<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Playboy reports fourth-quarter earnings]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/18/playboy-reports-fourth-quarter-earnings/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/18/playboy-reports-fourth-quarter-earnings/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/18/playboy-reports-fourth-quarter-earnings/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/magazines/" rel="tag">Magazines</a></p><img alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/playboy-pla-logo.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" />I'm guessing that sin isn't in, as far as this recession is concerned. <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/playboy-enterprises-inc/pla/nys">Playboy Enterprises</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/playboy-enterprises-inc/pla/nys">PLA</a>) posted a larger fourth-quarter loss thanks to $157.2 million in restructuring costs and other one-time costs. In addition, weaker-than-expected revenue cut into the quarterly performance. PLA's net loss checked in at a sizable $4.37 per share, far larger than the loss of three cents per share a year ago. This most-recent loss rounds out a year when PLA posted a loss in each quarter. PLA's revenue fell to $69.8 million from $85.9 million a year ago, and it fell well short of the expected revenue of $73.7 million.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/18/playboy-reports-fourth-quarter-earnings/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Playboy reports fourth-quarter earnings</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/18/playboy-reports-fourth-quarter-earnings/">Playboy reports fourth-quarter earnings</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/18/playboy-reports-fourth-quarter-earnings/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1464282/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/02/18/playboy-reports-fourth-quarter-earnings/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>earnings</category><category>earnings disappointments</category><category>earnings reports</category><category>EarningsDisappointments</category><category>EarningsReports</category><category>PLA</category><category>playboy</category><category>playboy enterprises</category><category>playboy magazine</category><category>PlayboyEnterprises</category><category>PlayboyMagazine</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Fightmaster]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Best &amp; Worst in Money 2008: Most in need of a makeover]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/05/best-and-worst-in-money-2008-most-in-need-of-a-makeover/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/05/best-and-worst-in-money-2008-most-in-need-of-a-makeover/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/05/best-and-worst-in-money-2008-most-in-need-of-a-makeover/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/wmt/" rel="tag">Wal-Mart (WMT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/sbux/" rel="tag">Starbucks (SBUX)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/shld/" rel="tag">Sears Holdings (SHLD)</a></p><p><em><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2008/12/best-worst-200x267-need-of-a-makeover.jpg" alt="" />This post is part of AOL Money &amp; Finance's <strong><a href="http://money.aol.com/special/best-and-worst-2008">Best &amp; Worst in Money 2008</a></strong> feature.</em></p>
<p>As we undertake a hasty exit from the tumult of 2008 and plunge headlong into the mysteries of 2009, we might find it interesting to consider some business entities that could benefit from a little "freshening up." Four familiar names; Kmart, Playboy, Starbucks, and Wall Street, are each in need of a timely makeover, to varying degrees. But if you could chose just one of these big name operations to fix up for 2009, which one would it be, and how would you fix it?</p>
<p><iframe height="200" frameborder="0" align="right" width="205" src="http://webcenter.polls.aol.com/modular.jsp?template=1512&amp;view=157423&amp;pollId=157703&amp;channel=aol_us_personalfinance"></iframe>First let's consider Kmart, the adopted son of <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sears-holdings-corporation/shld/nas">Sears Holdings Corp.</a> (NASDAQ: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/sears-holdings-corporation/shld/nas">SHLD</a>). What are the changes that Kmart might need to remain competitive going into 2009? Should the company try playing the boutique angle, which failed to work for <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys">Wal-Mart Stores Inc</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/wal-mart-stores-inc/wmt/nys">WMT</a>)? Should the company tighten up and consolidate, while pursuing a deeper product value play, or should it attempt to spread out its market coverage and work over its wholesale vendors, while engaging Wal-Mart in a game of cut-throat retail price points? If you were CEO of Kmart, what would you change?</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/05/best-and-worst-in-money-2008-most-in-need-of-a-makeover/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Best &amp; Worst in Money 2008: Most in need of a makeover</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/05/best-and-worst-in-money-2008-most-in-need-of-a-makeover/">Best &amp; Worst in Money 2008: Most in need of a makeover</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 05 Dec 2008 14:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/05/best-and-worst-in-money-2008-most-in-need-of-a-makeover/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1385236/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2008/12/05/best-and-worst-in-money-2008-most-in-need-of-a-makeover/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Best and Worst 2008</category><category>featured</category><category>Kmart</category><category>makeover</category><category>merchandising</category><category>playboy</category><category>playboy magazine</category><category>playboy tv</category><category>retail</category><category>Sears Holdings</category><category>Spice Channel</category><category>Starbucks</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 14:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Playboy posts strong earnings, attracts hedge fund interest]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/07/playboy-posts-strong-earnings-attracts-hedge-fund-interest/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/07/playboy-posts-strong-earnings-attracts-hedge-fund-interest/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/07/playboy-posts-strong-earnings-attracts-hedge-fund-interest/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/marketing-and-advertising/" rel="tag">Marketing and Advertising</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/playboy-pla-logo.jpg" alt="Playboy Enterprises (NYSE: PLA) logo" /><a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/playboy-enterprises-inc/pla/nys">Playboy Enterprises Inc</a>. (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/playboy-enterprises-inc/pla/nys">PLA</a>), much like its founder Hugh Hefner, <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/playboy-3q-profit-up-on-licensing-growth/n20071107081609990010">continues to show signs of spunk.</a> The adult-entertainment company today reported better-than-expected <a href="http://www.playboyenterprises.com/home/content.cfm?content=t_press&amp;packet=1A3F8378-C9AF-1175-12D6F68BF341477C&amp;MmenuFlag=news">third quarter profit</a>, helped by strong licensing sales and international TV revenue. <br /><br />Shares of the Chicago-based company are up about 10% over the past six months. Playboy is gaining new pop culture relevance thanks to "The Girls Next Door" and that will be further helped whenever the big budget movie about Hefner gets made.<br /><br />   Playboy, though, is a small fish in a very big media pond. Net income for the quarter was $2.6 billion, or 8 cents per share, compared with $1.1 million, or 3 cents, a year earlier, beating Wall Street consensus forecasts of 6 cents. The revenue figure of $82.8 million -- only a 1% gain from the year-earlier period -- missed analysts' estimates of $86 million.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/07/playboy-posts-strong-earnings-attracts-hedge-fund-interest/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Playboy posts strong earnings, attracts hedge fund interest</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/07/playboy-posts-strong-earnings-attracts-hedge-fund-interest/">Playboy posts strong earnings, attracts hedge fund interest</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 07 Nov 2007 09:43:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://online.wsj.com/article/PR-CO-20071107-902378.html?mod=wsjcrmain>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/07/playboy-posts-strong-earnings-attracts-hedge-fund-interest/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1032735/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/11/07/playboy-posts-strong-earnings-attracts-hedge-fund-interest/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>adult entertainment</category><category>AdultEntertainment</category><category>hugh hefner</category><category>HughHefner</category><category>inthenews</category><category>pla</category><category>playboy</category><category>playboy enterprises</category><category>playboy magazine</category><category>PlayboyEnterprises</category><category>PlayboyMagazine</category><category>publishing</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Berr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 09:43:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Playboy (PLA) recovers from losing money]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/29/playboy-pla-recovers-from-losing-money/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/29/playboy-pla-recovers-from-losing-money/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/29/playboy-pla-recovers-from-losing-money/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/earnings-reports/" rel="tag">Earnings Reports</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/good-news/" rel="tag">Good news</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/consumer-experience/" rel="tag">Consumer Experience</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a></p><p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" align="right" alt="Playboy online logo" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/08/playboy-pla.jpg" />In what many may take to be a sign of the apocalypse, men's media company <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/playboy-enterprises-inc/pla/nys">Playboy Enterprises Inc.</a> (NYSE: <a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/playboy-enterprises-inc/pla/nys">PLA</a>) lost <a href="http://money.aol.com">money</a> last quarter. Whoever thought the "Empire the Bunny Built" would have money woes? Are men no longer interested in what Playboy has to offer? Hardly. But why pay when equivalent stuff is available online for free? So Playboy has begun a concerted effort to focus on digital media with Playboy TV and online offerings with pay-per-view video on demand. Judging by <a href="http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/playboy-enterprises-reports-improved/n20070807082609990032">recent earnings</a> (August 7), the strategy is working. Instead of a $3.3 million loss as in 1Q 2007, Playboy posted earnings of $1.9 million. Revenues rose 6% to $85.7 million and operating income was $3.8 million. 2Q diluted EPS was $0.06, much better than last quarter's loss of $0.10 per share.</p>
<p><em>Playboy Magazine</em> continues to lose money, as do so many other print media, posting a loss of $2.3 million for 2Q 2007. Both circulation and ad revenues remain in decline. So CEO Christie Hefner is leading Playboy into new ventures, including a new Playboy mansion in Macao to take advantage of the Chinese market. Playboy will own a 49% stake in this venture. Playboy is also expanding its international TV division, revenues up 16% to $13.7 million, and licensing arrangements, up 36% to $5.5 million.</p>
<p>Domestically, Playboy is trying to market itself as a social networking site (fully clothed) for the college crowd. It very recently launched PlayboyU.com to coincide with the return to classes. Too early to tell whether this ad revenue based site will offer any competition to YouTube and Facebook. If too successful, site traffic will incur the wrath of college IT managers who will block connections to it.</p>
<p>Just as no one actually reads Playboy for the book reviews, no one invests in Playboy because it may be a good investment. The stock began the year trading at $11.61. So far the stock has lost 8% of its value, closing Tuesday at $10.85, down $0.08.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/29/playboy-pla-recovers-from-losing-money/">Playboy (PLA) recovers from losing money</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 29 Aug 2007 10:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/playboy-enterprises-reports-improved/n20070807082609990032>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/29/playboy-pla-recovers-from-losing-money/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/976248/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/08/29/playboy-pla-recovers-from-losing-money/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Christie Hefner</category><category>Macao</category><category>men's entertainment</category><category>PLA</category><category>Playboy</category><category>Playboy Bunny</category><category>Playboy Enterprises Incorporated</category><category>Playboy Magazine</category><category>Playboy TV</category><category>PlayboyU.com</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Victoria Erhart]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
