Allen Stanford gets kicked around, but Bernie Madoff can clearly throw down some serious smack. While the former's being moved from one facility to another because he's lost some ground on the cell block, Madoff just earned himself some props.

The engineer of the largest (known) Ponzi scheme in history apparently got into an argument with another geriatric inmate at the Butner, North Carolina federal prison. Of course, it was over the stock market. Does it really make sense to outmaneuver a guy who never needed to know what the market was doing to deliver double-digit returns?

Well, push came to shove, as they say, with the "attacker" stumbling and looking up at a mean, mean Madoff. He got up and ran off.

Hedge fund manager Michael Regan has pleaded guilty to running a Ponzi scheme. Manager of the Massachusetts-based River Stream Fund, he admitted to defrauding around 70 investors. The fund held just shy of $20 million in assets ... despite the relatively meager $101,600 sitting in its accounts. The fund purported to return 20 percent a year since 2001, paying out $9 million in "profits" and returned capital.

If legendary comedian W.C. Fields were alive today, he would argue that there is a sucker born every second, particularly among investors looking for a quick buck. If you were shocked by the $50 billion Bernard Madoff Ponzi scheme, get ready to hear more tales of investors wronged by scam artists.

Madoff and his ilk can keep their alleged frauds going as long as there is an endless supply of gullible individuals eager to make "fast money" without asking too many questions. It was only when the market tanked that investors started to withdraw money from the one-time Wall Street legend and that the scheme was therefore unraveled. The same scenario may have occurred with clients of Joseph S. Forte of Broomall, Pa.

According to the SEC, Forte told investors that he would invest their money in an account that would trade in securities futures contracts including S&P 500 stock index futures.

This post is part of a feature in which he wonder whatever happened to some notorious financial felons. See all 17.

Back in the 1990s, Lou Pearlman was a well-know boy band mogul and talent scout, handling such talent as the BackStreet Boys and 'NSync. But in 2006 it became clear that Pearlman had perpetrated one of the biggest and longest running Ponzi schemes in American history.

It all started with a fake travel agency and grew into a complex enterprise comprised of many entities, funded by millions from banks and investors. The state of Florida, the FBI, the IRS, and the FDIC all took part in investigations. In 2007, Pearlman's attorneys filed suit to withdraw from representing him and Pearlman's assets were seized and his companies put into bankruptcy. Pearlman fled the country but was arrested after being spotted in Indonesia. He was promptly indicted by a federal grand jury on charges of bank fraud, mail fraud, and wire fraud.

With a year like that, he easily made BloggingStocks' list of Money Losers of 2007.

USANA Health Sciences (NASDAQ: USNA) just can't seem to wake up from its PR nightmare.

After the close of the market yesterday, San Diego class-action lawyer Alexander M. Schack said he filed a lawsuit in California state court on behalf of hundreds of low-level distributors in the state. The suit is also seeking an injunction preventing the multi-level marketing company from recruiting in the state.

Needless to say, California is a huge market for USANA and, at the very least, the publicity could hurt the company's recruiting efforts there.

According to Robert FitzPatrick of Pyramid Scheme Alert, "The essence of the Usana scheme is the chain letter. Participants pay up to $1,000 to participate in the "binary compensation" plan. They buy the bogus "business centers" (pyramid positions). They then must continue to buy over $100 of goods (priced in some cases 20 times more than comparable products sold in retail stores) every month. Of each dollar that the participant pays in, 40% goes to the upline recruiters. Of that amount, 70% goes to the top 3% of the pyramid chain. Virtually no one
retails the products at retail price. The prime consumers of Usana are just the "Associates" (pyramid participants.) Thus $28 of each hundred spent by the new recruits goes directly to schemers at the top of the pyramid. The bottom 97% are a continuously churning group. 2/3rds of them quit within a year. None makes a profit unless they can climb into the 3% by recruiting other victims."

USANA responded by saying that the suit was without merit and "relies on false claims made by a stock fraud felon who stands to profit from a decline in USANA's stock price."

If USANA wants to stop the bleeding, it will need to come up with a better defense. Barry Minkow, who the company's statement refers to, has earned a strong reputation for uncovering fraud and deception and was mentioned in Newsday a few days ago for his work in shutting down a $16 million ponzi scheme in New York.

Authorities have commended Minkow because he has a track record of providing facts that can be used to shut down financial crimes in progress. If USANA wants people to believe it is something other than that, it will need to provide a rebuttal to the allegations, something that is hasn't done so far.

Marketwatch columnist Chuck Jaffe has an excellent piece about the frequently fraudulent high yield investment programs (HYIP's) that litter the internet. Known for promising outrageous returns (10%+ per week in some cases) and given only vague details about how they earn their returns, these "investments" are most often Ponzi schemes.

I recently interviewd convicted felon Barry Minkow, who is now founder of the Fraud Discovery Institute, working tirelessly to protect investors from scams. In his new 3-part DVD series about protecting yourself from fraud (look for it on his website when it is avaialable) the DVD featured sections on investment fraud, elder fraud, and affinity fraud, and is both informative and entertaining. In talking about investment frauds (such as HYIP's), Minkow urged investors to think of it this way: Warren Buffett is considered arguably the greatest investor of all time, and he compounded money at a rate of about 23% per year.

Anytime someone offers you better returns, ask yourself: are they better than Warren Buffett?