Stop for a moment and give Exxon (NYSE: XOM), British Petroleum (NYSE: BP) and Chevron Corp. (NYSE: CVX) some considered thought. If you're into investing in oil, I want you to think about just exactly whose company you're showing favor to. More than ever it's time to pull the plug on Hugo Chavez by shifting your investment dollars away from Venezuelan interests and by putting Hugo Chavez's Citgo gas stations on notice. Most of America has no clue about what Hugo Chavez really is. Let me frame this for you.

You wouldn't buy groceries from a communist dictator, would you? Would you buy school textbooks from the likes of Joseph Stalin? Would you buy shop tools from the likes of Adolph Hitler? Would you go to a fresh fish market run by Fidel Castro? If you're a concerned American who's even marginally thoughtful about world history and current events, your answers to the preceding questions should be a resounding no.

If you answered no to the above questions, then why in the world would you buy gasoline from Hugo Chavez? Are you aware that Venezuela is negotiating to buy Russian submarines? I'll guarantee you that it doesn't want those subs for hunting tuna. Do you know Hugo Chavez is fully prepared to sink U.S. navel vessels if we need to attempt a blockade of Venezuelan oil transports? Hugo Chavez is actively building an offensive military and I shouldn't need to remind you that Venezuela is just a stone's throw away from your homeland. The EagleSpeak blog reports that, "Venezuela ordered weaponry from Russia worth $3.4 billion, including 24 Su-30MK2V Flanker fighters, Tor-M1 air defense missile systems, Mi-17B multi-role helicopters, Mi-35 Hind E attack helicopters and Mi-26 Halo heavy transport helicopters. ...Venezuela has become the world's second-largest importer of Russian weaponry after Algeria, which signed arms deals with Russia worth $7.5 billion."

You need to take heed of the fact that even the Venezuelan people are protesting their distrust for Hugo Chavez after he shut down Radio Caracas television for speaking in opposition against him. The Sea to Shining Sea blog comments that, "... In the wake of the RCTV protests, Chavez launched an offensive against the remaining opposition station, Globovision, and CNN, accusing them of destabilizing his government. ...The day will come when Venezuelans will not be able to stage opposition protests at all -- just like in the land of Chavez's mentor, Fidel Castro." Hugo Chavez doesn't like opposition, he hates America and he despises Israel.

The one saving grace that we may have in this situation is that Hugo Chavez is on a very "hand to mouth" budget. His cash reserves are relatively fast moving. He turns around his money very quickly and any interruption in his cash flow has immediate and significant consequences. It's time to put a serious knot in Hugo Chavez's plans for America and it should be very easy to do. Give serious consideration to where you will place your oil investment dollars and doublecheck the name on the gas station sign before you fill your fuel tank from now on. If the sign says Citgo, you may want to look down the road.

That is of course unless you want to make life easy for a communist dictator.

I'm just two generations removed from Germany and so is my wife. We still have "folks" of the Austrian and Bavarian persuasions so let's just say we have some mildly vested interest in this situation. UPI reports that violent protests have broken out last week in Germany amid massive peaceful assemblies that sought to derail the G8 summit in the city of Rostock. It seems that although many "leaders" of the demonstrations have attempted to quell the passions of their followers, those efforts have been at least temporarily futile.

It is no surprise to me that certain of the demonstrators have become majorly unglued. When one considers that the protest movement itself is so heavily left leaning, it's surprising to me that they have retained any order and control of themselves at all. Socialists, liberalists, anti-capitalists and anarchists, that's who most of these rioters are. I can almost hear them from here saying, "We don't like what we have so chaos is our last vestige of control."

I don't stand in the way of any person's right to protest, in fact, the democratic nations of the world have made provision for that. What I can't seem to bring myself to grips with is this wimp-like, face hiding, hood raised, pansy-assed style of rock throwing, car burning protest. What a bunch of puppies they are. They're all full of big words of hatred and world upheaval, but they choose to deliver their message from behind goofy masks. Back in my day, if you had a message to deliver to the establishment, you got right in a cop's face, close enough so he could smell your breath, you locked eyes with him and delivered your message firmly and in person within earshot of the press. If the cop was a man (or lady), they'd accept your message straight-faced and wait for you to move on. If the cop was an establishment fascist, you generally got grabbed by the collar, were given a set of stainless steel bracelets and spent the night in the tank. Either way, your message got through and there was no measurable property damage.

Protests can be the vehicles of change. Riots are just plain blatant stupidity. Anonymous rioters are criminals of the worst sort. Common sense and history dictate that peaceful demonstrations have the greatest effect over time. I have no other more effective solutions than that to offer.

Some BloggingStocks readers have been kind enough to comment on my blog post regarding the tax protest undertaken by Mr. and Mrs. Brown of New Hampshire. It seems to me that in light of the many ways in which our government has mishandled issues with its citizen over the last several decades, the issue of taxation should be taking more of a front seat. Not a one of us enjoys paying taxes, but most all of us agree that they are a necessary evil. Many of us see serious inequities and abuses in the system. I'll clarify some of my positions on the subject and I'll certainly provide some fuel for debate.

I don't disagree that the Browns have a right to protest their taxes in their own way, but what they are doing is, in my opinion, selfish, short sighted, ill-thought-out, and probably illegal. They are acting like the little child who hurls insults at the boogie man from under the covers. They buttress their actions by claiming that the system is so completely broken that any attempt to work with it is useless. Therein lies my reason for suggesting they should go elsewhere. There are a hundred ways that the Browns could stage an open, effective, and legal protest. They, however, have chosen to hide themselves in protest. In my opinion, they are shameful, loud-mouthed cowards.

Does our government overtax us? You damn bet they do. When hard-working citizens reach a certain income level, their governmental tax load is between 30% and 40% of their income. It approaches 50% if you add in all the permits, licenses, user fees, and a host of other city, county, and state hidden payouts. To me this is completely unacceptable. I've been saying for quite some time that, if you consider that our incomes start with a finite 100% and the governments keep taking one additional percent after another, how long will it be before we no longer have the funds to effectively operate as a public? Even more upsetting to me than the amounts of the funds taken is the fact that we have little to no say in how that money is spent. Taxation without (effective) representation? It wouldn't be too hard to argue that such is the case.