<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>BloggingStocks</title>
<link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com</link>
<description>BloggingStocks</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[What Playboy Can Learn from Nintendo]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/07/what-playboy-can-learn-from-nintendo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/07/what-playboy-can-learn-from-nintendo/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/07/what-playboy-can-learn-from-nintendo/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/ntdoy/" rel="tag">Nintendo (NTDOY)</a></p><p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="Playboy logo" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/02/playboy-logo-240.jpg" />Playboy (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/playboy-enterprises-inc/pla/nys" class="inlinked">PLA</a>) has already cut its staff and cut its office space ... but you know things are bad when Hef starts cutting back on the amount of skin his Bunnies are baring.</p>
<p>According to industry reports, Playboy is planning on a mix of new sites aimed at tackling a tamer market -- and none of them involve nudity. According to Playboy insiders, the company is developing a "free, safe-for-work site" its calling TheSmokingJacket.com, as well as additional subscription content with a slightly tamer feel.</p>
<p>Broadening your appeal beyond a core product is no easy task. But if done successfully, it can forever change the fortunes of a company. Just look at <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/category/nintendo/" class="inlinked">Nintendo</a> (NTDOY) and its efforts to make video games mainstream and not a niche product for pimply-faced teenagers.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/07/what-playboy-can-learn-from-nintendo/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>What Playboy Can Learn from Nintendo</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/07/what-playboy-can-learn-from-nintendo/">What Playboy Can Learn from Nintendo</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 07 May 2010 16:40:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/07/what-playboy-can-learn-from-nintendo/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19468932/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/05/07/what-playboy-can-learn-from-nintendo/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>featured</category><category>inthenews</category><category>nintendo</category><category>NintendoWii</category><category>NTDOY</category><category>pla</category><category>playboy</category><category>porn</category><category>pornography</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Reeves]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 16:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Sex.com Sale Stalled by Involuntary Bankruptcy Filing]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/19/sex-com-sale-stalled-by-involuntary-bankruptcy-filing/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/19/sex-com-sale-stalled-by-involuntary-bankruptcy-filing/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/19/sex-com-sale-stalled-by-involuntary-bankruptcy-filing/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2010/03/sex-com-logo.jpg" />A day before it was set to go under the gavel, the sale of Sex.com stalled. The domain name was set to be auction, but an involuntary Chapter 11 filing by three of the company's creditors has put the brakes on the bidding. Escom LLC, which owns Sex.com, his on the hook, it seems, for an eight-figure tab.<br />
<br />
The creditors' petition, filed in U.S. Bankruptcy Court shortly after noon yesterday by Washington Technology Associates, iEntertainment, Inc. and AccountingMatters.com LLC, claims that Sex.com owes them $10,092,118.68, according to a report by adult entertainment industry trade publication <em>AVN</em> (NSFW).<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/19/sex-com-sale-stalled-by-involuntary-bankruptcy-filing/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Sex.com Sale Stalled by Involuntary Bankruptcy Filing</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/19/sex-com-sale-stalled-by-involuntary-bankruptcy-filing/">Sex.com Sale Stalled by Involuntary Bankruptcy Filing</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:00:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/19/sex-com-sale-stalled-by-involuntary-bankruptcy-filing/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19406398/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2010/03/19/sex-com-sale-stalled-by-involuntary-bankruptcy-filing/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>adult entertainment</category><category>bankruptcy</category><category>bankruptcy court</category><category>chapter 11</category><category>chapter 11 bankruptcy</category><category>domain name</category><category>domain names</category><category>porn</category><category>porno</category><category>pornography</category><category>sex</category><category>sex.com</category><category>sexy</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Android gets a red light district]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/28/android-gets-a-red-light-district/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/28/android-gets-a-red-light-district/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/28/android-gets-a-red-light-district/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/internet/" rel="tag">Internet</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/technology/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><img border="1" hspace="4" alt="" vspace="4" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2009/11/android-logo-200.jpg" />Tired of the prudes over at Apple (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/apple-inc/aapl/nas" target="_blank">AAPL</a>), who keep a tight leash on filth in <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/iTunes/">iTunes</a>? Well, it seems like the folks at Google (<a href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/google-inc/goog/nas" target="_blank">GOOG</a>) are keeping an open mind. Even though its <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/tag/AndroidMarket/">Android Market</a> isn't playing in the adult space, <a href="http://mashable.com/2009/11/27/android-porn-app-store/" target="_blank">Google isn't preventing adult-only content from getting on its devices</a>, while Apple has made it a point to keep its iPhones and iPods clean from the start.</p>
<p>The latest entrant into the Android experience is a company called <a href="http://www.mikandi.com" target="_blank">MiKandi</a> (say it, "my candy"), which provides mobile access to the hot stuff you can enjoy on a screen of any size. MiKandi has no connection to Google other than the use of its technology.</p>
<p><br /></p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/28/android-gets-a-red-light-district/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Android gets a red light district</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/28/android-gets-a-red-light-district/">Android gets a red light district</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 28 Nov 2009 16:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/28/android-gets-a-red-light-district/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19256646/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/28/android-gets-a-red-light-district/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>adult entertainment expo</category><category>adult video news</category><category>adultvest.com</category><category>android market</category><category>Apple iPhone</category><category>Apple iPod</category><category>aria giovanni</category><category>avn</category><category>club jenna</category><category>club jenna channel</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>google android</category><category>iphone</category><category>iPod</category><category>ipod touch</category><category>iTunes</category><category>itunes store</category><category>playboy</category><category>porn</category><category>pornography</category><category>red light district</category><category>sex</category><category>Sunny Leone</category><category>vivid</category><category>vivid entertainment</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 16:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Iconix sets its sights on Playboy]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/iconix-sets-its-sights-on-playboy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/iconix-sets-its-sights-on-playboy/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/iconix-sets-its-sights-on-playboy/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/media-world/" rel="tag">Media World</a></p><p><img hspace="4" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/10/playboy-pla-logo.jpg" />It's wabbit season!</p>
<p>There's only good news for Playboy (<a target="_blank" href="http://finance.aol.com/quotes/playboy-enterprises-inc/pla/nys">PLA</a>) when someone expresses an interest in buying it. Shares of the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33894271/ns/business-media_biz/">ailing men's lifestyle company</a> shot higher on Thursday when word got out that <a target="_blank" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33894271/ns/business-media_biz/">Iconix is interested in acquiring it</a>. Iconix owns and licenses brands to manufacturers and counts Candie's and London Fog among its holdings. A deal isn't a sure thing, but Playboy now has something it hasn't in a while: hope.</p>
<p>Iconix has been looking to acquire more brands. And Playboy has been looking for a knight in shining armor (and with a hefty war chest in tow) since at least June, when Scott Flanders took the helm. But it looked like acquisition bait well before then, thanks to a rough financial situation.</p><p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/iconix-sets-its-sights-on-playboy/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Iconix sets its sights on Playboy</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/iconix-sets-its-sights-on-playboy/">Iconix sets its sights on Playboy</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 13 Nov 2009 09:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/iconix-sets-its-sights-on-playboy/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/19236272/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/13/iconix-sets-its-sights-on-playboy/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>circulation</category><category>club jenna</category><category>ClubJenna</category><category>featured</category><category>hugh hefner</category><category>HughHefner</category><category>iconix</category><category>jenna jameson</category><category>JennaJameson</category><category>magazine</category><category>media</category><category>pla</category><category>playboy</category><category>porn</category><category>pornography</category><category>print</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Johansmeyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 09:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Penthouse bets $500 million on adult social networking]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/14/penthouse-bets-500-million-on-adult-social-networking/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/14/penthouse-bets-500-million-on-adult-social-networking/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/14/penthouse-bets-500-million-on-adult-social-networking/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/deals/" rel="tag">Deals</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/competitive-strategy/" rel="tag">Competitive Strategy</a></p><img width="165" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="221" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.bloggingstocks.com/media/2007/12/penthouse_-cover.jpg" alt="" />Penthouse Media Group has agreed to acquire the parent company of AdultFriendFinder, a website devoted helping adults find love -- or at least sex. The site is different from more mainstream (although AdultFriendFinder's traffic would seem to indicate its more mainstream that we care to think) sites like eHarmony in that the emphasis is on "hooking up" and there is little in the way of bragging about couples who met on the site.<br /><br />According to the USA Today, Penthouse, which was acquired by Marc Bell and Daniel Stanton out of bankruptcy in 2004, plans to aggressively pursue acquisitions and possibly take itself public in the next few years.<br /><br />Here's what's interesting: this is a company that owns social networking websites and was founded in 1996. It just sold for $500 million.<p><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/14/penthouse-bets-500-million-on-adult-social-networking/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Penthouse bets $500 million on adult social networking</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/14/penthouse-bets-500-million-on-adult-social-networking/">Penthouse bets $500 million on adult social networking</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 14 Dec 2007 11:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.usatoday.com/money/media/2007-12-12-penthouse_N.htm?imw=Y>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/14/penthouse-bets-500-million-on-adult-social-networking/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/1062814/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/12/14/penthouse-bets-500-million-on-adult-social-networking/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>AdultFriendFinder</category><category>featured</category><category>Penthouse</category><category>Penthouse Media Group</category><category>PenthouseMediaGroup</category><category>PLA</category><category>Playboy</category><category>porn</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zac Bissonnette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 11:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[ICANN nixes .XXX domain: You bet, I have an opinion]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/31/icann-nixes-xxx-domain-you-bet-i-have-an-opinion/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/31/icann-nixes-xxx-domain-you-bet-i-have-an-opinion/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/31/icann-nixes-xxx-domain-you-bet-i-have-an-opinion/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/rants-and-raves/" rel="tag">Rants and Raves</a></p><p>Being that I'm a hale-and-hearty defender of the First Amendment, I always take special notice of occurrences which could have significant impact on the dissemination of art, literature, or other such things. Once again, ICANN (Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers) has quashed a request for a .xxx domain to be created for the registration of "pornographic" websites. I cannot blame ICANN for shying away from giving its approval when I understand that the position of responsibility that approval would place it in is unacceptable for it, and would take the group well outside the scope of what it was created for.</p>
<p>So, we are still faced with the heavy infusion of pornographic material within the mainstream internet, and whether or not something can or should be done about it. I myself am in favor of a designated domain for sexually explicit material, for the simple reason that it would make it easier for parents to have success in restricting those materials from being accessed by their kids. I'm not writing this because I want to debate the existence of porn. I'm simply stating that we still have a situation which, in my opinion, must be dealt with.</p>
<p>I find it rather odd that the Family Research Council applauds the decision of ICANN. FRC claims that to provide a designated domain for the lusty sites would legitimize their existence and create a virtual "red light district" within the mainstream internet. I guess they don't understand that the stuff is already entrenched. I ask the Family Research Council to answer me this: If you were trying to displace prostitutes from your neighborhood would you rather do battle with them on your front porch or send someone else to deal with them in their own home? Your short-sighted approval of the ICANN decision is lost on me. Would it not be better to suggest an amended proposal that would get the job done?</p>
<p>In my considered opinion, this is a matter that shall not quietly pass. What we need to do is create the conditions wherein ICANN can to provide porn its own top-level domain without taking the responsibility to police it. The issue of domain monopoly would also need to be addressed. Then, without involving the courts, porn site webmasters could be encouraged to migrate their content to the new domain. After a reasonable period of voluntary change, I suspect about 70% of the adult sites would have willingly moved to the new domain. Then, I think it would be appropriate for adult sites in other domains to be challenged to prove why they should be allowed to remain outside their available "proper" channels.</p>
<p>I don't mean to say that porn should be stripped from the internet. I'm too much of a constitutionalist for that. I'm just saying that if the porn webmasters wish to remain unmolested on the web, we should create the safe conditions to allow them to do that. We will <u>never</u> do away with porn, but we most certainly can do away with being assaulted by it.</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/31/icann-nixes-xxx-domain-you-bet-i-have-an-opinion/">ICANN nixes .XXX domain: You bet, I have an opinion</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Sat, 31 Mar 2007 19:10:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/31/icann-nixes-xxx-domain-you-bet-i-have-an-opinion/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/864386/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2007/03/31/icann-nixes-xxx-domain-you-bet-i-have-an-opinion/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>.xxx</category><category>adult websites</category><category>censorship</category><category>Constitution</category><category>designated domains</category><category>domain</category><category>domain monopoly</category><category>domain policing</category><category>Family Research Council</category><category>First Amendment</category><category>FRC</category><category>ICANN</category><category>internet</category><category>porn</category><category>sexually explicit material</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Sattler]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 19:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Google sued 'for the children' in PR campaign by Long Island politico]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/05/google-sued-for-the-children-in-pr-campaign-by-long-island-pol/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/05/google-sued-for-the-children-in-pr-campaign-by-long-island-pol/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/05/google-sued-for-the-children-in-pr-campaign-by-long-island-pol/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/bad-news/" rel="tag">Bad News</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/law/" rel="tag">Law</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/blogs/" rel="tag">Blogs</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/goog/" rel="tag">Google (GOOG)</a></p>Can you say "publicity"? Evidently, that's all Jeffrey Toback, a member of the Nassau County (Long Island)legislature knows. He's suing Google <em>for the children</em>, claiming that the <ahref="http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/G/GOOGLE_CHILD_PORN_SUIT?SITE=CADIU&amp;SECTION=HOME&amp;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT">company'ssearch engine promotes paid ads for child pornography companies</a> [*cough* <ahref="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/25/if-ebay-partners-with-microsoft-who-will-be-the-evil-empire/">EVIL!</a>*cough*].<br /><br />Naturally, Google says that it is <em>not</em> "<span class="body">the largest and mostefficient facilitator and distributor of child pornography in th world." And that this is just a publicity stunt.What? No, not really?<br /><br /><a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20060505/0112200.shtml">Mike from Techdirtweighs in</a>, explaining that "the law here is </span> extremely clear: a service provider is not directlyresponsible for what people do on their platform" and calling the lawsuit "ridiculous" and "amisunderstanding both of the law and how Google works." Ridiculous it may be, but Jeffrey Toback's name is oneveryone's lips today. Investors evidently agree with Mike; the <ahref="http://finance.aol.com/usw/quotes/quotesandnews?exch=NAS&amp;sym=E%3ANAS%3AGOOG&amp;from=view_symbol">stock is up$1.50 in intraday trading</a>, to $396.25.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/05/google-sued-for-the-children-in-pr-campaign-by-long-island-pol/">Google sued 'for the children' in PR campaign by Long Island politico</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Fri, 05 May 2006 12:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20060505/0112200.shtml>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/05/google-sued-for-the-children-in-pr-campaign-by-long-island-pol/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/615308/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/05/05/google-sued-for-the-children-in-pr-campaign-by-long-island-pol/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>child porn</category><category>child pornography</category><category>ChildPorn</category><category>ChildPornography</category><category>do no evil</category><category>DoNoEvil</category><category>evil</category><category>evil empire</category><category>EvilEmpire</category><category>goog</category><category>google</category><category>google evil</category><category>GoogleEvil</category><category>jeffrey toback</category><category>JeffreyToback</category><category>lawsuit</category><category>long island</category><category>long island ny</category><category>LongIsland</category><category>LongIslandNy</category><category>microsoft</category><category>msft</category><category>msn</category><category>nassau county</category><category>NassauCounty</category><category>new york</category><category>NewYork</category><category>ny</category><category>porn</category><category>pornography</category><category>publicity</category><category>publicity stunt</category><category>PublicityStunt</category><category>toback</category><category>yahoo</category><category>yhoo</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 12:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Microsoft software, concert tickets, and now porn for your iPod?]]></title><link>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/12/microsoft-software-concert-tickets-and-now-porn-for-your-ipod/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/12/microsoft-software-concert-tickets-and-now-porn-for-your-ipod/</guid><comments>http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/12/microsoft-software-concert-tickets-and-now-porn-for-your-ipod/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/products-and-services/" rel="tag">Products and Services</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/msft/" rel="tag">Microsoft (MSFT)</a>, <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/category/aapl/" rel="tag">Apple Inc (AAPL)</a></p>Apple has finally found a product, in the iPod, that is an unqualified profit monster. The company is morphing fromniche hipster to provider of music to the masses. And as part of the transformation they're making moves that neverbefore seemed possible, like using Intel chips and (horrors!) Microsoft software on their computers. New strategiesindicate that Apple is willing to be creative and do some interesting deals, like the one where the Red Hot ChiliPeppers are selling advance tickets to their upcoming tour through the iTunes store.<br /><br />The obvious next step?<a href="http://quote.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000039&amp;cid=gilbert&amp;sid=atmv9JE0pOIQ">Porn, says MarkGilbert </a>(no relation to yours truly). If iPod owners will watch films on their 2.5" screens, surely they'llwatch movies of an, umm, more lascivious nature. It's a huge money business; if Apple could get just a sliver of that$20 billion in adult video sales each year, they might continue their finally-respectable growth. But is growthrespectable if it's (literally) made on the backs of the naked and promiscuous?<br /><br />I love profits and all, butfor the same reason I wouldn't invest in cigarettes, I'd feel very different about an Apple (fruit of the tree of goodand evil) sinking its strategic go-juice into porn. Mark Gilbert doesn't agree, with the (flawed) rationale:"<span class="style5">A search on Google Inc. shows a bunch of companies willing to sell the content and softwareneeded to view erotic material on an iPod. Apple may as well grab some of that revenue for itself." With thislogic, you could justify anything. I, for one investor, will pass.</span><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/12/microsoft-software-concert-tickets-and-now-porn-for-your-ipod/">Microsoft software, concert tickets, and now porn for your iPod?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com">BloggingStocks</a> on Wed, 12 Apr 2006 12:48:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://quote.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000039&amp;cid=gilbert&amp;sid=atmv9JE0pOIQ>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/12/microsoft-software-concert-tickets-and-now-porn-for-your-ipod/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/forward/607809/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2006/04/12/microsoft-software-concert-tickets-and-now-porn-for-your-ipod/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aapl</category><category>apple</category><category>apple computers</category><category>apple porn</category><category>AppleComputers</category><category>ApplePorn</category><category>concert</category><category>concert itunes store</category><category>ConcertItunesStore</category><category>dirty movies</category><category>DirtyMovies</category><category>intel chips</category><category>IntelChips</category><category>ipod</category><category>ipod porn</category><category>IpodPorn</category><category>itunes</category><category>itunes store</category><category>ItunesStore</category><category>mark gilbert</category><category>MarkGilbert</category><category>microsoft</category><category>msft</category><category>porn</category><category>porn ipod</category><category>porn movies</category><category>porn on ipod</category><category>PornIpod</category><category>PornMovies</category><category>pornography</category><category>PornOnIpod</category><category>profits</category><category>red hot chili peppers</category><category>RedHotChiliPeppers</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sarah Gilbert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2006 12:48:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
