february-consumer-spending-rises-a-scant-0-1-pointing-to-reces/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1151449/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/03/28/february-consumer-spending-rises-a-scant-0-1-pointing-to-reces/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>consumer spending</category><category>core inflation</category><category>CPI</category><category>Fed</category><category>inflation</category><category>inthenews</category><category>personal income</category><category>U.S. Commerce Department</category><category>U.S. Federal Reserve</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 09:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[U.S. personal income rises, but inflation eats away most of the gain]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/29/u-s-personal-income-rises-but-inflation-eats-away-most-of-the/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/29/u-s-personal-income-rises-but-inflation-eats-away-most-of-the/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/29/u-s-personal-income-rises-but-inflation-eats-away-most-of-the/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a></p>Personal income rose in January 2008, but inflation also rose in January 2008, canceling-out the purchasing power of most of the personal income gains.<br /><br />Nominal consumer spending increased 0.4% in January 2008 as did personal income, the U.S. Commerce Department announced Friday, <a href="http://www.bea.gov/newsreleases/national/pi/pinewsrelease.htm">in a statement</a>. Each was above what economists <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/markets/ecalendar/index.html">surveyed by Bloomberg News</a> have estimated -- a 0.2% increase for each.<br /><br />However, inflation also rose in January 2008, canceling-out the purchasing power of most of the personal income gains.<br /><br />Meanwhile, the PCE Deflator, which the U.S. Federal Reserve follows closely as a gauge of inflation, increased 0.4%. During the past 12 months, prices have risen 3.7%, roughly twice the pace of the 1.8% 12-month inflation rate as of August 2007. <br /><br />Core inflation -- which excludes food and energy prices -- increased 0.3% in January 2008 and is running at a 2.2% rate during the past 12 months. That 2.2% rate is above the U.S. Federal Reserve's 1.5-2% target zone for PCE Deflator core inflation, commonly referred to as the Fed's "comfort zone."<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/29/u-s-personal-income-rises-but-inflation-eats-away-most-of-the/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>U.S. personal income rises, but inflation eats away most of the gain</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/29/u-s-personal-income-rises-but-inflation-eats-away-most-of-the/">U.S. personal income rises, but inflation eats away most of the gain</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/29/u-s-personal-income-rises-but-inflation-eats-away-most-of-the/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1127913/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/02/29/u-s-personal-income-rises-but-inflation-eats-away-most-of-the/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>consumer spending</category><category>CPI</category><category>inflation</category><category>inthenews</category><category>PCE Deflator</category><category>personal income</category><category>purchasing power</category><category>U.S. Federal Reserve</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Would CO2 limits curb global GDP growth?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/02/would-co2-limits-curb-global-gdp-growth/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/02/would-co2-limits-curb-global-gdp-growth/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/02/would-co2-limits-curb-global-gdp-growth/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/international-markets/" rel="tag">International Markets</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/india/" rel="tag">India</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/china/" rel="tag">China</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/brazil/" rel="tag">Brazil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/russia/" rel="tag">Russia</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/middle-east/" rel="tag">Middle East</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/venezuela/" rel="tag">Venezuela</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/thailand/" rel="tag">Thailand</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/mexico/" rel="tag">Mexico</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/canada/" rel="tag">Canada</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/japan/" rel="tag">Japan</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/commodities/" rel="tag">Commodities</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/oil/" rel="tag">Oil</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/eastern-europe/" rel="tag">Eastern Europe</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/agriculture/" rel="tag">Agriculture</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/israel/" rel="tag">Israel</a></p><em>Financial Times</em> <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/0447f562-ad85-11dc-9386-0000779fd2ac.html">columnist Martin Wolf,</a> an economist, poses the question, "Will CO2 emissions limits lead to a zero-sum global economy?" - an economy characterized by stagnant (or declining) incomes, and armed conflict among nations?<br /><br />Wolf argues that increased energy consumption per capita, primarily oil from fossil fuel, has been a key causal factor in creating the plus-sum economic world we live in, which he calls the positive-sum economy. Or in other words, rising energy consumption has helped produce rising productivity / real incomes / wealth, and the expanding global economy that we know today. <br /><br />In addition, Wolf further argues that rising energy consumption transformed politics -- assisting both the birth of democratic politics at home and more-consensual foreign relations among states -- by increasing the size of the economic pie. Elites in a country, Wolf argues, became more willing to tolerate the enfranchisement of the masses because it was in the elites' economic interest to do so: i.e. that energy consumption created a more-productive (and more-valuable) citizenry with higher incomes.<br /><br />Internationally, a nation's gains from the increased trade that characterizes the high-energy consumption era far exceed its gains from making war with another nation: the plus-sum global economy that trade produces supports today's norm of trade as opposed to the limited-sum world's norm of conflict and war. <strong><br /></strong><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/02/would-co2-limits-curb-global-gdp-growth/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Would CO2 limits curb global GDP growth?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/02/would-co2-limits-curb-global-gdp-growth/">Would CO2 limits curb global GDP growth?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 02 Jan 2008 16:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/02/would-co2-limits-curb-global-gdp-growth/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1075607/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/01/02/would-co2-limits-curb-global-gdp-growth/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>carbon dioxide</category><category>carbon limits</category><category>climate change</category><category>CO2</category><category>CO2 emissions</category><category>emerging markets</category><category>European Union</category><category>Financial Times</category><category>France</category><category>GDP</category><category>global economy</category><category>global warming</category><category>greenhouse gases</category><category>MartinWolf</category><category>oil</category><category>personal income</category><category>resources</category><category>Sweden</category><category>trade</category><category>United States</category><category>Wolf</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 16:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[U.S. productivity surges 6.3% in Q3]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/05/u-s-productivity-surges-6-3-in-q3/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/05/u-s-productivity-surges-6-3-in-q3/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/05/u-s-productivity-surges-6-3-in-q3/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/other-issues/" rel="tag">Other Issues</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/economic-data/" rel="tag">Economic Data</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/federal-reserve/" rel="tag">Federal Reserve</a></p>U.S. non-farm productivity surged to an annualized rate of 6.3% in Q3, the strongest productivity gain in four years, <a href="http://www.bls.gov/news.release/prod2.nr0.htm">the U.S. Labor Department announced Wednesday</a>.
<p>The revised statistic is a substantial increase from the preliminary 4.9% Q3 productivity increase announced by the department a month ago.<br /><br />"All in all, it's a great productivity number for the quarter, which leads to a good annualized rate," economist David H. Wang told BloggingStocks Wednesday. "This will relieve some inflationary pressure in the economy, and also give the Federal Reserve some leeway regarding interest rates. The Fed can now see that labor is not adding that much to inflationary pressures in the U.S. economy."</p>
<p>Over the past 12 months non-farm business productivity has increased 2.7%, the largest four-quarter gain since late 2004. During Q3, manufacturing productivity increased 5%, while non-financial productivity gained 4.2%.</p>
<p><strong>Economic Analysis: </strong>The high Q3 productivity stat is good news for the economy, employers, and employees. With high productivity, the U.S. economy can grow rapidly without inflation, easing pressure to raise prices. This simultaneously means worker productivity per hour is rising, which usually leads to raises, higher real incomes, and higher living standards. After registering productivity giants that averaged 2.5% per year for 1996-2005, productivity had slowed to about 1% in 2006. With the revised Q3 2007 stat, there's now additional evidence that productivity has resumed advancing at an impressive rate.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/05/u-s-productivity-surges-6-3-in-q3/">U.S. productivity surges 6.3% in Q3</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 05 Dec 2007 11:05:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.bls.gov/news.release/prod2.nr0.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/05/u-s-productivity-surges-6-3-in-q3/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1055397/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/05/u-s-productivity-surges-6-3-in-q3/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>consumer price index</category><category>GDP</category><category>industrial output</category><category>inflation</category><category>inthenews</category><category>personal income</category><category>productivity</category><category>profits</category><category>U.S. economy</category><category>U.S. Federal Reserve</category><category>U.S. Labor Department</category><category>wages</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Lazzaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 11:05:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Slow income and consumption growth in September]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/30/slow-income-and-consumption-growth-in-september/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/30/slow-income-and-consumption-growth-in-september/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/30/slow-income-and-consumption-growth-in-september/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketmatters/" rel="tag">Market Matters</a></p><p>The Commerce Department <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/consumer-spending-incomes-rise-in/n20061030084809990006?cid=403">reported today</a> that personal income was up 0.5 percent, slightly higher than August's revised 0.4 percent, but personal consumption slowed to just 0.1 percent in September, less than the revised 0.2 percent for August. These numbers are exactly the opposite what many economist were expecting. Economists expected to see a 0.4 percent increase for personal income and a 0.2 percent increase for consumer spending.</p>
<p>This report reflects the trend we saw in last week's GDP report from the Commerce Department which showed that economic growth was the weakest in three years. It also reinforces the Fed's decision to hold short-term interest rates steady amid signs that the economy is slowing. </p>
<p>Spending on durable goods -- those designed to last three years or longer -- increased by 1.6 percent, which is much better than August's 1.4 percent decline. But spending on non-durable goods declined by 1.2 percent after gaining in August by 0.2 percent. </p>
<p>Personal savings continues to be in the negative with a drop of 0.2 percent. That's now 18 months that savings has been in the red. I suspect personal income growth would need to increase much more dramatically to see the savings rate turnaround.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/30/slow-income-and-consumption-growth-in-september/">Slow income and consumption growth in September</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 30 Oct 2006 11:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/consumer-spending-incomes-rise-in/n20061030084809990006?cid=403>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/30/slow-income-and-consumption-growth-in-september/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/693097/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/30/slow-income-and-consumption-growth-in-september/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>commerce department</category><category>CommerceDepartment</category><category>consumption</category><category>personal income</category><category>PersonalIncome</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lita Epstein]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 11:01:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Before the bell 10-30-06:  Economy, Europe, Wal-Mart affecting stock futures]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/30/before-the-bell-10-30-06-economy-europe-wal-mart-affecting-s/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/30/before-the-bell-10-30-06-economy-europe-wal-mart-affecting-s/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/30/before-the-bell-10-30-06-economy-europe-wal-mart-affecting-s/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/before-the-bell/" rel="tag">Before the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/dell/" rel="tag">Dell (DELL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/hpq/" rel="tag">Hewlett-Packard (HPQ)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ebay/" rel="tag">eBay (EBAY)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ge/" rel="tag">General Electric (GE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/twx/" rel="tag">Time Warner (TWX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amzn/" rel="tag">Amazon.com (AMZN)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/intc/" rel="tag">Intel (INTC)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/f/" rel="tag">Ford Motor (F)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">General Motors (GM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/xom/" rel="tag">Exxon Mobil (XOM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/tm/" rel="tag">Toyota Motor Corp. (TM)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/amd/" rel="tag">Advanced Micro Dev (AMD)</a></p><p><img id="vimage_1" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/10/bell-red.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" /><strong>Early morning futures are negative</strong>, pointing to a lower start stocks.</p>
<p>The market is possibly reacting to two things, the first being the sell-off that started around noon Friday, and the other is the sell-off in overseas markets. Update: oil prices are lower and futures may be changing the negative trend, although they are still negative at 8:15 a.m..</p>
<p>On Friday, data concerning the health of the <strong>economy</strong> in the form of Gross Domestic Product was reported, showing a lower growth than anticipated. Despite the concern about the economy'd growth slowing down, the market braved the news until at noon the sell-off began. This could have also been triggered by a Goldman Sachs <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2006/10/27/technology/bc.tech.chips.goldman.reut/index.htm?source=aol_quote">report</a> about lower demand for PC boards in China in the coming year. This report sparked the sell-off in the tech, and then possibly expanded to the whole market.</p>
<p>Today, major <strong>stock markets in Asia closed lower</strong>, with Japan's Nikkei 225 down nearly 2% . <strong>European markets are also negative</strong> with the German DAX 30 declining 0.7%. as is the FTSE 100 in London.</p>
<p>This morning, <strong>September personal income and spending</strong> will be reported at 8:30 a.m.. Analysts forecast both to grow at 0.3%. A measure of inflation, core PCE price index will also be reported, although may not have the same weight as other inflation measures.</p>
<p><strong>Topping the news this morning are Wal-Mart, Verizon (both are Dow components), American Power Conversion and Yahoo!</strong>:</p>
<p><strong>Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.</strong> (NYSE:WMT) reported a pallid <a href="http://articles.news.aol.com/business/_a/wal-mart-posts-softest-same-store-sales/20061030063509990001?cid=403">0.5% increase October s</a>ales, the smallest gain in six years. Wal-Mart shares were down 1.7% in Frankfurt this morning. </p>
<p><strong>Yahoo!, Inc.</strong> (NASDAQ:YHOO) was <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/News/Story/Story.aspx?guid=%7BD5D2AACE%2DC6C8%2D41F1%2D9817%2D249045993DDA%7D&amp;siteid=mktw&amp;dateid=39020%2E2436521759%2D883791150">upgraded to Buy from Neutral by Merrill Lynch</a>, which calls the present stock price an attractive entry point. Yahoo! shares were up 1.4% in Frankfurt.</p>
<p><strong>Verizon Communications, Inc.</strong> (NYSE:VZ) just reported <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/verizon-communications-posts-strong/n20061030072709990007">third-quarter financial results</a>. Earnings (non-GAAP) were $2.0 billion, or 68 cents per share, a 7.5% increase over last year's Q3 earnings of $1.8 billion, or 66 cents per share. Analysts were expecting flat earnings.</p>
<p>Finally, French electric equipment maker Schneider Electric SA had agreed to buy <strong>American Power Conversion Corp.</strong> (NASDAQ:APCC) for <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/schneider-to-buy-apc-for-61-billion/n20061030065909990004?cid=403">$6.1 billion in cash</a>. According to Schneider, the $31 per share offer, which represents a 30% premium over APC's Friday closing price, has been approved by the APC board.</p>
<p><strong>Other stories:</strong></p>
<p>A <strong>Goldman Sachs report</strong> from Friday suggesting that <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2006/10/27/technology/bc.tech.chips.goldman.reut/index.htm?source=aol_quote">shipments of the main circuit boards for personal computers will be weaker than expected this year</a>, could be indicating a sector weakness. Already on Friday the report sent computer makers <strong>Hewlett-Packard Co. </strong>(NYSE:HPQ) and <strong>Dell Inc.</strong> (NASDAQ:DELL) stocks down 1.8% and 1.1% respectively. Chip makers, <strong>Intel Corp.</strong> (NASDAQ:INTC) and <strong>Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.</strong> (NYSE:AMD) stocks dropped around 3%. The report could also impact <strong>Microsoft Corp.</strong> (NASDAQ:MSFT) shares as many awaited its new operating system, Vista.</p>
<p>An <a href="http://www.thestreet.com/_aol/smallbusinesstech/smallbusinesstech/10318335.html?cm_ven=AOL&amp;cm_cat=FREE&amp;cm_ite=NA?cm_ven=AOL&amp;cm_cat=FREE&amp;cm_ite=NA">article</a> in <em>TheStreet.com</em> examines the recent rallies of <strong>Yahoo!, eBay, Inc.</strong> (NASDAQ:EBAY) and <strong>Amazon.com, Inc.</strong> (NASDAQ:AMZN), suggesting they are riding the positive sentiment from <strong>Google, Inc.</strong> (NASDAQ:GOOG).</p>
<p>In the <strong>auto industry</strong>, two more foreign automakers would shortly announce their plans to <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/2-more-automakers-to-produce-in-russia/n20061030070209990002">produce cars in Russia</a>. <strong>General Motors Corp.</strong> (NYSE:GM) and <strong>Ford Motor Co.</strong> (NYSE:F) are already producing there, and <strong>Toyota Motor Corp.</strong> (ADR) (NYSE:TM) will start shortly.</p>
<p>Norway's Statoil and its partners Norsk Hydro and <strong>ExxonMobil Corp. </strong>(NYSE:XOM) have <a href="http://today.reuters.com/news/articlehybrid.aspx?type=comktNews&amp;rpc=33&amp;storyid=2006-10-30T102131Z_01_L30259574_RTRIDST_0_ENERGY-STATOIL-MAINTENANCE.XML">awarded contracts</a> worth about 700 million Norwegian crowns ($107 million) for gas turbine maintenance to <strong>General Electric Co.</strong> (NYSE:GE) and a unit of German engine group MTU.</p>
<p><strong>Time Warner, Inc.</strong>'s (NYSE:TWX) Warner Bros, Martin Scorsese's mob tale "The Departed" held strongly again, <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/saw-iii-cuts-up-box-office-competition/n20061030044609990002">taking in $9.8 million to place second</a> for the third-straight weekend. The Warner Bros. film lifted its total to $91.1 million. In first place was Liongate's "Saw III."</p>
<p>Finally, the Blogging Stocks team reported some <a href="http://aapl.bloggingstocks.com/">interesting stories</a> on <strong>Apple Computer, Inc.</strong> (NASDAQ:AAPL) over the weekend.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/30/before-the-bell-10-30-06-economy-europe-wal-mart-affecting-s/">Before the bell 10-30-06:  Economy, Europe, Wal-Mart affecting stock futures</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 30 Oct 2006 08:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/30/before-the-bell-10-30-06-economy-europe-wal-mart-affecting-s/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/693029/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/30/before-the-bell-10-30-06-economy-europe-wal-mart-affecting-s/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aapl</category><category>advanced micro devices</category><category>AdvancedMicroDevices</category><category>amazon.com</category><category>amd</category><category>amzn</category><category>apple</category><category>dell</category><category>ebay</category><category>economy</category><category>exxonmobil</category><category>f</category><category>ford</category><category>futures</category><category>gdp</category><category>ge</category><category>general electric</category><category>general motors</category><category>GeneralElectric</category><category>GeneralMotors</category><category>gm</category><category>goldman sachs</category><category>GoldmanSachs</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>hewlett-packard</category><category>hpq</category><category>intc</category><category>intel</category><category>merrill lynch</category><category>MerrillLynch</category><category>microsoft</category><category>msft</category><category>oil prices</category><category>OilPrices</category><category>personal income</category><category>PersonalIncome</category><category>time warner</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>tm</category><category>toyota motors</category><category>ToyotaMotors</category><category>twx</category><category>verizon</category><category>vz</category><category>wal-mart</category><category>wmt</category><category>xom</category><category>yahoo!</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Melly Alazraki]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 08:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Before the bell: AAPL, GOOG, YHOO, EBAY]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/01/before-the-bell-aapl-goog-yhoo-ebay/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/01/before-the-bell-aapl-goog-yhoo-ebay/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/01/before-the-bell-aapl-goog-yhoo-ebay/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/before-the-bell/" rel="tag">Before the Bell</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ebay/" rel="tag">eBay (EBAY)</a></p><p>Stocks were a bit higher this morning in pre-market trading, but they didn't seem to have much conviction and weredrifting lower as the bell approached.&nbsp;On the positive side, overseas markets were higher and news of <ahref="http://articles.news.aol.com/business/article.adp?id=20060501043809990016&amp;cid=">Boeing's possible $1.7billion purchase of Aviall</a> was making things more exciting. </p>
<p>Plus,&nbsp;Wal-Mart's 6.8% jump in same-store sales, reported on Saturday, was boosting optimism that the consumerwould hang tough as energy prices surge.&nbsp;At 8:30 a.m., the <ahref="http://money.cnn.com/2006/05/01/news/economy/personal_spending.reut/index.htm">government reportedhigher&nbsp;personal income and consumer spending</a>&nbsp;in March. Both came in higher than expected and a nice bumpfrom February. This news should give investors added motivation to hang tough today, despite global concerns.</p>
<p>But oil prices were on the upswing this morning,&nbsp;topping $72 a barrel -- again. And confrontation over Iran'snuclear intentions was heating up. Meanwhile businesses were wondering how&nbsp;disruptive plans for an <ahref="http://articles.news.aol.com/business/article.adp?id=20060501071209990012&amp;_ccc=1&amp;cid=403">immigrant laborboycott</a>&nbsp;today would be. Spiking gold prices -- now up to $662 -- were a sign that some investors are worryingabout a falling dollar and global stability.</p>
<p>Here's a quick look at key Blogging Stocks this morning:&nbsp;Here's a quick look at key Blogging Stocks thismorning:&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Apple</strong><span style="FONT-SIZE: 9pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"> (<ahref="http://finance.aol.com/usw/quotes/quotesandnews?sym=aapl&amp;exch=USA&amp;pid=&amp;tabs=quotesandnews&amp;dr=&amp;symbs=&amp;compidx1=&amp;compidx2=&amp;compidx3=">AAPL</a>)&nbsp;isup 38 cents&nbsp;to $70.77 as of&nbsp;8:30</span><time minute="40" hour="8"></time><span style="FONT-SIZE: 9pt;FONT-FAMILY: Arial"> a.m.</span><span style="FONT-SIZE: 9pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"> A pessimistic Dow Jones story, <ahref="http://Apple's Been Bruised, But Will May Bring A Beating?">"Apple's Been Bruised, But Will May Bring ABeating?,"</a> doesn't seem to be deterring investors who seem set to continue last week's rally in the stockprice.</span></p>
<p><strong><span style="FONT-SIZE: 9pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">Google</span></strong><span style="FONT-SIZE: 9pt;FONT-FAMILY: Arial"> (<ahref="http://finance.aol.com/usw/quotes/quotesandnews?sym=goog&amp;exch=USA&amp;pid=&amp;tabs=quotesandnews&amp;dr=&amp;symbs=&amp;compidx1=&amp;compidx2=&amp;compidx3=">GOOG</a>)is up $1.68 to $419.62 as of </span><time minute="54" hour="8"></time><span style="FONT-SIZE: 9pt; FONT-FAMILY:Arial">8:37 a.m.</span><span style="FONT-SIZE: 9pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"> It is <ahref="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/google-complains-to-officials-on-new/n20060501081509990017">weighing in onMicrosoft's antitrust battle</a> over Internet Explorer.</span></p>
<p><span style="FONT-SIZE: 9pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"></span><strong><span style="FONT-SIZE: 9pt; FONT-FAMILY:Arial">Yahoo!</span></strong><span style="FONT-SIZE: 9pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"> (<ahref="http://finance.aol.com/usw/quotes/quotesandnews?sym=yhoo&amp;exch=USA&amp;pid=&amp;tabs=quotesandnews&amp;dr=&amp;symbs=&amp;compidx1=&amp;compidx2=&amp;compidx3=">YHOO</a>)is&nbsp;up 27&nbsp;cents to $33.05 as of 8:36 a.m. Check out <ahref="http://money.cnn.com/2006/05/01/technology/yahoo.reut/index.htm">Yahoo! Tech, it's new site for computer andconsumer electronics shoppers</a>.</span></p>
<p><span style="FONT-SIZE: 9pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><strong>eBay</strong> (<ahref="http://finance.aol.com/usw/quotes/quotesandnews?sym=ebay&amp;exch=USA&amp;pid=&amp;tabs=quotesandnews&amp;dr=&amp;symbs=&amp;compidx1=&amp;compidx2=&amp;compidx3=">EBAY</a>)is up 35 cents to $34.76 as of&nbsp;8:37 a.m.</span></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/01/before-the-bell-aapl-goog-yhoo-ebay/">Before the bell: AAPL, GOOG, YHOO, EBAY</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Mon, 01 May 2006 08:47:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/01/before-the-bell-aapl-goog-yhoo-ebay/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/613596/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/01/before-the-bell-aapl-goog-yhoo-ebay/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>apple</category><category>aviall</category><category>boeing</category><category>ebay</category><category>google</category><category>immigrant</category><category>personal income</category><category>PersonalIncome</category><category>yahoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Amey Stone]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 08:47:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
