<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Eastman Kodak Rallies After Earnings]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/28/eastman-kodak-rallies-after-earnings/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/28/eastman-kodak-rallies-after-earnings/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/28/eastman-kodak-rallies-after-earnings/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ek/" rel="tag">Eastman Kodak (EK)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/kodak-logo-240.jpg" />Eastman Kodak (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/eastman-kodak-company/ek/nys">EK</a>) is having a picture-perfect trading session, at least at the time of this writing: shares of the company were up 12% to $4.45, with strong volume backing the move. I haven't been a fan of this name, but it is proving me wrong at the moment.<br />
<br />
Earlier today, Eastman Kodak issued its third-quarter report. According to the <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/article/kodak-posts-narrower-3q-loss-of-43m/595688/">Associated Press</a>, the adjusted loss came out to 2 cents per share. The expectation was for a loss of 31 cents per share. That's a pretty big difference; I guess I can see why the market was so happy. In addition, the actual corporate <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/rtn/pr/kodak-reports-improved-profits-and-cash-flow-in-third-quarter-2010/rfid381269578/?channel=pf">press release</a> touts the improved performance in cash flow.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/28/eastman-kodak-rallies-after-earnings/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Eastman Kodak Rallies After Earnings</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/28/eastman-kodak-rallies-after-earnings/">Eastman Kodak Rallies After Earnings</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 28 Oct 2010 15:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.dailyfinance.com/article/kodak-posts-narrower-3q-loss-of-43m/595688/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/28/eastman-kodak-rallies-after-earnings/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19693849/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/10/28/eastman-kodak-rallies-after-earnings/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Eastman Kodak</category><category>EK</category><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>photography</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 15:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Eastman Kodak Up Big on Q4 News]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/28/eastman-kodak-up-big-on-q4-news/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/28/eastman-kodak-up-big-on-q4-news/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/28/eastman-kodak-up-big-on-q4-news/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sne/" rel="tag">Sony Corp ADR (SNE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ek/" rel="tag">Eastman Kodak (EK)</a></p><img hspace="4" vspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/01/kodak-logo-240.jpg"  alt="" />Well, Eastman Kodak (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/eastman-kodak-company/ek/nys">EK</a>) is having one picture-perfect trading session. At the time of this writing, shares of the photography concern, whose colleagues include Canon (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/canon-inc/caj/nys">CAJ</a>) and Sony (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys">SNE</a>), were up over 16% on high volume. Yes, it's Kodak I'm talking about, the low-priced equity that many have written off as an investment idea. The reason for all the buying action? <a href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/kodakand-x2019-s-fourth-quarter-revenues-increase-6percent-profits-surge/rfid293785577?channel=pf">Fourth-quarter numbers</a>. Were they that good?
<p>Sales increased 6%. On a <a href="http://finance.aol.com/glossary/Generally%20Accepted%20Accounting%20Principles%20-%20GAAP">GAAP</a> basis, Kodak made $1.36 per share from continuing operations. This compares to a loss of $3.40 per share booked in the year-ago period. According to <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE60R4BK20100128?type=globalMarketsNews">Reuters</a>, the non-GAAP number was $1.08 per share, beating the estimate of 18 cents by what is obviously a very wide margin.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/28/eastman-kodak-up-big-on-q4-news/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Eastman Kodak Up Big on Q4 News</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/28/eastman-kodak-up-big-on-q4-news/">Eastman Kodak Up Big on Q4 News</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 28 Jan 2010 15:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/kodakand-x2019-s-fourth-quarter-revenues-increase-6percent-profits-surge/rfid293785577?channel=pf>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/28/eastman-kodak-up-big-on-q4-news/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19336109/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/01/28/eastman-kodak-up-big-on-q4-news/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CAJ</category><category>Canon</category><category>eastman kodak</category><category>EastmanKodak</category><category>EK</category><category>inhenews</category><category>photography</category><category>SNE</category><category>Sony</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 15:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Eastman Kodak's Q3 continues to expose negatives]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/eastman-kodaks-q3-continues-to-expose-negatives/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/eastman-kodaks-q3-continues-to-expose-negatives/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/eastman-kodaks-q3-continues-to-expose-negatives/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sne/" rel="tag">Sony Corp ADR (SNE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ek/" rel="tag">Eastman Kodak (EK)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/ek-eastman-kodak-logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" alt="" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/eastman-kodak-company/ek/nys">Eastman Kodak</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/eastman-kodak-company/ek/nys">EK</a>), which counts <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys">Sony</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys">SNE</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/canon-inc/caj/nys">Canon</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/canon-inc/caj/nys">CAJ</a>) as related companies, continues its slide into fundamental hell. According to the third-quarter <a href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/kodak-reports-3rd-quarter-2009-results-operational-improvements-drive-positive-cash-generation-before-restructuring/rfid265510268?channel=pf">earnings release</a>, sales declined a scary 26%, and a <a href="http://finance.aol.com/glossary/Generally%20Accepted%20Accounting%20Principles%20-%20GAAP">GAAP</a> loss of 41 cents per share was reported. Last year at this time, Kodak produced positive income of 35 cents per share. According to <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/earningsSeason/idUSN2931183220091029">Reuters</a>, the adjusted loss of 23 cents per share was worse than analyst projections. Wall Street was hoping for something closer to a loss of 19 cents per share.</p>
<p>Don't you get the feeling management just doesn't know what to do? Kodak has become a conundrum of epic proportions. Just how is someone supposed to improve a situation that has gone so downhill?</p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/eastman-kodaks-q3-continues-to-expose-negatives/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Eastman Kodak's Q3 continues to expose negatives</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/eastman-kodaks-q3-continues-to-expose-negatives/">Eastman Kodak's Q3 continues to expose negatives</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 30 Oct 2009 09:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/kodak-reports-3rd-quarter-2009-results-operational-improvements-drive-positive-cash-generation-before-restructuring/rfid265510268?channel=pf>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/eastman-kodaks-q3-continues-to-expose-negatives/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19215877/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/10/30/eastman-kodaks-q3-continues-to-expose-negatives/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CAJ</category><category>Canon</category><category>eastman kodak</category><category>EastmanKodak</category><category>EK</category><category>inthenews</category><category>photography</category><category>SNE</category><category>Sony</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 09:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Photo Sharing vs Social Media: Who Wins?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/06/photo-sharing-vs-social-media-who-wins/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/06/photo-sharing-vs-social-media-who-wins/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/06/photo-sharing-vs-social-media-who-wins/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/yhoo/" rel="tag">Yahoo! (YHOO)</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2009/06/df-surprise-product-hits-facebook-200.jpg" alt="" />Have you ever looked at your <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">Yahoo!</a> (NASDAQ: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/yahoo-inc/yhoo/nas">YHOO</a>) <a target="_blank" href="http://www.flickr.com/">Flickr</a> account and thought, "Why am I doing this? I can just throw my pics up on Facebook"? If this has crossed your mind, you're not alone. In fact, many photo-sharing sites - <a target="_blank" href="http://www.snapfish.com">Snapfish</a> (NYSE: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/hewlett-packard-company/hpq/nys">HPQ</a>), <a target="_blank" href="http://www.photobucket.com">Photobucket</a>, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.picasa.com">Picasa</a> (NASDAQ: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas">GOOG</a>) and Shutterfly, as well as Flickr - are asking the same questions. With the development and enhancement of photo management capabilities in major social networking websites, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.reuters.com/article/ousivMolt/idUSTRE5824TB20090903?pageNumber=2&amp;virtualBrandChannel=10522">niche players need to find new ways to stay relevant</a>. </p>
<p>The situation is still far from grim. Fed by traffic from their behemoth owners, the photo-sharing sites remain substantial forces, and they are currently home to more than 20 billion pictures. There's still plenty of interest in these environments ... which has been bolstered by specific features that make the likes of Flickr attractive to both professional photographers and amateur shooters. The ability to order prints and personalize portfolios, for example, still provides an edge over sites like <a target="_blank" href="http://www.facebook.com">Facebook</a> and <a target="_blank" href="http://www.myspace.com">MySpace</a> (NYSE: <a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/newstar-financial-inc/news/nas">NEWS</a>). </p>
<p>Nonetheless, the threats from the social networking space are quite real. </p>
<p> </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/06/photo-sharing-vs-social-media-who-wins/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Photo Sharing vs Social Media: Who Wins?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/06/photo-sharing-vs-social-media-who-wins/">Photo Sharing vs Social Media: Who Wins?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sun, 06 Sep 2009 19:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.reuters.com/article/ousivMolt/idUSTRE5824TB20090903?pageNumber=2&amp;virtualBrandChannel=10522>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/06/photo-sharing-vs-social-media-who-wins/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19152748/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/09/06/photo-sharing-vs-social-media-who-wins/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>facebook</category><category>flickr</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>hewlett-packard</category><category>hp</category><category>hpq</category><category>microsoft</category><category>msft</category><category>myspace</category><category>photo</category><category>photobucket</category><category>photography</category><category>photos</category><category>picasa</category><category>snapfish</category><category>social media</category><category>social network</category><category>social networking</category><category>SocialMedia</category><category>SocialNetwork</category><category>SocialNetworking</category><category>yahoo</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 19:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Eastman Kodak misses in Q2 -- surprised?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/01/eastman-kodak-misses-in-q2-surprised/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/01/eastman-kodak-misses-in-q2-surprised/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/01/eastman-kodak-misses-in-q2-surprised/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sne/" rel="tag">Sony Corp ADR (SNE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ek/" rel="tag">Eastman Kodak (EK)</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/ek-eastman-kodak-logo.jpg" alt="" />So, when you look at the second-quarter <a href="http://money.aol.com/rtn/pr/kodak-reports-2nd-quarter-2009-results-reflecting-global-economic-realities-company-expects-improved-second-half-of-2009/rfid236935915?channel=pf">press release</a> from <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/eastman-kodak-company/ek/nys">Eastman Kodak</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/eastman-kodak-company/ek/nys">EK</a>), you notice something right off the bat. Part of the headline reads as follows: "Kodak Reports 2nd-Quarter 2009 Results, Reflecting Global Economic Realities." I don't think a shareholder can feel too encouraged after mentally processing the implied image that the results are like a mirror being held up to the ugly face of the recession, do you?</p>
<p>I didn't think so. Anyway, sales declined 29%, and I don't think we can use the currency issue to save the day on this particular top line. On an adjusted basis, the 43 cents from continuing operations that was lost during the quarter missed expectations by 7 cents, according to <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsNews/idUSN3033092620090730">Reuters</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/01/eastman-kodak-misses-in-q2-surprised/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Eastman Kodak misses in Q2 -- surprised?</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/01/eastman-kodak-misses-in-q2-surprised/">Eastman Kodak misses in Q2 -- surprised?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 01 Aug 2009 11:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/01/eastman-kodak-misses-in-q2-surprised/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19116189/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/08/01/eastman-kodak-misses-in-q2-surprised/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CAJ</category><category>camera</category><category>Canon</category><category>eastman kodak</category><category>EK</category><category>inthenews</category><category>kodachrome</category><category>photography</category><category>SNE</category><category>Sony</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 11:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Eastman Kodak's Q1 snapshot shows company in decline ]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/01/eastman-kodaks-q1-snapshot-shows-company-in-decline/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/01/eastman-kodaks-q1-snapshot-shows-company-in-decline/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/01/eastman-kodaks-q1-snapshot-shows-company-in-decline/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sne/" rel="tag">Sony Corp ADR (SNE)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ek/" rel="tag">Eastman Kodak (EK)</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/01/ek-eastman-kodak-logo.jpg" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/eastman-kodak-company/ek/nys">Eastman Kodak</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/eastman-kodak-company/ek/nys">EK</a>), whose colleagues include <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/canon-inc/caj/nys">Canon</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/canon-inc/caj/nys">CAJ</a>) and <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys">Sony</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sony-corporation/sne/nys">SNE</a>), did not start its new fiscal year with a picturesque <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/kodak-reports-1st-quarter-2009-results/rfid209109943">first quarter</a>. No, it was more of an ugly, frayed-at-the-edges, nightmarish image of doom and gloom. And although the photography company does have a point when it states right at the beginning of the release that the global economic malaise is affecting its prospects, let's also be realistic. Kodak has been doing badly for a long, long time. This isn't just about the economy. This is about a company that still hasn't properly adjusted to a new, thriving business model.
<p>According to this <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aDmN.TCJbH9Q&amp;refer=home">article</a>, Kodak's adjusted loss of $0.95 per share from continuing operations missed Wall Street's call. By a lot. Some in the analyst community thought that Kodak would lose $0.44 per share. Others thought the company would lose less than even that figure. Doesn't matter what source you look at, the facts in the case make it clear that Kodak is not doing well. Worldwide sales shed just under 30% of their value. The digital segment fared very poorly in Q1. </p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/01/eastman-kodaks-q1-snapshot-shows-company-in-decline/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Eastman Kodak's Q1 snapshot shows company in decline </em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/01/eastman-kodaks-q1-snapshot-shows-company-in-decline/">Eastman Kodak's Q1 snapshot shows company in decline </a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 01 May 2009 14:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/qp/pr/_a/kodak-reports-1st-quarter-2009-results/rfid209109943>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aDmN.TCJbH9Q&amp;refer=home>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/01/eastman-kodaks-q1-snapshot-shows-company-in-decline/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1534184/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/05/01/eastman-kodaks-q1-snapshot-shows-company-in-decline/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CAJ</category><category>Canon</category><category>digital photography</category><category>DigitalPhotography</category><category>dividend investing</category><category>dividend stocks</category><category>DividendInvesting</category><category>dividends</category><category>DividendStocks</category><category>Eastman Kodak</category><category>EastmanKodak</category><category>EK</category><category>imaging</category><category>inthenews</category><category>photography</category><category>SNE</category><category>Sony</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mallas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 14:20:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Kodak poised for a comeback?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/02/kodak-poised-for-a-comeback/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/02/kodak-poised-for-a-comeback/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/02/kodak-poised-for-a-comeback/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ek/" rel="tag">Eastman Kodak (EK)</a></p>Kodak's had a hard time over the past ten years. With the advent of the digital camera, Kodak's tried and true business model of cheap cameras and expensive film didn't translate too well. With lackluster digital offerings, especially when compared to its European and Japanese competitors, some worried Eastman-Kodak's (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/eastman-kodak-company/ek/nys?from=lookup">EK</a>) financial future wasn't exactly a "Kodak Moment." Now,  it looks like Eastman-Kodak is kicking off a new digital push. Their new "fully featured" cams feature facial recognition, intelligent color metering, and integrated GPS.<br /><br />Taking a page from "viral marketing 101," the company produced a pretty funny internal video, then posted it on <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sz6XjXu-oT8">YouTube.</a><br /><object width="425" height="350">
<param value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Sz6XjXu-oT8" name="movie" />
<param value="transparent" name="wmode" /><embed width="425" height="350" wmode="transparent" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Sz6XjXu-oT8"></embed></object><br />It's definitely a refreshing video. Nice to see someone else hated the Advantix system... plus a resurgence of the "Kodak Moment" wouldn't be so bad. Although, I'm not sure the schmaltz really goes to 11 just yet; we'll have to see at next week's Consumer Electronics show.<br /><br />[Via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/02/kodaks-gonna-turn-the-schmaltz-back-up-to-11/">Engadget</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/02/kodak-poised-for-a-comeback/">Kodak poised for a comeback?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Tue, 02 Jan 2007 10:15:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/02/kodak-poised-for-a-comeback/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/727713/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/01/02/kodak-poised-for-a-comeback/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>digital camera</category><category>digital photography</category><category>DigitalCamera</category><category>DigitalPhotography</category><category>eastman</category><category>eastman kodak</category><category>EastmanKodak</category><category>ek</category><category>photography</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Randall Bennett]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 10:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Silly Valley Portrait Studio: What were these young billionaires thinking?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/25/silly-valley-portrait-studio-dont-get-caught-on-film-like-thes/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/25/silly-valley-portrait-studio-dont-get-caught-on-film-like-thes/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/25/silly-valley-portrait-studio-dont-get-caught-on-film-like-thes/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/management/" rel="tag">Management</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ebay/" rel="tag">eBay (EBAY)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/employees/" rel="tag">Employees</a></p><p>As the dust settles from Google's $1.65 billion purchase of Internet video hub YouTube, serious questions remain. Such as: What on earth were co-founders Chad Hurley and Steve Chen thinking when they had these silly photos taken? The same question could be asked of the founders of Google Inc.(NASDAQ:GOOG), PayPal, Digg and Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ:MSFT) after their big payouts. Is it a symptom of striking it rich, or a carefully planned public relations scheme we just don't understand? </p>
<p>You decide: Check out our analysis of what went right with these promotional shots... and what went certifiably wrong.<br /><br /></p>
<center><style type="text/css">  .banner {margin:20px 0px 5px 0px;}</style>
<div style="border: 1px solid rgb(51, 102, 153); padding: 10px; font-family: arial; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 1.2em; line-height: normal; width: 400px; background-color: rgb(239, 247, 232); font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal;"><!--GALLERY-->
<div>
<table>
    <tbody>
        <tr>
            <td width="400"><center><font size="3"><strong>Silly Valley</strong></font><br /><br /><iframe width="320" scrolling="no" height="330" frameborder="0" valign="top" allowtransparency="allowtransparency" src="http://aolsvc.news.aol.com/business/object.adp?frame=article&amp;type=photogalleries&amp;id=9932&amp;data=&amp;title="></iframe><br /></center></td>
        </tr>
    </tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
</center>
<p><br /><iframe width="185" scrolling="no" height="200" frameborder="0" align="left" allowtransparency="allowtransparency" src="http://webcenter.polls.aol.com/modular.jsp?template=212&amp;view=92850&amp;pollId=92933&amp;channel=aol_us_personalfinance" border="1"></iframe>After review, we must ask: What have we learned? Is it simply that young tech titans will forever be geeks at heart? Or could it be that -- suddenly rich and famous -- they feel the need for self-depreciation, to "keep it real<em>"</em> so-to-speak with the millions who obsessively use their products? </p>
<p>That may be unfair. Instead, we place the blame on the photographers -- these mysteriously esoteric people with an arsenal of bright turtlenecks, cargo pants and Jungle Gyms -- whose sole responsibility is to make sure that our beloved dot com billionaires look... well, <strong>not</strong> <strong>silly</strong>. </p>
<p>Then again, who are we to judge? Might one of us become unbearably silly in front of the camera, like Hurley and Chen did recently <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QCVxQ_3Ejkg&amp;mode=related&amp;search=">in front of a TGI Friday's</a>, were we to find ourselves with the ability to purchase five -- that's right -- <strong>five</strong> Cadillac Escalade SRX Crossovers? Possibly. Though not in front of a Friday's.<br /><br /><em>B. Brandon Barker is the author of the novel </em><a href="http://www.operationemu.com/book"><em>Operation EMU</em></a><em>.</em></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/25/silly-valley-portrait-studio-dont-get-caught-on-film-like-thes/">Silly Valley Portrait Studio: What were these young billionaires thinking?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 25 Oct 2006 15:35:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/25/silly-valley-portrait-studio-dont-get-caught-on-film-like-thes/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/689643/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/10/25/silly-valley-portrait-studio-dont-get-caught-on-film-like-thes/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>billionaire</category><category>dotcom</category><category>entrepreneur</category><category>photography</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brandon Barker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 15:35:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Time Warner Cable announces PhotoShow]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/10/time-warner-cable-announces-photoshow/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/10/time-warner-cable-announces-photoshow/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/10/time-warner-cable-announces-photoshow/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<img id="vimage_1" height="170" alt="PhotoShowTV" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2006/08/pstv_flattv_image.jpg" width="220" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" />Following a <a href="http://www.simplestar.com/photoshowtv/">beta-test in Hawaii</a>, Time Warner Cable is <a href="http://www.broadcastnewsroom.com/articles/viewarticle.jsp?id=56052">launching PhotoShow TV</a>. This version of the SimpleStar software product will allow subscribers of Time Warner's digital cable TV service to share personal photos and video clips with other subscribers for free. They'll also be able to post these items onto the video-on-demand service. <br /><br />I don't know anyone who uses these kind of web/television tools, but seems a good resource and may pique the interest of those who don't want to bother signing up for <a href="http://www.flickr.com/">Flickr</a> -- or whose network of family and friends is more television- than web-oriented. As long as everyone you want to share photos with also has digital Time Warner Cable, you'll be fine. Works with Windows Media Center PC, Windows XP, and Xbox 360.<br /><br /><em>Michael Canfield is a private investor, a business and media writer, living in Seattle. He </em><em><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/07/27/about-the-stock-bloggers-michael-canfield/">doesn't own stock</a> in Time Warner.</em><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/10/time-warner-cable-announces-photoshow/">Time Warner Cable announces PhotoShow</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Thu, 10 Aug 2006 16:44:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/10/time-warner-cable-announces-photoshow/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/653106/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/08/10/time-warner-cable-announces-photoshow/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>cable television</category><category>CableTelevision</category><category>photography</category><category>PhotoShow</category><category>product review</category><category>ProductReview</category><category>SimpleStar</category><category>software</category><category>Time Warner</category><category>Time Warner Cable</category><category>TimeWarner</category><category>TimeWarnerCable</category><category>twx</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Canfield]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 16:44:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
